Submit 1 Mini-SOAP note on a patient that you saw in clinic this week. Submit as

Submit 1 Mini-SOAP note on a patient that you saw in clinic this week. Submit as

Submit 1 Mini-SOAP note on a patient that you saw in clinic this week. Submit as a Word Document. See example template below for required format.
Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Demographic Data
Age, and gender (must be HIPAA compliant)
Subjective
Chief Complaint (CC) unless an Annual Physical Exam (APE)
History of Present Illness (HPI) in paragraph form (remember OLDCART: Onset, Location, Duration, Characteristics, Aggravating/Alleviating Factors, Relieving Factors, Treatment)
Past Med. Hx (PMH): Medical or surgical problems, hospitalizations, medications, allergies, immunizations, and preventative health maintenance as applicable
Family Hx: As applicable
Social Hx: Including nutrition, exercise, substance use, sexual hx, occupation, school, etc.
Review of Systems (ROS) as appropriate: Include health maintenance (e.g., eye, dental, pap, vaccines, colonoscopy)
Objective
Vital signs
Physical findings listed by body systems, not paragraph form
Assessment (Diagnosis/ICD10 Code)
Include all diagnoses that apply for this visit
Plan
Dx Plan (lab, x-ray)
Tx Plan: (meds)
Pt. Education, including specific medication teaching points
Referral/Follow-up
Health maintenance (including when screenings, immunizations, etc., are next due):
*Based on population focus, some additional details may be required by faculty

I need help with my homework. I need you to create a patient with COPD, CHF, and

I need help with my homework. I need you to create a patient with COPD, CHF, and

I need help with my homework. I need you to create a patient with COPD, CHF, and cor pulmonale. I will send you an example of how it should be done. You need to provide the information just like you see in the example. I want to see if you are capable of doing it well. I will send more work once you finish this, and I will review it to see if it is possible for you to do more. I hope you understand. The information must be consistent with the diseases I chose. That is, all the data must correspond to a patient with COPD, CHF, and cor pulmonale.

In this assignment, you are required to write a concise reflection paper (one pa

In this assignment, you are required to write a concise reflection paper (one pa

In this assignment, you are required to write a concise reflection paper (one page) following APA 7th edition guidelines/format in, the third person, addressing the following key points:
Share a personal example or scenario from your own experiences, either as a healthcare professional or as an observer, where you have witnessed the impact of effective leadership or management on organizational culture.

Describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how thi

Describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how thi

Describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how this microsystem will help you develop your change project.
Identify and describe the problem in clear and concise language. To help you think about what problem you might choose, keep in mind the health or nursing problems of the patient population(s) you currently serve, those you encountered in your clinical courses, or those you plan to work with in the future.Describe the clinical setting.
Describe the service area for the clinic and population groups who attend the clinic services.
What kinds of problems do you see in the clinic?
Give a clear, explicit statement of the problem and target population, as well as the background of the specific problem relative to the clinical setting. Is it broad enough that you can analyze it from many theoretical and conceptual points of view and make suitable plans to address the problem from a number of perspectives?
Is it of enough interest to you that you are willing to spend most of the semester thinking about it, assessing all its dimensions, planning in detail how to address it, and designing a detailed intervention and evaluation plan?
Describe the significance of the evidence-based project that could be implemented in the selected setting to the nursing profession. Ask yourself why it is important to you. Consider your own clinical interest.Describe clinical observations that point out the knowledge gap, clinical gap, etc.
Describe the significant research in the area that has been done that delineates the gap in our knowledge.
Your paper should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. You must reference a minimum of 3 scholarly sources in your paper.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources.
See your Change Project Writing Assignment Resources folder for PICOT resources.
Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.
Points: 75
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
33.75 to >27.67 ptsMeets Expectations
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem thoroughly, including the target population and history/background information at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance and applicability to nursing is included and well presented.
27.67 to >25.31 ptsApproaches Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of the topic/problem, but leaves out some details in describing the target population or history/background information at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance and applicability to nursing is included but lacks a few details.
25.31 to >19.91 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanation of the topic/problem occurring at the facility. The target population and history/background information is lacking. The significance and applicability to nursing is included, but it is somewhat unclear or vague.
19.91 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not sufficiently describe the topic/problem. There is no description of the target population or history/background information. The significance and applicability to nursing is absent or severely lacking.
33.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
33.75 to >27.67 ptsMeets Expectations
Includes an appropriate topic identification related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population is fully defined and present in the research question. Includes specific interventions, identifies comparisons, and presents appropriate outcomes in a timely manner for the question. Overall, it is a well-built question using the PICOT format.
27.67 to >25.31 ptsApproaches Expectations
Includes an appropriate topic identification related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population description is too generic. Interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and timeframe are too general, making it hard to see a well-used PICOT format.
25.31 to >19.91 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Includes a topic identification, but it is not appropriately related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population description is very generic. May be missing interventions, comparisons, outcomes, or a timeframe. PICOT format is present, but all areas of the question are very generic, making it difficult to follow how the research will be collected.
19.91 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not include an appropriate selected topic related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population is not adequately identified. Interventions, comparison, outcomes, and timeframe are not adequately identified in the research question, showing no use of the PICOT format.
33.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format/Mechanics
7.5 to >6.15 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6.15 to >5.63 ptsApproaches Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
5.63 to >4.43 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
4.43 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
7.5 pts
Total Points: 75

This week, you are discussing pediatric conditions affecting cardiac, atopic, rh

This week, you are discussing pediatric conditions affecting cardiac, atopic, rh

This week, you are discussing pediatric conditions affecting cardiac, atopic, rheumatic, immunodeficiency, and respiratory system disorders. An important question for NPs is when should you refer? The answer is more about clinical judgment than what the practice guidelines say, although always follow practice guidelines on when to refer as with all else. Remember, even cardiologists have difficulty with things such as distinguishing certain murmurs. You need to be very careful about interpreting tests such as EKGs, echocardiograms, chest films, MRIs, CT scans, etc. Unless you have received formal education in these areas, it is best to refer. Always keep in mind “scope of practice.” Exceptions would be previously diagnosed conditions that are now stable with current treatment.
You are expected to present your initial topic, including, but not limited to, the following items:
Pathophysiology
Physical exam findings
Differential diagnoses and rationale
Management plan to focus on pharmacotherapy agents based upon evidence-based practice guidelines
Topics:
Murmurs (innocent and pathologic)
Asthma
Infective endocarditis, pericarditis
Myocarditis
Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Upper respiratory disorders (common cold, rhinosinusitis)
Pharyngitis, tonsillitis
Diphtheria, pertussis
Croup, epiglottitis
Nonbacterial and bacterial pneumonia
Cystic fibrosis
Pectus deformity
Rashes
Rheumatic fever
Systemic erythematosus lupus (SLE)
Any thoughts? Should the NP order any tests or labs before or while waiting for the referral? If so, what are some of these?
Minimum 3 references , please follow all instructions.

Procedure and Guidelines: Microsystem Assessment 20% (20 Points): Conduct a micr

Procedure and Guidelines:
Microsystem Assessment 20% (20 Points): Conduct a micr

Procedure and Guidelines:
Microsystem Assessment 20% (20 Points): Conduct a microsystem analysis of a particular practice setting (current or a specific potential practice setting where you desire to work in your new graduate practice role). If you are currently practicing, doing an actual assessment of your microsystem is the most beneficial approach to learning this process. You cannot begin this assignment until you have reviewed the appropriate Microsystem workbook and completed the readings in Nelson. Workbook Link is https://www.clinicalmicrosystem.org/knowledge-cent…
If you are currently in a role that is accountable for a macro system then you may choose to complete this assignment from that lens and you should clearly identify that you are doing so and that you understand the difference. Make a recommendation for change to promote effective outcomes and ensure safety for individuals. Please include a reflection on how you are living nursing as caring by proposing this change. Develop a potential evaluation processfor your proposal.
Please note that you must first conduct the assessment before you develop your interventions or response to the assessment. The assessment drivesthe recommendation for change. How did your 5-P assessment drive your Global Aim and the need for change? Assignment Directions and Grading Grid (maximum 20 points):
1. Utilize the 5-P Process to complete your assessment. You must begin by defining the Purpose of your Microsystem.(4 points)
2. Present evidence for your recommended change. Remember that the change should evolve from your 5-P assessment.(4 points)
3. Develop a P-D-S-A for your proposed change. (4 points)
4. Suggest an evaluation plan. (4 points)
5. What do you expect to be the results of this plan? What other resources might be needed to hard wire the desired results? (2 points)
6. APA, spelling, grammar and syntax do count! (2 point)
EVERYONE MUST COMPELTE THIS PART !!! Extra Credit: Up to 2 Extra credit points are available to students who choose to step it up and enhance their Microsystem Assessment by using tools such as fishbone diagrams, flow charts, bar charts, pareto charts, line graphs, and run charts.

I need help with my homework. I need you to create a patient with COPD, CHF, and

I need help with my homework. I need you to create a patient with COPD, CHF, and

I need help with my homework. I need you to create a patient with COPD, CHF, and cor pulmonale. I will send you an example of how it should be done. You need to provide the information just like you see in the example. I want to see if you are capable of doing it well. I will send more work once you finish this, and I will review it to see if it is possible for you to do more. I hope you understand. The information must be consistent with the diseases I chose. That is, all the data must correspond to a patient with COPD, CHF, and cor pulmonale.

Describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how thi

Describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how thi

Describe one reading that relates most closely to your project topic and how this microsystem will help you develop your change project.
Identify and describe the problem in clear and concise language. To help you think about what problem you might choose, keep in mind the health or nursing problems of the patient population(s) you currently serve, those you encountered in your clinical courses, or those you plan to work with in the future.Describe the clinical setting.
Describe the service area for the clinic and population groups who attend the clinic services.
What kinds of problems do you see in the clinic?
Give a clear, explicit statement of the problem and target population, as well as the background of the specific problem relative to the clinical setting. Is it broad enough that you can analyze it from many theoretical and conceptual points of view and make suitable plans to address the problem from a number of perspectives?
Is it of enough interest to you that you are willing to spend most of the semester thinking about it, assessing all its dimensions, planning in detail how to address it, and designing a detailed intervention and evaluation plan?
Describe the significance of the evidence-based project that could be implemented in the selected setting to the nursing profession. Ask yourself why it is important to you. Consider your own clinical interest.Describe clinical observations that point out the knowledge gap, clinical gap, etc.
Describe the significant research in the area that has been done that delineates the gap in our knowledge.
Your paper should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. You must reference a minimum of 3 scholarly sources in your paper.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources.
See your Change Project Writing Assignment Resources folder for PICOT resources.
Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.
Points: 75
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
33.75 to >27.67 ptsMeets Expectations
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem thoroughly, including the target population and history/background information at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance and applicability to nursing is included and well presented.
27.67 to >25.31 ptsApproaches Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of the topic/problem, but leaves out some details in describing the target population or history/background information at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance and applicability to nursing is included but lacks a few details.
25.31 to >19.91 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanation of the topic/problem occurring at the facility. The target population and history/background information is lacking. The significance and applicability to nursing is included, but it is somewhat unclear or vague.
19.91 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not sufficiently describe the topic/problem. There is no description of the target population or history/background information. The significance and applicability to nursing is absent or severely lacking.
33.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
33.75 to >27.67 ptsMeets Expectations
Includes an appropriate topic identification related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population is fully defined and present in the research question. Includes specific interventions, identifies comparisons, and presents appropriate outcomes in a timely manner for the question. Overall, it is a well-built question using the PICOT format.
27.67 to >25.31 ptsApproaches Expectations
Includes an appropriate topic identification related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population description is too generic. Interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and timeframe are too general, making it hard to see a well-used PICOT format.
25.31 to >19.91 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Includes a topic identification, but it is not appropriately related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population description is very generic. May be missing interventions, comparisons, outcomes, or a timeframe. PICOT format is present, but all areas of the question are very generic, making it difficult to follow how the research will be collected.
19.91 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not include an appropriate selected topic related to an advanced practice nursing issue or practice problem of concern. The population is not adequately identified. Interventions, comparison, outcomes, and timeframe are not adequately identified in the research question, showing no use of the PICOT format.
33.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format/Mechanics
7.5 to >6.15 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6.15 to >5.63 ptsApproaches Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
5.63 to >4.43 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
4.43 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
7.5 pts
Total Points: 75

This week, you are discussing pediatric conditions affecting cardiac, atopic, rh

This week, you are discussing pediatric conditions affecting cardiac, atopic, rh

This week, you are discussing pediatric conditions affecting cardiac, atopic, rheumatic, immunodeficiency, and respiratory system disorders. An important question for NPs is when should you refer? The answer is more about clinical judgment than what the practice guidelines say, although always follow practice guidelines on when to refer as with all else. Remember, even cardiologists have difficulty with things such as distinguishing certain murmurs. You need to be very careful about interpreting tests such as EKGs, echocardiograms, chest films, MRIs, CT scans, etc. Unless you have received formal education in these areas, it is best to refer. Always keep in mind “scope of practice.” Exceptions would be previously diagnosed conditions that are now stable with current treatment.
You are expected to present your initial topic, including, but not limited to, the following items:
Pathophysiology
Physical exam findings
Differential diagnoses and rationale
Management plan to focus on pharmacotherapy agents based upon evidence-based practice guidelines
Topics:
Murmurs (innocent and pathologic)
Asthma
Infective endocarditis, pericarditis
Myocarditis
Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Upper respiratory disorders (common cold, rhinosinusitis)
Pharyngitis, tonsillitis
Diphtheria, pertussis
Croup, epiglottitis
Nonbacterial and bacterial pneumonia
Cystic fibrosis
Pectus deformity
Rashes
Rheumatic fever
Systemic erythematosus lupus (SLE)
Any thoughts? Should the NP order any tests or labs before or while waiting for the referral? If so, what are some of these?
Minimum 3 references , please follow all instructions.