QUESTIONS 3 – In your answers to questions 2 and 3, you MUST draw on
a range of
QUESTIONS 3 – In your answers to questions 2 and 3, you MUST draw on
a range of academic literature and organisational examples to support your
discussion.
3. To what extent do you agree with the statement that virtually all aspects of
marketing – from the development of new products to pricing, promotion and
sales – raise ethical questions that do not always have an easy answer?
Public Health Brief #3
In this assignment, you will write a policy brief of appr
Public Health Brief #3
In this assignment, you will write a policy brief of approximately 1,500-2,000 words that makes a focused argument in response to the following prompt:
How do we know when the pandemic is over? Which experts should be in charge of making this evaluation? What benchmarks should they use? What does life look like for the average person when the pandemic is over? Did society undergo any significant changes during the pandemic that are evident when it is done?
The nitty gritty details:
Your policy brief should accomplish the following:
Clearly state YOUR criteria for deciding when the pandemic is over.
Give examples from class showing why your chosen criteria are appropriate. (Through the sources uploaded)
Make clear recommendations for public health officials or politicians about why they should adopt your criteria and what they should do about it. This may include instituting specific public policies, funding particular services, establishing or renewing public health rules, making long-term preparations or infrastructure investments for future public health problems, or other steps.
Make sure your recommendations take into account any relevant changes and experiences people have gone through during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Support your position and/or recommendation(s) with at least 3 citations from the sources I uploaded, and more from outside as you wish.
Please read the instructions on this page carefully and ensure that you follow
t
Please read the instructions on this page carefully and ensure that you follow
them exactly.
This assessment contributes 60% of the marks for the module. ALL questions carry equal
marks.
Answer ALL questions in ONE WORD file – please do NOT take a separate file for each
question as you will not be able to upload 3 separate files to Canvas.
ALL questions are compulsory.
You should be able to check your work for potential referencing concerns by uploading to
Canvas (which automatically links to TurnItIn) before final submission.
You DO NOT need to include a final reference section and/or bibliography for this assessment.
BUT, all of your work in each answer must be yours and ALL sources must be appropriately
acknowledged in your answers.
Save your submission using BOTH your Name and Student Number
You MUST submit your FINAL Word document to Canvas on or before 5.00pm.
If you are having any difficulties, then please contact the School Office and the Module
Coordinator immediately
QUESTIONS 2 AND 3 – In your answers to questions 2 and 3, you MUST draw on
a range of academic literature and organisational examples to support your
discussion.
2. Critically evaluate the appropriateness of the following statement,
‘management at all levels must not sit tight, with fingers crossed, just hoping
that moral dilemmas will be self-solving’ (Gully et al, 2006).
You will have the full 96 hours (Thursday, December 14 – Sunday, December 17) to
You will have the full 96 hours (Thursday, December 14 – Sunday, December 17) to complete TWO essay questions. This gives you flexibility to work on your essays when it is most convenient for you. Even if you submit the essays, you can change them and resubmit them up until the deadline.
The exam is open book and open notes. We therefore expect thorough answers on the essay questions.
Please keep in mind that you need to put everything in your own words. That is how we know that you actually understand the material. You cannot just copy the slides or the articles. (That would be plagiarism.) If there really is no other way to make your point, and you absolutely need to quote the slides, lectures, or readings, you must use quotation marks around the quote and give an in-text citation including the author’s name and page number if there is one.
Please get right to the point in answering essay questions. For example, you do not need to have an introductory paragraph or a concluding paragraph. Just answer each part of the question. You should expect to have roughly 3-4 paragraphs, but it is okay if you have a bit more. The number of paragraphs does not matter. Your goal should be to answer the question completely without including irrelevant information.
Note that you are expected to do some original thinking by analyzing an author’s position or by explaining which author’s position you think is stronger on some issue. This requires a substantial response. You must engage meaningfully with authors’ arguments, providing reasons defending your assessment of an author’s position or of whose position is stronger on some issue. To do this well, you need more than a sentence or two. It will take a full paragraph.
IMPORTANT: You will only get credit for engaging with the assigned articles. Thus, presenting what the authors say in articles not assigned for class will NOT earn you credit. For this reason, I strongly advise you to avoid internet research, as this has often led students astray. Instead, please learn from the lectures.
Plagiarism/AI Chatbot Warning for essays: If you copy an author’s words without quotation marks, or if your response is copied in full or in part from another source (e.g., Quizlet, another student’s work, my lecture slides), this counts as plagiarism, and you will fail the exam. If you use ChatGPT or another AI chatbot to write your essay, you will fail the exam. Please note that we will check the essays using plagiarism and AI detection tools.
Grading Rubric: Exam Essay Rubric.pdfDownload Exam Essay Rubric.pdf
Please email us IMMEDIATELY if you run into any issues.
BEST OF LUCK! 🙂
——————————-
NOTE: At the end of each essay, you must sign your name, verifying that the essay is your own work. You should write the following: “I certify that this essay is my own work alone. I did not plagiarize anyone else’s work or use AI to write this essay.” You must then sign your name. This can be done easily in Word using the “draw” function. Your essays will be considered incomplete without this.
Essay 1: Choose Question A or B
A. Daniels and Engelhardt disagree on whether there is a moral right to health care. For each of these authors, state their position and explain their argument for that position. Whose position do you think is stronger, and why?
Note: In answering this question, be sure to define keywords used by each of the authors, so that we know that you understand their arguments.
OR
B. Glannon and Savulescu disagree on the moral permissibility of genetic enhancement. For each of these authors, state their position and explain their argument for that position. Whose position do you think is stronger, and why?
Note: In your answer, you need only discuss Glannon’s main argument for his position, but for Savulescu, briefly discuss all three of his arguments for his position. Also, be sure to highlight the different moral principles that lead them to different conclusions on the moral permissibility of genetic enhancement.
Essay 2: Choose Question C or D
C. Marquis and Thomson disagree about the moral permissibility of abortion in cases of pregnancy due to contraceptive failure. For each of these authors, explain their position and their argument for their position in cases of pregnancy due to contraceptive failure. Whose position do you think is stronger, and why?
Note: In your answer for Thomson, be sure to discuss the hidden assumption used by abortion opponents and what the right to life consists in according to Thomson. Also, Marquis does not explicitly discuss cases of pregnancy due to contraceptive failure. You need to apply his argument to this kind of case.
OR
D. Brock and Callahan disagree on the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia. For each of these authors, state their position and explain their argument for that position. Whose position do you think is stronger, and why?
Note: In your answer for Brock, focus on the moral arguments that he discusses for and against voluntary active euthanasia, not the public policy arguments. Also be sure to discuss these authors’ positions on whether there is a moral difference between killing and letting die.
——————————-
Rubric
Exam Essay Rubric (1)
Exam Essay Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEssay 1
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The essay is at least three paragraphs (of approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences) and displays an excellent understanding of the arguments and concepts in the readings. All parts of the question are answered in sufficient detail without irrelevant information. The essay also demonstrates high-level critical thinking and analysis and uses strong reasons to support its arguments and positions. Citations are used correctly and appropriately.
18 to >16.0 pts
Very Good
The essay is at least three paragraphs (of approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences) and displays a very good understanding of the arguments and concepts in the readings. All parts of the question are answered in sufficient detail but may contain a bit of irrelevant information. The essay also demonstrates strong critical thinking and analysis and uses reasons to support its arguments and positions. Citations are used correctly and appropriately.
16 to >14.0 pts
Good
The essay is at least three paragraphs (of approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences) and understands the key arguments and concepts in the readings but may misunderstand other aspects of the readings. All parts of the question are answered in sufficient detail but may have irrelevant information. The essay also demonstrates some critical thinking and analysis but needs to improve in this area. Citations are mostly used correctly and appropriately but may have one or two errors.
14 to >12.0 pts
Need Improvement
The essay may be less than three paragraphs or the paragraphs may be less than approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences. It misunderstands some of the key arguments and concepts in the readings. Most parts of the question are answered but perhaps not all, and the essay may contain irrelevant information. The essay demonstrates little to no critical thinking and analysis. Citations may not be used correctly and appropriately.
12 to >0.0 pts
Marginal
The essay may be less than three paragraphs or the paragraphs may be less than approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences. It misunderstands many of the key arguments and concepts in the readings. Many parts of the question are not answered, and the essay may contain irrelevant information. The essay demonstrates no critical thinking and analysis. Citations are poor or absent.
0 pts
N/A
No essay, or it was plagiarized
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEssay 2
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The essay is at least three paragraphs (of approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences) and displays an excellent understanding of the arguments and concepts in the readings. All parts of the question are answered in sufficient detail without irrelevant information. The essay also demonstrates high-level critical thinking and analysis and uses strong reasons to support its arguments and positions. Citations are used correctly and appropriately.
18 to >16.0 pts
Very Good
The essay is at least three paragraphs (of approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences) and displays a very good understanding of the arguments and concepts in the readings. All parts of the question are answered in sufficient detail but may contain a bit of irrelevant information. The essay also demonstrates strong critical thinking and analysis and uses reasons to support its arguments and positions. Citations are used correctly and appropriately.
16 to >14.0 pts
Good
The essay is at least three paragraphs (of approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences) and understands the key arguments and concepts in the readings but may misunderstand other aspects of the readings. All parts of the question are answered in sufficient detail but may have irrelevant information. The essay also demonstrates some critical thinking and analysis but needs to improve in this area. Citations are mostly used correctly and appropriately but may have one or two errors.
14 to >12.0 pts
Need Improvement
The essay may be less than three paragraphs or the paragraphs may be less than approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences. It misunderstands some of the key arguments and concepts in the readings. Most parts of the question are answered but perhaps not all, and the essay may contain irrelevant information. The essay demonstrates little to no critical thinking and analysis. Citations may not be used correctly and appropriately.
12 to >0.0 pts
Marginal
The essay may be less than three paragraphs or the paragraphs may be less than approximately 5-7 well-constructed sentences. It misunderstands many of the key arguments and concepts in the readings. Many parts of the question are not answered, and the essay may contain irrelevant information. The essay demonstrates no critical thinking and analysis. Citations are poor or absent.
0 pts
N/A
No essay, or it was plagiarized
20 pts
Total Points: 40
You can choose one of the following movies or articles, which, includes the orig
You can choose one of the following movies or articles, which, includes the original “Wall Street” movie. This case is the first Wall Street Movie, with Michael Douglas. Another choice can be the movie “Glen Gary Glen Ross.” This is the original Glen Gary Glen Ross movie with Jack Lemmon, Kevin Spacey, and others. Another possible choice includes “The Crooked E” the docudrama dealing with the Enron collapse, or The Exxon Valdez docudrama entitled “Dead Ahead.” You will analyze the movies as if it were a written case study and reach a conclusion. Failure to identify the critical issue(s) of the case will result in a significantly reduced grade. The expectation is a paper complying with APA 7th requirements with a minimum of 8 pages not counting the cover, contents, appendices, references, etc. Do not use words or phrases such as I, we, or I think. The essay should give information about the main ideas of the movie or article and how they relate to the course, “Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility”.
In addition to a paper (completed last week), students will
also submit one arti
In addition to a paper (completed last week), students will
also submit one artistic work that they have created and that directly relates to the topic
of their paper. This “artifact” should be a direct response to the piece analyzed in your
paper, but now engaged in a more personal, artistic, and creative manner than the
traditional research paper. The term “artifact” was specifically chosen to be as vague as
possible. Therefore, possible artifacts include, but are by no means restricted to: a poem,
a song, a video, a piece of visual art, a dance, a podcast episode/radio-show, etc. This
artifact should be something that can in some sense be uploaded onto CelticOnline (the
original is not necessary, high-quality photos, videos, etc. can substitute). The options are
endless, the key is to be creative! Artifacts will be graded based on the care evidenced in
their creation and the extent to which they engage with the topic of the paper.
i have attached my paper
For this short paper assignment, create an ethical leadership development progra
For this short paper assignment, create an ethical leadership development program for the Abundance XYZ Corporation. Use what you know about existing leadership programs in your company and others you have experienced. Your paper should answer the following questions:
How would you transition the existing training modules that are built on behaviorist principles to focus on deeper development that explores self-awareness and perceptions?
How would you add individual values to the organizational values in the modules?
How would you design an ethical leadership development program differently so that ethical leaders are continuously developed, tracked, and acknowledged?
This is a persuasive essay.
Number of pages: 5 pages, double-spaced.
Topic — Ab
This is a persuasive essay.
Number of pages: 5 pages, double-spaced.
Topic — Abortion: a moral or immoral choice?
My view: I support abortion as a moral choice.
The essay will develop a brief but sound and modestly comprehensive argument to
defend my above view.
The paper (and especially my arguments in support of abortion) must be taken from at least 3 of the following readings:
Noonan, “An Almost Absolute Value in History”
Don Marquis, “Why Abortion Is Immoral”
Mary Anne Warren, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”
Rosalind Hursthouse, “Virtue Theory and Abortion”
Read the discussion prompt an answer the questions at the ends in paragraph form
Read the discussion prompt an answer the questions at the ends in paragraph form. Write this in 1st person and use a minimum of 8-10 sentences but be sure to answer the questions entirely. Be sure to use in-text and post reference citation from Chapter 11(Stealing): Dimmock, M., & Fisher, A. (2017). Ethics for A-level. Retrieved from https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/ethics-for-a-level ISBN-13: 9781783743902
Discussion Prompt
In November of 1995, a McDonald’s game piece worth $1 million showed up in the mail at St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee. St. Jude’s Hospital is an organization whose mission is to find cures for dying children. McDonald’s generously waived the rules that only the winner could claim the winnings and paid St. Jude’s $50,000 in annual installments. It was the largest anonymous gift in St. Jude’s history. No one ever took credit for the donation. Everyone just thought it just came from deep pockets with a big heart.
Twenty-one individuals were accused of rigging McDonald’s monopoly game, “Who Wants to Be A Millionaire,” and other promotional games. An indictment charged the perpetrators with embezzling more than $20 million in winning game pieces in an alleged fraud that began in the late 1980s. Prosecutors stated that customers had little chance of winning before the FBI, with McDonald’s help, shut it down. Additionally, prosecutors argued that larceny, not charity, inspired the perpetrators to play Santa to St. Jude’s.
Both St. Jude’s and McDonald’s were surprised when CNN broke the story and identified the mystery Santa as the aforementioned team of thieves. Did McDonald’s ask for its money back? No, although St. Jude’s said it would do whatever McDonald’s wanted. In an official statement, a spokesperson for McDonald’s stated that the restaurant chain had no intention of asking for its money back. McDonald’s kept its word and paid out the sum in full, sending the final check to St. Jude’s in 2014.
Discussion questions: Is it morally justifiable to steal from corporations and fund life-saving research for the betterment of society? Using one of the moral theories from this course to bolster support for your view, do your best to attempt to definitely answer whether or not the fraudulent actions of the perpetrators of this act of theft performed a morally right or wrong act.
You’re literally just writing a paper on whatever food you choose, the direction
You’re literally just writing a paper on whatever food you choose, the directions are in the pictures attached. Add sources. You can see my example in one of the photos. I used curry goat as my food, if you can just go off what i had