Category: Health & Medical

Perform a literature review using a minimum of seven (7) peer-reviewed articles

Perform a literature review using a minimum of seven (7) peer-reviewed articles and books, as well as non-research literature such as evidence-based guidelines, toolkits, standardized procedures, etc.
Review of areas in relationship to medicine, nursing, public health, etc.The review should be critical and synthesize rather than just being a catalog of studies.
Summarize the key findings of the research and its relevancy to your project that point out the scientific status of the phenomenon under question. Such a statement includes: What we know and how well we know it.
What we do not know.
Describe any gaps in knowledge that you found and the effects this may have on advanced practice nursing as it relates to your project topic.
Your integrative literature review should be 5–6 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. You must reference a minimum of 7 scholarly articles published within the past 5–7 years.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.
Points: 80
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 3: Integrative Literature Review
NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 3: Integrative Literature Review
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
44 to >36.08 ptsMeets Expectations
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and professionally sound and creative. Insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions are present. Knowledge gaps are identified and the implications on nursing are expertly explored.
36.08 to >33.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are sound and creative, but are not well synthesized. Conclusions and solutions may be general or unconnected. Knowledge gaps are identified but the implications on nursing may be general or lacking insight.
33 to >25.96 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Provides insufficient analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are not professionally sound and creative. Ideas are in a list format rather than synthesized. Few if any knowledge gaps are identified and the implications on nursing may be erroneous or missing.
25.96 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The literature is listed, but it is neither analyzed nor synthesized.
44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20 to >16.4 ptsMeets Expectations
A minimum of 7 peer-reviewed articles, books, or limited non-research literature (tool kits or standardized procedures) are present. Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Subtopics are used to support the main topic. All in-text citations are present and correctly formatted.
16.4 to >15.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
There are between 5–6 peer-reviewed articles, books, or limited non-research literature (tool kits or standardized procedures) are present. Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Only a few subtopics are used to support the main topic and/or subtopics are inappropriate. Most in-text citations are present, but might be improperly formatted.
15 to >11.8 ptsFalls Below Expectations
There are between 2–4 peer-reviewed articles, books, or limited non-research literature (tool kits or standardized procedures) are present. Some of the literature is not supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Subtopics are not used to support the main topic. In-text citations are missing or several are improperly formatted.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Most literature included is not supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely, or there are between 0–1 sources identified. Subtopics are not used to support the main topic. In-text citations are incorrect or missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
8 to >6.56 ptsMeets Expectations
Content is well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.
6.56 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Content is overly wordy or lacking in specific language. Information is reasonably organized and communicated.
6 to >4.72 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Content is disorganized in many places and it lacks clarity.
4.72 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Content lacks clarity and information is disorganized, or may be a list or a catalog of ideas.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format/Mechanics
8 to >6.56 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6.56 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6 to >4.72 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
4.72 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
8 pts
Total Points: 80

Submit a problem-focused SOAP note for grading. You must use an actual patient f

Submit a problem-focused SOAP note for grading. You must use an actual patient from your clinical practicum who presents with one or more chief complaints.
Use the format below for your SOAP note.
Use the current APA format to style your paper and cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Problem-focused SOAP Note Format
Demographic Data
Age, and gender (must be HIPAA compliant)
Subjective
Chief Complaint (CC): A short statement about why they are there
History of Present Illness (HPI): Write your HPI in paragraph form. Start with the age, gender, and why they are there (example: 23-year-old female here for…). Elaborate using the acronym OLDCART: Onset, Location, Duration, Characteristics, Aggravating/Alleviating Factors, Relieving Factors, Treatment
Past Med. Hx (PMH): Medical or surgical problems, hospitalizations, medications, allergies, immunizations, and preventative health maintenance
Family Hx: any history of CA, DM, HTN, MI, CVA?
Social Hx: Including nutrition, exercise, substance use, sexual hx, occupation, school, etc.
Review of Systems (ROS) as appropriate: Include health maintenance (e.g., eye, dental, pap, vaccines, colonoscopy)
Objective
Vital Signs
Physical findings listed by body systems, not paragraph form- Highlight abnormal findings
Assessment (the diagnosis)
At least Two (2) differential diagnoses (if applicable) with rationale and pertinent positives and negatives for each
Final diagnosis with rationale, pertinent positives and negatives, and pathophysiological explanation
Plan
Dx Plan (lab, x-ray)
Tx Plan (meds): including medication(s) prescribed (if any), dosage, frequency, duration, and refill(s) (if any)
Pt. Education, including specific medication teaching points
Referral/Follow-up
Health maintenance: including when screenings eye, dental, pap, vaccines, immunizations, etc. are next due (USPSTF guidelines)
Reference
Compare care given to the patient with the National Standards of Care/National Guidelines. Cite accordingly.

Submit a problem-focused SOAP note for grading. You must use an actual patient f

Submit a problem-focused SOAP note for grading. You must use an actual patient from your clinical practicum who presents with one or more chief complaints.
Use the format below for your SOAP note.
Use the current APA format to style your paper and cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Problem-focused SOAP Note Format
Demographic Data
Age, and gender (must be HIPAA compliant)
Subjective
Chief Complaint (CC): A short statement about why they are there
History of Present Illness (HPI): Write your HPI in paragraph form. Start with the age, gender, and why they are there (example: 23-year-old female here for…). Elaborate using the acronym OLDCART: Onset, Location, Duration, Characteristics, Aggravating/Alleviating Factors, Relieving Factors, Treatment
Past Med. Hx (PMH): Medical or surgical problems, hospitalizations, medications, allergies, immunizations, and preventative health maintenance
Family Hx: any history of CA, DM, HTN, MI, CVA?
Social Hx: Including nutrition, exercise, substance use, sexual hx, occupation, school, etc.
Review of Systems (ROS) as appropriate: Include health maintenance (e.g., eye, dental, pap, vaccines, colonoscopy)
Objective
Vital Signs
Physical findings listed by body systems, not paragraph form- Highlight abnormal findings
Assessment (the diagnosis)
At least Two (2) differential diagnoses (if applicable) with rationale and pertinent positives and negatives for each
Final diagnosis with rationale, pertinent positives and negatives, and pathophysiological explanation
Plan
Dx Plan (lab, x-ray)
Tx Plan (meds): including medication(s) prescribed (if any), dosage, frequency, duration, and refill(s) (if any)
Pt. Education, including specific medication teaching points
Referral/Follow-up
Health maintenance: including when screenings eye, dental, pap, vaccines, immunizations, etc. are next due (USPSTF guidelines)
Reference
Compare care given to the patient with the National Standards of Care/National Guidelines. Cite accordingly.

Perform a literature review using a minimum of seven (7) peer-reviewed articles

Perform a literature review using a minimum of seven (7) peer-reviewed articles and books, as well as non-research literature such as evidence-based guidelines, toolkits, standardized procedures, etc.
Review of areas in relationship to medicine, nursing, public health, etc.The review should be critical and synthesize rather than just being a catalog of studies.
Summarize the key findings of the research and its relevancy to your project that point out the scientific status of the phenomenon under question. Such a statement includes: What we know and how well we know it.
What we do not know.
Describe any gaps in knowledge that you found and the effects this may have on advanced practice nursing as it relates to your project topic.
Your integrative literature review should be 5–6 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages. You must reference a minimum of 7 scholarly articles published within the past 5–7 years.
Use current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.
Points: 80
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 3: Integrative Literature Review
NURS_691A_DE – NURS 691-A Rubric Week 3: Integrative Literature Review
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
44 to >36.08 ptsMeets Expectations
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and professionally sound and creative. Insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions are present. Knowledge gaps are identified and the implications on nursing are expertly explored.
36.08 to >33.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are sound and creative, but are not well synthesized. Conclusions and solutions may be general or unconnected. Knowledge gaps are identified but the implications on nursing may be general or lacking insight.
33 to >25.96 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Provides insufficient analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are not professionally sound and creative. Ideas are in a list format rather than synthesized. Few if any knowledge gaps are identified and the implications on nursing may be erroneous or missing.
25.96 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The literature is listed, but it is neither analyzed nor synthesized.
44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20 to >16.4 ptsMeets Expectations
A minimum of 7 peer-reviewed articles, books, or limited non-research literature (tool kits or standardized procedures) are present. Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Subtopics are used to support the main topic. All in-text citations are present and correctly formatted.
16.4 to >15.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
There are between 5–6 peer-reviewed articles, books, or limited non-research literature (tool kits or standardized procedures) are present. Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Only a few subtopics are used to support the main topic and/or subtopics are inappropriate. Most in-text citations are present, but might be improperly formatted.
15 to >11.8 ptsFalls Below Expectations
There are between 2–4 peer-reviewed articles, books, or limited non-research literature (tool kits or standardized procedures) are present. Some of the literature is not supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Subtopics are not used to support the main topic. In-text citations are missing or several are improperly formatted.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Most literature included is not supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely, or there are between 0–1 sources identified. Subtopics are not used to support the main topic. In-text citations are incorrect or missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
8 to >6.56 ptsMeets Expectations
Content is well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.
6.56 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Content is overly wordy or lacking in specific language. Information is reasonably organized and communicated.
6 to >4.72 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Content is disorganized in many places and it lacks clarity.
4.72 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Content lacks clarity and information is disorganized, or may be a list or a catalog of ideas.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format/Mechanics
8 to >6.56 ptsMeets Expectations
Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6.56 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
6 to >4.72 ptsFalls Below Expectations
Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. Assignment contains some spelling and grammatical errors.
4.72 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.
8 pts
Total Points: 80

Explore the impact artificial intelligence may have on employee relations. Selec

Explore the impact artificial intelligence may have on employee relations. Select one topic from the list below and answer the questions below in your submission.
Potential topics to choose from:
Pay and Benefits
Job Structure (what tasks you execute as part of your role)
Job Performance (employee reviews/performance evaluations, promotions/demotions, etc.)
Policies
Employee Relations Investigations
Hiring/Job Candidate Recruitment
Reflection Questions:
1. How will artificial intelligence, specifically the newest innovations like Chat GBT (openAI/Microsoft), positively impact the topic you selected? You have to be specific in your response, so avoid generic language like “better” or “improved” unless you detail how artificial intelligence will improve or better the topic.
2. How will artificial intelligence, specifically the newest innovations like Chat GBT (openAI/Microsoft), negatively impact your selected topic? Similar to above – be specific.
3. Pretend you are a CEO of a business that is looking to adopt new processes or technologies that harness artificial intelligence for some purpose related to the topic you selected. Identify at least one question you would ask or a step you could take to minimize the potential negatives you identified in question 2 above.
You are encouraged to do your research but these articles may help you start to brainstorm:
https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-generative-a

#NAME?

– This is a Geriatric Depression Teaching Plan Presentation. You need to create a presentation 13 slides (excluding title page and reference page.
– Must reflect the information given in your care plan and ESPECIALLY your teaching plan.
– Each body slide needs to have speakers notes that will be in the NOTES section NOT on the slide.
– Each slide must have a image (Tip: use the designer tool)
– APA format

Explore the impact artificial intelligence may have on employee relations. Selec

Explore the impact artificial intelligence may have on employee relations. Select one topic from the list below and answer the questions below in your submission.
Potential topics to choose from:
Pay and Benefits
Job Structure (what tasks you execute as part of your role)
Job Performance (employee reviews/performance evaluations, promotions/demotions, etc.)
Policies
Employee Relations Investigations
Hiring/Job Candidate Recruitment
Reflection Questions:
1. How will artificial intelligence, specifically the newest innovations like Chat GBT (openAI/Microsoft), positively impact the topic you selected? You have to be specific in your response, so avoid generic language like “better” or “improved” unless you detail how artificial intelligence will improve or better the topic.
2. How will artificial intelligence, specifically the newest innovations like Chat GBT (openAI/Microsoft), negatively impact your selected topic? Similar to above – be specific.
3. Pretend you are a CEO of a business that is looking to adopt new processes or technologies that harness artificial intelligence for some purpose related to the topic you selected. Identify at least one question you would ask or a step you could take to minimize the potential negatives you identified in question 2 above.
You are encouraged to do your research but these articles may help you start to brainstorm:

Task summary: Dear Freelancer,
please write a medical form. Use the draft provid

Task summary: Dear Freelancer,
please write a medical form. Use the draft provided to complete the attached form. Size should be 2500 words, written directly inside the attached form doc and without using any outside sources.
Full order description:? MAIN DETAILS: a medical reconsideration form to complete take the draft provided, write it professionally with good word choice. Only complete the first two boxes of the form.
Note from teacher: Emphasis on the untruthfulness of the facility to provide heating in a safe and comfortable environment. As well as their willingness to express untruthfulness that they were working to resolve when they were not and had not from my time of admission until investigation was done in March. And that’s deemed as abuse and patient neglect. The two key points that need facilitated in documentation are abuse/neglect and truthfulness
? ATTACHED:-task template -draft

PHC335
It must be a comprehensive and comprehensive solution
You should avoid p

PHC335
It must be a comprehensive and comprehensive solution
You should avoid plagiarism from any website or artificial intelligence
You must provide the solution within two hours only from the time you accept the request and do not wait until the time specified on the site
Proper referencing in APA format is must
Text size 12-Times New Roman only.
Avoid plagiarisms
Avoid copying from any source
Avoid using another teacher’s solution or a similar previous student’s solution because it is a university whose system can access even the solutions published on the study pool website
You must give 100/100 correct solution
Avoid using paraphrasing programs or websites
You must provide a correct answer 100/100
You must do the solution in the same attached file
You must do the solution in the same attached file
Proper referencing in APA format is must
example (madgg,2015)

talk about a rare disease that we will see in our daily live.
Disease, epidemio

talk about a rare disease that we will see in our daily live.
Disease, epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, how to support the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment and management, if sexual transmission explain how to inform the authorities and the protocol.
No more than 5 pages, excluding tittle and references.
APA rules