Category: Ethics

Select an ethical dilemma in the workplace. This can be one that you have analyz

Select an ethical dilemma in the workplace. This can be one that you have analyzed or discussed previously in this course. It can be an example from the text or one that you discover through your research or experience.
Apply a decision-making model
Describe the problem.
Identify the actors and stakeholders.
Map the steps in your decision-making model.
Process the dilemma toward resolution using your model.
Identify your goals and objectives.
Identify how the model impacts the problem.
Where does it make sense?
Where does it fall short?
How sustainable is your resolution?
How can the resolution be strengthened?
Format your assignment as one of the following:
minimum 10-slide presentation
The slides should only contain essential information and as little text as possible. Do not design a slide presentation made up of long bullet points. Your speaker notes convey the details you would give if you were presenting.

Situate yourself as an I/O psychologist working for the company.
Format your mes

Situate yourself as an I/O psychologist working for the company.
Format your message as a memo for the organization’s leadership.
Describe the problem.
Outline the levels of the organization involved.
Explain the ethical dilemma.
Outline the consequences.
Propose 2 to 3 options for challenging the problem.
Present long-term consequences for ignoring the problem.
Provide citations and a reference sheet following APA guidelines.

Instructions
Paper – Find two peer reviewed articles in library about ethics in

Instructions
Paper – Find two peer reviewed articles in library about ethics in your discipline or ethics in research and discuss the positions of the authors.
Assignment Instructions
Instructions: Select two appropriate articles for review to complete the assignment. Write a review using the instructions below. This paper should be a minimum of 1000 words. Write in APA format. Include cover page, body with in text citations & reference list.
Select two Articles
Locate two peer-reviewed article (related to the ethics) published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal from the online library, then present an assessment comprising of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then, evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article for truth.
Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning.
What are both author’s saying the same topic? Do they agree or is there conflicting information.
Draw conclusions.
This assignment has many benefits. First, it requires a search of indexing and abstracting databases from the online library to find an article that meets the specified criteria (must be related to ethics). It also emphasizes what a scholarly article is; to discern between scholarly and non-scholarly writing; to condense someone else’s lengthy argument into a concise report; to think critically about what has been read by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the research; and, thus, to become participants in the discussions regarding the topic at hand.
FYI: Wikipedia is not an acceptable resource for academic writing. Please use the university library for reference. Articles must be peer-reviewed.

Instructions
Prepare a full sentence outline for research paper about customer s

Instructions
Prepare a full sentence outline for research paper about customer service. The outline should include a cover page and list of references. The outline should be a minimum of two double-spaced pages (not counting cover and references).
The purpose of the outline is to help you establish the organization of your final paper.
Follow this structure:
I. Introduction
A. Thesis: Include your thesis statement here.
II. Body – Paragraph 1: Topic
A. Supporting Evidence
1. Explanation
2. Why is this important?
III. Body – Paragraph 2: Topic
IV. Repeat to include a minimum of 3 supporting topics (support your thesis statement).
V. Conclusion
Continue this format to cover all paragraphs in the body of your paper. You must have at least three topics in the body. Do not forget to include the conclusion. End with a list of References. Please see the attached document for a sample full sentence outline. Scroll down in the document to the “full sentence outline” example.

The paper uploaded is almost final (I am still changing some of the content in q

The paper uploaded is almost final (I am still changing some of the content in questions 1 and 2).
I need an abstract of the whole paper (up to 200 words) and an intro (up to 150 words) and a conclusion (100 words) of the paper. Focus primarily on the United Nations for all the sections. There is also a table of contents that needs to be added.
For the intro as its personal: ) to give brief background about your
organisation or community. This should be the organisation you work in
(organisation not just sector) or the community that you are active within.
You must state your role within the organisation / community
The organization I picked for the paper is the United Nations. I have worked there for over 7 years. I have worked in different agencies from development and digital uplift in various countries to trade and commerce to currently working for the Human Rights Council. My role has been project manager and I am now working in the Digitalization department, helping to digitally transform and update processes and internal procedures to help improve the work and the mission of the UN. Its a vast organization that spans the entire world so I tried to stick to as broad of a scope as I could for this paper.
Many thanks.

A scenario critique essay for Bioethics
(Essay Topic needs to be formulated as

A scenario critique essay for Bioethics
(Essay Topic needs to be formulated as well).
Scenario: You are working at a large biosciences research institute, which uses as part of its research rabbit and mice model systems. Your good friend is a member of a moderate animal rights group. Your friend is a decent person whose heart is in the right place. You have known them for years and they have never done anything wrong that you are aware of. Your friend has asked you if you could give them access to the institute’s animal house so they could take a few photos. They assure you they will keep the location secret and only want the photos for a talk they are giving at their next animal rights meeting. Discuss your thoughts on the ethics of how you might respond to this request.
Guide to the task:
– To address your individual grasp of bioethics, a ‘real-world’ ethical scenario will be assigned for you to write a 1,000 word essay. Imagine that you are a practicing bioscientist faced with the scenario; how would you deal with it or what is your analysis of it? Although a more personal approach is possible, the emphasis is still on an academic treatment that involves considering and evaluating the balance of possibilities and justifying your approach. The mere opinion is not sufficient. Supporting your argument with appropriate references is also expected.
– The exercise is intended to be a formative assessment, to help you put your growing ethical understandings to work and as practice on how to formulate an argument systematically.
– Make argumentative points supporting the thesis curated from the scenario.
– Consider the stakeholders and ethical matrix but more in the Bioscience aspect rather than the social and political aspect.

Directions
For this assignment, you will write a paper that explores the values

Directions
For this assignment, you will write a paper that explores the values of the organization and its stakeholders.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Identify at least five stakeholder groups and describe their values.
Describe the stakeholder beliefs and their expectations.
Assess the existing organizational culture and compare it with stated values.
Evaluate the alignment of individual values you have gathered and the organization’s stated values.
Design leadership actions for healthy perceptions.
Be certain to have at least two peer-reviewed sources with proper in-text citations and references. Peer-reviewed articles are written by experts and reviewed by other experts in the same field before they are published. To find peer-reviewed articles in the library, click on Advanced Search and then click on the Peer Reviewed (Scholarly) checkbox.
What to Submit
This submission must be 4–6 pages in length and must use double spacing, 12‐point Times New Roman font, and one‐inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Summarize the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (in one paragraph). Then, discuss why this

Summarize the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (in one paragraph). Then, discuss why this experiment was unethical. Discuss the numerous ethical issues that were raised resulting from this study.
Please ensure you cite your references in APA format with a minimum of 3 academic references. Assignment will be graded based on the following areas: Foundation and synthesis of knowledge, application of knowledge critical thinking, writing skills, and organization of ideas and format.

I have attached the questions and the relevant readings(which maybe useful for a

I have attached the questions and the relevant readings(which maybe useful for answering the questions). Please answer the three questions without the use of any AI tools as those tools are not allowed for this paper. Feel free to contact me for any questions, thank you.

QUESTIONS – In your answers to questions you MUST draw on
a range of academic

QUESTIONS – In your answers to questions you MUST draw on
a range of academic literature and organisational examples to support your
discussion.
2. Critically evaluate the appropriateness of the following statement,
‘management at all levels must not sit tight, with fingers crossed, just hoping
that moral dilemmas will be self-solving’ (Gully et al, 2006).