In this assignment, you are required to write a concise reflection paper (one pa
In this assignment, you are required to write a concise reflection paper (one page) following APA 7th edition guidelines/format in, the third person, addressing the following key points:
Share a personal example or scenario from your own experiences, either as a healthcare professional or as an observer, where you have witnessed the impact of effective leadership or management on organizational culture.
Describe cultural variations in business card exchange.
How are gender and age r
Describe cultural variations in business card exchange.
How are gender and age related to position and status in the United States?
Explain the difference between the terms “flaming” and “shouting” in relation to netiquette.
Explain class distinctions in the United States and India.
What are some advantages and disadvantages of using e-mail?
i already wrote some i added documents to add more to the paper like budget doc
i already wrote some i added documents to add more to the paper like budget doc and video pls lmk if you have questions
Describe cultural variations in business card exchange.
How are gender and age r
Describe cultural variations in business card exchange.
How are gender and age related to position and status in the United States?
Explain the difference between the terms “flaming” and “shouting” in relation to netiquette.
Explain class distinctions in the United States and India.
What are some advantages and disadvantages of using e-mail?
Procedure and Guidelines:
Microsystem Assessment 20% (20 Points): Conduct a micr
Procedure and Guidelines:
Microsystem Assessment 20% (20 Points): Conduct a microsystem analysis of a particular practice setting (current or a specific potential practice setting where you desire to work in your new graduate practice role). If you are currently practicing, doing an actual assessment of your microsystem is the most beneficial approach to learning this process. You cannot begin this assignment until you have reviewed the appropriate Microsystem workbook and completed the readings in Nelson. Workbook Link is https://www.clinicalmicrosystem.org/knowledge-cent…
If you are currently in a role that is accountable for a macro system then you may choose to complete this assignment from that lens and you should clearly identify that you are doing so and that you understand the difference. Make a recommendation for change to promote effective outcomes and ensure safety for individuals. Please include a reflection on how you are living nursing as caring by proposing this change. Develop a potential evaluation processfor your proposal.
Please note that you must first conduct the assessment before you develop your interventions or response to the assessment. The assessment drivesthe recommendation for change. How did your 5-P assessment drive your Global Aim and the need for change? Assignment Directions and Grading Grid (maximum 20 points):
1. Utilize the 5-P Process to complete your assessment. You must begin by defining the Purpose of your Microsystem.(4 points)
2. Present evidence for your recommended change. Remember that the change should evolve from your 5-P assessment.(4 points)
3. Develop a P-D-S-A for your proposed change. (4 points)
4. Suggest an evaluation plan. (4 points)
5. What do you expect to be the results of this plan? What other resources might be needed to hard wire the desired results? (2 points)
6. APA, spelling, grammar and syntax do count! (2 point)
EVERYONE MUST COMPELTE THIS PART !!! Extra Credit: Up to 2 Extra credit points are available to students who choose to step it up and enhance their Microsystem Assessment by using tools such as fishbone diagrams, flow charts, bar charts, pareto charts, line graphs, and run charts.
Country : United Kingdom
Service Required : Powerpoint Presentation
Subject : Me
Country : United Kingdom
Service Required : Powerpoint Presentation
Subject : Mental health nursing
Level of Study : Undergraduate
Target Grade : Undergraduate 1st
Length: 12 slides
Delivery Time : 10 Days
Time for requesting changes : Standard 7 days
Paper instructions : Need a presentation and transcript. the presentation should not be overloaded with information; just bullet points of things will be verbally talked about. References must be included in both the PowerPoint and the transcript. transcript to be written/structured as an essay.
For this assessment, you will present a proposal for an intervention, which will be a change in nursing practice that aims to improve practice. As a leader, you will identify how you will lead the implementation of this proposed practice change and critically reflect on your own personal and professional skills and knowledge.
Learning objectives
1. Evaluate strategies to develop your personal and professional accountability in decision making to provide excellent care in partnership with people with a mental health problem their families/carers and their interdisciplinary team whilst considering social inclusion
2. Critically reflect on your own strengths and areas for development as an emergent leader and future practitioner
3. Compare evidence-based leadership solutions which develop a strength-based approach to enhance teams and manage change in a variety of settings for people with a mental health problem
4. Evaluate professional interpersonal skills to support effective supervision of others and contribute to their learning and assessment.
Must mainly use the lecturers reading which i have provided for high marks also only use UK references. No USA references, this essay is UK based. I will provided further information via as an attachment.
VALUE-BASED CARE
To prepare for your Week 2 Assignment, in this Discussion, you
VALUE-BASED CARE
To prepare for your Week 2 Assignment, in this Discussion, you will focus on your current understanding of value-based care delivery in the United States. Based on your understanding, you will then analyze the rationale for the shift from pay for performance (P4P) to value-based care in the U.S. healthcare system. Finally, you will evaluate how this shift to value-based care has improved patient outcomes and experiences in the areas of cost, quality, and access.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review this week’s Learning Resources.
BY DAY 4
Post a cohesive response to the following:
Describe your understanding of value-based care delivery.
Analyze the rationale for the shift from pay for performance (P4P) to value-based care in the U.S. healthcare system.
Evaluate how the shift to value-based care has improved patient outcomes and experiences in the areas of cost, quality, and access.
Read some of your colleagues’ postings.
Refer to the Week 1 Discussion 2 Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work.
What type of stakeholders need to be involved in a communication plan for your b
What type of stakeholders need to be involved in a communication plan for your business plan? Provide a rationale.
Managing Health Care Business Strategy
Moseley, G. B. (2017). Managing health care business strategy (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett. ISBN-13: 9781284081107
Complete this CLINICAL JUDGEMENT PLAN form with the information provided and fin
Complete this CLINICAL JUDGEMENT PLAN form with the information provided and find more resources and research. Make sure include in-text citation and APA reference page at the end. NO PLAGIARISM pls.
Florida National University
PHI1635 Biomedical Ethics: Assignment Week 3
Case St
Florida National University
PHI1635 Biomedical Ethics: Assignment Week 3
Case Study: Chapter 5
Objective: The students will complete a Case study tasks that contribute the opportunity to produce and
apply the thoughts learned in this and previous coursework to examine a real-world scenario. This
scenario will illustrate through example the practical importance and implications of various roles and
functions of a long-term care settings. As a result of this assignment, students will be better able to
comprehend, scrutinize and assess respectable superiority and performance by all institutional employees.
ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%):
Students will critically measure the readings from Chapter 5 in your textbook. This assignment is
planned to help you examination, evaluation, and apply the readings and strategies to your of a
long-term care settings
You need to read the PowerPoint Presentation assigned for week 3 and develop a 3-4 page paper
reproducing your understanding and capability to apply the readings to your long-term care
settings. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard
margins. Follow APA Style 7th edition format when referring to the selected articles and include
a reference page.
EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. Introduction (25%) Provide a brief synopsis of the meaning (not a description) of each
Chapter and articles you read, in your own words that will apply to the case study presented.
2. Your Critique (50%)
Case study: Patient-Centered Care: Case Studies on End of Life in elderly
Background
Ms. L is an 87-year-old African American woman who was diagnosed with vulvar cancer at the
beginning of 2017. She is also HIV-positive. By the time Ms. L engaged in care, the cancer had
proliferated quite quickly in the setting of a compromised immune system. Upon discovery of
the Stage 4 cancer, doctors recommended a dose of radiation and chemotherapy. However,
during the course of this episode Ms. L was struggling with substance use. During her
hospitalization, she tested positive for a number of substances, including heroin and cocaine. As
a result, care providers had many discussions about pain management and which pain
medications could be given to her. She was not on methadone treatment maintenance at first, so
she was self-medicating to address her pain. While Ms. L wanted to seek help for her addiction
to substances, some of the traditional models were not appropriate given the magnitude of her
physical issues. There were expectations that she would get into outpatient treatment but she did
not follow through, primarily because it was difficult for her to tolerate being in groups for long
periods. (Given the location of her cancer, she could not sit upright for long periods or on the bus
for transportation.) Ultimately, Lawanda Williams, Director of Housing Services at Health Care
for the Homeless in Baltimore, Maryland, and her team were able to provide Ms. L with
transportation and cab vouchers so she could access the full course of radiation that doctors had
recommended. Her pain was never well controlled, because her physician refused to prescribe
her any pain medications, due to the magnitude of her substance use. The radiation center gave
her Percocet while she was there but would not give her anything that could not be directly
supervised. After treatment, they sent her home with prescriptions for Tylenol and instructions to
return and follow up with pain management teams, which she was unable to do because of her
difficulties with transportation and sitting. Ms. L completed radiation and is in a period of
holding to assess effectiveness of the initial course of radiation, but she still does not have a
prescription for her significant pain and, as a result, continues to use substances to manage her
pain. Ms. Williams observes, “I have been able to see how managing withdrawal and managing
substance abuse in the context of a palliative care treatment plan does not always exist for
patients experiencing homelessness. She does not fit very neatly into any mainstream treatment
model.”
CASE STUDY CHALLENGE:
1. Harm reduction: How can care providers best advocate for a harm reduction approach while
seeking to deliver palliative care services, including hospice care?
2. What ethical arguments can you make base on the case study?
3. Why do you think that long-term care and palliative care insurance lacks of popularity among
older Americans.
3. Conclusion (15%)
Briefly summarize your thoughts & conclusion to your critique of the case study and provide a
possible outcome for Aging in America base on Health ethics Context?
Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular:
a) The clarity with which you critique the case study;
b) The depth, scope, and organization of your paper; and,
c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these Case study on any Health
Care Setting