Hi Y, Below is my assessment of your essay based on the CP Rubric. It is clear t

Hi Y, Below is my assessment of your essay based on the CP Rubric. It is clear t

Hi Y, Below is my assessment of your essay based on the CP Rubric. It is clear that your paper is about the negative environmental effects of the war in Gaza, but there are some major issues with source integration and citation. You do not quote from your sources directly, which creates confusion about which ideas are your own and which are the ideas of your sources. Some of your internal citations do not match up with the sources listed in your Works Cited page. In order to receive a passing grade on the paper, you must revise & resubmit, ensuring that 1) you quote directly from sources, 2) integrate those quotations into your own writing and 3) correctly format internal citations and works cited entries according to MLA formatting. I will give you three days to revise the paper. Attached is the pdf with my comments — you will have to open it in Adobe. Best, Claire
Exposition of a problem: Good/Very Good
Body of research: Non-passing
Organization: Very Good
Evidence: Non-passing
Language: Very Good
MLA formatting: Non-passing i just need you to correct these errors and you don’t need to rewrite the whole paper you will need to open this document in adobe maybe to see the comments

Answer the questions below for your journal entry. The response should be in es

Answer the questions below for your journal entry. The response should be in es

Answer the questions below for your journal entry. The response should be in essay format and should be about 300 words in length.
Many authors and artists are already in the process of suing companies like Open AI, which made ChatGPT, for copyright infringement. They claim that the company is using their creative work, without permission, to train the AI and make money.
Do you think artists and writers should be able to prevent companies like Open AI from using their work? If so, what do you think would happen in the future of AI? After all, AI programs like ChatGPT depend on massive amounts of data scraped from the internet. If every piece of that data had to be paid for, then something like ChatGPT would be impossible to create.

Before starting your essay, you should do the following: 1) Read about the histo

Before starting your essay, you should do the following: 1) Read about the histo

Before starting your essay, you should do the following: 1) Read about the history of abolitionism in America in Module 6. 2) Watch the documentaries on Frederick Douglass and David Walker in Module 6. 3) Read the two primary sources in Module 6 by David Walker and Frederick Douglass. 4). Write an essay based on the following prompt:
What do you think are the most important arguments or language styles that make Walker and Douglass’s documents such important and effective examples of Black abolitionist literature? Who was each man’s intended audience and how did they influence their arguments or language? Your essay should analyze in-depth at least one example for each person.
Primary Source Documents
David Walker, Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World (1829)Download David Walker, Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World (1829)
Frederick Douglass, “The Meaning of the 4th of July for the Negro” (1852)Links to an external site.
Your essay should be at least three pages in length. Please use 12-point font and double-spacing. Your essay must use MLA style in-text citations. If you are not familiar with how to do MLA style in-text citations, click hereLinks to an external site..
Organizing Your Essay
Here is a general guide for organizing your essay:
Introduction: Introduce the topic your essay will address. Next, establish your essay’s main argument or thesis statement.
First Main Paragraph – Historical Context : Explain the historical context in which your primary sources originated.
Second Main Paragraph: Support your thesis by analyzing your primary sources and providing specific supporting evidence.
Third Main Paragraph: Support your thesis by analyzing your primary sources and providing specific supporting evidence. You can develop more supporting paragraphs as needed if you start new sub-topics.
Conclusion: Tie together the points you made in your essay and reiterate your thesis.

Introduction In our capitalist society, we are bombarded with advertising and op

Introduction
In our capitalist society, we are bombarded with advertising and op

Introduction
In our capitalist society, we are bombarded with advertising and opportunities to purchase products, goods, and services seemingly non-stop with limitless choices, but being a consumer and being a responsible consumer are two different things. Consider the implications of the choices that we make as consumers in a free market economy; by buying a product, we are, in a very real sense, approving of the business decisions made by that company, unknowingly or unwillingly supporting very unethical or damaging business practices. However, although corporate power may seem insurmountable, informed and educated consumers can knowingly and deliberately make decisions that support ethical, humane, and sustainable practices by exercising the power of the consumer. This assignment asks you to explore the implications of our specific decisions as consumers by researching one product, company, service, or corporation, and recommending to your readers whether or not you think we should support it.
Topic
In an essay intended for an audience made up primarily of people who live in your region of the country, examine the effects of a decision to support a particular corporation, buy a specific item (or shop at a particular store) that is commonly available to local consumers. For example, in the film Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, Robert Greenwald explores the impact of purchases at Wal-Mart. The Corporation identifies the devastating effects that corporations have on the world. In your essay, you might consider other common items: entertainment equipment such as televisions, certain kinds of clothing, gasoline, services such as wireless telephone service, or transportation such as airlines or a particular brand of automobile or type of food. You should, however, choose a specific business or company, like Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, General Motors, Monsanto, Bayer, Pfizer, or Chiquita in order to focus on a specific example. The subject of your investigation is up to you, but please try to be original and avoid the topics that are relatively familiar (or the examples from class), such as Wal-Mart, McDonald’s, Nestle, Nike, cigarettes, and Starbucks.
Once you have selected the corporation that you want to focus on, closely examine the reasons that you–or any consumer–might choose to buy that item. Look at the specific choices available for that item–for example, the different kinds of cars that you could choose from if you were going to buy a car. Look at the advertisements and websites for the product or service as well. Additionally, research the possible effects that purchasing that item might have on the local economy, the global economy, politics, the environment, your health, the well-being of your neighbors and community, the workforce, and any other relevant effects. Where does our money go? Do they contribute to or support any sort of legislation that we should be aware of? Consider interviewing people who have made such a purchase and review articles you locate on the effects of your chosen purchase.
After you have explored these issues, write an essay (5 or more pages, double-spaced, in 12 point professional font such as Times New Roman) in which you make an argument about whether or not, as responsible consumers, we should spend our money on a particular product, company, or service.
Key Features:
1. An introduction that gets the reader’s attention and states your thesis. Provide an overview of your entire essay. here. Whether or not you decide to use an “essay map” in a thesis that lists your subtopics, be sure to include a claim, or unifying element, that explains your overall argument. Unless you have a good reason to place it somewhere else, this should be the last sentence of your introduction and should state specifically what your recommendations to local consumers regarding your product, service, or company are.
2. A definition of key terms: carefully explain the necessity or importance of the product that you are writing about to give your readers a clear idea of your topic (but be careful not to let this section take over your essay–limit it to one paragraph). If you are writing about a product such as oil, provide background information that explains the need for oil in the U.S., or the available alternatives to importing foreign oil.
3. Appropriate organization and paragraphing, including use of clear topic sentences that introduce your subpoints and connect them clearly to your thesis. The paragraphs should be in a logical order and use transitions to show links between ideas.
4. At least three (3) library sources, such as articles from EBSCO or Proquest.
5. At least three (3) reliable online sources; try searching using www.ipl.org.
6. Explanations that are supported with specific evidence (your evidence may come from your personal experience, field research, class readings, and library and Internet research).
7. The use of clear, well-reasoned, logical arguments as discussed in How to Write Anything.
8. A conclusion that provides closure to the essay and considers the implications of the argument.
9. MLA Style (heading, margins, title, line spacing, page numbering, parenthetical note(s), and Works Cited page.
10.Observance of the conventions of standard written English.
Outline:
Here is a sample outline:
I. Introduction
Introduce product and company; briefly mention your subtopics; provide necessary background information; define any important terms (if necessary, these can be separate paragraphs); state thesis.
II. Explain how company or product is perceived by consumers
Use researched articles, interviews, personal experience, and/or testimonials (from consumer websites or blogs, for example) to support your points.
III. Describe how the company represents itself in its promotional materials (ads, website, etc.)
Use an analysis of ads, the website, and/or other print materials.
IV. Present your research on the business practices of the company (multiple paragraphs)
Using cause / effect reasoning–and avoiding faulty cause fallacies—describe the impact or repercussions of buying a particular product (i.e. the investment in a product supports sweatshops, creates profits for a company with unethical business practices, leads to environmental damage, etc.; or, ethically, the company simply misrepresents itself through its advertising or other promotional materials. Use researched articles, interviews, personal experience, and/or testimonials (from consumer websites or blogs, for example) to support your points. Remember to use the Toulmin logic model to clearly explain how the evidence you present supports the points you are using it to support.
V. Present your reasons to buy or not to buy the product
Use an appropriate method of reasoning (inductive, deductive, Rogerian, traditional) to explain to your readers why you feel a product is worth buying or not due to the company’s business practices. Support your argument with concrete evidence (quotes, observations, personal experience, reasons).
VI. Address and refute opposing arguments and/or objections to your argument
Objectively explain the opposing point of view (to your own), and then explain why you choose not to support that position (i.e. it’s illogical, untrue, not the best solution to the problem, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages).
VII. Conclusion
Offer alternatives for consumers to the product that you have reviewed negatively; suggest what your readers might do (like boycott a particular brand of clothing) in order to avoid supporting environmentally dangerous products; or make recommendations to the company on behalf of your readers.

Our course was 2024 SU [5W1] Eng Comp II:Writ and Rhetoric ENG 112 202 [5834] [L

Our course was 2024 SU [5W1] Eng Comp II:Writ and Rhetoric ENG 112 202 [5834] [L

Our course was 2024 SU [5W1] Eng Comp II:Writ and Rhetoric ENG 112 202 [5834] [Lecture] [Bronx CC]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvTOwB8x7kE
Discussion 10: Final Thoughts on the Course
Previous Next
TopicThreads
Posts
Last Post
Discussion 10: Final Thoughts on the Course
Contains unread posts
Starts Jul 29
As Discussion Boards are great for reflection, let’s do some reflecting. You’ve made it to the end of the course. Congratulations! What did you think of the course? Do you enjoy fully online courses? Do you think you will take more in the future? Was the course useful for developing your critical thinking and writing skills, or was it just another obstacle on the way to your ultimate goal. Is there any chance you will enroll for even more English classes?
(We have great electives ranging from Shakespeare to The Modern American Short Story, and everything in between. The electives I teach most often are ENG 135 Popular Culture & Literature, ENG 140 Folklore, and ENG 156 Children’s Literature. All of these courses count towards your Writing Intensive requirement, and many of them cover other requirements as well.)
So let’s kick back our boots and reflect. What did you like most? What did you like least? What will you carry with you into the future?
***Posting Guidelines***
Length: You will be graded on the quality and depth of your posts. Initial posts must be a minimum of 250 words. Response posts must be a minimum of 50 words each.
Engagement: The more you engage, the better you will do. I encourage you to engage deeply with the time period, the primary source under consideration, and your fellow classmates’ thoughts and ideas.
Plagiarism: Posts must be entirely in your own words. Engaging in any form of plagiarism, including copying and pasting from Internet sources, reusing other students’ posts, and using artificial intelligence are strictly prohibited. All posts must exhibit a 0% similarity score on www.zerogpt.com. Academic dishonesty will not be tolerated and will receive an automatic zero.

English 103–Essay #3: Peer Review Worksheet Reviewer’s Name: Essay Writer’s Nam

English 103–Essay #3: Peer Review Worksheet
Reviewer’s Name:
Essay Writer’s Nam

English 103–Essay #3: Peer Review Worksheet
Reviewer’s Name:
Essay Writer’s Name:
Write your answers below (or on a separate sheet of paper) to each of the questions.
1. First, begin by reading the essay through non-stop. What is the purpose of the essay? Write a few sentences about your overall impression. Summarize the main idea of the essay as you understand it.
Who do you think is the audience for this paper?
Next read the essay to yourself slowly and write your responses to the following questions, or make notes and marks on the essay as necessary. Avoid useless Yes or No answers; offer complete responses and suggestions you feel would help to improve your peer’s draft.
2. Find the thesis sentence in the paper and underline it. What insight about the corporation does the thesis make? What do you enjoy most about the writer’s approach to the subject?
Introduction and background information:
3. Does the author mention the corporation and provide adequate background information in the introduction? Is there a creative “hook” that grabs the reader’s attention?
4. Is there a brief overview of the essay in the introduction—some indication as to how the author will develop his or her ideas? What needs to be added, if anything?
5. Are there any terms used in the essay that require explanation or special definition? List them. Important terms should be defined in the introduction or early in the essay.
Body Paragraphs:
6. Examine one paragraph. Choose one body paragraph to examine in detail. The purpose of the body paragraphs is to take one aspect of the thesis statement, explain it in detail, and support it with researched quotes, explaining how the quote proves the author’s point. The goal of this essay is to convince readers whether or not to support a corporation based on its business practices.
A. Topic Sentence: Find the topic sentence of the paragraph, and underline it. The topic sentence in the paragraph should express the paragraph’s main point, which supports the paper’s thesis. Is the point of that sentence sufficiently clear? If not, how could it be improved?
B. Transitions: Identify words or phrases at the beginning and / or end of the paragraph that serve to make a logical transition both to that paragraph and to the next paragraph. Do those transitions work for you? Could they be improved? How?
C. Quotes: Look at the evidence provided in the paragraph (usually a quote or two, but at least a specific reference to the source). Does it clearly support the conclusion(s) drawn from it? Is more evidence needed?
7. Look briefly at the paragraphs or sections on (1) the consumer’s perception of the corporation; (2)the corporation’s website / self-representation and/or advertising; and (3) the sections where the corporation’s business practices are discussed. Note any places where more detail, clarity, support, or development is needed.
Suggestions for Reorganization or Development:
8. Focus now on the entire essay. What still needs to be discussed by the writer? Discuss any ideas you might have to help the writer complete effective argument about whether or not we should continue to support the corporation.
9. Underline and / or make margin notes to address each of the following questions.
∙ Point out passages that provide a clear, easy-to-follow analysis.
∙ Point out places where the writer showed some enlightening insight into the subject
∙ Point out places where you would like greater specificity or more detail.
∙ Point out general or flat statements. Indicate places where the writer might be more successful in illustrating the thesis through use of summary, paraphrase, or quotation.
10. Look at the ending. Is it satisfying? Does it repeat what you already know? Does it oversimplify or reduce the author’s thesisto something less important than you expected? Does the ending frame the essay by referring back to the beginning or explain the overall significance or importance of the subject? Were you convinced by the author’s argument? Was it insightful?
11. Documentation & Quoting: Is the documentation, as far as it is used in the draft, correct? Does the author use quotes effectively? Does s/he integrate them well, or are they simply inserted? Does the author use too many quotes? Too few? Are there appropriate uses of paraphrase and summary as well?

TRANSNATIONAL CAPITAL AUCTION: A GAME OF SURVIVAL One of the more difficult asp

TRANSNATIONAL CAPITAL AUCTION: A GAME OF SURVIVAL
One of the more difficult asp

TRANSNATIONAL CAPITAL AUCTION: A GAME OF SURVIVAL
One of the more difficult aspects to understand in this research project is about the effect of corporations on the global economy. That might, in fact, be one of the most important factors to consider in research, but it’s one of the factors that is the least visible. So, let’s try this simulation exercise–“The Transnational Capital Auction”–to see what the effects of globalization might be on a developing country and its workers.
Let’s play a game…..
YOUR ROLE:
You are the leader of a poor country. Each of your countries was either colonized by European countries or dominated by them economically & militarily. You need to attract foreign investment (capital) from transnational corporations for many different reasons. Of course, not all of your people are poor. Many, including a number of you, are quite wealthy. But your wealth depends largely on making deals with corporations that come back to your country. You get various kickbacks, bribes, jobs for members of your families, etc. Some of this is legal, some not. But in order to stay in power you also need to provide jobs for your people, & the owners of capital companies like Nike, Disney, Coca-Cola, Levi Strauss, etc. are the ones who provide thousands of jobs in their factories. The more jobs you can bring into your country, the more legitimacy you have in the eyes of your people. And, your government collects taxes from these companies, which help keep your government working, & also help you pay back your loans to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) & other foreign-owned banks. The bottom line is this: You badly need these companies to invest capital in your country.
But here’s the problem: You must compete with other poor countries that also need capital. Corporations are not stupid, & so they let you know that if you want their investment, you must compete with other countries by:
Keeping workers’ wages low
Having few laws to regulate conditions of work (overtime, breaks, health & safety conditions, age of workers), or not enforcing the laws that are on the books
Having weak environmental laws
Making sure that workers can’t organize unions; having low taxes on corporate profits, etc.
Basically, companies hold an auction for their investments. The countries who offer the companies the most “freedom” are the ones who get the investment.
THE GAME:
The goal of the game is to win the game by ending up with the most game points after 3 auction rounds. We’ll try for three rounds. Let’s see how it goes.
Each country team’s goal is to “win” by attracting capital. The team that bids the 3rd highest number of “Friendly-to-capital” credits in a round is awarded 100 game points; the team with the 2ndhighest number of Capital credits is awarded 50 game points; & the team with the 3rd highest Capital credits is awarded 25 game points. The other teams get no points for the round. The auction is “silent” – which means you don’t know until the end of each round who has bid what.
Again, Capital will go where the people are “friendliest” to it. However, the “friendlier” you are to Capital, the angrier it may make your own people. For example, Capital wants workers to work for very little & not to worry about environmental laws. But that could start demonstrations or even rebellions, which would not be good for Capital or for you as leaders of your country. That’s why the team bidding the highest number of Capital credits does not get the highest number of game points.
What to do / how to play:
I’ll be Big Capital. In fact, I’ll be The Big Evil Corporation. So I have some business that could really stimulate your country’s economy and create jobs, but being Big Evil Corporation personified, I want the cheapest, youngest workers and the least amount of rules about unions, workers, or polluting the environment. Because that’s the kind of pig I am. You get to be the corrupt leader of a developing country. Lucky you. Be careful not to anger your people to the point that they riot. So, make me an offer. Lots of other countries also want my business, so this is a competitive auction.
1. Decide what country you will represent. It can be a real country or a fake one.
2. Read the charts below where points are listed and decide where to compromise, if anywhere;
3. Post what your country is offering The Big Evil Corporation in each of the bulleted areas below.
Minimum wage credits
Child labor credits
Worker organizing credits
Taxation rate credits
Environmental laws credits
4. Do it again. And again, if enough people are participating.
I’ll calculate points (or you can) after each round of bidding. There is a graded questionnaire on the next screen and participation is worth points here.
TRANSNATIONAL CAPITAL AUCTION CREDIT SHEET
MINIMUM WAGE/HR.
“Friendly-to-Capital” credits
$5.00………….. zero credits $2.50………….. 46 credits $0.55… ….76 credits
$4.75…………..10 credits $2.25………….. 49 credits $0.45…….79 credits
$4.50…………..15 credits $2.00………….. 52 credits $0.35…….82 credits
$4.25…………..20 credits $1.75………….. 55 credits $0.30…….85 credits
$4.00…………..25 credits $1.50……………58 credits. $0.25…….88 credits
$3.75…………..30 credits $1.25……………61 credits $0.20…….91 credits
$3.50…………..33 credits $1.00……………64 credits $0.15…….94 credits
$3.25…………..37 credits $0.85…………….67 credits $0.10…….97 credits
$3.00…………. 39 credits $0.75…………….70 credits $0.05…….100 credits
$2.75…………..43 credits $0.65…………….73 credits
CHILD LABOR
Child labor below 16 is illegal / enforced ……….. 0 credits
Child labor below 16 is illegal/ weakly enforced…15 credits
Child labor below 16 is illegal / not enforced…….30 credits
Child labor below 14 is illegal / enforced…………50 credits
Child labor below 14 is illegal/ weakly enforced…70 credits
Child labor below 14 is illegal/ not enforced……..85 credits
No Child labor laws…………………………………100 credits
WORKER ORGANIZING
Unions fully legal / allowed to organize…………………………….0 credits
Unions fully legal / some restrictions on right to strike…………..15 credits
Only government approved unions legal/ some restrictions……..30 credits
Only government organized unions allowed………………………45 credits
Unions banned / no right to strike…………………………………..60 credits
Unions banned/no right to strike/ military stationed in factories…85 credits
Suspected Union organizers jailed/military used against strikes..100 credits
TAXATION RATE ON CORPORATE PROFITS
75% ……..0 credits 35%…………40 credits
70%……….5 credits 30%…………50 credits
65%………10 credits 25%…………60 credits
60%………15 credits 20%………..70 credits
55%……..20 credits 15%………..75 credits
50%……..25 credits 10%………..80 credits
45%……..30 credits 5%………….90 credits
40%……..35 credits No taxes….100 credits
ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
Strict environmental laws / enforced………………… 0 credits
Strict environmental laws / weakly enforced………..15 credits
Strict environmental laws / not often enforced………30 credits
Some environmental laws / enforced……………….50 credits
Some environmental laws / weakly enforced……..70 credits
Some environmental laws / not often enforced……85 credits
Almost no environmental laws……………………..100 credits

Our course was 2024 SU [5W1] Eng Comp II:Writ and Rhetoric ENG 112 202 [5834] [L

Our course was 2024 SU [5W1] Eng Comp II:Writ and Rhetoric ENG 112 202 [5834] [L

Our course was 2024 SU [5W1] Eng Comp II:Writ and Rhetoric ENG 112 202 [5834] [Lecture] [Bronx CC]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvTOwB8x7kE
Discussion 10: Final Thoughts on the Course
Previous Next
TopicThreads
Posts
Last Post
Discussion 10: Final Thoughts on the Course
Contains unread posts
Starts Jul 29
As Discussion Boards are great for reflection, let’s do some reflecting. You’ve made it to the end of the course. Congratulations! What did you think of the course? Do you enjoy fully online courses? Do you think you will take more in the future? Was the course useful for developing your critical thinking and writing skills, or was it just another obstacle on the way to your ultimate goal. Is there any chance you will enroll for even more English classes?
(We have great electives ranging from Shakespeare to The Modern American Short Story, and everything in between. The electives I teach most often are ENG 135 Popular Culture & Literature, ENG 140 Folklore, and ENG 156 Children’s Literature. All of these courses count towards your Writing Intensive requirement, and many of them cover other requirements as well.)
So let’s kick back our boots and reflect. What did you like most? What did you like least? What will you carry with you into the future?
***Posting Guidelines***
Length: You will be graded on the quality and depth of your posts. Initial posts must be a minimum of 250 words. Response posts must be a minimum of 50 words each.
Engagement: The more you engage, the better you will do. I encourage you to engage deeply with the time period, the primary source under consideration, and your fellow classmates’ thoughts and ideas.
Plagiarism: Posts must be entirely in your own words. Engaging in any form of plagiarism, including copying and pasting from Internet sources, reusing other students’ posts, and using artificial intelligence are strictly prohibited. All posts must exhibit a 0% similarity score on www.zerogpt.com. Academic dishonesty will not be tolerated and will receive an automatic zero.

This recently written essay for my class with the same title. My teacher has dec

This recently written essay for my class with the same title. My teacher has dec

This recently written essay for my class with the same title. My teacher has decided our final will be substantial revision or reimagining of the paper.
Extend or challenge the original argument, and include
the analysis of two new sources in the revised argument:
Explore additional perspectives on the cultural anxiety that was
analyzed (consider another society’s, culture’s, or subculture’s
depictions and ideas related to the cultural anxiety you
discussed; incorporate a scholarly argument that extends or
complicates the original position; compare the original
artifact to a new artifact that extends or challenges the original
position).
Extend the original argument by critiquing the artifact’s
portrayal of a different cultural anxiety