Category: Criminal homework help

 
The author discusses the use of cyber-terrorism and the potential effects on A

 
The author discusses the use of cyber-terrorism and the potential effects on American society. What are some potential counterterrorist policy strategies that could assist in the prevention of cyber-terrorism?
Do you believe that any intervention could potentially increase or decrease the number of suicide attacks? What makes women as suicide bombers so unnerving to society?
 Tactics and Force Multipliers While the term terrorism is difficult to define, the process of terrorism is not. Terrorism is simply a way of fighting, In fact, Max Boot (2013) advances the argument that guerilla warfare and terrorism dominate the history of warfare. Conventional war, he concludes, is not the normative method of fighting. Terrorists fight in the shadows, and security forces must be prepared to operate in that environment. Brian Jenkins (1984, 2004a, 2004b) says that there are six tactics of terrorism: bomb-ing, hijacking, arson, assault, kidnapping, and hostage-taking. Recently, the arsenal of terrorism has grown to include threats from weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but the public does not clearly understand these threats. Technology has also modified bombing to include virtual attacks through computer systems (B. Jenkins, 1987; Brackett, 1996, p. 45; J. White, 1986, 2000; Parachini, 2003). Jenkins says that the six tactics can be enhanced by force multipliers. In military terms, a force multiplier increases striking power without increasing the strength of a unit. Terrorists routinely use force multipliers because they add to their aura. All political terrorists want to give the illusion that they can fight on a higher, more powerful level. Four force multipliers give terrorists more striking power (see the following feature titled “Another Perspective: Force Multipliers”). Researchers have known for many years that technology can enhance a terrorist group’s ability to strike (see Ketcham and McGeorge, 1986, pp. 25-33; Bunker, 1998; Linstone, 2003; Brookbank, 2006; Wright, 2008). Cyberterrorism and potential WMD attacks are examples of technological force multipli-ers. Daniel Benjamin and Steven Simon (2002, pp. 365-382) demonstrate that media coverage and interpretation of terrorist events often serve as force multipliers. One incident can be converted into a “campaign” as electronic media scramble to break the latest news. The growth of religious fanaticism introduced the force multiplier of suicide attacks into Hippel, 2002; Stern, 2003b). the arsenals of terrorism (B. Hoffman 1995; Laqueur, 1999; Juergensmeyer, 1988, 2003; von Although terrorist tactics change over time, the most common weapon of terrorism has been and is still the bomb. In 1848, anarchists talked about the philosophy of the bomb, meaning that the only way to communicate with the social order was to destroy it. Terrorists tend to increase their effectiveness in bombing by applying improved explosive technology to their weapons just as conventional military forces constantly 

QUESTION:  
From the options listed, which one do you think is the most importan

QUESTION:  
From the options listed, which one do you think is the most important in terms of recruitment and police practice:
Higher educational requirements
Increased diversity (minorities, women, etc.)
Expanded background checks with a greater emphasis on psychological screening
JESUS RESPONSE: Recruitment should be looking more into expanding background checks with a greater emphasis on psychological screening. Anybody could get a degree if they applied themselves but not everyone has good mental health. Law enforcement officers are trusted to enforce the law but they are also trusted that they won’t abuse their authority. ” Generally, departments place emphasis on the background investigation because an intensive background investigation can help to ensure agencies recruit only the most qualified individuals and also can indicate an applicant’s competency, motivation, and personal ethics. ” David Decico (December 2000). You do need education so you know know the ins and outs of your craft and yes an increased diversity is also good so that minorities can relate to the victims more. However without a good mental health the policeman would either burn out fast or would make a costly error that would bring bad publicity to that precinct. How are the policeman supposed to protect and serve their communities and when they can’t even protect and serve themselves. 
ANSWER QUESTION: WHY DO YOU DISAGREE TO JESUS? 
REFERENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER 

STEPHANE RESPONSE: When discussing a police department’s organizational structur

STEPHANE RESPONSE: When discussing a police department’s organizational structure and functions, they are both critical components of one another. If there are changes to a police department’s structure, it can also alter the organizational function. In considering factors such as relations in minority communities, it is necessary to make changes to the structure of these organizations. When considering the needs of constituents, only considering one approach in every instance will not always deliver a considerable outcome.  
There are instances when minority communities have not felt safe in their own neighborhoods because of the social climate around the world, implementing community policing, department diversity, and specialized community units will help them to foster a better relationship with law enforcement. Increasing diversity within police departments will also increase the effectiveness of police community relations because to give communities more space to be receptive of the officers in their communities, it would be easier when they see someone that looks like them. 
 Implementing bias training within departments will increase the known biases that occur within the police force that impact the communities. Learning and understanding that biases occur within the station and in the field will aid in the department’s growth. According to statistics, 58% of Americans believe that policing does need changes in to make policing better. 88% (almost 9/10) of Black Americans state that major changes are needed compared to 63% in Hispanic Americans and 51% in White Americans (Crabtree, 2020). Cultivating changes within the structure of police departments are necessary for fostering better relationships within and out of the department.  
WHY DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH STEPHANE? USE REFERENCE TO SUPPORT ANSWER 

In this assignment, you’ll explore the qualitative methods that could be used to

In this assignment, you’ll explore the qualitative methods that could be used to collect data in your area of research. On the basis of your exploration, respond to the following points:
Explain the observations that you would conduct to collect data and discuss what you would expect to learn through these observations.
If surveys or interviews would be appropriate, describe how you would proceed and what you would expect to learn.

Week 5 Project: Program or Policy Initiation Plan
The seventh stage of planned c

Week 5 Project: Program or Policy Initiation Plan
The seventh stage of planned change—Initiating the Program or Policy Plan—focuses on weaknesses of the first six stages of planned change. It is critical for the planner to review the first six stages in order to ensure a greater chance of success.
This week you will prepare a report in Microsoft Word reviewing the implementation of your program or policy. You will then evaluate outcomes. This report is to be presented to an audience that includes members of the Center for Justice, the Mayor of Fictionland, and the Chief of Police. The report should include the following elements:
Compilation of previous steps, with additional detail:
A summary of the program or policy, including a detailed action plan.
A list of two potential sources contributing to the problem. Also argue why you believe these factors are responsible for the community-police problem(s) in Fictionland.
Tools used to conduct an outcome evaluation.
Create two measures to evaluate the effectiveness of your program or policy for every objective.

The National Drug Control Policy
The White House Office of National Drug Control

The National Drug Control Policy
The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), a component of the Executive Office of the President of the United States, was established in 1988 by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act. ONDCP’s stated goal is to establish policies, priorities, and objectives to eradicate illicit drug use, manufacturing, trafficking, drug-related crime and violence, and drug-related health consequences in the U.S.
Review the most recent National Drug Control Strategy. The 2015 strategy can be viewed here.
https://myclasses.southuniversity.edu/content/enforced/109947-17124485/2015_national_drug_control_strategy.pdf
Are there any problems with ONDCP’s goals or objectives? Why?
How do these goals and objectives match up against the criteria we examined?
Are there any forces that you think will ultimately hinder the ONDCP’s ability to achieve its stated goals and objectives? Why?
Describe how you would measure outcomes for this strategy, if you were in charge of planning.
Cite any sources using APA format on a separate page using APA guidelines.

Final Introduction and Background Sections
In this assignment, you will incorpor

Final Introduction and Background Sections
In this assignment, you will incorporate the feedback that you have received week1 till now and submit revised, final versions of your introduction and background sections of your report. Your submission should be a clean, updated version that will be included in your compiled final project.
Cite all sources using APA format on a separate page.

 
Using a minimum of  350 words and a maximum of 550, answer the following quest

 
Using a minimum of  350 words and a maximum of 550, answer the following questions:
In 1996 the U.S. Congress passed the Female Genital Mutilation Act, which, among other things, criminalizes circumcision of females under 18, requires federal health agencies to educate immigrants on health risks, and impose economic sanctions on countries that fail to take steps to prevent practices.  
While many Americans are in agreement with the law, do you believe a country has the right to impose sanctions on another country for practicing a religious belief? Why or why not? And, at what point is intervention from perhaps another country or the United Nations warranted? Finally, do you believe it is possible to balance the sometimes competing interests between religious legal tradition and the pressures posed by modernization? Please provide examples to support your assertions!

Assignment #1
Part 1: Negligence
Kyle is trying to catch a plane at Denver Inter

Assignment #1
Part 1: Negligence
Kyle is trying to catch a plane at Denver International Airport. He knows that he is late for his plane; therefore, he is running through the airport as fast as possible. Unfortunately, Kyle does not see the banana peel that is lying on the floor in the middle of the concourse. He slips on the banana peel and goes sliding across the floor until he bangs her head on a metal counter and suffers a severe head injury.
Kyle files a negligence lawsuit against the Airport, which, we will assume, is in charge of maintaining the concourse. A subsequent investigation reveals that the banana peel was brownish when Kyle slipped on it. Kyle, of course, has no idea where the peel came from and why it ended up where it did.
Find one Colorodo case and cite it to provide the required elements of negligence. 
Please answer the following questions in one to two paragraphs each. For this part you do not need to use case law. You merely need to use the Courseware and your knowledge of negligence law.
1) What are the elements of negligence and how to they apply to Kyle’s lawsuit against the airport. In other words, what would Kyle be expected to show to be able to win the case?
2) Of what legal significance is it that the banana peel is brown? How does that change the determination of whether the elements of negligence are met?
3) All things considered, do you think Kyle will win the case? Explain why or why not.
Part 2: Trespass 
Dewey, Heuy and Louis are teenagers out for a walk on Central Avenue when they spot a bright and inviting Christmas display on the Morton’s property. Without meaning to damage anything, they decide to walk across the lawn to get a closer look.
Unknown to them, there is a faulty electrical connection on one of the mini twinkle lights. Mr. Morton had intended to repair the wiring but he didn’t get around to it before installing the display. In addition, there are a few groundhog holes on the front lawn that Mr. Morton knows about but never worried about because he knows where each one is.
As the three teens stealthily creep across the yard toward the lit up decorations, Dewey steps right into a groundhog hole, twists his ankle and falls with a howl right into the tree with the shorted wire, causing him to get a shock on his arm and shorting out all the decorations on that circuit.
Dewey sues Mr. Morton for negligence.
Please answer the following questions in approximately one paragraph each based on the courseware and what you learned in class. There is no need to research or use case law to answer these questions.
1) For purposes of liability of land occupiers, what class of entrants could Dewey be considered part of? What are the rights of this class of entrants? Be sure to include all possible options. 
2) What special rule or doctrine could potentially lead to Mr. Morton’s liability to Dewey?
3) All things considered, do you think Mr. Morton will be liable? Why or why not?
4) If Mr. Morton sues Dewey for trespass to chattel, would Dewey be held liable? Explain.

Using a minimum of  350 words and a maximum of 550, answer the following questio

Using a minimum of  350 words and a maximum of 550, answer the following questions:
In 1996 the U.S. Congress passed the Female Genital Mutilation Act, which, among other things, criminalizes circumcision of females under 18, requires federal health agencies to educate immigrants on health risks, and impose economic sanctions on countries that fail to take steps to prevent practices.  
While many Americans are in agreement with the law, do you believe a country has the right to impose sanctions on another country for practicing a religious belief? Why or why not? And, at what point is intervention from perhaps another country or the United Nations warranted? Finally, do you believe it is possible to balance the sometimes competing interests between religious legal tradition and the pressures posed by modernization? Please provide examples to support your assertions!