Feminism: The Conversation Of Inequality And Political Change

Women have been faced with countless cruel forms of institutionalized discrimination throughout history and in all cultural settings. This is unquestionable and disgraceful truth. Feminism plays a role both within our individual and social environments. To me, the impact of feminism in my life is both positive and negative. In my option, feminism has started the conversation of inequality, it has created a path for political change, yet, it has been stigmatized as false, and degrading.

Firstly, feminism was the conversation starter for inequality between the sexes. The traditional roles of men and women have been a systemic issue from the beginning of time. The inequality goes far beyond the traditional roles; men went to work, while women stayed home, care for their children, and catered to housework. This way of life was once not questioned, even when women were the property of their husbands. Feminism was the movement that started to allow women to see themselves more than someone else’s property. Women questioned their roles within society and their self-identity. Whether people are fighting for the right to vote, reproduction rights, equal pay, the right to education, or any other women’s rights, feminism has created a platform to do so. It has created a force that allows women and supporters to have a voice. Today’s feminism movement is more diverse than ever. Feminism has become more attentive to the wider range of experiences of those oppressed by gender norms and stereotypes, including men, non-binary, and transgenders. This allows different dynamics, options, and others voices to be heard within the conversation of feminism. Although the feminist movement started before my time, it was the platform that introduced me to the topic and helped me form my ideas and identity. To sum up, feminism has been the conversation starter for the pioneers of feminism and for feminists today.

Not only has feminism started the conversation of inequality, but it has also inspired real change within the fabric of our society’s economic, political, and cultural environments. Feminism gave the movement the platform and motivation to create real change. This change includes the right to vote, greater access to education, more equitable pay, the right to initiate divorce proceedings, the right to access to contraceptives and abortion, and the right to own property. The comprehensive list of achievements that feminism has impacted all women’s lives one way or another. Comparing then and now, it is evident that feminism has changed our society epically politically, and culturally. The fact that we have courses dedicated to the topic speaks volumes. Such a thing was not available for other generations, such as my grandmothers. Growing up in my generation, sometimes I forget how women before me fought for basic human rights. Education about feminism has shown me the large strides women have achieved towards a more equalist society. In addition, feminism continues to show society its capability and its continued determination for change.

Despite the enormous positive outcomes of feminism, there are negative stereotypes that impact feminism. I remember growing up as a younger girl, trying to figure out what feminism meant to me was a battle. I grew up in a household with two sisters and my grandparents. We were consistently reminded that we all had the capability to do whatever we desired and being a female was celebrated. The belief in social, political, and economic equality of the sexes, and the idea to challenge the systemic inequalities women face daily was valued within my household. Being a feminist was something that naturally became a part of my identity. However, calling myself a feminist was something hard to proclaim publicly. How could I grow up in such an inclusive environment that celebrated feminism yet struggled to call myself one? Although women’s rights and equality are a movement supported by my family and me, it also comes with its stereotypes. Feminists are stereotypically known to hate men, be angry, are unattractive and not feminine, are all pro-choice, against religion, do not support stay-at-home moms, and can only be women. These were labels I didn’t identify as and the reason I had difficulty being vocal about feminism. The fixation that feminists are selfish, or anti-man ruins the reputation of feminists but more importantly is a distraction from the fundamental issues. The anti-man label is either a smear or a misunderstanding and strays away from the real purpose of feminism.

In conclusion, feminism has started the conversation of inequality, it has created a path for political change, however, it comes with a stigmatized ideology that is false and degrading. Feminism has made me recognized its significance. To me it is the essence of new beginnings, as it started the conversation, it is a symbol of significant change, and it is a movement that is still in need of development. Although feminism has had remarkable outcomes for women’s rights, I believe that there is still a need for change. Feminism has evolved over time and continues to do so. This is hopeful in itself since without evolution and change progress is impossible.

Morality in International Politics

Introduction

The aim of doing this essay is examining the following question; why in the Middle East has So Many Conflicts? And Classical realism theory can analyze the conflict that happens in there? And how? Answer this question is important because of understands the cases On the other hand analyzing theory, classical realism theory. My diction of this essay in the primarily analyzing the classical realism theory, However analyzing Some important main assumption in classical realism theory , and stretcher of this essay in thy first we analyzed realism about historical and some philosopher , after that we talking about Some important main assumption in realism theory like States are most important characters in world , That the international political system is anarchic, States balance against threats, Morality has no place in international politics and Value Relative over Absolute Gains elative gain then we talking about the conflicts in the Middle East and apply classical realism theory on some cases in Middle East and analyzing some conflicts by tis theory ,in the end we write Conclusion .

Classical Realism theory

The ancestry of realism as international relations, despite the fact that recognizing predecessors, gets down to genuine business with Machiavelli, proceeding onward to scholars of power and theological rationalists for raison, and coming full circle, in its initial current structures, with Hobbes’ Leviathan (1651) preceding proceeding with the trek into the present(Örmeci, 2010).Realism is a clear way to deal with worldwide relations, expressing that all countries are attempting to build their very own power, and those nations that figure out how to crowd control most productively will flourish, as they can undoubtedly obscure the accomplishments of less amazing countries. The hypothesis further expresses that a country’s chief intrigue ought to act naturally safeguarding and that persistently picking up power ought to dependably be a social, monetary, and political goal.( Peter,2015).Realism contains many sub- categories, for example, traditional Realism current Realism or neo- Realism, and auxiliary Realism alludes to reality, saying something the positive and negative qualities All things considered, authenticity underlines issues, for example, the agony of war, the delicacy of harmony, the endeavor at security and the dangers to survival. Under the pragmatist hypothesis, the fundamental thought processes incorporate national intrigue, national security and individual ,national power. The major fields which add to this territory incorporate financial matters, history and political theory.( Walt, 2010).The idea of Realism suggests that looking for an ethical high ground is an objective that administrations can’t generally accomplish and that double dealing and savagery can be exceptionally powerful apparatuses for propelling national interests. With country protection hoisted to the most noteworthy need, remaining ethically honorable according to universal associations can assume a lower priority in relation to implementing remote approach that will enhance the country’s worldwide stature. In present day times, (Nuruzzaman, 2006).In the control of global relations there are fighting general hypotheses or hypothetical points of view. Realism, otherwise called political Realism, is a perspective of global governmental issues that anxiety its focused and conflict side. Pragmatists consider the main on-screen characters in the global field to be states, which are worried about their very own security demonstration in quest for their very own national advantages, and battle for power. The negative side of the pragmatists’ accentuation on power and personal circumstance is frequently their wariness with respect to the pertinence of moral standards to relations among states. National legislative issues is the domain of power and law, though universal governmental issues, they once in a while guarantee, is a circle without equity, portrayed by dynamic or potential clash among states (Katagiri, 2018)

Some important main assumption in realism theory

States are most important characters in world governmental issues: states carry on as though they were normal, as in the survey their vital circumstances in light of their surroundings, and try to amplify expected additions; states seek after their interests which noticeably incorporate survival, instead of acting benevolently, anyway That states are the focal performing artists in worldwide legislative issues as opposed to people or global associations, The Realist hypothesis of universal relations affirms that states are the primary power players in worldwide governmental issues. Pragmatists react to the anarchic world framework by accepting a self-improvement principle, trusting they can depend on nobody however themselves for security (Joseph & Wight, 2010) That the international political system is anarchic: as there is no supranational expert that can authorize runs over the states, revolutionary framework, the fundamental intention of a state’s conduct is survival, which they find in relative terms; holding that the expanded security of one state will essentially prompt a decline in security of others. (Boucher, 1998) In this manner, states are compelled to always consider that others may have more power than them or are wanting to acquire control and are so compelled to do likewise, prompting rivalry and adjusting, disorder is the possibility that the world comes up short on any incomparable specialist or sovereign. In an anarchic state, there is no progressively prevalent, coercive power that can resolve debate, authorize law, or request the system of international politics. In international relations, anarchy is widely accepted as the starting point (Boucher, 1998) States balance against threats: balance of power, in global relations, the stance and strategy of a country or gathering of countries securing itself against another country or gathering of countries by coordinating its capacity against the intensity of the opposite side. States can seek after an arrangement of balance of intensity by expanding their very own capacity, as while taking part in a deadly implements race or in the focused securing of an area, That all states want control with the goal that they can guarantee their own self-conservation.( Zamora & Faris, 1995) Morality has no place in international politics: Realists are by and large suspicious about the pertinence of morality quality to universal governmental issues. This can lead them to guarantee that there is the wrong spot for profound quality in international relations, or that there is a strain between requests of morality quality and necessities of fruitful political activity, or that states have their very own profound quality that is not quite the same as standard morality quality, or that profound quality, whenever utilized by any means, is simply utilized instrumentally to legitimize states’ direct. A reasonable instance of the dismissal of moral standards in relations among states can be discovered, (Peter, 2015, p.3) Value Relative over Absolute Gains elative gain: In international relations, is the activities of states just in regard to control adjusts and without respect to different variables, for example, financial matters. In international relations, collaboration might be important to adjust control, yet worry for relative increases will constrain that participation because of the low nature of data about other states’ conduct and interests. Relative gain is identified with zero-entirety amusement, which expresses that riches can’t be extended and the main way a state can end up more extravagant is to take riches from another state (Neumann & Clark, 2016, p.99)

Conflicts in the Middle East

Now here we talk about the Middle East area. The Middle East is an inexactly characterized geographic district; the nations recorded are commonly viewed as a feature of the Middle East. These Middle East nations are a piece of the Asian mainland, except for Egypt, which is a piece of Africa, and the northwestern piece of Turkey , which is a piece of the European landmass, The Middle East’ is a term generally applied by western Europeans to the nations of south Asia and north A Africa, Pakistan, and India. Hence characterized it incorporates Cyprus, the Asian piece of Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, the nations of the Arabian landmass (Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait), and Egypt and Libya (.infoplease, n.d). After that Here we want analyze Middle East conflict by classical realism theory if you see owe of the main assumption in classical realism say That the international system is anarchic in that there is no focal government to manage the conduct of states on the world system, It system that contention is inescapable as states are anxious to boost their interests and furthermore reinforce their security system. (Boucher, 1998) And you can see when happened conflicts in the Middle East area doesn’t have any central government in order that make control this conflict, for example the Syrian Civil War The war, which started on 15 March 2011 with significant turmoil in Damascus and Aleppo, is being battled by a few groups: the Syrian Armed Forces and its universal partners, a free collusion of for the most part Sunni resistance rebel gatherings (counting the Free Syrian Army), Salafi jihadist gatherings (counting al-Nusra Front), the blended Kurdish-Arab Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) with various nations in the district and past being either legitimately included or offering help to some group (Iran, Russia, Turkey, the United States, just as others and this conflict until now is unceasing because the international system is anarchy as there is no supranational expert that can authorize runs over the states (BBC, 2019) However States balance against threats, balance of power, in global relations, the stance and strategy of a country or gathering of countries securing itself against another country or gathering of countries by coordinating its capacity against the intensity of the opposite side.That all states want control with the goal that they can guarantee their own self-conservation( Zamora & Faris, 1995). it is clear we can see in Middle East some state want got a power Iran and Saudi Arabia, conveying the standards of the Shi’a and Sunni strains of Islam, are occupied with a serious battle for power in the Middle East. Their wounding rivalry for strength, playing out predominantly in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen, has effectively influenced Israel and Arab nations however in 1998 in Iraq Iran conflict Saudi Arabia sported Iraq state in conflict with Iran because Iraq state in this time controlled by Sunni Arabia (Kirshner.2018). Another main assumption in classical realism theory about morality according realism theory Morality has no place in international politics Realists are by and large suspicious about the pertinence of morality quality to international governmental issues. This can lead them to guarantee that there is the wrong spot for profound quality in international relations, or that there is a strain between requests of morality quality and necessities of fruitful political activity Realists are by and large suspicious about the pertinence of morality quality to international governmental issues. This can lead them to guarantee that there is the wrong spot for profound quality in international relations, or that there is a strain between requests of morality quality and necessities of fruitful political activity (Peter, 2015, p.3) it is very Clare when in Syria Millions of customary individuals living in Syria have needed to escape from their homes to discover some place more secure to live. By December 2018 the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights recorded that 367,965 individuals had lost their lives, including in excess of 120,000 customary individuals who aren’t officers or intended to be associated with the battling. This figure does exclude individuals who are missing or who aren’t recorded however, so the real number is believed to be a lot higher, this conflict between deferent group until now is unceasing because Morality has no place in international politics (bbc.co.uk, 2019). then however in classical realism theory has another main assumption according realism theory Value Relative over Absolute Gains elative gain In international relations, is the activities of states just in regard to control adjusts and without respect to different variables, for example, financial matters. In international relations, collaboration might be important to adjust control, yet worry for relative increases will constrain that participation because of the low nature of data about other states’ conduct and interests(Neumann & Clark, 2016, p.99), everything in politic it is interests when YPG attack ISIS in Syria United Nation sported in 2014 until the ISIS group was a weak but after the Turkish state attract YPG the United Nation did not sported YPG because after the ISIS group was a weak American state doesn’t have interest with YPG

Conclusion

In this subject we have talked about the Middle East has So Many Conflicts? And how Classical realism theory can analyze the conflict that happens in there this essay we had talked about classical realism theory, then analyzed Some important main assumption in classical realism theory and analyzed one by one some main assumption that according classical realism States are most important characters in world, That the international political system is anarchic, States balance against threats, Morality has no place in international politics and Value Relative over Absolute Gains elative gain. However understand this theory is very important for analyzing and understand the international political and if someone want analyzed political cases in world they can use classical realism theory for understand defriend cases like this essay we applied classical realism theory on some conflict in the middle east like Syrian Civil War, when started on 15 March 2011 and the role Iran and Saudi Arabia some conflicts in the middle east for balancing of power in this region

The Morality Behind Each Vote

Since grade ten Civics, most Ontarian students are challenged with the moral implications of political choices, and possibly given some direction towards specific political views. It was taught that every vote counts, literally meaning each vote is counted once. In reality, each vote is actually quite insignificant. The final result of the election is determined based on what everyone votes on as a collective. Although one vote does not have any actual weight, the intentions behind it carry deep meaning. Each vote is made with definite opinion, but what if such an opinion had a moral counterpart? Now, voting becomes a debate of one’s morality. Often this is easily overlooked; morality is clouded by the emotions of the voter. To make a choice morally, the person must be responsible for knowledge on the election. Next, they must use said knowledge in a rational manner, and not fear dispute on their primary choice. Lastly, the person must have a positive intellectual virtue which correlates with moral attitude. October twenty-first, 2019, was my first voting experience, and the above three points are what I was considering prior to concluding on a decision for the 2019 Canadian federal elections.

Firstly, voter knowledge is crucial during an election, platforms for parties change every election, even if it is just a minor moral adjustment. I tried my best to stay up to date with my knowledge on electoral leaders’ debates, watching the debate which occurred on September eleventh, 2019. The topics covered in this debate are the economy, Indigenous issues, the environment and foreign policy. However, the current prime minister, Justin Trudeau, did not attend this debate. Perhaps some of my views are skewed by not having all of the leaders information on their platform. My personal moral obligation was to check each platform, and understand the difference between each. After looking through information, I decided that I most identified with the Green Party of Canada. The Green Party itself identifies with the big four candidates: temperance, justice, piety, and courage, which were all identified by Socrates as individual virtues. In other words, this party encompasses all of the aspects that are critical to bringing a positive change, since they are driven by moral obligation. To not appear subjective towards the Green Party, I also identified that the New Democratic Party (NDP) is also morally worthy of a vote. To conclude with the gathering of knowledge, I can positively, and morally state that I identify with two parties.

Next, I must argue that rationality is critical for registering and understanding the knowledge gained in part one. At a glance, rationality in a moral sense suggests that one should vote for the common good, rather than narrow self-interested views. In no way this is stating that one should vote based on their concept of the common good, it must be a justified belief that promotes the common good. The notion of common good must be interpreted from it’s meaning; the benefit or in the interest of all. Whichever conclusion I came to for the common good had to include a thought for everyone’s well-being and prosperity. Although even with defining common good through justification and reason, the definition will still appear to be subjective. Personally, I wanted to focus research on economic prosperity, health services, environmental conservation, foreign policies, and fair treatment in all aspects, regardless of personal economic standing. This is a very vague, and subjective outline of what I was considering as some of the topics which are part of the common good, but it is also justified with facts from the political party platforms. On this basis, my moral decision on whom to vote for is rational. After consideration, I once again came to the conclusion of the vote towards the Green Party, due to the leader’s plentiful credentials.

Finally, the last two points are tied together with one’s moral attitude. In an ideally moral situation, one’s moral attitude would be identified with the big four candidates. A person that has no prior biases on the elections, and their choice is not pre-chosen before going through the first two steps above, would have intellectual and moral virtue. Aristotle noted that virtue, whether it is intellectual or moral, comes with practice rather than instruction. Virtues are habits, it’s how one thinks and interprets everything, of all truths and ultimate good. Therefore, if one has predetermined views that are not based on virtue then their vote is essentially corrupt, perhaps they would even be considered ignorant to virtue. Personally, I see these types of voters as polluters of democracy, due to their subjective opinion there is a higher chance that more people will suffer from poor governance. I can admit that I held a bias view prior to this election, but once the time came to research I made sure to approach everything with an objective view. With this I can conclude that my intention for the election is nothing but morally justifiable.

The votes are in, the polls are counted, and the expectations of many are fulfilled rather than unsettled. If that is true, then where the elections predetermined choices prior to the actual vote of each individual? To understand this, I would have to seek the understanding of each voter’ knowledge of platforms, their ability to rationalize and seek a justified meaning of the common good, as well as, their intellectual and moral virtue. As for myself, knowing that my vote is insignificant in my conservative driven riding, I still went through with my beliefs. After casting my vote, I could not feel anything but relief, because I voted for what I truly and morally believe is right. Although my view is transcendent in my opinion, I will not be able to reach the ultimate truth and right. In the occasion that my choice was morally sufficient, perhaps morality in a political sense is unattainable in today’s world due to other higher weighing matters.

Contextual Factors that Influenced Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird

SEGREGATION

Slavery is the act or practice of owning slaves and making them work very hard without proper remuneration or appreciation. Slavery was abolished in 1890 however this led to segregation in the early and mid-twentieth century. Scout, the narrator is able to bring out the hardships the slaves go through during the trial of Tom Robinson. They are depicted as liars and criminals with no chance of being justifiably heard. “It just shows you, that Robinson was legally married, they say he kept himself clean, went to church and all that, but when it comes down to the line the veneer’s might thin. N***** always comes out in them.” (Page 265, Chapter, 25) The slaves that lived in the southern states of America often worked on the large cotton plantations or farms that populated preponderance of the area. Workers were unable to leave the property on which they worked on without permission from their ‘owner’. Furthermore, they were not free to make any decision of their own without their ‘owners’ approval. Ergo, they had no freedom whatsoever. Continuing from the segregation in the early and mid-twentieth century, segregation is the act or state of setting someone or something apart from others. More specifically to To Kill a Mockingbird, segregation was the practice of enforcing separation of different racial groups that are part of a country, community or establishment. “Thomas Jefferson once said that all men are created equal.” (Page 226, Chapter 20) However this was not evident in the book To Kill a Mockingbird in many cases. It can be deduced from To Kill a Mockingbird and other sources that the racial oppression escalated across United States at the time the book was written. “But there is one way in this country in which all men are created equal-there is one human institution that makes a pauper the equal of a Rockefeller, the stupid man the equal of an Einstein and the ignorant man the equal of any college president. That institution, gentlemen, is a court.” (Page 227, Chapter 20) It was suggested numerous times throughout the book that “[Maycomb’s] courts are the great levelers” (Page 227, Chapter 20) and that “Tom had a good chance of going free, or at least of having a new trial.” (Page 241, Chapter 23) This didn’t prove to be the case as people soon began to realize “Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella Ewell opened he mouth and screamed.” (Page 266, Chapter 25) It soon became apparent to characters from To Kill a Mockingbird like Scout and Jem that the segregation in the world was far worse than they thought. “[It’s] ugly, but those are the facts of life.” (Page 243, Chapter 23) Scout, whilst narrating, often observed that black people were kept separate from white people in many instances. For example, the black inhabitants of Maycomb lived in their own ‘quarter’, an area of housing estate that was generally put aside for black people. It can be reasoned that segregation often did not mean equality either. The housing black people occupied were usually rundown and the schools for black children were not very well equipped either, with many of the textbooks being second hand or out of date.

JIM CROW LAWS

The Jim Crow Laws were a selection of laws that supported the segregation of blacks and whites in many southern American states, having been referred to as early as the 1890s. These laws legalized and supported discrimination in such issues such as bank practices, voting systems and school and housing segregation. Examples of Jim Crow Laws in action include the physical segregation of public schools, public parks and beaches, and public transportation. It was also during this time that drinking fountains, restrooms, and restaurants were segregated, requiring ‘blacks’ to use separate facilities. One of the most notable moments in American history provided an example of Jim Crow Laws being disobeyed, when Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a Montgomery, Alabama city bust to a white man, as required the law at the time. Parks’ display of civil disobedience in 1955 spurned the Civil Rights Movement, leading activists into the Montgomery Bus Boycott. This was ultimately triumphant in desegregating bus transportation after a year’s worth of the group’s fervent efforts. Many times throughout the book Atticus contradicts himself when he said “[Maycomb’s] courts are the great levelers” (Page 227, Chapter 20) This proved to not be true as “Atticus had used every tool available to free men to save Tom Robinson, but in the secret courts of men’s hearts Atticus had no case.” (Page 266, Chapter 25) It soon became obvious that “Tom was a dead man the minute Mayella Ewell opened he mouth and screamed” (Page 266, Chapter 25) as “In our courts, when it’s a white man’s word against a black man’s, the white man always wins.” (Page 243, Chapter 23) Atticus strongly believed that “The one place where a man ought to get a square deal is in a court-room, be he any colour of the rainbow.” (Page 243, Chapter 23) The Jim Crow Laws did not state or go through how the precession of the court should be conducted nor come to any conclusions close to that therefore should not have been applied to the context of a trial. Unsurprisingly however, it still had a major effect on an outcome of a case where a black person was involved. “There’s something in our world that makes men lose their heads-they couldn’t be fair if they tried.”

AMERICAS’S SOUTH IN THE 1930’S

At the beginning of the 1930s, more than 15 million Americans were unemployed and at stakes of losing their homes. The president at the time, Herbert Hoover did not do much to alleviate the crisis. “Patience and self-reliance,” he argued, “were all Americans needed to get them through this passing incident in our national lives.” More specifically, Alabama, the state that “was full of Liquor Interests, Big Mules, steel companies, Republicans, professors, and other persons of no background” (Page 18, Chapter 2) was the seventh poorest state in the country. This isn’t surprising as the Great Depression as well as the Dust Bowl Drought hit Alabama quite substantially. Being in the south, Alabama also had laws that legalized the segregation of African Americans as well. From all the reasons above, it can be inferred that it was not a good time to be in Alabama, especially if you were colored. But in 1932, Americans elected a new president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who pledged to use the power of the federal government to make Americans’ lives better. The book is set between the summer of 1932 and Halloween night of 1935 which meant they were already through the worst part of the economic fluctuation. Scout even adds herself that there is a ‘vague optimism’ (Page 6, Chapter 1) for some people because they have been told that ‘they had nothing to fear but fear itself,’ (Page 6, Chapter 1) which happen to be the famous words of President Franklin Roosevelt.

KU KLUX KLAN

The Ku Klux Klan was one of the most (and still is) notorious racist groups originating from Pulaski, Tennessee in 1865 (after the civil war). The book To Kill a Mockingbird vividly pictures the memories of the Ku Klux Klan atrocities. At the time the book was set, the members of the KKK influenced local governments, trying to enforce the standards of their community as a legal guidance. The “Ku Klux got after some Catholics one time.” (Page 161, Chapter 15) and managed to take many lives with their other bombings, public lynching’s and attacks as well. Fortunately, they overall failed to make their community standards the everyday norm but continue to be a part of an extreme right wing movement protesting openly on America’s streets in spite of Atticus’ confidentially stating that “The Ku Klux’s gone, and it’ll never come back” (Page 162, Chapter 15) He thought that “Way back about nineteen twenty there was a Klan, but it was a political organization more than anything. (Page 161, Chapter 15)

As mentioned previously, the Ku Klux Klan bombed, publicly lynched and attacked innocent people just because the happened to not follow the strict regulations the Ku Klux Klan followed. In the novel, there was no direct presence of the lynching. However, the influence can be discerned. Historians broadly agree that lynching was a method of social and racial control which were meant to terrorize black Americans into submission, thus forcing them into an inferior racial caste position. It grew in popularity and soon became widely practiced in the southern states of America from around1877 to around 1950. In many cases, law enforcement officers abetted and aided the many mobs by leaving black inmate’s jail cell unguarded giving time for the mob to kill them before any legal defense or trial could even begin. A typical public lynching would typically involve false accusations, an arrest and the assembly of the lynch mob. Furthermore, lynching was frequently committed with public displays and drew large crows of white families. In the South, an estimated two or three blacks were lynched each week in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

THE GREAT DEPRESSION

The Great Depression is known as the worst economic downturn in the history of the industrialized world. At the end of the 1920s and just before the Great Depression, America boasted the largest economy in the whole world. The main cause/factor of the economic crisis was the stock market crash. Other factors included investing too much money intending to expand to its breaking point, rising bank loans, an agriculture crisis and higher interest rates. This meant that they were unable to fuel the expansion no longer which consequently made the slowdown inevitable. The economic downturn that lasted from 1929 to 1939 had varying amounts of after-math for different families. “The Cunningham’s are country folks, farmers, and the crash hit them the hardest” (Page 23, Chapter2) whilst “no economic fluctuations changed [the Ewells] status – people like the Ewells lived as guests of the county in prosperity as well as in depths of a depression.” (Page 187, Chapter 17) “Every town the size of Maycomb had families like the Ewells,” (Page 187, Chapter 17) “they lived behind the town garbage dump in what was once a Negro cabin” (Page 187, Chapter 17) and therefore did not have much to lose. Professional people such as Atticus “were poor because the farmers were poor.” (Page 23, Chapter 2) Scout described Maycomb as a place where “There was nowhere to go, nothing to buy, and no money to buy it with.” (Page 6, Chapter 1) This suggests that the Great Depression took quite a firm hold of Alabama especially. Scout later that there is a ‘vague optimism’ (Page 6, Chapter 1) for some because people have been told that ‘they had nothing to fear but fear itself,’ (Page 6, Chapter 1) which were undoubtedly the famous words of America’s 32nd president, Roosevelt.

HOOVERVILLES

Scout describes Maycomb as ‘a tired old town’ (Page 5, Chapter 1) that is very hot in the summer, making the day oppressive for black dogs and bony mules who are ‘hitched to Hoover carts.’ (Page 5, Chapter 1) This quote at first does not seem noteworthy but grasps quite a lot of meaning once properly understood. During the Great Depression, many people went unemployed and therefore lost their homes meaning they didn’t have anywhere to live. People who were homeless and/or extremely poor would go live in one of many shantytowns. These shantytowns were named Hoovervilles after the 31st American president, Herbert Hoover. The term was coined by Charles Michelson, publicity chief of the Democratic National Committee. As well as naming shantytowns after the president, people started to name other objects after Hoover as a way of derogating him. Herbert Hoover was widely blamed for the sudden onset due to ignoring signs of an economical crisis. Such examples of these items include ‘Hoover Blankets’ (newspaper to protect people from the cold and rain), ‘Hoover flags’ (pants with pockets turned inside out to show the lack of money) and ‘Hoover wagons’ (cars pulled by horses because owners simply could not afford to pay for gas). Hoovervilles, although not mentioned in To Kill a Mockingbird, is still indirectly connected to the novel. The very hot summers were probably referencing the dust bowl drought whereas the ‘bony mule’ is most likely referencing the Great Depression as it suggests that the owner of the mule does not have enough money to spare for the mule’s food. Additionally, the hoover cart refers to the Great Depression as well as the many Hoovervilles.

THE DUST BOWL DROUGHT

Of all droughts that have occurred in the United States, the consecutive droughts of the 1930s were widely considered to be the ‘drought of the record’ for the entire nation. The drought event of the 1930s is often referred to as if it was just one episode, but it was several disastrous events occurring in rapid succession that affected regions were not able to recover adequately before another drought began. Due to low crop prices ad high machinery costs, more submarginal lands were put into production. Farmers also started to abandon soil conservation practices. The drought eventually destroyed the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of small farmers. The term Dust Bowl was coined by an AP reporter, Robert Geiger in 1935. Geiger used it to describe the drought-affected south-central United States in the aftermath of numerous dust storms. Although the term ‘dust bowl’ technically refers to southeaster Colorado, the western third of Kansas, the northern two-thirds of the Texas Panhandle, the Oklahoma Panhandle and northeastern New Mexico, the Dust Bowl has come to symbolize the hardships of the entire nation during the 1930s. In the county of Maycomb, “rainy weather the streets turned to red slop.” (Page 5, Chapter 1) The fact that Maycomb does not have updated facilities, roads, and sidewalks illuminates the effects of the Depression and a lack of social progress. As well as this, the wizened and dusty summers most likely played a significant role in making the ground as grotty as Scout describes it as. Compared to a normal summer to the summer of the 1930s, “it was hotter then; a black dog suffered on a summer’s day; bony mules hitched to Hoover carts flicked flies in the sweltering shade of the live oaks on the square” (Page 5, Chapter 1)

HARPER LEE’S CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES

Harper Lee was born on the 28th of April in 1926 in Monroeville, Alabama. Alabama in many ways like Maycomb, the setting of To Kill a Mockingbird. Harper Lee’s father was a lawyer, just like Atticus Finch, the narrator and protagonist of the books father. Furthermore, Harper Lee drew the inspiration for the character Dill from her childhood friend and future novelist Truman Capote. It can be inferred that To Kill a Mockingbird was intended to portray not Harper Lee’s childhood home but rather a nonspecific Southern town. “People are people anywhere you put them,” she declared in an interview in 1961. Unsurprisingly, the book’s setting and characters were not the only aspects of the story shaped by events that legitimately occur in Lee’s childhood. Harper Lee insists that To Kill a Mockingbird was not autobiographical, but there is no denying parallels can be drawn between To Kill a Mockingbird and Lee’s very own life. When Lee was just five years old, nine young black men were accused of raping two white women near Alabama. After a series of prolonged, publicized and bitter trials, five of the nine young men were sentenced to illegitimately long jail sentences. “There’s something in our world that makes men lose their heads-they couldn’t be fair if they tried. In our courts, when it’s a white man’s word against a black man’s, the white man always wins.” It has been said by lawyers and American citizens alike that the sentences were motivated by racial prejudice. It was also surmised that the women who claimed to have been raped by the men were lying. Their claims became more dubious as the trials and appeals continued. Therefore, there can be little doubt that the Scottsboro Case served as a seed for the trial that stands at the heart of Lee’s novel. Calpurnia is so much more to the family than just the African American housekeeper she is. She acts as a mother figure to both Scout and Jem, as she practically raised them ever since their mother’s death. Along with Miss Maudie, Calpurnia is a strong, positive female influence in Jem & Scout’s lives. Inevitably, Lee had an African American housekeeper when she was a child and probably drew inspiration for the character Calpurnia from her household’s housekeeper.

REFERENCES

  1. To Kill a Mockingbird [novel]
  2. https://www.history.com/news/kkk-youth-recruitment-1920s [article]
  3. https://prezi.com/k7hufl8yeoht/segregation-prezi/ [prezi]
  4. https://prezi.com/kjhvtol8c9sv/a-walk-through-the-american-south-1930s/ [prezi]
  5. https://www.missedinhistory.com/tags/jim-crow-laws.htm [podcast]
  6. https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/segregation-united-states [article]
  7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws [website]
  8. https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/great-depression-history [article]
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression [website]
  10. https://livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/water_02.html [website]
  11. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/GreatDepression.html [articles]
  12. https://www.britannica.com/story/causes-of-the-great-depression [website]
  13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eGrjS2w5HQ
  14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redlining [website]
  15. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csv1bw [podcast]
  16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-rBhbkvtm0
  17. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/28/redlining-was-banned-50-years-ago-its-still-hurting-minorities-today/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c8683433eab0 [article]
  18. https://www.thebalance.com/definition-of-redlining-1798618 [website]
  19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooverville [website]
  20. https://mashable.com/2015/09/17/hoovervilles/ [website]
  21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k53rXMAbq3I
  22. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62DxELjuRec
  23. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ajn9g5Gsv98
  24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnNeH1aVHCM
  25. https://drought.unl.edu/dustbowl/Home.aspx [website]
  26. https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/dust-bowl [article]
  27. https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/never-30-vcstar/never-30/e/52239209?autoplay=true [podcast]
  28. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRiOCEaFr0U
  29. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChWXyeUTKg8

Social Skills And Moral Development Of Young Children

Self-concept can be described as the development of individual identity and how children see themselves as separate from others with unique personality traits. The ages are meant to be general so that movement from one stage to the next is individualized and largely dependent on each child’s development.

Emotional development in preschoolers is a balancing act between the need to learn and understand limits and the need for freedom and independence. Children at this age are beginning to understand that their actions have consequences, both good and bad. Sigmund Freud focuses on instincts and their role in pathology. The theory introduces the development of personality during childhood. With Freud’s theory, the mind can be divided into three main parts included id, ego, and superego. The id is the aspect of personality that is entirely unconscious and includes the instinctive and primitive behaviors. The id is the personality that is present from birth. The id is also the source of all psychic energy, making it the primary component of personality. While for the ego-personality, it was developed from the id and make sure that the impulses of the id can be expressed in a manner acceptable in the world. The ego functions in the conscious, preconscious and unconscious mind.

With the superego personality, according to Freud, this personality holds out all our internalized moral standards and ideals that we acquire from both parents and society (our sense of right and wrong). It provides guidelines for making the judgment. The superego begins to emerge at around age five.

With Piaget’s theory of stage development, the first one is sensory-motor which is developed below two years. The stage describes as it has the reflex base, coordinate reflexes with the key feature of the object permanence. The research study is with the blanket and ball. The second stage is preoperational which is developed by age two to seven years. This stage describes as self-oriented with its egocentrism of the key feature. The research study is with the three mountains. The next stage is concrete operational which develops at age seven to eleven years. This stage defines with more than one viewpoint, no abstract problems and considers some outcomes. Its key feature is conservation and the research study is conservation of number. For the last stage, it is formal operational which describe as children to think abstractly. This stage develops at the age of eleven years and above. The stage also describes as reason theoretically. Only some people can reach this stage accordingly. The key feature to manipulate the idea in the head and abstract with reasoning. The research study is a pendulum task.

Lawrence Kohlberg has greatly expanded Piaget’s work. Although Kohlberg’s theory had been very influential, it has limitations such as ignoring local, cultural, moral ideas and being disconnected between moral behavior and moral judgment. He proposed the six-stage sequence of moral judgment development.

There are three levels of moral stages. The first level is known as pre-convention morality. Each level has two-stage. For the first level, at stage one which is obedience and punishment. In this stage one, children see rules as fixed and absolute thus obeying the rules is important because it is meant to avoid punishment. The second stage consists of individualism and exchange. In this stage, children account for individual points of view and judge actions based on how they serve individual needs. In the Heinz dilemma, children argued that the best course of action was the choice that best-served Heinz’s needs. Reciprocity is possible at this point in moral development, but only if it serves one’s own interests.

For the second level which is conventional morality. At stage three, there are interpersonal relationships that referred to as the “good-boy-good girl” orientation. This stage of moral development is focused on living up to social expectations and roles. There is an emphasis on conformity, being “nice”, and consideration of how choices influence relationships. With stage four which consist maintaining social order, with how people consider society as a whole when making the judgment. The focus is on maintaining law and order by following the rules, doing one’s duty and respecting authority.

For the third level which is called post-convention morality. With stage five, there are social contracts and individual rights. This stage describes how people begin to account for the differing values, opinions, and beliefs of other people. Rules of law are important for maintaining a society, but numbers of society should agree upon these standards. The last stage which is stage six, which known as universal principles. This stage makes people tend to followed internalized principles of justice, even if they conflict with laws and rules.

While on the other hand, for Erikson’s theory of psycho-social development explores the history of personality psychology and explaining further about the impact of social experience across the whole lifespan of the preschoolers’ social-emotional development. There are eight stages of Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development. The first stage is the infancy stage which age birth to 18 months. In this stage, babies have a basic conflict with trust versus mistrust with the important events which is feeding. The strength developed during this stage is hope.

While for the early childhood stage, with age two to three years having a basic conflict with autonomy versus shame and doubt. The important events in this stage are toilet training and the strength developed is willpower. For the preschool stage, age three to five years, which the basic conflict is initiative versus guilt and the important events is exploration and the strength developed is the purpose. The school-age, age six to eleven years with conflict for industry versus inferiority. The important events which are school and the strength developed which competence.

For adolescence which age twelve to eighteen, having conflicts with identity versus role confusion, the important events which are social relationships and the strength developed fidelity. For young adulthood which age nineteen to forty, which conflict is intimacy versus isolation, the important events are relationships and the strength developed which is love.

For middle adulthood which is forty to sixty-five, which conflict is generativity versus stagnation, the important events are work and parenthood. The strength developed which is care. While for the maturity stage that age sixty-five to death which conflict is ego integrity versus despair. The important events which are a reflection on life and the strength developed are wisdom.

On the other side, Albert Bandura’s social learning theory adds to social elements. According to him, people can learn new information and behavior by watching other people. This can be called observational learning. Adding to that, there are three social learning concepts that people can learn through observation, mental stress is important to learning and learning does not necessarily lead to change in behavior.

Emotions correlate with the types of actions a child would portray. For example, a three-year-old toddler would have a huge tantrum when they have unable to build blocks, as to how they want it to be. Tantrums such as this would mellow down once the toddler is four years. The process that happens here is called emotional development when they start to understand and are able to process the feelings they are facing.

The Little Rascals save the day show is about children who want to save their grandma’s bakery. They are just ordinary children with their calling Spanky, Alfalfa, Darla, Buckwheat, Petey the dog. The children try anything to raise the money needed in order to save their grandma’s bakery. The only trouble is, they can’t seem to do anything right! From botched pet washes to terrible taxi service, they just can’t raise a penny. Their only hope is to win prize money from the local talent show, but have you ever heard Alfalfa sing?

According to Combs and Slaby, social development is the child’s ability to interact with their peers and others in a given social context in ways that are acceptable socially or valued. Therefore, children’s social development is influenced by the nature of the family, culture, school and the environment that they are in.

For example, in the show for The Little Rascals Save the Day, as the children know it is the last day of school before summer vacation, Spanky, Alfalfa, Mary Ann, and Stymie try to leave early by having Buckwheat and Porky tell Miss Crabtree that they need to go home. Miss Crabtree agrees to let the four kids go, forcing them out of her surprise ice cream cake party for the class.

Schools have different settings and have their own rules, limits, and standard for behavior. Their teacher teaches them their value of honesty, which if they lie, they get their own consequence. Another example is when the five children visit their grandma bakery and their grandma asks about how their last school day. It doesn’t matter how the child born into a nuclear, blended or single-parent family, the child will learn their social skills in the context. Children find love and security through attachment and bonding with people who protect and care for them. A socially competent parent would act as a model for the model. The children would portray the image of their parents interacting with others on their own to make friends. The nature of the child and parent relationship also influence their social development skills.

In the show The Little Rascals Save the Day, the children were shocked by the news that their grandma bakery about to lose cause of their grandmas debt. So then, Spanky suggests the other children get jobs in order to help save grandma’s bakery. The children tried hard their effort whatever possible way they can think about to save their grandma bakery. This can be related to the social development in which environmental plays the major part. In the show, the security, their grandma, their teacher, their school cook and other pedestrian giving some interaction to the children. Another point is researchers said that it is also important to take good nutrition for brain growth. It is important to take proper equal in healthy nutrition as this provides fuel for early childhood’s rapid brain growth. Without good nutrition, brain growth becomes slow, hence delaying cognitive, social and emotional development.

There are many studies grandma’s how children learn values. According to studies, children’s attitudes and values are fully formed by the age of seven but they are constantly changing as children grow. Studies suggest that attitudes and values are learned in much the same way that knowledge and skills are acquired. According to Bandura, children adopt the values and attitudes of those who close to them. Within the family, children learn and model their family’s social behaviors, norms and the culture along with the respective social conventions such as how to address the elders.

While behaviorists claim that children and adults learn their attitudes through reinforcement, thus teachers should be careful about what they reinforce as reinforcement is a consequence that could strengthen future behavior and is normally followed by a stimulus. On the other hand, the cognitive theory explains the formation of children’s attitudes is influenced by cognitive structures. Adding by that, theorists supported the idea that children learn by reasoning about moral and analyzing values. Children need a variety of social experiences such as engaging in disputes, conflicts, negotiation, uncertainties as well certainties to develop embryonic attempts to understand and the judgments and the positions of others and bring together these ideas with those of their families, school, and others.

The study suggests that value clarification is one way to help students chose their values freely while maintaining an open mind. Some examples of the value clarification technique that can be used by teachers in classrooms are teacher encourage students to make choice freely in child-initiated activities, teacher asks students to weigh alternative choices and the consequences of their actions thoughtfully, teachers encourage students to consider what they prize and cherish and teacher help children to act on their beliefs, giving opportunities for them to express to oppress their own ideas and develop repeated behaviors of patterns in their lives.

The personality of an individual can change due to many reasons, among them is time. As a person grows older there seems to be the consistency of traits, however, there is no definite date or age when one’s personality just suddenly stops changing. There are five basic core personalities or can be known as the big five. The big five give personality traits are extroversion, agreeableness, openness to experience or intellect, conscientiousness and neuroticism.

The personality trait for extraversion is described as sociable, expressive, high-spirited, lively, socially potent, physically active and energetic. They are energized by activities, people and places that seem to apply to preschoolers as well which is a highly positive effect, energy and zestful engagement and eager anticipation of enjoyable events.

It is important not to confuse extraverted with sociability. An extraverted child would want to share all their ideas and experiences with people immediately. An extravert child is also known to always interrupt when someone speaking and not listening to one instruction. They are also known to think and talk at the same time as talking aloud seems to help them think. Extrovert children might not necessarily be able to vocalize their feelings which they will readily express through actions and body language.

In the show The Little Rascal Save The Day, there is one character that has one of the personality traits which is extraversion. The character is famously well known as Alfalfa Switzer. Alfalfa recognized by his trademark cowlick and freckles, Alfalfa Switzer has the character with full of pride, self-assurance, and self-esteem with quite a little eye for the ladies; however, there is one thing that can knock him back to reality is Butch, who often makes him the victim of many cruel pranks and threats.

Alfalfa has a personality with extroversion which he is always active in club activities with his other members. He is the best friend of Spanky, a leader and role model for Porky and Buckwheat and the number one pursuer of love from Darla. Alfalfa has good talent in singing and has to perform on stage at a talent show. However, Alfalfa has become friends with Spanky long before his performance. Sometimes, Alfalfa singing in the Spanky tree house show.

Knowing the shocking news about their grandma bakery were in debt, Alfalfa and his other friends making some plans in which Porky, Buckwheat, Mary Ann and Stymie are offered their services in professional working environments, Alfalfa and Spanky become golf caddies. Then, his friends, Spanky doesn’t stop there, he recommends with their friends to do a pet washing business. Alfalfa tried to make things right by offering Darla a ride to the library on the bicycle, but she instead decides to go with Waldo in his toy car. The first one is the personality in which in the dimension of conscientiousness. In which conscientiousness describes children who are focused on their task at hand and are responsible children. They are very persistent and do not give up on whatever they do. In an instance, Alfalfa and other the Little Rascal try to save their grandma bakery with their busy activities such as offering professional services, become golf caddies, pet washing business and a wrestling match. Coincidentally, this makes their personality extraversion as they active socially with the society which includes around their school, neighborhood and other children who make an offer on their business service.

Alfalfa is also having the personality dimension of agreeables which in this case he shows his affection toward Darla in many situations. He also shows his trust toward his best friend, Spanky to do all the decisions regarding their business to save their grandma bakery. Alfalfa also shows kindness toward his other friends and along with their grandma. In many cases, Alfalfa and other Little Rascal having pro-social tendencies such as empathy, considerate and helpful differ in themselves however all demonstrate for other people rather than interest-only at themselves.

There is one situation in which Alfalfa and other Little Rascal angered at their leader’s poor decision and his bossy attitude, Spanky, then Alfalfa and other gang turn against Spanky, but after a talk with grandma, Spanky is able to recognize his friendship with the others. This makes the children a neurotic-ism. Neurotic-ism describes children and adolescents as anxious, vulnerable, tense, easily frightened, ‘falling apart’ under stress, guilt-prone, low in frustration tolerance and insecure in relationships with others. Neurotic individuals tend to criticize themselves and are insecure. They are also sensitive to criticism and teasing. With neurotic-ism, children tend to view themselves and the world through a negative lens.

To conclude this, children who are motivated and successful in school tend to have high self-esteem and self-concept compared to children with poor achievements. Each child has their own unique personality develops from an early age. The same as socio-emotional development begins right from the time they were born and continue throughout their lifespan. In young children, morality forms through their experiences at home, the environment around them and their physical, cognitive, emotional and social skills which influence their developing sense of right versus wrong. Parents should pay attention to the child’s personality development which has an impact on the social experience. Children learn to manage their behavior from guidance, discipline, and punishment which behavior development related to emotional development. While on the other hand, the show The Little Rascal Save the Day is about children who want to save their grandma’s bakery in ways socially acceptable possible. Social skills and moral development of children are influenced by the nature of the family, cultural factors, school environment, and outside factors. The show of The Little Rascal Saves the Day which showcases each character’s unique personality dimension.

Rene Descartes Contribution To Mathematics

Mathematics is a very broad topic and has a lot of different topics, some of which you may not even know is related to mathematics. Rene Descartes is a very big part of the mathematical world, and he made many big contributions that changed the way mathematics is looked at today. Although some people might think of Descartes as a philosopher more than a mathematician, that is not true in any sense he made many contributions both to physics and mathematics, some of the areas he affected the most are geometry and calculus. Rene Descartes was a very intelligent man who was able to influence and impact many different aspects of the world and still have an impact on us today.

First I will start out with the basics about Rene Descartes, Rene was a French philosopher and mathematician who made many outstanding discoveries in the field. Rene Descartes was born on March 31st in 1596 in France and he died at the age of 53 on February 11th, 1650 in Stockholm, Sweden. Descartes had a sister and two brothers, and his mother passed away at a very young age, later in life he had a daughter as well. Early on in his life, his father sent Rene and his siblings to live with their grandmother. Descartes would then go on to attend the boarding school Jesuit college of Henri IV, and later on in life would attend the University of Poitiers. Over the span of his career, he managed to be named a mathematician, a scientist, and a philosopher, as he was able to impact all of those fields with his findings.

One of the more outstanding feats that Rene Descartes was able to achieve during his time of being a mathematician was being able to discover the Cartesian Coordinates. This is something that everyone has used during some part of their life, whether it be in middle school or in college you have used this in a math class at some point. The Cartesian Coordinates is basically graphing a point on a grid, and you are able to graph that point because it has a location that is described by a vertical and horizontal number, for example (3,2) these numbers make it unique to where the location of the point is. In the article 17th Century Mathematicians- Descartes it states “He used perpendicular lines (or axes), crossing at a point called the origin, to measure the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) locations, both positive and negative, thus effectively dividing the plane up into four quadrants.”(17th Century Mathematicians- Descartes). This describes how the grid is split up, it is divided into four sections, which determine whether the point is positive or negative. All points are based on the origin, which is (0,0) on the plane. Not only are you able to plot points on the plane, but you can also graph lines or shapes, which are represented by equations. For example in the article 17th Century Mathematicians- Descartes it states “y = x yields a straight line linking together the points (0,0), (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), etc. The equation y = 2x yields a straight line linking together the points (0,0), (1,2), (2,4), (3,6), etc.”(17th Century Mathematicians- Descartes). These are only some of the things that can be graphed on the Cartesian Coordinate Plane, there are numerous other equations that can be represented on the plane. Descartes made it possible to solve equations both graphically and algebraically, which is a huge accomplishment in the world of mathematics, I believe that this is possibly the most notable thing that Descartes was able to contribute to the world of mathematics, he changed the way we look at equations and graphing and made it much easier and less of a hassle.

It may seem like the discovery of the Cartesian Coordinate System would be Rene Descartes most significant accomplishment, but that is not necessarily the case. He also has helped in other areas of math too, one of the main areas being calculus. As stated by Anirudh in Rene Descartes 10 Major Accomplishments “Descartes developed his rule of signs, a technique for determining the number of positive or negative real roots of a polynomial.”(Anirudh). Descartes developed a rule to help distinguish what is positive and negative roots, this is useful in math where you have to use polynomials. These rules became important for future mathematicians who studied and did research in the field of calculus.

One of the many things that he was known for over his career would be his discoveries in philosophy. He was able to become the “Father of Modern Philosophy” with the outstanding findings he had in the field. The main thing that he was able to find in the field of philosophy was the idea of Mind-Body Dualism. This was basically being able to distinguish the differences between the physical being of the body and the mental state of the mind. In Gary Hatfield’s Encyclopedia, it states “He has merely relied on the fact that he can doubt the existence of matter to conclude that matter is distinct from the mind.”(Gary Hatfield). This is basically showing the mind and body are two separate beings, thus forming the basis of his philosophy.

Since I have only studied bits and pieces of things about Rene Descartes, I was unaware of many of the things that he has accomplished. There are a few things that I found to be the most notable things about Rene Descartes, his contributions to mathematics changed the way that we look at mathematics and solve problems. The main things that I found to be the most outstanding thing that he has done would be founding the Cartesian Coordinate Plane, this opened up a whole new way of solving equations, and made mathematics much more diverse. Another piece that is not talked much about in this essay would be his influence and findings in the field of philosophy as he is known to be the “Father of Modern Philosophy” he had many breakthrough findings in that field which would make him very notable in that field as well.

Rene Descartes was a very smart man as he made many discoveries in many different fields, some in math some not. One of these fields he happened to impact would be physics. Descartes would end up being one of the people who helped Isaac Newton develop the law of motion, he set some of the laws of motion prior to Isaac Newton. As stated by Anirudh in Rene Descartes 10 Major Accomplishments “His first law states “that each thing always remains in the same state; and consequently, when it is once moved, it always continues to move”(Anirudh). while his second law holds that “all movement is, of itself, along straight lines.” These two laws were Rene Descartes contribution to the law of motion. Not only did Descartes discover a part of the law of motion, but he discovered many other laws as well. Some of these laws include the law of reflection, the law of refraction, and part of the law of conservation of mechanical momentum. Rene Descartes was able to influence our society in many ways that I didn’t think were possible, when I looked at math I did not once think of Rene Descartes, after doing my research and seeing all the fields and areas of mathematics he was able to reach out and influence my view has changed.

Works Cited

  1. Anirudh. “Anirudh.” Learnodo Newtonic, 11 Sept. 2018, https://www.learnodo-newtonic.com/rene-descartes-contribution.
  2. Descartes – 17th Century Mathematics – The Story of Mathematics, https://www.storyofmathematics.com/17th_descartes.html.
  3. Hatfield, Gary. “René Descartes.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 16 Jan. 2014, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/descartes/.

Island Of Dr. Moreau And In The Picture Of Dorian Gray: Halloween Or A Victorian Novel?

While Wilde and Wells emphasize science as an underlying theme in their works, both authors use science to serve the bigger theme: gothic fiction, and to get the point across they use horror, suspense, and fear that is prevalent in the Victorian Age. In the Island of Dr.Moreau and in The Picture of Dorian Gray, both novels use different themes that are connected to the bigger theme of Gothic Horror. The term gothic novel typically refers to stories that combine elements from horror and romanticism, which often are represented in a psychological way. Gothic novels deal with supernatural events that are not easily explained and follow a plot of suspense and mystery. These novels written by Wilde and Wells perfectly represent the times they were written in- The Victorian Era. During the 18th and 19th Centuries there was a great sense of exploration and discovery in the fields of science, religion, and industry. These novels serve the purpose to explore the ideas that were common at the time. Therefore, both novels can be connected to the use of gothic horror in the Victorian Era.

An overlapping example between the two novels is the use of secrecy. In the Island of Dr. Moreau, it seems as everything is clouded in secrecy. The Island itself is a mystery. “Our establishment here contains a secret or so, is a kind of Bluebeard’s Chamber, in fact” (Wells 21). Here, there is a reference to a folktale where Bluebeard, a wealthy and powerful nobleman supposedly has many wives and, in each relationship, the wife suddenly disappears. In the Chamber, there is blood everywhere, the result of the murders, just as there appears to be plenty of blood on the island due to the different science experiments. The reference to Bluebeard’s chamber also foreshadows a bloody and horrific future death for Prendick. This foreshadowing is common in gothic novels, especially when the main character eventually dies an unexplained death. The weird scene portrayed by Wells can be connected to secrecy in the Picture of Dorian Gray. Just like the other novel, the main issue at hand is enthralled in secrecy. Dorian Gray is depicted as a beautiful young man with an ugly secret(GradesFixer). Dorian will retain the innocence of his youth but with every evil action he endures, his picture is degenerated. This secret of the picture is kept from other characters in the novel such as Sibyl Vane, James Vane, etc. Secrecy is also embedded in the romanticism displayed in the novel. The best example of secrecy is between the relationship of Dorian and Sibyl Vane. Here, Dorian falls in love not with her but rather the person she transforms in on stage. Before Sibyl reveals her true nature to Dorian, Dorian is intrigued and instantly falls in love with her and believes she is the direct product of a Shakespeare play. However, when she reveals her “secret”, her real identity to Dorian he is taken back. He says “You used to stir my imagination. Now you don’t even stir my curiosity” (Wilde 236). Dorian no longer has these fantasies about their relationship that was created by the secrecy of Sibyl’s true identity. Secrecy in death is a theme that coincides between the two novels(GradesFixer).In the Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorians ultimate downfall was when he kills himself. Trying to stab the painting to destruct his former sins and all his secret ones that outsiders do not know, the action backfired and killed Dorian. This can be seen as the “unveiling” of his secret as his soul and intentions are finally revealed after hiding behind the painting for so long. His death exposes everything that was previously concealed (Gradesfixer).Throughout the Picture of Dorian Gray, Dorian is always trying to hide or secrete something. Whether it’s the picture, conservation that led to death of Sibyl Vane, murder of Basil, blackmailing Alan Campbell, or whatever the case may be, Dorian was always trying to conceal something from the rest of the world. After his death, it is still a mystery. No one will know the true reasons why or what the reason it was that Dorian killed himself, they just know he is dead. This secrecy is kept from the rest of the characters in the novel, which is different as in the Island of Dr.Moreau Prendick knows just as much as the audience reading. Secrecy motivates both novels and is a common theme in Victorian Society. Secrecy is crucial in novels of the Victorian Era as it can drive a plot through the readers desire to reveal the secrets it holds, and through narrative or characters strategies to reserve those secrets and maintain suspense.

Throughout the novel, the use of misshapen and monstrous objects draws a comparison between the two novels and leads to a more suspenseful theme. In the Picture of Dorian Gray the picture seems to be monstrous and with corruption. “Beneath its purple pall, the face painted on the canvas could go bestial, sodden, and unclean” (Wilde 124). Dorian is depicted as a monstrous person, who at times could go bestial and crazy. The painting contains the truth of Dorian and is binded to his soul. Dorian starts off as an uncorrupted, innoncent, and beautiful person, but as the novel goes on he is turned into a monster. As his sins and crimes reflect the painting and eventually leads to his downfall. Hour by hour, and week by week, the thing upon the canvas was growing old. It might escape the hideousness of sin, but the hideousness of age was in store for it. The cheeks would become hollow or flaccid. Yellow crow’s feet would creep round the fading eyes and make them horrible. The hair would lose its brightness, the mouth would gape or droop, would be foolish or gross, as the mouths of old men are. There would be the wrinkled throat, the cold, blue-veined hands, the twisted body, that he remembered in the grandfather who had been so stern to him in his boyhood(Shmoop Quote). The picture had to be concealed. There was no help for it. On the outside, his secrets and stuff are not revealed and he does not seem like a monster to society. Everything is hidden inside the painting and not revealed. Because of his social status and amazing looks, he is able to preserve the true meaning behind the picture. The tipping point that made Dorian the monster he truly is, is when he killed Basil. When Basil confronts Dorian about the rumors and speculations that have to deal with his reputation, Dorian shows the painting to Basil. Basil is thunderstruck and taken away by the horrid portrait. Dorian becomes so angry and turns into the evil monster he is and stabs Basil. Wilde uses a different approach to convey his suspenseful and horror scenes. He uses the picture to show the evilness and corruption. Then he tops it off with horrific scenes such as the killing of Basil, suicide of Dorian, and decomposition of Basils body by Alan Campbell. The use of monstrous creatures and people is also evident by Wells. Wells, instead of using a portrait, literally uses monstrous animals and people in his novel. One account of these animals states “all of which were prognathous, malformed about the ears, with large and protuberant noses, very furry or bristly hair, and often strangely placed eyes” (Wells 62). These animals described are the Beast-Folk. They are half-human, half-animal prototypes that Dr. Moreau has created. The vivisections that Dr.Moreau performs on these humans and monsters are grotesque and evil, and challenge scientific methods of the Victorian Age such as Darwinism. Parallels can be drawn between the work of Wells and Wilde. The challenging of Victorian society morals, values, and use of monsters reflect ideas prevalent in society at the time. I believe that by the authors are trying to iterate the fact that evilness and monsters were a common theme that people were interested in at the same. Jekyll and Hide was the first to set the stage, and other novels followed. I believe that the two accounts and depictions of monsters differ for their own reasons. Wilde depicts Dorian as a monster as he is corrupt, evil, but is keeping the secret behind the painting. At the time it was written I believe it represents the changing of social classes, moral ethics, and different stereotypes at the same. However, in the Island of the Doctor Moreau, the combination of animal and humans and scientific basis represents Gothic fiction novels, and science at the point in time. The scientific experiments and combination of animals and humans was not new, but not common. Jekyll and Hyde was the first novel to use it, but it was a familiar new concept to write about. Scientific exploration was a huge basis for Wells writing. He wrote this in partly to challenge Darwinism and new advances of the time. By writing about monstrous creatures and half human-half human, it would serve to challenge the evolutionary theories Darwin instituted.

This leads into the next prevalent theme of gothic fiction that is in the novel: Secularization. By definition, secularization was a period when the disciplines and institutions of modern science were founded and cultural authority shifted from traditional authority of religion to explanation through the scientific exposition of natural laws. This theory was further developed by Charles Darwin, arguably the most influential person of the Victorian Era. Also, in secularization, there was a deep religious revival time. I believe that in the Picture of Dorian Gray, it contradicts the secularization of the time period. Lord Henry states “All influence is immoral, immoral from the scientific point of view. To influence a person is to give one’s soul”. Everything in Dorian Gray seems to point to contradict religious views and moral virtues of the time. In Island of Dr.Moreau, it also challenges scientific advances of the period. By moreau doing vivisections,he challenges Darwin, and also religious views on modifying persons and their physical states.

Horror is the greatest theme in both novels. Both have bloody scenes, suspenseful scenes, weird creatures/monsters. In the Picture of Dorian Gray, it is riddled with horror. “The surface seemed to be quite undisturbed… horror had come. (Wilde pg 115), is describing the death of Basil. To bring even more horror to the story, Dorian hides the crime with the help of Alan Campbell by decomposing the body. In the Island of Dr.Moreau, Wells wishes to delve into the horrors of the scientific age. Doctor Moreau has set himself up as a literal God above the bestial creatures he experiments upon. He has even handed down a series of Laws in a parody of God speaking down to Moses. The horror involved is to show the gruesome events that take place on the island. “A horrible fancy came into my head that Moreau after animalizing these men had infected their dwarfed brains with a kind of deification of himself.” (Wells 129) The island is full of horror.

After the horror, there seems to be a resolution where the main characters are sent into a state of social isolation. Dorian leaves reality, and doesn’t appear again until he is 38 years old. He ruined a bunch of peoples lives in society, and is so caught up with the guilt if the painting he plunges into isolation. He is also hiding to escape the rumors and tendencies of the upper class people in society who have rumors and speculations about the things Dorian has done. Prendick is similar to Dorian, and has isolated himself from society. He returns to London, and is still plagued by the screams and cries of the beasts on the island. He is scared to death of the stuff he had seen on the island, and has come to the conclusion that in some way or another, all men are like the Beast-Folk.

Lastly, there is an emphasis on the fear of dying. I believe that Prendick was scared of dying. He couldve easily died by the Beast-Folk or committed suicide. Instead, he waited it out and escaped the island. Dorian is truly scared of dying. He is frightened of James Vane. He does not want to have the same ending that Sibyl had and to commit suicide. However, trying to stab the painting to become a normal person and escape the sins and corruptions, he kills himself not knowing it is actually his soul in the painting.

Gothic fiction is certainly tied to the Picture of Dorian and Gray and Island of Dr. Moreau. Both use gothic horror to showcase Victorian society. At a time of new science, innovation, and religious enlightening, these novels serve to challenge these ideas, and also reflect them in a positive way. Although the two novels are written by different authors and about different subjects, they are connected through gothic fiction, specifically gothic horror.

Works Cited

  1. https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/an-introduction-to-the-island-of-doctor-moreau-science-sensation-and-degeneration
  2. https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/the-origins-of-the-gothic
  3. https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/the-victorian-supernatural
  4. http://nukemars.com/2012/09/gothic-monsters-the-litany-of-fear-in-h-g-wells-the-island-of-doctor-moreau/
  5. https://lit2120cole.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/moreau-as-a-product-of-gothic-horror/
  6. https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/perversion-and-degeneracy-in-the-picture-of-dorian-gray
  7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0950236X.2012.696490
  8. https://www.shmoop.com/picture-dorian-gray/chapter-16-quotes.html
  9. https://www.shmoop.com/dr-moreau/chapter-7-summary.html
  10. https://www.shmoop.com/picture-dorian-gray/ending.html
  11. https://www.shmoop.com/picture-dorian-gray/dorian-gray-character.html
  12. https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/the-life-of-secrecy/
  13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/preternature.2.2.0213?seq=1
  14. https://religiousfictions.wordpress.com/2017/05/10/religious-dystopia-in-the-picture-of-dorian-gray/
  15. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-island-of-dr-moreau/themes/scientific-knowledge-and-ethics
  16. https://wilkiecollinssociety.org/secrecy-and-disclosure-in-victorian-fiction/
  17. https://www.shmoop.com/dr-moreau/edward-prendick.html
  18. https://www.shmoop.com/picture-dorian-gray/chapter-16-quotes.html
  19. https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/elements-of-a-traditional-gothic-novel-in-the-picture-of-dorian-gray/
  20. https://study.com/academy/lesson/gothic-novels-characteristics-examples.html
  21. https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/perversion-and-degeneracy-in-the-picture-of-dorian-gray
  22. https://lit2120cole.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/moreau-as-a-product-of-gothic-horror/
  23. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/967902-you-used-to-stir-my-imagination-now-you-don-t-even

Reincarnation In Pets

The belief of reincarnation revolves around the idea that there is only a certain amount of energy in the world that is continuously recycled. The first law of thermodynamics includes that energy cannot be created or destroyed; it takes on other forms. The energy or “soul” that makes up a life does not burn out at death but rather altered to create new life. Cameron shows this in his novel A Dog’s Purpose in which a dog returns to his original owner after living through several lifetimes in different forms of a canine.

Philosophers have questioned why we are here for centuries, and with that came the creation of religion: a thing people could turn to when they could no longer find reason for life. One of the oldest religions follows the idea of reincarnation, the idea that the soul takes on other forms once one has passed. It follows the natural order of things and the laws of thermodynamics. Some beliefs pertaining religion have beings cycling though a number of lives only to go to an afterlife at the end of things. While others believe there is a certain amount of energy in the world that will continuously be recycled until the end. The idea arguably makes the most sense as it does not require the influence of a deity or greater being.

Experiments have been conducted showing that people have souls. The question being where does that soul go once a person dies. The idea of reincarnation originated in India approximately 1,000 to 600 BC. It is one of the oldest beliefs in history. This idea is backed by the law on conservation of energy by Albert Einstein who stated, “Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another.” Once a soul has left the body the energy has to be converted into new life, so it takes on another host.

There is very little research on reincarnation (especially in animals) as the only evidence of any religion is faith based. Jenny Smedley, however has written several books on the matter. Smedley believes that there is no scripture on animals because they are closer to God than people are. She thinks they do not need the same scripture and help that humans do in order to build a connection with God, and that they are here to guide us to live better lives. This is shown in W. Bruce Cameron’s book A Dog’s Purpose in which a boy grows up with a dog who passes, and years later in another one of the dog’s lives he returns to find his boy. The story follows the idea that when a creature passes it returns as the same species rather than another creature.

Many argue whether animals have a soul or not as most religious scripture provides little to no information on the matter. Religious books typically describe animals as a source of food or companionship for people. They are described as merely a tool for human enjoyment. Those who have shared a connection to a pet, however, often swear by the fact that they have souls, and many people find comfort in imagining their beloved pet is the reincarnate of someone they once knew. People want to hold onto the fact that their past loved ones are still with them, so they turn to the comfort of their pets.

Will Durant wrote, “The hope of another life gives us the courage to meet our own death, and to bear with the death of our loved ones; we are twice armed if we fight with faith.” People often hold onto religion as a coping mechanism to deal with death. Many argue that it is just that, and that the idea was made up to give people hope of something after. Death is one of the hardest things for people to deal with, whether it is the thought of their own or a loved one’s, and can even lead to a psychotic break if not dealt with correctly. The idea of an individual’s psyche no longer existing is too much for the human brain to fathom, so they began pondering where a person’s “soul” goes once they have passed.

People cannot process that there is a start and finish to every life as their lifetime is the only time they can remember. People know obviously that there was time before their consciousness, but they cannot possess a true understanding of the “before.” It does not feel like there was time before, and had no one been there to tell one another, an individual could feel as if they had always been. Religion was created as a way of understanding where a being is when they are not in the physical world.

Religion also allows people to feel as if their passed loved ones are still there. Reincarnation takes this a step further and allows the idea that the spirit of whomever is still in the physical world with them only in another form. There are several stories of after a friend or family member’s passing, people often build a connection with an animal and describe them as having similar characteristics as their loved one. Whether this is to make up for the loss in their life, or the person has really come back to them people may never know. Mankind have been trying to prove and disprove religion for centuries. They likely will never get the answers for which they are searching, but religion can be a comforting thing to consider in order to live a more fulfilling life.

Can Social Science Be As Definitive As Natural Science?

Before we prepare ourselves to answer this question, it is imperative to first familiarize ourselves with the terms used in the same. Science Science refers to the systematic and practical study of any aspect of the natural world, by means of observation and/or experiment. During the Renaissance movement, the scientific process evolved into a four-fold process that included observation, recording data, a theory explaining the observed phenomenon and the recorded data, and finally validation of the theory by further experiments.

Based on the subject matter it is concerned with, and also for the sake of this discussion, science can be broadly put into two categories, Natural Science and Social Science. Natural Science Wikipedia defines natural science as “Branch of science concerned with the description, prediction, and understanding of natural phenomena, based on empirical evidence from observation and experimentation.” For validation purpose, there are various methods employed by it. It includes peer review and repeatability of occurrences. It can be further divided into two branches, which are life sciences and physical sciences. But we would not be concerning ourselves with these, as they are out of the scope of this discussion. Social Sciences Social sciences are a field of study related to society and the relationships that individuals inside it share amongst each other. The term social science became popular in the late eighteenth century with knowledge of society being treated as a science as disciplined and systematic methods were applied to study individuals as well as society as a whole and various social institutions.

The methodology used by social scientists may vary. Positivist social scientists use methods that resemble those of natural sciences whereas interpretivist social scientists use social critique or symbolic representation instead of falsifiable theories. With the basic definitions at hand, let’s now look at some things which make the two aforementioned branches of science different. Quantitative vs Qualitative Natural sciences use formal scientific methods, like mathematics and logic, to make sense of the nature around us. It is done by quantifying the knowledge of our environment and the various phenomena through which it manifests itself. Social Sciences also make use of these methods, but they are oriented primarily towards the qualitative rather than the quantitative. This is the reason why the Social sciences are called soft science and the natural sciences, with their emphasis on quantifiable data, are called hard sciences.

Social Research Social research can be divided into two broad categories: quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative design sees social phenomena from statistical point of view and through quantifiable proof and then aims to make valid claims. Qualitative research understands social phenomena via direct observation , communication with subjects,analysis of text and may lay emphasis on subjectiveness instead of generality. It is sometimes referred to as method to get non-numerical data. Public Policy The policy-making process involves a sequence of steps to be followed before implementing the policy. It begins with identification of objectives and declaring the goal. Now, the next step is specification of alternatives, which requires use of both natural and social sciences. Both disciplines are taken into account before moving to evaluating policy alternatives and policy selection. What are facts? The Cambridge English Dictionary defines facts as: “Something that is known to have happened or to exist, especially something for which proof exists, or about which there is information” In simple words, a fact can be stated as something which is consistent with objective reality and evidently proved to be true.

They are the reality, situations, and relations that make some sentence to be true. For example, ‘Law of conservation of energy exists’ because there are facts that make it true. Likewise, statements as ‘5+7=12’ and ‘Visarg is happy’ are true only because there are facts to prove them true, and subsequently, they themselves can be called as facts. In philosophy, the concept of fact is considered in epistemology and ontology. Facts are backed by reality and truth and they provide the actuality to a statement or a sentence. Here, the facts and truth have close relations. In the natural sciences like physics and chemistry, when we refer to facts, we more often than not mean phenomena that are proven to happen repeatedly and predictably. That is, however many times you carry out a scientific experiment or observe some natural event, it is going to result in a known and predictable outcome, inside the bounds of some natural uncertainty. In other words, repeating a certain experiment or observation, while maintaining other factors unchanged gives a predictable, repeating outcome. This forms the basis of theories and concepts in natural sciences. Theories are induced from observing natural phenomena, and future events are subsequently deduced from the existing theories. This interplay of inductive and deductive reasoning forms the backbone of natural sciences.

With the social sciences, however, things get a bit more complicated. Social sciences deal with the study of human society and the existence of various forms of relationships and interactions within them. And human beings, in general, are not as simple as a molecule of benzene or a projectile hurled off a building. We are most frequently driven by our emotions and ideals, not unlike the following theory of notable psychologist Sigmund Freud: “All of a person’s actions are traceable to any of the following two sources: his will to assert dominance over another man, or his desire to command the romantic attention of the opposite sex.” A human may behave differently under the same observing conditions, depending on a multitude of other, uncontrollable factors. With such diverse and volatile subjects under consideration, obtaining results and ‘theories’ in social sciences tilts towards the probabilistic domain, as opposed to the deterministic outcomes in natural sciences. Facts in social science are probabilistic Having said this, we can directly establish a connection between facts and probability. Facts can be considered probabilistic. For natural sciences, where we can determine the exact variables that are the input to the functional model, a fact can correspond to a statement with a probability of one and thus one can exactly predict the outcome of a scientific experiment as it would be a “matter of fact”.

For social sciences, the determination of exact variables is not possible as it concerns itself with the human factor, which relies on emotion and feelings and thus these facts are believed to have a probability anywhere between zero and one, with variations for different kinds of observations obviously. The outcome of a social experiment cannot be exactly predicted, rather we can have a set of possible outcomes. Many experiments like ‘The Big Bell test’ (which was conducted in order to introduce human choices into the field of quantum mechanics) have been conducted to establish a relation between randomness and the volatile and ever-changing human factor. Can they be interrelated? Based on the above discussion, it appears as if experiments in the natural and social sciences are similar; it is only a matter of knowing what variables to input. For example, we earlier stated that a human may behave differently, unpredictably, under the same observing conditions, at different points of time. We can levy this uncertainty onto our lack of knowledge of the infinite variables that lead to this difference of decision. Variables like what kind of external stimuli the person received during that time frame, the action and concentration of different chemicals in his brain, what reaction these chemicals had to the aforementioned external stimuli, his intuition and ideals, etc. that would lead him to behave in the particular way as was observed. An analogy to the above discussion can be given in the natural science domain as well.

The well known French scholar Pierre-Simon Laplace envisioned a concept (known as Laplace’s demon) in which he stated that if we know the exact position and momentum of each and every particle present in the universe at any given point of time, we can predict the values of all the variables at any given time in the future. This sounds absurd at first glance, but on deeper thought, comes out as quite a logical approach. The obvious loophole here is the fact that there do not exist any physical means by which to gather all this information. But, hypothetically, if a means like this existed (which Laplace thought of a Demon), we could predict anything and everything going on about the universe. There wouldn’t exist any uncertainties, any probabilities. Everything would be deterministic; in other words, every study and observation would converge towards the domain of natural sciences. This argument forms the crux of this whole discussion. Is it really the lack of information about variables that keeps us from proclaiming social sciences as definitive and deterministic?

Natural vs Social science Both natural and social sciences aren’t exactly definitive, since nothing can measured accurately. Some branches in science like health sciences provide their conclusions by taking majority of the signal collected. So it is safe to say that in natural sciences, the physical sciences are more definitive than life sciences.The argument though, that social science is not as definitive as natural science holds true when looked through proper definition. Simply put, in true definitive sense social sciences has only “facts” and “hypothesis” but not “laws” and “theories”. This is due to the fact that “Laws” and “Theories” take all the events into calculation whereas “Facts” and “Hypothesis” only take singular event into consideration.

The way both the sciences are approached are also different. In natural sciences only scientific method is used but in social along with scientific method social critique and interpretive methods are used which makes it harder for it to be definitive. Moreover in natural sciences no emotional linkage is attached between the researcher and study.

But, as it turns out, even if Laplace’s proverbial demon did exist, he would have a hard time carrying out his thought experiment. The reason for that lies in the ever-increasing entropy of the universe. But to understand what entropy is, we need to wrap our heads around the true meaning of random, something entropy is most commonly associated with. What is Random? When the outcome of an event is uncertain and contains no predictable patterns, we call it random. Now the usage of the word ’random’ itself is quite debatable. We often consider unplanned and unrelated events as random events. For example, consider the event of ‘randomly’ bumping into a friend at a restaurant. This event is, in its true meaning, is not random. It can be easily predicted given sufficient initial information, such as what their taste of food is, their budget, distance of the restaurant from their house, their willingness to go to a restaurant in the first place, etc. But first, what does information fundamentally mean? If we consider every letter of every word of this essay, it’s easy to assume that each of them carries some information. But is the amount of information carried by them the same? If it were to say so then the following image would make no sense whatsoever : (Image credits: SSed from the Veritasium video “What is not random?”) We can read this because we are used to certain patterns in the English language, like a ‘u’ after a ‘q’, an ‘e’ or ‘a’ after ‘th’, an ‘i’ before or after ‘e’, etc. Any random permutation of letters does not make a word.

A completely compressed and distilled piece of information (somewhat like the above picture), which makes no sense by itself, is true randomness. A non-repeating sequence of binary digits in no defined order is random; it is the CPU’s job to interpret it and make sense of the randomness, and thus decode the information it contains. Therefore, if we want to know how much information a system contains, we must calculate how random that system is, and vice versa. This is a theorem stated in the Information Theory given by Claude E. Shannon, that “ Information is directly proportional to randomness.” And, as we’re all well aware, randomness is scientifically referred to as entropy. Coming back to the point, The Second Law of Thermodynamics proclaims the entropy of the universe to be on a constantly increasing curve, as the universe is constantly expanding. This, from our previous discussion, implies that the information in the universe is constantly increasing as we would need more data and statistics to define the new state of universe. But where does this new entropy comes from? Now as per the above definition true randomness should mean nothing. So what is a system which is defined by nothing.

The best answer we have as a scientific community lies in quantum mechanics. The basic particles are defined as probabilities in the quantum theory. This means that one cannot predict the exact position of the electron rather we can only calculate the probability where it is likely to be. This is what we call ‘Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle’. So everytime a quantum measurement is made we have gained information. These quantum events cannot be discarded if we consider the butterfly effect which states “the sensitive dependence on initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state”. Now it is very tempting to consider second law as a bane but it is because of this law truly unexpected can occur. So this arguments justify the Human Free Will. (End of my part. Ab Kuch philosophy pel do yaha so it seems that we have approached the problem from both ends of the spectrum )

Greek Exploring Mathematics and the Natural Sciences: Pythagoras Theorem

A fundamental purpose of human social structures is to capture knowledge and convey it to succeeding generations. Individuals must acquire that knowledge through observations made within these structures, such as culture and education. Knowledge is defined as facts/skills acquired through the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. It is clear that much of our current knowledge is a culmination of centuries of knowledge evolving into what it is today. To me, the title implies that what we already know is the sole determinant of what we are going to know, thus insinuating that knowledge production cannot take place if no past experiences are available. Present knowledge can (and in almost all cases does) build upon past knowledge, but exactly how much is dependent is questionable. I agree with this title to a large extent as no knowledge arises from nothing, nor does anything material or virtual come from nothing in this reality. However, in order to affirm this claim, I will need to ensure that there are no Areas of Knowledge in which current knowledge is not wholly dependent on past knowledge. Through exploring Mathematics and the Natural Sciences, I will endeavour to ascertain whether the title is unerring.

Inherently connected to reason, all current knowledge in mathematics is supported by the most basic concepts developed in the past. Mathematics is an Area of Knowledge which is the study of numbers, quantities, shapes and the relations between them. Mathematical proo fs in all fields (e.g geometry and arithmetic) have similar logical structures to follow, and everything I have learnt in my IB SL Maths class up to now depends on basic arithmetic calculations and axioms. The continuous historical development of modern arithmetic can be traced back to the age of Thales of Miletus (624-548 BC) in ancient Greece, where the two earliest mathematical theorems, Thales’ theorem and Intercept theorem are attributed to. Although it is unknown whether he was the one who introduced into mathematics the logical structure that is so ubiquitous today, it is known that within two hundred years of Thales the Greeks had introduced the idea of proof into mathematics. Another important figure is Pythagoras of Samos (580-500 BC). He developed the Pythagoras theorem, which states that the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of its other two sides, or a^2 + b^2 = c^2. This theorem is not only the basis of trigonometry but can also be expanded and used in fields ranging from astronomy to social networking. There is little doubt that Pythagoras and his groundbreaking ideas helped shape the way we currently view the impact of numbers in our daily lives. Lastly, Gerolamo Cardano, an Italian polymath, was one of the most influential mathematicians of the Renaissance and one of the key figures in the foundation of probability and the binomial theorem. Today, he is well known for his achievements in algebra, making the first systematic use of negative numbers in Europe, acknowledged the existence of imaginary numbers and published the solutions of cubic and quartic equations. Moreover, the methodology on the number theory, mathematical analysis, integral calculus and applied mathematics are based on discoveries of past mathematicians.

However, although long held mathematical reasoning is useful, new insights often require thinking outside of the box. All past knowledge is only in the past- the present is innovation of knowledge that must be dealt with. Recently developed maths theories have revealed the nature of numbers. Ken Ono, an Emory mathematician, proved that partition numbers behave like fractals, discovered the divisibility properties of partitions, and developed a mathematical theory for seeing their infinitely repeating structure (that wasn’t anticipated a few years ago). Additionally, he devised the first finite formula to calculate the partitions of any number, which has changed how mathematicians study partitions.

To measure linear dependence, scientists use the correlation coefficient, which was first introduced by Sir Francis Galton and justified by Karl Pearson. However, if the dependence between the variables is non-linear, the correlation-coefficient is no longer a suitable measure for their dependence. A solution to this problem was developed by Dr Björn Böttcher in 2019- a dependence measure called ‘distance multivariance’, where not only the values of the observed variables but their mutual distances are recorded and the distance multivariance is calculated. This allows for the detection of complex dependencies and can be applied when big data sets need to be analysed.

On the other hand, in the Area of Knowledge of Natural Sciences, the production of current knowledge cannot be accurate without considerations of past observations and experiences. In my IB Biology class, I learnt that biodiversity conservation requires decades of data from observations and experiments. Conservationists monitor the fluctuations of natural populations in order to perceive correlations and hence reason what factors might be causing dangers to various species and prevent extinction- a fundamental ecological process and the ultimate fate of all populations. A thorough and reliable understanding of processes that influence extinction risk inform multiple applied ecological problems, including habit restoration, biological control and conservation of endangered species. Plausible explanations were developed due to the knowledge of past extinctions such as the End Permian occurring 251 million years ago and the K-T mass extinction 65 million years ago. Scientists can presently understand that species go extinct primarily as a result of a combination of changes to their environment, reduced food supply and competition with others.

In an ever changing world of newer technology, the past seems irrelevant. However, the events that took place in the past wholly tackle the present and help understand the physics of our ever changing natural world. One of the largest areas of concern is the South Atlantic Anomaly, a dip in the magnetic field over the southern parts of the Atlantic Ocean which is exposed to more harmful cosmic radiation. To better understand how Earth’s magnetic field truly works, the study of history comes into play. During the Iron Age in 1000 AD, tribes in Southern Africa would occasionally burn down their houses for cleansing. The process would heat up mineral rich floors to 982 degrees celsius and the moment they cooled they would capture the Earth’s polarity. This has allowed modern scientists to consider the Earth’s polarity dating back thousands of years in the exact area where the South Atlantic Anomaly is studied. “All signs point to the magnetic field being comparable to today’s anomaly holding situation, a piece of information that finally exists with proof behind the find”. Understanding the history of the planet is essential in the mystery of the South Atlantic Anomaly.

Evolution is another process that come under clear focus once studied through the lens of both history and science. Relying on natural selection, it is the change in the characteristics of a species over several generations. Biology can only be truly understood by first understanding evolution. There is information hidden in evolutionary history of life on Earth that can illuminate what happens in mammals today and to stay ahead of pathogenic diseases, researchers must study the evolutionary histories of the disease-causing genes, allowing us to gain insight into other gene regulatory pathways and improve human health.

However, when there is not much past knowledge available on a specific field, knowledge production requires more new explorations than old experiences. Two teams of physicists have obtained the first glimpse of the surface of a pulsar. Newly created maps of the that surface reveal bright blemishes in the star’s southern hemispheres, hinting at the presence of complex magnetic fields. This new data could help researchers understand how matter behaves under extreme pressure. Additionally, recently discovered neutron stars themselves can give us hints and contribute to fundamental physics. ‘The data points to magnetic complexity. Though this is not a breakthrough yet, more understanding will come out of this, says astrophysicist Feryal Özel. Humans have the intangible desire to explore and challenge the boundaries of what we know- depending wholly on past knowledge cannot truly allow for in-depth explorations of present and future knowledge.

Overall, to a large extent present knowledge is wholly dependent on past knowledge. In the AOK of Mathematics, current knowledge depends considerably on the most basic axioms and since it is largely invented by people, almost all mathematical theories depend on the common mathematical reasoning, as illustrated by the examples of Thales, Pythagoras and Cardano. However, new insights often require separation from basic conjectures and recent mathematical theories have allowed for detection of complex dependencies and revealed the true nature of numbers. Knowledge production in the Natural Sciences is influenced much more by current needs than mathematics is. Much of our biological knowledge is derived from observable truths, such as monitoring physical patterns of various species. These truths are not falsifiable and can act as evidence for knowledge production. However, knowledge production in physics requires new explorations rather than old experiences. Recently obtained data may shed light onto magnetic complexity and how matter behaves under pressure, which can contribute tremendously to fundamental physics and allow for direct support of current knowledge production that is not wholly dependent on past knowledge.