I want two graphs as it shows on the document. The graphs need to look the same

I want two graphs as it shows on the document. The graphs need to look the same

I want two graphs as it shows on the document. The graphs need to look the same as it shows on the documents, but the first graph needs to be in green and all graphs need to cover the entire year.
example 1: from march2022 to feb 2023 for 6 average highs except four spot that have 4 averages like I draw on the attached document
example 2: from March 2023 to feb 2024 for 7 average highs except five spot that have 4 averages like I draw on the attached document

Task summary: Dear Freelancer, please write the discussion portion of paper on “

Task summary:
Dear Freelancer, please write the discussion portion of paper on “

Task summary:
Dear Freelancer, please write the discussion portion of paper on “Urban Adults Patients with Diabetes Mellitus & Implementation of Social Determinants to Improve Glycemic Control: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.”
Full order description:
MAIN DETAILS:
1. Summarize Key Findings: Start by reiterating your research problem and concisely summarizing your major findings. This should be a clear statement of the overall result that directly answers your main research question.
2. Interpretations: Discuss what our results mean. This is where you delve into the meaning, importance, and relevance of your results.
3. Implications: Discuss why your results matter. Show how your findings relate to your literature review and research topic, and make an argument in support of your overall conclusion.
4. Limitations: Acknowledge the limitations of your study. This should aim to strengthen your credibility, not emphasize weaknesses or failures.
5. Recommendations: Share recommendations for further studies or analyses
.Remember, the discussion section should not be a second results section. It should focus on explaining and evaluating what we found.
Also, avoid introducing new results.It’s a systematic review and meta-analysis and I just need to do the discussion

Week 7 Assignment – Disaster Operations Policies and Procedures Due: Mon Feb 19,

Week 7 Assignment – Disaster Operations Policies and Procedures
Due: Mon Feb 19,

Week 7 Assignment – Disaster Operations Policies and Procedures
Due: Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:00amDue: Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:00am
Ungraded, 200 Possible Points200 Points Possible
Attempt
In Progress
NEXT UP: Submit Assignment
Add Comment
3 Attempts Allowed
Available after Jan 29, 2024 12:00amAvailable after Jan 29, 2024 12:00am
Details
Overview
Last week you viewed the Villa Health Disaster Recovery scenario and summarized the challenges facing the hospital, choosing the one that you considered most difficult. In this assignment, you will create a presentation to the hospital board that details compelling reasons to update the plan by evaluating areas for improvement.
Preparation
Review the Villa Health Disaster Recovery scenario and your work on the Week 6 activity as necessary.
Instructions
Considering the scenario, create a 10-12 slide (equivalent to about 10 minutes) PowerPoint presentation (with detailed speaker’s notes) designed to inform the hospital board of the importance of creating a robust Disaster Recovery Plan. It should address the following:
Describe areas of risk, including the specific nature of the risk, to the hospital if the plan is not revised.
Identify all primary stakeholders (internal and external) that should be considered or consulted when creating a disaster plan.
Outline the major items a comprehensive disaster plan should include with a brief description of why each is critical. Examples of areas are staffing, supplies, protocols, et cetera.
Choose the most important aspect of your disaster plan outline and do the following. (If necessary, make and state any assumptions that you have to flesh out your reasoning.)Justify the choice of the primary issue, including identifying the areas of significant impact such as budget, staffing, communications, et cetera.
Describe a manner in which the plan can be effectively communicated.
Explain all significant barriers to implementation.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Assess US health care management practices, procedures, and regulations.
View Rubric
Week 7 Assignment – Disaster Operations Policies and Procedures
Week 7 Assignment – Disaster Operations Policies and Procedures
CriteriaRatingsPts
Describe areas of risk to the hospital if the plan is not revised that includes the specific nature of the risk. (20%)view longer description
40 to >36 pts
Exemplary
Described areas of risk to the hospital if the plan is not revised that includes the specific nature of the risk.36 to >32 pts
Competent
Described areas of risk to the hospital if the plan is not revised but failed to include the specific nature of the risk.32 to >28 pts
Needs Improvement
Identified areas of risk to the hospital if the plan is not revised or provided descriptions that lack sufficient detail to promote an understanding of the risk areas.28 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not identify areas of risk to the hospital if the plan is not revised./ 40 pts
Identify all primary stakeholders (internal and external) that should be considered or consulted when creating a disaster plan. (15%)
view longer description
30 to >27 pts
Exemplary
Identified all primary stakeholders (internal and external) that should be considered or consulted when creating a disaster plan. Included a short description of the nature of their interest.27 to >24 pts
Competent
Identified primary stakeholders (internal and external) that should be considered or consulted when creating a disaster plan.24 to >21 pts
Needs Improvement
Identified stakeholders that should be considered or consulted when creating a disaster plan, but with significant errors or omissions.21 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not Identify stakeholders that should be considered or consulted when creating a disaster plan./ 30 pts
Outline the major items that a comprehensive disaster plan should include with a brief description of why each is critical. (20%)
view longer description
40 to >36 pts
Exemplary
Outlined the major items that a comprehensive disaster plan should include with a brief description of why each is critical.36 to >32 pts
Competent
Outlined the major items that a comprehensive disaster plan should include but failed to provide a brief description of why each is critical.32 to >28 pts
Needs Improvement
Outlined the major items that a comprehensive disaster plan should include, but with significant errors or omissions28 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not outline items that a comprehensive disaster plan should include./ 40 pts
Justify the choice of the primary issue that needs to be addressed in the disaster plan including an identification of the areas of significant impact. (20%)
view longer description
40 to >36 pts
Exemplary
Justified the choice of the primary issue that needs to be addressed in the disaster plan including an identification of the areas of significant impact.36 to >32 pts
Competent
Justified the choice of the primary issue that needs to be addressed in the disaster plan but failed to identify areas of significant impact.32 to >28 pts
Needs Improvement
Described an issue that needs to be addressed in the disaster plan but provided little justification for importance.28 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not describe an issue that needs to be addressed in the disaster plan./ 40 pts
Describe a manner in which the disaster plan can be effectively communicated. (10%)
view longer description
20 to >18 pts
Exemplary
Described a manner in which the disaster plan can be effectively communicated.18 to >16 pts
Competent
Described a manner in which the disaster plan can be communicated that lacked detail that would effectively guide its implementation.16 to >14 pts
Needs Improvement
Identified a manner in which the disaster plan can be communicated.14 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not identify a manner in which the disaster plan can be communicated./ 20 pts
Explain significant barriers to implementation. (10%)
view longer description
20 to >18 pts
Exemplary
Explained significant barriers to implementation.18 to >16 pts
Competent
Explained significant barriers to implementation, but with significant errors or omissions.16 to >14 pts
Needs Improvement
Identified significant barriers to implementation or explained items that were not likely to be significant barriers.14 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Did not identify significant barriers to implementation./ 20 pts
Produce writing that contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling in accordance with SWS style. (5%)
view longer description
10 to >9 pts
Exemplary
Produced writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling with 0–2 errors.9 to >8 pts
Competent
Produced writing that attempts to be clear and well organized and to apply appropriate SWS style. Writing contains some errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling. There may be occasional errors (1–2), but they do not impact the ability of the reader to understand the writing.8 to >7 pts
Needs Improvement
Produced writing that has noticeable issues with clarity, organization, and the application of SWS style. Writing contains some errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling. There are multiple errors (3–4) that distract from the reader’s ability to understand the writing.7 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Produced writing that lacks clarity, organization, or does not apply SWS style. There are significant issues with grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Overall, errors are significant in number (5 or more), and the reader will have difficulty understanding the writing./ 10 pts
Total Points: 0
Choose a submission type
Select submission type TextTextSelect submission type UploadUpload
I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement

A 75-year-old widower walks into your practice to request therapy services. He h

A 75-year-old widower walks into your practice to request therapy services. He h

A 75-year-old widower walks into your practice to request therapy services. He has grieved the loss of his wife for the last 28 months; they were married 50 years.
Explain the significance of interpersonal deficit as it relates to interpersonal therapy
Describe how you would ask “very good” questions to facilitate the patient’s ability to see their own experiences.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 2

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 2

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 27, 36, 37(refrences). I uploaded my case and also my power point that you should complete it and my case material

Step 1: You will use the Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Templat

Step 1: You will use the Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Templat

Step 1: You will use the Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template Download Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Templateto:
Compose a written comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic.
Upload your completed comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation as a Word doc. Scanned PDFs will not be accepted.For the Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Presentation Assignment: You will need to get it signed by your preceptor for the presentation (actual signature, not electronically typed).
Step 2: Each student will create a focused SOAP note video presentation in the next assignment. See Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Presentation 3 for more details.
SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.
S =
Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/ Demographics; History of the Present Illness (HPI) that includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem (OLDCARTS or PQRST); Review of Systems (ROS)
O =
Objective data: Medications; Allergies; Past medical history; Family psychiatric history; Past surgical history; Psychiatric history, Social history; Labs and screening tools; Vital signs; Physical exam, (Focused), and Mental Status Exam
A =
Assessment: Primary Diagnosis and two differential diagnoses including ICD-10 and DSM5 codes
P =
Plan: Pharmacologic and Non-pharmacologic treatment plan; diagnostic testing/screening tools, patient/family teaching, referral, and follow up
Other: Incorporate current clinical guidelines NIH Clinical GuidelinesLinks to an external site. or APA Clinical GuidelinesLinks to an external site., research articles, and the role of the PMHNP in your evaluation.
Psychiatric Assessment of Infants and ToddlersLinks to an external site.
Psychiatric Assessment of Children and AdolescentsLinks to an external site.
Reminder: It is important that you complete this assessment using your critical thinking skills. You are expected to synthesize your clinical assessment, formulate a psychiatric diagnosis, and develop a treatment plan independently. It is not acceptable to document “my preceptor made this diagnosis.” An example of the appropriate descriptors of the clinical evaluation is listed below. It is not acceptable to document “within normal limits.”
Graduate Mental Status Exam Guide Download Graduate Mental Status Exam Guide
Successfully Capture HPI Elements in Psychiatry E/M NotesLinks to an external site.
AAPC Admin. (2013, August 1). Successfully capture HPI elements in psychiatry E/M notes. Advancing the Business of Healthcare. https://www.aapc.com/blog/25848-successfully-captu…
Submission Instructions:
Upload your completed Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation as a word document. It will be assessed through Turnitin.
Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 2

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 2

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 27, 36, 37(refrences). I uploaded my case and also my power point that you should complete it and my case material

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 2

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 2

I need you add some more information on slides number: 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25, 27, 36, 37(refrences). I uploaded my case and also my power point that you should complete it and my case material

Choose one published quantitative research study that has relevance to your PICO

Choose one published quantitative research study that has relevance to your PICO

Choose one published quantitative research study that has relevance to your PICOT question.You must attach a PDF of the article you selected with your post. Read the article and answer the following questions in the Discussion Forum:
Include the citation for your article in APA format.
1. What key words did you use when conducting your search?
2. What was the study design?
3.
Describe the level of the research design on the evidence hierarchy
(use the Rating System for the Hierarchy of Evidence for
Intervention/Treatment Questions in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, pg.
11)?
4. Why was the study done?
5. Describe the process of determining the validity, reliability, and applicability of this study design
6.
What does this research mean for clinical practice and how did the
findings of this research help to answer your PICOT question?

Explain how telemedicine help in the delivery of healthcare in the rural areas ?

Explain how telemedicine help in the delivery of healthcare in the rural areas ?

Explain how telemedicine help in the delivery of healthcare in the rural areas ?
“A Systematic Review of Economic Analyses of Telehealth Services Using Real Time Video Communication”
To successfully complete this activity, please follow the provided instructions:
Carefully read the attached article, which is relevant to the topic of the week.
Answer the corresponding questions for each given answer. Remember to write down the question for each response.
Your answers should consist of a minimum of six lines, demonstrating your comprehension of the article content. Take the time to express your thoughts clearly and concisely. It is recommended to double-check for any spelling mistakes before submitting your answers. Using a word document for spelling check is highly recommended.
You have two options for submitting your answers: either through text submission or by attaching a word document.