Category: Criminal Justice

Based on what you have learned about available community resources in Wayne Coun

Based on what you have learned about available community resources in Wayne County, New York, and based on your work with Mr. Potts, prepare a report to Supervisor Rexford that identifies the community resources (these can be any combination of treatment, prevention, education, and so on) that you believe would be an appropriate referral for Mr. Potts and his family. For each community resource that you identify, address the following:
Specify 1 resource that you recommend for each family member.
What is your goal for each of the Potts family members in terms of referring them to these resources?
What impact do you foresee as each family member recovers as a result of these resources?
You should also address whether you believe this community lacks any resources for the Potts family to which you would have made a referral if it existed in this county.
Provide up to 3 scholarly sources that may include the textbook and other course materials, and cite them using APA style.

You can choose from Courts or law enforcement and choose a criminal theory that

You can choose from Courts or law enforcement and choose a criminal theory that goes with your choice. I did Paper 1 in Corrections, hence can’t use that.
During Week 8, the student will submit a paper with a 20-30 page body on one current criminal justice theory impacting one of the two previously unselected criminal justice pillars. The student will select one of the two remaining criminal justice pillars, law enforcement, courts, or corrections, select a prevailing criminal justice theory in that pillar, and explain the impact of that theory on the operations that particular pillar. The selection of the pillar and the related theory is up to the student. The student is encouraged to and recommend to reach out to the course faculty member to ensure the theory and pillar meets the criteria for this course. The faculty member is the voice to determine if the theory and pillar meet the criteria. The student should seek confirmation on this prior to submitting the graded work.
Possible projects/areas include but are not limited to:
Law Enforcement
Broken Windows
Community Policing
COMPSTAT
Crime Control
Crime Prevention
Diversity in Law Enforcement
Kansas City Patrol Experiment
Response Time
Courts
Death Penalty
Diversion
Plea Bargaining
Pretrial Release
Prosecutorial Discretion
Selection of Judges
Sentencing Guidelines
Specialty Courts
Corrections
Community Corrections
Intermediate Sanctions
Parole
Privatization
Probation
Punishment
Recidivism
Rehabilitation
Your opinion does not determine your grade. Your grade is determined by how well you support your argument utilizing the materials discussed in this program and the supporting materials you locate. What I do not want is a regurgitation of what is in a text or supporting materials. Expand on the materials, do not repeat them. Document your facts utilizing standard APA style. This paper is to be submitted to me as indicated on the Course Schedule and Grading Policy Summary Table. The paper is to be in the citation format of your program and the body of the paper is to be between 20 and 30 pages. The body of the paper does not include the title page, table of contents, appendix or references. This is to be of high quality, free of spelling and grammatical errors, and of original work. Plagiarism will be dealt with harshly. You are to title your paper by your last name. For example, a paper would be called “smith.docx” with “.docx” being the MS Word file extension. You are to submit your paper by uploading it to appropriate assignment in the course site prior to the due date as indicated in the Course Schedule and Grading Policy Summary Table.
Your paper will be structured in the following manner and consist of the following pages/sections:
Title page (not included towards page count)
Table of contents (not included towards page count)
Abstract (not included towards page count)
Introduction of theory
Discussion of current academic literature on the theory
Discussion of current application of the theory in the professional setting
Future implications
References (not included towards page count)
Appendix (if necessary and not included in page count)
For this assignment you must submit your paper to this assignment as a Word document.
Submissions will be processed by turnitin.com for originality automatically upon submission

Please check the attached document for instructions and examples.
Also check be

Please check the attached document for instructions and examples.
Also check below:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSHXb83Xtskhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_cYq256YEAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKL2pdRmwc4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-t5Ug7Mcu4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ8Vfx4721MThis sample paper (Sample Research Proposal Paper) is just for your reference. Any use of the paper’s content will be flagged by the SafeAssign check. You may check the references used in the paper for your paper, also cite in your paper, and put in your references.Although the components (research proposal sections) can be duplicated in your paper, they may have to be adjusted for your specific needs on the selected topic. Your reviewed studies could be great samples for your papers too except that their research results will not be in yours (the proposal is a plan, your study is not executed yet). Nevertheless, you should have a session on

how well do these documents really
address the current challenges we face within

how well do these documents really
address the current challenges we face within homeland security and emergency management?
Describe some examples.
Does the HSAC’s goals and recommendations posture the Department to adequately address
the challenges presented in the present day?
Does the guidance provided in the HS strategy for 2020-2024 give the necessary focus to DHS
and its subordinate organizations to deal with the threats and issues we have covered in this
model? Why? Or Why not?
Even though these documents are primarily intended for DHS and components, do they provide
influence for state and local agencies as well? How? What about the private sector? Give some
examples.
Finally, is there anything missing that should have been included?

Reference information from the provided resource for each question (no other ref

Reference information from the provided resource for each question (no other reference is needed)
Pages 1 through page 39 – Daigle, L. E. (2017). Victimology: A Text/Reader (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. (US). https://reader2.yuzu.com/books/9781506345222
Answer discussion questions 1-5 at the end of Section 1.
Compare and contrast victim precipitation, victim facilitation, and victim provocation.
Why do you think the first explorations into victimization in terms of explaining why people are victimized centered not on offender behavior but on victim behavior?
What are the reasons behind labeling crimes as acts against the state rather than against victims?
How does the victims’ rights movement correspond to the treatment of offenders and rights afforded to offenders?
Does examining victim behavior when attempting to identify causes of victimization lead to victim blaming? Is it wrong to consider the role of the victim?
Answer discussion questions 1-4 at the end of Section 2.
1.Compare and contrast the UCR and the NCVS. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? Which is the best measure of victimization?
2. Apply the concepts of routine activities and lifestyles theories to evaluate your own risk of being victimized. What could you change to reduce your risk?
3. What are the individual-level factors that place people at risk of being crime victims? What are the structural factors and social process factors that place individuals at risk of being crime victims?
4. How should the criminal justice system handle victimized individuals who may also have been involved in a crime? Do you believe in the idea of truly innocent victims? If so, should they be treated differently?

Paper 1 – Due on/by Sunday of Week 4
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This

Paper 1 – Due on/by Sunday of Week 4
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin™
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
Instructions
During Week 4, the student will submit a paper with a 20-30 page body on one current criminal justice theory impacting one of the three criminal justice pillar. The student will select one of the three criminal justice pillars, law enforcement, courts, or corrections, select a prevailing criminal justice theory in that pillar, and explain the impact of that theory on the operations of that particular pillar. The selection of the pillar and the related theory is up to the student. The student is encouraged to and recommend to reach out to the course faculty member to ensure the theory and pillar meets the criteria for this course. The faculty member is the voice to determine if the theory and pillar meet the criteria. The student should seek confirmation on this prior to submitting the graded work.
Possible projects/areas include but are not limited to:
Law Enforcement
Broken Windows
Community Policing
COMPSTAT
Crime Control
Crime Prevention
Diversity in Law Enforcement
Kansas City Patrol Experiment
Response Time
Courts
Death Penalty
Diversion
Plea Bargaining
Pretrial Release
Prosecutorial Discretion
Selection of Judges
Sentencing Guidelines
Specialty Courts
Corrections
Community Corrections
Intermediate Sanctions
Parole
Privatization
Probation
Punishment
Recidivism
Rehabilitation
Your opinion does not determine your grade. Your grade is determined by how well you support your argument utilizing the materials discussed in this program and the supporting materials you locate. What I do not want is a regurgitation of what is in a text or supporting materials. Expand on the materials, do not repeat them. Document your facts utilizing standard APA style. This paper is to be submitted to me as indicated on the Course Schedule and Grading Policy Summary Table. The paper is to be in the citation format of your program and the body of the paper is to be between 20 and 30 pages. The body of the paper does not include the title page, table of contents, appendix or references. This is to be of high quality, free of spelling and grammatical errors, and of original work. Plagiarism will be dealt with harshly. You are to title your paper by your last name. For example, a paper would be called “smith.docx” with “.docx” being the MS Word file extension. You are to submit your paper by uploading it to appropriate assignment in the course site prior to the due date as indicated in the Course Schedule and Grading Policy Summary Table.
Your paper will be structured in the following manner and consist of the following pages/sections:
Title page (not included towards page count)
Table of contents (not included towards page count)
Abstract (not included towards page count)
Introduction of theory
Discussion of current academic literature on the theory
Discussion of current application of the theory in the professional setting
Future implications
References (not included towards page count)
Appendix (if necessary and not included in page count)
For this assignment you must submit your paper to this assignment as a Word document.
Submissions will be processed by turnitin.com for originality automatically upon submission.
Papers will be graded based on this Criteria:
Quality of Response
No Response
Poor/Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, punctuation, spelling errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform with size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12′ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

A convenience store is robbed by a white male approximately 21 years old who was

A convenience store is robbed by a white male approximately 21 years old who was wearing a Liberty University baseball cap and t-shirt. The victim cashier’s descriiption is consistent with the store’s poor quality security camera image. The store’s security camera image does not add or detract anything from the victim’s statement.
Two days after the robbery, a local police officer observed a vehicle in the vicinity of the convenience store which displayed a Liberty University student parking sticker. The officer stopped the vehicle and asked the student to produce a driver’s license. The student’s physical descriiption and clothing matched that of the robber. The student claimed that he was shooting “hoops” alone on Liberty University’s campus at the time of the robbery. After identifying the driver as John Smith, the patrol officer released the driver. A photograph of John Smith was obtained and entered into a photo array that was shown to the victim cashier. The victim cashier identified Smith as the robber.
Solely based on the fact pattern of this fictional incident, please provide an answer and an explanation of your answer to the following question. Your answer must not incorporate any additional information to the fact pattern, but it may incorporate references to case law. Do you believe law enforcement has probable cause to obtain an arrest warrant for Smith? Integrate a Christian worldview perspective to support your discussion.

Discuss the main objectives of the criminal justice system, focusing on the role

Discuss the main objectives of the criminal justice system, focusing on the roles and functions of its three core components: law enforcement, the judiciary, and corrections. How do these components work together to achieve the system’s goals? Consider aspects such as maintaining public order, protecting individual rights, deterring crime, and rehabilitating offenders. Provide examples to illustrate the interaction between these components and their impact on society.

An organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, challenges, and threats

An organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, challenges, and threats (SWOC/T) must be identified at the beginning of the strategic planning process.  
You are part of a team of external criminal justice professionals who are tasked with conducting a SWOC/T environmental assessment for a city/organization that has been the subject of budget cuts and/or a defund the police movement, which reduces their overall operating budget by 10%. The contracting organization’s governing board would like a professional environmental and climate assessment report to gauge the impact these budget cuts would have on the organization. They also want to understand how the strategic planning process would be utilized to accommodate these changes.  
Review the following examples: Conduct an Environmental Scan and Conduct a SWOT Analysis to assist you with conducting your SWOC/T assessment. 
Select a security or criminal justice organization that has been the subject of recent budget cuts or police defunding in your state.  
Conduct a SWOC/T assessment that includes the following: 
Strengths of the organization  
Weaknesses of the organization 
Opportunities available to the organization 
Challenges and threats to the organization 
Conclusions drawn from the result of the SWOC/T assessment  
Develop a 700- to1,050-word executive summary of the SWOC/T assessment. Include a strategic approach to report on the budget issues. Be sure to address how the strategic planning process will incorporate the SWOC/T assessment to analyze this situation, aid in decision-making, and allocate resources moving forward.
Cite at least 3 outside references to support your assignment.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

Using
the references
Text: Dantzker, W., Hunter, R.D., & Quinn, S.T.
(2018). Res

Using
the references
Text: Dantzker, W., Hunter, R.D., & Quinn, S.T.
(2018). Research methods for criminology and criminal justice (4th ed.). Jones &
Bartlett Press.
Chapters 5 and 6 pp.67-91. 
Video:
Man vs Machine Learning:  Criminal Justice in the 21st Century
Answer
the following questions:
How do you believe policy
decisions have impacted the field of criminal justice?
How can research improve policy
decisions and impact crime, criminal justice, or corrections?
Based upon the video, what would
you change to improve the field of criminal justice and policy making?
Do you believe that a gap between
academic research and practice in the field exists? If so, explain your
thoughts on how we can bridge this gap.