Category: Criminal Justice

1. Using the NC Felony Punishment Chart:
Explain what the sentence would be for

1. Using the NC Felony Punishment Chart:
Explain what the sentence would be for two individuals convicted of Voluntary Manslaughter (Class D felony) using the provided information:
Suspect 1: No prior record and several mitigating circumstances.
Suspect 2: 18+ points and several aggravating circumstances.
What is the difference in sentencing based on the guidelines? Same exact charge, two completely different situations. Is this where we assume that people are treated unfairly in the criminal justice system and one person is given a different sentence for the same exact crime.
2. Using the NC Misdemeanor Punishment Chart:
Determine what the sentence would be for an individual being found guilty of Simple Possession of Marijuana (Class 3 – NCGS 90-95 (d)(4)) using the provided information:
Suspect 3: No prior convictions
Suspect 4: Four prior convictions
Be sure you a fully answering the questions presented and you read the statutes for the crimes provided. HINT: Sometimes the actual statute dictates what a sentence can and cannot be. I provided the class levels so there was no misunderstanding. Does this explain why individuals can be charged with the same exact crime, yet receive different punishments/sentences?
You can examine the other guidelines here and the NC Sentencing Handbook here if you would like more information.

Step 1: Review the concept of slippery slope on page 108 in the textbook. To g

Step 1: Review the concept of slippery slope on page 108 in the textbook. To get a better idea of this concept, you can also review Texas State’s Department of Philosophy explanation for a more general overview of the concept.
https://www.txst.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/Slippery-Slope.html
Step 2: Create a detailed, step-by-step scenario where/how an officer begins making the wrong choices and ends up falling down the slippery slope, ensuring to discuss how one bad decision can lead to another and another and so on (include at least 3 steps in your discussion). Also, discuss how the slippery slope in your created scenario could have been avoided.
Step 3: Post your work in the forum below. An initial post (20 available points) of at least 300 words.
NOTE:
Do NOT use previously completed work on this assignment from any other course
Because of the nature of this assignment, you should not have a TurnItIn similarity index (or it should be minuscule; any matching from references is excluded)
Proper APA citations required
Remember that late work is not accepted
Be respectful when posting any comment
Be reader-friendly by spacing between paragraphs

How is school both a risk and a protective variable/factor? What does it depend

How is school both a risk and a protective variable/factor? What does it depend on? Discuss.
USE APA FORMAT AND CITATIONS ALSO INCLUDE PAGE NUMBERS.
Use link to the textbook below as the only source
https://books.google.com/books?id=M2vABgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

Given the several examples of Juvenile justice around the world, of the countrie

Given the several examples of Juvenile justice around the world, of the countries presented, which model is best? Why? Discuss
USE TEXTBOOK FILE PROVIDED AS THE ONLY SOURCE
ALSO USE APA FORMAT AND CITATIONS ALSO INCLUDE PAGE NUMBERS

ALWAYS INCLUDE THE PROPER HEADING ON THE TITLE PAGE (REFER TO ASSIGNMENT 1 & 2)

ALWAYS INCLUDE THE PROPER HEADING ON THE TITLE PAGE (REFER TO ASSIGNMENT 1 & 2) REFER TO YOUR TEXT BOOK.
double spaced (350 words or more)
1) Discuss the Three (3) questions that must be addressed when analyzing Fourth Amendment issues.
Constitutional searches and seizures require that such events be
reasonable. What might happen if we did not have such requirements? Cite
present-day examples such as the War on Terror or contemporary
incidents of profiling. Be sure to include elements of the three-step
process.

ALWAYS INCLUDE THE PROPER HEADING ON THE TITLE PAGE (REFER TO ASSIGNMENT 1 & 2)

ALWAYS INCLUDE THE PROPER HEADING ON THE TITLE PAGE (REFER TO ASSIGNMENT 1 & 2) REFER TO YOUR TEXT BOOK
minimum-double spaced (350 word minimum)
1) Discuss the Three (3) questions that must be addressed when analyzing Fourth Amendment issues.
Constitutional searches and seizures require that such events be
reasonable. What might happen if we did not have such requirements?
Cite present-day examples such as the War on Terror or contemporary
incidents of profiling. Be sure to include elements of the three-step
process.

Reading Assignment #6
Chapters 11 & 12
Sent AI + turnitin plagiarsim report
Defi

Reading Assignment #6
Chapters 11 & 12
Sent AI + turnitin plagiarsim report
Define the following key terms: Please number your definitions and put your name on your paper and list reference(s)
If the above information above is not included points will be deducted.
Bivariate Association and Analysis
F-Ration
Chi-Square Test ‘
Grand Mean
Expected Cell Frequencies
Total Variation
Independent Variables
Within-Group Variation
Joint Distributions
Table of Column Percentages
Marginal Distributions
Table of Row Percentages
Observed Cell Frequencies
Table of Total Percentages
Write a two-page paper highlighting what you learned from reading chapters 11 & 12. The paper must be in your own words.
REQUIRED TEXT: Miethe. Terance D. Simple Statistics/Applications in Criminology and Criminal Justice Oxford University Press Publishing Company Los Angeles, CA. ISBN 9780195330717

discussion post must be written in APA 7th ed graduate/doctoral format conservat

discussion post must be written in APA 7th ed graduate/doctoral format conservative and pro American in view attached instructions and lecture notes

Answer the assigned question listed below in an organized and coherent fashion,

Answer the assigned question listed below in an organized and coherent fashion, providing as much detail and critical analysis of the issue as possible. The essay is an open book and open notes assignment.  You may also use independent sources as well as notes from class lectures; however, your textbook is the main foundation and roadmap to your answers.
 
The essay’s Spelling, grammar, and proper APA formatting is a must. A minimum of three (3) citations from the textbook citations utilizing each covered chapter and one (1) outside source are required.      
 
Elijah Anderson, Edwin Sutherland, and the notorious Ronald Akers were stranded together in an airport one evening. They gathered in the coffee shop around a table and the conversation turned quickly to a discussion of the particularly high violent crime rate in Chicago. Each individual shared how their theory explains this phenomenon. As the coffee flowed, the discussion became ever more animated. Fortunately, enough, you were also stranded in the airport, were seated at the adjacent table, and were able to overhear the entire discussion. Laptop ever at the ready, you captured the conversation. Please describe it here, to the best of your recollection.
Chapters 15, 34 , 35
References
Sutherland, E.H (1947) Differential Association In J. Jacoby, T. Severance, & A. Bruce (Eds.). Classics of criminology (4th Edition) (pp 299-301) Waveland.
Burgess, R., Akers,R(1966) A Differential Association In J. Jacoby, T.
Severance, & A. Bruce (Eds.). Classics of criminology (4th Edition) (pp 302-309) Waveland.
Anderson, E (1994) The Code of The Streets In J. Jacoby, T.
Severance, & A. Bruce (Eds.). Classics of criminology (4th Edition) (pp 130-146) Waveland.
Can you also use proper APA citation, so put the page number you got the evidence from if you take a direct quote from the book.
Also no contraction please use the full word
Example : can not not can’t
Thank you, I appreciate it

In recent years, there has been significant debate around the admissibility and

In recent years, there has been significant debate around the admissibility and use of junk science in criminal courts, with multiple recent exonerations demonstrating the negative impact of junk science and false expert testimony on the lives of innocent people. For this short paper, use the National Registry of Exonerations (here: https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspxLinks to an external site.) and select a wrongful conviction case in which unreliable science or expert testimony played a deciding role. For your chosen case, discuss the main psychological issues that you observe in the case, and at least one research-informed approach that could have been prevented these issues from arising or mitigated their impact.
Your short paper must be submitted as a Word file or PDF document. It should consist of no less than 1 double-spaced page of APA-formatted text, and include in-text citations and references to at least 5 scholarly sources (including but not limited to class readings) as well as your chosen case.
I have chose a reading and will attach.