Category: Health Care

Complete each section of the feasibility study as completely as possible, and su

Posted on | by Laureen

Complete each section of the feasibility study as completely as possible, and su

Complete each section of the feasibility study as completely as possible, and support with relevant evidence. The length of your feasibility study will depend largely on the project or program you are proposing to address the need of your organization. Be sure that each section is fully addressed. Your feasibility study should: Provide relevant information on the organization (Section I). Analyze the objectives of the proposed program (Section II). Explain why you are proposing the program. Where does it fit within the organization? What systems will be affected by it? What systems issues will it address? Explain how both patients and the organization will benefit from implementing the proposed program. Provide evidence that the program is needed. Explain the value of the program (Section III). How well does it align to the organization’s mission? How well does it fit with existing programs and services? Do competitors offer something similar? If so, how will your program give your organization a competitive advantage? Analyze the potential financial and economic issues of implementing the program (Section IV). Identify any economic issues that could affect the success of the program. Explain how your program could affect the local economy (both positively and negatively). Identify possible funding sources. Estimate the cost of implementing and maintaining your program. Analyze the marketing issues associated with your program (Section V). Explain how your program may affect the existing marketing approach. Explain how your program will meet the needs of the target market demographic. Explain how you will differentiate your program from those of competitors. Determine how the program may affect the entire organization (Section VI). Are there regulatory or policy implications? Will new licenses or certificates be required for the organization or staff members? Will the program affect the tax status of the organization? How might the program affect liability and risk management? Do you have enough space for the program? Do you have evidence to support the effectiveness of the program? Recommend a course of action based on the information in the feasibility study. How does your recommendation reflect ethical decision making? Deliverable Format The feasibility study is a professional document and should therefore follow the corresponding MBA Academic and Professional Document Guidelines, including single-spaced paragraphs. Organize your document using this structure: Title page. (What is the title of your proposed program?) Executive summary. (Many executives require an executive summary for projects of this type. The summary is written last, but becomes the first section of the feasibility study and provides an overview of the goals and objectives, summarizes the key points supporting the need, summarizes the key points supporting your proposed program, and includes your conclusion and recommendations.) Feasibility study. References page. APA-formatted references. Written using language appropriate for an executive audience. Evaluation By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies through corresponding scoring guide criteria: Competency 1: Analyze how economic, legal, regulatory, and policy factors influence the organization and financing of health care delivery systems. Provide relevant information on an organization. Analyze the potential financial and economic issues associated with implementing the proposed program. Analyze the marketing issues associated with the proposed program. Competency 2: Analyze relationships between elements of a health care system and organizational goals. Explain the value of a proposed program. Competency 3: Analyze how health care systems influence decision making within health care organizations. Analyze the objectives of a proposed program for an organization. Determine how the proposed program could affect the organization. Competency 4: Communicate health care management needs, opportweekies, and strategies with multiple stakeholders. Recommend an ethical and evidence-based course of action. Correctly format citations and references using current APA style. Write content clearly, logically, and in a manner appropriate for the target audience. Your faculty will use the scoring guide to review your deliverable as if they were your CEO. Review the scoring guide prior to developing and submitting your assessment.

You will look at what outcomes will be addressed to determine if your interventi

Posted on | by Laureen

You will look at what outcomes will be addressed to determine if your interventi

You will look at what outcomes will be addressed to determine if your interventions are effective. This paper should integrate HP2030 (https://health.gov/healthypeople) and CDC information into your paper. 1. Research Topic: Unintentional Childhood Injury and Deaths 2. Identify your target population (for instance, age or other demographic, aggregate population); this must be in your city or state. 3. Discuss population-based health education interventions for your target population that is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality for the problem. Be sure to review the research literature and HP2030 for interventions. 4. Identify how and what data for interventions is being tracked. o In a four (4) page paper, address the following. Identify the problem in the introduction section. o Provide an overview of the problem in your state/national. o Review of descriptive epidemiological and demographic data on mortality/morbidity and risk. o HP2030: Present the goal, overview and objectives of Healthy People 2030 for the paper topic. o Population level prevention and health promotion review. Describe population and/or primary health care focused interventions. Use of scholarly literature and HP2030 is required. There should be direct correlation to evidence for all strategies.

Create a 5–10-minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propos

Posted on | by Laureen

Create a 5–10-minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propos

Create a 5–10-minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence-based plan to improve the outcomes for the patient in the provided case study and examine how remote collaboration provided benefits or challenges to designing and delivering the care.

PERFORMANCE TASK: i HAVE BEEN ABLE TO APPLY – EMPATHY TOWARDS PEOPLE AS WELL AS

Posted on | by Laureen

PERFORMANCE TASK: i HAVE BEEN ABLE TO APPLY – EMPATHY TOWARDS PEOPLE AS WELL AS

PERFORMANCE TASK: i HAVE BEEN ABLE TO APPLY – EMPATHY TOWARDS PEOPLE AS WELL AS FOR DIFFERET CULTURES , RELEGIONS. ALSO HOLD RESPECT FOR DIVERSE CULTURES AND BELIEFS. Goal: The goal of this assignment is to have you assess how well you have been able to apply course concepts to your own nursing practice to improve your cultural competency. Instructions: In the previous modules, you have learned about different types of kinship systems and family patterns, care with different populations, as well as beliefs and rituals for death and dying. Using correct APA Style, write a three-page (typed, double-spaced) essay describing how you have been able to apply what you’ve learned in this class to your nursing practice. Give specific examples of the concepts you’ve been able to apply and how you have applied them. You must include citations and a minimum of three references in APA format. Must be scholarly references within the past five years, unless citing seminal work. Note: the paper is worth 100 points and is due on Sunday by 11:59 pm at the end of module 4! Rubric Performance Task Rubric: Essay Performance Task Rubric: Essay Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style and APA 30 to >25.4 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Includes paragraph transitions. B. Appropriate tone. C. Range in sentence structure. D. Correct use of punctuation and capitalization. E. Appropriate use of grammar. F. Follows APA guidelines, including at least three peer-reviewed references published in the last five years 25.4 to >20.9 pts Meets Expectations A. Consistency in writing at a scholarly level. B. Follows some APA guidelines (may have less than three peer-reviewed references published in the last five years) 20.9 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Not written at an acceptable level for a scholar. B. Little to no use of APA guidelines (references do not reflect peer-reviewed materials published in the last five years) 0 pts Not Present 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Independent Thought 20 to >16.9 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Understands central concept(s). B. Identifies salient arguments. C. Thoughtfully evaluates major alternative points of view. D. Appropriate synthesis of literature. E. Addresses all prompts in a thorough manner. 16.9 to >15.0 pts Meets Expectations A. Compares and contrasts perspectives. B. Summarizes the concepts. C. Follows where evidence and reasons lead. D. Offers a synopsis of the literature using minimal direct quotes. E. Addresses all prompts. 15 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Misinterprets evidence. B. Fails to identify relevant counter-arguments. C. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. D. Reiterates what is shown in the literature using many direct quotes. E. No evidence of synthesis. F. Does not address all prompts. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-Based Theory and Practice 20 to >16.9 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Application to professional practice is evident. B. Uses sufficient peer-reviewed/scholarly sources. C. Documents sources to support research assertions. 16.9 to >13.9 pts Meets Expectations A. Theories supported by evidence or citations. B. Integrates readings and literature. C. Includes sufficient peer-reviewed sources. 13.9 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Little attempt to place details in context. B. Little to no use of broader ideas or theories. C. Uses non-scholarly references. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance to Profession 15 to >12.74 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Analyzes implications for the institution, the larger context, and personal professional growth. B. Demonstrates best practices in profession. C. Communicates the importance of vision and mission. D. Demonstrates value for organizational success. 12.74 to >10.4 pts Meets Expectations A. Connection to personal experience is evident. B. Includes implications for the profession, the larger context, and professional growth. C. Analyzes implications for the institution or organization. D. Relates best practices. E. Connections between vision/mission and application are present. 10.4 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Does not explain implications of learning with the profession, the larger context, or professional growth. B. Does not analyze implications for the profession. C. Does not acknowledge best practices. D. Fails to consider vision/mission or role of leadership. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Application 15 to >12.74 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Creates new ideas based upon previous knowledge and experiences. B. Relates knowledge to draw insightful conclusions. C. Transitions ideas into real-life application. 12.74 to >10.4 pts Meets Expectations A. Application of knowledge and experience is evident. B. Uses knowledge to draw conclusions. C. Connects ideas to real-life application. 10.4 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Significant omission of required components. B. Does not relate knowledge to draw conclusions. C. Does not transition ideas into real-life application. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Total Points: 100