In corporate and business finance, there are three fundamental principles that have been studied and utilized over years. The principles take into account the capital flows intended to offer support to various business ventures. In fact, from global corporations to the small and medium sized enterprises, it is apparent that each commercial venture ought to make two distinct decisions.
First, as investment matures, a corporation should make the preeminent decision concerning how capital must be restored to corporate financiers or business owners. Second, decisions ought to be made concerning how finance can be used to discover, utilize and allocate the available resources.
The organization should control places where the resource support originates and the manner through which they recuperate to be utilized (Berman and Knight, 2008). These require the application of various interrelated and fundamental principles.
This paper describes the fundamental principles constituting the basis of corporate finance including the dividend, financing, and investment principles. The paper also interprets the objectives of firm value maximization and assesses how low cost strategy can benefit a company’s financial goals.
Investment Principle
According to Aaker (2001), the investment principle of economics specifies where an organization should commit its resources. An organization might generate supplies and offers supplies, which bring revenue and realize processes that assist in the lowering of costs. However, the management of an organization must classify ventures that must bring income at a superior level compared to what the venture utilizes in terms of resources.
The symmetry point also referred to as the hurdle rate significantly depends on the degree of risk involved. The hurdle rate also depends on the manner in which it will be financed and the projected speed at which the income will be generated to cover the expenses and generate significant turnover.
Financing Principle
According to Knon and Barnes (2010), organizations should be able to recognize how resources should be supported in the best way possible. In this regard, it is imperative to finance projects that are viable and likely to have return on investment (ROI). There are two types of financing. These entail debt or amount overdue and equity. The amount overdue that is a mode corporate funding consists of government securities such as bonds and depository credit.
Equity is composed of cash and stock. The issues that should be considered under this principle include the duration for carrying the debt such as short or long term. The amount of money the organization is willing to budget for financing is also an important aspect to consider.
To finance a project effectively, the company must consider the amount of equity that should be tied up on the project. The number of shares to be sold so that the project can be fully financed should also be considered. This will ensure that the project is financed sufficiently.
Dividend Principle
This principle entails the channels where any additional income is created from successful projects. The revenues need to be ploughed back to the business in terms of new property. Alternatively, it can be given back to the financiers of the project. The amount to be given back or ploughed back is dependent on the quantity and kind of new property available.
The extent of financial risks the shareholders could be prepared to undertake might as well be considered. Additionally, the arrangement of the financing used is also given significant consideration. A small company may pay a loan early. On the other hand, a large organization may opt to distribute the revenue to the shareholders through bonuses.
The interpretation of the objectives of firm value maximization
The principles namely the investment, financing and dividend principles collaborate to influence the value of the company. The efficiency of an organization in utilizing the assets to meet the contemporary competitive market and create income defines the degree of risk in specific ventures. The symmetry point stipulates the cost of financing.
These include loan interest rates and the value of stock. The amount of cash put into financing influences the amount of capital accessible for a property to function. Subsequently, the income generated by the property is limited. The aspect facilitates the determination of the general worth of the organization.
Assessing how low cost strategy can benefit a company’s financial goals
Aaker (2001) asserts that it is imperative for the management to ensure the integration of the three principles for the organization to benefit optimally. Appropriate consideration of the investment principle drives the decision makers to consider the most inexpensive methods of producing goods and offering services (Aaker, 2001).
When the costs attached to the delivery of service and goods are lower, the organization will have the capacity to offer its customers the services and goods at a low price. Low costs translate to lower risks involved in the delivery of service and sale of goods. In this regard, the return on investment may not be as high as when the risk is high (Kono and Barnes, 2010).
Conclusion
From the discussions, it is important for companies to consider the three principles of finance as they significantly impacts the profitability of a company. Companies should be keen when deliberating investment as it affects directly on the revenue generated that in turn determines the amount of financing required.
Consequently, the financing determines the revenue generated hence the surplus that will be available for sharing among the shareholders. The integration of the three principles is important as it determines the competitiveness of the company. Effective collaboration of the principles results in the acquisition of more assets and the ability of the company to give dividends to the investors.
References
Aaker, D. (2001). Developing business strategies. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Berman, K. & Knight, J. (2008). Financial intelligence for hr professionals. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Stocks’ beta expresses how much the stock prices may change as a result of changes in the financial market prices. A stock’s beta of 1.06 indicates that for a 1% change in general market prices, the price of the particular stock will change by 1.06%. Such a stock price is considered to be less volatile.
Assets’ beta is the average of the different sources of finance that a firm chooses. The assets’ beta for a company that has been financed without debts is equal to equity’s beta. Weighted cost of capital represents the least amount of return that an investment can offer stakeholders.
When the expected rate of return from a project is lower than WACC, it is considered unviable. Managers may consider those that break-even because of the economic level of returns. However, a project must have a higher rate of return than WACC before wealth is created for holders of securities.
A majority of firms uses debts to finance growth rather than wait for the profits. Fabozzi et al. (2008, p. 507) discuss that when a firm has no debt, “the beta of its equity is the same as its assets’ beta.” They also note that it is very rare for a company to operate without incurring some debts. Using debts makes a company’s equity riskier.
Fabozzi et al. (2008, p. 507) explain that financial leverage causes “the market risk of a company’s stock to be higher than its asset’s risk.” In that case, equity’s beta exceeds assets’ beta. When the firms choose to fund assets by a combination of equity and debts, the risk involved is shared between the two groups of stakeholders.
Fabozzi et al. (2008, p. 508) discuss that the “asset market risk is the weighted average of the company’s debt beta and equity beta because the asset’s risk is shared between creditors and owners.” In simple terms, the asset beta = debts beta (fraction of assets from debts) + equity beta (fraction of assets from equity).
The equation of assets’ beta average is true because the variations from equity’s and stocks’ betas are correlated. The effect on one source of capital influences the chance of the other sources volatility. Corporate taxable income is generated after deductions of interest paid on loans. The effect reduces what a firm pays as tax which makes their burden less. On the other hand, interest received by creditors is taxed after it is paid to them.
As a result of interest on debt being deductible, debts beta in most cases is assumed to be negligible. WACC is used to “evaluate the impact of debt-financing on risk and returns to investments” (Geltner et al. 2010, p. 307). Leverage is a term used to describe the common practice used by firms to fund their projects from debts, and equity. The WACC is derived from the formula of basic holding period return (HPR).
The formula expresses assets as a sum of debts and equities. It also equates property cash flow to the sum of debt cash flow and equity cash flow. The returns received are shared by holders, and creditors. It is derived from the returns to capital generated by the firm.
WACC represents the least rate of return on a project that evaluators consider before allowing a business plan to be implemented. The formula for WACC as presented by Hawawini & Viallet (2011, p. 410) is shown below. In this case, kE represents cost of equity and kD is the cost of debt before taxation.
Bierman (p. 195) discusses that WACC can be interpreted as “the cost of both current capital and an additional dollar of new capital if the existing capital structure is maintained”. The existing capital structure refers to the percentage of debt and securities that have been used to finance a project. Debts tend to reduce WACC because of tax deductions.
As it can be seen in the formula “1 – tax rate” has a lesser effect on WACC compared to equity when the cost of capital is considered equal for both equities. WACC includes returns to creditors and shareholders. Baker and Martin discuss that WACC is the “cost of raising funds to the firm” (2011, p. 192). On the other hand, it is the rate of return that investors consider before lending a firm.
Creditors receive interest on money owed to them. Shareholders expect dividends, and gains in market value. The gains in market value are only possible if the firm chooses growth opportunities with higher rates of return than WACC. A firm can only add value to its capital after exceeding the rate of return owed to investors. The investors evaluate the firm’s strategy, opportunities of growth, and risk.
When a business opportunity promises slow growth, investors consider it as a high risk investment. Slow growth reduces a firm’s ability to repay its debts. For this reason, investors may require higher interest rates which may make a project unviable. The rate of return expected by investors also depends on what other financial assets receive as returns.
Firms choose to finance their assets with a mixture of debt, preference shares and common equity. They choose a mixture that optimizes the price of their stock. Besley and Brigham (2009, p. 485) discuss that WACC “represents the minimum return the firm must earn on its investments to maintain its current level of wealth”.
Besley and Brigham (2009) provide the formula below for calculating WACC.
The WACC of most companies represents the average cost of its capital. Lumby and Jones discuss that the WACC of most companies may not be used to rate individual projects because most companies have their investments diversified (2003, p. 427). The WACC in most cases reflects the “average level of systematic risk throughout all its operations” (Lumby and Jones 2003, p. 427).
Companies consider diversification as a means of reducing risk. The volatility of an individual project carried out by a company is unlikely to be represented by WACC because most companies calculate the overall value.
The returns expected from different securities vary. Different capital sources carry different weights. Lumby and Jones (2003, p. 748) explain that “changing a firm’s capital structure changes its WACC”. Debts are an obligation. They are considered before financial assets. Dividends and other benefits are paid to preference shares before common shares.
Importance of WACC
A higher WACC will require that the performance must be higher before generating wealth for stakeholders. Megginson & Smart discuss that firms use WACC to value the amount of effort needed before the firm can actually generate returns for shareholders (2010, p. 420). The firm’s market value declines if its WACC increases as a result of factors that the firm cannot control.
Megginson & Smart discuss that when a firm’s WACC is increased by an event it cannot address “its existing assets and its prospective investment opportunities become less valuable” (2010, p. 420). Such an effect can be expressed through a drop its market value. Such investments may go for a long period without dividends.
Calculating the cost of capital
Cost of capital involves what investors are willing to receive regularly as a result offering finances. Benninga & Czaczkles discuss that the present value of stock can be obtained from the discounted annuity values using anticipated growth in dividend streams (2000, p. 28). They give an example in which the expected growth of dividends is 10%. The following year, the dividend received on each share is $3. The present value of each share (Po) can be expressed as shown below.
In this case, rE is the cost of equity/discount rate. D1 is used to represent the expected dividend, and g to represent the expected dividend growth rate. According to Benninga & Czaczkes (2000, p. 29), the formula is summarized as shown below.
This formula holds only for firms with normal growth. This is the Leonhard Euler derivation. For supernormal growth where g> rE, the Gordon Model is applied.
The formula for the Gordon Model which has been discounted over five years can be expressed as shown below.
According to Benninga & Czaczkes (2000, p. 31), the cost of equity under Gordon Model is expressed as shown below.
Considering that anticipated dividends can be expressed in terms of the dividends received in the current year (Do). The formula for the cost of equity is expressed as shown below.
In the classic SML (Security Market Line) model, the formula for calculating the cost of equity is expressed as shown below (Benninga & Czaczkes 2000, p. 35).
In this case, rf represents the rate at which investment is considered safe, and E(rM) represents the interest rates that the financial market are expected to generate. The risk-free rate of return is reflected in financial assets with the least amount of risk such as interest rates on securities issued by government (Bennninga & Czaczkes 2000). Treasury bills are considered risk-free indicators because governments are unlikely to default. When the expression is adjusted to integrate corporate tax, the expression becomes as shown below (Benninga & Czackles 2000, p. 36).
TC is the corporate tax rate.
The cost of newly issued stock is expressed as shown below (Calculating the Cost of Capital n.d., p. 3).
The cost of retained earnings is expressed below using risk-free rate, market expected rate, and stocks beta (Calculating Cost of Capital n.d, p. 2).
using the discounted cash flow approach.
Cost of debt
The cost of debt has different approaches. Benninga & Czaczkes (2000) discuss that the cost of debt can be estimated using a firm’s existing average cost of debt even though it is not an accurate measure. The cost of debt is expressed as shown below (Calculating Cost of Capital n.d., P. 1).
rd is the rate of return expected by investors to be paid on debts.
Cost of preference capital
Preference capital is associated with preference shares. Debts reduce the amount of corporate tax that a firm is entitled to pay. Khan & Jain (2007) discuss that preference share differs from debts because payments on preference shares are made after tax deductions. Some preference shares are redeemable at maturity while others do not have a fixed maturity date. Both types receive annual fixed rates of return. Khan & Jain (2007, p. 11.10) express the cost of irredeemable shares in two expressions as shown below.
In this case, kp represents cost of preference capital, Dp is the fixed dividend, Po is the expected preference share price, f is the floatation costs expressed as a percentage of share price, and Dt is the tax rate on preference shares dividend.
Preference shares that have a maturity date and a stream of earnings are discounted to a present value. Khan & Jain (2007, p. 11.10) express that the cost of preference shares with a maturity date “is the discount rate that equates the net proceeds of sale of preference shares with the NPV of future dividends and principal repayments”.
This means that capital gains that an individual obtains today from sales are compared to the gains of holding the preference shares to maturity. The cost of preference shares with a maturity date is expressed as shown below.
Po represents share price, f is the flotation cost expressed as a percentage of share price, Dp is for dividend, and Pn is the amount paid at maturity. Kumar (2010) gives a more simplified formula for the cost of redeemable share capital as shown below.
D represents dividends, M.V is the value on maturity, N.P is the net streams gains received on preference shares, n is the number of years.
Using the average cost of 25% tax, the asset beta can be calculated using the formula below. The asset beta is expressed as: asset beta= Equity beta/ (1 + (1 – tax) D/E) (Asset Beta n.d.). D is the percentage of financing received from debts, and E from Equity.
However, since the tax rate is still unknown, the cost of equity can be estimated using stocks’ beta and market rate of return. The WACC is then used to express the volatility of expected returns.
From this formula equity beta can be generated as follows: cost of equity = risk free rate of return + beta (market rate of return – risk free rate)
The volatility of the stock market is derived from the asset beta. A value of less than 1 indicates that the assets are less volatile.
b) The same formula is applied to calculate the asset value of Coral Gambles’ Asset beta by first calculating the WACC. This is used as an estimate of the debt beta. From, the explanations above, the debt beta is always close to zero.
WACC value of 5.9% (0.0589) indicates that an additional unit of capital may cost the firm 5.9% interest. The firm must invest in projects that generate above the 6% rate of return for shareholders to get capital gains.
According to Bragg (2012, p. 142), the cost of common stock is “risk-free return rate + beta (average stock return – risk free return”. From this formula, it can be derived that stock beta = (cost of stock – risk-free rate) / (expected market return – risk-free rate)
The common stock’s beta indicates the value by which the firm’s stock price changes as a result of variations in the general stock prices. A value of 0.7039 indicates that when the market value changes by 1%, the stock price of Coral Gambles varies by 0.7%. This shows that Coral Gamble stock price is less volatile that the overall market prices.
From this calculation, it can be interpreted that investments must generate above the 5% rate of return for the project to add value to shareholders. The least acceptable cost of capital is 5%. This is the point where the firm operates at break-even.
Conclusion
The market stock’s beta of the similar company is more volatile than Coral Gamble stocks or the general market price. Coral Gamble stock price is less volatile than the average market prices. The WACC for both companies indicate that the CFO needs to search for growth opportunities that generate more than 6% rate of return. Investors may consider interest rates that are close to 5%.
The price (Po) generated in the calculation of share price is the discounted value of the current share price, and expected income streams. The income streams are paid to shareholders as yield per share or dividends. The assets’ beta indicates less volatility than stocks’ beta.
However, the stock’s beta generates its volatility from assets’ beta. The Coral Gamble assets’ beta indicates that the firm’s assets are more stable than shifts in market prices, and interest rates. The asset beta has been calculated as a sum of the impact caused by the volatilities of different sources of capital. It can also be calculated from the equity beta, ratio of debts to equity, and tax rate.
Equity beta is the beta quoted by financial reports as stock price volatility. Assets’ beta is equal to equity in situations where a firm has not used debts to finance its assets. The impact of debts’ beta on asset beta is reduced by the fact that it reduces corporate tax.
Reference List
Asset Beta n.d. Web.
Baker, H, & Martin, G 2011, Capital Structure and Corporate Financing Decisions: Theory, Evidence, and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Benninga, S, & Czaczkes, B 2000, Financial Modeling, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Besley, S, & Brigham, E 2009, Principles of Finance, South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason.
Bierman, H 2010, An Introduction to Accounting and Mangerial Finance: A Merger of Equals, World Scientific Publishing, London.
Bragg, S 2012, Business Ratios and Formulas: A Comprehensive Guide, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Calculating the Cost of Capital. n.d. Web.
Fabozzi, J. F, Drake, P. P, & Polimeni, S. R 2008, The Complete CFO Handbook: From Accounting to Accountability, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
Geltner, D, Miller, N, Clayton, J & Eichholtz, P 2010, Commercial Real Estate Analysis & Investments, Cengage Learning, Mason.
Hawawini G, & Viallet, C 2011, Finance for Executives: Managing for Value Creation, South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason.
Khan, M, & Jain, P 2007, Financial management, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.
Corporate finance is an area of finance dealing with the financial decisions corporations make and the tools and analysis used to make these decisions. The primary goal of corporate finance is to maximize corporate value while reducing the firm’s financial risks. Although it is in principle different from managerial finance which studies the financial decisions of all firms, rather than corporations alone, the main concepts in the study of corporate finance are applicable to the financial problems of all kinds of firms. The discipline can be divided into long-term and short-term decisions and techniques.
Capital investment decisions are long-term choices about which projects receive investment, whether to finance that investment with equity or debt and when or whether to pay dividends to shareholders. On the other hand, the short-term decisions can be grouped under the heading “Working capital management”. This subject deals with the short-term balance of current assets and current liabilities; the focus here is on managing cash, inventories, and short-term borrowing and lending (such as the terms on credit extended to customers). Corporate Finance has written about the ways that companies have found to manage their capital and cash more efficiently.
Now Euro money Institutional Investor has invested substantial additional resources in the group’s flagship title, Euro money. Euro money is now devoting even more of its time to the topics close to our heart managing risk, managing capital and, above all, managing cash. We believe that we will provide you with an even better resource by combining the efforts of Corporate Finance and Euro money.
Euro money provides Extensive coverage of cash management, treasury, and regulatory issues regular reporting on too. The world’s Central and Development Banks and the supervision of the national banking services, giving Euro moneyís thousands of subscribers a clear guide to differing monetary policies and the regional projects that are currently being financed. Valuations constitute a significant part of any transaction process, be it in the nature of an acquisition, divestiture, joint venture, merger, more demure, or for filing tax returns.
Its valuation practice distinguishes itself by knowing the specific industry in which the client operates and, providing proactive commercial and market-focused inputs to the assignment. Our analysis will provide clear and credible advice and will ultimately add value in negotiating transactions, assisting in the restructuring process, or segregating costs of an asset. Professionals provide independent advice to directors, shareholders, or management:
Determine the right price to pay or accept for a business
Determine the value of equity to be issued to new shareholders or partners
Evaluate merger/swap ratios
Evaluate and defend an unwelcome and unsolicited takeover bid
Corporate Recovery
Make fundamental changes in business direction
Alter your business structure
Remove rebuild components
Inspire confidence, even as your options are narrowing.
Seeking professional assistance in a timely manner would help you address the problems being faced before they become insurmountable. You would need an adviser with technical and analytical strength to determine what went wrong, deep industry knowledge to help you create effective solutions, operational skills to help you achieve your goals, and a worldwide reputation. Corporate Recovery practice in India provides services for underperforming companies, creditors, financial institutions, and shareholders. We bring to each engagement our strength ours.
Multidisciplinary, cross-border teams
Global knowledge base
Seamless communications
Worldwide industry and financial contacts
Our practice has 8 dedicated professionals located at our offices in Delhi and Mumbai. Our professionals are readily accessible to give a personal service – one distinguished by high levels of partner and manager involvement. If you are an owner/principal, director, creditor, or lender and you see any signs of declining corporate health; we have the right skill sets to assist you. Our range of services extends to offering restructuring advisory and loan management services to assist businesses through difficult times. Restructuring and Advisory Services Corporate Recovery provides restructuring and advisory services to stakeholders in underperforming companies and companies experiencing liquidity problems in sectors and in all markets.
Determination of elements contributing to underperformance
Formulating operational and financial solutions to address underperformance
Development of robust plans to improve the performance of a business
Divestiture of nonperforming business
Legal entity restructuring
Debt restructuring
Advisory services to secured and unsecured creditors
Monitor business operations for stakeholders
Loan Management Services
Today’s financial institutions are becoming increasingly specialized and ever more cost-efficient.
Bibliography
Book reference of corporate finance By Shannon Graff Hysell.
In the aftermath of the recent global financial crisis, several arguments have been brought forward regarding which is better between high and low inflation rates. From the onset, high inflation rates erode the purchasing power or capability of consumers and at the same time result in economic instability for governments, institutions, and individuals (Taylor, 2008, p. 11). On the other hand, proponents of elevated inflation rates argue that in conditions of low inflation, financial institutions like banks find it hard to adjust to changes that occur abruptly. The argument goes on that with elevated inflation rates, there is always a chance to cut down on interest rates as compared to instances when the inflation rates are low and interest rates need to be downsized (Hilsenrath, 2010, p. 1). There is also another argument for high inflation in the sense that debtors to financial institutions will in turn raise their incomes and thus find it easier to clear their loans. However, a critical look at these arguments shows that low inflation rates augur well with humanity than otherwise.
Analysis
Unrelenting high inflation rates place the economic stability of nations, institutions, and indeed individuals on a knife-edge. Purchasing ability is reduced with high inflation, leading to increased costs of living for the ordinary citizen. Consequences of elevated levels of inflation do not normally get equally felt across the financial system. This means that there is a group of people who are shielded from the impact while others have to come face-to-face with it (Taylor, 2008, p. 11). For instance, loaners who get paid a preset fixed amount of interest end up losing in terms of purchasing ability while those indebted get a reprieve of sorts. Employees and pensioners with preset payments also end up the losers in such an arrangement.
Very elevated levels and unforeseen inflation are detrimental to the general financial system (Taylor, 2008, p. 12). If the 2% level can be upheld while at the same time aiming to go lower than that, then the better. With that, it will mean efficiency in the market and it will be a simpler undertaking for companies in their annual budgeting and laying down both short-term and long-term plans.
The productivity of many companies gets slowed down by high inflation since they are compelled to divert resources away from production to lay more emphasis on gains and losses from monetary inflation.
With the future in doubt in high inflation cases, then fewer and fewer investments are bound to be made. This phenomenon also discourages saving. Taxpayers are always on the receiving end in such scenarios since it’s only a few governments that adjust their tax brackets with the prevailing inflation rates (Hilsenrath, 2010, p. 2).
Strains between international business partners are inevitable in cases where the inflation rates differ between the respective economies. Exports from the side with higher inflation are more expensive and will affect the stability of trade if the exchange rates were preset and fixed. Instabilities in monetary exchange rates due to inflation also pose a negative impact on business between the two countries.
Relevance to Corporate Finance
Inflation will always exist in the world financial system, though the rates will always differ from one period to another. Inflation has a few positive effects like providing the possibility for maneuvering for financial institutions in terms of interest rates (Hilsenrath, 2010, p. 2). It also often leads to debt reliefs and labor market adjustments, though the negative impacts surpass these.
What seems workable is being able to maintain the inflation levels as low as possible all the time. The 2% level can be set as the highest tolerable at any given time.
Reference List
Hilsenrath, J. (2010). Low Inflation Always Best? Some Urge a Policy Rethink. Wall.
Street Journal (Eastern Edition), p. A.2. Web.
Taylor, T. (2008). Principles of Economics. Minnesota: Freeload Press.
Capital budgeting is seen as one of the methods for assessing the strategic value of investing in assets like plants and machinery. This is important since there occurs a fund lockup due to money invested in assets and the management needs to assess the benefits derivable from the use of machinery as against its costs and benefits. In this context, it is also seen that the funds that could be invested in the purchase of assets could be either the company’s own funds or loan funds. If loan funds are used, the element of interest and servicing of loans are also important considerations, since they impinge upon final costs.
Complexities of Capital budgeting
The complexities with respect to capital budgeting could arise due to either over investments in assets or under investments in assets. Both these aspects need careful consideration. If there are over investments, there would be more loan interest servicing to be done, if outside funds are used for asset acquisition. In case internal funds are used, it would deplete the funds due to stakeholders for future dividend payouts.
Again over investments in assets bring in more charges on the Depreciation account and Asset Maintenance / servicing account. (Brigham and Ehrhardt, P 502).
This would further erode profits and reduce dividends to stakeholders. Also, assets may not be fully utilized and therefore, the idle capacity of assets may results.
This is because the use of assets is almost as important as its acquisitions.
If asset purchase is lower than required, this would also be detrimental to the financial interests of the company, in that competitors may gain benefit out of using the latest machines and the competitiveness of this company may be lost. By acquiring the latest technology in the field, rivals may gain market share of the company, which has desisted from making adequate investments in assets.
Forecast capital asset requirements
It is also necessary that firms be able to forecast the need for capital assets, well in advance of actual requirements in order that planned and well-organized capital asset installation could be made.( Brigham and Ehrhardt, P 502).
There are also aspects that “returns on projects should be measured based on cash flow generated and the timing of these cash flows. They should also consider both the positive and negative side effects of these projects.” (Damodaran).
Uses of CB
Capital budgeting is also important since the quantum of funds required for it is very high and could be used for a variety of purposes.
Capital budgeting could be used internal, for:
Replacement of idle and useless machines
Expansion of business and markets
Research and development needs
Performance of long terms contracts that could be lucrative for business and provide employment and income opportunities to the local population.
There are many aspects to be considered before launching a capital budgeting program in terms of costs, benefits, and cost-benefit analysis. However, it is also necessary to “consider alternative uses of capital and resources as costs to the capital budgeting project or investment. “ (The Top 10 Things to Consider When Making a Capital Budgeting or Investment Decision).
Inflationary impacts on the cost of capital and future cash inflows
The aspects of future inflationary erosion on future cash flows cannot be circumvented. This is because inflation could: firstly, increase the acquisition costs of future assets
secondly, also reduce the actual value of inflows of revenues or savings. An asset that costs $100,000 today may cost more during later years, and therefore an aspect of inflationary accounting also has to be considered during capital budgeting programs.
Again, if one were to consider cash inflows, with inflationary impacts, the actual worth of inflows could be much lower than their book values, since the value of $ would have fallen in later years due to inflationary and fuel pricing. These aspects also need to be considered.
But it needs to be mentioned that this should not vitiate the implementation of NPV or WACC schemes because these schemes should build inflation premium into the interest rates not for a particular year, but throughout the duration of the investment project and should be the “average rate of inflation expected over the security’s lifetime.” (Brigham and Ehrhardt, P. 175).
Thus it could be said that the determinants of capital budgeting would need to be seen on a case-to-case basis and the financial analyst needs to consider the totality of the case before making informed judgments. In the case of capital budgeting, the main aspect to be considered is whether an asset could be acquired or not; a project is financially viable or not. The modalities of the purchase could be taken at later stages as per the directives of the Board of Directors.
Works Cited
Brigham, Eugene F., and Ehrhardt, Michael C. Importance of capital budgeting: Theory and Practice. Financial Management, P. 502.
Brigham, Eugene F., and Ehrhardt, Michael C. Theory and Practice: The Determinants of Market Interest Rates. Inflation Premium (IP). Financial Management, P. 175.
Capital Budgeting: Net Cash Flows. Studyfinance. 2008. Web.
The current credit predicament and the modern large swings in the international marketplaces pose the inquiry of whether significantly leveraged positions employing intricate fiscal instruments could have improved market instability. Through the initiation of gradually more hedging instruments, rational representatives take greater arrangements in the hedging set and their benefits offset the information collection costs for fairness. Increase in risk hedging instruments is linked to enhanced unsteadiness in the structure. Firms in nations that are deemed more fraudulent have an inclination of being more levered and prefer more short-range debt. Capital suppliers have the competence of influencing the style in which companies are funded. The lack of valuable administration of the effect of foreign currency could result in unforeseen corporate tax repercussions that will in turn control cash flow. Vigilant and well-timed (tax) strategizing guarantees the opportunity for minimizing (or even eradicating) the unfavorable influence of foreign exchange upshots on the general tax statement. A lengthened period of success and calm is incisively the explanation behind Value at Risk models underperforming mostly in the course of misfortune in developed marketplaces. Such happenings misinform Value at Risk models in the developed marketplaces as, contrary to emerging marketplaces, they could lack influential instability and collapses in the knowledge set for stretched periods, with the consequent approximated limits being exterior to the region of earlier backing if a crash ensues.
Introduction
Corporate finance denotes a field of finance that tackles sources of financing, the capital structure of corporations, the instruments and assessment employed in the allotment of monetary resources, and the activities of managers in an attempt to raise the value of corporations with the objective of maximizing or increasing investor value. The present recognition calamity and the latest huge rolls in the global marketplaces generate the inquiry whether greatly leveraged situations employing intricate monetary tools could have enhanced market unpredictability (Brock, Hommes & Wagener 2009). An augment in risk hedging instruments has been linked to increased instability in the structure. Capital suppliers can influence the way in which companies are funded. This report discusses different factors of corporate finance from a global viewpoint to enhance the identification of the dissimilar facets in the dynamics, the means of obtaining funding, and determine innovative and successful trends.
Markets and Hedging Instruments
In their article, Brock, Hommes, and Wagener (2009) highlight the notion that an increase in the number of hedging instruments could destabilize markets when traders have heterogeneous anticipations and adapt their conduct in accordance with encounters anchored support learning. The present acknowledgment calamity and the modern great sways in the global marketplaces generate the inquiry of whether greatly leveraged arrangements employing intricate monetary tools could have enhanced market instability. In an uncomplicated asset pricing representation with heterogeneous beliefs, the introduction of additional Arrow securities could subvert markets and thus augment price instability, and simultaneously reduce standard welfare. In the past decade, there has been a volatile intensification of risk hedging instruments in monetary markets. Moreover, there exists empirical proof that venture choices are (partially) propelled by relative performance.
It has of late been established that under such situations marketplaces could be exposed to more monetary-sector turmoil as compared to the past (Brock, Hommes & Wagener 2009). The authors sought to formalize this notion in a systematized asset pricing representation with assorted convictions. They used Arrow securities to signify hedging instruments; the Arrow securities could be considered placeholders for intricate monetary tools. The article emphasizes that the inclusion of Arrow securities in the marketplaces could greatly interfere with price variations thus raising volatility while decreasing average welfare. With the introduction of progressively more hedging instruments, rational representatives take greater positions in the hedging set and their gains offset the information collection costs for reasonableness.
Incase dealers feel that the supply is lowly priced, they estimate it with the hedging instruments accessible, in addition to the ones they can manage to find in the estimated range, and spend the funds to purchase the supply. Since the reserve, as well as its estimate, has nearly a similar share formation, the dealers have roughly no payment hazard; the bonuses they must give on the Arrow security range come from the dividend incomes from the reserve. Nevertheless, they take a gamble on attaining a benefit from the price movement (Brock, Hommes & Wagener 2009). Nothing from the moral vulnerability, need for transparency, poor directive, and corruption to mention a few highlighted in many studies on the current crisis are present in the support of this article. Nonetheless, increased risk hedging instruments are linked to enhanced volatility in the structure (Beneda 2013). It happens this way because risk hedging instruments induce creation of bigger positions, which, in return, form greater incentives for trading policies that are on the proper side of the marketplace and possibly big losses for policies that are on the improper side of the marketplace.
Variation of Capital Structure across Countries
In their article, Fan, Titman, and Twite (2012) assess the manner in which the institutional setting controls capital structure, in addition to the debt maturity options of businesses in thirty-nine, developed and developing nations. Corporate financing alternatives are established through a blend of aspects that are associated with the attributes of the company, in addition to their institutional setting. Though the majority of studies concentrate on the significance of firm attributes through evaluating corporate financing options in the individual nations, there is a mounting literature that considers the way institutional dissimilarities influence the options. The authors discuss the way institutional dissimilarities amid nations could influence the manner in which companies in the nations are funded. In particular, they take into consideration institutional variables that reveal the capability of creditors to implement legal agreements, the tax management of debt, as well as equity, and the significance and handling of monetary establishments that signify main suppliers of capital. It is anticipated that feeble legal formations and faint public management of regulations ought to be linked to a smaller amount of external equity, in addition to lesser maturity debt agreements.
There is an expectation for companies in nations that have lesser tax inclinations for debt to be less levered (Fan, Titman & Twite 2012). The article also sought to evaluate whether capital suppliers are influential in any way. Though the majority of studies on capital structures concentrate on the funding inclinations of companies, at the aggregate stage, the capital structure is established through the inclinations of the capital suppliers (that is, financiers), in addition to the inclinations of companies. Mainly, external aspects that result in the providers of capital favoring to have additional or fewer equity as compared to debt will as well control the capital systems of companies.
In nations having weak regulations and implementation, there is a likelihood of the domination of monetary instruments (for instance, short-term debt) that permit insiders less prudence and are contractually simpler to interpret (Fan, Titman & Twite 2012). The legal systems that affirm the settlement of default varies broadly across nations. In fact, in a number of nations such as the US, there is a clear bankruptcy code, which identifies and restricts the rights and assertions of creditors and enhances the reformation of the existing firms. On the contrary, in other nations that have no bankruptcy codes or just weakly implemented codes, creditors normally have challenges obtaining collateral through liquidating troubled businesses or taking over distressed business assets.
The classical tax structure represents the formation where dividend expenses are deducted at the shared and individual stages, and interest defrayments are tax-based company expenditures. Some nations that have a classical tax structure encompass China, Japan, England, and India to mention a few. If the tax benefits from the purchase are encouraging, companies incline their capital structures in support of more debt (Chen & Wang 2012). Nevertheless, it has been established that tax impact is not as powerful and invasive as other impacts on the capital structure. The legal setting also has a significant control on capital structure preferences. The article highlights that the most potent result is that companies in nations that are deemed more corrupt have a tendency of being more levered and employ more short-range debt. Capital suppliers have the capacity of influencing the manner in which companies are funded. Most remarkably, the debt maturity system of firms in nations having a bigger banking industry have a tendency of being shorter, revealing the inclinations of banking institutions lending short-term. From the article, there are grounds to believe that if companies can increase their capital alongside equity and long-standing debt, they will be in a better position of making lasting investments that will greatly enhance economic advancement.
International Valuation, Capital Budgeting
As Wang and Lee (2010) note in their article, large ventures are capital schemes of tactical significance that normally have a long financial life cycle. They are typified by numerous unknowns, which are difficult to foretell at their early planning phase. Thus, the result of such ventures could vary in the course of their extended financial life, and the variations could be vital because the bigger the ventures are, the more planned significance they normally have. Nevertheless, the information required for capital budgeting is usually not recognized with confidence. The basis of ambiguity could be the total cash inflows, the instability of the cash flow, the existence of the scheme, or the rate of discount.
A capital budgeting method is recommended in an uncertainty setting where the perception of likelihood is utilized in defining unclear occurrences, and cash flow knowledge could be specified as a unique kind of fuzzy figures. Traditional advances to capital budgeting are anchored in the assertion that probability theory is essential and adequate to tackle the ambiguity that inspires the approximations of vital parameters (Wang & Lee 2010). The fuzzy capital budgeting techniques permit cash flow approximations to be handled as fuzzy figures, and in certain situations, fuzzy cash flows could better reveal the ambiguity in the scheme.
The major tools for investment decision-making are the capital budgeting techniques anchored in the discounted cash flow (DCF). The net present value denotes the highest normally employed discounted cash flow-anchored technique. In static situations, discounted cash flow-anchored techniques offer consistent outcomes. Nevertheless, the real world occurrences are rarely still. Particularly in instances of large ventures having extended financial lives, the static discounted cash flow-anchored techniques do not offer a greatly dependable depiction of the productivity and potentials given by the investment schemes. Since discounted cash flow-anchored techniques have been the most excellent thing at hand, they have been evident in management progressions in the course of their years of application. Even though there are numerous developments to the novel method, the fundamental unacceptable suppositions are still extant (Baker, Dutta & Saadi 2011). The benefit of this approach is that the valuation representation offers a technique that explicitly deems the uncertainty linked to potential cash flows. On the contrary, the demerits of the technique are evident as its importance is just a subjective approximation that could highly vary from one individual to another. Hence, an objective resolve of the importance of a risky investment scheme will be nearly unachievable through merely employing such an approach.
Though the risk-adjusted discount-rate technique offers a way of regulating the fundamental risk-free discount rate, an alternative technique, the certainty-equivalent technique, regulates the approximated significance of the unsettled cash flows. The fundamental justification is that, with a hazardous cash flow, the resolution creator will assess the hazardous cash flow through connecting an anticipated utility to the cash flow; the utility approximation is assumed to be equivalent to the utility obtained from some given quantity. Some financial aspects, for instance, competition, price increases, consumer inclinations, technical advancement, and labor marketplace situations result in the impossibility of predicting the future. The fuzzy real option technique backs the purpose of the optimal time to discard the scheme, which is not possible with the traditional technique. The fuzzy real option valuation provides an extensive means of expressing the significance of potential unlocked by the scheme, which is further improved with regularly restructured fuzzy cash flows (Wang & Lee 2010).
Consistent with the findings in the article, the fuzzy real option valuation augments with rising anticipated cash flow approximations; practical administration could control this through creating market policies to advance the sales and cut down the expenses. Fuzzy real option valuation augments with rising fuzzy instability; the business administration could be practical and establish the means of developing to other marketplaces and product advances as the creations of their tactical resolutions. The more the period to maturity, the higher will be the fuzzy real option valuation; practical management could ensure this progress through upholding protective obstructions and retaining a technical lead (Wang & Lee 2010). An augment in the riskless rate of returns will raise the fuzzy real option valuation, and this could be further developed by strongly checking variations in the rates of interest. Finally, the real option valuation will reduce if significance is misplaced in the course of the rescheduling of the venture, but this could be addressed through either generating trade hindrances for competitors or excellently administering major resources.
Managing Foreign Exchange Risk at the Corporate Level
The lack of effective management of the effect of foreign currency (whether up or down) could result in unanticipated corporate tax implications that will in turn influence cash flow (De Haen et al. 2010). Cost administration is a priority for every multinational firm, as well as local participants, particularly in the present monetary predicament. Nevertheless, some of the cost aspects are difficult to handle. For instance, foreign exchange administration is a great difficulty for all international treasurers. If the foreign exchange challenge could be prevented, then the ensuing tax experience is of course annulled. This could be attained through correctly hedging the foreign exchange exposure. Foreign exchange hedging could be ordered, for instance, through derivative tools (such as currency exchanges) or through finishing a comparable deal with the conflicting foreign exchange hazard such that both foreign exchange exposures, though hypothetically at hand, eradicate one another as they crystallize (that is, finish debt financing and offer a loan for related situations denominated in an equivalent currency). The tax implications of such hedging procedures ought to be given exceptional deliberation.
While managing foreign exchange risk at the corporate stage, there is a difficulty regarding the one to, in reality, hedge the foreign exchange risk (De Haen et al. 2010). One alternative is the use of a third-party banker though this could be costly. On this note, one also has to evaluate beforehand whether the firm in question can withhold any hedging premium given for tax reasons. Supposing that the existing corporate tax rate is thirty-five percent, the outlay of such a hedging premium following tax is sixty-five percent. Nevertheless, in various jurisdictions, such a tax subtraction could just be alleged when the firm shows the valid trade grounds for making the defrayment.
When the hedging premium is given to a third-party banker, the existing tax establishments are not likely to dispute the tax deduction for rationales of (unfavorable) transfer pricing. Watchful and opportune (tax) strategizing ensures the possibility of minimizing (or even eliminating) the unfavorable influence of foreign exchange outcomes on the general tax bill of the group. Nonetheless, such foreign exchange optimization ought to be opportune (that is, upfront) and carefully deliberated (Mancini, Ranaldo & Wrampelmeyer 2013). Additionally, it ought to be anchored in and vindicated by a well-grounded economic foundation. This will be possible if it is illustrated in every jurisdiction entailed given that the system is entrenched on a suitable level of germane substance.
Forex Risk in Developed vs. Emerging Markets
Zikovic and Filer (2013) affirm that there is an inherent difficulty in evaluating and categorizing contending Value at Risk (VaR) as well as Expected Shortfall (ES) representations due to the measuring of just a single comprehension of the fundamental data creation progression. The findings in the article demonstrate that the mainstream opinion that Value at Risk models are better adapted to developed markets when judged against the emerging markets is false, particularly in the course of a disaster period. Supervisors and financiers ought to transform their misinterpretation that because emerging marketplaces are more unstable and less developed, they just require strong foreign exchange risk determinants and applying Value at Risk models is sufficient for peaceful and tractable developed marketplaces. An extended period of affluence and calm is incisively the reason behind Value at Risk models underperforming particularly badly in the course of calamity in developed marketplaces. Such occurrences deceive Value at Risk models in the developed marketplaces because, different from emerging marketplaces, they could lack powerful instability and collapses in the knowledge set for lengthened periods, with the ensuing approximated limits being outside the region of earlier backing if a crash happens.
In the occurrences of crashes, regulators ought to be wary regarding the value of traditional Value at Risk hazard determinants when employed by groups having mainly stocks from developed marketplaces (Mandel & Tomšík 2013). As findings from the study caution, higher consideration has to be offered to practically modeling the tails of the delivery and selecting the most reasonable advance to Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall modeling even if it calls for lesser venture proceeds. Though the sector is unsupportive of such practices, because of unavoidable increase in needed capital backlogs and lesser short-range productivity, to create an excellent risk administration structure regulators have to consider the fragility of Value at Risk models that also broaden to an extent to Expected Shortfall models. There is far less dissimilarity involving contending Value at risk/Expected Shortfall models than contemplated, and just a handful of models are considerably advanced. The authors cast uncertainty on Value at Risk/Expect shortfall model comparison researches as they mainly evaluate the performance of the assessed risk models of a single realization of the data creation progression (Zikovic & Filer 2013). Finally, foreign exchange risk determinants mainly evaluate the performance of the examined risk model of a single comprehension of the data creating procedure with such an appraisal normally being deceptive.
Conclusion
The present credit predicament and instability in the global marketplaces create the query of whether greatly leveraged positions utilizing elaborate fiscal instruments could have enhanced market instability. Augmented risk hedging instruments are connected with boosted instability in the formation. Additionally, the debt maturity classification of corporations in states having a bigger banking industry have a propensity for being shorter, disclosing the fondness of banking establishments lending short-term. Ineffective management of the consequence of foreign currency could bring about unanticipated corporate tax propositions that will in turn sway cash flow. Foreign exchange risk determining factors mainly appraise the performance of the examined risk model of a solitary comprehension of the data creating practice with such an assessment normally being disingenuous.
References
Baker, H, Dutta, S & Saadi, S 2011, ‘Management views on real options in capital budgeting’, Journal of Applied Finance, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 18-29.
Beneda, N 2013, ‘The impact of hedging with derivative instruments on reported earnings volatility’, Applied Financial Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 165-179.
Brock, W, Hommes, C & Wagener, F 2009, ‘More hedging instruments may destabilize markets’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1912-1928.
Chen, N & Wang, W 2012, ‘Kyoto Protocol and capital structure: A comparative study of developed and developing countries’, Applied Financial Economics, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 1771-1786.
De Haen, K, Pacsorasz, D, van Harten, M & van der Voort, C 2010, ‘Foreign exchange tax risk management: Keeping pace in the volatile world of currencies’, Journal ofCorporateTreasury Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 160-170.
Fan, J, Titman, S & Twite, G 2012, ‘An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 23-56.
Mancini, L, Ranaldo, A & Wrampelmeyer, J 2013, ‘Liquidity in the foreign exchange market: Measurement, commonality, and risk premiums’, The Journal of Finance, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1805-1841.
Mandel, M & Tomšík, V 2013, ‘Causes and consequences of emerging market central banks’ long-term foreign exchange exposure’, Eastern European Economics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 26-49.
Wang, S & Lee, C 2010, ‘A fuzzy real option valuation approach to capital budgeting under uncertainty environment’, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 695-713.
Zikovic, S & Filer, R 2013, ‘Ranking of VaR and ES models: Performance in developed and emerging markets’, Czech Journal of Economics & Finances, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 327-359.
Caterpillar, Inc. (CAT) is a huge firm with an international footprint with 68% of the total sales coming from other countries apart from U.S; this makes it a leading company in the industry (Caterpillar 2012). The firm produces earthmoving equipment used in activities such as logging, general construction, road building, petroleum, agriculture, and mining that it supplies to the international market (Wilcox 2011). The firm also manufactures lift trucks and the inner combustion engines (Wilcox 2011; Bern 2012). The firm was established in 1925 and it’s headquartered in Peoria, Illinois (Bern 2012; Finance.yahoo.com 2012a).
The economy of U.S. is recovering from financial crisis while the rest of the world is experiencing either slow growth or recession. As a result the demand for CAT’s product seems to have dipped across the globe.
Therefore, this paper will discuss the fundamental and technical factors that make Caterpillar’s stock potentially profitable for investment. It will also include the valuation of the firm using various methods such as NAV, P/E multiple and Discounted Cash Flow. Finally, this paper will give recommendation to any investor considering acquisition of CAT’s stock.
Fundamental analysis
CAT shareholders have recently enjoyed concrete return fundamentals. For the purpose of this analysis, I will consider margins, EPS growth, and dividends among others to determine the firm’s performance.
Margins matter
Caterpillar is in a position to keep the bulk of what it earns from sales, and the more cash it keeps the more it has to fund growth, finance strategic plans and distribute to the owners as dividends and share repurchases. Over the last twelve months the firm’s gross, operating and net margins have been 26.2%, 11.9%, and 8.2% respectively (Jayson 2012).
A firm with low gross margins, which have a downward trend, is frequently failing to benefit from available opportunities, and perhaps trying to lower the prices. Therefore, if it is unable to minimize costs its share will have a distinctly bleak position (Jayson 2012; Knight 2012).
The economic shocks recently experienced worldwide may significantly affect a firm’s profitability, which implies that a five-year analysis of the firm’s margins is worth looking at. An investor cannot reach a solid conclusion on the firm’s health, but one can better comprehend what to anticipate and what to look out for (Jayson 2012; Knight 2012).
Because of business seasonality, the TTM (Trailing Twelve Months) figures in the year 2011 cannot be compared with full year figures preceding them. To make a comparison between prior-year levels and quarterly margins, consult Chart 2.
Chart 1: Yearly Margins
For the five-year period, gross margin, operating margin and net margin were high at 26.5%, 11.9% and 8.2% respectively and had an average of 24.7%, 9.0% and 6.4% respectively. The gross margin, operating margin, and net margin for the TTMs were 26.2%, 11.9%, and 8.2% respectively with basis points that were better than five-year period average of 150, 290 and 180 basis points respectively.
Chart 2: Quarterly Margins
The firm registered a TTM return-on-equity (ROE) of 38% and return-on-assets (ROA) of 6%. ROE was higher than the industry average. A return-on-capital Employed of 13.5% supports the efficient utilization of the capital (Merola 2012).
Earnings per Share (EPS) have increased considerably over the years. The EPS for instance, has increased by 254.07% to $7.40 in the year 2011 compared with the 2009 EPS of $2.09. The management announced an average EPS guidance of $9.25 for every share in the year 2012. In the meantime, sales have practically doubled in the period. In 2009, the sales were $32 million and increased to $60 million last year (2011). The firm predicts that it will make $70 million as revenue for year 2012 (Merola 2012). Analyst firms like Morgan Stanley, Morningstar, Citigroup, and Barclays Capital among others, covering Caterpillar have projected the firm’s EPS for the next four years. The projection is determined by the First Call according to earnings predicted by the analysts (Caterpillar 2012) as shown by Table 1.
Table 1: EPS estimates
EPS First Call Estimated
Year
2012
2013
2014
2015
EPS estimate
9.51
11.36
13.34
14.83
On June 2011, CAT announced an increase of the quarterly dividends by 5% to $0.46 for every share. The dividends increase was to enable the firm’s stock to provide a 1.9% as yield. Over the years the CAT’s dividend yield declined considerably because its stock increased by 73% over a twelve-month period since June 2010 to June 2011 (eDividendStocks.com 2011).
Since 1933, CAT has been paying regular dividends to owners and it has increased the dividends for 18 years in a row. In 2010, the firm increased its dividend by 5% as shown by Chart 3. The 2011 dividend increase of 20% was significantly little compared to 47% dividend increase from its objective in 2010 (eDividendStocks.com 2011).
Increase of the firm’s dividend is another way of indicating how CAT is committed to increasing shareholders value. Currently, it is facilitating considerable investment that will prepare CAT for upcoming improvement in business cycle as well as in attainment of its long-range financial goals (eDividendStocks.com 2011).
The growth of the dividend has several inconsistent spots. In the latest financial crisis, CAT omitted one year of growth in dividend, and paid the quarterly dividends to the shareholders at $0.42 for every share for a total of eight quarters. Similarly, the same took place in 2002 recession (Dividend Monk 2011). The firm has a payout ratio of about 30%; thus, the long-range dividend prospects are secure in that view, even though dividend might be held stagnant in periods of improbability and low profits. The debt/equity ratio is at a high of 2.6 while the interest cover is below 5. The statement of financial position weakness is just not a short-range problem but it presents risk to dividend in the long-term.
Apart from dividend payments, investors are also rewarded in form of share repurchases. In 2011, the firm endorsed the expansion of firm’s present repurchase program. This program was formerly adopted in 2007 and it was supposed to conclude at the end of the year 2011. About $3,750 million of the authorized amount of $7,500 million under the repurchase program is still available for use in the future. Currently, the firm does not plan to undertake any stock buybacks under this program. The current program will end at the end of the year 2015 or once the buyback is completed (FNNO Staff 2011).
CAT’s outstanding customer network as well as scale gives it equally outstanding control of cost to steer any type of macro-environment. Investment in China was overblown because of high competition and currently there is no indication of any investment capacity in that country. Due to this the firm is likely to go to Indiana, which normally has high margins because of non-unionized operations. Similarly, CAT is penetrating the international markets that currently constitute “three-fifths of machine and engine sales market” (Takeover analyst 2012, p.1). But CAT is faced with more risks like commodity volatility because of Bucyrus acquisition (Takeover analyst 2012).
Behind these figures is a dedicated management team, which has demonstrated the discipline of making wise investments and decisions. Throughout the prior business up-cycle that took place in mid-2000s, the firm’s management remained strong. Recently, CAT has performed better than the market, ten times the past twelve quarters. In reality, management has offered strong guidance of the company over the years amid political and economic challenges that have affected CAT Company (Merola 2012). As a result, the management continues to be bullish on the firm’s future prospects (Merola 2012). Of late, CAT’s CEO, Ed Rapp has offered his outlook that “CAT is only two years into what is typically a six or seven year cycle” (Merola 2012, p.1). In addition, “tail winds” emerging from ultimate economic recoveries of Europe and North America will boost the firm in out-years (Merola 2012).
Market Value Added (MVA)
MVA indicates the variance between shareholders’ capital and firm’s market value; this in summary is the “capital claims that the shareholders and bondholders hold against the firm plus equity and debt market value” (Value Based Management.net 2011). A high MVA is better because it shows that the firm has added significant wealth to the owners. Conversely, a low MVA implies that the significance of investments and management’s actions are not more than firm’s capital as measured by capital market, or it may mean that the firm’s value and wealth have been ruined (Value Based Management.net 2011). MVA is determined as follows:
MVA = Market Value of Equity – Book Value of Equity
Where:
Market value of Equity = share price x share issued
Table 2: MVA
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
$ million
$ million
$ million
$ million
$ million
Share price per share
90.60
93.66
56.99
44.67
72.56
Shares issued
814.89
814.89
814.89
814.89
814.89
Market value of Equity
73,829.45
76,323.03
46,440.84
36,401.34
59,128.75
Book value of Equity
12,883.00
10,824.00
8,740.00
6,087.00
8,883.00
Market Value Added
60,946
65,499
37,701
30,314
50,246
The firm’s MVA has been positive throughout the five years, with the highest increase being in 2010 at 73.73%, which was $65,499 million. In 2011, the value added by the firm reduced by 6.95% to $60,946. This implies that CAT has added significant wealth to the owners and that the firm will be able to add even more value to owners in the future based on stock market valuation.
Technical analysis
After exploring the firm’s earnings, dividends and management, it is vital to look at charts to establish whether the stock is good for investment. The price of CAT’s stock returned 1.6%, the highest figure in 52-week; this may show that the stock price will have to decrease before increasing, thus any type of investment must wait (Knight 2012). Nevertheless, it seems that CAT’s stock price has reached its ceiling just below $117. This is vital because once the ceiling is broken; the $117 level will be the price floor. Also if it is broken, the investors will possibly see the stock price go another range of 8% to 12% above $117 before any other weakness is experienced. Thus, in both long-term and short-term, CAT will be able to cultivate enough revenues for shareholders (Knight 2012).
CAT’s chart has shown an upward trend for the last two years. That is to say, since fourth quarter of 2010 and first quarter of 2011employees efforts resulted to the trend seen in the share price. The present trend also shows that the company is in the upward trend. This trend may be due to fact that CAT’s share price fell roughly by 42% all through the short-lived mini-bear market during the mid-2011. Some firms’ stocks have volatile stocks in times of weakness, which is vital for the long-range investors since equity markets repeatedly cycle between bulls and bear markets. This means it is advisable for investors to have stocks that are less volatile like CAT, during times of weakness (Knight 2012).
Additionally, CAT is presently in a superior growth stage and this makes it good for long-range investment. Thus, the firm’s stock price will keep on increasing each and every quarter as well as each and every year. A contrarian may not invest in CAT as it has a low probability of being below the 52-week high in the bull market. Since the firm’s stock will have to fight with the $117 level possibly for a long time or entire week. But with combination of its dividend history, high growth, increasing sales and net profit margins, lower volatility, as well as a rise in demand and supply, make CAT’s stock a wonderful long-range addition to the investor’s portfolio (Knight 2012).
Chart 4: Share price
For the last two years CAT’s stock had a higher share price than competitors, mainly the Komatsu Ltd (KMTUY.PK), and the industry in general as measured by S&P 500 (GSPC). CAT’s stock shows the same trend as the market, meaning it moved in the same direction as the market, this shows that there may be a strong correlation between the market and CAT’s stock as shown by Chart 5.
Chart 5: Comparison
Valuation
Valuation of businesses has turned out to be an intrinsic component of a corporate landscape which has experienced dynamic changes over the past few years; it encompasses “corporate restructurings, share repurchases and merger and acquisition which are taking place in big numbers all over the world” (Secondventure.com 2011). At the centre of these activities stands several perception of valuation. Valuation techniques are not just used in accounting but they are used to provide cue to the investors, corporate acquirers, and venture capitalists to identify the real value of the firm’s assets. These valuation techniques may include, Discounted Cash Flow, Net Asset Value and Price/Earnings (P/E) multiple or ratio (Secondventure.com 2011).
Net Asset Value
In finance, any items owned by a firm or entity and individual are assets with financial value that can be converted to cash. The firm may owe creditors some money, which it has to pay. NAV is the value obtained after deducting liabilities from assets. If the firm has more assets than liabilities it is deemed to be solvent as its NAV is positive, while the one with more liabilities than the assets is deemed to be insolvent (Sify Finance 2008).
Firm’s NAV also termed as Shareholders’ value, does not essentially equate to sales price. NAV considers both tangible and non intangible assets such as goodwill that will influence the firm’s future earnings. If a firm holds a patent that promises revenue increase considerably, it will validate sales price higher than firm’s book value. In case the products’ demand is decreasing in the market, the firm may sell the products at a lower price than NAV (Sify Finance 2008).
NAV is calculated as follows:
NAV = Total Assets – Total liabilities
NAV per share = $13,402 million / 814,894,624
= $16.45 per share
Table 3: NAV
$ millions
Current assets
38,128
Non-current assets
43,318
Total Assets
81,446
Current liabilities
28,561
Non-current liabilities
39,483
Total Liabilities
68,044
NAV
13,402
Currently the CAT’s stock is trading at $116 compared with NAV of $16.45 we can say that the NAV and the share price are not the same. In general, the stock is selling at a higher price than NAV, which is termed as premium amounting to $99.45 ($116 – $16.45 = $99.45). We can also say that market capitalization ($75.11 billion) of the firm is higher than the NAV, this may be due to the fact that assets and liabilities uses historical prices and the investors believe that the firm is worth more and are thus prepared to part with more cash than its NAV. Since the share price is higher than the NAV one can conclude that CAT has high value and it is selling at a premium. Thus, the firm is profitable as a going concern and it will continue to function as such by improving the owners’ value through more cash flows from operations.
Price/Earnings (P/E) Multiple
P/E is a valuation technique that offers a benchmark for business valuation. It is possibly the most broadly used technique as well as the most widely misused investing metric. The multiple is very easy to determine and that explains why it is popular. It can be determined as follows:
P/E ratio = Share price / EPS or P/E = market capitalization / net income
P/E ratio can be multiplied by net income to determine the business value. The EPS is normally the trailing EPS for twelve months (TTM) and any P/E determined using TTM is frequently termed, as current P/E. P/E can also be a forward P/E that can be determined using analyst predicted earnings instead of the historical earnings. On January 31, 2012 the firm’s stock closed the day at $109.12 and its EPS (TTM) was $7.40. The management announced an average EPS guidance of $9.25 while the analysts as shown by Table 1 predicted that the firm’s EPS for the year 2012 will be $9.51. We can make use of the average between the two EPS estimates of $9.38 ($9.25 + $9.51 = $9.38) in order to determine forward P/E.
Current P/E (on January 31) = $109.12/ $7.40 = x14.75
Current P/E (on February 24) = $116/ $7.40 = x15.68
To determine the forward P/E we need to estimate share price after one year.
Share price = P/E x EPS (forward)
CNBC (2012) predicts that forward P/E will be x12.1 and analyst Merola (2012) predicts that forward P/E will be x12 thus the average of the two is x12.05
Share price = 12.05 x $9.25 = $111.46
Forward P/E (2012) = $111.46/ $9.38 = x11.88
Projected net income = $9.25 x 814.89 = $7,537.73 million
Firm’s value = $7,537.73 million x 11.88 = $89,548.23 million
Value per share = $89,548.23 million / 814.89
=$109.89 per share
Based on the calculated value of P/E multiple it can be noted that the current P/E on January 31 and February 24 are 14.75 and 15.68 respectively. This implies that the investors or the market was to part with 14.75 and 15.68 times firm’s 2011 earnings on those particular days. It also implies that the investors on January 31 and February 24 will take 14.75 and 15.68 years respectively to recover their earnings from firm’s 2011 earnings. The Forward P/E multiple of 11.88 means that the investors will take 11.88 years to recover their initial investment based on the estimated earnings of the year 2012. Also the investor will be expected to part with approximately $109.89 per share for firm’s earnings after one year. The Forward P/E is lower than the current P/E because the EPS is expected to increase from its current figure of $7.40 by approximately 26.76%. The firm’s value after one year will be $109.89.
Discounted Cash Flow
DCF uses Free Cash Flow (FCF) to determine the present value of cash flow by discounting them using discount rate. It is deemed as a strong measure because it focuses on generation of cash by the firm. DCF is vital when making a comparison or evaluating businesses. Ceteris Paribus, the investment or action with high DCF is the best investment to undertake (Macabacus 2012).
The discounting rate used to discount the cash flow is the shareholders’ required return, which can be determined using Gordon Growth Model also known as Dividend Growth Model (Macabacus 2012). The cost of equity or required rate is determined as follows:
k = D1 / MV + g
Where:
k = cost of equity
D1 = dividend to be paid next year
MV = stock’s market value
g = growth rate of dividends (6.06%)
k = $1.909 / 109.12 + 6.06% = 7.81%
In 2012, CAT plans to use $4 billion as Capital Expenditure. The capital expenditure will be subtracted from operating cash flows in order to determine FCF. It also expects to earn revenue of $70 billion and return to investors approximately $9.25 for every share invested in the firm. Thus, the cash flow for 2012 will be calculated as follows:
Table 4: Free Cash Flow
Year
2012
$ million
Net income ($9.25 x 814.89 million shares)
7,537.73
Operating Cash flow
Net income
7,537.73
Add back depreciation and amortization
2,667.00
Operating Cash flow
10,204.73
Less Capital Expenditure
4,000.00
Free Cash Flow
6,204.73
Since the firm is a going concern, this means that it will continue to perpetuity, and to determine a perpetual value of the firm, the FCF is dividend by cost of equity as follows,
Value of the firm = FCF / Cost of equity
= $6,204.73 million / 7.81%
= $79,445.97 million
Value per share = $79,445.97 million / 814.89 million
= $97.49 per share
Based on DCF value the firm’s stock is overpriced compared with February 24 and January 31 share price of $116 and $109.12 respectively.
Gordon (Dividend) Growth model
This model values the firm’s stock using dividend yield. It uses the current dividend and dividend growth pattern to determine the stock value, thus making it a fundamental analysis technique. However, the model presumes that dividends have a constant growth (perpetuity) which is not the case (Wang 2009).
P = D1 / (k – g)
Where:
P = share value
k= 7.81% and g = 6.06%
P = 1.909 / (7.81% – 6.06%)
= $109.09 per share
Therefore, the firm’s stock is overpriced when compared with its current price of $116 as at February 24 and when compared with $109.12 as at January 31, 2012.
Reconciliation
The valuation techniques display different values of the firm’s share. This means that in order to determine an approximate value of the firm we may need to reconcile these figures. This can be done by using weights, for instant the one that is more realistic is given more weight while the one, which seems to be unrealistic is allocated less weight. Take for instance NAV uses historical information to report liabilities and assets compared with the rest of the measures, P/E ratio, DCF and Gordon Growth Model, which are forward looking. Therefore, for the purpose of this evaluation NAV will not be considered since it is a past performance measure. Therefore, we are only going to consider DCF, Forward P/E multiple and Gordon Growth and assume equal weighting.
Combined value Vc = (Forward P/E ratio x 33.33%) + (DCF x 33.33%) + (Gordon Model x 33.33%)
Vc = $109.89 x 33.33% + $97.49 x 33.33% + $109.09 x 33.33%
= $105.48 per share
Therefore, combined value shows that the firm’s stock is overpriced at $116 and $109.12 per share on February 24 and January 31, 2012 respectively.
Market competition from John Deer & Company
CAT has several competitors in almost all the business segments it operates. Its main competitor across the entire zones includes mainly the John Deer & Company, CNH Global N.V, Komatsu ltd, and AB Volvo Construction Company. These companies deal with specialities offered by the principal rival CAT. Thought CAT has been dominating this industry for over a century now, this is the entire period of 175 year since John Deer inception. In fact, competitors have been lagging behind in almost all facets of their business sectors. However, John Deer Company is currently in hot pursuit, the company is restructuring its services by formulation of ways to help it attract more investors who will be expected to drive it into higher heights. This posse a real threat to CAT because other companies are also finding ways of controlling the market share in agriculture and forestry equipments, when these forces are combined the aftermath would be too strong for CAT to bear despite its current take in market share that largely depends on its historical perception and investments. John Deer Company has strong ties in the business most developing industries are using their building products are loyal to their brand items, which they have continued to cherish to-date. This is the main strength and driving force for its competitiveness. Competition within the industry has made these two adopt new novel scientific approaches to expand their market share and even gain advantage against their competitors. Some of the issues that make the brand competitive include durability of their products with easily available spares across the globe at an affordable price. This has given the company an upper hand in taking a competitive lead in the market share close to CAT (Alpha 2011). However, John Deer has a strong mechanism of maximizing the shareholders value; this is partly attributed to its resourceful human resource. This gives it a competitive advantage that translates into creation of superior values. However, their main strength lies with their ability to maintain debts levels, which they consider a prudent approach based on their cash flow, interest coverage ratios, and percent of debt to capital. John Deer uses debt financial information in lowering its capital cost. This has a positive effect of increasing their returns on shareowners’ equity. The aftermath is an exposure of the company to adverse rates of interest change. Replication of these approaches across its entire operating zones has seen it acquire more wealth and attract more investors year-in year-out.
Net asset value evaluation
Evaluation of its Net Asset Value (NAV) gives a more inferior value than what is available in the CAT. The current Value per share = $467 million earns every shareholder up to $ 1.52 per share this is an increase from $ 1.16 for the 2010 financial year. Though this is far less than the scenario in the CAT the entire figure translates to a more net gain when compounded together with values from other competitors (Sify finance 2008).
The firm’s market capitalization stands at a range of $30.3 to $35.4 billion. When this is compared with NAV of $76 Billion for CAT, the NAV is lower than the market capitalization by $ 20 billion, this is as a result the present value of assets which is different from figures in the balance sheet for determining the NAV, these also depends on historical perception. This NAV shows Deer current liabilities and assets position. This trend is similar to the situation at CAT where an investor may deem that the firm has a sound progressive growth potential, this paves the road for these clients to be in a position of injecting more cash than for its NAV. Since both the market capitalization and NAV is higher in CAT than Deer, then CAT is more profitable and can be able to survive in the future. This does not rule out the progressive nature of Deer as shown above from the past ten years financial data (Alpha 2011; Sify finance 2008).
Chart 6; showing a ten year financial status quo for CAT and DE (John Deer)
Market debt equity:
Debts to equity ratio (DER)
Debt to equity = Long term (LT) debts + Current portion of the (LT) debt / Total Shareholder Equity.
DER = leverage ratio that indicates proportions of shareholders equity as well as debts that the firm used in financing its assets.
DER = (52,980,000 + 53,673,112)/102,702,301
= 1.038
Maximum DER ratio for the past 10 years = 1.7753
Minimum DER ratio for the past 10 years = 0.8025
Analysis of the past 10 years DER shows that shareholders did not claim the assets of the company and this is the reason why the ratio of debts to equity is has gone up. This means that the Company is aggressively financing its growth from debts, which brings about volatile returns to its shareholders currently standing at $ 1.52 per shares. The company acquires less assets, the shareholding dragged their feet in making big money investments because annual selling of shares ensures the ratio to be high (Alpha 2011). Contrary, when this ratio is low then it means that the firm is using its resources to pay debts and therefore little returns to shareholders. In the past 12 months, the scenario is not very different even though the current figure is the highest. This does not mean there any change in its front (Wang 2009).
Price/earnings ratio
P/E ratio = Share price per share/ Earnings per share (EPS)
In this context EPS ratio indicates the amount shareholders expect to generate as earnings for every share invested in the Deer Company. From this it would be possible to assess the profitability of the company on a per share basis (Finance yahoo, DE 2012). The Deer has been having unpredicted growth for the past 10 years as shown in the figure below. Prediction is that the firm EPS will grow by 15.2%, for this case let us take the average growth of 50% which is a likely phenomenon with Deer 50 % [(15.2% + 34.8%)/2 = 50%]. Thus, the firm’s EPS for the 2012 beyond March will be $0.44 ($1.52 x 30.2%=$10.11). This means that for every share invested in the Deer Company, will generate $10.11 of the firm’s earnings. Also based on CNBC (2012) the forward looking P/E is x 6.7 this means that the share price after one year most probably in March, will be around $67.74 (10.11 x 6.7 = $67.74). This shows a positive trend of Deer in its shareholding business (Finance yahoo, DE 2012).
Chart 7: PE values for Deere Company
Forward P/E ratio = $67.74 / $1.52
= x6.70
While using trailing EPS of $3.49 and share price as at March 18th 2012 of $1.52, the trailing P/E ratio will be 18.96 times ($1.52/$3.49= 0.4355).
The firm’s trailing P/E multiple indicates that Deer company stock, at a share price of $48.95, was dealing at 0.4355 times the firm’s net EPS of $3.49. While the forward P/E multiple indicates that at a price of about $67.74 the firm will be dealing at x6.7 the company’s net EPS of $1.52. This implies that an investor would be parting with $ 0.4355 or $6.7 for each dollar on John Deer earnings.
When these two rival companies are compared with their competitors in forestry and agricultural segment with market capitalization of more than $40 billion it is true that both Deer and CAT has a high P/E ratio. A share with superior P/E ratio proposes to the investors that they should anticipating superior returns growth compared with the general market, this is the reason most investors put their cash for today’s returns in expectation of an increase in future earnings. CAT Company tends to attract more investors than the Deer because it has strong mechanisms of evaluating risks for their assets in the market. Therefore, these shares are referred to as growth stocks. On the other hand, a share having low P/E proposes that the investors have reserved anticipations for returns increase in future compared with the general market. Therefore, both CAT and Deer can be classified as growth stock and can only attract growth investors who view such a stock as an attractive buy (Wang 2009).
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
John Deer value has been on an upward trend for the past decade as shown by the PE figure above. Financial records show that the net profit value stands at figures that give more confident to the investors because their values keep gaining momentum with time, although the company have once or twice experienced volatile returns. Analysis of the unlevered free cash for the past 10 years gives a maximum of $459 million, while the terminal value at current financial year is $312 million. The discount rate is 1.9%, this shows a clear indication of the firm expected growth in the financial year 2012 in which its operating profit will increase by (6-12)% from $257 million to $890 million. If we assume the increase is by 12%, then the company can still increase its investments from savings from the production segments. Forecast of the past financial years cash flows is best attained by consideration of their changing trends and critical evaluation of factors attributed to these. Analysis of the cash flow to the firm shows that the capital expenditure, working capital, and D & A influence the business in a projected dimension. When these values are deducted from the total cash flows to obtain Free Cash Flow (FCF), the FCF is then discounted at the owners’ required return rate to obtain the equity value. Since the company has been on a progressive attempt in perpetuating, the value of equity will be represented as shown below:
Value of Equity = Free Cash Flow/Discount rate
Present value (PV) of perpetuity = FCF x 1/discount rate
PV = 425 million x (1/discount rate)
If we assume the total equity for 2007 was $358 million then the required return of 12% the firm will raise its share repurchase to more than almost 1 billion. This will raise the dividends to $2.17 for every share, which is an increase of 42%.
PV = 425 million x (1/12%)
= $3541 million
Value per share = $3541/1632
= $2.17 per share
The values obtained from the analysis indicate that the firm’s DER is struggling to catch CAT; its attempt in the shareholding is promising, they have mechanisms of helping investors predict any future volatility in their share earnings. This has build confident in investments, which is currently gaining momentum with time.
Conclusion
In general, CAT is in the growth stage, which makes it good for long-term investment. The firm has been performing well year-after-year with an increase in its earnings. The firm rewards its shareholders using dividends which increases every year and share repurchases, but currently it is not buying back any share even though it still has a repurchase program. Therefore, the firm’s share price will keep on increasing each and every time. From the valuation, the firm is overpriced which means that it is selling at a premium; thus, anyone willing to add value to his/her portfolio will not buy more of CAT’s stock rather one should aim to sell instead. On the other hand, an investor seeking a growth stock will go for CAT’s stock as it is promising more growth and an increase in shareholders’ value in the future. Therefore, growth investor may buy this stock for long-term investment expecting more share repurchases and more dividends.
Reference List
Alpha, S., 2011. Head to Head Battle: Caterpillar Inc. vs. Deere & Company. Web.
Bern, M., 2012. Caterpillar still has room to grow. Web.
Caterpillar, 2012. Caterpillar: Stock Information: Dividend History. Web.
CNBC. CNBC: Caterpillar Inc 2012. Web.
Dividend.com, 2012. Dividend.com: Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Web.
Dividend Monk, 2011. Dividend Monk: The 5 largest dividend holdings of the Gates Foundation. Web.
The article “Who’s In Charge Here? How Changes in Corporate Finance Are Shaping Corporate Governance” by M. Blair is an analysis of how the corporate changes of 1980s were shaping corporate governance. The article begins by noting how corporate leaders were being involved in big spending during the 1980s. Most of this spending was directed towards takeovers and other such projects. The result of this development was that by 1990, most companies were already dealing with bad debts. The article continues to note that the only reason the issue of corporate debts began being addressed was because of the recession. Some of the companies that previously had bad debts have since managed to overturn their situation.
According to the article, this situation has been made worse by the fact that most of those running these companies are not shareholders. In cases where there are disputes between managers and shareholders, the managers are more likely to emerge victorious (Blair 1991). The author of the article also cites the complexities involved in corporate restructuring process. The corporate governance trends of the period before 1980 are also covered. During this period, there was little correlation between corporate governance and corporate finance. This meant that managers encountered little interference from shareholders. In the 1930s, most corporations were run by their founders and this meant that these owners were in charge of their corporations’ governance. The article also explores the current state of corporate debts. It is important to note that corporate governance policies are best tested in bad economic times. Corporate debt in this case is not a solution to wealth generation for corporations. Like everything else, corporate financing by debt acquisition should be rationalized.
The article was authored during a period when the corporate world was grappling with a recession. The article is very informative in the manner that it chronicles the events leading to these developments. For instance, the author tracks the changes in corporate governance from 1900 to 1991. This chronology of events enables the reader to get a glimpse of the shapes corporate governance had earlier assumed. The analysis of corporate governance when Carnegie and J P Morgan were still active was particularly refreshing.
Another strong point of this article is the consideration it gives to both shareholders and corporate managers when adjudicating the addressed issues. The managers are said to be the ones currently wielding corporate power. It is noted that even courts tend to favor managers over shareholders (Blair 1991). This claim is not a castigation of the managers because the article goes on justify them. According to the article, shareholders always end up benefiting from good corporate financial decisions. This balanced outlook adds to the credibility of the article.
The article predicts that the level of corporate debt is likely to decline. This prediction is attributed to the rising costs of credit. This prediction might be inaccurate. This is because the effects of bad debts only surface in tough economic times. Therefore, as soon as the economy stabilizes corporations are likely to revert to their borrowing ways. It is therefore inaccurate for the author to assume that this trend is likely to change in a big way.
The article is a well-researched piece that offers important insight into the circumstances surrounding corporate governance issues in the country. However, the importance of debts to corporate finance seems to have been overlooked by the author. These issues aside, the article manages to accomplish its goal of demystifying the issues surrounding corporate governance and finance.
Reference
Blair, M. (2007). Who’s In Charge Here? How Changes in Corporate Finance Are Shaping Corporate Governance. The Brookings Review, 9(4), 8-12.
Corporate finance is an essential element in the successful operation of an organization. Aside from the operational calculations and analytical capabilities it provides for the accounting department, it facilitates skills and knowledge applicable in many managerial practices. Specifically, it provides a basis for sound decision-making and contributes to the clarity of goals and objectives. One area of corporate finance that is essential for managers is the type of business ownership. Acknowledgment of advantages and disadvantages of each form may be crucial for achieving excellent performance and minimizing undesirable expenses.
Importance of Corporate Finance
Corporate finance is a highly specialized set of activities that allows for accurate and reliable evaluations of an organization’s financial performance and modeling of likely outcomes for ongoing projects. However, its influence can be traced beyond the strictly utilitarian domain. Basically, since corporate finance is meant to assist the decision-making process, understanding its fundamental principles is both important and desirable for everyone within the company who is expected to make decisions and substantiate them—in other words, all managers.
In the most basic terms, corporate finance is aimed at optimizing expenses and controlling profits in order to maximize the latter—in other words, assessing the spending and revenues of an organization (Ross, Drew, Walk, Westerfield, & Jordan, 2016). It can be said that at least a part of the responsibilities of all managers covers the described activity. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that those who show a comprehensive understanding of corporate finance will excel at their duties and achieve higher results. While there may be no apparent direct connection, all managerial decisions are eventually reflected on the company’s balance sheet. Thus, any given field, from human resource management to management of supplies, requires at least basic corporate finance awareness in order to yield superior results.
Another aspect required for successful managerial performance is the ability to provide a rationale for decisions. While it is certainly possible that certain managers possess enough experience to intuitively make the best decision, a significant part of their success depends on their ability to convince their subordinates and/or superiors of its feasibility. The easiest example of the justifying of necessary expenses by providing convincing evidence of eventual profits. In addition, reasonable explanation backed by approachable financial calculations may decrease employees’ reluctance to accept changes and, by extension, increase their involvement. In addition, a better understanding of financial nuances by employees can lead to a clearer understanding of goals and, by extension, increase overall organizational performance (Parkes, 2014).
Finally, a better understanding of corporate finance contributes to the leadership qualities of a manager through obtaining a clearer vision of the company’s goals and the ability to communicate this vision to the employees in a comprehensible way (Parkes, 2014).
Ownership Types of a Company
One of the most common types of ownership is a sole proprietorship: a form of ownership where the business is owned by a single individual in its entirety. This type is very popular as it requires dealing with very few formalities and legal regulations to establish and operate. It also offers the simplest taxation scheme because all business revenues are declared as the personal income of the owner and are therefore exempt from corporate income taxation (Krentzman, 2013). Most importantly, in a sole proprietorship, the owner is in charge of the business and has control of overall business operations. However, it should be noted that in this type of ownership, the proprietor has unlimited liability—that is, all obligations created during operation fall under the owner’s responsibility. This disadvantage makes sole proprietorship the riskiest option since all debts are paid from the personal funds of the owner. In addition, for this type of business, the funding options are limited to those available to individuals (personal loans and savings), which makes raising capital difficult (Krentzman, 2013).
Another type of ownership is a partnership, where several individuals operate the business together. Depending on the type of partnership, liabilities and profits are shared either according to an agreement (general partnership) or according to the characteristics of their investment (limited partnership). The advantages of a partnership are largely consistent with those of a sole proprietorship, with one notable exception—it offers more options for raising capital, thanks to the involvement of more personal funds and the option to add limited partners who could offer additional investment return for a share of the profit. However, general partners still have unlimited liabilities, which means they bear financial and legal risks. In addition, the extent of responsibilities and liabilities between partners is ultimately determined by the agreement, which, if improperly constructed, may lead to inconsistencies and disputes. In addition, on occasions when debts cannot be covered by one of the partners, they can be collected from the other general partners. Finally, this type of ownership is vulnerable in a situation where one of the partners dies or decides to withdraw from the partnership (Freeman & Freeman, 2015).
A corporation is a form of business owned by shareholders. It is distinct from the previous types in that it is an entity that essentially has its own liabilities separate from those of the shareholders. This fact constitutes the corporation’s biggest advantage—the corporation can act on its own in seeking funding and can become a target of legal action instead of its owners. Therefore, it is a much safer form of ownership. Besides, the rules for shareholder liability and transfer of ownership are clearly defined for a corporation (Viney, 2015). On the other hand, corporations are more tightly regulated and controlled by the authorities and are more complex to establish and operate. The profits of corporations are also more heavily taxed, and shareholders pay personal income taxes in addition to corporate tax (Krentzman, 2013).
A limited liability company is a form of ownership that attempts to alleviate the disadvantages of a corporation while retaining its advantages. Its owners have limited liability, pay fewer taxes, and can fully participate in the management process, which ensures the simplicity and flexibility of a partnership. However, it is still more complex and costly to establish than a partnership and has several regulation limitations (e.g., transition to a publicly-traded business).
Uncommon Forms
One of the less common forms of business ownership is cooperation, also known as a co-op. This form usually requires a common goal and commitment on the part of the participants. This type is largely informal and relies on the goodwill of the stakeholders (Mazzarol, Reboud, Limnios, & Clark, 2014). Its advantages include lack of restrictions, low cost of operation, and significant benefits if properly established.
A nonprofit (not-for-profit corporation) is another ownership type rarely used in business, primarily because it aims at fulfilling purposes other than the generation of profits (e.g., charity, education, or science). It offers advantages of tax exemptions for received funds and provides tax-deductible donations for donors (Vaughan & Arsneault, 2013). However, this form of ownership is only applicable to a limited number of organizations.
References
Freeman, S., & Freeman, J. (2015). Financial accounting: A practical approach. Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson.
Krentzman, H. (2013). Business management for profit essentials. Piscataway, NJ: Essentials.
Mazzarol, T., Reboud, S., Limnios, E. M., & Clark, D. (2014). Research handbook on sustainable co-operative enterprise: Case studies of organisational resilience in the co-operative business model. Perth, Australia: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Parkes, M. (2014). Business facilitation: An essential leadership skill for employee engagement. Leiscestershire, England: Matador.
Ross, S., Drew, M., Walk, A., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. (2016). Fundamentals of corporate finance. Canberra, Australia: McGraw-Hill.
Vaughan, S. K., & Arsneault, S. (2013). Managing nonprofit organizations in a policy world. Fullerton, CA: CQ Press.
Viney, C. (2015). Financial institutions, instruments and markets. Canberra, Australia: McGraw-Hill.
Intrinsic value is the apparent or computed value of an organization, including unmistakable and impalpable components, utilizing central examination. Additionally, called the genuine value, the intrinsic value might possibly be the equivalent as the current market value. When calculating intrinsic value, you take the difference between the stock’s current price and the option’s strike price, then multiply by the number of shares your options entitle you to buy.
Corporation valuation is a procedure and an arrangement of methods used to evaluate the financial value of a proprietor’s enthusiasm for a business. Valuation is utilized by money-related market members to decide the value they will pay or get to consummate the offer of a business. Notwithstanding evaluating the offering cost of a business, a similar valuation apparatuses are frequently utilized by business appraisers to determine debate identified with home and blessing tax collection, separate from suit, dispense business price tag among business assets, build up an equation for assessing the value of accomplices’ proprietorship enthusiasm for purchase offer understandings, and numerous different business and lawful purposes.
Three distinct methodologies are regularly utilized in business valuation: the salary approach, the asset-based methodology, and the market approach. Inside every one of these methodologies, there are different strategies for deciding the value of a business utilizing the meaning of value suitable for the examination task.
For the most part, the salary approach decides value by computing the net present value of the advantage stream produced by the business (discounted cash flow); the asset-based methodology decides value by including the total of the parts of the business (net asset value); and the market approach decides value by contrasting the subject organization with different organizations in a similar industry, of a similar size, or potentially inside a similar locale.
Free cash flow represents the cash an organization creates after cash outflows to help tasks and keep up its capital resources. In contrast to income or net wage, free cash flow is a proportion of benefit that bars the non-cash costs of the pay proclamation and incorporates spending on gear and resources and changes in working capital. Interest payments are avoided for the most part acknowledged meaning of free cash flow. Venture brokers and experts who need to assess an organization’s normal execution with various capital structures will utilize varieties of free cash flow like free cash flow for the firm and free cash flow to value, which are balanced for premium installments and borrowings.
Discounted cash flow is a valuation strategy used to gauge the engaging quality of an investment opportunity. A DCF examination utilizes future free cash flow projections and rebates them, utilizing a required yearly rate, to touch base at present esteem gauges. A present esteem gauge is then used to assess the potential for investment. In the event that the esteem touched base at through DCF examination is higher than the current expense of the investment.
I feel that companies care because when investing in common stocks, the goal is to purchase stocks that are undervalued and avoid stocks that are overvalued. Managers must understand how intrinsic value is estimated. First, managers need to know how alternative actions are likely to affect stock prices, and the models of intrinsic value that we cover help demonstrate the connection between managerial decisions and firm value. Second, managers should consider whether their stock is significantly undervalued or overvalued before making certain decisions. Two basic models are used to estimate intrinsic value: discounted dividend model and the corporate valuation model.
Common stocks are one of the types of securities that give the right to a certain part of the issuing company. Such stocks are issued by joint-stock companies and are freely available on the stock exchange most of the time. Holders of common stocks are entitled to receive income (dividends) and a number of other privileges. Payments to shareholders are made from the net profit of the company, namely from the funds that remain after the mandatory payments, repayment of operating expenses, obligations on tax payments, credit debts and so on.
A certain amount of common stocks are issued and sold at the time of creation of the joint-stock company, which allows attracting investment in the business (Smith, 2015). Those companies that already exist, but plan to develop further, may sell more common stocks or other types of securities – bonds or preferred shares (for example, goals are often achieved through additional issuance).
The discounted dividend model (DMM) is one of the basic models designed for business valuation. The main feature of DMM is that it can be used to predict (calculate) dividends for the future (Zhang & Liu, 2017). The terminal value of a stock for a certain period is calculated upon application of the model in order to determine the fair price of the asset using the discount rate.
The fair value of the share and equity of the company is determined by the future cash flows to the investor, taking into account the available yield alternatives. Therefore, the corporate valuation model involves identifying a schedule of projected cash benefits and quantifying the benefits and risks (Bancel & Mittoo, 2014). It also provides an assessment of the investor’s opportunity costs and alternative rate of return and discounting future benefits to the current time.
References
Bancel, F., & Mittoo, U. R. (2014). The gap between the theory and practice of corporate valuation: Survey of European experts. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26(4), 106-117.
Smith, E. L. (2015). Common stocks as long term investments. New York, NY: Pickle Partners Publishing.
Zhang, Z., & Liu, C. (2017). Moments of discounted dividend payments in a risk model with randomized dividend-decision times. Frontiers of Mathematics in China, 12(2), 493-513.
