Rogerian Argument Essay on Gay Marriage

Contentions also known as arguments can be made out of pretty much anything. Just like anything else in life, there are always two sides to every story so the same applies when it comes to arguments. An argument has opposite sides, and passing on a feeling is one of those opposite sides. Arguments sort out the perspectives of others and the help of those arguments spoken to by those individuals from past occasions. These occasions let others demonstrate their contention about what will occur later on, and of how the future continues today. Paper articles can also be other forms of arguments, and laws being passed in Congress have a type of argument related to them. Numerous kinds of contentions are introduced from multiple points of view. In Everything’s an Argument by Andrea A. Lunsford data is given around three explicit sorts of contention: measurable, deliberative, and stately. Legal contentions manage the past, deliberative discussions about the future, and stylized is about the present. I have distinguished every one of these contentions as paper articles.

Legal contentions manage past occasions that have officially occurred previously. “Arguments about the present—what Aristotle terms epidemic or ceremonial arguments—explore the current values of a society, affirming or challenging its widely shared beliefs and core assumptions” (pg 17). A Los Angeles Times article titled ‘Same-sex marriage at the Supreme Court, once more’ is one case of a criminological contention. This article discusses how Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act decisions of a year ago are as yet including debate inside the courts. This article has signs that equivalent-sex marriage is as yet an issue being conveyed to the Supreme Court. The contention is that the judges are set up to build up the State’s rights to group marriage in the customary sense. The article shouts that ‘Last year, as the Supreme Court was thinking about cases on both Proposition and the Defense of Marriage Act, this page encouraged the judges to issue a decision clarifying that state bans on same-sex marriage abused the Constitution’ (Los Angeles Times). It is being communicated that any state boycott disallowing same-sex marriage won’t be sacred later on. It is expressed that ‘the issue is that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who composed the larger part feeling in the DOMA case, did not unequivocally address the defendability of laws against same-sex marriage, even as he articulately censured Congress for disparaging wedded same-sex couples’ (Los Angeles Times). To decide why it is taking such a long time for the judges to quit drawing out the issue, the article takes a gander at the proof of how data has not been tended to. The higher courts presently can’t seem to settle a choice on same-sex marriage. Court spectators theorized that judges needed the decision of same-sex marriage to go to the lower courts because the procedure demonstrating would draw out for a considerable length of time until an official choice is made. Be that as it may, ‘The speed with which legal counselors and lower-court judges are squeezing the issue recommends that the judges should stand up to it as soon as possible’ (Los Angeles Times). This is a portrayal of the meaning of a criminological contention, to take a gander at the activities of the past to decide the present. The activity of a general chief is outlandish because they have such a great amount to control and are requested to work with ‘private-division productivity while obliged to the moving political requests of City Hall’ (Los Angeles Times). The individual who gets the fault for whatever occurs with the Department of Water and Power is the general director. Be that as it may, Nichols is leaving due to the ‘battle for control of the utility between Mayor Eric Garcetti and Brian D’Arcy, the business chief of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 18, the association speaking to most DWP representatives’ (Los Angeles Times). A definitive fault is put on Ron Nichols because he wouldn’t like to discharge any records without D’Arcy’s help. He gets the fault since it is something he wouldn’t like to let out.

A definitive objective of attention is to analyze our thoughts just as others. Contentions rotating around the past, present, and future can be displayed in any structure. Articles of measurable contention, for instance, intentional the past and what happened prompting inquiries concerning why this occurred, or what ought to have been. Articles concerning the present hold numerous issues individuals will banter on and set ways for what’s to come. Contentions of how to realize a worthier and more prosperous future will be debated in deliberative contentions. Arguments are all over the place and there is no way for us to hide from them.

Marriage Equality Should Be Legalized Around The World

Marriage equality is still not legalized or widely accepted by multiple nations because they think it violates their tradition and is against nature when marriage is a civil and emotional bond between two individuals and a promise to make each other happy while staying together regardless of their genders. However, another school of thought is that it should be legal, it promotes a sense of equality, freedom, acceptance, and security among non-binary people. Many people in this world are still left out of this deal because their loved one is of similar gender as they are. The legalization of gay marriage brings immense benefits for gay people which can make their life easier and simpler whereas it has been always opposed by most societies and all the concerns of opposition are backed by research and dispelling of common myths and false conceptions.

On the one hand, for many communities, the prime reason for not promoting such spousal relationships is religion and tradition that it upsets their God which is unacceptable. On the other hand, Amara Das Wilhelm mentioned “since the earliest recorded times, homosexuality and crossdressing is common as minorities in cultures such as Indian, Chinese, Egyptian, Greek and Roman” in Galva-108, according to this book, during 8000 B.C “The world’s earliest depictions of homosexuality are found in the ancient San rock paintings of Zimbabwe, Africa.3100. The Mahabharata of India describes how Lord Arjuna was well received in the palace of Maharaja Virata while spending one year as a crossdressing transgender” which falsifies the concern that God is against it. Eliminating gender-based marriage discrimination will bring acceptance for gay people in society. Homosexuals face difficulties from birth till death due to unacceptance as social injustice, isolation, and abuse which is the cause of many chronic mental diseases like depression and social anxiety. The Law of the country defines the thought of the nation. If the law of the country accepts it, people will have to accept it too. Hence reduction in social discrimination. Moreover, Social abuse and crime against homosexuals can be minimized as they get similar rights as other couples. Fear of punishment can work in the favor, if somebody breaks the law will have to face consequences.

Freedom to marry also gives freedom to start families to such couples. Humans are social animals and we all need family. Authorization of marriage equality makes adoption possible for them. A wide range of masses argues that heterosexual parents are better parents than homosexual ones. On the contrary, from the reasearch paper on Same-Sex Marriage, Divorce and Families: Selected Recent Developments, it is evident “…..despite the finding that children’s adjustment outcomes in same-sex families were similar to those of children placed with heterosexual couples.” publication No. 2013-74-E, by Martha Butler and Cynthia Kirkby. Furthermore, it works as a two-edged sword as these adoptions can help a lot of orphans and homeless kids to get homes leads to enhancement in the quality of life of both parents and kids. To add to it, these adoptions work as the key factor for population control as the increasing populace is a development barrier for many nations.

The exclusion from civil union or marriage is the prime reason for significantly worse mental and physical health among homophiles. According to the American Medical Association, in November 2009 “Sexually transmitted diseases are on the higher rate in unmarried homosexuals than married.” mentioned by William C. Buffie, M.D. Thus, Gay marriage is the solution to a lot of problems. Authorization of marriage equity ensures legal rights to gay couples like heterosexual couples. Firstly, it allows them to have joint accounts or property rights, thus couples can grow both economically and emotionally like others. Secondly, it allows them for pension splitting which can not be possible for them to do it individually. Additionally, Numerous health care, health insurance, and survivor benefits can also be shared together. A famous Greek philosopher and polymath, Aristotle (384 B.C–324 B.C) once said that “Man is by nature a political animal”. Some political and communal groups for their benefit are making it never resolving issue whereas the legalization of gay marriage does not harm any individual, religion, society, or country. Marriage is the right of every individual in the democratic world regardless of race, religion, and gender.

This heated topic of decades can be resolved by integrity and advancement of thoughts. All the financial, physiological, social, mental, and emotional problems of homosexual individuals have one solution, Marriage Equality and If peace, equality, and quality of life become the prime motives of society, then together we all can grow.