Category: Friendship

In the novel, Mice and Men has many themes presented by John Steinbeck, one among which is about friendship essays. The novel shows the connection between the protagonists, George and Lennie, and showing how they struggle to realise the American Dream by working together. this is often in contrast to several of the opposite characters who are alone by themselves which seems to be normal at the time of the good Depression. The reader is in a position to seem at how the necessity to possess a companion is portrayed by Steinbeck, especially during the tough economic times that the story is about in. Both George and Lennie are always behind each others back and had pulled his hat down on him. Lennie taking care of the vulnerable in society instead of George having to seem after him by himself. Curley wants a lot of attention and require notice from people.

The reliance that George and Lennie wear each other is in a position to emphasise how it’s only the friendship between the 2 of them which allows them to survive. Lennie saying ‘I got you to seem after me, and you bought me to seem after you. ’ the underlying truth that both George and Lennie have for each other. Lennie has always seen his friend and said ‘he had pulled his hat down more over his eyes than the way George’s hat was. ’ as a task model and sees him as guidance on the way to live his own life. George needs Lennie the maximum amount as Lennie needs George despite Lennie being the one who is mentally challenged and in need of constant supervising.

John Steinbeck also uses the character, Lennie, to ask how it should society should be collectively taking care of the vulnerable in society instead of George having to seem after him by himself. The reliance on each of the most characters on each other emphasises how important friendship is keeping both them and therefore the novel together. The friendship is additionally portrayed by John Steinbeck as he’s opposing the thought of individuals working just by themselves. “People like us, that the employment on ranches are the most loneliest people I’ve ever seen within the world. They got no family. They belong no place…they ain’t got nothing to seem ahead to. ” is showing what the author John Steinbeck sees of the thought of itinerant workers being by themselves. This is often despite the very fact it might have much likely to be easier during the time of the good Depression to be by yourself and have a sustained way of life. The author John Steinbeck emphasises friendship by watching how unhappy the people that are by themselves are. the very fact that Lennie who can only understand basic ideas is in a position to ascertain the migrant workers as ‘lonely’ goes to means how a companion is required to be ready to live a very cheerful life.

Curley’s wife is seen together of the foremost isolated characters ‘Think I don’t wish to ask somebody ever once during a while. ’ for all she wants is attention and for people to require notice of her. The very fact that she has nobody to be with is what leads her to act during a manner and eventually, this is often also an explanation for her death. This shows that it strives to be happy without a lover is often fatal. Crooks is additionally an individual who strives for friendship, ‘S’pose you did not have anybody. S’pose you did not enter the bunkhouse and together play rummy ’cause you was black. ’ but it’s unable to urge it due to his colour. This also emphasises the character of society at the time because Crooks is lonely for he has been set apart. Although most of the lads haven’t any true friends, they a minimum of getting to play cards and accompany others. Lennie, due to the colour of his skin and his friendship with George, cannot possibly understand Crooks mess. George chooses to kill Lennie at the novel’s end, realising that Lennie couldn’t stand the loneliness of being locked up during a prison or an asylum. This is often also ready to highlight truth friendship which is separated at the top which also brings an end to the novel.

In conclusion, the importance of mice and men shows that both George and Lennie both struggle to realise the American Dream by working together. Both George and Lennie are always behind each others back and had pulled his hat down on him. Lennie taking care of the vulnerable in society instead of George having to seem after him by himself. Curley wants a lot of attention and require notice from people.

Nelson Mandela once said: ‘To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.’ Throughout the story The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, the author characterizes the friendship between Jim, a black slave, and Huck, a white boy, in a way that challenges their societal stereotypes through their relationships. Mark Twain shows us that despite the Post-Civil War era when there was a robust white reaction against blacks’, race does not define one’s humanity. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn develops this theme through Jim and Huck’s character development. The story shows us how an impossible and complicated relationship between two characters begins to form during the post-civil War. Jim, a runaway slave and Huck, a misled young boy, find their way to each other countless times through the book. The friendship between the two is complicated because Huck has been taught by society and his father that black people are not equal and do not deserve to be free like white people.

On the other hand, Jim and his family living apart. Jim’s family lives on a farm close to Miss Watson’s farm, making it hard for Jim to spend time with his family whenever he wants. On their journey to freedom, the two become each other’s family.

Twain wrote a novel that unites liberty and attempts to find freedom. He composed this novel when it was the Post-Civil War era; when there was a robust white reaction against blacks. Through Hugh and Jim’s relationship or friendship; He aimed straight against racial opinions already existing in his society, opinions enlarging lynching, segregation, and the belief that slaves or blacks are inferior to whites, and they are not bright. People in the Southern community during that era of slavery thought that black people were below them. According to Southern Society, blacks will never be as intelligent as their white superiors. Whites supremacy is observable during Huck and Jim’s journey. According to his society, Huck did the unthinkable to start a friendship with a black man; worst of all, a runaway slave.

As Huck and Jim grow closer, Huck can realize just how smart Jim is: ‘he was almost always right; he had an uncommon level head, for a N…….’ (86). Huck then realized he has been told lies from society about how black people are dumb, do not have rights, do not deserve to vote, and are inferiors to white people. Huck attempts to teach Jim why French men do not speak English, but Jim was not adhering to the concept in the way Huck wanted him to. Huck thought to himself, ‘I see it warn’t no use wasting words …… you can’t learn a n…… to argue. So, I quit’ (page 90). Huck always puts confidence in his own beliefs. He believes that anybody’s ideas except his own do not influence him, but that is not true, according to the novel. The racist society Huck had grown up in had changed his ideas about right and wrong. Mark Twain gives a realistic portrait of a typical life of white people and black people through Huck and Jim Friendship. Although Huck and Jim teamed for a significant amount of time together, Huck is still heavily influenced by the racist society that brought him up. The social norms are constants challenges to their friendship that Huck and Jim have to challenge along their journey. Their friendship in this era is the prove of humanity in man.

In the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Huck and Jim have been in contact for a while because Huck stays with Miss Watson, and Jim is one of her slaves, but the development of their friendship occurs just after Huck has left his father and Jim has run away. Like many friendships, theirs evolved and changed over time due to their shared experiences. Huck and Jim were both running away from society for one reason or another. Huck was running to escape the restraints of society and conformity, while Jim was running to avoid slavery to another owner. At the time of their escape it was easy and convenient for the two of them to be together. ‘The nigger run off the very night Huck Finn was killed……’ This quote explains what the two did to get away from society. Both decided the best way was to run away from it all. Jim trusts Huck enough to tell him that he has just run away from Miss Watson. The friendship between Huck and Jim was not yet established, but Huck promises not to tell anyone that Jim is a runaway slave. He is not scared that ‘people would call him a low-down Abolitionist and despise him for keeping mum but that don’t make no difference. He ain’t going to tell’ (55). Jim’s secret is significant, and if he tells the wrong person that he is a runaway slave, he could have quickly been returned to his master back to Miss Watson. The very moment Huck tells Jim that he would not tell anyone about Jim’s secret is when their friendship begins. A bond of trust began between the two that would challenge throughout the story.

Huck likes to be alone in the woods and enjoy the silence of nature but does not like the feeling of loneliness. Huck does not like living with Miss Watson, and he definitely does not like living with his father, but with Jim, he ‘wouldn’t want to be nowhere else’ (60). Huck is lonely when in the company of his father because the two do not bond the way a father and son should. There is an emptiness in Huck’s heart that needs to be, and the care does not supply it Miss Watson has for him and not by the abandonment he feels from his parents. For Huck, Jim is the only person to fill that emptiness. Huck has now found a friend in Jim, someone that he can feel happy and free around. Huck and Jim only have one another when they are out on the raft. They watch out for each other. Huck makes sure that Jim is appropriately covered when others can identify him as a black person, and Jim makes sure Huck is comfortable and does not see certain things that he is not qualified to handle. On the raft, Huck and Jim live in their own little, sheltered society. They bond and form a relationship that Huck has not yet experienced. Huck believes that ‘there warn’t no home like a raft, after all’ (134). The raft symbolizes a withdrawal from the outside world. It gives both Jim and Huck freedom and comfort to be their whole selves. It is a place where Huck does not need to lie to feel like he belongs because he already does. The raft is the perfect separation from society. Huck has never had a real home, but the float is something that he can call home. Huck and Jim’s getting together that started at the beginning would develop into a friendship, and subsequently into a family. Huck and Jim’s friendship began as a beneficial partnership, but they became friends due to their circumstances. Twain shows how, through patience and time spent together, two people from the same society, two different races, and two different status discovered themselves and braved all social barriers.

The choice to do what we feel is right and what society teaches us to do is not always an easy one to make. Even for just a coming of age novel, the powerful message of unconditional love and following instinct proves to have better endings than doing as society demands. How exactly did a white boy and a slave start to connect in that era? The journey on the raft, island, and river were all examples of pure freedom from all aspects. Like the perception ‘nigger,’ Twain ‘s portrayal of blacks, Jim in particular, shows the tendency of the white culture to treat blacks with qualities that negate their humanity and refer to them as inferior. The friendship between a black and white man in the early 19th century is looked at poorly by Southern society, and centuries later, Southern culture still believes that there are imperfections in a relationship between a black and a white person. Southern society’s view of black people has evolved, but white people in the South believe that they are higher in command than a black person. Black people are known as criminals, drug dealers, and thieves. The friendship between blacks and whites is complicated because of what they have been taught, they are better than blacks but at the same time taught to fear them. Huck is not afraid of Jim, but he knows that in society, he holds a higher place than Jim ever will. A friendship shared between black people and white people will always be complicated until Southern culture stops thinking for people, and people can learn and think on their own.

Introduction

In Khaled Hosseini’s novel, ‘The Kite Runner,’ the pomegranate tree holds significant symbolism, representing various themes and character relationships throughout the narrative. This essay explores the profound significance of the pomegranate tree and argues that it serves as a powerful symbol of friendship, innocence, betrayal, and redemption.

Friendship and Innocence

The pomegranate tree initially represents the innocence and purity of the childhood friendship between Amir and Hassan. It serves as a sacred space where the two boys often seek refuge, sharing stories, dreams, and laughter. The tree becomes a symbol of their unbreakable bond, and the pomegranates themselves symbolize the sweetness and abundance of their friendship.

Betrayal and Loss of Innocence

As the story progresses, the pomegranate tree takes on a new layer of symbolism, reflecting the betrayal that tarnishes Amir and Hassan’s relationship. During the fateful kite tournament, Amir witnesses Hassan’s assault but chooses to betray his friend by remaining silent. The pomegranate tree becomes a witness to this act of betrayal, its symbolism transforming into a painful reminder of guilt and lost innocence.

Redemption and Healing

Later in the novel, the pomegranate tree resurfaces as a symbol of redemption and the possibility of healing past wounds. When Amir returns to Afghanistan years later, he finds the pomegranate tree withered and neglected, mirroring the ravages of war and time. Amir’s decision to plant the seeds from the tree represents his desire to reconcile with his past and seek forgiveness. This act symbolizes his journey towards redemption and the potential for healing old wounds.

The Cycle of Life and Resilience

The pomegranate tree also represents the cyclical nature of life and the resilience of the human spirit. Despite being neglected and damaged, the tree manages to bear fruit once again, showcasing the power of growth and renewal. This symbolizes the characters’ ability to overcome adversity and find hope even in the face of challenging circumstances.

Argumentative Perspective

The symbolism of the pomegranate tree in ‘The Kite Runner’ is undeniably powerful and multi-dimensional. It highlights the complex dynamics of friendship, betrayal, innocence, and redemption. The transformation of the tree’s symbolism reflects the evolution of the characters and their journeys towards self-discovery and forgiveness.

Furthermore, the pomegranate tree serves as a reminder of the consequences of our actions and the potential for redemption. Amir’s betrayal of Hassan at the tree haunts him throughout his life, driving him to seek atonement and make amends. This serves as a powerful argument for the importance of taking responsibility for one’s actions and seeking redemption in the face of guilt and regret.

Conclusion

In ‘The Kite Runner,’ the pomegranate tree represents a range of emotions and themes, including friendship, betrayal, innocence, and redemption. Its symbolism evolves throughout the novel, reflecting the characters’ growth, struggles, and search for meaning. Ultimately, the pomegranate tree serves as a profound reminder of the complexities of human relationships and the possibility of redemption, encouraging readers to reflect on their own actions and the choices they make in their own lives.

I firmly believe that there is a moment in our lives when we find our soulmate. And I’m not talking about any man, let’s be clear. I am talking about that person you met and did not like at all, but that ended up entering your life and becoming inseparable. A person who has been with you at any time when you most need it. That person you can call at any time and you know will be there. The one who has been in awkward situations for her just to do you a favor. So this is for you, friend:

First of all, I have to thank you for being the way you are. Because you let me be myself when I’m with you. Thank you for being transparent and sincere. For sharing with me not only my happy moments but also the most disastrous, shameful, and sad ones. Thank you for accepting that sometimes I don’t tell you things. For waiting patiently for me to be ready to tell you and be willing to help me get up once I fall. Thank you for being the best person I know. Seriously, you make the world a better place. At least my world. Thank you because you never expect anything in return and yet you give everything for others.Thank you for all the times we have laughed and for which we have also fought. Thanks for holding me, for being my ground wire. I don’t know what I would do without you in my crazy moments. Thank you because you always get the best of me. For making these years in which we have been friends seem much more than they are. Because during these years we have created memories for a lifetime. Thank you for reminding me that I don’t have to worry about others, but only those who love me. Thank you for being my faithful squire. You defend me before anyone, although then you throw me the anger for what I did in private. Thank you for so many things … But above all, thank you for giving me all these reasons and for being my person.

When I called my best friend she was happy, I asked her if she was busy, and she said no. I told her that I needed to tell her something, she looked kinda worried but I told her that it was not anything bad. I proceed to tell her that I needed her to not interrupt me until I was finished, and she said ok. While I was reading the letter that I wrote for her I could see how her eyes were half watery and she was smiling from ear to ear. She knows how much I appreciate her but I think I had never told her this way. After I finished reading the letter, she kept crying with happiness and how beautiful the letter was (that’s what she told me). After a few minutes, she calmed down and told me that she was sending me hugs and that she hoped we would see each other soon. She also told her mom about the letter and she thanked me and told me that she loved me as another daughter. After, we talked for a while to get caught up with our lives and right now I miss her more than anything.

For me, it was something new, something different. I think I had never shown my feelings to someone or at least the way I did. I am not a person who talks a lot about feeling or expresses them but this exercise helped me to open up more with people I can trust. I really liked this exercise, I think we should do this type of thing more often with people we love and show our gratitude for those special people. I believe this is good not only for the person who is showing gratitude but for the one that is receiving the letter too. Personally, it felt so good that my best friend liked my letter, it felt good to see how much she appreciates me and to hear it from her was really good. We never know what is going on with other people’s minds so expressing feelings can be so important to someone. Gratitude makes us appreciate the value of many things, and when we appreciate the value of these things, we extract more benefits from them; we’re less likely to take things for granted. I am glad I did this because it made me feel better about myself, I was stressed out about finals, and hearing her voice and those motivational words helped me a lot. I think demonstrating gratitude and feeling thankful was blocking other negative feelings it made me realize that someone else was looking out for me and helping me get through the day.

I feel like people think showing gratitude is easy but sometimes it is not. Because when we are thankful we are giving all the credit for the good things that have happened to us to other people. And finally, I am thankful that I did this homework because I know our friendship became an even stronger friendship and I know that it is not so bad showing your feelings to people you love.

India has always been a culture-rich place. People of different ethnicities and religion have lived together in the Indian Sub-continent. Speaking of communal harmony and friendship between Hindu-Muslim, it can be dated back to the reign of Akbar. Akbar was one of the many pioneers who encouraged Hindu-Muslim solidarity. Akbar wanted to strengthen the ties between Hindu-Muslim, he married a Rajput princess. He was one of the few Muslim person who listened to Hindu saints and also encouraged building of temples. Hindu and Muslim shared a composite culture. ‘The social relationships between these two communities were co-operatives without any severe constraint or conflict despite religious distinctions’ (Singh 8). Before the British colonizers settled in India, both Islamic and Hinduism were represented in the government. The incoming of British colonizers was one of the leading factors destroying the Hindu-Muslim solidarity.

Hindu-Muslim solidarity was also seen in the independence struggle of India. The hanging ground of Lahore Jail and Khooni Darwaza of Red Fort, both are witness of joint struggle of Hindus and Muslims. One of the first instances of Hindu-Muslim solidarity is seen in The Khilafat Movement in 1919. It was an agitation by the by the Indian Muslims, allied by Indian Nationalists. A pan-islamist political campaign to restore the caliph of the Ottoman . it was a protest against the humiliating sanctions placed on the caliph and the Ottoman empire after the first world war by the Treaty of Sevres.

The Aristotelian view of friendship is based on emotional bond between human being. He explains the concept of friendship with word “philia” which means emotional bond between two individuals. This forms the basis for all forms of the social organizations, the common efforts and the interpersonal relationships. Aristotle has categorised friendship into three categories, first is friendship based on utility, second is friendship of utility and the third is friendship based on mutual pleasure. The first one is short lived, coincidental and easily formed and easily dissolved when abilities or needs of both the people in friendship changes. In the second one, people are interested only in what they can do for themselves or can gain from each other. And in the third one, it only lasts as long as there is pleasure. In Aristotle’s view, the friendship in the primary and the real sense is that of between the good people, in so far as they are good, while the other kinds of friendships by being like the complete friendship. Aristotle’s understanding of friendship is completely based on the idea of good will, by this he means that a friend wishes only good for the other.

Derrida observes that in Aristotle, the complete friendship is a self’s creativity, who knows well what he acts. By this he means, a person knows what is good for him and what is not. Derrida begins his critical analysis with the Aristotelian idea of friendship by pointing out that, a friend takes up its position as a friend in the complete friendship by loving the other. According to Derrida, knowledge. About the complex structure of the complete friendship in the Aristotelian understanding, Derrida writes: this structure is both acknowledged and unrecognized by Aristotle, the truth of friendship, if there is one, is found in darkness.

In Navtej Singh’s short story ‘An Evening in Lahore’, it is a story about two friends, Hamid who is a Muslim and lives in post-partition Lahore, Pakistan and the narrator who is a Sikh and lives in post-partition Punjab, India. The narrator goes to Lahore, to visit the gurudwara and he tells his friend Hamid that he could only come to meet him only when he comes to visit the gurudwaras. There is a sense of loss of friendship among the two friends. These two friends went to the same college in Bombay, before 1947, they shared the same room and also participated in protests and rallies against the British colonizers.

“Hamid, what did we know that the evening by the sea was the beginning of a storm that would end in such a way that two people who shared a room would be no longer be able to share even a country’. Here we see, the narrator’s mourning of separation. Lahore was his birth place, it was his home. When he went to visit his friend, Hamid his sadness in leaving Lahore because of the Partition of India is quite evident.

The breaking of unity of Hindu-Muslim began when the Muslim League began they wanted a separate state for Muslims. Hence, Pakistan was created. The Muslim league had no agenda but to divide India, and they were successful in doing so. The creation pf Pakistan was purely based on religion. Millions of people, Hindu, Muslims and Sikhs were displacement. This division between Hindu-Muslim land was a forced and violent division, which displaced millions of people from their homeland. The concept of home got distorted. And during this period, Hindu-Muslim riots began, which lead to mass murder, brutal assaults, raping of women of both the communities and of course the communal harmony and friendship, which these two communities shared was destroyed. In “An Evening in Lahore’, Navtej Singh also mentions “Our thoughts turned to that evening in Bombay in 1946. Hamid and I were living there, sharing a room. The day the Hindu–Muslim riots broke out we were walking down the embankment by the sea on our way to our room. That evening by the sea was enchanting but fear lurked all around. Even the knives of the hawkers selling fresh coconuts were scary. Neither of us knew the faith of the coconut sellers but at least one of us could have been killed by such a knife.” The “knife” here becomes a metaphor for the riots. But despite, all this, the two friends remained loyal to each other and maybe helped each other to stay safe. In this evening in Bombay 1946, both, Hamid and the narrator were fearing the mankind. The fear was because of the communal riots but, these two friends are shown as a symbol of friendship during the time of darkness, as Derrida quotes “the truth of friendship, if there is one, is found in darkness”. Here the Aristotelian understanding of ‘complete friendship’ also holds true, which is, ‘complete friendship’ is based on when a friend wishes ‘good will’ for the other. Hamid and the narrator fear the riots, these two friends only wish good for each other. Hamid and the narrator are deeply affected by the Partition of India. The only good enough excuse the narrator can find to visit his friend in Lahore is, visiting the gurudwara. The narrator’s feeling of homelessness is quite evident in the story: “Our eyes were saying much more than our words. We used to go down this street every day to the badminton court. On this very street we had together received lathi blows during a students’ demonstration against the British rule…..”

There is also mention of communal riots in the story. How the displacement of people from Pakistan to India, and India to Pakistan lead to mass killing: “And there was the bridge on the Ravi, the very mention of which would send my wife into a swoon. After Independence a caravan of refugees was crossing this bridge and my wife’s parents were part of it. Both of them were stabbed in the back. There were many such bridges in my part of the Punjab where caravans of people moving this side had been stabbed in the back. Dusk was falling and we turned back.”

In the story, there is mention of the Ravi river and it is compared to a woman: “toward the Ravi river, the river of which a poet had said the women of Lahore with reddened lips were going to the Ravi to set it aflame.”

By reddened lips, Navtej Singh’s means the bloodshed that had to take place in order to set India free from the British rule. It was on the Ravi river Bhagvati Verma (a comrade of Bhagat Singh) died in an accidental blast, while making a bomb to destroy British imperialism. Nehru took a vow by the Ravi river to India free from the British Colonizers. Here ‘Ravi River’ becomes a metaphor of Hindu-Muslim solidarity.

Visiting the gurudwara plays and important role in the story “An Evening in Lahore”. Due to the tension between Hindus and the Muslims, the Sikhs of India could not go to the Gurudwaras located in Pakistan. The riots between Hindus and Muslims came at a cost of the Sikhs’ pilgrimage. However, the construction of the Kartarpur Corridor has made pilgrimage to Gurudwara Darbar Sahib Kartarpur visa-free. It is located near Pakistan-India border. It is one of the holiest sites in Sikhism. It is believed that Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism, died at that very spot in 16th century where Gurudwara Darbar Sahib Kartarpur is located now.

‘Since Pakistan was created our community has wanted this, two families,¬ Indians and Pakistanis,¬ are meeting again.’ (From the interview of Gurcharan Singh, a 75 year old Sikh man. He was just a child when his family moved to Sialkot, India after the 1947 Partition of India and Pakistan). The Gurudwara is located approximately, at a distance of 2.5 miles from the Indian border. Often, people had to view it from the binoculars, because of the tension between the two countries. The ‘Kartarpur corridor’ will lead from the Indian border straight to the Gurudwara with the sides fenced off. The construction of the ‘Kartarpur Corridor’ is appreciated and encouraged by the Sikh community of India, and it is being seen has a rare instance of co-operation between India and Pakistan, these two countries have fought three wars against each other after the Partition of 1947.

In Intizar Husain’s exquisite novel “Basti”, the Hindu-Muslim harmonious relationship is shown from the beginning of the novel itself. In the opening section of the novel, the narrator talks about his childhool experiences, the ideal social community he lived in, before the Partition of India. The narrator also talks about his experience of talking and being with Hindus, who were there in large numbers in his childhood. The novels shows how the two communities respected each other’s religious belief, they celebrated ‘Dushera’(a Hindu festival) and ‘Muharram’(a Muslim festival) together. In brief, Hindu-Muslim relationship was cordial and co-operative as said by Intizar Husain. Zakir remember the time spent in Rupnagar, Lahore. He turns back to pre-partition India nostalgically. Rupnagar was a place of communal harmony and “an imaginative realm of tolerance” (Bhalla 22). Rupnagr is an imaginative place created by the author, as the name suggest, it is a place of beauty, crafted by the imagination of the divine. It is also a ‘basti’ in the sense that, each of its religious communities came into being at the same time. Like “An Evening in Lahore”, the mourning of separation is also evident in ‘Basti’. It is evident when the narrator looks back and Rupnagar nostalgically and remembers his childhood. There is a sense of displacement and the concept of home is destroyed for the narrator when he is forced to shift after partion of 1947. Zakir and the narrator’s alienation from the homeland is the brutal outcome of Partition.

“How peacefully both communities lived” (Intizar Husain)

“And what the old forms love most of all is a story of benighted love. If there is an anchor in this novel which so often floats free of expectation it is the story of Zakir and Sabirah, the cousin he once dreamed of marrying. On the other side of the border, in India, she is glimpsed, with longing, from the corner of his eye—and it is entirely in his hands to turn and face her directly. In any conventional story, the ending would be precisely that moment of turning—a moment in which the novelist chooses if the story is romance or tragedy.” (Kamila Shamsie)

“Basti” does not have a closure, it leaves the reader thinking with questions of emptiness within human existence. There is a melancholic approach towards the Partition of India.

Emily Brontë, known for her literary masterpiece “Wuthering Heights,” explores the complex themes of love and friendship in her writings. With a distinctive narrative style and a deep understanding of human emotions, Brontë offers a critical examination of the interplay between these two fundamental aspects of human connection. This essay delves into Brontë’s exploration of love and friendship, analyzing how her characters navigate these relationships and the deeper implications they hold.

Thesis Statement

Through her works, Emily Brontë intricately weaves together the themes of love and friendship, highlighting their complexities, contradictions, and profound impact on human lives.

Love in Emily Brontë’s Works

1. Passionate and Destructive Love

In “Wuthering Heights,” Brontë presents a narrative of passionate and often destructive love. The relationship between Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff embodies a love that transcends time and societal norms. However, their intense emotions lead to jealousy, revenge, and ultimately, tragic consequences. Brontë challenges conventional notions of love by depicting how its intensity can both elevate and devastate individuals.

2. Unrequited Love

Brontë explores the pain of unrequited love through characters like Mr. Lockwood and Isabella Linton. Lockwood’s infatuation with Catherine is unfulfilled, reflecting the deep ache of desiring something that remains beyond reach. Isabella’s love for Heathcliff exposes the harsh realities of being caught in a one-sided affection, leading to her eventual suffering.

3. Obsession vs. True Love

Through Heathcliff’s obsession with Catherine, Brontë raises questions about the blurred line between love and possession. Heathcliff’s consuming desire for Catherine becomes a destructive force, raising concerns about the negative consequences of unchecked emotions.

Friendship in Emily Brontë’s Works

1. Nurturing and Genuine Friendships

While Brontë’s works often delve into intense romantic relationships, she also portrays the beauty of genuine friendships. Nelly Dean, the housekeeper in “Wuthering Heights,” serves as a nurturing and loyal friend to the Earnshaw and Linton families. Her unwavering support and guidance reflect the positive influence of friendship in the lives of the characters.

2. Challenging Friendships

Brontë’s exploration of friendship also includes challenging dynamics. Hindley Earnshaw’s friendship with Heathcliff undergoes a transformation from camaraderie to resentment, highlighting how external factors can strain even the strongest of bonds.

3. Complex Relationships

The friendship between Cathy Linton and Hareton Earnshaw demonstrates the potential for growth and transformation within relationships. Despite their initial animosity, they form a connection that contributes to their individual development.

Interplay between Love and Friendship

Brontë’s works often blur the lines between love and friendship, showcasing how these emotions can intersect and influence one another. In “Wuthering Heights,” Catherine’s declaration, “Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same,” encapsulates the notion of a deep connection that transcends both love and friendship. The complex bond between Catherine and Heathcliff reveals the intricacies of relationships that defy traditional categorizations.

Implications and Analysis

Emily Brontë’s exploration of love and friendship reveals a nuanced understanding of human emotions. Through her characters’ experiences, she critiques the societal constraints that shape these connections and exposes the vulnerability inherent in opening one’s heart to another. The interplay between love and friendship highlights the potential for both growth and destruction, underscoring the fragility of human bonds.

Conclusion: Unveiling the Human Heart

In conclusion, Emily Brontë’s works offer a critical analysis of love and friendship, revealing their complexities and profound impact on individuals’ lives. Through passionate yet destructive love, unrequited affections, nurturing friendships, and challenging relationships, Brontë portrays a spectrum of human connections. Her exploration of the interplay between love and friendship encourages readers to reflect on the intricacies of human emotions and the transformative power of these bonds. Brontë’s masterful portrayal of these themes continues to resonate with audiences, inviting us to explore the depths of our own hearts and relationships.

Literature grants a voice for an individual to project their thoughts, feelings, and experiences enabling them to escape from reality. In both ‘A Thousand Splendid Suns’ and ‘The Kite Runner’ the novels explore the impact of relationships in a war-stricken Afghanistan as a mechanism to convey the voice of the people in Afghanistan. Hosseini centralizes the female narrative at the heart of ‘A Thousand Splendid Suns’ to project the sufferings of the females who were forced to conform to a life of domesticity and silence. Females in Afghanistan were constantly stripped of their freedom and independence exacerbated by the seizure of Afghanistan by the Taliban. The lives of Mariam and Laila are at the heart of the novel, established as foils through their contradicting childhood, experiences from their marriage, love, and devotion lead to the formation of a beautiful female bond as they find solace in their companionship. Mariam and Laila find escapism from their traumas within their relationship that guards them from the extreme hypocrisy within the phallocentric society of Afghanistan. In ‘The Kite Runner’ Hosseini centralizes the depths of relationships he emphasizes the importance of choices in a relationship that can have everlasting consequences on the character and life of an individual. Similar, to ‘Thousand Splendid Suns’ the ‘Kite Runner’ also explores the friendships between Amir and Hassan just like Mariam and Laila. Set in Afghanistan, Amir is desperate to win the local kite competition, his loyal friend Hassan assists him to win the competition but during the competition Amir witnesses the traumatic incident of the rape of Hassan but chooses to remain silent, years later he returns to Afghanistan to gain redemption and atone for his sins. Both novels are set in Afghanistan, and demonstrate the effects of political and religious turmoil, showing victims of the repressive regime of the radical Islamic group the Taliban, whose fundamental belief in Sharia law is acknowledged by many as a misinterpretation of the Quran. In the novel, Hosseini portrays the torture inflicted on the females by the Taliban with graphic, poignant imagery. These extreme measures ensured conformity to their regime, from a feminist perspective the exploitation of females by reducing them to their biological function is a significant concern. Feminists argue about the liberation of females who can live in a society that allows them their freedom and independence this contradicts the highly patriarchal beliefs of the Taliban. Therefore the fundamental principles of Sharia law serve as an instrument that articulates a phallocentric society, manipulating the terms that are laid out in Sharia law to justify the misogynistic mindsets of the males. The males are the main beneficiaries of these measures as they protect their supreme position in society, upholding patriarchy by punishing the females. Both texts portray the justification of religion as a tool to corrupt cultural beliefs, the manipulated interpretations of the Quran are employed to uphold patriarchy, which is criticized by Hosseini in the novel.

Within both texts Hosseini explores the institution of marriage, many feminists have critiqued the concept of marriage, defined as a tool that allows patriarchy to justify the assertion of totalitarian, tyrannical control over the woman who is established as a subordinate sex to the man. Hosseini ‘In a Thousand Splendid Suns’ criticizes the forced marriage between Rasheed and Mariam, marriage is established as a trap for the females, who enter a binding contract that strips them of their freedom and individuality, forcing them to submit to the tortures of their husbands. In chapter 10, Rasheed’s confrontation with Mariam a week after their wedding reveals his demanding, misogynistic mindset when he vocalizes that ‘as of tomorrow morning I expect you to start behaving like a wife.’ The imperative sentence emphasizes Rasheed’s dictatory attitude towards Mariam, at the very beginning he establishes the expectations he has of Mariam, which is to remain within the domestic, the personal pronoun of ‘I’ further emphasizes the demanding nature of Rasheed’s character within their marriage that causes Mariam to lose her voice. Rasheed’s excessive control in their marriage is further emphasized by his question ‘What did you think?’ ‘That I’m some kind of a housekeeper.’ He patronizes her through the rhetorical question. Rasheed is not looking for an answer, but conformity from Mariam that is highlighted by the noun ‘housekeeper’, the connotations of the noun link to the domestic, for example, cooking. This evidences the totalitarian control that Rasheed has as he confines her to the home, therefore controlling her freedom. This allows Rasheed to uphold his patriarchal beliefs. In response to this Mariam submits to commands of Rasheed, she ‘swept the floors, beat the cobwebs: opened the windows to air the house.’ From a feminist perspective, this is a significant concern as the domestic sphere defines Mariam, she loses her freedom trapped within the domestic. This total control over Mariam by Rasheed suggests his fear of a female’s autonomy. This is further evidenced by Rasheed’s objectification of females ‘women come uncovered, talk to me directly, look me in the eye without shame.’ The sexual connotations ‘uncovered’ emphasize the hypocrisy towards females, he feels threatened by a woman’s loose sexual morality which emasculates him, as a result, he uses the justification of honor-based violence through ‘blood is spilled’. This is a reference to honor killing which is a punishment to the females who bring shame to the family through sexual transgression. The concept of ‘honor killing’ is a troubling phrase for feminists. The current use of the term is that ‘women embody the honor of the males’ which means that the female’s conduct reflects the males that she is associated with, therefore the male must control the female’s sexual autonomy. As a result of this belief the violence towards females is a method used to regulate and contain a female’s sexuality. The reference to honor killing asserts totalitarian control over Mariam mentally and physically. As a result, in chapter 11 Mariam is forced to wear a ‘burqa’ with regards to Afghan culture the ‘burqa’ is a form of control used to oppress the females it symbolizes the ownership of the husbands over their wives. Significantly, Rasheed quotes ‘a woman’s face is her husband’s business only’ enforces the possession of the female’s body and beauty as the ‘burqa’ contains the woman’s purity which is solely for her husband. In conservative South Asian cultures when a woman is married her body becomes the possession of her husband, therefore justifying the marital rape and domestic abuse that is inflicted by the males within their marriage. These misogynistic views towards females are criticized by Natasha Walter, she addresses the biological reduction of females through the assertion, ‘Hosseini vividly brings home what life is like for women in a society in which they are only valued for their reproduction.’ In chapter 14 after Rasheed’s marital rape of Mariam ‘he left the room’ the repetition of the phrase ‘leaving her’ emphasizes the objectification of Mariam, Rasheed uses her body as his possession which he can exploit as he pleases. Male sexual desires are portrayed as a biological imperative, a highly patriarchal perception that Rasheed is allowed to use Mariam’s body as an object to satisfy his sexual desires because he is a ‘man.’ The miscarriages that occur within their marriage evidence Rasheed’s biological reduction of Mariam he expects her to grant her a child, and when she fails to do so he becomes ‘more remote and resentful’ he ‘comes back in the middle of the night for brief rough sessions of coupling’ at this stage in their marriage Rasheed completely disregards Mariam’s consent, highlighting the totalitarian, tyrannical control he has over Mariam, which is a feminist concern as Mariam has become an object that is vulnerable to Rasheed’s sexual exploitation. Therefore, this is a critique of forced marriage by Khaled Hosseini, he uses the novel to inform readers of the tortures inflicted on the females in Afghanistan. Mariam’s story is used as a mouthpiece for Hosseini, to vocalize his concerns about the voiceless females of Afghanistan who continuously suffer from the traumas of marital rape, and young Afghan girls who lose their innocence at a premature age, as a result, they are forced to normalize the violence that is embedded within their relationship.

Contrastingly, in ‘The Kite Runner’ Hossein portrays the love marriage between Amir and Soraya which juxtaposes the forced marriage between Mariam and Rasheed. In chapter 12, Amir describes Soraya using romanticized imagery, the personification of the ‘dappled sunlight had danced in Soraya’s eyes’ and of the ‘hollows above her collarbone’ emphasizes Amir’s attraction towards Soraya, it presents the innocence and purity of Amir’s love he admires Soraya’s beauty. The personification of the ‘sunlight’ connotates the idealization of Soraya whose beauty is seen by Amir as otherworldly, this enables Soraya to have an identity and to be valued for who she is not for her biological function. This contrasts with Rasheed’s perception of females whom he perceives as possessions, Mariam is never appreciated for her efforts as it is imposed as a duty to her. Hosseini uses the relationship of Amir and Soraya to critique the concept of arranged marriage he emphasizes the importance of consent and love within a marriage relationship. This is never the situation in the marriage of Rasheed and Mariam as the marriage between them is a form of totalitarian control used to justify patriarchy. However, Soraya and Amir’s love marriage allows them to transcend into a sanctuary where both can be reliant on each other, because of the acceptance and equality that is embedded within their relationship. In chapter 12, Soraya’s confession about her elopement with an Afghan man evidences the understanding that Amir has of Soraya’s past unphased in his desire to marry her ‘Nothing you said changes anything. I want us to marry,’ Amir is accepting of Soraya’s past he embraces her regardless of her past, whereas Rasheed uses the justification of honor killing to regulate Mariam’s sexuality. Therefore, Khaled Hosseini critiques the double standards of people within an arranged marriage due to the damage it can cause mentally and physically. Hosseini vocalizes that people should be more tolerant towards consensual and love marriages.

Both texts evidence a contrasting experience of friendship, the friendship between Mariam and Laila is an escape for them into a sanctuary, which guards them against the tortures of Rasheed. In ‘A Thousand Splendid Suns’ the friendship between Mariam and Laila is a symbol of loyalty and protection in the phallocentric society of Afghanistan, this enables them to escape from emotional and physical sufferings. The marriage between Laila and Rasheed occurs due to Mariam’s inability to grant Rasheed a child, Rasheed marries Laila to legitimize Laila residing in their home. Initially, Mariam and Laila hate each other ‘Mariam took no notice of her’ she is hostile towards Laila blaming her for taking her husband but as the novel develops the women are drawn towards each other. Their friendship becomes an escape for them ‘a look past between,’ an ‘unguarded knowing look.’ Both Laila and Mariam are victims of patriarchy- their friendship transcends into a beautiful female bond that allows them the freedom to withdraw from the abuse of Rasheed. Increasingly, Laila and Mariam become strong companions who can rely on each other most significantly evidenced, when Mariam saves Laila from the animalistic abuse that Rasheed inflicts, by killing him. In Chapter 45, Mariam reclaims her independence as she ‘brought down the shovel’ she reflects on the pain and suffering that Rasheed had caused her that contradicted the love and acceptance she had received from Laila. Mariam’s unphased motive to kill Rasheed is due to her love for Laila, from the extremity of her actions she is willing to sacrifice herself to protect Laila’s life. Hence, Mariam is established as an archetypal victim of the abuses inflicted by Rasheed despite the efforts that she had invested in her relationship. The female friendship symbolizes the transcendental power of love, which enables them to escape from the trauma and abuse of their experiences. Mariam feels legitimized, her protection of Laila transcends the sufferings caused by Rasheed. Mariam dies as a martyr, her extreme act of violence allows her to obtain her identity, her last few words leave a poignant image in the minds of the readers ‘This was a legitimate end to illegitimate beginnings’ This demonstrates the willingness of Mariam to sacrifice herself for the greater good. Furthermore, Mariam and Laila’s friendship highlights the juxtaposition between their characters to emphasize that both women are victims of patriarchy. Hosseini initially establishes Mariam and Laila as foils to each other, this represents the attitudes of Afghan society towards females, through both the characters as readers we can witness the descending position of females in Afghan society. As the critic Natasha Walter argues, ‘by putting Mariam and Laila in contrast like this. trying to explain the complexities of Afghan society to the reader.’ Mariam resided outside of Herat, which was an underdeveloped, medieval city in Afghanistan, with conservative views that restricted females. This was increasingly evident after the Taliban seizure where the strict enforcement of laws confined women to the domestic closing all girl’s schools, consequently alienating the Heratis. In comparison to Herat, Kabul heavily juxtaposed the city of Herat many individuals held liberal views. As evident by Laila, she is brought up in a liberal progressive society, where people were equal in many aspects. In the 1970s Kabul was increasingly westernized; women were able to break free from extreme Islamic traditions, thus making women eligible for jobs and granting them a right to vote, they were able to enjoy the freedoms that they had previously declined. Therefore, returning to Natasha Walter’s argument Hosseini goes deep into the heart of the complexities of Afghan society which is sexism towards females.

However, in ‘The Kite Runner’ the phallocentric narrative evidences a one-sided friendship between Hassan and Amir, the complexities within their friendship lead to a breakdown of their relationship that they are unable to save. This is asserted by critic James O’Brien ‘It is this muddled unbalanced and ultimately tragic relationship (Amir and Hassan) lies at the heart of The Kite Runner’. In chapter 4 when Hassan and Amir visit the pomegranate tree which is situated in an abandoned cemetery, Amir carves out on the tree ‘Amir and Hassan the Sultan of Kabul’. This emphasizes the purity of their relationship, the innocence of their childhood memories reflects their strong friendship. The personification of the ‘shadows of the pomegranate leaves dancing’ emphasizes the comfort that the tree brings them, the shade of the tree allows them to escape into a sanctuary protecting them against the world around them. Most significant in their friendship is the symbolism of the pomegranate tree, this alludes to the biblical reference to the original sin with the pomegranate symbolizing the forbidden fruit, therefore it foreshadows the sin that Amir regrets consumes him trapping him in the hell of his conscience. Whereas the tree can also exist as a sign of hope for Amir, when he returns it allows him the opportunity to atone for his sins. Therefore, Hosseini uses the evolving friendship of Hassan and Amir to convey that being loyal and staying truthful create a solid foundation for maintaining a healthy relationship.

In both texts, Hosseini centralizes the theme of loyalty to assert that loyalty is a key element in a relationship that forms an everlasting bond. The loyalty between Mariam and Laila is reciprocal they are bound by the devotion that they have for each other. In chapter 46, Laila is desperate to hold onto Mariam she even states that she will testify for her ‘I’ll tell them what happened’. Laila is desperate to save Mariam reflecting the love and affection that Laila has for Mariam. Even during death, Mariam leaves with satisfaction and nobility, she has fulfilled her role as ‘a friend, a companion, a guardian’ loyalty has allowed her to uphold the beautiful bond that she had with Laila, allowing her to leave the world as a woman who ‘had loved and been loved back.’ Finally, Mariam leaves with dignity established as a martyr who sacrificed herself for the love and devotion she had for Laila. Similarly, Laila evidences her loyalty to the dead Mariam by going back to visit Herat, she returns to find Mariam the repeats the question ‘Is Mariam here? It has been so long! Is she here?’ emphasizes her desperation to see Mariam. This highlights that loyalty is a crucial element in maintaining a relationship.

On the other hand, loyalty within the relationship of Hassan and Amir in ‘The Kite Runner’ is one-sided Amir does not reciprocate the same loyalty and devotion that Hassan invests in their relationship, in contrast, he exploits Hassan’s integrity and sincerity. Hosseini through the depiction of the evolving friendship of Amir and Hassan highlights the importance of loyalty that maintains a healthy relationship. Hassan is straightforward in his loyalty towards Amir whereas, Amir deep down has a complex approach to their relationship. In chapter 5, Aseef the local bully tries to attack Amir and Hassan, in response Hassan pulls a slingshot to protect Amir ‘I turned and came face to face with Hassan’s slingshot’ The slingshot in this chapter serves as a powerful weapon. Despite, Hassan’s trembling hands he musters the courage to defend Amir this shows his unbound loyalty towards Amir saving him from the threat of Aseef. However, Amir does not acknowledge the efforts of Hassan through ‘neither one of us said anything as we walked home in trepidation,’ Amir’s narcissism is increasingly evident as he fails to appreciate the courage that Hassan showed to protect him. Therefore, Hosseini highlights that loyalty within a relationship lays the foundations for maintaining a healthy relationship.

In conclusion, within both texts Hosseini portrays relationships as key components to the formation of an individual’s character, emphasizing the influence of these relationships that leave a permanent mark on an individual’s life. Through ‘A Thousand Splendid Suns’ he spreads awareness of the atrocities towards the females forcing the readers to recognize the oppression of females within a phallocentric society. Similarly, in ‘The Kite Runner’ Hosseini challenges the class and ethnic divide emphasizing the burden of guilt that weighs upon Amir for marginalizing Hassan remains until he seeks atonement for his sins.

D was the most important and real friendship I’ve ever had in my life. It all started on June 27, 2018. I met a person through a friend, the most important thing about this is that the girl I met is from another country, from Honduras. Anyone could say that it is impossible to maintain a friendship or distance relationship, that it is complicated, and that everything goes wrong. Now, I personally believe that it depends a lot on how dedicated both people are to that relationship or friendship. But by then I did not know that girl well.

I remember that day perfectly, it was Mexico’s game against Germany. Mexico was losing, and my friend was speaking by message with that girl that we will call D. My friend told me that she wanted to introduce me to a person she had been talking to for a long time, she told me that she was an amazing person and that I would surely like her. When I asked my friend to tell me more about that girl, my friend mentioned that D was from another country. My first thought was that my friend was crazy if she thought that what she had with that girl was a friendship. Immediately my friend lent me her cell phone for a moment so that I could send D, a voice message in which I introduced myself. And that was the beginning of our friendship.

D and I started writing to WhatsApp more often, almost every day. There was something about her that seemed too intriguing to me, and I wanted to know her completely. Within a few weeks, I already knew many things about D and I understood that she was someone I wanted to have in my life forever. Usually, at the beginning of any friendship, it is difficult to have complete confidence in the other person, but with D everything flowed perfectly. We always had a topic of conversation, we could talk about anything and we never got tired of each other.

D knew how to make my mood improve in a matter of seconds, or on the contrary, she knew just how to hurt me. Most of the time she surprised me with small details that made me feel like the most special person in this world. And although D was not physically with me a simple ‘Good morning’ on her part made me happy my whole morning. I believed that our friendship would not last for the issue of distance and our characters. Then you realize that the love you have for a person is greater than anything, that you are willing to forget the bad things or the complications.

I understood that there are people who come into your life for a reason, in this case, D came into my life to cheer her up. I learned and I continue learning many things from her. I discovered that distance is not an impediment to starting a beautiful friendship with someone. I realized that it is worth giving the best of you to a person. It is also good to take a risk and take that first step, or to send that first message that marked the beginning of a friendship.

My name is Greggy Boy. I am a senior in high school. Everyone can agree that I am a good student and that I like to study. My favorite subjects are chemistry and biology. I am going to enter the university because my goal is to study these subjects in the future and to become a respected professional in one of the fields.

I can say that I am a responsible and hard-working student. Moreover, being a sociable person, I have many friends since I like to communicate with people and get to know new and interesting individuals. I enjoy my time at school: it is really nice to study, and the students are very friendly and ready to help. The atmosphere cannot but make me want to go there every time. I like to receive and deal with challenging tasks. I am a very enthusiastic student and I think this is a strong point of mine.

My friends say that I am a very funny and interesting girl with a good sense of humor. As soon as I meet new people who are happy to meet me, I feel extremely comfortable with them. I believe that friendship is one of the most important values in human life. We exchange new ideas, find many interesting things about each other and experience new things. I appreciate friendship and the people who surround me.

Meeting new people who support all my efforts to grow and develop my skills not only in the subjects but also in my hobbies gives me a lot of energy. Many of those friends who surround me now I met on the street while doing my hobby. I’m in love with photography, so the thing I love doing so much became even more enjoyable. I decided to take beautiful pictures of accidental people and share these photos with them by email or on social media. I feel happiness inside seeing how happy they are looking at the pictures where they are walking or sitting somewhere in the park. In this way, Liza became my best friend and we both believe that we meant to meet because she studies the same classes and we have similar life goals.

The goal I’m currently striving for is to make this world a better place to live in by starting the changes with myself. Sure, I’ve had bad experiences in my life too, but this is exactly what made me the way I am now: grateful, full of love, with a desire to study well because it will help me become a successful person in the future and have a high quality of life. I believe that it is manifesting day by day and I feel even more responsibility for what I do and where I go. With all I already have, I know that I’m on the right path and I will do my best to inspire others to live the way they feel like living as well.

Friendship is fundamental for the fruitful prosperity of each individual. It is based on the straightforward rules of belief and trustworthiness. A genuine friend is a person who will be able to continually move on after he or she confronts challenges and genuine issues. He or she continually offers a shoulder to cry on if something off-base happens. One’s friend continuously tunes in to his or her issues gives one a great piece of counsel and never talks behind his or her back. A genuine friend is never jealous of one’s achievements and accomplishments. He or she will be able to continuously tell his or her trusted friend their flaws and be without any doubt that their disclosures are secure. A true friendship is having someone who is trustworthy, caring, supportive, and is always there in his or her time of need.

A genuine friend is one who never deserts another and is an indistinguishable friend during the season of bliss and distress. Therefore We should be extremely watchful, as there are many people who can, without much of a stretch, swindle others to satisfy themselves. This person should enable one to proceed in the right way. He or she must have an understanding and a feeling of resilience to keep up a decent friendship. There must be no doubt and no mistrust in such a relationship.

Genuine friends are worth more than every one of the fortunes of the world. Kinship is doing his or her best to fulfill their companion. Companionship is everlasting, regardless. For instance, It is the greatest relationship that an individual can have in the event that he or she is faithful, tried and true, kind, mindful, and cherishing. Likewise, Genuine companions attempt to keep away from clashes and do everything conceivable to make their relations more grounded. A few people can even make forfeits and hazard their lives for a friendship.

A genuine fellowship is something that cannot be communicated with words. Kinship is having the capacity

Friendship is fundamental for the fruitful prosperity of each individual. It is based on the straightforward rules of belief and trustworthiness. A genuine friend is a person who will be able to continually move on after he or she confronts challenges and genuine issues. He or she continually offers a shoulder to cry on if something off-base happens. One’s friend continuously tunes in to his or her issues gives one a great piece of counsel, and never talks behind his or her back. A genuine friend is never jealous of one’s achievements and accomplishments. He or she will be able to continuously tell his or her trusted friend their flaws and be without any doubt that their disclosures are secure. A true friendship is having someone who is trustworthy, caring, supportive, and is always there in his or her time of need.

A genuine friend is one who never deserts another and is an indistinguishable friend during the season of bliss and distress. Therefore We should be extremely watchful, as there are many people who can, without much of a stretch, swindle others to satisfy themselves. This person should enable one to proceed in the right way. He or she must have an understanding and a feeling of resilience to keep up a decent friendship. There must be no doubt and no mistrust in such a relationship.

Genuine friends are worth more than every one of the fortunes of the world. Kinship is doing his or her best to fulfill their companion. Companionship is everlasting, regardless. For instance, It is the greatest relationship that an individual can have in the event that he or she is faithful, tried and true, kind, mindful, and cherishing. Likewise, Genuine companions attempt to keep away from clashes and do everything conceivable to make their relations more grounded. A few people can even make forfeits and hazard their lives for a friendship.

A genuine fellowship is something that cannot be communicated with words. Kinship is having the capacity to cry together. A fellowship is being silly together. It is being frantic at one another. Genuine companions are constantly prepared to shield each other from being harmed sincerely and physically. It requires investment and tolerance to assemble a solid fellowship and carry out the trust between two perfect partners. It is essential to have someone with whom one can share their considerations unreservedly.

Cooperation is crucial for the productive success of every person. It depends on the clear principles of acceptance and dependability. A real friend might be capable of consistently counting on after one goes up against difficulties and terrified issues. He or she consistently offers a shoulder to cry on, on the off-chance that something off-kilter occurs. One’s perfect partner persistently checks out their issues, gives one an awesome bit of guidance, and never talks in the face of his or her good faith. An honest-to-goodness companion is never desirous of one’s accomplishments and achievements. Therefore An extraordinary sidekick is constantly faithful to their friend and never disappoints him or her.