Instructions are in the PDF uploaded. Please keep in mind that this assignment s

Instructions are in the PDF uploaded. Please keep in mind that this assignment s

Instructions are in the PDF uploaded. Please keep in mind that this assignment surrounds Canadian law. You can dedicate 25 words to each statement for Task 1 (chosen topics C and D), as they seem the simplest. Scroll to the bottom of the PDF to view them. For the argumentative paragraphs, you can make them 100 words each. Which should be 250 words total, as I see 275 is the maximum per page. Feel free to summarize wherever necessary. Please cite all sources used in the research organizer I uploaded. You can send a message if any clarification is needed. Thank you very much!

Please see attachment and please follow the professor’s instructions. Also, the

Please see attachment and please follow the professor’s instructions. Also, the

Please see attachment and please follow the professor’s instructions. Also, the instructions mention sources must come from our schools online library. How can we make sure this happens? My future profession is a criminal lawyer. Some of the issues facing my future professional field are: high stakes, emotional impact, legal complexity, public perception, client communication, evidence challenges, ethical dilemmas, workload, courtroom pressure, client resources.

Rights at Trial As you’ve learned throughout this course, defendants receive num

Rights at Trial
As you’ve learned throughout this course, defendants receive num

Rights at Trial
As you’ve learned throughout this course, defendants receive numerous rights during a criminal trial. Discuss, in detail, two of those rights and explain why they are crucial to ensuring a fair trial.

1) Who were the parties 2) Who was suing whom and for what reason? What were the

1) Who were the parties
2) Who was suing whom and for what reason? What were the

1) Who were the parties
2) Who was suing whom and for what reason? What were the positions/arguments of each party?
3) What was the holding of the court that heard the case just before the Supreme Court.
4) What did the Supreme Court majority decide?
5) What did the dissent decide?
6) How would you have decided this case and what are the future implications of free speech among children in public schools?
Read the case itself to answer the questions posed. Do not use websites that summarize the case.
Your memo should be well organized. You must clearly note each question that you are responding to.
Please make sure you are not copying and pasting from your source. Most of the material should be paraphrased in your own words; verbatim quotations should make up no more than 10% of the essay. Since the purpose to is highlight and summarize key information, merely copying and pasting from the case does not accomplish this goal. Please use your own words and use quotations sparingly

Assignment: Individual research paper of approximately 15 pages and theoretical

Assignment: Individual research paper of approximately 15 pages and theoretical

Assignment: Individual research paper of approximately 15 pages and theoretical content. The font should be Times New Roman, size 12, with 1.5 line spacing. Footnotes should be in the same font, size 10,single-spaced.
The topic is Restorative Justice in Italy , because In the course of 2021, the Italian Parliament has discussed a new reform to restore the Italian penal system, which is effectively coming into force by 2022. One of the tasks of which the “Cartabia Reform” works concerns probation implementation in Italian Justice.
what is fundamental is that Restorative justice is not longer an alternative method but it is complimentary.
Here are some specific areas to explore in your research:
1.Historical development. Investigate the historical development of restorative justice principles in Italy, considering any unique historical factors that may have influenced their evolution.
2.Legal framework. Examine the current legal framework for restorative justice in Italy, analyzing recent statutes, regulations and legal changes affecting its application.
3.Case studies. Incorporate case studies highlighting successful restorative justice interventions in Italy, discussing outcomes, challenges and roles of stakeholders.
4.Comparative analysis. Compare the Italian approach to restorative justice with other European countries, identifying similarities, differences and best practices.
5. Effectiveness and challenges. To evaluate the effectiveness of restorative justice programs in Italy, citing empirical evidence on their impact on crime rates, recidivism and community satisfaction.
6. Community involvement. To explore the role of communities in the restorative justice process in Italy and how their participation contributes to the success of initiatives.
7.Cultural and social considerations. To investigate how cultural and social factors contribute to the success of restorative justice initiatives.
A case study we did at the lecture was about : restorative justice and terrorism, about ETA: Basque separatist organization in Spain that used terrorism in its campaign for an independent Basque state. It could be discussed in the essay in the part of the comparative analysis with other European Countries, as a successful outcome.
“Remorseful ETA terrorists are asking victims’ relatives to pardon them for their bloody deeds. Discreet but highly emotive meetings are now taking place between former terrorists and victims’ families. Two protagonists talk of the experience.
The initiative for the meetings came from ETA terrorists imprisoned at Nanclares de Oca. Many have had their sentences reduced for cutting ties with ETA and showing remorse for their crimes. Some prisoners have chosen to go a step further—to ask their surviving victims or their relatives to pardon them. Both sides agree to one pre-condition: no further reduction in the prisoners’ sentences
Spain’s Office for the Victims of Terrorism took a hand in putting the convicts’ initiative into effect. Txema Urkijo, who has long been involved in peace initiatives in the Basque Country, played a key role.
A team of mediation experts prepared the meetings with great care. Eleven meetings have been held to date. The former terrorists get the chance to speak to victims’ relatives and ask them for pardon whether for their own deeds or those of ETA as a whole”.

1. which criminology theory does the best job of explaining criminal behavior (f

1. which criminology theory does the best job of explaining criminal behavior (f

1. which criminology theory does the best job of explaining criminal behavior (for this paper I chose Classical)
2. Explain in detail why you think this theory does the best job of explaining criminal behavior
3. Discuss the history of the development of the theory
4. Has the theory been empirically supported? In other words, cite three studies that have tested the theory and be sure to report the findings in these studies.
5. What policies could be implemented if the theory were to influence the criminal justice system

Intro to Legal Research and Writing ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS The Alaska Admini

Intro to Legal Research and Writing
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
The Alaska Admini

Intro to Legal Research and Writing
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
The Alaska Administrative Code (A.A.C.)
The Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.)
To be filed on or before Monday, December 4
LAW DERIVED FROM
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
Three Equal Branches of American Government
As we learned early in the course, the Constitution of the United States provides us with
a “tripartite” system of government, one that exists “in three parts” or branches. Through a
series of checks and balances, each of the three branches of government is designed to carry
out a specific governing function while retaining power equal to the other two branches. This
system of government provides us with a legislative branch of government which enacts our
laws, an executive branch which enforces our laws, and a judicial branch which interprets our
laws. As each of our fifty states came into being, a similar tripartite structure was adopted for
most state governments. The same is true of most local governments. As a result, we have in
the United States three branches of government, executive, legislative and judicial, which exist
at three levels of government, federal, state and local. We obtain “law” from each of these three
equal branches.
The legislative branch of government consists of elected representatives who “enact”
law; the federal congress, the state legislatures, and the municipal assemblies or councils. We
refer to these laws as statutes or ordinances.
The judicial branch consists of the federal court system, a separate court system for
each state and the District of Columbia, and in most instances, although not in Alaska, a local
or municipal court system. This branch of government “decrees” law which we refer to as “case
law” or “common law.”
Finally, the executive branch of government consists of elected executive officers, the
President at the federal level, the Governor at the state level, and the Mayor at the municipal
level. In addition, the executive branch includes several administrative agencies, each headed
by an administrator appointed by the executive. We obtain much of our law from the
administrative agencies of the executive branch of our government. In fact, most authorities
declare that the majority of our law comes from the executive branch through the administrative
rules and regulations that are promulgated by the various administrative agencies. We generally
simply refer to this law as “regulations.” We all hear constantly from politicians that it is the
unreasonable use of regulations that adversely impacts many aspects of our day-to-day lives
and impedes the progress of our economy.
You can easily name dozens of these agencies. They are known by a variety of names:
“agency,” “commission,” “administration,” “service,” “authority,” “board,” “department, “division,”
or even “corporation.” For example, common federal agencies and their acronyms include:
Agricultural Stabilization Commission (ASC)
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF)
1

I. Relationship a. In what capacity do you know (name) b. how long have you

I. Relationship
a. In what capacity do you know (name)
b. how long have you

I. Relationship
a. In what capacity do you know (name)
b. how long have you known him?
c. Feelings for (name)
II. General statement of support
a. Do you understand the trouble (name) is in?
b have you talked with him about his trouble?
c. are you able to help him in any way? (place to live, job, other support)
III. Statement and Character
a. what good things can you say about (name)
b. mention character traits (honesty, courage, love, etc and examples)
c. offer any personal experiences or insights that may help the Judge understand (name) true character
IV. Conclusion
a. express to Judge in your own words how (name) knows he has done wrong, regrets doing what he did, and wants to go forward with his life.

1. The following presentation is intended to help you successfully complete the

1. The following presentation is intended to help you successfully complete the

1. The following presentation is intended to help you successfully complete the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) case essay assignment.
2. Choose a SCOTUS case that interests you. You may choose any case on a criminal justice process topic heard by the SCOTUS to research and write an essay about it.
Caveat – you may not write on a case you previously used in another class.
3. Research the details about the case (answer the five research questions: Who, What, When, Where and Why). Take notes about what you discover. Note the sources of your information. You must list your sources at the end of the essay in Bluebook citation format, proper footnotes in Bluebook format throughout the essay, and properly cite the sources of each piece of information in the essay itself.
4. After researching a case, organize the information you have collected by making an outline. A basic structure for organizing your information might be as follows.
A. Introduction:
1. Identify the name of the case and when it was heard before SCOTUS.
2. Identify the parties involved in the case.
3. Briefly describe the focus of the case.
B. Describe the case itself: What was the controversy in the case?
C. How did the case move through the courts before reaching SCOTUS?
1. What court had original jurisdiction in the case?
2. How had previous courts ruled in the case?
D. What did the SCOTUS rule in the case?
1. What was the argument of the majority opinion?
2. What was the argument of the minority opinion?
E. What was the reasoning used by the SCOTUS to reach its decision? How did it reach its decision?
E. Conclusion: How does the Court’s ruling in the case affect Americans today?
1. Has the Court’s ruling in the case affected other rulings in other cases?
2. Has the Court’s ruling affected the interpretation and enforcement of any particular laws, and how those laws are enforced?
3. If applicable: Has the Court’s ruling in this case affected you, or someone you know, personally?
5. Write your essay. If you organized your information based on the suggested outline, then all you have to do is write down what you have learned from your research, and put it into a footnoted two to three page essay. Your first paragraph is the introduction (the information under letter A of your outline). The second paragraph is the information under letter B, and so on.
6. Sources: Be sure to cite your sources, using sequentially numbered footnotes. That means any information you learned from another source, such as a website, a magazine article, a videotaped interview, etc., must be properly noted in your essay. Make sure you use footnotes in proper BlueBook citation style. Footnotes appear at the bottom of each page, not at the end of the document (those are endnotes).

Research the Casey Anthony case and then answer the following questions, your re

Research the Casey Anthony case and then answer the following questions, your re

Research the Casey Anthony case and then answer the following questions, your response should consist of a minimum of three paragraphs. Please provide proper citations for all references that you use to support your conclusions. Please cite at least two original works discussing this topic other than Wikipedia.
1. How was the evidence in this case impacted by the rules of evidence admissibility in court?
2. What mistakes were made during the forensic investigation of the suspects computer?
3. How could the shift from personal computers to mobile devices have greatly impacted the investigation of this case if it were to happen today?