Somethimg Similar to the follwoing outline: I. Introduction A. Brief overview of

Somethimg Similar to the follwoing outline:
I. Introduction
A. Brief overview of

Somethimg Similar to the follwoing outline:
I. Introduction
A. Brief overview of Ursula K. Le Guin’s novel The Dispossessed
B. Significance of the novel in exploring representations of gender
II. Gender Dynamics on Urras
A. Examination of traditional gender roles and expectations on Urras
B. Analysis of the impact of these gender dynamics on the characters
C. Discussion of the oppressive nature of rigid gender norms
III. Gender Dynamics on Anarres
A. Exploration of the fluid and non-binary construct of gender on Anarres
B. Examination of the societal implications and benefits of this alternative gender representation
C. Analysis of Shevek’s journey and his resistance against traditional gender roles
IV. Challenging Gender Norms
A. Discussion of how Le Guin challenges traditional gender norms through her narrative
B. Analysis of the portrayal of Shevek as a subversion of gender expectations
C. Examination of the novel’s invitation to readers to question and reimagine their understanding of gender
V. Conclusion

Example of Final Paper Topic Proposal: Thesis: In Pan’s Labyrinth, a story by Gu

Example of Final Paper Topic Proposal:
Thesis:
In Pan’s Labyrinth, a story by Gu

Example of Final Paper Topic Proposal:
Thesis:
In Pan’s Labyrinth, a story by Guillermo Del Toro, Magical Realism is used to explore the Fascism imposed upon the family of the plot’s protagonist, Ofelia.
Topic Sentence 1
Folktales are incorporated into the narrative to establish Magical Realism.
Supportive Quote:
“‘Mother explained to me the significance of the massive stones around the village and the ruins there’” (Del Toro 16).
Topic Sentence 2
The mandrake, and its personification, is a Magical Realism device utilized in the story.
Supportive Quote:
“The mandrake came to life under her bed and warned of the dictator coming to kidnap her” (Del Toro 35).
Topic Sentence 3
Magic becomes a way of thwarting Fascism in the story.
Supportive Quote:
“Ofelia was able to use her supernatural and mystical powers to combat the Fascists” (Milford 145).
In other words, your Proposal should include the following in outline form:
Thesis Statement
Topic Sentence 1
Quote to support Topic Sentence 1
Topic Sentence 2
Quote to support Topic Sentence 2
Topic Sentence 3
Quote to support Topic Sentence 3

Ideas to Postpone Apocalypse Essay Prompt Ailton Krenak’s short book does an int

Ideas to Postpone Apocalypse
Essay Prompt
Ailton Krenak’s short book does an int

Ideas to Postpone Apocalypse
Essay Prompt
Ailton Krenak’s short book does an interesting job textually making his arguments. For instance
he uses a number of false analogies to make his points, (I don’t mean to poison the well!) but his
writing style also embodies one of his points: different ways of thinking necessitate different
ways of argumentation. How did you enjoy reading it? Regardless of your views on his
argument: notice the craft of it.
So, for your next paper, in 4 pages, respond by crafting an essay in response:
● Summarize his arguments, highlighting the key point you will focus on.
● Take an explicit stance on one key point you agree or disagree with (see below my
prompts)
● Provide at least one quote of support from the articles found in the BCC database as well
as the book. Note: don’t just pull some random sentence from an essay; really try to use
your research to back up your stance or argument.
Prompts:
● One of his key points is that we are being raised to be more consumers than citizens. He
points to Gretta Thornburg as an example of what citizen might look like. And Synder’s
book might also be seen as lessons on what it means to be a citizen. Summarize Krenak’s
argument, do your own research on what it means to be a citizen, and enter into the
conservation with Krenak.
● One of Krenak’s overarching themes through the book is that we are different not just
culturally, but also in the way we think and view our relationships to the world, especially
nature. Summarize his arguments, do some research on the idea of “multiplicities of
knowledge,” and write an argumentative response.
● In the center section of the book, Krenak explores the relationship of the State to
indigenous communities. We here in North America are also contemplating the State’s
relationship to indigenous communities. Right here in Northern California land was given
back to a tribe (Google it). Summarize his arguments, do some research, and write a
response on the responsibilities we might have towards indigenous communities.

The Interpretive Essay: Overview, Process, and Presentation Overview: Based on

The Interpretive Essay: Overview, Process, and Presentation
Overview:
Based on

The Interpretive Essay: Overview, Process, and Presentation
Overview:
Based on our work with factual, interpretive, and evaluative questions, and in light of our discussion of Act One of Arcadia, you will be asked to pose and respond to interpretive questions requiring close careful analysis of related parts to the text.
As a reminder, an interpretive question is characterized by the following:
Must be an honest question that requires returning to the text.
Draws the reader into a deeper understanding of the work.
Claims must be supportable from close consideration of the text’s details.
After discussion, questions might remain unresolved.
Further, an interpretive question should do both of the following:
Compel an investigation of relevant moments in the text.
Lead to a revised consideration of the text as a whole.
The Interpretive question will serve two functions:
Some versions of the question will guide and focus your own process.
Another version of the question will orient the reader towards your essay’s eventual argument.
PROCESS:
This 2.5 – 3 page response paper has no set prompt – it instead is designed to allow your own intellectual curiosity to develop naturally from your active reading / engagement with the text.
Begin by crafting an interpretive question (This may come out of discussion) that you might think suits the format and scope of the paper (2.5-3 pages). Consider why you’re asking this particular question of the particular text – this will help you frame your argument and keep your thinking within the universe of the text itself.
Your paper’s thesis will be a complex, defendable response to your interpretive question, one that requires you to convince your reader of its validity and its applicability to the text as a whole. Since interpretive questions are, by definition, ones that suggest more than reasonable, supportive responses, be sure to consider multiple possible answers to your question before you begin to write the paper; you may find that your eventual thesis combines several of these initial possibilities.
You will likely discover your interpretive question evolving over the course of writing the paper. In its final form, it should tightly fit the actual work of the essay.
PRESENTATION:
Your essay will consist of four parts: Title, Introduction/Thesis, body, and conclusion. A successful paper will integrate all four parts into a unified argument.
Title:Your title is a component of your argument and sets the tone for the rest of the paper. Avoid cleverness and /or cliche. Write your title last. Consider the keywords that make up your argument.
Introduction/Interpretive question: Because your audience consists of your classmates, there is no need to introduce or summarize the text in a broad sense. Instead, immediately take your reader to the crux of your engagement with the text. Highlight what you find to be most compelling about the interpretive question at the center of the paper ( present question as a question)
Body/Textual Analysis: Once you’ve established your interpretive question, the body of the essay (there is no set number of paragraphs) works to develop your argumentative claim using the strongest possible evidence. Do not go outside of the text for your interpretation, reasoning or examples. Instead, locate the best textual evidence in order to ground your response in a thorough, accurate reading of the text. Be judicious so that you can be thorough. Quote directly from the text and tie your interpretation / analysis to these quoted passages.
Conclusion / Part-to-Whole: A brief concluding paragraph should not contain any crucial new information directly related to the argument; rather, it should offer a part-to-whole application. In other words, how does the specific aspect of the paper you’re focusing on (and the argument you’ve arrived at) in turn help you understand the overall meaning/message of the text?

The genre chosen is nonfiction: travel writing, or journalism. Even feature writ

The genre chosen is nonfiction: travel writing, or journalism. Even feature writ

The genre chosen is nonfiction: travel writing, or journalism. Even feature writing, Op-eds.
Keep the language simple!
To assist with this, find 3-5 artifacts within the selected genre and analyze along the lines of the questions below. Depending on the genre, some of the questions below may be more or less relevant. Adapt and interpret as needed for the genre you’ve selected.
Questions to Address as part of your analysis:
Assessing the rhetorical situation of the genre:
In what contexts does the genre appear? How and when is it used? With what other genres does this genre interact?
What topics, issues, and ideas does this genre address? What content does it ignore?
Who uses the genre?
Consider both writers and readers for this question: who writes the texts in this genre? Who reads the texts in this genre? What characteristics must writers in this genre possess? Under what circumstances do readers read the genre?
Why do writers write this genre and why do readers read it? What purposes does the genre fulfill for the people who use it?
Identifying the patterns of the genre:
What content is typically included? What is excluded? How is the content treated? What sort of examples are used? What counts as evidence (personal testimony, facts, etc)?
What rhetorical appeals are used? Specifically, appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos?
How are the texts in the genre structured? What are their parts, and how are they organized?
In what format are texts in this genre presented? What layout or appearance is common? How long is a typical text of this genre?
What kind of voice and style are appropriate and particular to this genre?

Analyzing the meanings of the patterns:
What do participants have to know, believe, or understand to appreciate the genre?
Who is invited into the genre? Who is excluded?
What values, beliefs, goals, and/or assumptions are revealed through the genre?
What content is considered most important? What content (topic, details etc) is ignored?
What actions does the genre help make possible? What actions does the genre make difficult?
What attitude toward readers is implied in the genre? What attitude toward the world is implied in it?
Part II:
Writer’s Memo:
Please turn in a writer’s memo with your essay. The writer’s memo should:
Be 300-350 words
Explain how/why you incorporated (or not) feedback from peers and/or myself and/or a tutor and/or a family member
Briefly articulate 1 thing you think went well. Why do you feel good about this?
If you used AI to help in any part of the assignment, describe it here
What would you like me to keep in mind as I read?
What questions would you like me to respond to, as your reader?
What aspects of the writing would you like me to comment on?
What aspects of the writing would you prefer I don’t comment on?
Identify at least 1 skill you practiced in this assignment. How might you draw on this skill in future classes? In life outside the classroom?

In order to be considered complete your paper must:
Part I should be 1000-1200 words
Part II should be 300-350 words
Clearly identify the genre you are exploring and contain a minimum of 3 samples
Respond to the questions above in narrative form and with an organizational approach that effectively communicates the information
12 pt Times New Roman font
Double-spaced
1-inch margins
Proper MLA heading and citations
Works cited (accounts for the different pieces)

The genre chosen is nonfiction: travel writing, or journalism. Even feature writ

The genre chosen is nonfiction: travel writing, or journalism. Even feature writ

The genre chosen is nonfiction: travel writing, or journalism. Even feature writing, Op-eds.
Keep the language simple!
To assist with this, find 3-5 artifacts within the selected genre and analyze along the lines of the questions below. Depending on the genre, some of the questions below may be more or less relevant. Adapt and interpret as needed for the genre you’ve selected.
Questions to Address as part of your analysis:
Assessing the rhetorical situation of the genre:
In what contexts does the genre appear? How and when is it used? With what other genres does this genre interact?
What topics, issues, and ideas does this genre address? What content does it ignore?
Who uses the genre?
Consider both writers and readers for this question: who writes the texts in this genre? Who reads the texts in this genre? What characteristics must writers in this genre possess? Under what circumstances do readers read the genre?
Why do writers write this genre and why do readers read it? What purposes does the genre fulfill for the people who use it?
Identifying the patterns of the genre:
What content is typically included? What is excluded? How is the content treated? What sort of examples are used? What counts as evidence (personal testimony, facts, etc)?
What rhetorical appeals are used? Specifically, appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos?
How are the texts in the genre structured? What are their parts, and how are they organized?
In what format are texts in this genre presented? What layout or appearance is common? How long is a typical text of this genre?
What kind of voice and style are appropriate and particular to this genre?

Analyzing the meanings of the patterns:
What do participants have to know, believe, or understand to appreciate the genre?
Who is invited into the genre? Who is excluded?
What values, beliefs, goals, and/or assumptions are revealed through the genre?
What content is considered most important? What content (topic, details etc) is ignored?
What actions does the genre help make possible? What actions does the genre make difficult?
What attitude toward readers is implied in the genre? What attitude toward the world is implied in it?
Part II:
Writer’s Memo:
Please turn in a writer’s memo with your essay. The writer’s memo should:
Be 300-350 words
Explain how/why you incorporated (or not) feedback from peers and/or myself and/or a tutor and/or a family member
Briefly articulate 1 thing you think went well. Why do you feel good about this?
If you used AI to help in any part of the assignment, describe it here
What would you like me to keep in mind as I read?
What questions would you like me to respond to, as your reader?
What aspects of the writing would you like me to comment on?
What aspects of the writing would you prefer I don’t comment on?
Identify at least 1 skill you practiced in this assignment. How might you draw on this skill in future classes? In life outside the classroom?

In order to be considered complete your paper must:
Part I should be 1000-1200 words
Part II should be 300-350 words
Clearly identify the genre you are exploring and contain a minimum of 3 samples
Respond to the questions above in narrative form and with an organizational approach that effectively communicates the information
12 pt Times New Roman font
Double-spaced
1-inch margins
Proper MLA heading and citations
Works cited (accounts for the different pieces)

To help you get started, -think of the work’s title. -what general attitudes do

To help you get started,
-think of the work’s title.
-what general attitudes do

To help you get started,
-think of the work’s title.
-what general attitudes do the character’s have towards the setting?
-how are events determined by external factors?
Requirements
The essay:
Must be at a minimum of 400 words in length (1-2 pgs.).
Must have an original title.
Must have an explicit thesis statement and precise topic sentences.
Must use evidence from research, observation, and personal experience to support points.
Clearly and logically articulate your claim/stance.
Use an appropriate level of formality, and use a reasonable tone.
Must have in-text citations as well as a Works Cited page.
Sources must be documented using MLA-style parenthetical references and works cited page. The works cited page should include only those sources that are actually cited in your paper.
Must be typed D.S. 12pt font/Times New Roman
Here is a link to the story this essay should be based off of: https://xpressenglish.com/our-stories/greasy-lake/

II. You should have at least three but no more than four scholarly journal artic

II. You should have at least three but no more than four scholarly journal artic

II. You should have at least three but no more than four scholarly journal articles and or periodicals cited in the text and on the References. Scholarly journal articles are long, comprehensive, and useful in numerous ways, for numerous reasons, in different sections of your paper. They contain so much data and interpretation of data that you ought to be able to find one or two that you can use over and over again throughout the essay and then you can supplement with current magazines and newspaper articles because, depending on the topic, on the problem, you may not find a large amount of published academic material from the last couple years (given what you know about academic research and its incredibly rigorous process).
III. Draft your essay according to the template provided to you below (coming from the textbook Midland College requires in 1301 as our course syllabus states that 1302 is an extension of 1301).
Objective: Write a full five page essay complete with proper APA style, formatting and citation (to include a seventh References page).
Per the course syllabus: Because the state curriculum board mandates that all 1301 courses write a certain amount of words, you are required to submit developed work. In other words, if you want your essay to be evaluated, you must submit a complete essay. Essays that are substantially shorter than the requirement will be considered incomplete and ineligible to earn a grade. If your essay does not meet minimum APA standards with regard to basic formatting, your essay will be considered incomplete and ineligible for evaluation. You will be required to draft a complete essay and resubmit the work in a timely manner if you want it to be graded.
Logic: Essay Template (Synthesis):
I. Introduction: Provide one paragraph of general, brief, contextual information to bring your audience “up to speed,” so to speak, so that they’ll understand your angle and purpose. Maybe they don’t know what a proposal is so you may want to mention why you’re writing. No matter what, your job is to provide background information that will lead seamlessly into your breakdown of the problem and your proposed solution to the problem. End your introduction with an argumentative thesis. Remember that your argumentative thesis is made up of a claim, followed by the word “because,” and then followed by at least one specific reason (my power points cover this material at length). Without a proper thesis, your essay cannot have any effective logos.
II. Problem analysis: This is a brief paragraph (or two, depending on how deep you need to go) that provides only the most relevant and important causes and or effects. I’m sure that no matter what problem you choose to solve, you’ll be overwhelmed with all of the causes and effects. Don’t write about all of them. Choose a couple so that you can focus on creating a firm foundation for your solution. Keep in mind that your solution should be logically connected to what you say the causes and or effects are. They need to be connected. If you say that x problem has y and z effects, your solution needs to offer up ways in which to solve y and z so that x can decrease; the effects will be mitigated, reduced. You cannot and will not solve the whole problem so don’t try to.
III. Plan for solving the problem: A) Walk your audience through the step-by-step plan, the steps needed to solve the problem (be specific), B) Incorporate support (research with citations) as you provide each step; C) Take time to briefly discuss how implementing your plan actually helps people. You may care about this topic but why should your audience care as much as you? Keep in mind that as you write, as you compose your academic argument, do not address your audience. Unlike your previous two essays, you should not be using first and second person (“I” and “you”). Your essay doesn’t need to include pronouns at all. Your voice and tone should be objective and detached, much like the voice and tone, the persona conveyed in the scholarly journal articles you read and are using in the essay. You’re joining an academic conversation so envision how you want those people to “hear” you. Please indulge my metaphor: Imagine that you’ve been invited to a dinner party by your boss. You arrive in the proper attire, ready to network, and impress people. You see your colleagues mingling with upper management. They’re already engaged in an intense conversation. Would you just walk straight up to them and start talking? Hopefully, you’d be able to handle yourself gracefully. The way you sound in your essay goes a long way toward building your ethos so take it seriously.
IV. Costs and benefits of the plan; Please note that yes, there will be costs but the section is about “benefits” mostly because people are usually motivated by promises of gain (pathos). Mention the costs but spend a good deal of time proving that if your audience believes you and is persuaded to be a part of the solution, they will gain in tangible ways. Prove it.
V. Conclusion: Compose one paragraph that summarizes and paraphrases your topic sentences (the main ideas of your body paragraphs). Restate your thesis. Justify the importance, the urgency, of taking action now. Explain the “takeaway” to your audience. You must inspire your audience, one last time, to do something and be a part of the solution.
Rubric: Assessment and Evaluation: Please refer to the general essay rubric in our course materials module. In terms of overall composition and structure, I will be looking for how well you show off your understanding of how to format an academic essay in general (title page, intro, body paragraphs, conclusion, References page) and how well you follow the template that I just gave you. I provided everyone with a clear rubric for the previous two essays. As this is your final exam, it’s meant to be cumulative and all-inclusive in terms of persuasive technique, strategy, and effective research, and coherent, analytical, logical, and therefore persuasive writing. I’m looking at this final essay as what should be your best work. Either I see clear evidence that you’ve progressed and learned what you must learn about writing well and persuasion or not.
As such, your essay will earn an A (90-100) or a C (70-75) or a failing grade. I don’t want to “nit-pick” here. I want to learn from you. I want to know that you’re an expert in your chosen topic. I want to see that you’ve become proficient with APA style, formatting, citation, and, of course, that you can blend emotion and logic to create an, overall, compelling, persuasive research paper. Since I’ve annotated your previous two essays and given you a lot of feedback on how to improve your writing, I won’t do that here. Since this is a final exam based on two essays of preparation, I will not include a lot of comments/annotations in my evaluation. Please ensure that this is exemplary of what you’ve not only learned in 1301 but also in 1302.

Remember a rhetorical analysis, analyzes a writer’s choices, stylistic devices,

Remember a rhetorical analysis, analyzes a writer’s choices, stylistic devices,

Remember a rhetorical analysis, analyzes a writer’s choices, stylistic devices, and organization, while focusing on how the writer was able to convey a central purpose. Your job as a writer is to understand how the choices the writer makes determine how the audience understands the writer’s purpose.
Your essay should be in 3rd person POV, contain a minimum of 850 words, and focus on the writer, John Green’s style and purpose. Please use MLA format. Include a Works Cited page, and use in-text citations.

Set a timer for 20-30 minutes. Sit down and write whatever comes to mind. Don’t

Set a timer for 20-30 minutes. Sit down and write whatever comes to mind. Don’t

Set a timer for 20-30 minutes. Sit down and write whatever comes to mind. Don’t overthink it. Don’t re-read. Just write in a stream of consciousness. You may proofread for spelling errors, but do not edit your work. Submit what you write. That’s all.
Welcome to the Beat Movement. There is no such thing as a bad thought or editing.
Module 12 Readings
– Beat Generation
* https://www.britannica.com/art/Beat-movement
* Jack Kerouac – On the Road
* https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/540750/on-the-road-by-jack-kerouac/9780142437254/excerpt
* Jack Kerouac – The Beat Generation
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jej5d2kYjuQ
* Allen Ginsberg – Homework
* https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/49311/homework-56d22b44cb0bd
* Joyce Johnson – Mother’s Apron
* https://www.poetrysoup.com/poem/mothers_apron_222503#google_vignette
* Diane Di Prima – Buddhism New Year Song
* https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/54974/buddhist-new-year-song