Category: Congress

As a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for District 10, Michael McCaul is the Congressman that is busy helping keep U.S. borders secure, the economy sound, our healthcare affordable, our energy resources safe, veterans cared for, plus other concerns that affect the individual freedoms of the average American. He is currently the Lead Republican on the Foreign Affairs committee where he and many others use their skills to combat threats from across the world. He also is the Former Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, which mainly protects Americans from foreign attack. Several of his legislator achievements include the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Act (2018), Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (2018), the Securing America’s Future Act (2018) and, of course, several others. His district covers many adjoining counties including Harris County, which is where I live.

Congressman McCaul has very definite views on the Economy and his role in assisting the American people in keeping more of their hard-earned wages. He states “I support pro-growth economic policies that foster innovation and job creation.” (mccaul.house.gov/issues/economy). McCaul is concerned that America is headed for hyperinflation and he supports legislation that will help businesses prosper, keep taxes low to help families keep more of their paychecks, and he would like to lower the Capital Gains tax to promote private investing. He feels strongly about keeping jobs going in the U.S. economy. Mr. McCaul thinks that keeping jobs available for Americans is important because it puts money in the average American’s pocket. He does not want to increase taxes. When Americans have extra cash, it moves the economy up and moves money around.

Congressman McCaul has fought and voted for many energy policies that would lower the United States’ reliance on other countries’ oil and gas, allowing the United States to become more independent and focus more on finding our natural resources here in the States. McCaul believes that this would strengthen our economy as well as bolster our national security(mccaul.house.gov/issues/energy). McCaul believes in reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil and expanding American sources of energy production here in the USA. He says “America is blessed with an abundance of natural resources that should be developed responsibly. This is both good for our economy and our national security.”( https://mccaul.house.gov/issues/energy) McCaul has voted for many policies that would expand the American oil and energy trade including the promotion of new refineries, the expansion of nuclear power plants, advancing offshore energy production which allows for new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and also “requires the Secretary of the Interior to issue drilling leases in the outer continental shelf.”(mccaul.house.gov/issues/energy).

Since Congressman McCaul is from Texas, and we have thousands of miles of border with Mexico, border security is a concern for the people in the United States. One of the ways that America can control the risk to our security is the use of Biometrics. Wikipedia says that this is a system that identifies people specifically by distinctive characteristics like their fingerprints, palm veins, face recognition, DNA, palm print, iris recognition, and even gait, voice, and odor. (en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Biometrics) This is used by Homeland Security and other law enforcement agencies to identify terrorists, actors, and human traffickers when they attempt to cross the American Border or are arrested in our country. Many In people call the situation on our common border with Mexico, a crisis. In June. 2019, alone the number of unaccompanied minors reached almost 3000 a day. This taxes the manpower of the Border Patrol to make sure these minors get to the correct facilities or even to the hospital if that is needed. In one day, alone, seventy trips to the hospital were made by Border Patrol Security. (foxnews.com/opinion/rep-michael-mccaul-border-crisis-immigration-democrats-house-politics). Along with Congressman Bill Goodlatte, the Securing America’s Future Act is a bill introduced to help with adding barriers along the border which included walls, cameras, and more manpower patrolling the border. This bill is intended to close immigration loopholes get rid of diversity visa programs, and get rid of chain migration. These things are meant to achieve operational control at the border. (https://mccaul.house.gov/issues/border-security)

Being the son of a WWII B-17 bombardier shows how proud Michael McCaul is of his father, and his real concern for the well-being of our nation’s veterans, and the issues that affect their lives. He feels that because veterans join our military voluntarily to sacrifice their lives, if necessary, we as Americans have a responsibility to give our veterans better services. We should help our veterans in the areas of healthcare, financial assistance, and education. In his pursuit to make veterans’ lives better, he helped pass a law that would pay bonuses for service members and allowed for a raise in pay for the military. McCaul has also devoted time to sponsoring legislators to allow veterans to pursue higher education, and giving housing stipends to those who were affected by natural disasters, McCaul says “I remain committed to working tirelessly on behalf of our veterans who commit their lives to keep us safe.”( https://mccaul.house.gov/issues/veterans)

In conclusion, Michael McCaul is the Congressman who is busy helping keep U.S. borders secure, the economy sound, our healthcare affordable, our energy resources safe, veterans cared for, plus other concerns that affect the individual freedoms of the average American. He supports a strong economy and wants to keep jobs going in the U.S. thinking this will put more money in the average American’s pocket. McCaul also believes in making America more self-reliant and independent with its resources such as oil and gas. He has helped put in multiple policies that would expand our energy industry with laws, such as, promoting the building of new refineries. Also, McCaul works tirelessly to keep our borders safe from terrorism, enacting laws that will benefit and humanely treat the immigrants coming across the borders into our country. His concerns for the youngest, most vulnerable immigrants coming into America challenge him to always seek good results for resources used to help them. Lastly, while very proud of the veterans of the U.S., Congressman McCaul actively seeks through legislation, to promote ideas and laws that will pay back these fine men for the service they have given to our country.

Some differences and similarities came with the Wartime, Presidential, and Congressional Reconstruction. The wartime reconstruction took place from 1863-1865. The presidential reconstruction took place from 1865-1867. The congressional reconstruction took place in 1867.

The wartime reconstruction started in 1863 during the war (Shi 534). The person who was responsible for the wartime reconstruction was President Lincon, he believed that reconstruction during the war was a good decision, but Congress had different views on that. Lincoln’s main concern was unity within the nation. In December of 1863, Lincoln gave his proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction. Lincoln’s purpose with this was to abolish slavery and bring peace (Shi 534). Congress responded to this by not agreeing with Lincoln, so Congress came up with their plan called the Wade Davis Bill in July of 1864 (Shi 535). What this did was raise the oath requirement to fifty percent, rather than ten percent which was what Lincoln came up with and it also guaranteed equality of freedmen (Shi 535). Just before Lincoln died he gave a speech where he stated that he was for black suffrage, around 1865 (Shi 535). Andrew Johnson took over when Lincoln died and he was the one who led the next reconstruction called the Presidential Reconstruction which took place in 1865 (Shi 536).

During the presidential reconstruction, Andrew Johnson had around the same views as Lincoln, but he was a little more lenient with the South. What Johnson had allowed for the South to do was reconstruct themselves. Due to no guidance or no one stopping the South on what to do, this caused a rise in inequality for the blacks, this was called the black codes. What the black codes did was they kept the blacks from voting, kept them from job opportunities, and limited some of their rights (Shi 583). These laws of inequality were noticed by the North and they thought they needed to come in and fix the South, which led to our next reconstruction called the Congressional Reconstruction that happened in 1867. The major difference between the presidential and congressional reconstruction is that the congressional reconstruction takes a more strict approach to change the South. When Congress came to help change the South they told them they needed to change their ways and laws before they were going to be let back into the union (Shi 540). With this congressional reconstruction, this is where the Fifteenth Amendment happened, which allowed all men to vote, this passed in the year 1870.

These are the differences and similarities between all three reconstructions. Overall the two that are most similar were the wartime and presidential reconstruction. That was because both of the people in charge of these reconstructions were very lenient on what they let the South do, but with that came issues. That led to the reconstruction that was mostly different from the other two, which was the congressional reconstruction. The major difference here was how strict this reconstruction was on the south, the south had no choice but to change their ways on how they were treated the black people.

As per Article 1 Section 1 of the US Constitution, Congress is the legislative body of the government; they are the only ones to make laws in the US. Further Congress has been divided into two sections Senators from each state and house of representatives which has delegates from each state depends on the state population. It will be a violation of the constitution if any other government institution or entity make law in the US.

Raising the minimum wage is a big topic for the government, business community, and economic pundits, there is positive and negative effects of everything we do. In my opinion, Congress should raise the mandatory minimum wage because of: first, it is long overdue and second, there are more there are more advantages than disadvantages. Current federal minimum wage is $7.25 which is lower in real value than in 1956. Moreover, as the majority of minimum wage workers are adult with a family, at this wage, it is impossible to feed their families. With just $7.25 an hour, a worker makes $15,080 per year which much below the federal poverty line for a small family of three. There are few other advantages like a raise in economic stimulus, reduced government expense for social programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that raising the national minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour would uplift almost a million people out of poverty line. On the other hand, people have argued a few cons like layoffs, as employers have a limited budget and an increase in minimum wage will impact organizations capability to hire more people or fewer hiring. Higher wages might affect the market price of a product as the employer would like to generate a higher income to support higher salaries.

Individual states can implement their laws and pass their minimum wage law. State minimum can be lower, same or higher than the federal minimum wage. The state can also decide not to have any minimum wage at all. If a state has no minimum wage law or its minimum wage is lower than the federal law, workers are entitled to the federal wage. If a state’s minimum wage is higher than the federal one, workers are entitled to the state-specific wage. Higher minimum wages are more common in states with higher costs of living. Currently, 29 states and the District of Columbia have minimum hourly wages above the federal level of $7.25.

The argument about the minimum wage touches many critical aspects like a person on minimum wage can survive, any contribution towards the economy, dependency on government public policies? According to many religions, for instance, Aristotle and the Catholic church have talked about fair earning in their social teaching. A minimum wage is ethical, if it maintains human rights and dignity, supports the common good, creates right relationships, financial security for all and contributes to the common good which fits in Utilitarianism framework. Catholic society also believes that organizations have the ethical duty towards their employees to build up the right associations with their workers by paying living wages. The Utilitarianism framework resonates with me considering the overall economic advantage of paying living wages, which in return increased productivity, quality, and innovation all of which add to enormous profits for both employer and employee – thereby contributing to the common good.

The minimum wage in America has been an ongoing issue for many underpaid workers across the country for years. The debate of the minimum wage raise has been around since the raise in 2007 when it was raised from $5.85 to $7.25, which is where it currently stands. Recently, there have been suggestions in Congress to raise the minimum to $15 per hour, this would be a significant change compared to the current $7.25. There has been no documentation or assembly to debate the matter but this raises the question, is $7.25 a liveable wage in modern-day America?

The minimum wage was established in 1938 from the Fair Standard Labor Act, also known as the FSLA. The FSLA established minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards affecting employees. They also govern child labor and overtime hours laws. They are a branch in the government to help dispute and bring changes to laws and regulations to everyone in America.

The minimum wage first started off at 40 cents per hour, then was raised to $1.00 in 1958. After this, it was raised multiple times. In 1961, it increased to $1.51, then $2.10 in 1975, $3.31 in 1980, $4.25 in 1995, $6.55 in 2007, and $7.25 which has been the wage since 2008. Since minimum wage began in 1938, there have been patterns of the minimum not being raised over a significant amount of time. Though prior reasons to increase the wage were economic growth, workers unions, or to stabilize economic downturns, it hasn’t been raised over the last decade though these factors continue to impact our market. As our economy is continuously changing due to the 2020 Covid-19 outbreak, it would be fair to say if there was a time to consider raising or changing the minimum wage it would be crucial to do it now, rather than in the future when the economy has a potential downward spiral.

There has been a bill brought to Congress about possibly raising the minimum wage for individuals with disabilities, but this is the only document that suggested the federal raise for anyone. Our current president, Joe Biden, is pushing for the minimum to be raised to $15 per hour. He currently has raised the minimum for federal workers and agencies to $15 per hour. If in fact the wage is raised to his suggested wage, it would be double the current minimum wage per hour. Since Joe Biden still has a great deal of time in office, a nation-wide wage raise is completely possible.

Congress is in charge of raising the minimum wage and without their authority, no laws or amendments are passed, so getting Congress to support the law would be highly difficult unless there would be premeditated safeguards that would come with it to prevent depression and inflation. Although it would take much effort to convince members of Congress to come to an agreement, it is only right to debate the matter for the American people.

Having as many people as possible on minimum wage would lower the need for public assistance, which will reduce the tax burden on communities and the state. This would need Congress’s approval to reduce any sudden changes or stressors on the economy. Although there would need to be compromises in certain areas like taxes, government budget cuts, school funding and other government priorities to effectively raise the minimum wage, there are alternative solutions to allow the raise of minimum wage.

Imposing the minimum wage on certain markets could potentially have good effects on the working class as it would improve the quality of jobs and workers. Markets like fast food and entry-level jobs would be the ideal area to raise the minimum wage because it provides equal opportunity for individuals without experience or a degree to obtain a livable income. Jobs that require higher education already have a smaller market due to the requirements and this alteration would provide the working class with more comparable wages.

In last year alone, 39 million people made less than $11 per hour—this is substantially low, especially by the direction our economy is heading right now. A staggering 21% of minimum wage workers are currently relying upon government assistance to survive in our current economy. Without government assistance, these people have to rely on $11 per hour to feed families, raise children, and pay for necessities while juggling bills, mortgages, and anything life throws their way. It is in the best interest of our nation for the government to help people in these situations, and raising wages could resolve this issue without people heavily relying on government assistance.

Raising the minimum wage could possibly help 38 million Americans that suffer from poverty. Since 2019, 3.3 million Americans have become impoverished. This raise could help struggling families and poverty-stricken areas around the United States not only survive in their current situation but thrive. The goal isn’t to give a quick-fix solution for those suffering from poverty, but rather to ensure a brighter future for those who are unfortunate enough to get into that situation.

Inequality has been a major problem in American History, specifically the pay gap between men, women, and minors. On average, women have made 93 cents for every dollar a man of the same age earned from recent studies in 2019. Inequality is most apparent in higher-paying jobs and markets, and these raises could close the gap to provide more fair wages for everyone. Minors are also, at times, looked at as unequal. In low-level, minimum wage jobs minors are often taken advantage of in poor working conditions because most adults are unable to pay their bills on a minimum wage income, leaving minors to take these positions. More often than not, employers do not give minors the benefits that they would give adult employees. Since minors don’t receive insurance benefits, the minimum wage for the types of positions they hold should be raised. It is only reasonable since employers don’t have to provide the benefits which are significantly cost-effective for them.

Raising the minimum wage would reduce the tax burden on the state and federal government, as some people who make the minimum are forced to use food stamps, welfare, and rent assistance. It would decrease the number of people who are forced to use these services because of the low wage. Tax cuts could potentially put the economy on an incline because there would be more money circulating.

With the rise of minimum wage comes the possibility of inflation, which means our economy would be in a decline and the prices of things would fluctuate because people are making more money to buy the product and there isn’t enough to supply so they raise the price. In the U.S., inflation is already creating a problem. Gas prices have skyrocketed because the oil industry took a big hit during the beginning of Covid-19. This is an example of how inflation could affect lower-class families and workers.

Another effect of raising the minimum wage is layoffs, in certain job markets. It may be necessary to make layoffs, which could potentially increase the poverty rate, unemployment rate, and increase the number of people who are aided by government assistance. The whole point of having a higher minimum wage is to create better opportunities for lower-class workers, but if the raising of the minimum wage would cause layoffs, it would be entirely counterproductive, and would overall leave the lower-class workers at a complete disadvantage with an even harder job market to get into while having to rely on government assistance.

If employers decided to not make layoffs, there is a possibility that they would just put roadblocks in the way of obtaining employer-provided insurance and benefits. Since they are paying their employees more, it would be unethical to do as people that need the insurance and benefits and would be left to deal with it themselves. Benefits like vacation time, personal leave, and bonuses may not be paid or provided, and employers wouldn’t feel the need to incentivize these things if the employees are already making higher wages. Ultimately, this would leave workers frustrated even though they got the raise, which leaves it at an unfair compromise, as employees would feel that employers are treating them unfairly, but in reality, it would be one of the trade-offs that they would be forced to make as a business.

People who would come in for jobs without experience or degrees would be at a disadvantage because employers are going to be more prompted to hire higher educated and certified workers. This would make the job market extremely competitive and overall leave more people unemployed due to degrees and experience which would raise the unemployment rate. This would make more people forced to collect unemployment and other government benefits which would overall raise taxes. Also, it would force people to pursue said education and certifications, which would create more debt with an extremely competitive job market, overall leaving these degrees less valuable.

Small businesses would suffer because some businesses won’t have enough money to meet the new demands by the government and be forced to lay off employees, in turn, this would leave the small businesses with two choices, lay off employees and have to work the business by themselves, which would be a very challenging task, or try to pay the minimum wage and risk going broke and having their business go under or in debt due to the wage. Small businesses would be the biggest hit in the economy if the wages were raised substantially higher, they would be heavily taxed because when an employee’s salary is raised, the employer’s taxes raise as well, this would overall leave the businesses on the short end of the stick with few options left for themselves.

With a possible rise of the minimum wage, there is the potential for decreased government spending due to an influx of tax dollars paid into the government as well as a decreased need for public services. The public services that many citizens currently need that are provided by the government are funded by taxpayer dollars. If fewer citizens don’t need services or assistance, it may be possible to completely scrap some of these public services or fund them less because it isn’t in as high of a demand. One disadvantage to decreasing public services, however, is that people who rely on these services due to being unemployed or disabled may have to deal with program cutbacks as well. Fewer benefits could affect poverty-stricken communities and areas that have a higher unemployment rate. If the government could find a balanced solution, this could have a good outcome for people who do and don’t use public services and assistance.

There have been few alternative solutions that supporters of raising the minimum wage or Congress have proposed that do not have a potential negative impact on American business owners, but it should be considered that raising the minimum wage could leave small businesses out to dry. When a worker’s salary is increased, so are the employer’s taxes and the cost of running their business. A viable solution to counter this negative impact on small businesses would be to give tax cuts that would be beneficial to both the employer and employee. Another potential downside to raising the minimum wage would be that employers may resort to automation, which could potentially put 1.4 million Americans out of work. This trickle-down effect wouldn’t be ideal for the working class. Tax cuts may be a solution in this case as well.

To prevent these negative impacts, the minimum wage could be adjusted to the cost of living in different states and areas. For example, “The cost of living in New York is 129% higher than the national average” (Kaushal). With the average minimum in New York areas being around 10 dollars an hour, it makes it extremely hard for people working in those areas, having that high of a cost of living to reside there. Adjusting the minimum to the cost of living would be more ideal so that the economy wouldn’t inflate as much, but at the same time, there would be better wages that correspond with the area that you live in. Overall, Americans would benefit from increased wages, and we, as the people, should be able to live a better life with much fair, liveable income.

As per Article 1 Section 1 of the US Constitution, Congress is the legislative body of the government; they are the only ones to make laws in the US. Further Congress has been divided into two sections Senators from each state and house of representatives which has delegates from each state depends on the state population. It will be a violation of the constitution if any other government institution or entity make law in the US.

Raising the minimum wage is a big topic for the government, business community, and economic pundits, there is positive and negative effects of everything we do. In my opinion, Congress should raise the mandatory minimum wage because of: first, it is long overdue and second, there are more there are more advantages than disadvantages. Current federal minimum wage is $7.25 which is lower in real value than in 1956. Moreover, as the majority of minimum wage workers are adult with a family, at this wage, it is impossible to feed their families. With just $7.25 an hour, a worker makes $15,080 per year which much below the federal poverty line for a small family of three. There are few other advantages like a raise in economic stimulus, reduced government expense for social programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that raising the national minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour would uplift almost a million people out of poverty line. On the other hand, people have argued a few cons like layoffs, as employers have a limited budget and an increase in minimum wage will impact organizations capability to hire more people or fewer hiring. Higher wages might affect the market price of a product as the employer would like to generate a higher income to support higher salaries.

Individual states can implement their laws and pass their minimum wage law. State minimum can be lower, same or higher than the federal minimum wage. The state can also decide not to have any minimum wage at all. If a state has no minimum wage law or its minimum wage is lower than the federal law, workers are entitled to the federal wage. If a state’s minimum wage is higher than the federal one, workers are entitled to the state-specific wage. Higher minimum wages are more common in states with higher costs of living. Currently, 29 states and the District of Columbia have minimum hourly wages above the federal level of $7.25.

The argument about the minimum wage touches many critical aspects like a person on minimum wage can survive, any contribution towards the economy, dependency on government public policies? According to many religions, for instance, Aristotle and the Catholic church have talked about fair earning in their social teaching. A minimum wage is ethical, if it maintains human rights and dignity, supports the common good, creates right relationships, financial security for all and contributes to the common good which fits in Utilitarianism framework. Catholic society also believes that organizations have the ethical duty towards their employees to build up the right associations with their workers by paying living wages. The Utilitarianism framework resonates with me considering the overall economic advantage of paying living wages, which in return increased productivity, quality, and innovation all of which add to enormous profits for both employer and employee – thereby contributing to the common good.

The minimum wage in America has been an ongoing issue for many underpaid workers across the country for years. The debate of the minimum wage raise has been around since the raise in 2007 when it was raised from $5.85 to $7.25, which is where it currently stands. Recently, there have been suggestions in Congress to raise the minimum to $15 per hour, this would be a significant change compared to the current $7.25. There has been no documentation or assembly to debate the matter but this raises the question, is $7.25 a liveable wage in modern-day America?

The minimum wage was established in 1938 from the Fair Standard Labor Act, also known as the FSLA. The FSLA established minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and youth employment standards affecting employees. They also govern child labor and overtime hours laws. They are a branch in the government to help dispute and bring changes to laws and regulations to everyone in America.

The minimum wage first started off at 40 cents per hour, then was raised to $1.00 in 1958. After this, it was raised multiple times. In 1961, it increased to $1.51, then $2.10 in 1975, $3.31 in 1980, $4.25 in 1995, $6.55 in 2007, and $7.25 which has been the wage since 2008. Since minimum wage began in 1938, there have been patterns of the minimum not being raised over a significant amount of time. Though prior reasons to increase the wage were economic growth, workers unions, or to stabilize economic downturns, it hasn’t been raised over the last decade though these factors continue to impact our market. As our economy is continuously changing due to the 2020 Covid-19 outbreak, it would be fair to say if there was a time to consider raising or changing the minimum wage it would be crucial to do it now, rather than in the future when the economy has a potential downward spiral.

There has been a bill brought to Congress about possibly raising the minimum wage for individuals with disabilities, but this is the only document that suggested the federal raise for anyone. Our current president, Joe Biden, is pushing for the minimum to be raised to $15 per hour. He currently has raised the minimum for federal workers and agencies to $15 per hour. If in fact the wage is raised to his suggested wage, it would be double the current minimum wage per hour. Since Joe Biden still has a great deal of time in office, a nation-wide wage raise is completely possible.

Congress is in charge of raising the minimum wage and without their authority, no laws or amendments are passed, so getting Congress to support the law would be highly difficult unless there would be premeditated safeguards that would come with it to prevent depression and inflation. Although it would take much effort to convince members of Congress to come to an agreement, it is only right to debate the matter for the American people.

Having as many people as possible on minimum wage would lower the need for public assistance, which will reduce the tax burden on communities and the state. This would need Congress’s approval to reduce any sudden changes or stressors on the economy. Although there would need to be compromises in certain areas like taxes, government budget cuts, school funding and other government priorities to effectively raise the minimum wage, there are alternative solutions to allow the raise of minimum wage.

Imposing the minimum wage on certain markets could potentially have good effects on the working class as it would improve the quality of jobs and workers. Markets like fast food and entry-level jobs would be the ideal area to raise the minimum wage because it provides equal opportunity for individuals without experience or a degree to obtain a livable income. Jobs that require higher education already have a smaller market due to the requirements and this alteration would provide the working class with more comparable wages.

In last year alone, 39 million people made less than $11 per hour—this is substantially low, especially by the direction our economy is heading right now. A staggering 21% of minimum wage workers are currently relying upon government assistance to survive in our current economy. Without government assistance, these people have to rely on $11 per hour to feed families, raise children, and pay for necessities while juggling bills, mortgages, and anything life throws their way. It is in the best interest of our nation for the government to help people in these situations, and raising wages could resolve this issue without people heavily relying on government assistance.

Raising the minimum wage could possibly help 38 million Americans that suffer from poverty. Since 2019, 3.3 million Americans have become impoverished. This raise could help struggling families and poverty-stricken areas around the United States not only survive in their current situation but thrive. The goal isn’t to give a quick-fix solution for those suffering from poverty, but rather to ensure a brighter future for those who are unfortunate enough to get into that situation.

Inequality has been a major problem in American History, specifically the pay gap between men, women, and minors. On average, women have made 93 cents for every dollar a man of the same age earned from recent studies in 2019. Inequality is most apparent in higher-paying jobs and markets, and these raises could close the gap to provide more fair wages for everyone. Minors are also, at times, looked at as unequal. In low-level, minimum wage jobs minors are often taken advantage of in poor working conditions because most adults are unable to pay their bills on a minimum wage income, leaving minors to take these positions. More often than not, employers do not give minors the benefits that they would give adult employees. Since minors don’t receive insurance benefits, the minimum wage for the types of positions they hold should be raised. It is only reasonable since employers don’t have to provide the benefits which are significantly cost-effective for them.

Raising the minimum wage would reduce the tax burden on the state and federal government, as some people who make the minimum are forced to use food stamps, welfare, and rent assistance. It would decrease the number of people who are forced to use these services because of the low wage. Tax cuts could potentially put the economy on an incline because there would be more money circulating.

With the rise of minimum wage comes the possibility of inflation, which means our economy would be in a decline and the prices of things would fluctuate because people are making more money to buy the product and there isn’t enough to supply so they raise the price. In the U.S., inflation is already creating a problem. Gas prices have skyrocketed because the oil industry took a big hit during the beginning of Covid-19. This is an example of how inflation could affect lower-class families and workers.

Another effect of raising the minimum wage is layoffs, in certain job markets. It may be necessary to make layoffs, which could potentially increase the poverty rate, unemployment rate, and increase the number of people who are aided by government assistance. The whole point of having a higher minimum wage is to create better opportunities for lower-class workers, but if the raising of the minimum wage would cause layoffs, it would be entirely counterproductive, and would overall leave the lower-class workers at a complete disadvantage with an even harder job market to get into while having to rely on government assistance.

If employers decided to not make layoffs, there is a possibility that they would just put roadblocks in the way of obtaining employer-provided insurance and benefits. Since they are paying their employees more, it would be unethical to do as people that need the insurance and benefits and would be left to deal with it themselves. Benefits like vacation time, personal leave, and bonuses may not be paid or provided, and employers wouldn’t feel the need to incentivize these things if the employees are already making higher wages. Ultimately, this would leave workers frustrated even though they got the raise, which leaves it at an unfair compromise, as employees would feel that employers are treating them unfairly, but in reality, it would be one of the trade-offs that they would be forced to make as a business.

People who would come in for jobs without experience or degrees would be at a disadvantage because employers are going to be more prompted to hire higher educated and certified workers. This would make the job market extremely competitive and overall leave more people unemployed due to degrees and experience which would raise the unemployment rate. This would make more people forced to collect unemployment and other government benefits which would overall raise taxes. Also, it would force people to pursue said education and certifications, which would create more debt with an extremely competitive job market, overall leaving these degrees less valuable.

Small businesses would suffer because some businesses won’t have enough money to meet the new demands by the government and be forced to lay off employees, in turn, this would leave the small businesses with two choices, lay off employees and have to work the business by themselves, which would be a very challenging task, or try to pay the minimum wage and risk going broke and having their business go under or in debt due to the wage. Small businesses would be the biggest hit in the economy if the wages were raised substantially higher, they would be heavily taxed because when an employee’s salary is raised, the employer’s taxes raise as well, this would overall leave the businesses on the short end of the stick with few options left for themselves.

With a possible rise of the minimum wage, there is the potential for decreased government spending due to an influx of tax dollars paid into the government as well as a decreased need for public services. The public services that many citizens currently need that are provided by the government are funded by taxpayer dollars. If fewer citizens don’t need services or assistance, it may be possible to completely scrap some of these public services or fund them less because it isn’t in as high of a demand. One disadvantage to decreasing public services, however, is that people who rely on these services due to being unemployed or disabled may have to deal with program cutbacks as well. Fewer benefits could affect poverty-stricken communities and areas that have a higher unemployment rate. If the government could find a balanced solution, this could have a good outcome for people who do and don’t use public services and assistance.

There have been few alternative solutions that supporters of raising the minimum wage or Congress have proposed that do not have a potential negative impact on American business owners, but it should be considered that raising the minimum wage could leave small businesses out to dry. When a worker’s salary is increased, so are the employer’s taxes and the cost of running their business. A viable solution to counter this negative impact on small businesses would be to give tax cuts that would be beneficial to both the employer and employee. Another potential downside to raising the minimum wage would be that employers may resort to automation, which could potentially put 1.4 million Americans out of work. This trickle-down effect wouldn’t be ideal for the working class. Tax cuts may be a solution in this case as well.

To prevent these negative impacts, the minimum wage could be adjusted to the cost of living in different states and areas. For example, “The cost of living in New York is 129% higher than the national average” (Kaushal). With the average minimum in New York areas being around 10 dollars an hour, it makes it extremely hard for people working in those areas, having that high of a cost of living to reside there. Adjusting the minimum to the cost of living would be more ideal so that the economy wouldn’t inflate as much, but at the same time, there would be better wages that correspond with the area that you live in. Overall, Americans would benefit from increased wages, and we, as the people, should be able to live a better life with much fair, liveable income.