Category: Criminal Justice

In this course you’ve read about or watched documentaries about many “high-profi

In this course you’ve read about or watched documentaries about many “high-profile” white-collar crimes. Choose ONE of these (such as Enron, Bernie Madoff, the HSBC money-laundering scandal, Theranos), and in a four paragraph, 500-word essay:
1. Paragraph one; Introduce the purpose of your essay: to provide two brief theoretical explanations for the high profile case. Also in this paragraph, provide a brief summary of the case.
2. Paragraph two: choose one of the criminological theories covered in this unit. Describe the theory very concretely, and then apply it to the case you chose.
3. Paragraph three: Choose another of the criminological theories covered in this unit. Describe the theory very concretely, and apply it to the case you chose.
4. Paragraph four: Which theory do you think best explains your case and why?
below its link to get the information about the theories

I have attached instructions please write APA 7th ed graduate doctoral format pr

I have attached instructions please write APA 7th ed graduate doctoral format pro American conservative point of view for Liberty University conservative University

Read the article by Caroline Angel and her colleagues (2014).
Then use the evalu

Read the article by Caroline Angel and her colleagues (2014).
Then use the evaluation questions from Chapter 9 and the knowledge you have gained from the chapter and from Lecture 8 to evaluate each question below on a scale of 1 to 5 or give an N/A (not applicable) or I/I (insufficient information) when applying it to the study described in Angel et al.’s (2014) article. As usual, make sure to explain your rating for each evaluation question in a couple of sentences (approx. 2.5 pages).
____ 1. If two or more groups were compared, were the participants assigned at random to the groups?
Explain:
____ 2. If two or more groups were compared, were there enough participants (or aggregate units) per group?
Explain:
____ 3. If two or more comparison groups were not formed at random, is there evidence that they were initially equal in important ways?
Explain:
____ 4. If only a single participant or a single group is used, have the treatments been alternated?
Explain:
____ 5. Are the treatments described in sufficient detail?
Explain:
____ 6. If the treatments were administered by individuals other than the researcher, were those individuals properly trained and monitored?
Explain:
____ 7. If each treatment group had a different person administering a treatment, did the researcher try to eliminate the personal effect?
Explain:
____ 8. If treatments were self-administered, did the researcher check on treatment compliance?
Explain:
____ 9. Except for differences in the treatments, were all other conditions the same in the experimental and control groups?
Explain:
____ 10. Were the effects or outcomes of treatment evaluated by individuals who were not aware of the group assignment status?
Explain:
____ 11. When appropriate, have the researchers considered possible demand characteristics?
Explain:
____ 12. Is the setting for the experiment natural?
Explain:
____ 13. Has the researcher distinguished between random selection and random assignment?
Explain:
____ 14. Has the researcher considered attrition?
Explain:
____ 15. Has the researcher used ethical and politically acceptable treatments?
Explain:
____ 16. Overall, was the experiment properly conducted?
Explain:

As you are aware, the last video clip in the Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile J

As you are aware, the last video clip in the Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice Lecture PowerPoint focuses on the “School to Prison Pipeline.” Considering this topic is a great blend of both corrections and juvenile delinquency/justice. You will answer the questions below after watching this video. For convenience, this is the link to the video clip: School to Prison Pipeline.
Consider the following questions:
What do you think are the reasons for the increase in suspensions, expulsions, and arrests of youth in U.S.? (If you are an international student, do you see this trend in your home country?)
What were the disciplinary policies in your high school? How do you think they compared to the policies in place when your parents, or your professor, were in high school?
Should children ever, in any instance, be arrested at school? If you feel they should, what situation calls for arrest? Should disorderly conduct or disruptive behavior be enough to warrant an arrest?
What training should police officers receive before they are deployed to work with children in schools?
Do you think disciplinary alternative schools are a good idea? What kinds of minimum requirements should these schools be subject to? Do they serve youth positively who are in need, or do these schools label youth negatively? What can we do to ensure that alternative education programs serve our communities and youth in need positively?
In total, your answers to the above questions should be a very healthy paragraph of 300 words, minimum.

I have attached instructions as well as the book that needs to be accessed and r

I have attached instructions as well as the book that needs to be accessed and referenced should be written APA 7th ed Graduate/Doctoral format Pro American and conservative in view Liberty University Lynchburg VA.

his assignment will have you looking in-depth into a recent EPA Environmental Cr

his assignment will have you looking in-depth into a recent EPA Environmental Crimes case using EPA data.
Step 1: Go to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Crimes Case Bulletin and choose the most recent bulletin.
Step 2: Write a 4 paragraph, 500 word essay on any of the cases that are featured for that bulletin:
Paragraph one: State the purpose of the essay, to use EPA data to describe a recent environmental crime and how federal (and possibly local) law enforcement and regulatory agencies dealt with it, and the outcome.
Paragraph two: Describe the case *PARAPHRASING*
Paragraph three: State what happened with this case from a law enforcement/regulatory perspective. Who did the investigation? Who prosecuted it, if there was a prosecution?
Paragraph four: State the outcome of that case, and reflect on the social, financial, and other harms caused by the crime. What did you think of the response and why?

Provide a summary of provided readings (no other sources) and Anwsering question

Provide a summary of provided readings (no other sources) and Anwsering question: does Death penalty help deter homicides from happening? Is it a good crime control policy?

Which model of the criminal justice process is more sustainable to you: due proc

Which model of the criminal justice process is more sustainable to you: due process or crime control? Why did you select this model? In considering the model of criminal justice that you feel to be more sustainable, how does discretion impact the CJS process, according to the model you have chosen?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a formal, written system of laws, as opposed to relying on unwritten social and cultural norms? Are the disparities inherent in the laws regarding crack-cocaine and powder cocaine a reflection of subtle racism, or are these substances so different that they pose different threats to the public safety of society?
Answers to both sets of questions should be no less than 100 words each for a total of 200 words.

Provide an answer to the following questions:
What are some of the positive and

Provide an answer to the following questions:
What are some of the positive and negative consequences of having American law enforcement fragmented among so many different jurisdictions?
What advantages or disadvantages would there be to having a national police force with centralized command, universal training standards, and common equipment, salaries, and benefits? Explain.
Answers to both sets of questions should be no less than 100 words each for a total of 200 words.

Question 1: Watch the following video on the triple murder/home invasion that oc

Question 1: Watch the following video on the triple murder/home invasion that occurred in Cheshire, CT. in 2007. Answer the following questions (at least 2-3 pages, New Times Roman 12 font, and double-spaced):
After watching the video and reflecting on what you learned about the common mistakes in death investigations, what should have been done differently?
Knowing what you know between the video and your readings so far, what would you have done differently?
Here is some additional information on the case as well. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/tv/hbos-the-cheshire-murders-explores-the-shades-of-gray-in-an-open-shut-case/2013/07/21/c086abbc-ed88-11e2-a1f9-ea873b7e0424_story.html (Links to an external site.)
Textbook source: Adcock, J. M., & Chancellor, A. S. (2016). Death investigations. James M. Adcock & Arthur S. Chancellor. P.360-407.
Question 2: You are a supervisor conducting a case review of one of your death investigators (at least 3 full paragraphs, approx. 2 pages).
Utilizing the template from pages 404-406 in your textbook, which 5 items would be of the most importance to you?
In addition to listing the 5 items, explain why each item is important.
Textbook source: Adcock, J. M., & Chancellor, A. S. (2016). Death investigations. James M. Adcock & Arthur S. Chancellor. P.360-407.
Question 3: Based upon what you’ve learned, discuss which type of evidence (physical, informational or behavioral) is the best type of evidence to help investigators investigate (approx. 200-250 words, 0.5 pages, single-spaced).
Textbook source: Adcock, J. M., & Chancellor, A. S. (2016). Death investigations. James M. Adcock & Arthur S. Chancellor. P.360-407.