Category: Celebrity

Not every day you’ll see a celebrity have time for themselves, not even have their own privacy. Nowadays, there are always articles or pictures of almost every single celebrity on the news or social media exploiting their personal lives. All over the media, a great amount of attention has turned towards the personal lives of stars that are admired or are usually the center of attention for the whole public. It seems as though the public is eager to hear this kind of drama. However, there should be laws established to protect famous people from being constantly hoarded by the paparazzi and reporters. Quite frankly, the act of intrusion on celebrities is a problem because it’s an invasion of basic human rights. Usually, these problems are caused by inappropriate photos or videos being leaked online that everyone from across the world could see. Another cause would be the paparazzi being involved at all times and following the celebrity everywhere they go. The last cause of the whole situation would also be the media getting involved.

Many people do believe celebrities deserve their privacy as well, but then there are other people who question why they don’t need it because they’re famous. The only reason why people on the negative side of things ask, “why should a celebrity have their own privacy” is because sometimes a celebrity shares some information accidentally or intentionally. “Even without the extremity of the hacking of intimate photos, celebrities are more and more involved in a bizarre balancing act when it comes to exposing their lives to the public” (Teeman, Par. 7). This would mean people would consider them hypocrites if they were to put themselves in danger and jeopardizing their career. Regardless of any sort, if a celebrity were to give away any information to the public, nobody has the right to invade or intrude on their personal lives even if it’s been leaked. Celebrities are regular citizens too, they have every right to share what they want to share as long as it doesn’t end up in the wrong hands. As for the media, they really shouldn’t put themselves at risk all for an excellent cost to spy on a celebrity. Everyone around the world should have at least the right to live their lives in the way they want and people should respect that decision, but to this day people are still trying to find a way to invade someone else’s privacy in many other ways including a celebrity.

In today’s society, people with acclaim to fame, or public status are known as celebrities. being in the limelight, there has always been a social debate as to whether celebrities deserve their “solitude and privacy” in life. This may mean not being under the limelight for no reason, avoiding paparazzi, or just living in secrecy, I personally interpret the question’s meaning as simple as black or white: outside the limelight, do celebrities deserve the same privacy normal people have the privilege of having in life? In this question, I am going to convey my concept and idea, but still, show how impartial I can be whilst showing my support I am going to explore this topic on both sides, and cover an array of issues on both sides, such as over-extensive journalism by paparazzi, celebrities using their publicity (good or bad) to shape societies public image on beauty, and how some celebrities use the exclusive privacy and their status to behave mischievously in society without the watchful eye of the public domain.

Initially, in the past celebrities were usually considered “figures of beauty” and that has not changed at all in the past few years with famous figures being an array of people such as models, and actors, and when you have a heavy influence on society, you are able to dictate the idea of today’s social beauty standards. Whether that’s chiseled jawlines or a curvy hourglass figure, Celebrities do shape the idea of beauty. But this carries its negatives as I am about to explain: Recently celebrities such as Kylie Jenner and Khloe Kardashian have been under fire for their use of cosmetic surgery for their body and face, and the way they edit their photos online, which can be misleading and can distort the image of beauty, With this, we never get to see these celebrities in public and it leaves a lot of people feeling insecure/not good enough, for following beauty standards being set by people who cannot meet them themselves. When leaked pictures of the two celebrities occurred, with them not wearing any makeup or having any cosmetic work done at all, they came under fire for “hurting the idea of natural beauty.” According to a study done by Park Nicollet Melrose Center in 2014, “Approximately 80% of u.s women don’t like how they look [1] and in the same study, the statistics in adolescent children show that “53% of 13-year-old American girls are unhappy with their body, and this number does grow to 78% by the age of 17”. This is a big indicator that celebrities and public figures are distorting the eye of beauty, and a Tory MP has proposed a bill to label pictures as “edited” to help combat self-image issues.

On the contrary, people may argue that society and extensive journalism can take their toll on celebrities and point a negative light on them in society, and public figures such as the late Princess Diana have had devastating results of this exact problem which affects celebrities’ privacy and livelihood. In an article by the BBC Called: The princess and the press, it details the ongoing battles the late princess had with the media. She actively and publicly complained about the media’s intrusion. Saying that “photographers and journalists made life impossible for her” [3] and she was seen “driven to tears as she was pursued by paparazzi [4] Although, on the evening of Diana’s fateful car crash, 30 photographers were outside her hotel in Paris, and they went out the back and was spotted and chased whilst Diana met her unfortunate demise. This extensive press coverage is evidence that some celebrities DO need privacy, as some celebrities cannot handle the pressure the media puts on their lives, which in turn makes it harder for them to live in private.

However, there are celebrities who can capitalize off of the attention and breaches of privacy they get, meaning that sometimes they use their private time for a scandal and people can dispute that some celebrities “love” scandals and free publicity to promote their business as there is no type of publicity like free publicity. The best example of this is the queen of scandals herself, Kim Kardashian, who had her sex tape leaked, and used it to propel her to fame. She received a £5m payout for the tape, and the publicity from her tape helped her to start her career in reality tv shows, creating the long-running “keeping up with the Kardashians” and building her own dynasty from there. Another good example is when the paparazzi/journalists followed the singer sia, they managed to take indecent photos of her naked, which they were trying to sell to newspapers and magazines. Eventually, sia caught wind of this and decided to leak her naked pictures to the public, which surprised a lot of people but gave her a lot of publicity, she went back on the apple music top 200 shortly after and she teased new music, which she released eventually.

On the other hand, there are the… occasional celebrities who abuse their position in society and make themselves think they are above the rules, and just because it’s out of public sight, it’s out of their mind. This is evident in a story uncovered by The Independent, who had shown that movie star James Franco, had been texting an underage schoolgirl, asking her to come to his hotel, and flirting with the underaged girl in private, only for her to come out and expose him for his behavior. Footballer Dele Alli was also under fire for his private video in which he was racist towards a Chinese man videoing him, saying ”he had the coronavirus disease” This led him to apologize and he went under repercussions for his behavior not only from his club but by the football governing body, which led to a ban and a £50,000 fine. These two examples support the idea that some celebrities feel as if they are above the law and society in private, and they don’t deserve a private platform if behavior like that is what celebrities condone and tolerate when they are not being watched.

In conclusion, my essay has gone over both sides of the coin in the argument, explaining why it would be important for celebrities to have and attain their own solitude and privacy, and why some people would be against it. Throughout my writing I’ve gone over the issues that can occur in giving celebrities privacy, such as celebrities acting immoral and above the law and above societies standards, the way celebrities misuse their platform to promote a different type of self-hate by posting altered and edited images of themselves, and why it is important to also show the private side of celebrities to combat the problem, the issue of overzealous journalism and its effects physically and mentally on celebrities and how celebrities can use private platforms and their own private photos to promote their careers. All in all in my opinion I believe that having a public platform in society does take away certain private “freedoms” but they do deserve basic privacy just like us normal human beings.

Celebrities and their virtues

What is virtue?

If anyone is asked to define the word virtue, they would give a wide range of meanings spanning from their understanding of the word to the vocabulary they have in their arsenal. However, whichever meaning they provide to the word all points down to the same thing; ‘Being good’. So virtue can be defined as the good behavior of a person as considered by society or the moral excellence of that individual.

Celebrities are usually looked up to as heroes or role models and even idols by most, so sometimes their virtues are called into question. Celebrities are humans, so they too are not perfect, they party and get drunk, get in car races and even sometimes get violent with extreme fans but they also have amazing virtues.

These virtues include certain character strengths such as sound judgment, a sense of responsibility, personal courage, self-mastery, prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance.

These virtues are not easily seen by the public, but they become obvious when they indulge in some more public activities or events that showcase good deeds.

Examples of virtuous celebrities

1. Paul McCartney:

The English singer-songwriter Paul McCartney, and Hollywood actors Woody Harrelson and Joaquin Phoenix co-signed an impassioned letter written by a 12-year-old California eco-activist named Genesis Butler, challenging the pope to go vegan for lent in other to fight climate change. If he agreed, the campaign would offer $1 million US to a charity of the Pope’s choice. In hopes that the Pope’s participation might also inspire Catholics to reconsider their eating habits. This was a virtuous act as meat production is one of the leading causes of climate change, deforestation, and animal extinction. Research shows that by sticking to a vegan diet humans could reduce carbon emissions by half and water usage by 19 percent.

2. Beyoncé Knowles (Beyoncé):

Another example of a celebrity who portrays good virtue is the Grammy award-winning superstar, Beyoncé Knowles (Beyoncé). Beyoncé has also been known to fight climate change by being pro-plant and promoting veganism. Last year the singer went on social media saying that she had decided to follow a strict vegan diet to prepare for her headlining gig at the Coachella music festival. This prompted millions of her fans who followed her on Instagram to take veganism seriously.

She and her husband Jay-Z have set up a website called The Green print Project. The Green print Project is a website that promotes sustainable eating through veganism. Last week, Beyoncé announced to her 120 million-plus Instagram followers that by clicking on the site, they could win lifetime tickets to her and Jay-Z’s concerts. This shows good virtue by the singer.

3. Pharell Williams:

Another Celebrity who displays good virtue is singer-songwriter Pharell Williams, who is the co-founder of Bionic Yarn. Although he is more popular for his songs ‘Happy’ and ‘Freedom’. Bionic Yarn is a company that produces high-quality fabric from recovered and recycled plastic. In other words, he reduces, he reduces and he recycles. So far, Bionic Yarn has teamed up with some of the biggest names in the fashion business, including Adidas, Timberland, Top shop, and GAP, to create upcycled clothing collections (made entirely of Bionic Yarn). The company also recently collaborated with G-Star Raw and Parley for the Oceans to transform recovered plastic from shorelines into an entire denim collection. So Pharell isn’t only jumping around making everyone happy, he is also doing his part to make the planet a better place for everyone.

4. Hugh Jackman:

The X-men superstar Hugh Jackman. Hugh Jackman is the founder of ‘The Laughing Man coffee shop in New York. He was inspired by a meeting with an Ethiopian coffee farmer named Dukale back in 1999. The Laughing Man coffee shop helps farmers in developing countries sell their products in the U.S., which would have been very difficult for them to do without incurring high costs. The Laughing Man Coffee brand was later purchased by Keurig, which now sells Laughing Man Coffee K-Cup varieties.

The proceeds made from the sales of Laughing Man Coffee are directly invested back in the Laughing Man Foundation; the foundation supports educational programs, community development, and social entrepreneurs around the world, especially in developing countries. So Hugh Jack Man doesn’t just help people as the wolverine, he is also helping farmers around the world. A good virtue indeed.

5. Matt Damon:

Another example of good virtues portrayed in celebrities is the community development initiative carried out by the ‘Bourne Legacy’ American actor Matt Damon using Water.org. So many of us know about water.org but what many of us do not know is that Matt Damon is a co-founder. Warer.org is more than just a charity that provides safe water and sanitation for communities in need, They also have a Water Credit initiative, which provides small loans so more people can gain access to clean water. Their New Ventures Fund also provides funding to innovative projects helping to solve the world’s growing water crisis, especially in developing countries.

6. Leonardo DiCaprio:

The Titanic American actor Leonardo DiCaprio. Leonardo DiCaprio is the founder of the Restorative Island, ‘Black adore Caye’. Black adore Caye is a ground-breaking, sustainable resort on a private island off the coast of Belize. As a passionate environmentalist, Leo going beyond the current concept of an ‘eco-resort,’ this innovative getaway will focus more on restoring the island’s natural resources as well as raising awareness around environmental issues and eco-living. According to reports, Black adore Caye features homes built with sustainable and local materials and also integrate renewable energy, electric vehicles, and innovative water and waste treatment systems. Resorts like this that focus on building the environment are rare. So when Leo is not giving his life away to save a damsel in distress, he is helping to save the environment and make the world a better place.

Now, most people are used to thinking badly about celebrities majorly because people don’t know them. Celebrities are amazing people who portray everyday human emotions and virtues. It will be good if we learn from them and apply these virtues in our daily lives, in how we treat others, our families, and the people around us.

Teenage drug and alcohol use in America is on the rise. This use of drugs and alcohol is dangerous and needs to be put to an end. But what factors influence teenagers to start using? Is it family issues? Peer Pressure? Or is it the constant parade of celebrity “role models” going in and out of rehab or the enormous amount of drug and alcohol references found on television and in music lyrics? Many celebrities, like musical artists, actors and actresses, and sports stars, are seen as role models, but the celebrity abuse of drugs and alcohol, appalling behavior while under the influence, continuous referencing to using in music lyrics and on television shows, and frequent trips to rehab influences teenagers to also participate in the act.

According to the National Survey Results of Drug Use performed by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, there has been a significant increase in drug and alcohol use among American Teenagers. The Monitoring the Future Survey studied 8th, 10th, and 12th graders over a period of time, which gives specific statistics to show the increase in drug and alcohol use. In 1991, 6% of 8th graders were frequent users of marijuana, and which number increased to 18% in 1996. 10th grade had an enormous increase from 15% in 1992 to 35% in 1997. The 12th graders also experienced an increase from 22% in 1992 to 39% in 1997. Daily users of marijuana underwent an increase as well. From 1992 to 1996, daily users of marijuana in the 8th grade increased from 0.2% to 1.1%. There was an increase in daily users in 10th and 12th graders as well. 10th grade experienced an increase from 0.8% in 1992 to 3.7% in 1996. 12th graders increased from 1.9% in 1992 to 5.8% in 1996 (Johnston, O’Malley, and Bachman n.p.).

There was not just an increase in marijuana use, but also an increase in other illicit drugs, such as ecstasy, cocaine, LSD, and heroin, and alcohol consumption. The National Survey Results of Drug Use shows that there was an increase in ecstasy use from 3% in 2005 to 4.3% in 2010 among 12th grades, and a rise from 2.3% in 2004 to 4.6% in 2010 among 10th graders (Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, and Schulenberg n.p.). There was an increase in teenage drinking from 1991 to 1998 from 70% to 75% (Johnston, O’Malley, and Bachman n.p.). Alcohol is a big deal because it is used more than marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and other pills. With the increasing number of teenage drinking, there is an increase in the dangerous consequences.

According to Nina Riccio, drinking is destructive to teens and it is usually one factor in the three leading causes of death in young adults: accidents, suicide, and homicide. 20% of car accident deaths ages 15 to 20 were killed in drunk driving, 37% of 8th-grade girls who drink heavily have attempted suicide, 50% of teenagers that drink heavily have been in a physical fight and 16% have carried a weapon (59).

The factors of the increase in drug and alcohol use have been debated heavily, some say it’s family issues or peer pressure, but it is very possible that the influence comes from society, the media, and celebrity influences. Today’s headlines concerning celebrities usually deal with their most recent drug or alcohol abuse issue, rather than discussing the celebrities that do good and charitable work. The media focuses on the negative aspects and flaws of celebrities; they want to show the celebrity at their worst rather than their best. There has been a colossal amount of celebrities getting into legal trouble because of their behavior on drugs or under the influence of alcohol.

The most recent display of the media being fascinated with the downfall of a celebrity is the Charlie Sheen story. On January 27, Charlie Sheen was rushed to the hospital with severe abdominal pains. According to Hollie McKay of Fox News, Charlie Sheen had a “briefcase full of cocaine” at his house and he used large amounts over a 36-hour period of time. Along with the “briefcase full of cocaine,” Sheen partied with two porn stars and other various women (n.p.).

Sheen’s incident led to an out-of-control downward spiral, he was removed from the popular show “Two and a Half Men” and has been seen in the media nearly every day since the incident.

The media’s concentration on Sheen’s actions could be the reason why teenagers believe it is okay to do illegal drugs. If a famous actor like Charlie Sheen can do it, why can’t teenagers? If the media would focus more on the celebrities doing good and bettering their community teenagers may have better role models, but since all attention goes towards the negative how are teenagers supposed to know who is a good role model?

Although Charlie Sheen did not overdose there has been a large number of celebrities’ death caused by drug overdoses or alcohol-related issues. The list of celebrity drug-induced deaths includes John Belushi from Saturday Night Live, Hillel Slovak, the guitarist for the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Marilyn Monroe, Billie Holiday, the famous jazz singer, Ken Caminiti, a baseball star, Anna Nichole Smith, Chris Farley, another Saturday Night Live star, Elvis Presley, Len Bias, the basketball star, Jimi Hendrix, Judy Garland, Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz, and John Bonham, the drummer in the band Led Zeppelin, and the most recent Heath Leger (Top 20 Drug-Induced Celebrity Deaths n.p.). Many of these celebrities’ were looked up to during their time and their deaths show the horrible side effects of drug addiction. In 2007, there were 27,658 reported cases of drug overdose deaths, mostly caused by opioids, cocaine, and heroin (Kluger 6). Celebrity addicts are on the brink of overdosing and ending their own lives too soon. The list of known celebrity addicts and those who have entered rehab for drug or alcohol abuse contains over 170 celebrities (Famous Celebrity Addicts n.p.). The list includes actors, actresses, artists, models, and sports stars. Over 40 celebrities have entered rehab within the last year for either substance abuse or alcohol abuse; these celebrities range from long-time users, like Charlie Sheen, to in and out-of-rehab stars, like Lindsey Lohan, to first-time teen stars, like Demi Lovato. With teenagers’ “role models” being in and out of rehab so frequently, it is no wonder why teenagers believe their actions are acceptable and it is okay to also participate in the act.

Along with the media focusing on celebrity drug and alcohol abuse and the increased number of celebrity addicts and drug-induced deaths, recent studies show that there has been a significant increase in drug and alcohol references in music lyrics and in television shows. Rap and hip-hop is not the only musical genre to being using these references, they can be seen in rock and country, as well. Musical artists, Lil Wayne, Drake, and Wiz Khalifa, are by far the best examples of drug and alcohol references in their lyrics. Musical artists have the most influence over teenagers because music is heard everywhere. Teenagers may think the lyrics in the song are acceptable since the song is played on public radio and accepted by society; however, the actions portrayed in the song are not acceptable to teenagers.

In a study by Denise Herd from the University of Public Health at the University of California, it was concluded that from 1979 to 1984 only 8% of songs contained references to alcohol. From 1985 to 1989 it increased to 14%, from 1990 to 1993 it further increased to 34%, and from 1994 to 1997 it went to 44% of songs containing alcohol references (1263). Nearly half of the songs in 1997 contained a reference to alcohol consumption, and that was 14 years ago. It has increased even more since then; you can see this increase by simply looking at the lyrics of some of today’s popular songs. This can be seen in “On My Level” by Wiz Khalifa:

It’s the champagne pourin’ / Big joint rollin’ / Bombay sippin’ / No blunt smoking . . . I take ‘em out pourin’ shots of liquor / Drinkin’ out the bottle smiling in all my pictures. . . See after drinking champagne all night / Never worry bout a damn thing y’all might / Homie I’m on my level. . . Cocaine mushrooms ecstasy GHB Marijuana. . . I got tequila Ciroc

It can also be seen in “Yeah 3x” by Chris Brown, “You like to drink, so do we / Get more bottles, bring ’em to me / Hold your glasses up, people everywhere”. And it is even more evident in “Shots” by LMFAO:

All drinks are free / We like Ciroc / We love patron / we came to party rock /Everybody it’s on / Let’s go / Shots (x16) . . . If you ain’t getting drunk get the f— out the club / If you ain’t takin shots get the f— out the club / If you ain’t come to party get the f— out the club / Now where my alcoholics let me see ya hands up / what you drink on? /Jaegerbombs / lemon drops / … Jello Shots / Kamikaze . . . Get me some Gin . . . Patron on the rocks and I’m ready for some shots. . . If you feeling drunk put ya hands in the air

With lyrics like these, it is no wonder that teenagers think the consumption of alcoholic beverages is acceptable. Lyrics like these are not only seen in rap and hip hop but also country and rock, as in songs like “Alcohol” by Brad Paisley, “Pretty Good At Drinkin’ Beer’ by Billy Currington, and “I Love This Bar” by Toby Keith.

Along with alcohol references, drug references are seen in numerous music lyrics in almost every genre. In another study performed by Denise Herd, it can be seen that there has been an increase in drug references. From 1979 to 1984 only 11% of songs contained drug references, from 1985 to 1989 it increased slightly to 19%, from 1990 to 1993 it had a drastic increase to 45%, and from 1994 to 1997 it spiked to 69% (171). Well over half of the songs studied contained drug references in the lyrics. With almost 7/10 of songs containing drug references, it can easily be assumed that this had some impact on the increase in drug use. That was about 14 years ago, the drug referencing in songs has increased since then.

An example of drug references today can be seen in the song “Because I Got High” by Afroman, “I was gonna go to class before I got high / I coulda cheated and I coulda passed but I got high / I am taking it next semester and I know why / cause I got high”. But it is not only seen in hip hop but also in classic rock songs, like “Cocaine” by Jackson Browne, which includes lyrics like “Now I’m losing touch with reality and I’m almost out of blow / It’s such a fine line– I hate to see it go / Cocaine, runnin’ all ’round my brain”.

Music is by far the most significant influence on American teenagers and with so many songs referencing alcohol and drugs it must be hard to ignore it. Teenagers look up to musical artists and if they are drinking and partying and doing drugs it must be the “cool” thing to do. Wiz Khalifa has his own “gang” called Taylor Gang, which is a lifestyle that consists of getting high off marijuana, drunk off alcohol, and getting Money. Teenagers wish to represent the TaylorGang lifestyle, because they are overpoweringly influenced by the music, and then participate in underage drinking and smoking marijuana. Teenagers believe this is acceptable because it is played on public radios and played as music videos on television. Parents have little or no control over what their teenagers listen to on the radio, which causes a dilemma in stopping inappropriate music lyrics.

Teenage alcohol and drug use are also influenced by celebrities in television shows, such as the Real World and Jersey Shore. In an episode that aired on January 17, 2011, in season 3 of Jersey Shore, Snooki (Nicole Polizzi), was arrested for being belligerently drunk on the beach.

While she was being escorted off the beach by the police, she fought back and resisted arrest. This is just one of many examples of the Jersey Shore cast’s appalling behavior while under the influence of alcohol. Every episode consists of drunken outrages and drunken hookups.

Jersey shore glorifies drunken behavior and partying. The large majority of its viewers are teenagers, and the teenagers try to impersonate the cast of Jersey Shore by mimicking their style, speech, and actions. Teenagers believe that their actions are more than acceptable and “cool”.

It can be determined by recent surveys and studies that celebrities have a large impact on American teenagers. Young teens see these celebrities as role models and believe that their actions are always appropriate. Teens are heavily influenced by music and television, so the constant reference to drugs and alcohol has led to the recent increase in teen drug and alcohol use. Celebrities should undergo stricter punishments when caught using illegal drugs, to show young teens that there are severe consequences. However, parents cannot control music or television, but parents can talk to their children about drug and alcohol use and the long-term effects it has on them.

Introduction:

Transcendentalism, a philosophical movement rooted in the belief in the inherent goodness of both humanity and nature, emerged in the 19th century. While the transcendentalist movement is historically associated with figures such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, its principles and ideals continue to resonate in modern times. This critical essay aims to explore the concept of modern-day transcendentalist celebrities, examining the ways in which they embody the principles of transcendentalism and the potential impact they have on society.

Body:

Embracing Individualism:

Transcendentalist celebrities of today often exhibit a strong sense of individualism, prioritizing personal freedom, self-expression, and authenticity. They reject societal expectations and norms, choosing to follow their own path and pursue their passions. By doing so, they encourage others to embrace their uniqueness and challenge the status quo, fostering a culture of self-discovery and personal growth.

Connection with Nature:

Transcendentalism emphasizes the importance of connecting with nature as a means of achieving spiritual and emotional enlightenment. Modern-day transcendentalist celebrities often advocate for environmental sustainability, conservation, and the preservation of natural resources. Their work highlights the interconnectedness of humanity and the environment, promoting a sense of responsibility and stewardship towards the natural world.

Pursuit of Social Justice:

Transcendentalist celebrities frequently engage in social activism and advocate for equality, justice, and human rights. They use their platforms to raise awareness about societal issues, challenge systemic injustices, and promote positive change. By aligning their values with transcendentalist ideals, they inspire their followers to question societal norms and work towards a more equitable and inclusive society.

Cultivating Inner Wisdom and Intuition:

Transcendentalism encourages individuals to trust their own inner wisdom and intuition, rather than relying solely on external authority. Modern-day transcendentalist celebrities often emphasize the importance of self-reflection, mindfulness, and introspection. They encourage their audience to explore their inner selves, develop a deeper understanding of their values, and make decisions based on their authentic beliefs and aspirations.

Impact on Society:

The influence of modern-day transcendentalist celebrities extends beyond their individual personas. Through their art, activism, and public personas, they shape cultural narratives and challenge societal norms. They inspire others to question the status quo, reexamine their values, and strive for personal and societal transformation. Their impact can be seen in movements advocating for social change, environmental consciousness, and individual empowerment.

Conclusion:

Modern-day transcendentalist celebrities embody the principles of transcendentalism by embracing individualism, connecting with nature, pursuing social justice, and cultivating inner wisdom. Through their influence, they inspire others to question societal norms, advocate for positive change, and strive for personal growth. While it is essential to critically examine the influence of celebrities, the alignment of their values with transcendentalist ideals presents an opportunity for societal transformation. By following the example of these modern-day transcendentalists, individuals can embrace their own individuality, deepen their connection with nature, and contribute to a more just and harmonious world.

Roseanne Barr had made her first appearance on ‘The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson’, when most females were rarely on his show. When Roseanne made the appearance on the show, she immediately blew up overnight. She had a career that soon led her to be the star on her own show called ‘Roseanne’ and her three ex-husbands had made an appearance on the show, Ben Thomas, Tom Arnold and, Bill Pentland. Roseanne has three TV shows that she is stared in expect ‘The Conners’ when she made an appearance in a couple of episodes then had a death scene because of what she had said and had apologized for.

Roseanne Barr is an amazing, talented, funny, outgoing and smart person. She is a very influential comedian she had done her best work as a mother, sister, and wife on all her TV shows especially ‘Roseanne’s Nuts’ that showed her true self and not having to read scripts, she got to live her own life how she wanted in front of cameras, her four children and her husband. Roseanne once said: “The thing women have yet to learn is nobody gives you power. You just take it”. This quote has inspired a lot of people over the years that Roseanne has been big. Roseanne has had her ups and downs throughout her life and especially on her shows. Her TV family and her real family has been there for her for a long time no matter what. On ‘The Conners’ Dan Conner (John Goodman) was her husband and when she ‘died’ he took it very hard. To some people, you could see it was more than ‘just acting’ as you would say. She had impacted so many people’s lives. The success of Roseanne had been started by giving comedians their own sitcoms like for instance, Tim Allen’s show ‘Home Improvement’ and Ray Romano from ‘Everybody Loves Raymond’. The producers of Roseanne’s show would not allow her to have her own name as the title of her show so they named it ‘Life and Stuff’. So many people hate Roseanne Barr just because of what she’s done in the past, but they choose not to see what she’s done that’s been good. She has been such an inspiring, caring, loving and amazing person to not only her family, but her TV family too. She has made a lot of impressions to other people to be accepting and respectful to others. Now if that isn’t a moral ethical lesson from not only a mom, but also a TV mom showing that everyone is the same, then I don’t know what is.

Roseanne Barr is a very influential person. She always has been and she has taken over sitcoms in so many people opinions. In one episode of ‘Roseanne’, DJ (her son on the show) did not want to kiss a girl because she was a different race and Roseanne said: “Hey. Black people are just like us, they are every bit as good as us”. And had taught DJ a valuable lesson on how everyone is just as good and just the same as us. Roseanne teaches valuable lessons to not only kids, but also to adults. She is a very influential person.

How Celebrities Influence the Dynamic of Relationships in Society through Functionalist Perspective.

The emergence of such impressions categorizes modern human society as celebrity culture. Celebrity culture has risen under the influence of social changes, for instance, the decline in organized religion, the mediatization of society, a decline of the authority of traditional orientation groups, and commercialization. In simpler, definition celebrity culture is the custom that focuses on famous individuals for some reason. Celebrity culture might also be harmful since it disturbs society from real extreme problems happening universally, making people want people to be celebrated and get noticed, which can ruin friendships. Relationship dynamics refers to the manners that occur between people in how they relate, interact, and communicate. Most influential celebrities are now associated with popular culture, comprising singers and movie stars. These influential people edict ideas or preferences and styles. They are arguments that arise that celebrity culture can change the world. The functionalist viewpoint perceives society as a compound system whose parts promote harmony and constancy. This paper explores how celebrities impact the dynamic of affiliation in culture through a functionalist view.

Functionalism theory views society as a hybrid but an orderly and steady system with consistent structures and functions or social patterns that operate to meet individuals’ needs in society. Celebrities have helped improve solidarity and stability; for example, if an influential person engages in certain social activities, people are brought together and interact well. Therefore celebrity industry is assisting in promoting stability and solidarity.

According to the perspective of sociology, each aspect of society is interdependent and contributes to society’s functioning and stability. Here is an example of a functionalist perspective, where the government tends to provide education for the children, which pays taxes on which the state depends to keep itself running. Therefore, we will be looking for the functionality perspective the prominent person engages in to maintain their name outside where the celebrity industry will profit in getting endorsements.

Prominent persons educate society on the aid the government should support them. Therefore, it promotes interaction with the community by engaging them in discussing the activities they have been taught. The government bodies notify them and use them as icons to spread the news. In addition, interaction is enhanced, and exchange is ensured, maintaining stability and solidarity. Therefore, this shows that celebrities influence society’s relationships through a functionalist perspective.

They educate society on cultural norms through cultural functionalism, where they get involved in cultural activities. Therefore people interact and try not to abandon their cultural practices, thus enhancing the dynamic relationship, especially culture.

Structural functionalism, helps people get to know the lives of celebrities. Therefore they give society something to talk about. The organization receives to manifest the intended consequences of celebrity gossip. This interaction is enhanced, thus promoting dynamic relationships in the community.

Generally, celebrity behaviors affect society in none way or another. The behaviors may be positive or negative, which will influence the dynamic relationships in society. Although influential people might negatively impact a community, they positively influence society. Celebrities promote ethical values and make responsible decisions that favorably affect people. Famous people can set great examples of appropriate behaviors and attitudes. For instance, several of them support charitable campaigns, participate in discussions regarding social problems, raise money for people who suffer from a deficiency, Contribute to health organizations and promote philanthropism.

Furthermore, celebrities who live decent lives serve as positive role models where individuals imitate their characters. Influential people support social honesty and make substantial contributions when disasters likely come. In some cases, the celebrity industry can help, like if children are not obsessed with mistakes and vague ideas. These influential individuals in the industry can help.

Society felt that hair cut in ladies maybe it is unattractive. These influential people help to improve self-esteem in low-confidence individuals. That can be by imitating haircuts or the fashion style of a prominent person to enhance confidence and assertiveness—this impacts society in a positive way. In addition, influential individuals can positively influence society in the environment. For instance, they resolve global problems and enhance dynamic relationships among people in the community.

Prominent people also share their experiences with people they have met. They explain how they handled the situations, which adds some knowledge to society. Society benefits positively from these ideas because they understand how they can handle different situations, especially while interacting with people, to maintain stability and solidarity.

Celebrities cultivate outgoing personalities, which impact society positively. For instance, people improve communication skills as they meet with other fans and discuss news and events linked with their admiration. The organization also gets informed about the international communities on environmental issues advocating a green lifestyle. That helps in encouraging society to work hard.

Celebrities live a specific lavish style that society members end up assuming. Despite their income varying, a person might work more innovative in a bid to live a better life, hence imitating the influential person. That clearly shows that celebrity culture positively impacts society from a functionality perspective.

The Celebrity industry has helped celebrities maintain their name outside. For example, when they get involved in activities like donations, society will highly appreciate them. During these activities, the organization gets to interact with each other; therefore, the community copies the prominent persons, hence solidarity and stability.

Celebrities also attract attention to social issues like poverty, education, and cultural awareness, promoting solidarity and stability in society. Also, different stars share their experiences in dating and the challenges they face. That helps the organization, especially teenagers, to deal with relationship issues. By doing this, an interaction emerges between society and celebrities. Therefore this promotes stability and solidarity.

Celebrities also help to grow talents. For example, if a prominent person gets notified of a talented person but the person is needy, they assist the person. That can be showcasing the person on social media where people support the person. That is a way of maintaining solidarity and stability in society; People interact together during these events. That is another way of maintaining their reputation in the community and getting notified faster.

According to the functionalist perspective of sociology, each aspect of society is codependent. It also donates to society’s firmness and operationality as a whole. For example, according to celebrity culture, influential people advertise products for companies. In return, they are compensated very well. Advertisements contribute to the cultivation of celebrity culture where society is informed about sources of income.

Many celebrities are open and clear about their hardships and mental health. As a result, they influence society positively because they help reduce stigma and raise awareness. Some of them release songs that consequently inspire people nationwide. That helps enlighten young teens, for example, against drug abuse.

Celebrities have a positive impact on youth as they act as role models. Their events encourage children to strive hard and succeed in life. But in another case, they provide unhealthy examples that affect teenagers’ mental health. That shows that celebrities influence society both negatively and positively.

In addition, celebrity advocacy can cause the adoption of specific health prevention measures—for example, a celebrity named Angelina Jolie publicly announced her double mastectomy. Therefore stars serve as agents of positive social change, eradicating the stigma associated with disorders and vital information about preventative behaviors. Many celebrities have used prominent social standing to offer medical advice and endorse health products.

On the other hand, members of society that are passionate about entertainment and personalities are genuinely affected by these diligences. Popularity has an essential impact on almost every aspect of the lives of regular people, including interests, behaviors, trends, opinions, and fashion. However, teenagers and children are the most affected. That shows that celebrity behaviors affect society negatively.

Society is powerfully affected by celebrities’ misbehaviors. Many people believe that if they mimic the lifestyle of prominent people, they think it will help them achieve success and clout. In some cases, celebrities are caught up in misconduct, for example, drug abuse. However, society is involved in such transgressions as well. Media presents such highlights that involve influential people to encourage individuals to act the same way. These activities negatively affect society, most likely children and teenagers.

In conclusion, prominent people significantly affect the lives of regular people. Due to the fast development of new trends in technologies, mass media has become a potent tool for promoting different ideas and concepts. Prominent people are one of the major topics in the universe, and various agencies exploit celebrity culture to make a profit.

Celebrities nowadays are trendy because if a company has to launch a product, they look for prominent people. Hence that shows that celebrity people can be considered good people in one way or other despite having adverse effects on culture, The celebrity industry might have positive effects on the custom of modern societies as well. Influential people promote stable and worthy ideas like the importance of moral values, ethical norms, family, and education, among others. Despite that, the drawbacks of celebrity culture outweigh its advantages.

We have discussed several ways in which prominent persons engage themselves in society. Therefore, in conclusion, we agree that celebrities influence dynamic relationships through a functionalist perspective.

Hence, it is necessary to focus more on the positive aspects and try to reduce the intensity of the unfavorable effects of celebrities on the culture of modern society.

Jamie Oliver has had a progressive career as a celebrity chef, which has allowed him to remain diverse and dynamic in each role he has encountered. This essay will critically discuss how Oliver has been able to be a lifestyle expert, celebrity endorser and cultural intermediary throughout his career, and assess the elements that has facilitated in the success in each role, as it adds further to the critical discussion of each role. The understanding the history of Oliver’s life as well as the history of cooking will aid in developing a critical discourse into the importance it plays in the roles of Jamie Oliver in his career. In order to understand this the definition of celebrity used will be “anyone who is familiar enough to the people a brand wishes to communicate with to add value to that communication by association with their image and reputation” (Pringle, 2004, p.14).

Jamie Oliver is a well know British celebrity chef. In 1999, the BBC aired his first show, The Naked chef, where the British audience grew fond of him and his distinctive viewpoint on culinary practice (Hollows, 2010). Oliver’s Parents owned a pub-restaurant in Essex, where he was introduced to the culinary industry, that before his teen years he knew the steps of basic food preparation and realized that cooking was his talent (Schreiber, 2019). Oliver then continued learning the art of culinary by furthering his understanding in both Westminster Catering College in London, in addition to gaining extra training in France (Schreiber, 2019). Throughout Oliver’s career, he has gained TV credits which has demonstrated his love for food as well as his evolution in understanding the importance of promoting healthy food and a sustainable cuisine (Schreiber, 2019).

The History of Cooking

When we think about gender, we automatically know the roles that both females and males have been subjected to, especially when it comes to the role cooking. In the 19th century, the concept of advice manuals became increasingly popular. Women were thought to be keepers of good taste and morality, especially as Langland (1995) argued that status had become progressively more entwined with taste and manners, hence why many women searched for advice from these Victorian advice manuals (Lewis, 2014, p.137). This was a result of men and women’s defined roles in the 19th century. The men would commute to work, whether it be in a factory, shop or office. Whereas, the women stayed at home to manage the domestic duties (Marsh, 2016). The two genders were thought of as ‘separate spheres’, because it the two genders were only together at breakfast and dinner (Hughes, 2014). However, In the 20th century, both genders began to seek and receive change in their roles. The advice culture began to shift its concentration from women being bearers of good taste, to introducing them to the concept of consumption for fun and spend on themselves rather than it being for just their family and home (Catterall, 2002, p.61). Post-war magazines began to advice men in the importance of shaping their identity through domestic hobbies by negotiating the roles in the feminized home, which empowered men to re-define masculinity by finding a place within the lifestyle, focused on consumer culture for the everyday male audience (Courtney, 2009). This became more evident in TV programs from the 1990’s and onwards, as there was a rise in tastemakers and shapers (Lewis, 2014). However, men who liked cooking were understood as taking part in a leisure activity rather than labor, and domestic cooking for women was understood as them caring for others (Hollows, 2003). Thus, in the culinary industry the males dominate the professional position, as cooking outside of the home was perceived as ‘manly’, because women raising their voice, giving orders and being assertive, was seen as unacceptable when it came to cooking (Hollows, 2003). Jamie Oliver is a great example of someone who challenged this ‘manly’ perception, as his enthusiasm for cooking in a restaurant, landed him his first TV show, ‘The Naked Chef’, with the BBC. He demonstrated the enjoyment of food and the simplicity in making it which was emphasized even more because he was a man, who did not just enjoy cooking in a restaurant but also at home.

Jamie Oliver as a Lifestyle Expert

Oliver began his TV career with his first TV show, ‘The Naked Chef’, in 1999, at 24 years old. His portrayal of food cooking food at home, allowed him to become a recognized lifestyle expert. Lewis (2010) described a lifestyle expert as a “figure whose knowledge is tied to the ordinary and everyday”. In other words, Jamie Oliver branded his lifestyle advice, because his cooking style was an embodiment of who he was, whether the camera was on or not, he would still be the same. Oliver was able to successfully brand his lifestyle as an expert because he was an achieved celebrity (Rojek, 2001, p.18). This meant that Oliver’s viewers recognized him as someone who had a rare talent and had been able to gain great accomplishments from this, as well as fame (Rojek, 2001, p.18). Viewers considered Oliver as a role model, because he used his personal life as an occupational resource which proved his legitimacy and expertise, in-front of the many that were watching him. This is significant because in the 20th century, citizens role in consumption grew, which meant that they wanted to know more, for example, women’s magazines encouraged the females to shop for themselves and to have fun whilst doing so, and the men’s magazines encouraged them to find pleasure in doing domestic hobbies. These were considered identity shapers for both genders, as rules in what each social class could consume, eased, so individuals had the opportunity to establish personal preferences as society changed (Lewis, 2014; Pennell, 1999).

Oliver on ‘The Naked Chef’, always put on dramatic performances for his home recipes, that any one at home could follow at home. Rojek (2001) asserted his belief that someone who was perceived as common, yet considered the best of a kind, with a theatrical personality and achieved position, they will be able to grab the attention of the audience. This is a similar element to Oliver, as the presentation of his culinary skills in contrast to his robust cockney accent negotiated Oliver’s celebrity status, which allowed the audience to see him as an ordinary person, which gave a rise to his popularity as well as status. Beck (1992) argued that the rise in individualism, was a result of contemporary social change and deregulation, which meant less restrictions from social classes. This is evident through Oliver’s self-presentation on the show. He was a professional chef that spoke in use of colloquialism, using words and phrases which wasn’t expected to be heard from a cooking program and he was always dressed like he was going to meet his friends (Lewis, 2014). However, his profession in cooking allowed Oliver to re-define the skills that were considered feminine, by making cooking appear entertaining and simple, and can be imitated in the kitchen. He achieved this by avoiding the display of an excessive bossy attitude to his audience and by avoiding the use of technical language, as the audience would need to feel like they relate to him, which strengthened his influence to both female and male audience (Piper, 2015). Featherstone (1987), reasoned that, no matter the age nor the class, there will always be room for self-improvement and expression (Warde, 1997, p.15). Oliver was able to present this concept on individualism to his viewers, by showing them that change in gender relations will only occur when you disconnect from traditional social norms and make choices yourself of the lifestyle you want to live without social approval.

Jamie Oliver as a Celebrity Endorser

Star celebrities are perceived as role models by many, which becomes effective to multiple markets for advertising, as the audience admires and want to learn from these influential figures, who are considered to be the most effective when promoting personal products or services, and once a celebrity reaches this opportunity, they become a celebrity endorser (Pringle, 2004, p.218, 227). Following Oliver’s first successful series of ‘The Naked Chef’, Oliver became the face of Sainsbury’s, in 2000, making appearances on TV and radio advertisement and in-store promotions. Oliver was the living brand identity that Sainsbury’s had been looking for in a public figure, because of his devotion for cooking, but specifically the style he presented it in, as it imitated his young and energetic character (Pringle, 2004 p.220). Oliver was known for actively making the dishes while giving imperative instructions which were characterized by his use of sociolect. This meant that, he was viewed as a presenter of his own factual entertainment series on, ‘The Naked Chef’, because he branded the series, thus making it appealing to multitude of audience types, which would also pave a way for appearances in other textual consumptions (Thomas et al., 2014, p.48).

Oliver’s dramatic performances were most captivating through his use of storytelling techniques. This technique allowed his viewers to share emotional experiences with him and to make sense of their reality, which would have created positive association that cooking was enjoyable and could be performed by anyone, which is what Oliver wanted his viewers to know (Kent, 2015). This was a significant element for Sainsbury’s, as the public developed a perspective that Sainsbury’s was not approachable because their adverts portrayed them as a middle-class store, which limited their range of consumers visiting the stores (Robinson et al., 2014). This was a result of Sainsbury’s use of posh chefs (before they signed Jamie Oliver), such as Catherine Zeta-Jones. She featured in a Sainsbury’s advertisement in 1992, where she used technical language whilst giving step by step instructions, spoke in a posh manner, was dressed in formal wear, had a classical piece playing as background music, but advertisement showed more screen time of the preparation of the dish, than it did of Zeta-Jones in the process of it. This was a setback for Sainsbury’s, as it failed to focus on building a connection or relatability with potential consumers. Consequently, for any viewers, who were not posh, nor were considered as middle-class citizens, this advert would not be able to gain their interest because there was nothing relatable to them. Hence, Sainsbury’s endorsed Oliver because of his flamboyant personality, which was unexpected from a professional chef, yet allowed him to be viewed as a common man and relatable, which meant that his cockney accent, ‘laddish’ appearance and ordinary kitchen, were meanings that the audience associated with Oliver and gradually transferred to the brand (McCracken, 1989).

Jamie Oliver as a Cultural Intermediary

Pierre Bourdieu (1984) coined the term cultural intermediary and in his original concept he discussed primarily those in the developing middle class who were assisting in the flow of cultural ideas to many audiences (Bourdieu, 1984). Hence, Oliver is perceived by the public as a cultural intermediary because he gives information on culinary and lifestyle to his audience, which shapes the way the audience connect with the food media texts (Piper, 2015, p.248). During Oliver’s progression in his career, he established the importance of healthy food and commenced promotion of it. Oliver’s status gradually became even more connected to his campaigns on food issues and various other social matters, as it was to his culinary expertise, moreover, he offered his audience guides on how to live and what to consume, but also the motivation to believe in living differently, which can be considered as a form of cultural intermediaries (Lewis, 2014; Piper, 2015).

In 2005, Oliver founded the ‘Feed Me Better’ campaign, which aimed to educate the nation on the importance of healthy food selection in primary schools. This was introduced through his documentary series ‘Jamie’s School Dinners’, in 2005, where he was appalled by the poor state of school meals in the UK. His aim was to educate dinner ladies and to change children’s perspective on cooking and eating healthy food. Oliver’s appearance on the series was a drastic change, as he was seen embodying the concept of a professional chef as he wore the white coat, and chef hat, and an apron which increased his credibility amongst the dinner ladies and the pupils, when explaining information and skills that they did not possess beforehand (Gleich, 1997). Oliver was able to appeal to the masses as they watched him through their TV screens, which is one of the ways that para-social interaction occurs. Horton and Wohl (1956) examined that para-social interaction occur when a viewer interacting with those on the screen is similar to a real-life interaction, but the performer does not reciprocate this (Horton et al., 1956). Many of Oliver’s viewers saw that he possessed the same values and similarities to them, which strengthened the interaction they had with him as “the audience’s activities are not limited to either cognitive or emotional reactions to the people on the screen, but also represent social processes” (Gleich, 1997). Due to his impact on many the ‘Feed Me Better’ campaign achieved over 270,000 signatures on the petitions for change, which meant that not only did he appeal to both the working class and middle class, but he was able to identify with the viewers that were parents (Telegraph, 2005). Although he is considered ordinary, he has a high social status and he proved to his viewers that he wanted to provide the best information to live a healthy life, by showing the nation how he was prepared to make this change in primary schools.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Oliver’s career has presented him with roles that were consistent with his personality and his culinary skills. Through this, he has been able to appeal to the masses, both the working class and middle class to follow him on his journey, which is understood through his experience and the history of cooking. His persona allowed other people to relate to him, due to his use of informal manner and his ‘laddish’, which he took advantage of, as he educated them on culinary skills while presenting food as something which is enjoyable and simple. Oliver successfully branded himself, as he would not have been referred to as a ‘new chef’ but rather Jamie Oliver, because of his unique style in cooking and presentation. He represented the ‘new man’ and the ‘new lad’ as he combined his ‘laddish’ masculinity with the ‘feminized’ beliefs of the ‘new man’, which proved to his viewers that cooking can be enjoyable for both men and women (Hollow, 2003).

Bibliography

1. Bourdieu, P, 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. American Ethnologist, 13(1), pp.163-164.
2. Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
3. Catterall, P. and Obelkevich, J., 2002. Understanding Post-War British Society. 1st ed. Routledge.
4. Courtney, J., 2009. Real Men Do Housework: Ethos and Masculinity in Contemporary Domestic Advice. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), pp.66-81.
5. Donald Horton & R. Richard Wohl (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction, Psychiatry, 19:3, 215-229.
6. Eagle, L., Czarnecka, B., Dahl, S. and Lloyd, J., 2014. Marketing Communications. 1st ed. Routledge.
7. Gill, R., 2003. Power and the Production of Subjects: A Genealogy of the New Man and the New Lad. The Sociological Review, 51(1_suppl), pp.34-56.
8. Gleich, U., 1997. New Horizons in Media Psychology. (online) Parasocial Interaction with People on the Screen. pp.35-55 (Accessed 16 March 2020).
9. Hollows, J., 2003. Oliver’s Twist. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6(2), pp.229-248.
10. Hollows, J. and Jones, S., 2010. ‘At Least He’s Doing Something’: Moral Entrepreneurship and Individual Responsibility in Jamie’s Ministry of Food. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(3), pp.307-322.
11. Hughes, K., 2014. Gender Roles In The 19Th Century. [online] The British Library. (Accessed 10 March 2020).
12. Kent, M. (2015). The Power of Storytelling in Public Relations: Introducing the 20 Master Plots. Public Relations Review. 41(4) 480-489.
13. Telegraph.co.uk. 2005. Jamie Delivers His School Meals Petition to Downing St. [online] (Accessed 20 March 2020).
14. Lewis, T., 2014. The Cultural Intermediaries. London: SAGE.
15. Marsh, J., 2016. Gender Ideology & Separate Spheres in the 19Th Century – Victoria and Albert Museum. [online] Vam.ac.uk. (Accessed 12 March 2020).
16. McCracken, G., 1989. Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), p.310.
17. Pennell, S. (1999). Consumption and Consumerism in Early Modern England. The Historical Journal, 42(2), 549-564 (Accessed: March 20 2020) from www.jstor.org/stable/3021000
18. Piper, N., 2015. Jamie Oliver and Cultural Intermediation. Food, Culture & Society, 18(2), pp.245-264.
19. Pringle, H., 2004. Celebrity Sells. Chichester [etc.]: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
20. Robinson, S. and Etherington, L., 2014. Customer Loyalty. Palgrave Macmillan.
21. Rojek, C., 2001. Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books, Ltd.
22. Schreiber, B., 2019. Jamie Oliver | Biography, TV Shows, Books, & Facts. [online] Encyclopedia Britannica (Accessed 6 March 2020).
23. Thomas, B. and Round, J. 2014. Real Lives, Celebrity Stories: Narratives of Ordinary and Extraordinary People Across Media. USA: Bloomsbury Publishing.
24. Turner, G., 2013. Understanding Celebrity. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd.
25. Warde, A., 1997. Consumption, Food & Taste. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Introduction:

In his controversial essay “Celebrity Bodies,” Daniel Harris delves into the obsession with celebrity culture and the unrealistic body expectations imposed on individuals. This critical essay will analyze Harris’ arguments, examining the problematic nature of idealized celebrity bodies and the detrimental impact they have on society.

Body:

Unrealistic Beauty Standards:

Harris highlights the unrealistic beauty standards perpetuated by celebrity culture. He argues that the media’s portrayal of flawless bodies creates unattainable expectations for the general population. This obsession with achieving a specific body type not only leads to low self-esteem and body dissatisfaction but also perpetuates unhealthy behaviors such as disordered eating and excessive exercise.

Reinforcement of Objectification:

Harris criticizes the objectification of celebrities and the commodification of their bodies. He argues that the media often reduces celebrities to their physical appearances, reinforcing the idea that their worth is solely based on their looks. This objectification devalues their talents, accomplishments, and contributions, further perpetuating harmful beauty standards and shallow societal values.

Impact on Body Image and Mental Health:

The constant exposure to images of idealized celebrity bodies takes a toll on individuals’ body image and mental health. Harris argues that this constant comparison to unrealistic standards can lead to feelings of inadequacy, anxiety, and depression. Moreover, it creates a culture of body shaming and fosters a sense of never being “good enough.”

Lack of Diversity:

Harris raises concerns about the lack of diversity in the portrayal of celebrity bodies. He argues that the media predominantly promotes a narrow definition of beauty that is predominantly white, thin, and able-bodied. This exclusionary representation fails to recognize and celebrate the diverse range of bodies and perpetuates harmful stereotypes and discrimination.

Shifting the Narrative:

Harris suggests the need for a shift in societal values and media representation. He calls for a reevaluation of the emphasis placed on physical appearance and the celebration of talent, intelligence, and character instead. By challenging the narrow beauty standards and promoting diverse body representation, we can create a more inclusive and accepting society that celebrates the uniqueness of individuals.

Conclusion:

Daniel Harris’ essay “Celebrity Bodies” provides a critical examination of the unrealistic beauty standards imposed by celebrity culture. By highlighting the detrimental impact on body image, mental health, and societal values, Harris challenges the obsession with idealized bodies and calls for a shift in the narrative. It is essential to recognize the harmful effects of perpetuating narrow beauty standards and work towards promoting body positivity, diversity, and inclusivity. By celebrating all body types and valuing individuals for their talents and character, we can foster a more accepting and healthy society.

Introduction:

Meeting a celebrity can be an exciting and unforgettable experience. The opportunity to have dinner with a celebrity not only allows for a close encounter with someone admired and respected but also offers a glimpse into their personal life. In this narrative essay, I will recount my unforgettable dinner with a beloved celebrity and the impact it had on me.

Body:

Setting the Stage:

It was a chilly winter evening when I received an unexpected invitation to a charity dinner. To my astonishment, the guest of honor was none other than the renowned actress, Emma Thompson. As an avid fan of her work, I could hardly contain my excitement. The event was held in an elegant banquet hall adorned with twinkling lights and beautiful floral arrangements. The atmosphere was filled with anticipation and the buzz of conversation.

Meeting Emma Thompson:

As I made my way to my assigned seat, my heart raced with anticipation. I couldn’t believe that I was about to meet one of my favorite actresses in person. As the dinner progressed, I anxiously awaited the moment when I would have the chance to interact with her. Finally, the moment arrived when Emma Thompson graciously made her way to our table.

Engaging Conversation:

Sitting across from Emma Thompson, I was in awe of her presence. She exuded warmth and humility, instantly putting everyone at ease. As we engaged in conversation, I was struck by her genuine interest in getting to know each person at the table. She asked thought-provoking questions, allowing us to share our stories and perspectives. Her ability to listen attentively and engage in meaningful dialogue was truly inspiring.

Insight and Inspiration:

Throughout the dinner, Emma shared captivating stories from her career and personal life. Her wisdom and insights left a profound impact on me. She emphasized the importance of staying true to oneself, pursuing passions relentlessly, and using one’s platform for positive change. Her words resonated deeply within me, reminding me of the power of authenticity and the impact one can have on the world.

A Lesson in Humility:

Despite her fame and success, Emma Thompson remained humble and down-to-earth. She expressed gratitude for the opportunities she had been given and emphasized the importance of using her platform to advocate for social and environmental issues. Witnessing her humility and genuine care for others left a lasting impression on me. It served as a reminder that true success lies not just in personal achievements but in making a positive difference in the lives of others.

Conclusion:

My dinner with Emma Thompson was an experience I will cherish forever. It was more than just a celebrity encounter; it was an opportunity to witness firsthand the grace, wisdom, and humility of a remarkable individual. Emma Thompson’s ability to connect with others, share her experiences, and inspire change left an indelible mark on me. This dinner reinforced the importance of remaining true to oneself, pursuing passions, and using one’s influence for the betterment of society. It was a truly transformative and unforgettable evening, one that will continue to inspire me for years to come.