Category: Conflict

Essay on Conflicts in ‘Night’

Elie faces many internal and external conflicts during the book ‘Night’. He not only faces the challenges and problems within himself but as well as battling external disputes while in the concentration camp. Consistently, Elie had to make tough choices to not only help himself survive but to protect his father. Throughout the book ‘Night’, Elie experiences trial and error while playing a game of survival of the fittest.

Throughout the book, the author Elie Wiesel records many examples of the different types of character vs self conflicts you read about in ‘Night’. In the book, Elie’s first encounter with internal conflict was when Moshe the Beadle escaped from the Gestapo and made his way back to Sighet. He told his story about the horrors he had witnessed but nobody believed him. Elie even questioned himself at one point whether he should attempt to understand Moshe’s point of view, but instead of believing him, he only ended up pitying him. For instance in ‘Night’, the book states “I did not believe him myself. I would often sit with him in the evening after service, listening to his stories and trying my hardest to understand his grief. I felt only pity for him (pg 6).” Elie’s next internal/external conflict is in chapter 2 when Madame Schachter is yelling at the cattle cars. It is an external conflict because Eliezer is trying his hardest to ignore her due to the fact that her yelling and causing chaos inside the vehicle is annoying him. Readers sense Wiesel’s distress when the book states, “Our nerves were breaking at this point…We could stand it no longer. (pg 19)” Madame Schachter’s screaming on the train is also an internal conflict because at some points they started to believe her, and even if it was only for a moment I believed they started to wonder who really was going crazy. As the memoir progresses, Elie also has a war with himself about the topic of his father. As Eliezer’s father gets sicker and closer to death, Elie compares his father to a dead weight. For instance, the book states, “Don’t let me find him! If only I could get rid of this dead weight so that I could use all my strength to struggle for my own survival (pg 77).” Elie feels as if his father is a burden to him but he doesn’t want to admit it, and even feels very ashamed for thinking such thoughts. Overall, Elie experiences and faces many internal struggles as the story progresses.

In the book ‘Night’, Elie also has to face external conflicts as well. An example of this would be when Elie has to travel through cold weather in chapter 6. For example, when the book states “The idea of dying, of no longer being, began to fascinate me (pg 63).” readers figure that during the march in the cold weather, something altered Elie’s way of thinking. Realization sets in when Elie points out that he no longer desires to live, or had no reason to “I was walking in a cemetery, among stiffened corpses (pg 65).” The preceding external conflict is when the Jews are no longer able to wear gold, jewelry, or any items holding valuables. Everything that was required was to be handed over to the authorities or you were exterminated. Jews were also forced to wear the Star of David. Another conflict that is both internal and external that affects Elie again has to do with his father. In chapter 8 Elizer’s father won’t move/get up because he has already chosen to die (pg 77). It is internal because Elie feels as if he is battling his father’s death rather than his actual father, but it is also external due to Elie yelling at his father to get up, warning him that people who stay there never get back up. External conflict is also represented in the book on the Wagon. Elie remembers this scene because he remembers it as a stampede, and a massacre, for bread. For instance, the book states, “Dozens of starving men fought each other to the death for a few crumbs. The German workmen took a lively interest. (pg 73)” Years later after this scene, when Elie witnessed a fiasco close to what he experienced, he begged the lady to stop doing the same thing which was one of the many factors that traumatized him for life. Generally, Wiesel recorded many different types of external conflicts throughout the book. 

Conflicts in ‘The Things They Carried’ Essay

“Once people are dead, you can’t make them undead” (O’Brien 39). In The Things They Carried written by Tim O’Brien, the author mainly depicts the American soldier’s life in Vietnam during the Vietnam War. In 1954, the U.S., under the Eisenhower Administration, became involved in the Vietnam Conflict. However, controversies about whether America should get involved in Vietnam began rising as the conflict intensified. Likewise, O’Brien describes the dispute that was going on within the country in the 1960s. “The very facts were shrouded in uncertainty…The only certainty that summer was moral confusion” (38). Despite this contention, the United States was not justified in getting involved in the Vietnam Conflict because the government misguided the public and the people opposed the intervention.

Vietnam is a Communist country located in Southeast Asia, but it was ruled by different types of governments in previous eras. Since the 19th century, the country had reigned under French rule until Japan took it over during World War II. Yet after the new host lost the war in 1945, Vietnam was returned to the French Empire. The North Vietnamese, who demanded the liberation of Vietnam, started a war with France afterward, and the latter was eventually defeated. This also gave rise to the South Vietnamese power. In addition, as a result of the war, The Geneva Accord of 1954 said that Vietnam was “partitioned into North and South” parts (Edidin 181). Then, conflicts between the two districts began generating.

The U.S. originally started getting involved in the conflict in 1954 when military advisors were sent by the government to help the South Vietnamese Army (Edidin 181). In 1956, the fierce conflict began as America acknowledged the independence of the South Vietnamese. Eight years later, the U.S. escalated the war because of the conflict in the Gulf of Tonkin (“Tonkin Gulf”). After years of ruthless battles, the Nixon Administration signed the peace agreement with the North Vietnamese on January 17, 1973, and all the American troops were withdrawn from Vietnam within 12 days, announcing America’s final stage in the conflict.

William Timothy “Tim” O’Brien had attended the “war” in person. He was born on October 1, 1946, in Austin, MN. During his younger age, O’Brien wasn’t good at playing sports, instead, he spent “a great deal of time in the Noble’s County Library” to satisfy himself (Mahini et al.). In 1968, before he received his draft to go to the war, he acquired his Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science from Macalester College. Though he was strongly against this war at first, he eventually committed himself to the 23rd Infantry Division in Vietnam after giving up the idea of fleeing to Canada. He spent 14 months in Vietnam as a soldier and finally became a sergeant. After returning from the war, he devoted himself to political studies at Harvard University while taking “medication to combat his depression and the double trauma that made him contemplate suicide” (Mahini et al.). Not only did he once work as a reporter for the Washington Post, but he also became a fiction writer which brought him plenty of literary rewards. One of his famous works was The Things They Carried in which he highlighted the Vietnam Conflict. This also raises the question of whether America had a justified reason to join the “war” or not.

Nonetheless, the U.S. was not justified in getting herself involved. First and foremost, the government had misguided the American public. On August 2, 1964, the North Vietnamese attacked two American vessels in the Gulf of Tonkin located in international water. Some people believed that the U.S. should join the conflict because they had to protect their military (“Tonkin Gulf”). According to Walter Cronkite, a famous American reporter, the Tonkin Gulf Resolution drafted by Congress had granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the “authority to conduct the war as he saw fit” (110). However, this was a political scheme exerted by the government to figure out a justified reason for the country to join the “war”. The first flaw was the time difference between the two subjects: the resolution was drafted six months before the actual Tonkin Gulf Incident took place (“Tonkin Gulf”). In addition, the article also points out that it was America who provoked the North Vietnamese to open fire on U.S. vessels by assisting the South Vietnamese to secretly attack the North. Therefore, the argument that the U.S. should join the conflict because of the Tonkin Gulf Incident was invalid.

In addition, President Lyndon B. Johnson’s leadership was mostly self-centered. During the 1964 presidential election, he had claimed to the public that he would get American troops out of Vietnam. However, he deceived his people because he still kept the armies fighting in Vietnam in the following years (“Tonkin Gulf”). Also, according to Richard Brownell, a history writer, Johnson made decisions mostly based on his thinking and hardly listened to counterviews (42). Even though Johnson told the Under Secretary of State, George Ball, to remain in the discussion group, the president simply wanted to pretend that he was willing to listen to opposite views while he was not (Brownell 47). Additionally, Cronkite believes that Johnson had taken the whole “war” personally because he kept thinking about taking all “his” armies and weapons into the battles in Vietnam(111). It was not the country’s military, but “his” own. Through many of his words and actions, Johnson’s self-oriented leadership had been incarnated.

Furthermore, the government had also attempted to ignore some official documents. Knowing that if a vote about whether the U.S. should declare war on Vietnam was carried out, the country would be scattered up, the government simply chose to eschew the vote, and this circumvention was a violation of the American Constitution (Getting Out). Also, Jerome Slater, a professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo, states that the U.S. government decided to cut Vietnam into two independent countries while The Geneva Accord only said that Vietnam was divided up “temporarily into two zones” instead of two separate nations (297). America had, therefore, neglected two crucial documents to interfere in the conflict in Vietnam, and these were unrighteous movements.

In addition to the government’s narrow leadership, the U.S. public’s opposition to the conflict was another evidence of why the country should not join the “war”. Some people believed that the country needed to stop Communism earlier, which was the motif of the Domino Theory before it became unstoppable because they had learned from the experience of Adolf Hitler’s insatiable requirements for lands in the previous World War (Frankel 294). The theory was inaccurate, however, because the Vietnam Conflict began as an indigenous movement until America started “international aggression” (Slater 296). The real intention of America, stated by Slater, was to “keep in power anti-communist military dictatorships” (298). Most importantly, the fact that instead of the whole of Southeast Asia, only two countries in the region–Laos and Cambodia–were ruled under Communism after Vietnam’s falling demonstrated America’s overestimation of the theory. Hence, the Domino Theory should not be the justified reason why the public hoped their country to fight in an indigenous war in Vietnam.

Moreover, the people of America were shocked by the colossal damages and casualties that occurred during the war. O’Brien wrote: “They burned everything. They shot chicken and dogs, they trashed the village well, they called in artillery and watched the wreckage” (15). Villages were destroyed by armies from both sides, but this was not the only ravage. Noncombatants were killed indiscriminately as well due to the use of massive artillery (Slater 299). Mahini and other researchers deemed that even though O’Brien never specifically mentioned that killing innocent civilians was illegal, this behavior was actually against the U.S. Law of War. Vietnam, as a whole, was grievously devastated as a result of the conflict. Jerome Slater claims that Vietnam was “a country that—regrettably—had to be destroyed to be saved” (299). In other words, the brutal armies and the crude battles had left prodigious impressions on Americans. Gradually, people’s rage boosted within the country, and the Tet Offensive played a significant role in the burst of resentment among Americans (Brownell 51). On January 30, 1968, the South Vietnamese and American troops were surprisingly under attack from the North Vietnamese Army. However, the southern allied power was able to fight back within eight weeks after their initial losses. Eventually, the South Vietnamese won the battle. Nevertheless, the victory proved almost nothing to the people in America. On the contrary, the public’s discontent grew dramatically because they saw no hope in the battles (Fonda A50). They were shocked that the North Vietnamese could still launch such a bulky attack after nearly a decade of fighting (Edidin 183). Therefore, it seemed like this “war” would be endless, and anti-Vietnam War protests had grown dramatically, attempting to get their country out of Vietnam. Above all, these boycotts served as another embodiment of the public’s indignation against the “war”.

Even though the Vietnam War has ended for decades already, it still has a profound influence on U.S. society. For instance, in 2004, President George W. Bush, under pressure from the public, had to give speeches about America’s involvement in the Iraq War because, according to Peter Edidin, an editor of the New York Times and a culture writer, they were worried that Iraq would become “another Vietnam” (180). Also, he claimed that the harm and deaths caused by the “war” would never be cured for the soldiers (180). One Army Major, Colin Powell, wrote that the “U.S. should fight a war only with decisive force and vital interests at stake” while this was not the case in the particular war in Vietnam (Fonda A50). Therefore, to avoid further tragedies, the countries should learn from history and prevent any war in the future.

Admittedly, America’s intervention in Vietnam has been controversial since the 1960s. Some believed that the country was justified in getting involved because of the “Red Scare” and the right to protect their armies after being attacked by foreign powers. However, this was not righteous because the government had ignored the public’s opposition and views. Accompanied by the exertion of political gimmicks, the presidents and the Congress made their own, one-sided decisions while telling lies to the public. This generated people’s resentment and rages. As the conflict intensified, more and more Americans realized its brutality and then protested. Unfortunately, they were shot down by the government. This war had incurred great damages and traumas to the lands and human beings, and here come the questions: How could a decision that had overlooked the public’s opinion be justified for the entire country, and how should the nations learn to prevent wars like this henceforth?

‘Rikki Tikki Tavi’ Essay on Main Conflict

Rudyard Kipling’s short story “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” presents a vivid exploration of the main conflict that drives the narrative—the intense clash between instinctual survival and territorial dominance. This critical essay delves into the complexities of this conflict, examining the roles of characters, the implications for the story’s themes, and the narrative’s broader implications for human nature.

Thesis Statement

The main conflict in “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” revolves around the battle of instincts—Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s innate survival drive versus the territorial dominance of the cobras Nag and Nagaina—underscoring the tension between primal instincts and the quest for territory.

Instinctual Survival

At the heart of the conflict lies the instinct for survival. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, a courageous mongoose, embodies this primal force as he enters the garden and becomes part of the human family’s life. His instinctual response to the cobras’ presence is immediate—a reaction honed by generations of mongoose survival. This instinctual drive fuels his determination to protect his newfound territory and the human family from the cobras’ malevolence.

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s instinctual nature transcends rational thought. His courage, quick reflexes, and resourcefulness in the face of danger illustrate the raw power of survival instincts. Kipling emphasizes that in the world of “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi,” instincts serve as guides, often truer and more reliable than conscious decisions.

Territorial Dominance and Conflict

Nag and Nagaina, the cobras, represent the territorial dominance that opposes Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s instinctual survival. Their presence poses a direct threat to the mongoose’s territory—the garden—and by extension, the human family. For the cobras, the garden represents their domain, a realm they are willing to defend at all costs.

The tension escalates as Nag and Nagaina’s territorial dominance clashes with Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s instinctual urge to protect. Their cunning tactics, manipulation, and threats to the human family mirror the territorial conflicts that arise among humans. This conflict highlights the parallels between the animal kingdom’s territorial struggles and the human experience.

Themes and Broader Implications

The main conflict intertwines with the story’s themes, offering deeper insights into nature, survival, and the inherent tensions within the animal world. Through Rikki-Tikki-Tavi and the cobras, Kipling addresses the balance between human intervention and the natural order. The mongoose’s relationship with the human family reflects the potential harmony between man and nature, while the cobras highlight the dangers of disruption.

Furthermore, the main conflict resonates with broader implications for human nature. It raises questions about the inherent tension between instinctual drives and the pursuit of dominance in human interactions. The narrative prompts readers to reflect on the primal forces that shape their own actions and decisions, inviting contemplation of the complexities of human behavior and motivations.

Conclusion

In “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi,” Rudyard Kipling crafts a story that centers around the entwined conflict of instincts and territoriality. The tension between Rikki-Tikki-Tavi’s survival-driven instincts and Nag and Nagaina’s territorial dominance propels the narrative forward, exploring the primal forces that dictate actions in both the animal kingdom and the human world.

Through this conflict, Kipling engages readers in a deeper understanding of instinctual survival and territorial struggles, shedding light on the innate forces that drive behavior. By inviting readers to ponder the tension between primal instincts and the quest for dominance, “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” serves as a thought-provoking exploration of the intricacies of human nature and the animal kingdom.

Divorce Infidelity Effects Essay

This systematic review examines family conflicts and young adults’ behaviors, focuses on distrust and divorce, and affects the nature of these conflicts. Literature review information delivered proves that domestic fights can upsurge the chances of offspring carrying out risky manners. Attachment hurts the genre, and can also affect the success of future relationships. Affirmative results can also make the product of the clan struggle as per capita parting an unpleasant atmosphere or else defending safe affix numbers as a steady parent.

Targeted literature has been identified; 25 articles and information that affect family conflicts.

The research has a positive impact on the confrontational nature of the conflict and reduces the potential adverse effects on family conflicts.

A further subject across the research was that the clash, and conflict of the traditional patterns and children often followed generations of their behavior.

Research, relationship patterns have changed over time, and when it comes to conflicts, it’s important to develop effective repairs when communicating with family partners, or communicating with others with children.

Finally, family conflicts are often highly adaptable and strong in family conflicts, and the negative impacts such as the possible conflicts in the negative conflicts and the likelihood of patterns can be reduced.

The study will be a Quantitative Research, an online survey. Online survey services to create, distribute, and analyze the increasingly popular way. A study of the teacher you create using your study permit and various types of questions (multiple choice, rating scale, bottom-down menus, etc.). Available options need, to answer any question skip logic flow control containing the custom, and even randomize answer options allow you to carry out.

Survey data collection uses surveys to collect information from specific respondents. Surveys can replace or supplement other data collection types, including data collection, interviews, focus groups, and more.

The Questionnaires used in this study will be adapted to suit the adults and their situation. The measure Index of Parental Attitude (IPA) has been a standard questionnaire used worldwide (Hudson, Wung & Borges, 1980). The statements on the questionnaires (positive & negative) are from the original measure Index of Parental Attitude (IPA) by (Hudson, Wung & Borges, 1980).

IPA was used in another similar study to identify the parental attitude and stress among parents and grandparents. Hence the seemingly negative questions are a part of the original questionnaire by the author (Hudson, Wung & Borges, 1980).

Introduction:

During several years, a major study and experimental trial have made their future functioning as the children’s opinion, and the elderly about family conflicts. These family conflicts include divorce, blurred parents, parents’ negligence, parental confrontation, and other misconduct. (Platt, Nalbone, Casanova, & Wetchler, 2008).

The main cause of domestic fights is split-up. The main reason for divorce is the cross-cultural background (Lansford, 2009).

Children involved in family conflicts may have significant effects. Similarly, parents’ unfaithfulness and divorce do not always exist and can have a strong impact taking place on offspring and their forthcoming interfaces with grownups. Parental battles, such for instance parents’ unbelief and divorce, often lead to corrupt and hazardous performances, feeble, fragile attachment styles, and mutual relationships.

For the current period and in the impending for children of these families. (Sori, 2007).

This study is a methodical appraisal of what is presently recognized as the effects of separation. Offspring is reckless, especially family and special powerful prophets rival collected works.

Separation is predominant in the States in the present day as above 50% of matrimonies finish in conclusion and 50% of youngsters will be compacted by divorce (Lansford, 2009). Investigators have revealed that annulment is vital for offspring to learn psycho-social influences. Occasionally, unprotected attachment styles, behavioral issues, health guesswork, perception and social disadvantage, psychological stress, poor educational achievement, weak self-concepts, etc. (Crowell, Treboux, & Brockmeyer, 2009). It is much expected that kids who face a household struggle as divorce will be separated, and detached as adults. Correspondingly, the catastrophe of separation may influence the imminent as more or less mature offspring have said they’re a different person after their parents got separated. (Fish, Pavkov, Wetchler, & Bercik, 2012). Domestic battles can collaborate with the well-being of young adults and lead to uncertain behavior.

A written relationship is encountered between family conflicts and vulnerable children in juvenile and adult children. (Fish, Pavkov, Wetchler, & Bercik, 2012). Wellbeing compromises and perilous comportments contain a mass of deeds and dealings that may be extreme sipping, chain-smoking, consuming illegal drugs, and engaging in unsafe erotic behavior, such as unsafe sex or sexual relationships with multiple partners (Fish, Pavkov. Wetchler, & Bercik, 2012).

The researchers have pointed out that older children from divorced families have higher unemployment, less educational achievement, and more depression and anxiety. (Bachman, 2008).

There is a relationship between divorce and mistrust. Unfaithful couples have many divorces, and reactions may arise between children. (Lansford, 2009).

Conflicts and risk behaviors can develop between children and adolescents due to family conflict. It will lead to conflicts in communication. (Thorson, 2009).

The study has shown that children’s knowledge of outsourced bonding is interacting with others and interacting with their partners. Poor communication skills can lead to bad borders. (Thorson, 2009).

Research has suggested that split-up and parent disloyalty involve a highly insecure linkage compared to people who have been raised in small family conflicts (Crowell, Treboux, & Brockmeyer, 2009).

In upcoming affairs, grownup teenagers are extra hopeless, Discontent, rage, and ruthlessness in their interactions. Those are the problems Properties of unsafe link styles (Sori, 2007).

Teenagers who have faced domestic battles like disloyalty and annulment have a great chance of learning wrong behavior; bad communication tactics and negative emotions should be revealed; And less likely to extend fight firmness (Crowell, Treboux, & Brockmeyer, 2009).

Generally, Aged children, offspring who have faced, troubles with household personal battles such as the parent’s disloyalty will be poorer in communication skills and upcoming associations are often due to struggle. Disclosure to deprived communication methods, parting from a parent, as well as further aspects.

Social workers ought to be alarmed about domestic fights affecting offspring and adult, youngsters are different reasons. As an example, research has shown more children are anxious when dealing with their parents’ needs (Thorson, 2009). They took action, unsafe sexual health compromise, and participation procedures, the habit of illegal drugs and alcohol consumption (Sori, 2007).

Family conflicts such as separation and unfaithfulness can develop unsafe adjectives and relational brawls. This behavior at odds with others in future relations leads to conflicts. (Ben Ami & Baker, 2012).

These relationships positively affect social relationships Knowledge and understanding of family conflicts. Children who engage in family conflicts may face professional problems and 50% of children are divorced; Many more children are exposed to their parents’ Unbelievers. Infidelity and divorce because parents can cause the suffering of individual dynamics. Positive coping strategies and interventions regarding the additional knowledge and provide their customers with better quality of service. Research question: the consequences of family conflict for the children and their future mutual infidelity, divorce, and what adults using two concrete examples and sources of conflict are like. In literature, mostly because of the presence of two pairs I choose (Lansford, 2009). Under these conditions, the youth and family work with industry what determine the potential for interventions that can be used to find more information about this topic I study.

Family conflicts and infidelity, couples, and individual experiences sometimes adult parents, infidelity, and other child or family conflict refer to a connection. Couples and family effects on infidelity and family conflict, there is some research to show (Lansford, 2009). This systematic review, of family conflict experienced by victims, especially children, when the emerging themes and professional consensus of current and relevant experience to see transpire research review. Existing research, independent variables or ‘reasons’ and their potential impact, such as divorce and infidelity themes with the focus of (1) current risk behaviors, (2) and then adult connection and relational issues, and (3) their influence fidelity on children, as well as a family conflict when other related behaviors may occur.

Literature Review:

Parents and their children close emotional bond the researchers to understand the same assumptions and settings by using the close relations of adults’ conscious can review (Ehrenberg, Robertson, & Pringle, 2012). The theory of attachment relationships, communicating with each other, and helping to understand mental satisfaction provides the theoretical framework. The primary relationship between infant and caregiver Bowlby study focused on (Bowlby, 1980). Link by link, different forms of research development. This forms a secure connection, anxiety, avoidance, resistance, ambivalent/irregular enclosure, Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth and colleagues generated by the impact of the link research, today (Bloch & Guillory, 2011). In the end, the adult in relationships how to link theory is to see that research was done. 1987 (Shi, 2003) for example of this research, in Hazan and Shaver has been completed. These teachers’ grownup interactions and child affairs, share comparable structures to know that. These features, when a Deputy is nearby, include a safe and secure feeling and close physical contact, and the other feeling insecure, and when accessing each other a mutual fascination and interest (Shi, 2003). Due to this impact, Hazan and Shaver aged infant-caregiver relationships love relationship similar to those (Shi, 2003). At present, the adult attachment interview (AAI) how age and age relate to the style (Shi, 2003). Infidelity or divorce between the parents, and the family, such as conflicts, while the warmth and overall involvement of parents with children is low. Its height may cause unsafe attachments (Ben-Ami, 2012 & Baker). Individuals with family conflict experience what interventions to treat the best it is important to know what the intervention policy of annexation, is rooted in this very important knowledge and expertise, connection insecurities individuals for best effects, and therapists can create their relations to improve connection helps insecurities help very useful and positive connections with others to enhance this relationship more successful growth it will lead to.

Essay on Conflict in ‘The Crucible’

The Crucible was a book about the Salem witch trials. In the book, possibly any sin made could cause anyone to be considered a witch. Many people in life make mistakes and we typically learn from them. While people go through these trials, they usually deal with internal and external conflicts. In Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, John Proctor undergoes several changes as he grapples with personal and moral dilemmas. Proctor develops over time, he changes from a sinner to a tragic hero when he goes through trial Proctor is a character who has good qualities but makes mistakes like anyone else. Proctor committed adultery, which caused him to struggle with himself. This was most likely due to the cost of him being a Christian. John is hurting due to the mistake he has made. In Act 2 the quote God help me, I lusted and there is a promise in such sweat.̈ shows that although the thought of this sin is forever stuck with him, he is very courageous for admitting to what he has done. Proctor changes to display his morals, even though it might be too late.

The quote can also present internal conflict. He struggles with his thoughts, such as what he would do if the secret got out. He’s afraid of what the church and community members might think. John Proctor forgives himself and then finds his moral integrity. Telling the truth in public is one way Proctor dealt with external conflict and internal conflict. During court, Proctor must decide whether to put himself at risk by testing the belief in witchcraft. If he does this, he would be going against the church leaders. The community might lose their positive thoughts on him if he chooses to do so. This is a great example of man vs. man. The internal parts come in when he is put in the situation of deciding whether to speak on his thoughts or to keep quiet for the sake of staying alive and keeping his reputation in the church. Proctor overcomes his internal conflict and speaks of his beliefs. In court, he speaks against Abigail.

John Proctor reveals the truth even if it means criticizing the investigators. In the quote “Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang! How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!”, John is explaining how his name is too valuable for him to give up. He does confess to having dealings with the devil. John knows if he doesn’t agree, it might affect his reputation. His refusal has him put to death. In the quote, John realizes he is a good man, even with the mistakes he has made. He overcomes internal conflict and doesn’t let this mistake get the best of him. Proctor died feeling like a good person who was free of lies. John Proctor could be considered a man of courage. Although he starts as a good person he is also a sinner, and he then changes throughout the story. He speaks on his faults and by doing so he is condemned to death, but even after this, he regains his positive look. Proctor can now be looked at as a man of integrity in his moral position.

Essay on ‘The Giver’ Conflict

The Giver is about a young man named Jonah and his journey to find the truth. Jonah is the protagonist throughout the story, he’s 11 years old and different from a lot of other kids. He’s thoughtful and caring, and he is chosen to be the new receiver of memory which is a great title to have in their community. The antagonist throughout the story is society itself. Society wants everyone to act and be a certain way, because different is bad. Jonah has to overcome what society thinks to reach his full potential. The Giver is a minor character, but he helps Jonah reach his full potential, and learn the truth about “the society”. Lastly, we have Fiona, one of Jonah’s friends. Feelings are bad, and once Jonah realizes he has feelings for her, so many things change.

“The Giver” is based on a futuristic society where nothing bad ever happens, hate, war, and prejudice don’t exist. When kids grow up their given a place in society, and a job is chosen for them. You also get paired with a partner once you’re of age. Jonah is the main character of the story, and from an early age he’s different from the rest of the kids. On the day that his job is given to him, he gets chosen as the receiver of memory. This is a high job in the community and it’s very special. The Giver teaches Jonah all about the past and the truth about the society, and its too much for Joto to take in. Jit’sh devises a plan to leave society behind and go learn about the real world. Jonah’s friends Asher and Fiona along with The Giver help him with his escape. Jonah takes along with him a baby named Gabriel because he wants to have company ad give him a chance at a better lie. After all, society is going to k. After all,ff because he didn’t acquire that. After all, to stay in the community.

One of the main conflicts in “The Giver” is when Jonas starts receiving troublesome memories from The Giver, there is too much to bare and it pains him physically and morally. After he retains those memories, he realizes how much he doesn’t want to stay within the society anymore. Another conflict is when Jonah’s father takes in a baby named Gabriel, and Jonah gets attached to the baby. The baby isn’t healthy enough to stay in the community, so he will get “released”, the thought of this hurts Jonah so badly and gives him yet another reason to leave. The last conflict is when Jonah finally leaves. He’s hunted down for days at a time by people and search planes. Nobody had left the society in centuries, so this wat normalfort for all. These three conflicts are really important to the story because they give Jonah a reason to leave the community and to keep on fighting. While the search planes looked for him Jonah experienced things he’d never experienced before like hunger, coldness, and just in general scared. They shaped him into a survivor.

The character Fiona, is a minor character, although the author, could of explored Fiona Jonah’snahs relationship more than he didJonah’sr backstory could of created something a lot more meanhavegful, and it would of given him more reason to stay with society. The book itself is really interesting and keeps you on your toes. The one thing I would change about the book would be the ending, it leaves you on a huge cliffhanger so you never really know what happens.

Essay on Conflict in ‘The Great Gatsby’

The 1920s, known as the Jazz Age and the Roaring ‘20s, was a decade of great prosperity, booming businesses, the rise of the middle class, and the beginning of new ways to spend leisure time through dancing, nightclubs, and saloons. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald explores the interactions and conflicts between the divisions of the upper class. The first branch, “new money,” includes wealthy people who flaunt their riches and lack social graces, such as Gatsby. On the contrary, “old money” embodies the class of people, such as Tom and Daisy Buchanan, who were born into their wealth, are well aware of money’s abilities, and have a subtle elegance and morality to their character. Fitzgerald reshapes the reader’s broad perspective on the upper class by exploring the specific tensions that arise between ‘old money’ families that have built up powerful and influential social connections to hide their wealth and superiority behind a shield of civility and the ‘new money’ class whose recent prosperity has resulted in the absence of social connections and the tendency to overcompensate for their careless behavior with extravagant displays of wealth.

In The Great Gatsby, money is a tremendous motivator in the characters’ relationships, inspirations, and outcomes. Money within wealthy couples is a huge factor in the validity of the marriage, and thus problems arise when love interests are spread over two distinct and territorial branches of the upper class. Gatsby comes to realize that members of the “old money” class, especially Daisy, will always have money at the forefront of their desires because it has always been the backbone of their happiness when he says, “‘Her voice is full of money,’ he said suddenly. ‘That was it. I’d never understood before. It was full of money—that was the inexhaustible charm that rose and fell in it, the jingle of it, the cymbals’ song of it?’” (Fitzgerald 120). Daisy and Gatsby are both wealthy, but it is Gatsby who can not find satisfaction with the money. Gatsby accomplished his goal of becoming wealthy, but his happiness is in Daisy. However, his money is not enough for Daisy, and she chooses to remain with her husband Tom, whom she feels more financially and emotionally stable with. Through Gatsby, Fitzgerald reveals that although one may have all the money in the world, it is never enough to keep tension and strain out of a relationship. It seems unusual to analyze a wealthy couple having relationship problems, as people wonder how can wealthy couples be unhappy in their relationships when they have access to anything and everything. However, people within marriages may have gotten married to their significant other for the wrong reasons, such as for wealth, which prevents the formation of an important emotional connection in a relationship. As seen in the novel, materialistic ideas and dreams can create pressure between wealthy couples and leave a person lonely with the only thing that they worked hard for, their money, to take care of them.

The central conflict in The Great Gatsby pits the divisions of the upper class against one another, and Fitzgerald uses the settings of the novel to highlight the main differences between them. The majority of the action takes place between East Egg and West Egg, representations of the Hamptons in Long Island. Nick, the narrator of the novel, describes his home in comparison to the estates of the “old money” families by saying, “I lived at West Egg, the — well, the less fashionable of the two, though this is a most superficial tag to express the bizarre and not a little sinister contrast between them” (Fitzgerald 5). West Egg is where Gatsby lives, and it represents the flashing and loud nature of “new money.” Gatsby did not grow up with money like Daisy, rather he acquired it. Therefore, he does not know how to manage his money or how to engage in his elevated social sphere. Gatsby often looks out longingly over the bay toward Daisy’s house and the water that separates them physically is symbolic of the social and economic distance between them. In contrast to West Egg, Tom Buchanan describes his living conditions as he explains, “‘Oh, I’ll stay in the East, don’t you worry,’ he said, glancing at Daisy and then back at me as if he were alert to something more. ‘I’d be a God Damn fool to live anywhere else’” (Fitzgerald 10). East Egg represents “old money” tastes of luxury but restraint. Daisy lives in East Egg with her husband and, by putting her in another setting altogether from Gatsby, Fitzgerald illustrates how even with his wealth, Gatsby cannot be equal to her. The green light at the end of her bay is used to represent the values of the society in which she lives: money and greed.

Past, present, and future are periods that come back to haunt the upper class and bring anxiety to their life whether they represent “old money” or “new money.” Nick and Gatsby express these fears and confusion when they say, “‘I wouldn’t ask too much of her,’ I ventured. ‘You can’t repeat the past.’‘ Can’t repeat the past?’ he cried incredulously. ‘Why of course you can!’He looked around him wildly, as if the past were lurking here in the shadow of his house, just out of reach of his hand” (Fitzgerald 110). Nick and Gatsby are constantly troubled by time, as the past haunts Gatsby’s conscience, and the future weighs down on Nick’s mental stability. When Nick tells Gatsby that he can’t repeat the past and Gatsby says ‘Why of course you can!’ it reveals how Gatsby has dedicated his whole life to regaining and recreating a glorious and perfect past with Daisy. Fitzgerald describes Gatsby as, “overwhelmingly aware of the youth and mystery that wealth imprisons and preserves” (Fitzgerald 150), but Gatsby mixes up “youth and mystery” with history. He believes a single memorable month of love with Daisy can battle with the years and experiences she has partaken with Tom. Just as “new money” is money without social connection, Gatsby’s relationship with Daisy exists outside of history. Nick’s concerns about the future foreshadow the economic failure that plunged the country into depression and ended the Roaring ‘20s. The day Gatsby and Tom argue at the Plaza Hotel, Nick quickly recognizes that it’s his 30th birthday. He imagines the new decade before him as a sinister approaching road and sees the struggle between “old” and “new money,” the end of an era, and the destruction of both standards of wealth.

Throughout the novel, The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald explores the relationship between the two divisions of the upper class during the 1920s, “new money” and “old money,” and the conflicts that arise between them as they search to form relationships, remember the past, explore the present, and contemplate what their futures hold. He analyzes the journeys of his characters to redefine the reader’s image of wealth during this period and to reveal the extent to which money can buy happiness. Ultimately, Fitzgerald conveys how an image of optimism during a time of prosperity and greatness such as the Roaring ‘20s is not all it is set out to be

Essay on Conflict in ‘Macbeth’

Introduction:

The play Macbeth by William Shakespeare is a tragic and darkness-themed play that illustrates internal conflict within characters and paranoia. In this passage, we can see how Shakespeare tries to convey to the audience how Lady Macbeth is trying to manipulate Macbeth’s actions into the dark, which is the main theme of the play. Shakespeare uses a variety of sophisticated words and techniques to display Lady Macbeth’s anger and frustration with Macbeth. Lady Macbeth tries to force Macbeth into doing sinful actions, this then creates internal conflict within Macbeth since he has never imagined doing such things.

Main body paragraph 1:

In this passage, Shakespeare conveys how Lady Macbeth tries to manipulate Macbeth’s actions to the dark by using refined and complex techniques and words to give more power and emotion to the sentence. “Art thou afeared To be the same in thine own act and valor As thou art in desire?” We can tell that Lady Macbeth is testing Macbeth by asking him if he is afraid to kill King Duncan. Lady Macbeth is also asking Macbeth if he would rather gain the throne through his act of bravery (killing King Duncan) or wait for it and get it by cowardliness. This triggers Macbeth’s feelings towards gaining the throne. After Macbeth gets somewhat convinced into killing the king, he asks Lady Macbeth what would happen if they failed, and she replies “We fail! But screw your courage to the sticking place”. Not only does Lady Macbeth play games on Macbeth to manipulate his doings and convince him into killing the king, but she also then insults him by saying “Screw your courage” even after Macbeth has become convinced. Leaving Macbeth feeling awful by the last sentence makes him feel cheap and also reflecting on himself, he now knows he cannot back up because Lady Macbeth will be insulting him if he did. This is the turning point for Macbeth, this is when he starts to slightly change into the dark just like Lady Macbeth.

Main body paragraph 2:

After Lady Macbeth’s verbal assault, Macbeth feels extremely rough, this is when he starts to have an internal conflict with himself, wanting to turn back into the light but at the same time cannot because of Lady Macbeth. We can see attempts from Macbeth to back out of doing the sinful actions Lady Macbeth is convincing him to do. “If we should fail?”, Macbeth asks Lady Macbeth what would happen if they fail, she quickly realizes his attempt at backing out and replies with ‘We fail!”. This makes Macbeth feel disappointed since she did not give a straight answer, This also displays how Lady Macbeth has turned completely into the dark and not only does not care about what happens to her husband if he gets caught but also what happens to her. Also since she realizes Macbeth’s attempt at backing out, she then says “And we’ll not fail” to keep Macbeth’s hopes up of not failing and to keep in mind the fact that they are not going to fail, although Lady Macbeth is unsure of that, but she does not want him to back out.

Main body paragraph 3:

The last paragraph brings me to the point that Lady Macbeth does not care about Macbeth and herself and does not share the same concerns as Macbeth. Throughout this passage, lady Macbeth does not even think about the negatives that may face her and her husband, she does not think about backing out. “We will proceed no further in this business,” Macbeth says, telling Lady Macbeth he will not kill the king, however, this is before Lady Macbeth starts to talk back to him, convincing him to do the sinful actions she wants him to do. “And wakes it now, to look so green and pale” on Lady Macbeth’s side, she is telling Macbeth that he has woken up so green and pale and full of light. This is where Lady Macbeth plays games with Macbeth and tells him “From this time Such I account thy love”, she is telling Macbeth that he doesn’t love her although Macbeth loves her more than anything else in the world, lady Macbeth knows that in mind, she uses it as a way to to get him to listen to her and do what she wants. She uses this sentence to get him into the dark side she is on since she knows that he is concerned, and she does not care about what happens to him. However, Macbeth does not know that Lady Macbeth does not care about him, and he thinks that she is telling him to do these actions for the greater good and his favor.

Conclusion:

To conclude, This all relates to the fact that Lady Macbeth is clearly expressed by Shakespeare as a manipulating and controlling character within this part of the play, as she can make Macbeth commit the murder of King Duncan for her through multiple points and phrases within the play by insulting his masculinity, his leadership and his courage to act such as this one. Throughout the figurative language and dramatic techniques used, Shakespeare can give the viewers a basic, yet clear view on an illustration of Lady Macbeth’s personality and ethics.   

Cultural Conflict Essay on ‘The Namesake’

 “Not all plants, let alone humans, survive transplantation, and, as Lahiri’s stories show, for some the process of transplantation is impossible or irremediably damaging”(Ambreen Hai). Identity is always difficult for everyone, but being culturally displaced, as immigrants are just adds to the pressure of fitting in. Or even more so for those who grow up in two worlds at the same time. The book The Namesake by Jhumpa Lahiri, explores the ideas of identity, the clash of cultures, isolation, the importance of names, and family. Both of the Ganguli parents, especially Ashima, and their son Gogol, struggle with assimilating to this new culture. Ashima and Gogol are parallel characters because of Ashima’s sentiment of alienation in the United States, and how that emotion is similarly adopted by Gogol.

Ashima had known from the beginning that America was not the place for her. Throughout her pregnancy, she feared having to raise Gogol in “a country where she is related to no one, where she knows so little, where life seems so tentative and spare”(6). When Gogol is born, she loathes how her child is far from her family, and away from all she is familiar with. Worried for her baby’s childhood and growing up “She has never known of a person entering the world so alone, so deprived.’ (p.25) The moment Ashima and Ashoke are home from the hospital, she says to him; “I don’t want to raise Gogol alone in this country. It’s not right. I want to go back. (33)” Throughout her life she is at war with the pain of being unwanted and alone, which is common in people’s lives as “People in diaspora encounter cultural conflicts when they have to leave their cultural values and practice the new ones”(Hamid Farahmandian). The cultural conflicts come from people being unfamiliar with other cultures because of them, these people with different lifestyles are out of the ordinary, so they are judged and looked at differently. “Therefore, they feel distracted and lost, nostalgic, and try to resist the discourse of power”(Hamid Farahmandian). Being seen as different from everyone around starts to increase negative thoughts such as depression, loneliness, and alienation as Ashima has. Everyday people, when switching to a new culture take on these hardships, Ashima is just another example of this factor. Before Ashima threw her final Christmas Party in the house on Pemberton Road. She ‘feels lonely suddenly, horribly, permanently alone, and briefly, turned away from the mirror, she sobs for her husband”(274). At that moment she felt ‘both impatience and indifference for all the days she still must live”(274). Ashima doesn’t want to be in Calcutta with her family or in the United States, both could be called home for her, but yet, she still seems out of place. By blood, she is a Bengalian but she’s been living in America for most of her life. By living in a split world, it appears to be hard for her to have a grasp on her true identity and where she belongs. Ashima shows that she has an ongoing sentiment of depression throughout her life, always being out of place, being unwanted, and producing thoughts of being permanently alone.

Gogol’s emotions are not only described as alienation but also by depression and cultural pressure. Gogol always found it very difficult to belong somewhere and always felt left out. When Gogol was little, he felt that his name was what alienated him;’ no one he knows in the world, in Russia or India or America or anywhere, shares his name. Not even the source of his namesake”(78). He doesn’t believe anyone would understand he’s worries because his emotions are isolating him to think so, this carries out all through his life. His isolation makes him think that he is the only one in the world going through the same emotions as him. But when in reality that’s just depression and isolation talking. Gogol’s marriage to Moushumi didn’t give him much more comfort to his worries. He would find little bits of Moushumi’s life with Graham hiding around the apartment. He starts having thoughts in his mind of him wondering if ‘he represents some sort of capitulation or defeat”(229). Gogol starts feeling like the only reason Moushumi married him is because she has given up on life. Giving dissatisfaction in their marriage for both of them. Gogol’s feelings progressed during adulthood as they should, but he took a turn for the worst as he started falling deeper into sadness like his mom did.

Gogol and Ashima have very different experiences in the world but are still connected. Ashima’s unhappiness is caused by: homesickness, discomfort in a new country, and loneliness. Even more so when the customs that are important to her are pushed to the side to help her children fit in with American culture like “the birth of Christ, an event the children look forward to far more than the worship of Durga and Saraswati”(59). Ashoke and Ashima decided that for the sake of their children, they would adopt American customs out of pressure, and fear of their children being cast out because of their family’s culture. The parents’ choice played a large role in Ashima’s feelings of homesickness and her missing the things her culture celebrated. But for others, like Gogol, unhappiness stems from not fitting in. Regardless of the changes his parents made, his cultural differences are what set him apart from everybody else and caused his insecurities towards himself. “He’s come to hate questions about his name, hates having constantly to explain”(49). People asking him his name and the meaning only serves as a reminder that he is different from everyone else and he can’t change it. Gogol also begins struggling with his culture because “He hates having to tell people it means nothing ‘in Indian’” (49). Gogol is unusually self-conscious about his name, particularly in America. In America, Gogol is an uncommon name, which leads Americans to ask the question what does it mean in Indian? Gogol would not struggle with his name if people would accept it for what it is; therefore, making him less self-conscious by not asking.

Both Ashima and Gogol are isolated and alienated from both Indian and American cultures. There isn’t a place in the world for them, not India or America. Alienation seeps into their relationships with their family and their lovers, causing all kinds of dissatisfaction,n and overall just their lives. Both Ashima and Gogol face Alienation in their lives. For Ashima, it was being homesick, and for Gogol, it was being self-conscious. Regardless of the reason though, they both seemed to fight through it their whole lives all because they were a part of two different cultures and felt the need to appease them both, instead of just being who they are. If they would have just lived their lives for them and their families, they would have lived a much happier life. 

Essay on Conflicts of ‘The Hunger Games’

The book “The Hunger Games” by Suzanne Collins is a fictional book that describes the horrendous state of the current society. The author uses metaphors to describe the class distinctions in society as well as the opulence and extravagance of the rich. Follows a young girl named Katniss Everdeen. She lives in a futuristic nation called Panem, which is run by an all-powerful government called the Capitol. Located in the center of Panem, the Capitol rules over a total of twelve districts that surround and serve the people living in the Capitol. Katniss lives in District Twelve, which is the poorest district filled with poverty. She struggles with providing for her family daily, while those living in the Capitol and other districts have an abundance of food and supplies. This division among the different groups, or the class system, can be divided into three separate parts, the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class.

The wealthiest class is the Capitol, which rules indefinitely over all of the districts. The districts must provide for the Capitol, and participate in the annual hunger games, which were created to “remind the districts how they are at their mercy”. Unlike the people of the districts, the Capitol people do not have to worry about not having enough food; they have an “endless banquet that has been set for them”. Katniss is awed by her large breakfast of eggs, hams, fried potatoes, and other delicacies during her stay in the Capitol, meaning that people there do not experience any shortage of food, while people from districts are starving. Secondly, people in the Capitol are more advanced in terms of technological developments. For example, Katniss takes a shower for the first time in her life during her visit to the Capitol. The people of the Capitol have been trained to think that “everything is about them” and are oblivious to the fact that others are suffering. The Capitol is therefore at the top of the class system.

The middle class consists of wealthy districts. Though they, like the poor districts, are obliged to follow the orders of the capitol, they are specially treated. They have enough food and material goods. They “have been fed and trained throughout their lives” and have never had to worry about not having anything like the less favored districts. The participants from the wealthy districts are well-fed and fitter for the game than those in the poor districts. They usually train for a longer time, which makes them comfortable in handling the weapons.

The lower class consists of poor districts. Katniss herself lives in District Twelve, the poorest of all the districts. In Panem, the class inequality and power structure cause people in the poorer districts and Capitol to follow the path of least resistance. Katniss forces herself not to cry when she sees Prim being chosen as a tribute and being led to the stage. She does not want to be perceived as a weak person participant. from the poorer districts, on the other hand, usually handle the weapons for the first time during the games; they are weak as they are malnourished and underfed. They do not have any prior pieces of training before the games. For Katniss especially, it is difficult to provide food daily. Katniss must spend “days hunting and gathering for this one meal”. For the poorest people in District Twelve, “it’s hard not to resent those who don’t have to sign up for the tesserae”, which is a grain given to those who are starving. But when given tesserae, the person’s name is entered a second time into the Hunger Games. Unlike the people in the capitol who spend all of their time trying to look fit, “in District 12, looking old is something of an achievement since so many people die early.”

The class system in The Hunger Games is set up into three different sections, the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class. The ruling upper class, the Capitol, is the most wealthy and both governs and controls the middle class, the wealthy districts, and the lower class, the other districts. The Capitol reminds the districts of their power with the annual Hunger Games. The author has been successful in capturing the present United States culture to show where the country is currently heading if things do not change. It will be a society where the rich are unmoved by the plight of the poor. They will be wasting all their time on entertainment and opulence.