Juvenile Recidivism Measuring Success or Failure Essay

Juvenile Recidivism Measuring Success or Failure Essay

Different states have laws enacted to prohibit juveniles from engaging in behaviors considered a threat to society. Without such laws, many teenagers are likely to engage in alcoholism, robbery, and other crimes. Today, adolescent crime has been rising, with some of those found guilty of committing serious crimes being sent to correctional facilities. It is important to ensure that juvenile delinquents are rehabilitated before completing their incarceration period. Once the delinquents are released, they should be reintegrated into society’s mainstreams and ensure that they return to a productive life after committing a serious crime. However, the juvenile system has not emphasized implementing effective rehabilitation programs for the juveniles who are incarcerated. As a result, after serving imprisonment, some teenagers commit crimes again. Even though such cases occur, the juvenile system can successfully rehabilitate juveniles to become productive after committing serious crimes because some commit such crimes because of their low mental and emotional maturity while others want to satisfy their needs.

First, juveniles do not have mental and emotional maturity; thus, they are prone to commit serious crimes that they may not commit again after incarceration (Dobbs 3; Jenkins n.p). As a result, the system needs to implement rehabilitation programs that can equip incarcerated juveniles with skills to make them productive members of society after they are released. For instance, providing cognitive skills training can be important as it can help develop these teenagers’ minds, thus being able to make sound decisions. Further, behavioral therapy can be important in helping to change the behavior of the juveniles, thus reducing their chances of committing other offers after their release.

Second, the juvenile recidivism rate is very low, implying that juveniles can be successfully rehabilitated in the system. Even though some teenagers commit crimes after being released from the system, the number is low because many juveniles change to become better people. It is true that some people cannot change and will always commit offenses (Darbouze 108). However, since a large number of those who commit crimes end up committing other serious crimes, it can be argued that juveniles can successfully be rehabilitated in the system if there are effective programs that can help to change the behavior of those who commit serious crimes and end up in the system. For instance, one may commit a crime because they were eager to know something (Dobbs 4); thus, effective corrective measures can help make that person productive after being released from the system.

Further, the juvenile system can change the behavior of convicted minors based on their needs. Darbouze (105) contents that some juveniles commit serious crimes because of their situation, such as stealing because they lack basic needs such as food. As a result, a teenager can engage in serious crime as they try to find a way to survive or they have been under the influence of drugs. In this case, some minors may end up in the juvenile justice system because of their crimes. Providing effective counseling and addressing the issues of such juveniles can successfully rehabilitate to become productive members of society.

In conclusion, juvenile justice systems can successfully rehabilitate teenagers who commit serious crimes to become productive individuals in society. Juveniles can commit crimes because they intend to try something as their mental and emotional maturity is low. They can also commit crimes because of their situations, such as when under the influence of drugs or when they want to certain some of their needs. The rate of juvenile recidivism is very low, indicating that if the system can implement effective programs, it can successfully rehabilitate juveniles who commit serious crimes.

Strategic Failure: How Walmart’s UK Invasion Fizzled Out

Strategic Failure: How Walmart’s UK Invasion Fizzled Out

Introduction

On October 5th, 2020, Financial Times (FT) published an article called ‘How Walmart’s UK invasion fizzled out’ (Eley A. G., 2020). This publication reported that Walmart unveiled a £6.8 deal to sell ASDA to private equity group TDR Capital and two Lancashire entrepreneurs, Mohsin and Zuber Issa. The article also states that ‘Walmart failed to accomplish its initial ambitions and goals when entering European markets’ (Eley A. G., 2020). Although ASDA was not precisely a failure with a share of about 14.5% of the UK’s food sector, it struggled to upstage Tesco and has instead jostled with Sainsbury’s for the number-two position. Various factors contributed to this occurring; however, the failure involved is largely to its strategic management.

This essay aims to discuss the possible reasons for Walmart’s strategy failure in the UK and what could have been possibly done to avoid this. (Write at the end)

Company Background

Walmart is an American international retail corporation that runs large discount supermarkets, grocery stores, and warehouses; known for being the most extensive company globally by revenue and opened for the first time by Sam Walton at 44 in 1962 at Bentonville, Arkansas (Walmart, 2020). It began in its first year with $700,000 and by 1974 went up to $5.4 million. The company was rising when other firms were dealing with inflation and recession. Walmart became the youngest US retailer in 1980 to reach 1 billion in net profits. Wal-Mart continued to grow more throughout the 1980s, forcing some competitors to shut down several of their area shops. The business has diversified by opening up member shops like the Sam’s Club, smaller traditional convenience stores called Neighbourhood Markets, and eventually supercentres with a large variety of consumer products. And in 1991, Wal-Mart became the biggest store in the country.

Walmart became partners with onlineretailerjet.com with the two companies merging forces to save customers even more money and time. A subsidiary of jet.com (hey needle.com) is also covered in this merger Walmart. More than 1.2 million Sam’s club and Walmart associates get a pay raise as part of the company’s two year 2.7 billion dollars investment in its people. Also Walmart and china’s largest e-commerce company jd.com formed a strategic alliance to provide consumers across China better comprising online and offline retail. Developing economies with rising middle classes carry grater interest, in china Walmart has reached about 400 physical stores and a joint venture with jd.com one of its largest e-commerce companies. The company has also spent billions of dollars in India which dominates the online retail powerhouse Flipkart. The company pledges to become the most trusted retailer by going on specific goals by 2025, all centred on sustainability, empowering its associates and enhancing people’s lives around the world. Walmart indeed is a great and successful company carrying and helping customers, employees and business people worldwide. For the purpose of this essay is important to know this facts in order to understand why and how such a successful Walmart company failed in the United Kingdom.

Asda

The United Kingdom was once the great hope of Walmart since it had a developed retail culture. Precisely, in June of 1999, Walmart acquired ASDA for £6.7 billion. Walmart chose to retain the brand ASDA because British customers were already familiar with it. For Wal-Mart, this acquisition was because the U.S.A retailer realised that the British business had core features to ensure organizational survival, such as its above-average shop size, company culture, and a powerful clothing brand close to those seen in the U.S.A. (Steve Burt, 2001).

According to the FT article, Walmart’s arrival in Britain alarmed local rivals while causing European supermarket stocks to lose over $4 billion in market value. However, the article points out that despite its impact on other organizations at the time of its arrival, Walmart had not yet achieved its initial objectives. Figure 1 shows that although the Asda acquisition was not a total failure, the organisation failed to become the market leader in the UK and upstage in the leadership competition with Tesco but instead faced Sainsbury’s for number two position Asda has now been acquired by the private equity group TDR Capital with a deal of £6.8 million in which Walmart will have a minority equity stake. (Eley A. G., 2020)

Strategy

According to Gerry Johnson, strategy is the long term direction of an organization (Johnson, 2017). In other words, a strategy is the pattern or plan that combines the main priorities, objectives and action sequences in a company into a coherent whole where a well-developed strategy fuels the growth of a company and allocates its assets to a specific and viable role depending on its relative internal expertise and deficiencies. The annual report of Walmart mentions that one of its goals is to expand internationally while incorporating EDLP (Everyday low rates) as the company’s corporate strategy (Walton, 2020). In other terms, Walmart pursues a cost leadership market approach created to a large degree by the economies of scale derived by the organisation. The organisation has been able to do so by building a complex strategic system with strong IT investment; an effective logistics system by the proximity of retail stores with RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology; and by becoming a non-union employer (Greenhouse, 2015). In 1999 Asda seemed to be a good option for Walmart as the low cost strategy was aimed at low and middle income families, and also offered considerable non-food business, including the George brand of affordable clothing. After 2003 Walmart, now with over 1,200 international shops, had sales growth of over 18.9%, the company had been able to successfully implement its U.S. strategy after acquiring Asda. They have applied their supply chain management technology and have been able to give consumers 7 percent cheaper costs than rivals. While their shops were much smaller than Walmart’s vast ‘supercentres’ in the United States, they were significantly larger than those of their UK rivals. However, Asda has faded compared to Walmart’s operations in more aggressive markets, such as China and India (Eley A. G., 2020).

Walmart’s specific Failure in the UK

In order to understand the reasons for Walmart’s failure in the UK, it is essential to mention the concept of strategic failure. The strategic management phase requires at least three responsibilities for the management: identifying, conducting and reviewing the applicable strategy. An organisation can witness failure for many reason but the most common cause is related to inappropriate strategy execution, which is why implementation is sometimes described as a weaknesses of strategic management. Unfortunately, most company’s strategic attempts have struggled during this critical period, and companies nowadays are losing substantial capital investment.

Based on the FT article, Walmart Company had already experienced failure in other countries, of which the most notorious failure was in Germany. In 2006 Walmart came out of Germany after struggling with Aldi and Lidl and battling with labour unions. Germany was perhaps the greatest example of Walmart failing and crashing (Eley A. G., 2020). However, the same strategic mistakes can be identified from this failure in the United Kingdom; Walmart did not grasp the local market; the company applied the model which was working in the United States without taking the time to analyse and consider possible side effects they might have if that strategy did not work. The UK is different, it has a variety of innovative markets available to all its inhabitants for over a decade now where competition is evident, offering shopping and delivery online.

Another reason of failure can be found in latest media reports which acknowledge Walmart’s history of job challenges (Hotten, 2019). Employees are part of the company’s success and also recognised as a stakeholder. They have limited influence in the company’s decision making but can have a significant impact to the business directly. Walmart was considered to have ethics concerns which can be a result of their business strategy. The organisation has selected the cost leadership approach that has proven effective in focusing cost and achieving competitive edge in its business. The idea that Walmart is pressured to generate profit rather than to concentrate on its workers has culminated in several concerns and the ethics problems confronting the business. As a result Walmart’s Profits in the UK-based stores suddenly suffer a decline from 2016 to 2018 as shown in the FT article which can be appreciated in figure 2 (Eley A. G., 2020). But if Walmart had to shift the corporate strategy from cost leadership to decreased negative feedback and better turnover rates, it would radically change its basis for itself and eventually go out of business.

Leading Through Failure: Aspects And Factors

Leading Through Failure: Aspects And Factors

Failing is not the end of a journey. Rather, it is more like a checkpoint in a journey, with a promising end to the means if taken as a positive check. For someone to achieve their set goals, occasionally, failure is inevitable. The secret to succeeding is taking failures positively and getting focused towards achieving goals. Failures give us lifetime lessons and gives us more courage to face challenges that occur in the journey towards success. Leading through failure is ultimate challenge for our current leaders because of the experience through their mistakes, falling and getting up hence making them handle leadership in the right way and perform their responsibilities in the right way for the benefit of their people hence giving back to the society . Many a times after accepting and owning their failures, leaders tend to be more loyal in their leadership making them gain more trust and tittles to be remembered by the coming generation.

In order to emerge as an outstanding leader and surpass failure, the following qualities are inevitable

  • Determination: A determined leader or an organization will always find the energy to surmount the failures which they have been true. Having well defined paths to follow in the implementation of policies is essential in the quest for success.
  • Honesty and transparency: making honest decisions for the benefit of an organization has to be on the diary of every leader. Accepting failure and working on solutions and way forward for the organization. Avoiding unclear and shady deals is also advised if an organization is to pull through failure.
  • Confidentiality: Keeping the records, data and policies of an organization in custody only of the organization. This will help build trust and ensure the implementation is without any leaks or interference.
  • Integrity: a leader should practice integrity in the sense that every activity done by an organization is corrupt-free and has followed the right procedure. It should satisfy the stakeholders and other partners. The leader should be principled and have an undivided stand if the organization should overcome previous failure.
  • Competence: to be a leader in a field or a discipline requires creativity and the quality of competitiveness. To be at par with others, a leader must be very competitive so as to secure the top places in any given field.
  • Professionalism: a leader should apply work ethic in their quest to achieve set targets. Skills pertaining to the profession should be employed. The leader should always be accountable for any mess, loss or failure.

Getting over failure and going on to become one of the leaders in a field involves sacrifices, strategies and having a work plan. Failures that leaders undergo often unleash their greatness buried deep within. A leader should be ready to take risks and learn from mistakes. In order to get over failures, a leader should practice the following:

  • Leaders should not blame contributing factors of production. They should rather assess the mistakes and find solutions that will improve their working.
  • Leaders should be able to transform failures to success by taking them positive. A leader should not shy off or disown their own mistakes in the making, because when they do so, they will be reducing their productivity.
  • Learning from mistakes from other organizations as an anticipatory move will always get them a stride ahead of their competitors.
  • Working with the mistakes as they are erased eventually. Mistakes and failures have a positive side when viewed from the positive spectrum of solving problems. As the go about their daily work, it is paramount that they endure failure the same time and with the same energy they use to compile success, profits and returns.
  • The risks taken when the failures were incurred should not be abandoned. It might be that the risks were taken in the wrong approach. And so the leaders should consider taking the same risks that caused the failure but this time increase the stakes, factors and capital in order to get better results.

Taking the lead also means that an individual or an organization should take into consideration new concepts and approach to policy implementation. If the previous policies failed then new policies should be formulated. Functional and non-functional requirements should be identified, a feasibility study done by an analyst, and a final draft of how the organization will implement its policies should be selected.

Failure to plan is always almost a suicidal mission. An organization that fails to have a plan is definitely planning to fail in disguise. A well-defined plan should be incepted and conceptualization done. The plan should then be implemented as formulated, and in the best and most feasible way. A leader who fails to plan will be inviting failure into their leadership legacy because there will be uneven allocation of resources and factors of production.

Leading by failure entails the agility and courage to undertake a certain endeavor with all the anticipated huddles and hindrances. When hit by a tsunami of failures and failed attempts, a leader should be able to pick up the pieces and brave on into the storm of, say, economic instability, market fluctuations and inflations. Failure does not dictate the end.

As for the record, the end justifies the means. Many people who fail often pick themselves up and end up succeeding. A classic example is that of Thomas Edison, who is often credited for inventing the light bulb. History records that he attempted for almost 999 times, before getting the breakthrough at the thousandth time. It all comes back to the idea of leading through failure.

In conclusion, leading is not a walk in the park. It will always have pitfalls, and numerous failures . individuals with undisputed resolutions will always laugh last. It means that to lead, failure is not an option. The ultimate test is getting over failure, summing up all the missing pieces of the puzzle, using the failing points to generate answers and solutions. Failure is inevitable, but the challenge is; can you pick up and emerge a leader amid all the circus and failures?

Projects Failure: Reasons And Preventions

Projects Failure: Reasons And Preventions

Whenever a project is started, it may either succeed or fail. Successful projects are those that are completed within the project timelines, with the forecasted budgets, and are likely to satisfy the clients. Failed projects are those that are late, are expensive than expected, and are unsatisfactory (Kerzner, 2013). An example of a failed project I know entailed the construction of a water supply project for the world’s poorest-in Africa. Various factors led to the failure of the project. The first aspect entailed lack of stakeholder input. The water supply project was to be funded and sponsored by a non-governmental organization to supply water to the local community. The project failed because the relevant stakeholders did not input the necessary efforts and resources. The second reason for failure was unclear objectives. The non-governmental organization foreseeing the project did not have a clear understanding of what it wanted to achieve with the project once it was complete. For example, there were no piping project or storage facilities in place to help in the distribution of the water. Besides, it was not clear who the targeted community were.

The third reason for failure was insufficient planning. There was no clear indication of how the resources for project would be channeled and who would manage the project. Besides, there was no local community involvement, which led to incoherence and thus failure. The fourth reason for failure was unrealistic timeframes and schedules. The project managers allocated little time than required for the project of that nature, which meant rush and thus poor quality of work, which did not meet the recommended standards. The final reason for the project failure entailed inadequate resources. The project was started, but it stalled midway reason being that the resources need to finance such an expensive project were not available.

The project management processes in which the project failure occurred were scope definition and resource planning. In defining the scope, the project team failed to define the exact resource requirements in the sense of time, finances and skills. Had this stage been comprehensive, then the project would not have failed from inadequacy of resources and time. Besides, poor resource planning comes into play. The project team should have initiated a project whose resource requirements were consistent with those at hand. Had this been done, the project would have succeeded without a complaint for inadequate resources.

To prevent failure of similar projects in the future, various recommendations can be adopted for project plans and project management activities. Firstly, a project should be well planned before initiation using a project definition document. A project team should not jump in and start a project, but it needs to first describe the project and define its deliverable (Kerzner, 2013). The planning should make clear of objectives, scope, and risks. Secondly, project teams should ensure that they have the right technologies, adequate resources, and are well equipped with skills and expertise. With these, there is no chance that the project will fail. Finally, project failure can be prevented by encouraging collaborative participation by all stakeholders (Kerzner, 2013). Duties, roles, and responsibilities should be well defined so that each stakeholder is assigned to particular assignments, and failure or success is merited at the stakeholder’s level. When the stakeholders are well informed of what they are supposed to do, the project is more likely to succeed than fail.

Reference

  1. Project Failures. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.wflrating.org/project-failures/
  2. Paulson, T. (2013, January 25). The problem of cheap water (fixes). Retrieved from http://www.humanosphere.org/basics/2013/01/the-problem-of-cheap-water/
  3. Smith-Nelson, M. (2013, August 23). Guest Op-Ed: Water projects everywhere, but little accountability. Retrieved from http://www.humanosphere.org/basics/2013/08/guest-op-ed-water-projects-still-lacking-accountability/
  4. Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Project Failure: Potentials And Solutions

Project Failure: Potentials And Solutions

Introduction

Most administrations experience projects that fail at some point or another. Whether the project not meeting the programmed deadline, project going over budget, or a project not producing favorable or expected results, plans not going accordingly, and thus failed in one way or another. Numerous drawbacks that can cause a project to derail, there is never a hundred percent chance that a project will workout for an administration. Most administrations have their fair share of success and failure. A project is very unpredictable, unforeseen events occur when we least expect them, projects will fail and when that happens there must be a proposed solution for every failure that strikes the administration. Three reasons that can potentially cause a project to fail is poor planning, communication and risk management. I plan to discuss these reasons looking at each failure as well as propose a possible solution that could help eliminate and turn initiative into successful projects.

Potential Failure # 1

Poor planning is reason one for a project failure. There are many reasons why poor planning can occur, initial requirements examination has been poorly down; end users have been known to be brought into the very end, overgeneralized projects; control change lacking communication that is among stakeholders all show poor results. As the saying goes: “if you fail to plan, you plan to fail.” Projects need to be taken seriously, a main reason why a project fails is poor planning, falling behind schedule, and missing or overlooking deadlines. (Time Thoughts. Resources for Personal Career & Success. Retrieved May 26, 2018.) When there isn’t proper planning, it could be difficult to comprehend what it would take to complete a project efficaciously.

Proposed Solution

Poor planning is avoidable, guaranteeing that everyone involved on the project is on the same page and has a clear understanding of the overall vision, priorities, deadlines and knowing funds that will be used or spent. It is imperative to recognize a timeline and agenda that will reflect on the work requirements, deliverables, breakdown requirements and projects milestones. Development and approval should be done by management from the very beginning of every project. Ensuring that the party involved in the project is on the same page, has a clear understanding, aware of funds available as well as always knowing when the deadline is makes poor planning avoidable. Identifying a timeline is important it would reflect work requirement schedules, project goals as well as deadlines. Clear communication of what is expected, doing what and when what is due allows a team to be on the same page.

Potential Failure # 2

Communication is an important key link that happens amongst consumers and producers. Communication is not only important link but it’s important aspect for when it comes to how managers and executives communicate to one another and the rest of the administration. Managers are those who open the path for others through guidance, it should set an example of the outcomes of what is to be expected when it comes to communicating to other team members, managers, and everyone overall. Appropriate feedback is required to suitably guide a team for clear communication. Scheduling tools is very helpful for projected commitments. For possible outcomes, data should be foreseeable when it comes to meeting completion dates and how outcomes allow changes. Projects will fail due to miscommunication, communication between a team can and will be a part of project failure.

Proposed Solution

It is common for failure to be acknowledge when it comes to the most inconvenient stage of a project. Communication is extremely important amongst the team. It is one of the key guidelines to effectiveness. Subtle ways of communicating include body language, arrangement of furniture and the workspace. When miscommunication transpires, acknowledging and resolving these inconsistencies encourages a team that will assure project plans. If a discrepancy is caught early on, it can be stopped and thought out figuring out what has gone wrong allowing to fix before it becomes a bigger mess than it can become later down the road. A clear strategic plan needs to be planned out to avoid miscommunication which would be clearly thought out and planned. With a clear strategic plan, the process can be followed from the beginning of a project confirming managers to understand the process as well as efficiently communicating when it becomes necessary. The duty of communicating project hopes all employees are dynamic, communication will always be important to keep everyone on the same page.

Potential Failure # 3

Lastly, risk management can cause damages that eventually have potential to happen or give high possibilities of the damages that can occur during a project. A plan should always be modified during the current plan, if modified, it gives the identity of the project risks. Alteration of cost where all cost would be considered in the plan. Some of the cost will include; deterrence cost. This is typically the cost which is sustained when it comes to preventing risks that occur in modified plans. This also insures performance quality guarantee to the project. Internal project failure has its expenses. This expense is the projects team that will incur beforehand the project once its completed. Incurring while there’s failure to reach the project that is supposed to achieve a newly changed risk management planning the potential damage. Some damages include fire or loss of property that affects the project negatively causing it to disrupt the project.

Proposed Solution

Modified plans will consider factors of all potential damages being modified in the risk management plan giving it strategies that are meant to develop moderation of the risk. Allowing development tactics to assist and help all projects to create revenue.

Conclusion

In closing summary, project failure is unavoidable no matter the workplace, atmosphere, or organizational setting. Without the cooperative effort that happens to share the knowledge or information that focuses on personal gain, trusting the forefront of completed task factors, distinguishing and remembering the “why” for a project’s presence, mission success not possible to happen. By distributing all the information with one another, trusting within the organization, and working together to carefully strategize a project, looking over all difficulties giving credibility in its needs and values to ultimately result in an overall victory and team success. There will be several reasons why a project will fail in an administration, but its important to always be knowledgeable of possible failures a project could fail.

Reference

  1. Brown, K. A., Hyer, N. L., & Ettenson, R. (2013). The question every project team should answer. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55 (1), 49-57. Retrieved from – proquest-com.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/docview/1438818327?accountid=35812
  2. Gal, Y., & Hadas, E. (2015). Why projects fail: Knowledge worker and the reward effect. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6 (4), 968-977. doi:

Google Glass: Analysis of Reasons for Failure

Google Glass: Analysis of Reasons for Failure

Many great scientists and technology aficionados have claimed the theory that in a non-distant future the range and power of technology will exceed humanity. Many of the emerging technologies in twenty first are substantiating this claim by bridging the gap between definition of machines and humans, i.e., physical world and virtual world.

The contemporary world is advancing at a very fast pace in the avenues related to artificial intelligence, augmented reality and virtual reality. The concept of ‘smart’ technologies primarily originates from the aforementioned concepts. The major products in the ‘smart’, categories include smartphones and wearable devices like smartwatches, smart rings etc. with smart glasses being one of the latest entrants to this category.

The following section differentiates the conceptual difference between augmented reality and virtual reality. This differentiation is necessary to be drawn out to illustrate concepts in following parts of the project.

  • Virtual reality: in this the device in question generates a virtual world for the user to interact in. The users are immersed into the virtual world, where their movements and action create stimulus and consequently response in the virtual world with minimum to zero interaction with the real world. Ideally, the user is not affected by any other external light source from the real world. A completely apt but fictional example of fully developed virtual reality would be ‘Holodeck’ from the famous movie ‘Star Trek’.
  • Augmented reality: it is similar to virtual reality but with some major inherent differences. In this the real world is augmented or enhanced by the device in use. Essentially, the device provides supplementary light source that does not limit real world perception but gives additional visuals, features and functions that the user can view and interact with. Basically, it establishes a communication link between user and the computing device.
  • Diminished reality: this is novel and nascent concept that is used to describe the control of device over the users’ reality and the capability to mask or alter the real or digital information.

This paper emphasizes on the product Google Glass that is based and developed on the concept of augmented reality, virtual reality and diminished reality primarily undertaken by the company Google. Although the product was conceptually superior, the product failed to become a commercial success in the present tech-market.

The objective of the report is to study and analyze the reasons for failure of the product and why the product could not create the expected repercussions. The first model of Google Glass can be regarded as a complete failure, whereas the upgraded version, i.e. Google Glass 2.0, can be regarded as partial success as it is used quite extensively in industrial applications.

Two major reasons are attributed to failure of the product in the market. The first one is privacy issues. Privacy violation was posing to be a big problem as the product has capability to breach the privacy of non-users without their consent. The regulations and clauses regarding such issues does not exist now, which makes the use of the product commercially very cumbersome. The other reason that is attributed to the failure is its physical design as it is extremely fragile and not robust for the users. Another contributing reason is the market price for the glass was quite higher than what the general demography of potential users could afford. These reasons along with other factors will be scrutinized in the following part of the report to arrive at a suitable conclusion.

Business Background

X-the Moonshot factory was created by google in 2010 as an American semi-secret research and development facility. It operates as a branch of Alphabet Inc. “Google Glass is created by Google X Lab, which operated in Google on other forward-looking innovations. In 2011, the press published the first reports about Google’s ambitious project to create a wearable computing system. On 18 August 2011, Google submitted a patent application to the United States Patent and Mark Office, issued on 21 February 2013 under the number 20130044042” (Klein et al., 2015).

Google Glass was developed with the intention of providing omnipresent computing goods. It is estimated to be $200 USD to manufacture one glass, but it was about $1500 USD on the market to buy one glass. Google Glass could take pictures, record videos, run specific android apps, and use them to make video calls. It could also retain information that a user receives and show results that are relevant to the user experience this instantly. Users gave the commands through voice and some through hand motion-based actions to run certain actions through the window. Google Glass has been a product that can’t fit into any market. Designers and venture stakeholders felt the innovation will take a big step in as a commodity that users would have to see and believe in, but the project failed as holders of Google Glass never wanted to wear the glass in public forum as the product’s design itself became a confidentiality issue and people were also reluctant to wear the glass in social life.

The Glass proved to be completely unreliable as a technology made by a tech giant like google with the finest engineers in the world.

Google Glass’s price was highly-priced and even the normal tech users struggled to buy one from the field. The functions behind a glass were a major failure for both the product and the project involving a variety of staff. In reality, sometimes in the public forum buyers are ridiculed when they saw wearing Google Glass.

The following four factors were the cause of glass failure: functionality, cost, design and privacy.

Technical Description

The Google Glass consist of the following hardware specification:

  1. Micro-USB: used for Glass charging. This port can also be used for connecting USB accessories like headphones.
  2. Compatibility: it is compatible with both phones and tablet. Needs phone to have Google Glass App with GPS and SMS messaging facility.
  3. Connectivity: Wi-Fi -802.1b/g Bluetooth.
  4. Camera: photos -5Mb and video 720p.
  5. Storage: 12GB with cloud storage.

Standard Criteria

A business’ metrics for success and failure depend on how quickly a company meets the end-user client. A plan may fail if the project manager fails to meet any of the above criteria for success. “Success at the same time is, overall, seen as a collaborative achievement involving joint-team action to identify problems and solutions to these problems and taking action to effectively deliver action, while learning from the process and fine-tuning strategy and tactics employed in a constructive and reflective way” (Steinfort & H.T. Walker, 2007). Google Glass struggled because none of its clients could be pleased with the venture and the service became rejected on the market. The data privacy was another major problem that the project team didn’t think about the consequences. Another major issue is information protection that the project team didn’t care about the consequences.

Success Criteria

A design success depends on the following factors with which the venture could last longer, such as pre-or post-project selling duration, value deliverables, spent cash and financials, and customer satisfaction.

  1. Quality: work quality depends on the successful completion of the project.
  2. Time: a plan should be delivered on time and should be reviewed on schedule upon completion of the project.
  3. Money: funding for any plan is an important issue. Finance requires one money for making the work in two different ways, such as good use of cash for asset and then the money involved upon completion of the project. The money that comes to the company as a benefit.
  4. Customer satisfaction: the main goal of any successful project relies on consumer satisfaction at the end when the consumer gets it on schedule with what is needed.

Failure Factors

  1. Technology/ technical domain. The use of inappropriate technology or the application of incorrect technical expertise will lead a plan to collapse, and even at the deployment point the project would crash. External structure was another reason for failure in Google Glass. “Broken or damaged chances are more. Though Google is expecting these glasses to be as modest as achievable, they are kind of breakable. Users will have to handle it with care” (S. Mankar, 2015).
  2. Customer rejection. The underlying variable in the loss of a plan is the amount of negative feedback from consumers/clients that are contrasted with the acceptance rate. After the release of Google Glass, consumers assumed the apps might create a problem in social circumstances as there were data privacy concerns and customers started to oppose the item culminating in the collapse of the venture.
  3. Communication. Incorrect interaction is also important when considering task failure. The interaction with customers, customers, shareholders and both internal and external project units must be clear from the beginning to the end.
  4. Project management and preparation. Plan planning involves appropriate plan scheduling and prompt implementation.
  5. Cost factor. The project cost is yet another factor of project performance and the cost of the project covers both within and outside the organization. Goods such as Google Glass are known to be produced of high standard material and assumed to be manufactured for long-lasting in high-end products, but the cost involved was varying and product quality could not suit the marked costs. “The current price for Google glasses is somewhere between US$500 and US$1500. But mostly they are made with commonly available parts or that are easy to manufacture” (Garg, Bhardwaj & Gupta, 2015).

Conclusion

The project’s reliability and performance are of primary importance. The project must be made sure that it is developed in accordance with the project’s prerequisite and performance, efficiency and usability. The plan should be managed and adequately controlled. During the design phase, the stakeholders and consumers involved in the project should be clear as they are the viable market for the organization’s company. The project’s context is critical and needs to be properly described and understood. A small change in specification variance would have a dramatic impact on the design. The company should also have a highly skilled technical team as well as business team and operate hand-in-hand within the venture to prevent any threats or problems during the design.

Google Glass has become a disaster venture, and google has re-initiated the campaign and rendered glasses with higher end quality for business applications. Google Glass version 2.0 has now seen a significant growth in the consumer software industry.