The Correlation Of Racism And Discrimination

Racism is something that has been fought for many decades in the past and many more to come. A couple hundred years ago many pilgrims made their way to the America to escape racism and start practicing their own ways without any consequences. Years later the same racism that these pilgrims faced back in Europe followed them to the America. Even when we believe that there is not much of a racism conflict in society. However due to terrorism, racism, and discrimination there still is a presence of racism. Therefore, racism still exists in the status quo. First we need to analyze what is racism, what effects it has on people, and finally how to solve racism.

Racism can be described in many different ways, although it is described as superiority over other races, which leads to discrimination and prejudice towards other race or ethnicities. Overall it displays superiority vs. inferiority scenarios. Many American children are affected by institutional racism, education is their best hope. As Asa Hillard III stated “In order for Americans to embrace diversity, the conscious and unconscious expressions of racism within our society must be identified and done away with. The first step is to develop an understanding of the history and nature of racism and its relationship to prejudice and discrimination.” We need to understand that racism is belief and discrimination is an action taken upon by certain individuals. Despite the grave importance of educational equity in our changing society, low-income minority groups have lost ground and are in imminent danger of losing a great deal more. Many minority individuals are losing a lot of rights in the United States due to the color of their skin or the way they look. Asa Hillard III also stated “The problem of racism demands the attention of all educators. As American society rapidly grows more diverse, we must give top priority to insuring that all students receive their birthright of educational equity. Unfortunately, although America is a multicultural society, “it is not yet a pluralistic society – a place where all racial and cultural groups share equal access to opportunities for quality lives and power over their own lives.” To achieve pluralism, racism must be abolished, and the mission of public education must be fully achieved. That mission is to provide all students with a high-quality education that will enable them to function successfully in an interdependent, multiethnic, multicultural, and rapidly changing world. The magnitude of the task is so great that it constitutes the most significant challenge to America’s system of education. VALUING DIVERSITY Octavio Paz reminds us that “life is plurality, death is uniformity. Every view that becomes extinct, every culture that disappears, diminishes a possibility of life.” When education takes place, every individual – teacher, student, or administrator – brings his or her cultural background to that process. Unless we educators learn to prize and value differences and to view them as resources for learning, neither whites nor minority groups will experience the teaching and learning situations best suited to prepare them to live effectively in a world whose population is characterized by diversity. Many American children are affected by institutional racism. Education is their best hope for breaking racism’s chains. Yet, although such issues as equal opportunity, desegregation, and inequities in educational achievement have received considerable attention in recent years, very few schools have developed deliberate and systematic programs to reduce prejudice. The prevailing attitude seems to be that society has done away with the problem of racism through legislative action and PHI DELTA KAPPAN, April 1990 special programs. But continuing instances of overt racism belie this notion, and institutionalized manifestations of racism – less blatant and thus more insidious – continue to stunt the aspirations and talents of minority children and distort the views and psyches of white children.” Asa Hillard III is a philosopher on the theory of racism. So far all his theories indicate that racism is only making the United States a more corrupted nation.

Racism of all things affects people the most. As adults in the world we all know by now that actions will hurt a person but words can lead to genocides, suicides, wars, etc. An example we can look towards is the Muslims as Asa Hillard states “The Mayor is right to oppose Islamophobia. Muslims should be defended against prejudice and scapegoating. Terrorist outrages, such as 9/11 in New York and 7/7 in London, are no justification for the backlash we often witness against innocent, entirely blameless, Muslims. It is undeniable that Muslims people are some of the most disadvantaged in Britain, with disproportionate numbers living in poor housing and without jobs. Globally, many Muslims suffer grave injustices – including the Israeli occupation of Palestine and the US and UK occupation of Iraq. In countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh, millions of Muslims lack safe, clean drinking water and face every day hunger. These injustices do not, however, justify the Mayor of London’s collusion with authoritarian, homophobic and sexist Islamists like Qaradawi. In the past few weeks, both Russia and the United States have escalated their military campaigns against the Islamic State. As the brutal jihadist group continues to wreak havoc in Syria and Iraq, Foreign Policy’s Peace Channel, a partnership with the United States Institute of Peace, asked United States Institute of Peace acting Vice President Manal Omar, one of the foremost voices on peace and Islam, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, author of Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now, to debate what is behind this newest breed of extremism, and how can it be defeated. In the age of al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and Boko Haram, is there a link between the violence these groups perpetrate and the faith they profess?” The Muslims in this case are entirely blameless but due to the actions of a few it leads to a lot of prejudice towards the Muslims.

Finally the question comes down to “what can we do?” We all know that racism is never going to be solved or stopped just by telling people stop. Many people wonder “so what’s the point of talking about it?” On an average an American child spends approximately 12 years of their lives in school excluding college starting at the age of 5. Since a young age these children spend more of their time at school than awake at home, and due to all the excess amount of time spent at home they eventually come in face with racism. We are trying to make the future better for our grandchildren to come and the only way to do that is to teach them on how to not take actions towards racism. If a required class for students were to be cultural education and students understand each other there no longer will be a misunderstanding of each other rather a place of peace and harmony. As Frank B. Wilderson III says “Burn down society and start all over again only then racism won’t be prominent.” Obviously for him to be saying that the only feasible solution was to burn down society implies that racism has reached its brink. As Calvin L. Warren stated “Racism only further classifies us as a dull state.” Soon enough this racism will lead to all of us feeling worthless and no need to be here a sense of being unwanted.

Ultimately, we know that there is no specific solvency for racism but if we educate our future then there should be not as much conflict in the status quo. Eventually we will have a society where our biggest problem hasn’t been fought for many decades. Many philosophers have different viewpoints on how they portray racism but at the end of the day it is always a belittlement of the way a person looks or their race/ethnicity. We have analyzed what racism is, what effects it has, and finally how to solve it. Overall racism is just something that needs to be worked out by the citizens in the status quo and the only way to do that is to communicate.

The Correlation Of Religion And Happiness

Abstract

This literature review looks at why religious individuals are happier than non-religious individuals and explores the mechanisms that are involved in the process.

Introduction

Happiness or subjective well being (SWB) can be defined as an overall increased satisfaction with life due to an abundance of positive life experiences an individual has while minimizing negative ones (Diener, 2013; Ryan & Deci, 2001; Lyubomirsky et al., 2005). Factors such as income, employment, marital status, education and social networks all add to one’s SWB as does religion. (Green & Elliot, 2009; Rizvi & Hossain, 2016).

Numerous studies have demonstrated and have identified religion as having a positive effect on SWB regardless of these factors (Arghababaei & Blachnio, 2014; Green & Elliot, 2009). Religion has also been found to have a positive effect on psychological well being and overall health for the estimated 84% of the world population who are religious (Religion Statistics and Information, 2020; Azar 2010; Green & Elliot, 2009; Snoep, 2007; Mochon & Areily, 2010).

This literature review will look at why religious individuals are happier than non-religious individuals and will explore the mechanisms involved in the process.

Literature Review

Much of the research conducted has been captured using self reporting questionnaires via the World Values Surveys, Gallup World Poll and National Opinion Research and Religious Orientations Scales to poll participants about their current life satisfaction, how often religious services are attended, individual prayer habits and how important God/Gods are in the lives of individuals, mental and physical health (Lun & Bond, 2013; Denier et. al., 2011; Rizvi & Hossain, 2016). Religious practice has been positively correlated with having purpose in life, a strong social support network of like minded individuals and better physical and mental health which in turn increases one’s SWB and overall quality of life (Aghababaei & Blachnio, 2014; Denier et. al., 2011; Rizvi & Hossain, 2016; Stavrova et al., 2013).

Religion and social support

Denier et, al., (2011) study of 455,104 participants concluded that religious social support helps to increase SWB. There is a commonality in religious support networks in which shared activities as well as morals and ethics are upheld and valued (Rizvi & Hossain, 2016).

Lim & Putnam (2010), further echo this with a research with 3,108 adults and concluded that church participation and friendships created in religious congregations do increase life satisfaction because of the sense of belonging that is formed when participating in mutually enjoyed religious services. These bonds created help to improve well being for individuals due to the connectedness of attending frequent church services or meaningful congregational activities like bible study groups (Lim & Putnam, 2010). Having such a supportive network and being an active congregational member aids in the formation of one’s social identities thereby increasing one’s SWB and life satisfaction (Stravovra et al., 2013).

Religion and eudaimonic happiness

Another reason why church goers are happier can be linked to the fact that religion gives purpose and meaning to one’s life thereby providing edudainomic happiness (Aghababaei & Błachnio, 2014; Denier et, al., 2011). Eudaimonic happiness is developed by following one’s purpose in life and living according to one’s true virtues. Religion

Religion and coping via prayer

Religion seems to have positive impacts on health by those who practice it.

Our happiness impacts our physical health. Increased happiness has been found individuals who observe and practice religious activities.

Conclusion

Although religion plays a significant role in the lives of those who practice it, further research is needed to find out if religion actually makes people happy or if happy people are just simply more open to believing in religious theologies. (Graham & Crown, 2014). Furthermore, there are limitations to this study as there is a need for cross-cultural studies since current research is primarily focused on Europe and the United States as well on the main religions (e.g., Christians, Muslims, etc.). (Arghababaei & Blavhrio, 2014). Additionally, each of the major religions, like Catholicism, have different sects or branches in different regions of a country which is not distinguished in any of the literatures, thus cross cultural studies are needed to further analyze this hypothesis.

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning and Two-Spirit (LGBTQ2S+) communities are not clearly reflected, compare or studied in terms of their religiosity and happiness. Considering that religious institutions continue to be conservative in their beliefs, how happy are their LGBTQS+ religious members? This is an area that requires inspection.

Lastly, data used in all the studies reviewed was cross sectional in nature. Snapshot answers were produced via self reporting questionnaires of their feelings on happiness and religion at the time. Longitudinal studies are needed to observe if happiness in religious individuals lasts over long period of time using the same variables.

Based on the literature reviewed, religion does correlate to SWB, physical and psychological well being which supports the notion that religious individuals are happier than non-religious individuals (Snoep, 2007).

The Correlation between Freedom and the Blues

The fifties and sixties of the United States were a time of prosperity and peace for most Americans. Living a carefree life without fear or worry. Booming economy, raising families, flashy cars, nice clothes, night clubs, and music. Doo-wop, swing, and rock and roll flooded the airwaves in homes, restaurants, cars, and clubs. Music was everywhere.

The post-World War II America in most Americans memories was a happy time. However, there are those that were forgotten, left in the shadows of Americas perfect mask that would remember that time very differently. For them, it was a time of Jim Crow laws, hatred, fear, abuse, segregated and substandard education or no education at all. Ridiculed and harassed for being black. Segregated and often times beaten or killed because of blind hate. With everything stacked against them, they never lost hope. Faith that one day things would change, for them and their future generations, it gave them the strength to stand up as one people and created the greatest movement our nation has ever seen.

However, it was not without troubles and tragedies. It was a time of suffering and hurt, setbacks, failures, and red tape, physically and emotionally painful. Those that were forgotten took their pain and suffering and molded it into something profoundly beautiful; the Blues.

Music, particularly the blues was the great unifier and main motivation of the movement and everyone marching behind it. It gave them hope for a better future. It gave them something to stand behind, a shield from the hurt, a weapon of their own making. Blues was what they clung to because it was the only thing they had left, everything else had been withheld by malic or taken by law.

The blues at that times was anything but mainstream music. It had a particular following and received almost zero airplay. Played in homes, segregated bars and street corners. It is what we would call “underground music” today. The blues had deep roots in the south, tracing all the way back to slavery and sharecropping times. The blues mostly spoke of pain and suffering, heartache, lost love, or hope, despite the suffering. Martin Luther King Jr. said that “The blues tell the story of life’s difficulties — and, if you think for a moment, you realize that they take the hardest realities of life and put them into music, only to come out with some new hope or sense of triumph. This is triumphant music.” (Kristy Houle) (Martin Luther King Speech at 1964 Berlin Jazz Festival).

I think this is the reason the blues had such an impact on the Civil Rights Movement. It was their anthem, written about them, and sung by them. It reached them on a level no other genre at the time possibly could. “The music served as a source of empowerment for those who shared similar sentiments with those performing it.” (Kristy Houle) It motivated them because it was their life, sang to a backdrop of harmonicas and guitars. It was their music. Their wants and wishes, struggles and heartache, finally sung aloud for all to hear. This alone must have been liberating after being silenced for so long. The suffering in the blues was very real to them, they had lived it first-hand. I believe this is how the blues inspired the masses to stand up and demand equality. Having lived through the worst that America had to offer at the time, the fight took on a slow and deliberate but peaceful tempo, much like the music that motivated the people to stand up for their freedom.

When broken down into its simplest form and traced back to its origin, it is easy to understand why the blues had such an impact on the Civil Rights Movement. It was a method of unification and communication that had been used for many generations who had come to pass. “Its inventors were slaves, ex-slaves and the descendants of slaves—African-American sharecroppers who sang as they toiled in the cotton and vegetable fields.” (Kopp) Music was a way of lifting spirits in the worst of conditions. Transporting them mentally to a more desirable place and time. Some of the chants that gave birth to the blues spoke of suffrage, loss, justified anger, revenge or escape if no one was listening. For the most part however, they spoke of hope, change, love, faith and the simple desire to be free and seen as equal. I think it gave a sense of belonging in a country that had rejected them completely. Repetitive chants and simple verses kept their minds at ease and allowed a way of checking on each other without disrupting their work. It’s generally accepted that the music evolved from African spirituals, African chants, work songs, field hollers, rural fife and drum music, revivalist hymns, and country dance music.” (Kopp)

The building blocks of the blues stood the test of time. Speaking of hope even though they had no indication things would change in their favor. It remained simple and repetitive with clear messages that were easy to follow and repeat, allowing that message to be carried across great distances. Supporters of the movement, both black and white, could easily remember and redistribute the message to those willing and unwilling to listen. These catchy hooks and verses burned into the mind. It made people remember even when they weren’t supportive of the cause. Having clear, cohesive messages sung amongst the masses of protesters instead of angry shouting and destructive behavior was a message all on its own. It is all too easy to feel justified fighting violence with violence. Bringing violence to a peaceful protest full of people singing blues and gospel shows the level of evil they were truly up against. It showed they were unified and steadfast in their wishes while keeping in tune with the morals and compassion those fighting against them had lost sight of a long time ago. It made people look at themselves in a new light, a source of oppression, especially through enaction. Guilt is a powerful emotion, powerful enough to bring people side by side and march for the same cause. To try to reverse laws that were put in place by their own race. It empowered the white population to pull their head out of the sand and see what was really happening in their own backyards.

Not all Blues men and women followed Reverend Martin Luther King Jrs teachings of peace and acceptance. Nina Simon saw the darker side of a systematically racist society from an early age. Watching her own parents be moved to the back of a church at her very first classical piano recital to make room for white people at the tender age of twelve. Unknowingly lighting a fire in her that wouldn’t soon be extinguished. She refused to continue until they were given back their seats. This gave her the first taste of being a civil rights activist, change doesn’t happen unless someone steps up to the plate.

Earning her fame quicker than most, she was subjected to publicity and performances most of her life. She learned to use this platform and her music as a form of protest all its own. “The power of music to incite and encourage social change is a concept powerfully displayed in the life and work of Nina Simone, as she used her platform to amplify the voice of black people and black females in particular.” (Magill) Often calling for violence in protest, her songs were not the standard, full of hope and faith Blues. She was angry and she used her music to get that point across. She gave the people who were also angry a mouthpiece and the courage to stand up for themselves and march for their freedom. “Nina herself said that through using her music to address civil rights issues she found “a purpose more important than classical music’s pursuit of excellence.”” (Magill)

Whether positive or not, blues and blues artist had a major role in the civil rights movement. Justifiably angry or understanding and peaceful, both had their own way of motivating those that sought to change social injustices.

During peaceful protest, marches, and stand-ins the “call and response” form of songs that is a trademark of the blues help the protesters spread their message loud and clear. Not only supporting the whole but trying to paint a clear picture to the other side. It was a very powerful way to deliver their message without violence. In an interview, Jamila Jones, a member of the Harambee Singers recalls being at the Highlander Folk School for nonviolent activist training when it was raided by police. The group sat in the dark building after the police had cut the power and sang “We Shall Overcome” while adding the verse “We are not afraid” while they were unjustly detained. After seeing the unsettling affect their words and song had on the officers, she realized just how powerful these songs could be. “And I could not believe it. Here these people had all the guns, the billy clubs, the power, we thought. And he was asking me, with a shake, if I would not sing so loud. And it was that time that I really understood the power of our music.”(Jamila Jones)

When sung in mass, these songs help to blur out the hatred and harassment that they received in response to this protest. Not only was it uplifting, it gave them the mental strength to withstand physical pain, as they commonly had things thrown at them, or were beaten for their bravery. It also served as a white noise so to speak that drowned out the counter protest that was often filled with racial slurs and profanity.

Not only were the blues, and blues style music, a means of emotional support for the civil rights movement and the various protesters, but the artists themselves played a pivotal role in pushing forward with the movement financially. “Many blues artists held concerts to contribute to the movement and the activists in charge of rallying supporters” (Ward, 2009-2019). Civil rights activist, and folk blues singer and songwriter, Pete Seeger held many of these concerts that benefited various civil rights groups and organizations. During these concerts he would help spread the message of the movement and popularized the song “We Shal Overcome” which would later be dubbed “The unofficial anthem for the movement”. (Ward). Which has been sung in many styles by hundreds of people all over the world. ‘That’s how we often think of the song: large groups of people gathered together, singing it as they struggle against mighty odds”. (Morrison)

One of the most prominent blues figures of that time to grace the civil rights movement was the great Odetta Holmes. An inspiration to blues and folk artist from all walks of life, including Joan Baez and Miss Janis Joplin. Known best for her song “Oh Freedom” which included elements of jazz, folk, and blues like most of her music. “Odetta is often considered the voice of the entire civil rights movement. In listening to her music, it becomes quite evident why she was favored by fans such as Rosa Parks and Dr. Martin Luther King.”

Perhaps the biggest slap in the face to Jim Crow laws came from Ray Charles himself, in his own home state of Georgia in 1961. “When Bell Auditorium announced the show, students told Charles the dance floor would be for whites only and the upper balcony would be sectioned off for blacks. The singer immediately cancelled his appearance” (Trammell, Drake, Baker, Ahmad, Kenner) After paying the fine from the venue, he refused to play in Augusta Georgia until after they desegregated.

As the music gained momentum and popularity, so did the movement. Larger crowds at concerts meant more funds for larger crowds at marches and rallies. Mainstream artist outside of the genre started getting on board and spreading the movements message through songs. Bob Dylan’s “Blowin in the Wind” was an instant sensation that caught the interest of other Blues artist not yet supporting the movement, like Sam Cooke, pushing them to jump into the collaborative snowball. Sam was a well know gospel singer turned soul and rhythm and blues man. Not willing to derail his career, Cooke steered clear of singing or recording politically charged songs. After “Blowin in the Wind”s debut on the radio, and his own arrest for attempting to stay at a whites only hotel, he recorded “A Change is Gonna Come”. “Rolling Stone now calls ‘A Change Is Gonna Come’ one of the greatest songs of all time, but in 1964 its political message was a risky maneuver.” (NPR) He continued on, supporting the Civil Rights Movement no matter the cost after this. Taking popular movement songs and chants and inserting them into his performances. The unsuspecting and predominantly white audiences sang along to songs they knew nothing of, nor of their importance. It only mattered to Sam Cooke; he knew. I think his goal was to teach the underlying message of the civil rights movement without them even realizing what was happening. Desensitizing them to the ideas and teachings of the movement through music, so when the time came for real change to come about, it would be accepted easier. His usually upbeat performances turned to a more somber and serious tone.

To the protesters, and supporters of the movement, seeing high profile activist such as Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks stand side by side with well-known blues artists such as Odetta Holmes, Sam Cooke, and Mahalia Jackson only meant one thing, the movemant was growing, fast. These artists used there standing in the communities and the public stages they were privy to, to motivate others and push for change. With one common goal, and two avenues of action, together they were a force to be reckoned with. They were reaching people in astonishing numbers through the outpour of support from the music community, gaining momentum at a higher rate than what was originally thought possible.

Prominent people were starting to take notice. With that attention came action. Popular music artist, such as Sam Cooke and Sammy Davis Jr., started refusing to play to segregated audiences. Going so far as to having it written in contracts with potential clients, and absolutely refusing to perform if their demands were not met. This got people’s attention and prompted big changes in the entertainment industry.

WDIA, a radio station in Memphis Tennessee, started to broadcast news of the movement and marches on the first all African-American format. While it may seem like a relatively small victory to most, it was huge for the African-American community. The blues finally got its much due air time and those who couldn’t be part of the movement were able to stay current with the slow but steady progress. Supporting from a distance, only able to attend in spirit out of fear of retaliation, or fear of losing what little life they had carved out for themselves. The music gave them a way to feel as if they were part of the action and gave them hope that the movement would bring about much needed change.

The Movement multiplied tenfold. Music calling for social justice was all over the airwaves, not just at rallies and marches. Artist were getting emboldened to write lyrics calling more people into action, pushing for unification. Bob Dylan went so far as to blatantly call politicians out in his hit “The Times They Are A-Changin’”. Raising eyebrows in both black and white communities, calling for those sitting on the fence with power at their disposal to take action. Pulling hard on the moral strings, the song called to people from all parts of the nation. Black, white, rich and poor. Rallying support for the ever-expanding cause. It was impossible to ignore the power behind the movement and the music.

People were putting pressure on lawmakers and politicians in a large response to the music. Marching arm in arm with people they hardly knew but felt a strong kinship with. They may not have known their name, where they were born, or what plans they had for themselves and their family. All they knew was what the music and the movement taught them; immense amounts of pain and struggle that needed to end. Truth in the music won the support of the people. They started acting like brothers and sisters, standing up for those who kept getting knocked down. The message had finally been validated in part. After two failed attempts, the march from Selma to Montgomery Alabama that eventually led to the passing of the Voting Rights Act in 1965 was a tremendous victory. Prompting Grant Green to write and record his hit “Selma March”. A reflection of the joy felt after the third march was completed without ending in blood shed or political red tape.

The unsung heroes of the civil rights movement were those who studied and practiced the songs of the movement in hushed meeting in secluded locations. Names unpublicized for fear of retaliation, without fame or limelight for protection. They were the ones who risked everything to sing. Leading the marches, protest, and set-ins in song, they blended into the background of scared yet hopeful faces. All too eager to give the credit over to the activist and artists for inspiring the masses, they were joyous just seeing their hard work come to fruition. The song leaders for the civil rights do not receive near the amount if applause as they should. Knowing if they were caught, they would face punishments far exceeding the crime, or possible death. The music and the movement gave them courage.

I think blues is one of the few genres of music capable of such great feats. To be able to simultaneously unify and uplift so many people at a time, from so many different walks of life when they have every reason to give up or be afraid. The power to persuade so many people to change and look inside themselves, reflect on their own faults is not something you hear today on local radio Although the practice of “protest through song” is not dead, it seems to me that the music of today has lost its truth. there is not much genuine vulnerability anymore, the realness just is not there anymore. After the death of Reverend Martin Luther King Jr, the blues continued to work its healing magic on the raw wounds left behind by the sins of our country. It’s difficult to spread hate when there was so much love to be heard in the blues. The love of the blues continued to draw people from every imaginable background. People saw something relatable and familiar in one another, even if it was only that one thing, it was a start.

It took on fresh new sounds and singing styles, instruments were added and taken away. It spread into unfamiliar territory, finding itself in the middle of a worldwide blues phenomenon. People couldn’t get enough, publishing records at a breakneck pace to keep up with the demand. Branching into new genres and bringing in young artist. However, to those that were still around to remember, it remained what is had always been; the sound of Freedom. Blues Played a more significant Role in US Civil Rights Movement than any other genre of music.

References

  1. https://hecmedia.org/posts/how-music-moved-the-movement-civil-rights-and-the-blues/ “How Music Moved the Movement: Civil Rights and the Blues” By Kristy Houle
  2. http://ap.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/civil-rights-movement/essays/%E2%80%9Cpeople-get-ready%E2%80%9D-music-and-civil-rights-movement-1950s “People Get Ready”: Music and the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s”
  3. https://musicedmasters.kent.edu/the-role-of-music-in-the-civil-rights-movement/ “The Role of Music in the Civil Rights Movement”
  4. https://santafe.com/article/a-history-of-blues-music “A History of Blues Music”
  5. https://www.allaboutjazz.com/a-brief-history-of-the-blues-by-ed-kopp.php “A Brief History of the Blues” By ED KOPP August 16, 2005
  6. https://atlantablackstar.com/2016/05/02/10-legendary-black-singers-who-risked-it-all-by-refusing-to-perform-for-segregated-audiences/3/’ 10 Legendary Black Singers Who Risked It All by Refusing to Perform for Segregated Audiences” Kiersten Willis May 2, 2016
  7. https://www.loc.gov/collections/civil-rights-history-project/articles-and-essays/music-in-the-civil-rights-movement/ Music In the Civil Rights Movement
  8. https://www.theedgesusu.co.uk/features/2017/11/12/black-and-blue-how-nina-simone-transformed-the-civil-rights-movement-into-music/’ Black and Blue: How Nina Simone transformed the Civil Rights movement into music” Joanna Magill on November 12, 2017
  9. https://yourstory.com/2017/05/music-of-bob-dylan “How Bob Dylan changed the course of history through his music” Sanjana Ray 24th May 2017
  10. https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/99315652/songs-of-the-civil-rights-movement “Songs Of The Civil Rights Movement” Nick Morrison January 18, 2010
  11. https://www.npr.org/2014/02/01/268995033/sam-cooke-and-the-song-that-almost-scared-him NPR Staff February 1, 2014
  12. https://www.complex.com/music/2013/02/the-25-most-important-civil-rights-moments-in-music-history/ray-charles “The 25 Most Important Civil Rights Moments in Music History” Matthew Trammell, David Drake, Ernast Baker, Insanul Ahmed, Bob Kenner FEB 07, 2013