Category: Empathy

What is empathy?

To the general public, empathy is most commonly understood through phrases such as ‘putting yourself in someone else’s shoes’ or ‘seeing things through their eyes.’ This suggests imagining what it is like to experience the feelings and circumstances of another person and having the capacity to understand them yourself while maintaining some level of emotional detachment. In a clinical setting, empathy extends beyond a patient’s history, diagnosis, or treatment. The expression of empathy differs from that of sympathy, which is how a healthcare professional communicates with their patient.

Why is empathy important?

Paramedics are responsible for establishing rapport, providing the best care, and possible outcome possible for a patient. This is achieved through the use of critical reasoning, communication, and drawing on their academic knowledge. To a healthcare professional such as a paramedic, empathy is the validation of a patient’s feelings, which may include fear, anxiety, or stress. Empathy is, therefore, an essential core skill as it supports the establishment of trust between a patient and the healthcare professional, making it an integral component in establishing a therapeutic relationship (1). In a clinical context, empathy can facilitate more accurate diagnoses and efficient treatment, contrasting from sympathy, which can ultimately impede effective treatment and objective diagnoses (2). When a paramedic has the ability to imagine the situation from their patient’s point of view, it can reveal to them ways to improve their care, which may not have been considered before. In addition, a heightened level of empathetic behaviour has shown to increase patient compliance with medications and greater overall satisfaction (3).

How showing empathy affects patients

A paramedic is usually a patient’s first point of contact in a medical emergency. Regardless of the length of duration, these environments are often highly emotional and can be distressing to most. Additionally, many interactions between paramedics and patients include those a part of vulnerable groups or populations who are subject to negative stereotyping (4). The empathy displayed by paramedics during this period of contact frequently affirms how a patient may perceive other medical professionals throughout their continued exposure to health services (5). However, regardless of overwhelming support for the benefits of an empathetic approach, there is no universally agreed-upon definition in relation to its implementation in patient care (6).

How does one maintain empathy?

In the context of education, empathy is acknowledged as a personal trait; consequently, it is also tangible and can be a learned behaviour. Therefore, through educational approaches and intervention, empathy can be developed and improved with appropriate teaching styles (7). This recognition suggests that tertiary institutions play a significant role in developing empathy amongst paramedic undergraduates. A proven method to improve students’ empathy is the inclusion of simulation-based training (8). Although the benefits are extensively studied, the general lack of empathy education has been slow to improve; however, paramedic programs have started to standardise summative assessments that take a holistic approach to patient interactions as of recently as 2017 (9). Despite compelling evidence that highlights the importance of empathy in patient care, studies suggest that current undergraduate health students still display less empathy than previous generations (7).

A longitudinal study conducted among Canadian paramedicine students investigated the levels of empathy in first-year students attending Fanshawe College. The publication revealed that students’ empathy levels decreased as they progressed through their first year of study (3). It is suggested that the decline can be associated with the change from idealism to realism, as well as an expected general response to increased workload and responsibilities (1). It is well known that a majority of emergency callouts are to elderly patients (10) and mental health crises (11), rather than acute traumas. It may be a misconception of many students that a large proportion of cases are not an exacerbation of chronic illness or falls, a leading cause of injury for the aged population, however, this is the reality of their career (1). Nonetheless, paramedic students are still exposed to explicit and graphic examples of potential scenarios they may encounter early on. This allows them the opportunity to question whether they can realistically manage the gravity of their career. (1)

Due to only a handful of studies completed, most of which focus on paramedic students rather than paramedics, empathy in qualified paramedics is not well understood. Paramedicine students generally show lower levels of empathy than students in the fields of nursing and midwifery (12, 13). This is especially apparent towards substance abusers and mental health crises, with males scoring lower overall empathy scores than their female counterparts on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (14, 15). Mean empathy scores also appeared to decrease for cases of intellectual disability and attempted suicide among Fanshawe College students (3). The reasoning behind lower demonstrated empathy scores towards substance abuse patients may be due to the perception that abuse patients are a waste of medical expenses, treatment, and a burden on medical resources (16).

Compassion fatigue and burnout

After prolonged exposure to a stressful environment, healthcare providers may experience decreased levels of empathy, otherwise described as compassion fatigue. A study conducted among nurses in 2018 revealed that the prevalence of compassion fatigue affects not only the quality of care provided to a patient but also the provider’s own quality of life (17, 18). Low empathy also acts as a contributing factor to high burnout among healthcare providers and vice versa (19). Due to the nature of a general paramedic’s workload, stressful shift work, long hours, and a poorly maintained work-life balance can contribute to burnout. Paramedics are exposed to many distressing and potentially traumatic scenarios. This makes communication between partners essential, as they both experience a series of emotions together. Communication and empathy between the two establishes a positive relationship and a healthy support system, which may help reduce burnout.

Empathy is intrinsically people-based. This means that the skill of empathy is developed over the time one spends with others in a similar role or environment (20). Through an understanding of one another, a team’s ability to cooperate work together is enhanced, leading to better patient care and outcomes. Empathetic colleagues can make each other feel more supported in their work and have a positive experience on those around them.

Empathy is a core skill

Empathy is explored in many aspects and contexts when observing the role of it as a core skill for a paramedic. It is arguably one of the most critical skills due to its nature and presence in multiple relationships that are established by healthcare professionals (20). Empathy is a significant factor in the establishment of a positive therapeutic relationship between a patient and their provider (1). The importance of empathy is further heightened when faced with vulnerable peoples and populations (4). Without an establishment of trust, as achieved through displaying empathy, a rapport cannot be built, and the likelihood of patient compliance decreases. Empathy is also present in workplace relationships between paramedics in order to establish healthy support systems. While it is known that lack of empathy or contrastingly, excess empathy, can lead to burnout or compassion fatigue (17-19), this only supports its importance and the significance connected to its understanding. The correct balance and application of empathy is essential to paramedics in order to carry out their job successfully and comfortably, however, there are many other essential skills a paramedic should possess to successfully carry out their jobs. Some of which include resilience, adaptability, communication, and the ability to work well under pressure. While empathy itself is a fundamental core skill, without application in combination with other skills, it would not produce a competent paramedic.

Though many studies were focused on other sectors of healthcare, mainly in-hospital, it was found that students displayed a lack of empathy early on during their paramedicine education. With the correct resources and application of teaching, this can be combatted to ensure the integral core skill of empathy is developed as required. In order to provide further depth into the importance of empathy in qualified paramedics, further studies should be encouraged to assess their levels.

Forgiveness is the deliberate act of releasing feelings of vengeance or resentment towards someone for their wrong doings. Forgiveness brings the induvidual immense peace of mind and frees them from unnecessary anger. People make mindless mistakes everyday and what would happen if you were never forgiven for those? I think everybody deserves the chance to apologise and make positive changes in life and prove themselves to be a better person and this is why.

Mistakes are a good, unavoidable thing. The human race learns mostly by trial and error. Usually when things we have done go wrong, we regret them. Mistakes help us take in the truth quickly and sometimes brutally. Maybe if you are just driving that few extra miles faster to get to work on time? The concequences of those actions you won’t soon forget. Realising what you have done wrong, how likley are you to do the same again knowing the possible outcome? Mistakes are important because they take us from a mindset of improvement to a mindset of expansion. Meaning that even though most people desire a succsessful life, mistakes we make humble us and make us look towards a more expanded open lifestyle rather than perfection even if this defeats us at the time of the mistake, in the end it emphasises the idea of a more free lifestyle we actually want. In addition to this, mistakes are part of the ‘game of life’ which could mean more stupidity, setbacks and slip-ups involved. Which tests our engagement on the world around us rather than a typical routine. We all make mistakes, whether you wrote the date down wrong this morning or you forgot to put those papers on your bosses desk that she needed for yesterday and no later. Accidents are the learning curve we all deserve to experience.

Empathy is to understand and relate to how someone else’s emotions and how they are feeling. It is putting yourself in someone else’s shoes. When an individual needs empathy from us it is extremely crucial to expand your way of thinking to help them and this brings a colossal amount of satisfaction. Trying to understand the intentions of why another has made the decisions they have is hard but not impossible. To start off, how do you think someone else would see you? What is the first thing they’d notice or think about? Looking at things from someone else’s perspective helps you move on in the situation and also in life. There are approximately 7.442 billion people in the world. Seeing things from only your perspective you’re ultimately missing out on the remarkable opinions and extraordinary stories of 7 billion others. Empathy is a major key to forgiveness, this is because “Before you can even offer forgiveness, there needs to be some kind of mutual understanding of the conflict’ said Gabrielle S. Adams, Assistant Professor, London Business School.

‘The willingness to change allows us to see new things that often go ignored. We begin to accept ideas that help us to grow in ways that most others would pass by, simply because these ideas aren’t conventionally accepted.’ – Anthony from AuthenticGrowth.com. Your attitiute makes a stupendous impact on the changes you let into your life. Opportunity is all around us and if you are able to understand what negative tendencies you have and are willing to change them you can reach your goals much more effectively. For instance, a devastating but inspiring story about a man named Mukhtar Gusengajiev, he served three long years in prison as a young teenage boy for fighting. During his imprisonment he studied mediation and flexibility to free him of the regrets of his life before that he felt guilty about. When he was released from jail he felt empowered and performed in a circus before taking up an acting role in a movie with Jean-Claude Van Damme. The movie was not released but Mukhtar landed in Vegas where he became world-famous for being extremely flexible. He now performs around the world and gives mightily motivational speeches about reaching your goals. This proves that he started off as a lousy teenager then lost his negative tendencies by instead of fighting, started making a differece by inpriring young children to do well in life and became a greater more succeful person due to meditiation and mindfulness. Gusengajiev earned his forgiveness by showing he had changed and made an efficacious impact on his own life and began to influence others to do the same and to learn from his mistakes also proving the concequences of inflicting unholesome behaviour can be utterly life changing.

Holding a grudge is a problem. What’s the point in holding a grudge? It doesn’t make you feel any less angry and it definitely does not make us any happier. Carrying around the weight of anger and hatred toward someone leaves us feeling tired and worn out by the constant reminder of their presence which is not a healthy mindset. Letting go of a grudge means to stop paying so much attention to the person’s wrong doing and instead pay attention to how that person has reacted to what they have done and move past it. For every negative there is a positive, resentment towards another can be prevented by seeing the silver lining, which might be that you have learned a beneficial lesson or a bigger understanding of the situation or that person. Making room for happiness means to let go of the cynical, negative thoughts and feelings. The average human lives shockingly only until they are 79. Life is far too short to hold a grudge.

Forgiveness actually has many health benefits. One being fewer depression symptoms. It’s estimated that a whopping 15 percent of the adult population will experience depression at some point in their lifetime. However forgiveness provides us with healing resulting in the feeling of compassion and purpose, substituting the feeling of depression. Not forgiving increases stress, study author Loren Toussaint, an associate professor of psychology at Luther College in Iowa says “If you don’t have forgiving tendencies, you feel the raw effects of stress in an unmitigated way. You don’t have a buffer against that stress.” Researchers have firgured out that people who are more forgiving can cope with stress better and may not have irrational reactions to things that could cause stress. Having forgivness in your heart brings peace of mind, a prime example being Margaret and Barry Mizen, Jimmy Mizen’s parents. Jimmy was killed the day after his 16th birthday by 19 year old Jake Fahri in 2008. Margaret said: “I feel it was absolutely right in my heart to forgive him because by forgiving him I’m able to do all the things I want to do, it allows me to look out the window and see the sun shining and the flowers blossoming. If I didn’t it would fill me with so much hate that I wouldn’t be able to do these things.’ Forgivness releives the mind on negative toxins and helps you continue on life happily.

In retrospect, I believe that everyone deserves forgiveness because everyone makes mistakes and life is much too short to blame people for these wrong doings forever. Being forgiving also improves your mental and physical health and unquestionably opens your mind to a different perspective, that possibly being the view point of another. I urge you, next time someone makes a bad desicion or reflecting on a previous event, to try and understand how they are trying to fix the problem and although it may be difficult, forgive them. Even if it takes days, months or years. Give yourself and others the peace of mind you absolutely deserve.

Introduction

Among some of the best ways of increasing our understanding is trying to explain phenomena that we already know and questioning why these phenomena are happening . A curious mind is an essential tool that helps the bearer increase their learning and understanding of various occurrences to the best of their capabilities. Although there is no rational explanation for some observations such as why a cow may eat green grass but still produce white milk? Or why are the planets spherical? We could increase our understanding of such events by maintaining an analytical approach toward such cases and other related issues. One may wonder why is it necessary to try and understand general information differently while we already have the agreed-upon scientific and non-scientific explanations for these occurrences? This is a case that may get answered from a growth and development perspective. While growth is a process that reaches a certain point in our lives and eventually stops, development is a life-long process that occurs continuously in the presence of an individual until death (Mercer & Reynolds, 2002). Through increasing our understanding of these phenomena or seeking different view-points, we are growing in terms of our developmental aspects which helps make us more accomplished beings with a higher level of understanding.

Alfred Adler states that “Seeing with the eyes of another, listening with the ears of another, and feeling with the heart of another.” In this quote, Alfred Adler gives a clear understanding of the word empathy. Empathy is when you share and recognize the emotion of another person or being. It often involves seeing yourself in the situation and sharing their emotions (Burton, 2015). Empathy is almost always confused with sympathy and compassion. Sympathy is defined as the feeling of care or concern of someone. Both terms have an origin of the Greek term “pathos”. “Pathos” means passion and suffering. Although both empathy and empathy involve having a form of concern for someone. Most individuals do not realize there is a significant difference between empathy and sympathy. The biggest difference between sympathy and empathy is perspective. Sympathy does not involve a shared perspective or shared emotion (Burton, 2015). For instance, an individual who grew up poor would feel empathy towards someone who is currently poor. This individual would more likely be able to understand the emotion and heartache of being poor. However, an individual who never grew poor would most likely feel sympathy since they never experienced being poor. There is a clear difference between the statements “I use to feel how you feel” (empathy) vs “I am sorry you feel that way ” (sympathy). I strongly believe that most individuals use sympathy as a response to most situations. Empathy is only really used when we have experienced a similar encounter or emotion as someone else.

Examples

Physicians in society have the important role of serving the needs of patients. These visits can go easily bad, well, or okay. From experience, good visits usually consist of the doctor being attentive, sympathetic, and understanding. On the other hand, bad visits consist of the doctor still being sympathetic but lacking other traits. Both doctors can be sympathetic to patients, however, they can lack empathy. ‘In order to be perceived as empathic, the observer must convey this understanding to the subject. During the initial phase of the process, the observer must not only identify but also understand the basis of the subject’s feelings” (Hirisch, 2007). Its common knowledge that most doctors go through grueling hours of studying for years. Medical students study human anatomy, physiology, and medicine repeatedly during school. It’s safe to assume that medical instructors have taught their students to be empathetic towards patients. However, I can only imagine medical school education does not heavily emphasize the importance of being empathetic and sympathetic in their curriculum. Well treating patients most physicians do not imagine being patient’s shoes, they are figuring out they can relieve the patient’s worries. For example, a physician taking care of a patient that has excruciating pain it’s not thinking about how severe the patient’s pain might be. Although the doctor is sympathetic, he resolves the patient’s pain with pain killers and quickly tries to diagnose the patient after viewing lab results. This physician is sympathetic, not empathic. A doctor that has suffered from something similar or closely encountered in a similar case is more likely to use empathy while treating this patient. Empathy focuses on developing skills, attitudes and moral concern rather than just urging

Empathy, unlike compassion or sympathy, is not something that just happens to us, it is a choice to make to pay attention to extend ourselves. It requires an effort'(Rettner, 2016). We all have experienced an interaction with another human that was extremely uncomfortable. It could be conversations about financial issues, relationship problems or family deaths. The usual response to these conversations is “I’m sorry to hear that”, “It will get better”, or “So sorry for your loss”. Yes, these responses are very sympathetic. However, for someone that never dealt with life issues like financial issues, breakups, deaths; can they really understand? We can absorb their pain the feel, but can we really feel it? The answer is no. We don’t understand their pain until experience something similar happens to us. However, we can closely listen, be supportive and try to put ourselves in their shoes. As we know, human emotions are complex as every individual is different from the other in their respective attributes (Greenberg et al. 2011). Therefore, by possessing empathy, it requires one to have a clear understanding of how the other party feels regarding a particular situation and how they think the events leading to that specific outcome should have unfolded. An empathetic person is therefore required to put themselves in the shoes of the other person and try to understand the situation at hand from this individual’s point of view (Snow, 2000).

Over the past decade, there has been a significant increase in mass shootings in the USA. Just this year, the number of mass shootings across the U.S. has outpaced the number of days this year, according to a gun violence research group (Silverstein, 2019). Unfortunately, the normalcy of gun violence is very prominent in the U.S. Almost every month there a breaking news story about a mass shooting. After hearing the news about a new shooting, almost everyone watching is usually devastated and shocked. People often express about they need to be aware of their surroundings in public. Although these events are terrifying, people usually go back to their normal routines a couple of weeks later. We humans like to forget things that distress us to preserve our well- being. Although we are sympathetic, we don’t really comprehend and process these tragedies as a victim would. Victims of these tragedies suffer from injuries. PTSD, and other traumatic obstacles. It also not rare for victims to make a significant change in their stance in politics. After experiencing the Vegas shooting, in 2017 Caleb Keeter posted on his twitter that he was changing his stance on the Second Amendment. In his post, he expressed how wrong he was regarding gun control. He never imagined that he and his band members would ever experience horror like that. He expressed that the government should regulate guns and implement a background check for gun owners (Howard, 2018). Keeter experience is a perfect example of people not really understanding something until it happens to them.

Empathy is not just quality it is a higher state of existence. There is the probability that understanding is a guardian angel coined to a term. A guardian angel, according to popular belief, is a supernatural being who plays the role of protection and consolation in times when a person is exposed to trying or tempting situations that may be difficult to handle. When an empathetic person walks into your life at this particular time, they try to console the suffering party and tries to give them consolation as well a possible explanations for the various reasons why things might have turned out as they did and the steps that the individual in suffering may take to restore normalcy in their lives.

This may, therefore, lead to the inference that empathy is not merely a quality but a compellation by a higher force or authority to accomplish a given task. Most people may look at the term from a superficial point of view and think that empathy could only get offered by an individual close to you and one who understands whatever challenges that you may be going through. However, pose a minute and contemplate about a breakup situation in love. A partner whom you fully trusted with a lot of thing in your life may take advantage of this and exploit you for their benefits and lead to a breakup. While drowning your sorrow at the bottom of a bottle in a bar, a total stranger walk up to you, engages you in a conversation that changes your perspective on the whole issue by appealing to your emotion and actually leaves you feeling empowered and even much better.

The ability of this individual to understand your feelings at a time of desperation and even make you feel better about a situation that you thought was the worst is not merely empathy. To reinforce on this point, what possible rational explanation could explain the presence of these two individuals at the same place and time where one appears to have needed the other without any form of prior communication? Also bearing in mind that there were other people in the bar, how does the ’empathetic individual’ single out the one specific individual to start a conversation with?

Conclusion

From the evidence presented above, it is possible to infer that empathy is not merely the ability to understand other people’s feelings and give the required response. Insight is a much higher state of existence in which the bearer of this quality may be perceived to be operating at a position of higher understanding in the absence of the knowledge of so doing (Hornblow, 1980). Empathy is an involuntary response which the individuals who possess it to respond towards without knowing and perform tasks beyond their comprehension in a simplistic approach from the external observers’ point of view, but at a higher level of sophistication form the insider’s approach (Weiner & Auster, 2007).

References

1. Mercer, S. W., & Reynolds, W. J. (2002). Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract, 52(Suppl), S9-12.
2. Howard, M. (2017, October 4). America’s Gun Crisis Is A Crisis Of Empathy.
3. Hojat, M. (n.d.). A Definition and Key Features of Empathy in Patient Care. Empathy in Patient Care, 77–85. doi: 10.1007/0-387-33608-7_6
4. Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 43.
5. Silverstein, J. (2019, September 1). There have been more mass shootings than days this year. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mass-shootings-2019-more-mass-shootings-than-days-so-far-this-year/.
6. Snow, N. E. (2000). Empathy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 37(1), 65-78.
7. Weiner, S. J., & Auster, S. (2007). From empathy to caring: Defining the ideal approach to a healing relationship. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 80(3), 123.
8. Hornblow, A. R. (1980). The study of empathy. New Zealand Psychologist, 9(1), 19-28.

Empathy is the ability to recognise and understand what someone is going through.( Burnard 1992) defines it as the ability to enter the perpetual world of the other person to see the world as they see it. Sympathy is feeling sorry for themselves. Empathy becomes a shared experience at both cognitive and emotional levels (Kozier erb and Blais). With sympathy the feeling is not shred. Empathy make the other person experiencing a situation stronger while sympathy actually weaknesses an individual. Empathy can build reasonable bonds between people while sympathy does not. Empathy is a feeling related to an action, it feels the pain and tried to alleviate it. Sympathy relates well with pity. Empathy turns on emotion into accomplishment. Sympathy is used to convey commiseration or feeling of sorrow for someone who is experiencing a misfortune. In sympathy one does not know how it feels to be in their shoes whereas in empathy one actually experiences the felling.

Empathy is seeing with the eyes of another, listening with the eyes of another feeling with the heart of another. Empathy refers to feeling what the other person is experiencing whereas sympathy means that one understands what the other person is feeling even without feeling it themselves. Empathy is about feeling and co-experiencing the emotions of an individual with whom we connect to. Sympathy is about support or care and feeling sorry for people.

In order to achieve sympathy an individual has to give fully their attention to a person or a group. Distraction has a big impact and limit the capacity to produce strong effective responses. (Tuck, Dennis, Gatchel, Robert (2002).

If distractions are removed, people are able to attend to and respond to a variety of emotional experiences and subjects. Attention facilitates the experience of sympathy. Sympathy can be achieved by the need of an individual or group. Needs can be different depending on the type of the situation. These can include vulnerability of different kinds of pain which need unique reactions from human and can range from attention to sympathy. An individual with a cancerous condition can draw a stranger feeling of sympathy than one with a cold.

Sympathy can be achieved also du to the vulnerability of the group such as the sick, elderly or young children. Moods of individual, pervious experiences, social connections can also influence sympathy. People who would have experienced similar situations or those with positive state in their mood are more likely to produce sympathy. So individuals can be in a positive mood to achieve sympathy.

In order to achieve sympathy, there is a need for clear communication. Verbal communication is good and understandable when expressing sympathy. This can be done by acknowledging the current condition being experienced by an individual or group. Non verbal communication such as facial expression, bodily motions and physical contact can be seen to achieve sympathy. These are best understood by observers and not by one experiencing them. Pat at the back, touch of the hand can be ways of achieving sympathy. The combination of verbal and nonverbal communication facilitates the expression and achievement of sympathy.

Sympathy can be achieved due to specific circumstances. If someone is geographically closer it attracts sympathy. People who are more like otherssurrenderthem also attracts sympathy. (Dhanda J 2000)

Without recognizing the value of empathy, I struggled to sacrifice my self-interest which led to me facing difficulty in finding the people that fill my loneliness and who accept me. Grades were important to me, through much of my schooling life I focused on grade prioritizing it over anything and everything else. I put these self-interests above everything else in my life. So, when I was in middle school I managed to make a few friends I should’ve tried to be a better friend, empathizing with them even at the cost of my own interests. But, at that time I hadn’t learned anything about empathy to me, I thought of friends as something I had control over, where I could “Flex and [they’d] dance” (i. 6). I had no concept of empathy, so when the teacher came up to me and told me that those friends were bringing my grades down, I decided to distance myself from them. With no real understanding of the value of empathy I couldn’t bring myself to sacrifice some of my own self-interests and as a result I spent much of those years unable to find friends and escape my loneliness. I was alone, pushing everyone else out just to save my own grades I was left with no one who would actually accept me. I wasn’t able to recognize the value of empathy when it mattered the most, because of that I struggled to sacrifice my own self-interests for my friends which led to me finding myself with no one to fill my loneliness or accept me. I focused only on self-interest and completely ignored empathy, because I wouldn’t empathize with others I couldn’t find anyone who would accept me. Because I couldn’t sacrifice some of my own self-interest in order to empathize with others I found myself with a deep sense of loneliness.

However If I was able to recognize that not sacrificing my own self-interests is causing my feeling of loneliness then I could begin to realize the value in empathy. Even after those events I’d find another set of good friends if I just simply waited. However, time flew by and most friendships didn’t last for more than a couple months. No matter how hard I tried nothing seemed to work, I never felt so lonely and couldn’t figure out why people distanced themselves away from me. I was finally able to find my reason in highschool. During a physics class I was able to make a friend, I was pretty happy as this meant that I would have a partner for classes and wouldn’t have to worry about my grades suffering as a result. However, I quickly realized through the very first lab we had together how completely useless he was. Not ever doing any work or helping out the group I wondered whether he even considered how the rest of the group even felt. This was it, this person didn’t care about anyone else, he prioritizes his own self-interest and doesn’t even think about sacrificing his time for others, I realized that this was the same way I looked at others. I never considered how others felt and simply acted on my own interests throwing my friends away when they got in the way of my self-interests and then pondering why no one ever stuck around and why my “phone never [rung]” (i. 7). They never bothered empathize with me and accept me because I didn’t even think about reaching out to them and accepting them. I finally saw that because I didn’t sacrifice a part of my own self-interests I pushed others away and was only left with loneliness. Through this I would slowly come to realize the value of empathy. Recognizing that I was overvaluing and my self-interest and not balancing it between empathy with others, I realized that if I wanted to escape the dread of my loneliness I would have to sacrifice a portion of my self-interest in order to seek out the individuals who would accept me.

Consequently, through recognizing the importance of sacrificing a portion of my own self-interest, I came to the realization that in order to escape my loneliness and find those who accept me I first had to recognize the importance of balancing empathy with self-interest. Through the person whom I talked to for a short period of time during physics class I was able to recognize why I couldn’t escape my loneliness and connect with others who could accept me. In robotics class I saw a kid whom I met once through family friends. Being the only person whom I knew we naturally started to become friends. I remember him asking one day to borrow a video game that I had. I figured that we were friends for long enough that I could trust him so I decided to lend it to him compromising my own interest, believing that he would eventually return it. Yet, a week goes by and he tells me that a robber came through the window and stole it. I’ll never know if robber actually came in with a ladder, climbed into his room, and only stole the one video game I gave him or not but what I did know was that I he wasn’t even able to apologize. Seeing this I was instantly able to realize that this individual like myself who also prioritized his own self-interests never being able to “imagine [the] life” (i. 17) of another person, resulting in him never sacrificing his own interests for others. I came to I realized that this wasn’t an individual who would fill my loneliness or even accept me and because of that I stopped trying to empathize with him. He made me to come to the realization that because he had an imbalance between empathy and self-interest he only focused on the needs of himself which push me and others away leaving him alone. Ultimately through this person I came to the epiphany that, without a proper balance between empathy and self-interest I wasn’t going to be able to find a way to fill the loneliness that I felt. In recognizing the value of empathy, I found the importance of sacrificing self interests and empathizing with others, this allowed me to come to the realization that in order to escape my own loneliness and find those who accept me I would first have to recognize the importance of balancing empathy with self-interest. I recognized the importance of balancing empathy and self-interest, with this I could begin to find those who will accept me, because I now knew how important it was to sacrifice some of my self-interest in order to empathize with others. This will eventually allow me to escape my own loneliness.

Ultimately, accepting the truths that I learned, I could recognize the value in empathy and the importance of balancing it with my self-interests. Learning the balance between the two allowed me the ability to escape my own loneliness and find those who accept me. The epiphany that I came to allowed me to recognize the importance of the balance between empathy and self-interest, meaning that if I wanted to escape my loneliness and find those who accept me then I also need empathy alongside my self-interests. During a group project for social studies I as usual found myself with no group. It was then that a person called out to me and asked if I wanted to be in their group, I was ecstatic and replied with a yet immediately. During that single moment I realized that this person was someone who chose not to partner with their friends and sacrifice that self-interest of theirs to ask me to join because I didn’t have a group. I saw that person as someone who empathize with others easily and because of what I learned through my previous experiences I decided to try my hardest and empathize with his dedication to the project ignoring the math test that was coming up the next day. Shortly after that group project we stopped talking and never really became friends but through him I realized that Inorder to escape my loneliness I had to balance my empathy and self-interest to find “Those who didn’t laugh at those of use who fell” (i. 41-42). I didn’t bother to empathize with those who laughed and didn’t care about others. Instead, I looked for those who didn’t laugh, ones I could empathize with and knew would accept me. Accepting my epiphany, I could sacrifice a part of my self-interests and only empathize with those who accept me, allowing me to escape my own loneliness. I recognized the importance of balancing empathy and self-interest, this allowed me to find those who accept me because I could sacrifice some of my self-interest in order to empathize with others which let me escape my loneliness.

Two contradicting theories of empathy share some similarities and differences. Firstly, both perception-action model and learned matching hypothesis suggest that empathy can be seen from human infants. However, they are different with respect to how they interpret the display of emotional cues in infants. The perception-action model (Preston & Waal, 2002) suggests that humans are more prone to show empathic patterns to others due to the evolutionary advantages. Conversely, learned matching hypothesis (Heyes, 2018) states that affect mirroring by caregivers provokes infants’ emotional contagion, which is one of the components of empathy. This discrepancy in theories can be attributed to ongoing debate of nature vs. nurture in psychology. Perception-action model and its supporting evidence add weight to the nature side, while learned matching hypothesis argues for the nurture side.

Empirical findings

Many researchers have provided valuable empirical findings that support or counteract one or the other theories of empathy. Melchers et al. (2016) conducted a study to investigate the heritability of empathy exploiting an extended twin design. In this study, they understood empathy as defined by Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright (2004); a phenomenon consisting of an affective emotional response and a cognitive side that are both equally important. An affective empathy refers to the observer’s emotional response to the affective response of others, while cognitive empathy refers to the observer’s ability to understand others’ feelings. Melchers and his colleagues used self-report questionnaire and emotion recognition task to assess the heritability of empathy in 743 twins and siblings. The result showed that the heritability estimates for affective and cognitive empathy are between 52 and 57% and 27% respectively. When the estimation of cognitive empathy heritability was corrected for heritability, the value rose to 53%. This result fits in well with proposed perception-action model of empathy. However, considering that these researchers used two different methods to measure the heritability (self-report and experimental data), this research suggests further research. Moreover, the fact that non-twin siblings and fraternal twins were included in the subjects lessens the reliability of findings.

On the other hand, a six-year longitudinal study conducted by Kataoka et al. (2019) showed an intriguing result that weighs up the belief that empathy can be enhanced. Their study aimed to observe whether a targeted educational program can enhance empathy in medical students. The training program focused on communication skills of these students. The level of empathy was estimated five times by Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). A total of 69 students’ data proved that the communication skills training fortified the level of empathy, indicated by significant increase on the JSE (Kataoka et al., 2019). Likewise, there has been substantial body of evidence that empathy can be augmented through appropriate training and learning. These studies back up the learned matching hypothesis which argues for incremental trait of empathy. However, the absence of sustained effect in mentioned study questions the preservation of such augmentation in empathy. In addition, given that such intervention studies have been conducted only in medical students, a further study in more general school setting is necessary.

Implications of theories of Empathy in learning context

The notion of empathy has been thoroughly researched in psychology because of its substantial role in many social and learning aspects. Therefore, it is of great importance to correctly examine whether empathy is an inborn trait or not. If empathy can be taught and enhanced through learning and training, we must strive to integrate such programs for enhancement of empathy in learning. According to Arghode et al. (2013), science teachers reported that empathy plays an important role in students’ learning. Knowing how empathy provides an emotional bridge between individuals that later promotes pro-social behavior (Riess, 2017), learning scientists should mind how these contrasting theories of empathy can have different implications in learning.

Conclusion

In this essay, I strived to provide two contradicting theoretical approaches of empathy and critically compare them in light of recent empirical findings. Many nativists have conceived that empathy is an innate trait and this perspective has been supported by perception-action model of empathy. Perception-action model suggests that humans are inclined to understand others’ emotional responses through their personal representations, which allow empathy to increase (Waal & Preston, 2017). Conversely, many recent researches have posed that empathy is learned. One of them is learned matching hypothesis which asserts that empathy depends on the matching mechanisms, formulated during the development of associative learning (Heyes, 2018). Although there is a plethora of evidence favoring nature aspect of empathy like mirror neuron heritability studies, recent findings in medical students have proven that empathy can surely be learned and enhanced (Kataoka et al., 2019). Considering empathy’s critical role in learning and pro-social behavior, we must clearly understand that empathy is a teachable trait, and further imply this finding in teaching and training.

References

1. Arghode, V., Yalvac, B., & Liew, J. (2013). Teacher Empathy and Science Education: A Collective Case Study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.921a
2. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34 (2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00
3. Chapman, M., Zahn-Waxler, C., Cooperman, G., & Iannotti, R. (1987). Empathy and responsibility in the motivation of children’s helping. Developmental Psychology, 23 (1), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.1.140
4. Field, T. M., Woodson, R., Greenberg, R., & Cohen, D. (1982). Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science (New York, N.Y.), 218 (4568), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123230
5. Field, T [Tiffany], Diego, M., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2009). Depressed mothers’ infants are less responsive to faces and voices. Infant Behavior & Development, 32 (3), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.03.005
6. Heyes, C. (2018). Empathy is not in our genes. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 95, 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.001
7. Kataoka, H., Iwase, T., Ogawa, H., Mahmood, S., Sato, M., DeSantis, J., Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2019). Can communication skills training improve empathy? A six-year longitudinal study of medical students in Japan. Medical Teacher, 41 (2), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1460657
8. Melchers, M., Montag, C., Reuter, M., Spinath, F. M., & Hahn, E. (2016). How heritable is empathy? Differential effects of measurement and subcomponents. Motivation and Emotion, 40 (5), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9573-7
9. Preston, S. D., & Waal, F. B. M. de (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25 (1), 1-20; discussion 20-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02000018
10. Ray, E., & Heyes, C. (2011). Imitation in infancy: The wealth of the stimulus. Developmental Science, 14 (1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00961.x
11. Riess, H. (2017). The Science of Empathy. Journal of Patient Experience, 4 (2), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373517699267
12. Waal, F. B. M. de, & Preston, S. D. (2017). Mammalian empathy: Behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 18 (8), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.72

Lack of Empathy Peter has for Ender: In Ender’s game, Peter shows lack of empathy towards Ender because he was the reason why Ender was ever born; even though Peter was really intelligent, he was also ruthless, untrustworthy, and a sociopathic person which made him not good enough to be part of International Fleet for the Third Invasion. His lack of empathy ruined almost all of Enders childhood while Ender was in North Carolina. When Peter played buggers vs astronauts with Ender, he almost killed Ender and a quote for it is that “I could kill you like this, Peter whispered. Just press and press until you’re dead. And I could say that I didn’t know it would hurt you, that we were just playing, and they’d believe me, and everything would be fine. And you’d be dead. Everything would be fine.”(Pg.12) This tells us the lacking empathy Peter has towards Ender. He doesn’t have emotions for Ender nor does he care how Ender feels or how much pain Ender was in, all he really wants is to get rid of Ender because he doesn’t want a better little brother, he doesn’t want a Third.

Connection 1: Peter and Hitler –

In Ender’s game, Peter uses violence to control those around him, tortures his younger brother Ender, his anger almost always leads Ender to pain, and he only acts for his own benefit. He is stated as a killer and killed squirrels. Later Peter takes the role of Locke and with his writing, power of words, and politics, he gains power and becomes a leader towards the ender of the Ender’s game. – Hitler a Bavarian soldier became a member of the Nazi party after WW1 and a chairman in 1921. With the power of words and political chaos, ‘he took control of a coalition government in 1933 and was given dictatorial powers’. Later ‘began WW2, allied with USSR and invaded Poland.’ His Anti-Semitic views, to create a perfect Aryan race by eliminating Jews’ killed more than six million Jews in the Holocaust. -The connections between Peter and Hitler is that both were killers(Peter killed squirrels and Hitler killed millions of Jews), both were lacking empathy(Peter wanted to kill Ender, doesn’t have emotions for Ender nor does he care how Ender feels or how much pain Ender was in and Hitler wanted a perfect Aryan race by eliminating Jews, didn’t care for the Jews), and both of them became strong political leaders which helped them gain power. Lack of Empathy Bonzo has for Ender: When Ender was put into the Salamander army, Bonzo had lacking empathy for Ender because his best toon leader was replaced with a launchie which he really hated and wanted to get rid of. Bonzo didn’t let Ender train with the army nor did he let him fight against other armies in battle, all Ender did was remain at the gate with his weapon undrawn and unfired. When Ender disobeyed Bonzo to help the Salamander army, he changed a defeat into a draw but Bonzo didn’t care, instead, he hurt him and a quote for it is ‘suddenly Bonzo swung at him, caught his jaw with a vicious open-handed slap. It knocked Ender sideways, into his bunk, and he almost fell. Then Bonzo hit him, hard, in the stomach. Ender dropped to his knees.'(Pg.95) This tells us the lacking empathy Bonzo has towards Ender. He hurt Ender just for disobeying him. Didn’t care how Ender would feel or how much pain he is in, nor did he care about how Ender changed a defeat into a draw. All he cares about is that Ender has disobeyed ‘no good soldier ever disobeys.'(Pg.95) Ender was traded to Rat Army and later became the commander of the Dragon Army, Ender’s Army won all their battles and Bonzo’s jealousy and lack of empathy increased and planned to kill Ender. When Ender was in the bathroom taking a shower, Bonzo ganged up on him to kill him but unfortunately, Bonzo’s fight let to his own death.

Connection 2: Bonzo and Mussolini –

In Ender’s game, Bonzo, a really aggressive commander uses violence against anyone who disobeys, lacks empathy towards Ender and dies an unexpected death. – Mussolini a member of the Socialist Party creates his own National Fascist party in 1919 after serving in WW1. He is ‘elected to Parliament in 1921’ and with joint leadership of King Victor Emmanuel III he became dictator of Italy taking total control. Allied with Hitler in WW2 and pressured into ‘adopting an Anti -Semitic policy in Italy. Later dismissed and imprisoned by the King in 1943 until rescued by German troops but later killed by his own people. – The connections between Bonzo and Mussolini is that both were leaders(Bonzo was a commander of Salamander Army and Mussolini was a dictator of Italy). Both had lack of Empathy(Bonzo hurt anyone who disobeys and Mussolini adopting an Anti -Semitic policy hurt lots of people). Lastly, both were killed(Bonzo was killed in a fight with Ender and Mussolini was killed by his own people).

Orson Scott Card called ‘Ender’s Game’ a fantasy story which talks about how human and buggers can live in a space, and it can be enjoyed as a tale about how Ender who is six years old and monitors by his brother and his sister that are older than him tries to find a safe and quite place which has not fear and no one kills him. Even though his enemies tried to control his life and destroy him, he tried to use empathy to know and identify his ability to be a good commander to destroy his enemies, and to be a leadership, understand how his smart can be his weakness, and to determine his limitations.

One of the most important character that ender tries to have in his life is how to be a good commander and using it to destroy all his enemies. Empathy is first crucial key for Ender to figure out his ability to be a good commander by using the effective strategy to against his enemies and destroy them. “You beat them. For a moment she was not afraid of his understanding. No you don’t understand. I destroy them. I make it impossible for them to ever hurt me again” (Card 238). Ender is a victim of war in many ways, but he is very good that he does not want to love his enemies and does not want to commiserate them. That is important point that should be excited in a good commander and Ender used this strategy to not seem sad and painful because of killing his enemies. “I don’t care if I pass your test, I don’t care if I follow your rules. If you can cheat, so can I. I won’t let you beat me unfairly – I’ll beat you unfairly first” (Card 293). This quote is important because it shows that how Ender tries to do anything to beat his enemies and others who want to attack him, and it proves that Ender does not care anything because he knows that if he wants to be a good commander does not need to listen to everyone and accepts their decision and choice. “Humanity does not ask us to be happy. It merely asks us to be brilliant on its behalf” (Card 277). This is most effective quote because it shows that how Ender’s efforts attempt to survive because happiness life needs sacrifices and ender tries to survive first then do what he wants to make him happy, so that is a good strategy that Ender tries to involve in the warfare. “And with that anger, he decided he was strong enough to defeat them- the teachers, his enemies” (Card 172). That shows the teachers want to teach Ender that depends on himself in a warfare not them because they try to teach Ender that good commander is depended on your power and strategy.

Second important character that Ender gets is a good leadership in this story because of he is friendly with his soldiers, so that Ender can easily get respect and trust from his soldiers and they suppose Ender as their leader in the warfare. Also, he uses empathy to know the people better, so that it makes Ender to be a good leadership. “Ender, I’m sorry, I’m sorry, I know how it feels, I’m sorry, I’m your brother, I love you” (Card 15). This quote explains that how they care him and try to show him their love even they want to beat him, and it encourages him to be a good leadership. “But I’ll be watching you, more compassionately than you know, and when the time is right you’ll find that I’m your friend, and you are the soldier you want to be” (Card 168). This quote is important because it shows that how Ender be happy if he knows that someone wants to be his friend and it helps Ender to have a secret friend because it facilitates the Ender’s way to be a good leadership with having an unusual friendship and showing them that Ender can have a friend. “It’s what I was born for, isn’t it? If I don’t go, why am I alive?” (Card 26). Everyone knows that they live for purpose to live, and also Ender has a purpose to live because he wants to have a life without any secret with no killing, and he knows that he should go to the Battle School to learn everything and to destroy his enemies, so he is a good leadership because he has a clear purpose. “Listen, Ender, commanders have just as much authority as you let them have. The more you obey them, the more power they have over you” (Card 102). Leadership is not an easy thing to gain because it needs power and support, and Ender wants a friend not a leadership because he thinks that he will be more freedom if he has a good friend instead of calling him leader.

The third important character that Ender identifies by using empathy is to understand how his smart can be his weakness because it is clear that he is alone in whole life, there is no anyone to help him, so that isolation becomes his weakness and affects his success. “It has a private meaning to Ender” (Card 121). Isolation is the main thing that affects Ender because it impacts on his ability, his success and also his empathy, and this quotes means that if something are private to someone, it means that he/she cannot communicate or show his ability, so it affects Ender to not communicate with someone in the Battle School. “If Graff was setting him up, there’d be no help unless he helped himself” (Card 33). His teachers and monitors want Ender to be isolated because they do not want to communicate with children and adults who are in the Battle School because they do not want that Ender rely himself on them. “The fear stayed, all through dinner as no one sat by him in the mess hall. The other boys were talking about things – the big scoreboard on one wall, the food, the bigger kids. Ender could only watch in isolation” (Card 41). This means that fear was the side effect of isolation for ender because there is no friend or teacher or any supports to rely himself because they want that Ender protects himself by having no one. “They do not want to teach me everything” (Card 69). Peter, Graff, and others who tries to isolate Ender because they try to teach Ender that friendship, love, etc are not his weakness, they want to clarify for Ender that enemies who are surrounded Ender will be his weakness if he could not find solution to his problems and if he will not be creative.

The final character that Ender could identify and know is his limitations, because he is young, his monitors and teachers could easily control his freedom and make him confinement. Because of Ender has nit freedom, it means that he has not free choice and has not power over his own life, so it makes Ender to feel uncomfortable because there is no one to support him visibly and protects him from his enemies. ”Human beings are free except when humanity needs them” (Card 35). This quote shows that how Graff wants to explain Ender that people don’t have freedom in their life ever, it needs to work hard individually to gain freedom, you can get freedom and have free choice when you destroy your destroy enemies and against all of them who want to use you for their own purpose. “Now he knew what he hated so much. He had no control over his own life. They ran everything” (Card 151). Even though Ender is a good commander and leadership and he is friendly with his soldiers, he should accept and do anything that they want to do, but by using his empathy he identifies that he must not show his strategies and his plans to anyone to not use against himself. ”Death is only your escape” (Card 73). When Ender tries to know his limitations by using empathy, he understands that if he wants to have a good and happiness life, he has to go to a quite place that no one tries to kill him or control his ability.

Endre has been successful because of his strength and smart, and when he tried to use empathy, it has a lot of positive effects oh his life that he could determine his ability to know how a good commander can destroy his enemies, to understand what is the role of a good leadership, to consider how his smart can have a positive and negative effect, and finally to identify his limitations and how to be avoid it from himself to be freedom. There are the good characters of Ender that he can gain in his life, and everyone hopes to have these clear characters because it makes him/her to have a power over his own life, and no one is able to use him/her to their purpose.

Empathy allows one to have the capacity to understand and share the feelings of another, yet it’s a difficult emotion to show. It is often absent in countless real-world situations as many are afraid of the vulnerability felt when empathy is put into motion. However, in literature, authors of informational and fictional texts are able to apply a variety of techniques to display the importance of empathy and encourage its readers to have a sense of understanding and compassion. In “Statement on the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.” and To Kill a Mockingbird, the authors utilize techniques such as diction and symbolism to evoke and encourage empathy from its audience.

In “Statement on the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.”, a speech by Robert F. Kennedy, Kennedy uses the rhetorical technique of diction to develop empathy in the reader. As Kennedy began his speech, he informed his audience that he had some “very sad news” for them. The “sad news for all of [the] fellow citizens” was of King’s assassination (Kennedy). Kennedy knew that King’s death would strike the nation with grief and hatred, and he must keep the nation unified despite this sudden tragedy. Therefore, he decided to use the word “sad” rather than a more sophisticated diction. Kennedy wanted his speech to appeal to all of his audience and not just to a certain race or class. People of different classes not only differ in wealth, status, race, but also education. A simpler word can appeal to a larger amount of audience because no matter their educational levels, race, or wealth, “sad” has a much higher probability of being recognized and understood. Common knowledge created connections and ultimately, empathy between the audience for they’ve gained compassion and understanding towards one another. Kennedy’s diction also applies to the reader in the same way. As Kennedy’s word choice evoked empathy from its audience, readers’ empathy will also intensify. Just like Kennedy’s audience, readers from various educational levels and vocabulary knowledge know of the word “sad”. Therefore, the reader can develop that similar connection as they understand Kennedy’s purpose of his speech and the purpose of diction. Another example of diction can be found in the poem “Lift Every Voice and Sing” by James Weldon Johnson. Johnson remembers of African Americans’ dark past as they “[tread]… thro’ the blood of the slaughtered” to reach their new hopeful future (Johnson 18). “Slaughtered” is an extremely impactful word that is often used to describe animals being murdered in large numbers in a gory way. By using this word, Johnson is comparing the treatment of African Americans to such of an animal. As readers encounter this powerful word, one will often have a deep discomfort as “slaughtered” is an extremely dominant word choice. Because this diction causes that discomfort in its readers, readers are now able to understand the pain and horror African Americans had experienced. Readers will begin to tap into that discomfort and empathize with African Americans for they can visualize and understand the violence inflicted upon the blacks and how much they’ve endured to reach the buoyant future. The authors’ choice of words greatly impacts the reader’s ability to develop empathy.

In Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, another technique is used: the literary device, symbolism. Lee uses the symbolism of a mockingbird. In the novel, it was “a sin to kill a mockingbird” for mockingbirds “don’t do one thing but make music for us to enjoy” (Lee 119). A mockingbird does not “eat up people’s garden” nor do they “nest in corncribs” (119). The mockingbird symbolizes innocence and beauty, and killing one would be considered as an act of cruelty. With this symbolism, readers can recognize each of the mockingbirds in Lee’s novel. These mockingbirds, like Tom Robinson, were forced by Maycomb to experience unfortunate events and ultimately a tragic end even though they were innocent and had done nothing but kind acts. Readers understand the unfairness and brutality as Maycomb blindly kills multiple mockingbirds in its town. Therefore, readers could empathize with those mockingbirds as they understand their suffering and injustice for they were wrongfully killed when they were nothing but an innocent soul. The use of symbolism is also present in Eugenia Collier’s short story, “Marigolds”. The young narrator, Lizabeth, found the marigolds belonging to her town’s outcast, Miss Lottie, frustrating for it was too beautiful in her dusty town. Therefore, Lizabeth destroyed Miss Lottie’s marigolds. However, the marigolds were not just simple flowers in Miss Lottie’s front porch; they represented the hope and happiness Miss Lottie desperately wanted to cherish despite her circumstances. She had “dared to create beauty in the midst of ugliness” and the “love and beauty and joy that had not been squeezed out by life, had been there in the marigolds she had so tenderly cared for” (Collier 62). Readers now understand that Miss Lottie was not the eccentric neighbor of Lizabeth who was considered odd for growing such beautiful things; she was simply a woman who had the courage to hold onto her hope and happiness despite her situation. Readers have now gained compassion and empathy for Miss Lottie and her destroyed marigolds, and along with it, her hopes and happiness.

The authors from “Statement on the Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.” and To Kill a Mockingbird used a variety of rhetorical techniques and literary devices to induce empathy in its readers. Strong and appropriate diction allows the author to get their message of empathy across. Symbolism relates a universal topic, such as empathy, to a deeper symbolic meaning and give readers a better insight into the author’s message. With these techniques, readers are able to understand the author’s and even the characters’ intentions, and eventually will gradually develop empathy.

Abstract

Empathy is a passionate inherent mental or physical power that has joint intellectual and emotional segments. It is essential in bioethics since it shapes the your mind and sensitivities that are vital in clinical consideration. Empathy is important in good discernment and judgment and offers access to other people’s encounters and feelings just as the ethical space, comprehended as the weal and burden of different people. It is significant to the establishments of prescription and social insurance rehearses. This examination paper centers around the regulating issues related with empathy in the medicinal services setting and their significance in clinical bioethics.

Introduction

There is an essential center of all moral conduct that comprises in monitoring the other individual as a human substance. The central exercise is that someone else is a person with a similar limit with regards to feeling, knowledge, agony, and joy as oneself. In morals, for the most part, this knowledge is vital. Strikingly, prevailing moral theory think about fair and unprejudiced thinking as the focal center of morals, though moral observation and understanding the person as a subject are put in the space of good epistemology, that is, the circle of obtaining the essential learning for regularizing decisions.

Additionally, to neglect the significance of moral subjectivity runs the threat of ignoring probably the most fundamental regularizing inquiries presently. The standardizing viewpoints that pursue from a concentration upon empathy keep running into inquiries regarding what is ethically great and underhandedness. Then again, for what reason do we give it a second thought, for what reason do we battle with inner voice, with blame, for what reason does the confidence of outsiders concern us in the first place? One approach to address these inquiry is phenomenological and mental and by understanding the job of empathy in good recognition. In addition, one response to inquiries concerning great and malice is that absence of regard for the enduring of others is a noticeable door opener to a wide range of shameless conduct.

The passionate personnel that is most pivotal in gaining admittance to understanding the psyches of other individuals is empathy. This examination paper will give a review of the idea and workforce of empathy and its mental and philosophical undertones just as its standardizing significance and significance in clinical bioethics.

The Conceptual And Philosophical Meaning Of Empathy

In the phenomenological custom after Edmund Husserl, empathy was instituted as ‘einfühlung,’ as an epistemological personnel of understanding the psyches of different people (Zahavi 1999). Empathy is usually viewed as a joined subjective and emotional limit of understanding the encounters, sentiments, and considerations of different people.

Presently, two issues promptly spring to mind. The first is this: When one plans to comprehend the encounters, emotions, and considerations of different people, do we talk about only duplicating their sentiments? Can we and would it be advisable for us to at all vibe a similar agony, distress, or satisfaction as our kindred people do? Would we be able to duplicate someone else’s considerations and their human encounters by inventive projection, by closely resembling derivations? Clearly, develop empathy is a cognizant and innovative undertaking of relating to and sharing the encounters of someone else. In any case, this does not recount to the entire anecdote about empathy. Empathy is likewise a progressively advanced type of direct social recognition, with no purposeful inductions being made in the first place.

At that point an attention will be on the standardizing parts of empathy. Empathy is certainly not a minor hermeneutic and epistemological limit. Empathy is additionally an ethical limit of identifying with the weal and misfortune of others. At long last, this examination paper will indicate how empathy is clinically critical, both as a good and epistemological limit.

A Definition Of Empathy and example

In the mental and philosophical unwritten law just as in medication, there are a large group of definitions and methods for getting empathy (Pedersen 2010). The most widely recognized and conceivable method for understanding empathy is to consider it to be a joint full of feeling and subjective limit of understanding the sentiments and encounters of someone else. Hoffman in his book on empathy and good advancement defines empathy as a ‘vicarious emotional reaction to someone else.’

Affective Empathy

Empathy has two particular and similarly profitable highlights. To start with, empathy is around a natural and unconstrained enthusiastic identification with someone else, what is called emotional empathy. Full of feeling empathy is the quick and automatic tactile experience of enthusiastic excitement in seeing the torment or enduring of someone else.

Full of feeling empathy is a direct tangible reaction to someone else’s emotional express, a passionate and unconstrained identification with someone else’s weal and hardship. It happens ordinarily in clinical work, e.g., when human services suppliers are sincerely contacted by observing the patient in agony or when they stress over the mental condition of grieving as to a relative of a truly sick kid. Emotional empathy is as though you feel uneasiness with the torment of another without duplicating his sentiments or feeling a similar sort of torment as the individual in question does. Furthermore, you don’t result in these present circumstances experience by method for similar to surmising or inventive projection. In that capacity, emotional empathy is the first admission to an all the more full-fledged comprehension of someone else.

Full of feeling empathy or empathic excitement (Hoffman 2000) is the unconstrained passionate condition of sympathy, of inclination revolt, enthusiastic agony, outrage, or disturb by a specific human occurrence. Full of feeling empathy is the thing that makes debriefing important for paramedics after sad mishaps. Full of feeling empathy is the thing that makes it critical to shield staff from visual pictures of injury, and, supposedly, it is the reason the specialist works not in the perceptual field of the entire body however just conceives some portion of the body, the part in which he is cutting his blade. Full of feeling empathy is the thing that makes proficient separation and separation essential and restoratively significant. Full of feeling empathy is likewise ethically significant, as will be clarified later.

Cognitive Empathy

Intellectual empathy is definitely not an unconstrained feeling, yet a type of projective creative ability. Psychological empathy is the capacity purposely just as non-intentionally to take someone else’s point of view, to place oneself in the shoes of another, and to endeavor to envision what it resembles for this individual to have a specific encounter or to be in a specific circumstance. Thinking in analogies is essential in psychological empathy; ‘it resembles when I had my medical procedure, or what I felt when my tyke was intense and genuinely sick.’ so, one’s own prior encounters are offered innovatively as a powerful influence for other people’s encounters and help us to comprehend these. This sort of projective creative energy is significant in empathy since it very well may be instructed and developed. Different stories, ailment accounts, and job taking can enable us to relate to other people. Likewise, intellectual empathy is objective since it keeps up a separation, candidly and subjectively, among yourself and the other. In psychological empathy, one can in any case keep up that one comprehends the agony of someone else and what the person in question is persevering. All things considered, it isn’t one’s own wretchedness; it isn’t your agony. You are in an unexpected circumstance in comparison to the next.

While full of feeling empathy runs the peril of enthusiastic sullying and empathic overarousal, psychological empathy keeps up an essential separation among self as well as other people. This sort of separation is imperative in expert hypothesis and care, specifically so as to keep fundamental expert separation in circumstances with extraordinary enthusiastic pressure and emotional over-burden. Nonetheless, it is likewise critical to imagine no intentional procedures of empathic insight, of legitimately understanding the other’s circumstance.

A few scholars contend that it is conceivable to have direct access to different personalities without hypothetically gathering their psychological states or by closely resembling induction. The Danish phenomenologist Dan Zahavi, for example, contends that ‘somewhat, the case has been that we have to take the encapsulated and naturally implanted nature of mental life truly and recognize an increasingly prompt experiential access to the psyches of others which is before and more central than any innovative projection or hypothetical deduction.

The case is ‘experienced as really present to me, in this manner making the involvement being referred to altogether different from, state, thinking that the other is disturbed, in light of the fact that the letter she has gotten has been destroyed, or construing that the individual is tanked, on the grounds that he is encompassed by twelve void jugs, or presuming that the other must be enraged in light of the fact that I would be irate on the off chance that I had been exposed to a similar treatment as he has’ (Zahavi 2011).

This sort of direct empathic (or social) recognition is a joint full of feeling/psychological undertaking. It is famously difficult to isolate one’s very own passionate response upon an episode from the immediate understanding of its significance. While getting furious about seeing an occurrence of an individual being pestered, it is difficult to isolate this passionate response upon the episode of provocation from the evaluative appraisal of the episode. This demonstrates an old exercise about passionate comprehension, that feelings likewise are psychological and evaluative in their temperament, that they are emotional decisions (Nussbaum 2001; Solomon 1988). This demonstrates the sort of direct recognition Zahavi talks about is nothing else than minor passionate cognizance. This sort of passionate discernment is the thing that empathy and empathic comprehension is about sui generis.

As expressed, it is a comprehension with joint full of feeling and psychological segments. It is tied in with relating to the next individual, just as it is about enthusiastic separation and of monitoring the otherness of the other. Subsequently, empathy is a specific sort of other-coordinated information; it is coordinated not at one’s very own advantages, however at the interests and conditions of another person. It is a reaction upon and a comprehension of someone else’s weal and misfortune. It is then not an ethically nonpartisan type of seeing, however an understanding that is concerned. We can say that it is a minding understanding.

Empathy And The Developmental

In research about empathy throughout the years, a few theoretical and philosophical patterns have been overwhelming. All things considered, the most disputable issue in bioethics about the job of empathy isn’t whether it is a specific sort of understanding, emotional or psychological, however to what degree it tends to be said to be regularizing: Is empathy only an ethically unbiased method for understanding the brains of different people or is it a specific method for comprehension and identifying with the other individual that is innately regulating? In the event that it is an ethical workforce, how might it be a method of understanding that in the meantime has sway upon good inspiration? Two issues are critical in this regard: First, if empathy, and specifically full of feeling empathy, is a wellspring of good esteem and good inspiration, in what capacity would this be able to be given a conceivable philosophical clarification? Also, would empathy be able to be normatively activity controlling? Would it be able to be the instrument from which we measure directly from wrong, or is its capacities simply epistemological, i.e., that it is focal in good observation, giving data of good importance?

That we can encounter another individual’s agony and enduring is an existential truth; it is characteristic for our human condition, so to state. What’s more, one reason for good concerns is the means by which the other’s condition copies our own comprehension and feelings. Full of feeling empathy is our substantial compassion, how someone else’s agony and enduring are reflected in our very own prompt sentiment of thoughtful concern. To feel some uneasiness and compassion as a reflection upon someone else’s torment is from numerous points of view what ethical quality is about. Thus, to contend that empathy is an ethically impartial method for understanding the psychological condition of someone else will in general disregard the significance of full of feeling empathy, how one through feeling legitimately identifies with the weal and trouble of someone else.

As such, clinician Richard Lazarus discusses hot insight rather than cold discernment (Lazarus 1989). Cold discernment is the means by which one comprehends another being’s human condition while as yet being in a segregated and unengaged state of mind. Hot insight, then again, implies that observation and comprehension is likewise viable; it is caring. Some sort of concern is so to talk inward to a certain piece of understanding the other individual’s situation. Hot and emotional cognizance is altogether different from cold discernment. For example, a visitor must be able to envision and comprehend the state of his unfortunate casualty, however he no doubt can’t identify with the state of his injured individual in a viable manner; he can’t feel emotional empathy. When saying as much, two inquiries ring a bell: What is this sort of ‘tormented mindfulness’ and for what reason is it standardizing? The other inquiry is about inspiration: Why does this sort of mindfulness or feeling emotional empathy rouse ethically? For what reason is the other’s torment motivation to support that person, and for what reason is it not only motivation to flee, to free oneself from the difficult experience, instead of raising one’s ethical still, small voice? These are precarious inquiries yet a few answers can be insinuated. One way is contend for some sort of substantive good authenticity; that to see someone else in torment and enduring is to encounter moral incentive in an immediate and prompt way (Korsgaard 1996), and that this sort of observing reflects an individual’s persuasive air. The other path is to contend in a more Levinasian way, that empathic seeing is an impression of revelations, something that springs to an individual’s quick encounter and alarms human sensitivities. The morals of Levinas illustrates how the defenselessness of the Other signifies moral duty. The focal thought in Levinas’, as we additionally can find in Husserl’s hypothesis of empathy, is that encountering the brains of different people is something that we truly can’t appreciate in the full epistemological sense. In the event that we through empathy could completely get a handle on someone else’s sentiments and aims, there would be no contrast between the other and I (Zahavi 1999). Rather it is critical to protect the possibility that to comprehend and relate to someone else is additionally in the meantime and dependably to be gone up against with that which surpasses our comprehension. A human experience is to experience something that we can’t completely appreciate. It is in this vastness of catching the other inside our intellectual plans that a morals, as indicated by Levinas, is conceivable. . Regard for contrast is urgent in morals, similarly as dread of the different as various, as the Jew or the Sunni, as poor people and the hobo, might be a wellspring of persecution and unethical behavior. Empathy influences us to comprehend the other, however the other additionally rises above our empathy. What’s more, it is in this experience with otherness, what Levinas calls alterity, that morals is conceivable. Awareness and the Ego are put into inquiry, put in a state of receptivity. It is additionally focal in the morals of Levinas that to see the other in a full of feeling enthusiastic route is in some sense to be tended to ethically, to be capable. Duty is conceivable on the grounds that its cause is a reaction. The other enchant you, in a manner of speaking, in which the Ego loses its epistemological control. Review in the accompanying how Levinas shows this in his phenomenological depictions of the Face: The first expression of the face is the ‘Thou shalt not murder’. It is a request. There is an edict in the presence of the face, as though an ace addressed me. In any case, in the meantime, the essence of the Other is down and out; it is the poor from whom I can do all and to whom I owe all (Emmanuel Levinas, 1992).

Levinas himself never utilized the word empathy, however in his investigation of moral reasonableness and the face, we can find much that helps us to remember the sort of being tended to by the enduring of somebody that we additionally find when we break down empathic affectivity/excitement. There is an idea of positive interestedness, of essential concern and compassion toward another human we meet that springs to mind in these investigations of human empathy and in the showdown with otherness we see outlined in the morals of Levinas. To relate an other-arranged movement in a most key and primordial way. However, curiously, disregarding all the diverse records of the wellsprings of normativity we find in the Kantian, in the consequentialist, and in prudence moral conventions in profound quality, we additionally find some nonexistent originations of the Good. In Kantianism it is the unequivocally Good Will; in consequentialism, it is amplification of the general Good; in Aristotelian ideals hypothesis, it is human fulfillment, and in Plato and Levinas, it is in the Good that is past being. Joining all these different originations of the wellsprings of profound quality is an essential worry for the weal and burden of others (Arne Johan Vetlesen 1994). One thinks about profound quality since one fundamentally thinks about the prosperity of different people. One thinks about equity, since equity is all at last a worry for the general human great. Empathy found in this meta-moral setting can never be an impartial epistemological movement, so to speak. Empathy is characteristically additionally thoughtful concern, some sort of sharing the human state of the other individual. A focal inquiry that pursues from this diagram of empathic normativity is the degree to which it is a widespread human limit of worry for other people. This inquiry can’t be completely tended to here, yet it suffices to state that empathy is all inclusive and primordial limit of human worry that has a critical spot in any comprehension of bioethics all around. The issue isn’t the general significance and presence of empathy and its significance in clinical bioethics. The issue is the instability of such a mien of consideration and human worry in a worldwide setting of expanding enduring, war, and neediness. It is excessively little of worldwide worry for poor people. The affluent social orders care close to nothing and it is infrequently a theme in discussions about medicinal services needs in the Western social orders.

Conclusion

Empathy is one of the focal origin of human ethical quality. Empathy is the enthusiastic personnel that gives us access to the weal and hardship of different people (Arne Johan Vetlesen, 1994). Thus, it offers access to the ethical space and is critical in good recognition. It is not necessarily the case that cognizance, information about moral standards and speculations or good and expert experience, and results from clinical research are insignificant as wellsprings of good discernment and decisions. It is just to state that empathy is essential since it gives us explanations behind concern and care for patients that are consequence of enthusiastic comprehension and association and which in the meantime express a passionate frame of mind of consideration that is irreplaceable in medicinal services. Empathy joins passionate inclusion with good creative energy and is motivationally vital on the grounds that it includes a mentality of concern and contribution that is close to home and bona fide. At long last, empathy is epistemologically significant in clinical consideration since it regularly opens up information that is pertinent for deciding the patients’ clinical conditions.