Category: Ethical Dilemma

Ethical Issues And Dilemmas In Business

A Toxic leadership triangle includes the three aspects of the management which are the leaders who are destructive in their nature, the followers who are vulnerable and the environment which is very much conducive. All these together combine to form the destructive kind of a result. It can, therefore, be said that if the leader practices toxic kind of leadership then their workers tend to become very much unhappy with the organization in which they work this will ultimately lead to the low performance (Mehta and Maheshwari 2014).This will ultimately create a toxic kind of environment where the workers, as well as the leaders, will be toxic and less productive for the organization. Similarly, if a leader who has positivity in his nature will step inside the toxic environment, he or she will turn into a toxic leader in itself. The role of the leader is the most important factor, the leader here is most important for creating a toxic kind of an environment. The creation of a good environment totally depends upon the leader. If the leader has any sort of unethical kind of behavior towards his employees then the employees are also going to present a similar kind of behavior. On the other hand, if the workers see that the leaders are not capable of the work, then they tend to have a certain form of disrespect for the leader. This ultimately leads to the undermining of the leader as well as of the structure of the organization. The toxic leaders are also responsible for the inability of the workers to think critically as well as effectively. The toxic environment which is the second point of the toxic triangle is often the result of the toxic leaders. When toxic attitudes that remained unaddressed creates a toxic kind of an environment.

Consideration and relevance of Kellerman’s approach to defining bad leadership

According to Kellerman, leadership is an art. However, in the present context, only the positive aspects of the leader are being focused on. The negative aspects of the bad leaders are being totally ignored for which the changes are not being modified. Therefore, it is very important to focus on the negative leaders as well as ultimately, in the end, they are the leaders who lead the company and which can bring about both positive and negative effects in the team or the organization (Solas 2016). Another point for which she argues is that possession of certain characteristics makes an individual a bad leader and because of his or her position, he or she is being followed. on the other hand, she continues by saying that the bad leaders are the ones who are very much ineffective in bringing about necessary changes. Apart from this, she also believes that the bad leaders are the ones who are unethical that are they fail to differentiate between the good and the bad (Schyns and Schilling 2013).The leaders who are rigid and fail to make any sort of innovations are considered to be a bad leader by her. The leader who is considered to be liars and cheaters are also considered to be an unethically bad leader. It is under the guidance of such leadership that the organization/company or a team tends to suffer.

The application of Kidder’s four ethical dilemmas

The businessmen belonging to the banking, superannuation and even in the financial service industry often find themselves in the middle of an argument. However, conducting the right decision is always not an easy task for a leader in an organization. Rushworth Kidder who is the founder of the institute of global Ethics identifies four different types of ethical dilemmas which are the short term vs the long term goals, individual vs the community, loyalty vs the truth and lastly the mercy vs the justice (Indradevi 2016). It can be said that the short term, as well as the long term goals, are both beneficial for the organization but changing the short term goal into the long term goal for the enhanced success of the company is very much important. However, there are times where the shorter goals of the company are taken into consideration first because in order to boost the moral support of the organization. The immediate results of the organization can also result in the alterations of the price of the investors towards the company or an organization (Rosenbach 2018). In the workplace, there are people with different cultures and with various differences in the religion as well. In a workplace, there are people belonging to different genders as well. Hence, it is very natural to have different opinions and choices. However, conflicting demands need to be balanced. The employment equality act is meant to create a balance among all the employees (Hadadian and Zarei 2016). There may be a situation where the truth and honesty may be on one hand and loyalty can be on the other hand. In the first phase, it cannot be considered to be an ethical dilemma because honesty is considered by many people as an ethical dilemma. However, it becomes very much difficult when the bond with other people is very much stronger. There may be situations where justice tends to contradict with mercy. In such situations, the labor law acts as a guide to the justice side of the decision. However, the organizations that are related to banking, superannuation and the financial service industry, the leader while making the decisions must not involve the stakeholders as interpreting the situation in a different way can actually take place.

Kidder’s Ethical Checkpoints framework

As per the Kidder’s ethical checkpoint framework, certain steps are to be followed for addressing the ethical dilemmas that are being faced. Firstly, it is very important to understand and even analyze the problem so that the issue can be resolved. In order to analyze the problem, it is very important to uncover the facts and even involve the parties who are being affected. However, it is also very important to identify the diverse perspectives as well as ask the most difficult questions related to the problem concerned in order to analyze the problem, the second step is to examine various ethical standards that are applicable. The examination must be conducted between the right versus right values in order to uncover the values which are being shared. In such a situation it is very important to work on the imaginative as well as on the creative solutions that tend to implement various ethical standards. The third step is to examine the moral motivations concerning potential decisions. In such a situation it is important to identify and even work through the interest which is contradicting. The fourth step is to make and even implement a decision it is very important to inspire the implementation of a decision that tends to have a positive impact on the parties which are affected. The last step that must be followed is that the leader must reflect on the result of the decision. In such a situation, it is very much important to understand the effect that the outcome has on the others. It is also very much important to learn from the mistakes in order to make modifications and gain success in the upcoming future. Kidder’s ethical checkpoint framework must be followed in order to address to the various ethical issues.

Issues of trust in leadership

A leader is the main head of the organization who takes the organization into the path of success or to its destruction. The leader helps the company to achieve the goals of the company in the long run. However, it is very important for the employees in the organization to trust its leaders as well. However, if the leader tends to lack courage and does not stand for what is right then it becomes very much difficult for the employees to have thrust upon him (Ciulla, 2017) The employees tend to think the leaders as deceitful and forged when they are too much involved in the matter of politics (Rosenbach 2018) On the other hand, if the leader is just interested in himself and not in the growth and progress of the others then the employees tend to lack trust upon the others. Additionally, if there are negative rumors about the leader, the employees tend to have less amount of trust in the employees. The lack of trust of the employees on the leader can create a toxic kind of environment and even a low performance from the employees (Mineo 2014). On the other hand, if the employees tend to have trust up in the leader, it will be motivating the employees to the right path of success. Even if the organization is going through some difficulty, the trust of the employees on the leaders will help the employees in the organization or the company to get highly motivated and influenced (Kenney 2017).

References

1. Ciulla, J.B., 2017. Trust and the future of leadership. The Blackwell guide to business ethics, pp.334-351.
2. Hadadian, Z. and Zarei, J., 2016. Relationship between toxic leadership and job stress of knowledge workers. Studies in Business and Economics, 11(3), pp.84-89.
3. Indradevi, R., 2016. Toxic leadership over the years–a review. Purushartha: A Journal of Management Ethics and Spirituality, 9(1).
4. Kenney, T.R., 2017. TEACHING ETHICS IN A LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. ASBBS Proceedings, 24(1), p.362.
5. Mehta, S. and Maheshwari, G.C., 2014. Toxic leadership: Tracing the destructive trail. International Journal of Management, 5(10), pp.18-24.
6. Mineo, D.L., 2014. The Importance of Trust in Leadership. Research Management Review, 20(1), p.n1.
7. Rosenbach, W.E., 2018. Contemporary issues in leadership. Routledge.
8. Scheirton, Linda. ‘Leadership and Applied Ethics (ILD 802).’ (2013).
9. Schyns, B. and Schilling, J., 2013. How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), pp.138-158.
10. Solas, J., 2016. The banality of bad leadership and followership. Society and Business Review.

Ethical Dilemmas At Kentucky Fried Chicken

Introduction

Colonel Harlan Sanders is the organizer of Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC). He was born on September 9, 1890. When his mother needs to go to work, he needs to do a lot of home cooking. After his father kicked the ball, he dealt with three relatives. Since then, he has figured out how to cook and increase the value of various neighborhood foods at the age of seven.

In the 1930s, Colonel Sanders, who was only 40 years old, bought a gas station, a hotel and a tavern in Corbin, Kentucky. After the work went on, he got them. He tried different flavors to prepare his chicken. Many explorers like the taste of his chicken, which makes his chicken widely known.

In the following nine years, Colonel Sanders established his mysterious recipe, which included 11 spices and flavors and basic cooking strategies, which are still in use today. It turns out that he is more well-known. He sold his chicken on the highway, but then the road was destroyed and later sold. Since then, he has traveled to the United States by car to cook chicken for restaurant owners and their workers. When the chance of them liking the chicken was small, he could get nickel from every chicken sold in the cafe.

By 1964, Colonel Harland Sanders (Col. Harland Sanders, Colorado) had 600 chicken farms across the United States and Canada. Soon thereafter, he sold his passion for American business for $2 million. He died at the age of 90 on December 16, 1980. He is committed to building the whole field, and his legacy is spread all over the world in KFC restaurants, serving the Colonel’s unique plan. This is a $13 billion brand from Kentucky. (Amodia, 2015)

Findings of the Reports

Ethics is a set of principles with a theoretical or moral value system. The purpose of research ethics is to study the universality of morality in order to control one’s behavior. What is the dilemma? Dilemmas are situations where difficult choices are made between alternatives. What is an ethical dilemma? This is also called a moral dilemma. Ethical dilemmas are common in the work environment. Moral dilemma refers to the difficulty that people encounter when choosing between ethical behavior and unethical behavior. An organization may face many ethical dilemmas, and KFC is one of the organizations facing major dilemmas. KFC was established by Colonel Sanders in 1952 and is one of the most popular fast food restaurants in the world. KFC currently provides operations, franchising and services for approximately 11,000 fast food restaurants worldwide.

A few years ago, nearly 8 million customers used KFC every day. However, due to the increasing awareness of health in today’s society, the number of KFC sales has recently fallen sharply. Nowadays, people pay more attention to their health and figure than before. Reports and studies have shown that fast food has no nutrition and is the biggest fact that causes obesity.

The Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) company has ethical issues. KFC’s moral issues have aroused social attention. The media released news about KFC problems. KFC Malaysia must take appropriate ethical actions to correct the problem in order to restore customer loyalty to the KFC brand awareness. (pravinatormeister, 2015)

Chicken Abuse, and PETA

KFC needs to give 700 million chickens to eateries around the globe consistently. KFC guaranteed that they ‘just arrangement with providers who guarantee to keep up our exclusive requirements and are focused on creature government assistance.’ But with respect to the treatment of the bought chickens (verification of realistic proof), a scientist who treats creatures morally (PETA) took a video demonstrating that the chicken was purposely manhandled by laborers. The video was taken at a slaughterhouse at Pilgrim’s Pride in Moorefield, West Virginia. Laborers there kicked live chickens like football and crushed them on the divider. Clearly these laborers were only for diversion. This time it won’t occur. PETA’s examination of KFC shows that KFC has an excessive number of providers. In the United States alone, numerous providers are included, and Tyson Slaughterhouse is one of them. It was appeared in the slaughterhouse that the flying creature was purposefully singed to death, crushed by impermanent fireworks, and broken by laborers so it could be put in the snare and circle of the butcher line. Tyson is the biggest provider of KFC.

In different nations, the most famous issue with respect to KFC provider misuse is in India. Individuals found that the chickens were pressed brimming with cadavers, brutal taking care of techniques, debilitated and harmed chicken stockrooms, however never got any clinical help, and they were tormented by barbarous specialists, they didn’t consider creature government assistance Minimum principles. Savagery to creatures can be characterized as KFC’s most genuine good difficulty.

In India, on August 20, 2003, a five-foot-tall chicken was bbleed with quills and snouts on a couple of strolling sticks outside the Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC). The chicken was conveniently restricted in the Indian branch in Bangalore. This chicken was brought by PETA activists who conveyed playing a card game, ‘Stopped India’ and ‘Stop Play Fowl’. The chicken was put in the middle and calmly challenged the supposed winged animal maltreatment in the KFC poultry ranch. Media faculty were approached to cover the walk widely. Because of the far and wide fights, Canada’s PETA new creature government assistance program has been actualized in the manufacturing plants of KFC providers. As per the new arrangement, 100% of chicken meat will be bought from providers that utilization Atmospheric Controlled Killing (CAK).

PETA’s dissent is against the savagery and maltreatment of KFC chickens. They have no goal of updating KFC’s general assembling measure. Rather, PETA asked KFC to receive a creature government assistance plan created by its five individuals (KFC) Animal Welfare Committee and embrace Controlled Killing Atmosphere Killing Here (CAK). As per PETA, the poultry ranches where travelers are pleased don’t consent to any animal government assistance principles. Like the featured Belo, these chickens were hit hard on the poultry ranch before being butchered.

KFC is generally a greasy food made with abundance oil and added substances, (for example, salt and sugar), which implies there are a great deal of calories. On the off chance that clients devour a lot of cheap food, they may get hefty and experience the ill effects of diabetes, hypertension, stroke, and heart-related manifestations because of unreasonable fat prompting raised cholesterol. Clients may likewise expend an excess of inexpensive food since it is less expensive to purchase in enormous amounts. Moreover, considers have been finished to demonstrate that individuals living close to drive-through joints are bound to be fat.

Murder the chickens before they are a month and a half old. In the slaughterhouse, the chickens are hanging upside down and moved to the slaughterhouse by means of a transport line. Such a large number of chickens were unloaded from the cases onto the quick moving transport line, making the chickens at the base choke. Unfit to deal with countless chickens, the laborers discarded a few chickens and hammered them on the divider or floor. So as to eliminate quills during preparing, live chickens are tossed into high temp water.(pravinatormeister, 2015)

Human Resources Policies

Above photograph is the episode that occurs in KFC I-City, Malaysia. This episode was occurring on sixth February 2012. The occurrence happens is on the grounds that the client has been sitting tight for over 1 hour yet when goes to his turn, there is NO MORE seared chicken for the clients. The client demands the administration to apologize however the Store Manager fail to help that issue. The issues happen when the specialist yelled: ‘kalau mau makan, buat sendiri lah BABI… ‘ is means that ‘do it with your own on the off chance that you need to eat, pig.’ The KFC I-City labourers assault clients by utilizing awful portrayals words to the clients cause this battle occur. Workers must dodge to do assault activity to the clients. As a drive-through joint which sells administration, KFC labourers need to comprehend clients’ correct.

The Humane Society of the United States characterizes creature maltreatment as a scope of unfeeling conduct to the creatures which incorporates unexpected disregard and deliberate disregard to pernicious killings. In light of the creature savagery issues, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the creature right gathering have been fighting KFC’s treatment of the creatures utilized for its items with the Kentucky Fried Cruelty crusade. PETA states that they have held in excess of 12,000 showings at KFC outlets since 2003 in view of supposed abuse of chickens by KFC providers.

KFC HR office should direct their arrangements. Absence of control of rules and guidelines and order cause KFC moral exercises has been raised to news by confronting allegation from the general public. HR is the authoritative capacity that manages issues identified with individuals, for example, pay, recruiting, execution the board, association improvement, security, health, benefits, representative inspiration, correspondence, organization, and preparing.

HR is additionally a key and far reaching way to deal with overseeing individuals and the work environment culture and climate. Viable HR empowers workers to contribute successfully and beneficially to the general organization bearing and the achievement of the association’s objectives and goals.

HR significant arrangement is client right starts things out. In light of the cases occur in I-CITY Shah Alam, the KFC notice that once the examination is finished, KFC will make all fitting move to address any infringement of KFC severe working techniques and client support norms. (ukessays, 2017)

Job Satisfaction, as Working Condition

Crafted by the Manuel G. Velasques (1996) accentuation that the discerning pieces of the association put in a high incentive on effectiveness: All positions and assignments are to be planned to accomplish the association’s objectives as proficiently as could reasonably be expected. At the point when effectiveness is accomplished through specialization, the level-headed parts of associations will in general fuse exceptionally specific positions. As we known, who are working in a drive-through joint is certainly held on for continue rehashing similar positions ordinarily with no exemption. This prompts work disappointment to the labourers, it will change their perspectives when they feel irritated in doing their works, this is additionally why a few clients grumbling on they got impolite administrations in the chain. Effectiveness is accomplished by understanding the labourers inspirational examples. Educator Abrahim Maslow referred to in his examination the 5 need factors, for instance security, social and regard. These variables are moral and upgrades profitability at KFC both neighbourhood and globally.

At the point when representatives glad, they will work joyfully and afterward treat their client better, the brilliant standard is to perceive the distinctions is societies and financial advancement of the nations. To more readily esteem KFC, the reasonable exchange idea is to be used further to firms, network association, focusing on ought to be the code of practices in KFC. (pravinatormeister, 2015)

Conclusion

To put it plainly, it tends to be said that business morals is significant for business associations. It can help associations effectively win the regard of clients and win far reaching acclaim. In opposition to individuals’ conviction that social obligation subverts the organization’s benefit objectives, it really produces benefits through client unwaveringness and a decent organization picture. For KFC, KFC must have the option to guarantee that the items it gives are sound and nutritious to guarantee that KFC picks up the trust, steadfastness and regard of clients, and that the organization’s picture is secured and created.

The fundamental motivation behind this report is to direct a moral examination of KFC. The report investigated the principle moral difficulties looked by KFC, particularly the perspectives on shoppers, providers, workers and society all in all. Despite the fact that KFC is the most famous chicken café network on the planet, it presently faces numerous ethical predicaments. For instance, the problem between shoppers’ interest for sound food and the truth of giving unhealthy food, just as the predicament looked by the connection among KFC and its providers, and among KFC and its workers.

So as to take care of these issues, KFC endeavors to alter as indicated by purchasers’ inclinations, and takes fitting measures to build up a success win connection between the organization, providers and workers. The report accepts that KFC’s best morals is its endeavors to satisfy its social obligations. KFC effectively settled the KFC Lei Education Foundation to offer monetary help for instruction, and set up the Food and Health Foundation to finance logical exploration, exposure and training ventures identified with nourishment and wellbeing. Considering KFC’s generally dishonest exhibition in publicizing, this report contains a few proposals.

Recommendations

In this part, the report will make proposals on moral issues in publicizing, on the grounds that KFC referenced in the above depiction neglects to give moral execution in such manner. Lately, KFC’s beguiling promoting has been scrutinized. It is clearly deceptive to maintain a business that for the most part gives fatty consuming food and cases that its items have unpretentious advantages. When planning and showing ads, it is suggested that KFC treat purchasers mindfully and give precise and exhaustive depictions of its items. Misleading statements, ambiguities, distortions, duplicities, and so forth ought to be totally kept away from in promotions. It is acceptable to educate purchasers regarding dietary and calorie data. Preferably, KFC ought to endeavor to sell its items using non-manipulative and influential advancements, and educate purchasers in a far reaching and honest way

KFC should meet everything lawful business prerequisites to improve its feasibility. The Ministry of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs suggests a greatest stocking thickness of 30 chickens of around 34 kg for each square meter, and said that when the noses should be managed to forestall shared mischief between them, only 33% of the poultry ought to be supplied. feathered creatures. The mouth ought to be managed from the tip to the passage of the nostril.

At last, I figure the HR office must take all obligations. The HR division ought to furnish representatives with worker preparing plans to normalize their conduct and work mentality. KFC ought to likewise normalize provider sets of principles. All workers and providers who follow KFC guidelines ought to be rebuffed.

Whistleblower: An Ethical Dilemma

Dr. Jeffrey Wigand made a moral and ethical decision to expose safety concerns with Brown and Williamson tobacco industry, where he was a director of research (Feldman, 2016). He did provide information and proof that his company was adding more additives to make their product more addictive and he exposed them for it (Feldman, 2016). How Dr. Jeffry Wigand showed moral intelligence is by taking a stand for what’s wrong and right, he risked his carrier and his life due to death threats for the customers. He seen that adding additional nicotine to increase the customer’s addiction is morally and ethically wrong, and he made sure he took a stand for what he believes is correct. How he was a leader in this situation is he never backed down and continued to make sure they were exposed, and something was done about it. He did not let the death threats deter his feeling of what was right. I think for his own credibility was feeling good about standing up for what is right and making a difference in those individual’s lives that were purchasing and using their products (Feldman, 2016).

If I found something that was unethical in my workplace, I would first go to my supervisor to see if they see this as unethical. If the supervisor does not see there is any problems or that the situation is unethical of course I would then go up the ladder until we get to senior leadership. Once situation was brought to leadership and they respond back with no unethical standpoint and they are not going to do anything about it, I would most definitely move in the same direction as Dr. Jeffrey Wigand and make sure to expose the company. This would not be to hurt them but to get them to turn things around and do right by the people or customers they serve. I currently work for a reproductive healthcare provider and would not want to do anything unethical or wrong to our patients. My decision would not be based on the severity of the unethical practice, because I see unethical is unethical, regardless of big or small. Like I have always said wrong is wrong, and you cannot cover up wrong for a long time, it will soon show itself in many ways.

The reason that some people tend to accept unethical practices and others do not, because most people are scared to stand up for what’s right. People are scared about how others will look at them and perceive them as causing problems in the workplace and people make comments if they do not agree. Some fear change and how that will impact them. They do not want to speak up because they are scared to lose their job, because they are supporting a family and themselves. So, because of that they do not say anything, and they go with the flow.

Overall, everyone should feel they can stand up for what they feel is right without any kind of repercussion. That everyone should accept and be respectful of everyone’s opinions, thoughts, ideas and if something is truly unethical then to reach out for assistance. I see Dr. Jeffrey Wigand as a great influence for everyone to stand up for what they feel is right and ethical. When you stand up for what is right it will make you feel good about yourself like it did Dr. Jeffrey Wigand.

References

1. Feldman, C. (2016, 02 04). 60 Minutes’ Most Famous Whistleblower. Retrieved from CBS News: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-most-famous-whistleblower/

Is It Ethical to Target Uninformed Consumers: Essay

It is unethical to target uninformed consumers because these consumers waste money on name brands and these brands often mislead, exploit, or spam consumers to trick them into buying their products.

Let’s start with how uninformed consumers waste money on name brands. A new study writes Harvard behavioral economics professor Cass Sunstein, shows that “the more informed you are, the more likely you are to choose store brands. If all consumers were better-informed, then, consumer markets would look very different,’ says Sunstein, who co-wrote a 2008 book arguing that poor choices are often the product of unaddressed biases. The report found that by sticking to generic products instead of national brands, consumers could save as much as $44b. Another example is if a taxi driver in an unfamiliar city knows that someone else is covering your fare, they are much more likely to charge you a higher price than is justified by the distance you are taking. That is one of the lessons from an economic experiment involving 400 undercover taxi rides in Athens, Greece. This manipulation had an economically pronounced and statistically significant positive effect on taxi bills, with undercover passengers in that treatment 17% more likely to pay higher-than-justified prices for a given ride. Total consumer expenditures increased by an average of 6% when consumers indicated that someone else would be paying the bill. In addition, female customers were on average more susceptible to fraud and paying higher prices than men. This proves that consumers are basically robbed of their money by companies that are trying to sell their products or make more money.

Brands often mislead, exploit, or spam consumers to trick them into buying their products. For example, Ads for Dannon’s popular Activia brand yogurt landed the company with a class action settlement of $45 million in 2010, according to ABC News. The yogurt was marketed as being “clinically” and “scientifically proven” to boost your immune system and able to help regulate digestion. As a result, the yogurt was sold at 30% higher prices than other similar products. This shows that many companies have misled their customers just to make more money. Also, it is also shown that these customers are often uninformed about the products they buy. Many can say that you eliminate the waste and cost of marketing to consumers unlikely to use your services. But the truth is that the only people that benefit from targeting uninformed consumers are the people selling the product to consumers. The companies are in it for themselves and want to make money. A study by the University of Massachusetts found that 60 percent of people lied at least once during a 10-minute conversation. According to Forbes, Christopher Elliot claims that “misleading a customer about a price, hiding ‘gotcha’ clauses in the fine print, making claims about the products that aren’t true may not even be crimes. At least, that’s the impression we’re left with, in a world where the government cares more about freeing businesses from ‘burdensome’ regulation than protecting consumers.”

In conclusion, it is unethical the target uninformed consumers because not only does it mislead them but it also makes them spend much more money than they need to. Of course, it benefits the companies that sell the product but does it really help the consumers?

Is It Ethical to Target Uninformed Consumers: Essay

Many grocery stores around the world have been useful to provide a variety of foods and other services as well. From the 15th century starting mass production of natural grocery varieties to modern society such as Walmart and other grocery stores enriching the needs of others was a great business tool and idea that has built upon people’s needs for food and drinks. There have been many successes being made in grocery stores providing the needs of others, but has also gone overbroad in labeling and acquit the services of targeting uninformed consumers buying a product. Targeting uninformed consumers, especially those who do not perceive education and are unclear about the elements contained in a product is an unethical way of marketing and should regulate laws based on this unbehavioral business.

Providing a product to any uninformed consumer is a violation and considered to be an ‘unethical business practice’ because there have been data as health investigations showing that certain grocery stores that contained unlabeled foods and not providing GMO notifications are more likely to have health issues than a grocery store providing labeled and services towards informed costumers. According to the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), they show that 20% of the grocery stores in the United States have labeling issues or nonlabeled products, and surveys showing that people who go to these grocery stores are experiencing health problems regarding this issue. People in Indonesia suffered from various diseases such as Malaria, Skin viruses, and other organ viruses as well. The ingredients that were unlabeled were harming others according to the Indonesia National Food Department which recorded and coordinated with the Federal Disease Control (FDC). The amount of people that have to face the fatalities that uninformed consumers faced is unacceptable and needs to be fixed immediately to stop the crisis that not only the United States faces today but also the 3rd world countries around the world. Also, religion does play a role in this sector because Gluten is a part that isn’t labeled in most products. Many religions such as some Hindus, Sikhism, Jainism, and Judaism follow the norm that they are not allowed to eat any meat products. Gluten comes from pig grease which impacts the people who follow these religions and is considered extremely unethical to provide individuals with this kind of service.

Other businesses would agree that providing uninformed consumers with no services on the labeling of the product has a more immense opportunity of making a more efficient profit in their opinion. Businesses would make a better profit which an agreeable, but this is again an unacceptable practice in the business world and more people are suffering due to this. Since religion plays a role in these small eyes of unethical practices, uninformed consumers need to be informed in order to prevent major political and economical issues.