The title is biometric security. I want the assignment to be about this part (pe
The title is biometric security. I want the assignment to be about this part (penetration testing on biometric system)
References 3 for Background and Literature 4 References and formats IEEE
References must be scientific papers and literature reviews
How can business ethics theories be leveraged to address the challenges and comp
How can business ethics theories be leveraged to address the challenges and complexities associated with Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives (MSIs), particularly in terms of input legitimacy, institutionalization dynamics, and impact assessment? Furthermore, how might theoretical frameworks such as deliberative democracy theory, deontological reasoning, and integrative social contracts theory enhance our understanding of MSIs’ norm justification processes, motivations for adoption, and moral legitimacy criteria for assessing impact? Considering the diverse perspectives and moral principles involved in evaluating MSI outcomes, how can Boltanski and Thévenot’s theory of justification aid in reconciling conflicting assessments and resolving disputes regarding the moral legitimacy and effectiveness of MSIs in promoting positive societal outcomes while upholding human dignity?
Pleasa write all the answers in the file , avoid plagiarism , the work should be
Pleasa write all the answers in the file , avoid plagiarism , the work should be in your own woeds , writie references. ” and long answer of 400-500 words or more .
Iam working on an assignment related to Organization Design and Development need
Iam working on an assignment related to Organization Design and Development need support to help me learn.
Make sure to avoid plagiarism as much as possible.
Follow all instructions in the file.
Please answer in the same attached file, taking into account the required order in the file
I want a solution for me and two other files for two people, my colleagues, a to
I want a solution for me and two other files for two people, my colleagues, a total of three files without plagiarism= 3Files
You must provide the solution within 4 hours only from the time you accept the request and do not wait until the time specified on the site
Codes must be written in text and images
If personal information is required, use the attached information
You should avoid plagiarism from any website or artificial intelligence
You must provide the solution within two hours only from the time you accept the request and do not wait until the time specified on the site
Proper referencing in APA format is must
Text size 12-Times New Roman only.
Avoid plagiarisms
Avoid copying from any source
Avoid using another teacher’s solution or a similar previous student’s solution because it is a university whose system can access even the solutions published on the study pool website
You must give 100/100 correct solution
Avoid using paraphrasing programs or websites
You must provide a correct answer 100/100
You must do the solution in the same attached file
You must do the solution in the same attached file
The G. Saussy Manufacturing company is putting out 4 new electronic
components.
The G. Saussy Manufacturing company is putting out 4 new electronic
components. Each of Saussy’s 4 plants has the capacity to add 1 more
product to its current line of electronic parts. The unit manufacturing
costs for producing the different parts at the 4 plants are shown in the
accompanying table. How should Saussy assign the new products to the
plants to minimize manufacturing costs?
Refer to table attached which was supposed to be inserted here !!!!
12-38.
Buster’s Burger is a hamburger restaurant where customers form a single
line for the 1 cashier. The average number of arrivals is 1 per minute
and the Poisson distribution accurately defines this rate. The average
time to serve a customer is 30 seconds, and the exponential distribution
may be used to describe the distribution of service times.
a) What are λ and μ in this situation?
b) Using Kendall notation, what type of queuing system is this?
c) What percentage of time is the cashier busy?
d) What percentage of time is the cashier idle?
e) What is the average length of the line?
f) How many minutes does the average customer spend waiting in line?
g)
How many minutes typically elapse from the time the person enters the
line until the person gets the food and leaves the system?
Please
refer to the table that I attached which is apart of the problem.
Answer thoroughly with explanation and answers. No plagiarism !
Think about how your client identifies these four levels (who or
which group doe
Think about how your client identifies these four levels (who or
which group does it):
• Enterprise
• IT Architecture
• Business Area
• Processes within the Business Area
• Identify the goals or a few performance metrics for each level.
• How do these goals and metrics connect across the levels?
Major Project 1 – Entrepreneurial Application
The essay instructions are listed
Major Project 1 – Entrepreneurial Application
The essay instructions are listed below for the essay. The main reference is the bible. If you have any quesitons please et me know.
Context: Our world is experiencing a flood of remarkable, life-altering technologies that are currently on the edge of introduction into the world’s marketplace! Because of their “newness,” these types of technologies are sometimes described as existing on the “bleeding edge,” not just the “leading edge.” During your MBA 621 course, you have been continually scanning periodicals, newspapers, websites, databases, and online and traditional video and audio sources, to identify these forthcoming technologies.
Major Project – Executive Briefs
Students will write ten (10) executive briefs (in one Microsoft Word document) reviewing the technology ideas posted by their classmates in the Dialogue Forums for Period 1 and Period 2.
An executive brief is a concise document designed to provide high-level information to senior executives, managers, or stakeholders. It is a clear and concise document that summarizes an issue and provides recipients with an overview of important issues or events.
It’s important to keep an executive brief concise, focused, and tailored to the needs of the audience. Executives often have limited time, so the brief should be easy to digest while still providing the necessary information for informed decision-making.
Your executive brief paper reviewing your classmate’s technology ideas shall be no longer than two (2) pages per technology reviewed (20 pages total), inclusive of text and citations. A comprehensive yet concise executive brief should require at least two hours of student preparation.
Executive Brief Format
Each technology review will use the content headings listed below and will be completed in this format for each two-page executive brief.
Title
Technology Description
Commercial Uses – The executive briefs should consider at least five (5) separate creative commercial uses for the forthcoming technology.
Benefits & Hazards – The executive brief should include a critical analysis of the technology’s benefits and hazards to prospective users and/or customers.
Diffusion & Adoption – What are the possible differences in dissemination and adoption of the specific technology in various areas of the world?
Financial Implications – Develop an in-depth discussion of the financial implications for businesses using the technology.
Outcomes – What are the probable effects (positive and negative) on the related technologies and the marketplace?
Ethical Considerations – List the ethical dilemmas posed by the new technology.
Development Decisions – What criteria should be used to decide whether the technology should be developed.
Timeline – Identify the anticipated timeline for its proposed introduction.
Recommendations – Your recommendation(s) regarding the value of developing and launching the technology.
Citations & References
Evaluation Method: See SBL Grading Rubric. Each posting of a technology idea will be worth five (5) points, and each executive brief for the technology idea of a classmate will be worth five (5) points.
View Rubric
Canvas MBA Grading Rubric
Canvas MBA Grading Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
Thesis20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay includes a focused, polished thesis or sophisticated organizing principle, and develops a convincing position or compelling, unified narrative, as appropriate to the assignment.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay includes an appropriate, focused thesis or organizing principle, and develops a clear position or unified narrative, as appropriate to the assignment.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay includes a thesis or organizing principle and develops a position or clear narrative, although the position/narrative might not be exceptionally focused, polished, or convincing.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay lacks an evident organizing principle or thesis statement and fails to adequately develop a convincing position or unified narrative./ 20 pts
Organization, Development, and Support
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay demonstrates exceptional critical thinking skills and includes well-chosen, effective supporting research and information. This evidence is organized and presented persuasively, coherently and logically, with one point leading smoothly to the next.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay demonstrates strong critical thinking skills and includes good supporting research or information. This evidence is organized and presented logically and coherently, within an appropriate plan of organization.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay demonstrates some critical thinking skills and includes adequate supporting information. This evidence is organized and presented logically, within an observable plan for organization. There may be some logical fallacies, points left underdeveloped, or some ineffective narrative development.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails to demonstrate adequate critical thinking skills or include enough supporting information. This evidence or development is presented haphazardly, illogically, or ineffectively./ 20 pts
Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The formatting follows correct style and demonstrates professionalism. It correctly cites all outside sources and successfully avoids plagiarism.18 to >16 pts
Good
The formatting displays professionalism with some design errors. Citations are present with all sources in order to avoid plagiarism, but there may be minor formatting errors.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The paper is clean, but it lacks attention to detail. Citations are present for a majority of source content, but minor plagiarism occurs.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails conform to a formatting style. Citations are either absent or inconsistent in formatting, so plagiarism is present./ 20 pts
Style
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay conveys an effective, distinct author’s voice. The essay demonstrates a polished and effective writing style most appropriate for the audience, topic, and style.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay conveys an effective, author’s voice. The essay demonstrates an effective writing style appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay gives the reader some sense of the author’s voice. The essay demonstrates a suitable writing style appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails to give the reader some sense of the author’s voice. The essay fails to demonstrate an effective writing style due to inappropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose./ 20 pts
Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay is free of errors in the convention of the English language.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay is mostly free of errors in the convention of the English language.16 to >14 pts
Fair
Although the essay may contain some errors in the convention of the English language, it will be free of egregious grammatical errors.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay includes multiple errors in the convention of the English language, and some of these errors are egregious./ 20 pt
Minor Project 1 – Exegetical Study
The essay instructions are listed below for t
Minor Project 1 – Exegetical Study
The essay instructions are listed below for the essay. The main reference is the bible. If you have any quesitons please et me know.
God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” (Genesis 1:28, NIV)
Content: In Genesis 1-2, The Hebrew Scriptures describe in successive ways the creation of the world and the Divine purpose of mankind. Utilizing the exegetical skills of narrative analysis, first, identify the main tenets of the Creation mandate given by God to mankind as they might relate to business. Second, as the Creation mandate anticipates mankind’s development and adoption of technology, identify the role of innovation and creativity vis-á-vis technology in the Creation mandate. Finally, using what you have identified above, write an essay in which you describe the purpose and call to business as seen in the Creation mandate of Genesis 1-2. In this essay, also explore how an understanding of innovation and creativity as implied in the Creation mandate could play a role in the construction, adaptation, and use of technology in business for the 21st Century.
Format: The essay should be 1,500 words in length using APA style.
Due date: End of period
View Rubric
Canvas MBA Grading Rubric
Canvas MBA Grading Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
Thesis20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay includes a focused, polished thesis or sophisticated organizing principle, and develops a convincing position or compelling, unified narrative, as appropriate to the assignment.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay includes an appropriate, focused thesis or organizing principle, and develops a clear position or unified narrative, as appropriate to the assignment.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay includes a thesis or organizing principle and develops a position or clear narrative, although the position/narrative might not be exceptionally focused, polished, or convincing.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay lacks an evident organizing principle or thesis statement and fails to adequately develop a convincing position or unified narrative./ 20 pts
Organization, Development, and Support
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay demonstrates exceptional critical thinking skills and includes well-chosen, effective supporting research and information. This evidence is organized and presented persuasively, coherently and logically, with one point leading smoothly to the next.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay demonstrates strong critical thinking skills and includes good supporting research or information. This evidence is organized and presented logically and coherently, within an appropriate plan of organization.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay demonstrates some critical thinking skills and includes adequate supporting information. This evidence is organized and presented logically, within an observable plan for organization. There may be some logical fallacies, points left underdeveloped, or some ineffective narrative development.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails to demonstrate adequate critical thinking skills or include enough supporting information. This evidence or development is presented haphazardly, illogically, or ineffectively./ 20 pts
Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The formatting follows correct style and demonstrates professionalism. It correctly cites all outside sources and successfully avoids plagiarism.18 to >16 pts
Good
The formatting displays professionalism with some design errors. Citations are present with all sources in order to avoid plagiarism, but there may be minor formatting errors.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The paper is clean, but it lacks attention to detail. Citations are present for a majority of source content, but minor plagiarism occurs.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails conform to a formatting style. Citations are either absent or inconsistent in formatting, so plagiarism is present./ 20 pts
Style
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay conveys an effective, distinct author’s voice. The essay demonstrates a polished and effective writing style most appropriate for the audience, topic, and style.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay conveys an effective, author’s voice. The essay demonstrates an effective writing style appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay gives the reader some sense of the author’s voice. The essay demonstrates a suitable writing style appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails to give the reader some sense of the author’s voice. The essay fails to demonstrate an effective writing style due to inappropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose./ 20 pts
Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay is free of errors in the convention of the English language.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay is mostly free of errors in the convention of the English language.16 to >14 pts
Fair
Although the essay may contain some errors in the convention of the English language, it will be free of egregious grammatical errors.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay includes multiple errors in the convention of the English language, and some of these errors are egregious./ 20 pts
Total Points: 0
Minor Project 2 – Sinking of the Vasa
The essay instructions are listed below fo
Minor Project 2 – Sinking of the Vasa
The essay instructions are listed below for the essay. The main reference is the bible. If you have any quesitons please et me know.
Whose fault is it then? – Swedish High Court
a. Content: On a balmy Sunday morning in August 1628, almost the entire populace of Stockholm, Sweden turned out for the festivities surrounding the launch of the Vasa, the most powerful and ornamented vessel ever commissioned by his Excellency King Gustavus II Adolphus for the Royal Navy. No expense had been spared in the construction of this sophisticated modern warship, which cost more than 5% of the Swedish GNP to build. The finest shipbuilders and artisans had spent months constructing a vessel designed to strike fear in the heart of Sweden’s enemies. While still in the harbor, the crew set the sails of the Vasa. She immediately keeled over, with seawater pouring through the gun ports and over the decks. The Vasa sank to the bottom of Stockholm harbor, carrying fifty sailors to their grave.
Complete MBA-level research and study the design, construction, and ultimate demise of the Vasa. Identify each group of “customers” in the Vasa project, what their competing needs were, and how you identified those needs. Thoroughly spell out the lessons regarding the management of technology innovation that might be gained from the Vasa, and how those lessons should be applied to modern-day corporations.
b. Format: Your audience for this paper is practicing managers in your industry. The paper should use the style (e.g., APA) appropriate for a relevant, popular press publication and be approximately 2,000 words in length. Support your paper with references from assigned readings and independent research from the Regent Library databases.
Due date: End of the period
View Rubric
Canvas MBA Grading Rubric
Canvas MBA Grading Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
Thesis20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay includes a focused, polished thesis or sophisticated organizing principle, and develops a convincing position or compelling, unified narrative, as appropriate to the assignment.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay includes an appropriate, focused thesis or organizing principle, and develops a clear position or unified narrative, as appropriate to the assignment.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay includes a thesis or organizing principle and develops a position or clear narrative, although the position/narrative might not be exceptionally focused, polished, or convincing.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay lacks an evident organizing principle or thesis statement and fails to adequately develop a convincing position or unified narrative./ 20 pts
Organization, Development, and Support
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay demonstrates exceptional critical thinking skills and includes well-chosen, effective supporting research and information. This evidence is organized and presented persuasively, coherently and logically, with one point leading smoothly to the next.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay demonstrates strong critical thinking skills and includes good supporting research or information. This evidence is organized and presented logically and coherently, within an appropriate plan of organization.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay demonstrates some critical thinking skills and includes adequate supporting information. This evidence is organized and presented logically, within an observable plan for organization. There may be some logical fallacies, points left underdeveloped, or some ineffective narrative development.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails to demonstrate adequate critical thinking skills or include enough supporting information. This evidence or development is presented haphazardly, illogically, or ineffectively./ 20 pts
Formatting
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The formatting follows correct style and demonstrates professionalism. It correctly cites all outside sources and successfully avoids plagiarism.18 to >16 pts
Good
The formatting displays professionalism with some design errors. Citations are present with all sources in order to avoid plagiarism, but there may be minor formatting errors.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The paper is clean, but it lacks attention to detail. Citations are present for a majority of source content, but minor plagiarism occurs.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails conform to a formatting style. Citations are either absent or inconsistent in formatting, so plagiarism is present./ 20 pts
Style
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay conveys an effective, distinct author’s voice. The essay demonstrates a polished and effective writing style most appropriate for the audience, topic, and style.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay conveys an effective, author’s voice. The essay demonstrates an effective writing style appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose.16 to >14 pts
Fair
The essay gives the reader some sense of the author’s voice. The essay demonstrates a suitable writing style appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay fails to give the reader some sense of the author’s voice. The essay fails to demonstrate an effective writing style due to inappropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose./ 20 pts
Mechanics
20 to >18 pts
Excellent
The essay is free of errors in the convention of the English language.18 to >16 pts
Good
The essay is mostly free of errors in the convention of the English language.16 to >14 pts
Fair
Although the essay may contain some errors in the convention of the English language, it will be free of egregious grammatical errors.14 to >0 pts
Poor
The essay includes multiple errors in the convention of the English language, and some of these errors are egregious./ 20 pts