Category: Bullying

Bullying behavior is a severe issue among school-age children and teenagers. It has an impact on individuals who bully others, those who bully themselves, those who bully others, as well as onlookers who watch the bullying incident in both the short and long term. Bullying is a problem that is crucial to the field of public health based on the impact it has on abused children. Therefore, this essay addresses the negative effects of bullying on children and the ways of overcoming the problem.

Bullied children frequently have emotional and social problems. They struggle not only to make friends but also to keep strong friendships going. Low self-esteem is closely tied to some aspects of this battle. The cruel and hateful things other children say about them have a direct impact on their lack of self-esteem. For example, kids who hear the labels fat or losers frequently start to believe these things to be true. Additionally, a spectrum of emotions is frequently experienced by bully victims. They could feel hostile, resentful, exposed, defenseless, frustrated, lonely, and cut off from their peers. As a result, individuals could skip class and turn to drink and narcotics to dull their suffering. Moreover, if bullying persists, victims may experience melancholy and even consider suicide.

Children who are the objects of bullying may eventually experience what is known as learned helplessness, which is the belief that they are unable to alter the circumstance, and as such, they give up trying (Jadambaa et al.,2019). The downward spiral towards depression then gets worse. This causes a sense of helplessness and the conviction that there is no escape. Bullied children may struggle with self-esteem issues, have trouble forming and sustaining relationships, and avoid social situations as they get older. They might also find it difficult to trust others, which could have an effect on both their interpersonal and professional connections. Even worse, kids might start telling themselves lies about bullying, including that it was not as horrible as they thought it was. Additionally, they might blame themselves for not fighting back.

Bullied children frequently struggle academically as well. Children who are bullied find it difficult to concentrate on their studies. In fact, one of the initial indicators that a youngster is being bullied is declining grades. Bullying may also keep kids up at night, keeping them from remembering homework or keeping them from paying attention in class. Children who are bullied may also skip class or school in an effort to stop the bullying. Falling grades may potentially be a consequence of this behavior. Additionally, if grades start to slip, the bullied child will already be under a lot of stress. For instance, students in schools with high levels of bullying performed worse on standardized examinations than students in schools with strong anti-bullying initiatives. The fact that kids frequently show less interest in their studies because they are too preoccupied with or concerned about the bullying is one potential explanation for the lower test results at schools where bullying is widespread.

It is crucial to create rules that thoroughly address the issue, given the consequences bullying has on kids and their parents. All settings where children are bullied should establish and execute anti-bullying policies, but schools in particular. The health department should arrange for activities to be held in schools. Here, the goal is to provide support and therapy to students who have been bullied. Such children need to be talked to in order to help them regain their self-esteem because they are psychologically affected. It is crucial to remember that bullying is a systemic issue that requires a systemic solution. Time must pass for the solution to take effect.

Even if they have the best of intentions, zero-tolerance policies regarding bullies frequently fail because it is impossible to totally eradicate bullying in schools. According to research, 20% of students admit to bullying another student at some point during their time in school, yet excluding 20% of them from class is definitely not the solution (Jadambaa et al.,2019). A bully requires positive role models; therefore, surrounding them with good students can help to overcome the issue of bullying.

To conclude, bullying may have detrimental short- and long-term effects on childrens social, emotional, physical, and psychological growth. Although many people may not believe it, the bully also suffers as a result of the victims bullying actions. It is now recognized as a complex web of predatory actions and attitudes that appear in many parts of the childs life rather than just a straightforward act of physical or emotional hostility. It is clear that bullying has turned into a major public health issue, and it is the duty of every member of the school community to do all possible to lessen and ultimately eradicate bullying in our schools. Schools need to address this rising issue, and many are doing so by putting in place initiatives to prevent bullying. Every kid has a right to a secure learning environment, and it is the duty of educational leaders to put policies in place that will lessen bullying in schools.

Reference

Jadambaa, A., Thomas, H. J., Scott, J. G., Graves, N., Brain, D., & Pacella, R. (2019). Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 53(9), 878-888.

General understanding of bullying by Dumfries and Galloway Councils

Bulling and any kinds of abuse at the workplace are punished severely at most companies and are usually followed by the government of the region. People have the right to work in the company they like and which is interested in the services, are provided by people, but at the same time, nobody has the right to provide abuse and bullying at work, as this is punished by law. The current paper is going to analyze and evaluate Dumfries and Galloway Councils Policy against bullying and code of practice on dignity at work.

Starting with the analysis of bullying in general and its understanding by Dumfries and Galloway Council it should be mentioned that workplace bullying is an abuse of the power provided by seniority in position or physical, psychological or social ascendancy over colleagues at work (Policy against bullying 1). Abuse may be provided in different forms, beginning with mental abuse and finishing with physical abuse. Managers of any company should follow the culture of communication at work and create a successful environment, which supports the effectiveness of work.

Bulling at work effects

Bulling and violation of workers leads to serious effects, which disturb not only the working abilities of people but also lead to the violation of individual peace of any person and harassment. Bulling at work usually reduces the productivity of work and leads to other effects, which appear to be the barriers to become a free person in society. According to Dumfries and Galloway Councils Policy against bullying, bullying at work may become the reason for mental and physical health problems. Furthermore, bullying is unacceptable behavior, which must be punished, as there is no justification for bad treatment (Policy against bullying 2). The violated person is in constant fear and the productivity of work is reduced to a minimum. Moreover, no new and innovative ideas are offered as the fear of punishment and humiliation may follow the offer. It has always been important for any person to keep dignity clear, so they should better work calmly without offering new ideas than be humiliated for their bold plans.

The recommendations for bulling reduction at the workplace from Dumfries and Galloway Council

Dumfries and Galloway Council is sure that the main aim of the staff manager in the company is to create an oppression-free culture, to persecute unacceptable behavior of workers, and to maintain an encouraging and successful environment among workers. Colleagues should respect each other, and it is the managers responsibility to create the policies of the companys behavior and to make it the mode to follow. Staff may also take part in the development of the system of company relations, where creative and constructive views are welcomed. One of the main activities for the reduction of bullying at work, provided by Dumfries and Galloway Council, is the workers ability to bring a complaint to the Council about bullying at work and the measures will be provided at once (Policy against bullying 2).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Dumfries and Galloway Council has created the Policy against bullying, which functions in the whole region. Policy against bullying maintains the rules of behavior in the companies, provides the guidelines to the workers in the case of bullying and their dignity violation at work, and implements the recommendations of how the communication in the company should be developed with the aim to measure the possibilities of bulling to a minimum.

Works Cited

Policy against bulling. Dumfries and Galloway Council. 2008.

Introduction

The relationship between medical staff is an important aspect that determines the quality of work in a particular institution and the healthcare system as a whole. However, in the practice of even the most well-known and respected clinics, one can find cases of bullying, which often arise among nurses. The humiliation of the personal dignity of employees is a serious violation of nursing ethics, and if the behavior of junior medical personnel does not meet the established standards of communication, it makes one doubt the qualifications and competence of workers. In order to assess this problem from different perspectives, the reasons for bullying need to be defined to understand what factors influence conflicts in the nursing collective and cause the humiliation of some employees by others.

Factors Influencing Bullying

The cases of moral humiliation in nursing communities may have a different background. According to Wright and Khatri (2015), the frequency of bullying in the workplace is alarming and even more so because bullying incidences are usually underreported (p. 140). It should force the heads of medical departments to pay particular attention to the relationship in the team and to resolve any conflicts timely. Quite often, inadequate leadership and indifference to employee relationships are the causes of disagreement, and because of failures to take action, bullying cases increase.

Different researchers give various reasons for bullying in the nursing team. Strandmark, Rahm, Wilde Larsson, Nordström, and Rystedt (2017) offer a version that the reason is the rough assessment of victims work and the inclination of some employees to violate the moral and ethical norms of communication. Granstra (2015) mentions the concept of horizontal bullying, that is, directly among employees of the same rank. According to the author, several factors, such as a hierarchical workplace culture, increase the likeliness of bullying taking place (Granstra, 2015, p. 250). Different conflict background, however, requires timely interventions because disagreements in the team not only exert a depressing effect on the victims of bullying but also adversely influence the work process and, as a consequence, patient outcomes.

Methods to Combat Bullying

A few important steps should be taken in order to stop humiliation among colleagues. First of all, as Wilson (2016) remarks, an important first step in dealing with bullying is for the individual to recognize and admit that they are being bullied (p. 305). Timely complaints to management may allow stopping moral pressure from other employees. The author also mentions humor as one of the effective ways to overcome bullying (Wilson, 2016). If a nurse does not take humiliation seriously and shows offenders that their words and deeds have no response except for laughter, it will certainly put them to a standstill and stop the moral pressure. On the whole, one of the key ways is not to succumb to bullying. If it causes severe discomfort, it is essential to seek help from those who can stop this unscrupulous employees behavior.

Conclusion

Determining the factors that influence bullying in nursing can help to assess the reasons for this behavior among employees and to find ways to deal with it. Adequate and timely managers responses are significant since conflict resolution is the essential component of successful leadership. Despite the different backgrounds of bullying, humiliation always brings discomfort to victims and adversely affects the quality of care and patient outcomes.

References

Granstra, K. (2015). Nurse against nurse: Horizontal bullying in the nursing profession. Journal of Healthcare Management, 60(4), 249-257.

Strandmark K, M., Rahm, G., Wilde Larsson, B., Nordström, G., & Rystedt, I. (2017). Preventive strategies and processes to counteract bullying in health care settings: Focus group discussions. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38(2), 113-121. Web.

Wilson, J. L. (2016). An exploration of bullying behaviours in nursing: A review of the literature. British Journal of Nursing, 25(6), 303-306. Web.

Wright, W., & Khatri, N. (2015). Bullying among nursing staff: Relationship with psychological/behavioral responses of nurses and medical errors. Health Care Management Review, 40(2), 139-147. Web.

Introduction

Bullying is usually associated with aggression and abuse of power. It can occur regardless of social status or income; however, there is a direct connection between bullying incidents and poor parenting. A significant number of these incidents occur within educational establishments. Bullying takes many forms, such as physical, verbal, relational aggression, cyberbullying, and prejudicial harassment. A properly chosen parenting style, either authoritative, or permissive, or uninvolved, or authoritarian, can produce effective defensive tools for children to stay protected against bullying. Parents should educate their children to create their own safe environment for healthy development, both physical and mental, guaranteeing the absence of abusive behavior or victimization. Using recent studies and opinions, this paper aims at proving that there is a relationship between parenting styles and bullying with both direct and indirect impacts.

The Concept of Bullying

Bullying is an essential concern for society and education establishments. Every fifth student is being bullied at school, and every third student experienced cyberbullying (Bullying Statistics, 2020). The consequences of this problem can be psychological and physiological (Rajendran et al., 2016). They may also be immediate, like an injury, or revealed several years later. Bullying triggers a feeling of insecurity in children, when they develop a distrust of people, including the family, and depression caused by isolation from society (Moore et al., 2017). Some physical consequences of bullying, such as bruises, traumas, and pain, are usually noticed at once (Rajendran et al., 2016). At the same time, parents are responsible for psychological control, and the identification of psychological effects, such as stress, headache, and insomnia, that happen later, cannot be ignored (Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019). These outcomes include depression, anxiety, self-harming, aggression, and victimization and are characterized by a significant negative impact on the quality of life (Moore et al., 2017). The connection between bullying and parenting is a critical issue that influences a childs future social life, provokes multiple emotions, and determines socializing abilities that are revealed with time.

Parenting Styles

The choice of an appropriate parenting style usually contributes to the childs mental and physical self-defense and behaviors. Parents perform role models, and it is crucial for them to demonstrate the best examples for their children (Njagi et al., 2018). However, the styles parents choose to cooperate with their children depend on a variety of factors, including available resources, emotional well-being in a family, or the influence of other illnesses or disorders (Rajendran et al., 2016). Within the frames of this research, four main types of parenting styles have to be identified: authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and uninvolved.

There is a relationship between different parenting styles and associated bullying, which means that even the most professional approaches could cause problems and support bullying behaviors. For example, an authoritarian style is based on the intention of parents to control and assess children as per an absolute set of standards, with high demandingness and low responsiveness (Gómez-Ortiz et al., 2016; Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019). As a result, children are raised weak, with limited powers, and observe violence regularly, which rouses bullying (Wernert, 2016). Permissive parents demonstrate their love, warmth, and desire to become childrens best friends (Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019). Wernert (2016) explains bullying possibility in this case as an outcome of the lack of respect, rules, and control when children are allowed to do everything they want. An uninvolved parenting style means that parents do not want to control their children, as well as do not find it necessary to share their love and warmth (Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019). Children of such parents know nothing about self-worth and care, which makes them easy targets for bullying at schools or other establishments.

There is also an authoritative style of parenting that becomes a frequent topic for modern evaluations. Wernert (2016) calls it an ideal style that is hardly associated with bullying because children are raised in a democratic fashion and receive enough attention and love to set priorities. Kuppens and Ceulemans (2019) discover that the authoritative style is the one with the most favored outcomes. According to Rajendran et al. (2016), such parents offer support to their childrens autonomy. Children learn how to behave, solve problems, and establish fair relationships with different people under various conditions.

Bullying and Parenting

Sometimes, it is hard for parents to understand what style they prefer in the development of their relationships with children. However, Nocentini et al. (2019) underline that people who grow up in healthy family environments are bullied less often. This is related to the appropriate parenting philosophies, ethical values, and personal life experiences that are shared with the purpose of demonstrating appropriate lessons. When children experience bullying inside the family (when one or both parents show inappropriate action with abusive behavior), the chances to suffer from bullying in other establishments raise (Rajendran et al., 2016). Therefore, one should remember that parenting could cause extreme deterioration and affect physical and mental development in the future.

Bullying, Parenting, and the Modern Environment

In modern society, bullying is no longer a problem of educational facilities only. It also extends to every aspect of life, and the role of parents in controlling bullying triggers and outcomes cannot be neglected. Bullying exists in various forms today, including physical bullying, verbal bullying, relational aggression, cyberbullying, and prejudicial bullying (Rajendran et al., 2016). Physical bullying may be demonstrated by parents (kicking, beating, or slapping) and shape the future behaviors of children (Rajendran et al., 2016). Verbal bullying, when parents use verbal insults or threats to punish or control a child, increases the childs vulnerability to humiliation and offense at other places (Rajendran et al., 2016). Relational aggression is negatively affecting other peoples relationships by manipulating them, and parents (especially divorced and remarried) find it normal to manipulate children for their own benefits (Rajendran et al., 2016). Cyberbullying is another outcome of poor parenting because of the impossibility of controlling the impact of social media (Rajendran et al., 2016). Finally, prejudicial bullying considers racial, cultural, or gender stereotypes as a reason for bullying. It usually occurs in traditional and deeply religious communities.

Effective Parental Styles for Protecting Children

Appropriate parenting is the key to childrens healthy development and prevents them from being bullied. It is essential to communicate with them so that children can learn how to detect the problem and solve it without any interference from the family (Nocentini et al., 2019). Parents also must remember that even overprotection can result in more bullying. The most effective way to teach kids how to resist bullies is a parental example in different social situations. If parents are bullied by other people, there is a higher chance that their children would be bullied as well. Therefore, the most appropriate parenting style would be teaching in a natural environment. Parental interventions, such as nurturing, discipline, teaching, monitoring, managing, should be implemented appropriately and only if necessary, to establish trust between parents and children (Rajendran et al., 2016). Too strict or too lenient parental styles must be controlled to avoid the production of oppressors and oppresses. Unequal application of these styles has the potential to harm the parent-child connection (Nocentini et al., 2019). Therefore, it is crucial to teach and monitor children but let them have some freedom.

Conclusion

The issue of childhood bullying and its direct connection to the parenting style creates many discussions and provokes new positions and attitudes. Parents should teach their children how to identify and avoid bullies with minimum damage, but most importantly, they must appropriately show the example that produces favored results. There are several types of parents in modern society, including authoritative, permissive, uninvolved, and authoritarian, and each of them has its benefits and impact on bullying behaviors. It is essential to develop trustful relationships in a family so children can rely on their parents help and understanding of bullying. Parents, in their turn, must ensure their childrens ability to deal with bullying if it happens to them, which proves the connection between chosen concepts.

References

Bullying statistics. (2020). Web.

Gómez-Ortiz, O., Romera, E. M., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2016). Parenting styles and bullying. The mediating role of parental psychological aggression and physical punishment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 51, 132143. Web.

Kuppens, S., & Ceulemans, E. (2019). Parenting styles: A closer look at a well-known concept. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(1), 168-181. Web.

Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Suetani, S., Thomas, H. J., Sly, P. D., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60-76. Web.

Njagi, S. N., Mwania, J. M., & Manyasi, B. (2018). The role of parenting styles on violence among students in secondary schools in Embu County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(1), 8-18. Web.

Nocentini, A., Fiorentini, G., Paola, L. D., & Menesini, E. (2019). Parents, family characteristics and bullying behavior: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 4150. Web.

Rajendran, K., Kruszewski, E., &Halperin, J. (2016). Parenting style influences bullying: A longitudinal study comparing children with and without behavioural problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(2), 188-195. Web.

Wernert, S. (2016). The connection between parenting styles and bullying behaviors. Oregon City Schools Anti-Bullying Site. Web.

Bullying

Bullying is one of the major social challenges facing youth in our schools today. Ann and Aidan (2004) observe that there are two main types of bullying namely indirect and direct bullying. Students directly bully each other by fighting, kicking, pushing, and attacking using any available weapon. Indirect bullying entails gossiping, discriminating, teasing, and cyberbullying. The authors also denote that bullying creates a very poor environment for learning and adversely incapacitates the victims.

This paper entails an empirical research study that was carried out on a student to study the level of bullying in the specified school. It has been followed by an analysis of the findings through a review of theoretical literature.

A grade five child was chosen for the interview to ensure a higher probability of getting factual statistics since studies have shown that the youngest learners in terms of age are the most vulnerable victims to bullying (Gordon, Kathryn & Ann, 2012). The interview was conducted during a normal school day when students were out for a short break. The student being interviewed was engaged randomly in a conversation that was started at one edge of the football court.

The boy looked relaxed and responded to the interviewers questions well. Their twenty-minute interview focused on the general aspects of the students life in and outside the school, especially when relating with his peers. The interview questions and respective responses from the interviewee are tabled below.

Analysis

Deborah and Kathleen (2011) observe that out of the five developmental domains in children, cognitive and social developments are vividly distinguished from emotional and physical developments since they are greatly influenced by the outside inputs into a childs life cycle. Besides, the existence of bullying modifies the victims abstract thinking, problem-solving skills, the general perception of suffering, social task attachment, and interaction with others.

Gordon, Kathryn, and Ann (2012) posit that a young persons development into a cognitive socially healthy individual takes several factors into play. For instance, the interviewee exhibited significant evidence of bullying at school. This was characterized by materialism, heroism, and immortality when he claimed that all he wants is to be rich even at his age. The impact of bullying was profound as noted in the nature and mood of the interviewees reactions to the questions.

The intellectual development is dictated by the ability of a student to continue analyzing what has been taught in class and willingness to have dreams triggered by an interest in a specific part of the curriculum (Gordon, Kathryn & Ann, 2012).

In the interview, it was noted that Alex had been disoriented by the bully game in school and his wishes were excluded from mathematics which he finds to be simple. The demerits of bullying have pinned life out of the students world and he does enjoy school although he is still at school-going age.

References

Ann, M. & Aidan, M. (2004). Bullying: the truth. New York: Oxford University Press.

Deborah, P. & Kathleen, M. (2011). Blackwell handbook of early childhood development, Philadelphia: Wiley & Sons.

Gordon, R. Kathryn, W. & Ann, G. (2012). Beginning essentials in early childhood education. New York: Cengage Learning.

Bullying has become one of the most urgent problems in modern society. It comes from different sources and affects victims psychological state and quality of life. In this essay, we analyze the causes of bullying in school, its effects on victims, and mitigation measures that should be taken.

Cause and Effect of Bullying: Essay Introduction

Bullying is one of the main challenges children face at school. It is a global problem that is currently affecting many youth. The rate at which bullying cases are reported causes many worries to parents. The issue is severe to the extent that many children have learned to live with it, and some have created the notion that bullying is part of their life in the early years of their development. Several cases, especially in the United States and Japan, have been reported about childrens humiliation, mistreatment, physical attacks, and even rape cases of young female learners.

The effects of bullying on a child can be very traumatizing if not carefully addressed. These effects sometimes are long-lasting and can provoke the victim to take dangerous measures to forget the incidents. According to Rigby (64), bullying experiences can cost the lives of the victims if not prevented in time. In New York, it is reported that a young immigrant killed herself due to excessive bullying. This researcher argues that it is high time for the issue of bullying in schools to be addressed. The notion that bullying is a rite of passage should be eliminated. This research paper aims to explore the causes, effects, and possible solutions to bullying in schools.

Cause of Bullying in School

According to Olweus (34), many reasons lead to bullying in schools. One of the main causes is the cultural factor. This includes race and ethnicity. A child may be a bully or a victim if he or she comes from a majority or minority race, respectively. Another cause of bullying in schools is the nature of life a child is exposed to. In many families in developed countries, children can comfortably watch TV even in their bedrooms. Instead of studying, such children spend their time playing computer games. Their games make them bullies because they see others practice the same.

According to Tattumand Lane (27), high expectations of parents of their children contribute to bullying. The reason is that a child will spend much time studying to perform well and meet the parents expectations. Failure to achieve the target may develop stress in a child, and they will express anger through shouting or bullying fellow learners. Another cause of bullying in schools emanates from the familys social status. A child from a humble background will always have some pressurizing needs that are not met. This child will always want to express this frustration to fellow learners, especially those from stable families, by bullying them.

Effects

The effects of bullying, as mentioned above, can be very traumatizing. Victims of bullying may opt to drop out of school because of the trauma they experience. Others may develop irresponsible behavior that involves missing classes on most occasions. School irregularities among the learners result in poor performance. Bullying leads to stress among the victims. This, in turn, results in poor communication with these children. McGrath (44) argues that, in some cases, excessive bullying can lead to victims committing suicide to escape from painful experiences and memories.

Some of the effects are short-term, but if not well addressed, they can result in serious complications. The victims may have bed-wetting problems, unexplained worries, and digestive problems because of the fear instilled in them. Some victims with the intention of hitting back may develop very destructive behavior. Other victims may end up engaging in drug abuse to make them forget their painful experiences. Bullying affects the normal development of victims and makes them have low self-esteem (Dupper 62)./

Bullying Causes and Effects: Mitigation Measures

Mitigating bullying in schools is not a one-person battle. Since it is a global issue, it calls for a collaborative and participatory approach to addressing the problem. Teachers, parents, and policymakers have a significant role in curbing this bad behavior in schools. Teachers spend much of their time with the learners and, therefore, can easily control their behavior while in school. They should be tough and keen to identify the bullies and expel or suspend them from school to avoid spreading such behaviors among other learners. School administrators should seriously punish the physically strong learners who take advantage of the weak ones by mistreating them. The administration should not tolerate any sign of bullying within the school (Tattum&Lane 53)./

Parents should also be strict with their children and avoid anything that may turn them into bullies. Watching TV and playing computer games must be regulated at home. The child should be seriously punished if he or she shows some bullying behavior while at home. The government also has an essential role in curbing this vice. Policymakers must enact policies that address bullying in schools. These policies should be implemented and strictly adhered to, and whoever violates them should face the law irrespective of age. All the stakeholders, including the humanitarian non-governmental organizations, must join hands to curb this vice in society. Through this collaborative approach, success will be achieved.

Works Cited

Dupper, David. School Bullying: New Perspectives on a Growing Problem. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.

McGrath, Mary. School Bullying: Tools for Avoiding Harm and Liability. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin Press, 2007. Print.

Olweus, Dan. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993. Print.

Rigby, Ken. Bullying in Schools and What to Do About It. Melbourne, Vic: ACER, 2007. Print.

Tattum, Delwyn, and David Lane. Bullying in Schools. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham, 1988. Print.

Essay about Bullying in School: Introduction

Child bullying is a problem that has affected many young children and adolescents. It can be done physically or verbally. It may also take the form of cyberbullying in the case of those who use social networks (Kowalski & Limber, 2007) or threatening.

A child can be bullied by their mates, or they can be bullied by adults. In fact, there are parents who bully their own children. Bullying is an issue that is very important in the public health sector. This is based on the effects it has on children who are victimized. Therefore, as a practitioner in the field of Maternal and Child Health, it is important to address this issue with the seriousness that it deserves.

Bullying in Schools: Essay Main Body

This problem needs to be addressed by all stakeholders ranging from the childrens parents, teachers, as well as the Maternal and Child Health practitioners. The importance of this issue in public health is underlined by the fact that bullying affects the psychology of children.

They have low self-esteem; they may become physically weak and may have poor social skills. The victims find it hard to relate with other children since they may have difficulties to stand for themselves. This is a problem that is likely to cause children to drop out of school, and the loss of self-esteem may persist into adulthood.

Bullying is a vice that has affected children, especially those that have attained school age. Mostly, it occurs in schools where children are bullied by their counterparts who may be stronger than them. It is estimated that about 20 to 30 percent of children are bullied, or are involved in bullying incidents (Public safety, 2011).

Over the last three decades, the issue of bullying has gained a lot of attention across the United States. This has been especially due to increased attention by the media on suicides and homicides, which are influenced by bullying (Dake, Price & Telljoham, 2003).

Bullying has a number of effects to the victimized children. The parents of these children can also be affected. It affects the future relations of the children. The child is likely to drop grades in school. The grades are likely to drop because the child may not be attentive in class. Instead, they spend a lot of time wondering about the bullies they receive from fellow children.

They wonder what they may have done wrong and what is likely to happen to them after classes. On the other hand, parents also keep wondering and worrying about their children. As a result, they may not even concentrate at their workplaces. In this case, parents are not sure of what might happen to their children. They are stressed up by those issues (Staff, 2011).

The field of Maternal and Child Health has an obligation to address issues and problems that affect children, mothers, as well as young people who have special needs. It also addresses the issues of families, which have children with special needs. Bullying is a problem that affects young children who attend school, their parents, as well as youths.

Therefore, as a practitioner in the field of Maternal and Child Health, one should be able to make a decision that can help in solving these problems. Stopping bullying helps in promoting the welfare of children and their parents. They are best positioned to set up programs, which help in addressing the special needs of children.

Therefore, since bullying is a special issue that affects children, practitioners should give it the attention that it deserves. Bullying affects the general health of children. It further affects their parents, especially mothers. This makes bullying an important issue in the field of Maternal and Child Health. Maternal and Child Health should have an obligation to prevent bullying and violence among children (Public safety, 2011).

Considering the effects that bullying has on children and their parents, it is imperative to develop policies that address the issue in depth. Anti-bullying policies should be developed and implemented in all areas where children are bullied, especially within schools.

Amid the increased awareness of the harmful effects associated with bullying, many schools have developed anti-bullying policies. The department of Maternal and Child Health should boost the development of these policies and contribute to making them effective. This is a great challenge for all practitioners in this field.

Bullying in Schools: Essay Conclusion

The policies that need to be implemented include the establishment of training programs. The programs established by the Maternal and Child Health practitioners are meant to train teachers on ways to handle children and help them stop the bullying behavior.

Furthermore, the adult needs to help children to stop bullying. Therefore, as a practitioner in the field of Maternal and Child Health, one needs to advise adults, including parents of children involved in bullying, on how they can handle the cases and help children stop the vice. Programs to train such adults on how to do this should be established (Public safety, 2011).

There should be programs organized to take place in schools by the Maternal and Child Health department. Here, the aim will be to offer guidance and counseling to students who are victims of bullying.

Such children are affected psychologically, and they need to be talked to so as to help them regain their self-esteem. It is important to note that bullying is a systematic problem and thus needs to be addressed systematically. The solution needs to be given time to take effect.

References

Dake, J.A., Price, J.H. & Telljoham, S.K. (2003). The Nature and Extent of Bullying at School. Journal of School Health, 73 (5): 173-180.

Kowalski, R.M. & Limber, S.P. (2007). Electronic Bullying Among Middle School Students. Journal of Adolescent Health 41: S22S30.

Public safety. (2011). First steps to stop bullying: Adults helping children aged 4 to 11.

Staff, H. (2011). Bullying.

A Study Of The Individual Who Bullys In The Work Place

Bullying at workplaces has received increased attention from the media (Beckford, 2008; Parker-Pope, 2008; Klein, 2008; Said, 2007). A recent survey in the UK showed that 56 percent of employees believe that they face serious problems in the workplace due to bullying (Beckford, 2008). Workplace bullying is a serious problem with huge costs attached to it in terms of loss of working days (BBC News, 2000).

Given this, media hype about workplace bullying, and an expected rise in bullying rates in workplaces due to the present financial crisis (Beckford, 2008), the topic requires academic attention to ascertain the factors that induce such behavior in individuals. Hence, it is necessary to look at workplace bullying and the factors that lead an individual to consort to such aggressive behavior.

Research Question

Workplace bullying has received commendable academic attention starting from early research on mobbing in Scandinavia, Germany, and Austria (Einarsen, The nature and causes of bullying, 1999; Leymann, 1990; Zapf, Knorz, & Kulla, On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, the social work environment and health outcomes , 1996; Niedl, 1996) and bullying in the UK and US (Keashly, 1998; Pearson, Andersson, & Wegner, 2001; Fox, Spector, & Miles, 2001; Neuman & Baron, 2003).

Prior research has concentrated on bullying from various perspectives: different types of ill-treatment and hostile behavior (Einarsen, Hoel, Zapf, & Cooper, 2003; Keashly, 1998; Pearson, Andersson, & Wegner, 2001), measure of occurrences of bullying (Zapf, Einarsen, Hoel, & Vartia, 2003) , attributes of bullies and the victims they target (Zapf, 1999), organizational and social factors that enable or encourage such behavior (Zapf, 1999; Vartia, 1996), bullying arising out of interpersonal conflict (Andersson & Pearson, 1999), adverse effect on victims of bullying (Zapf, Knorz, & Kulla, 1996), process of resolving bullying or conflict situations (Richards & Daley, 2003), and bullying induced by racial/ethnic dogmas (Foxa & Stallwortha, 2004).

The above brief review of researches shows that there has been little work done to portray the psychological profile of the bully as most concentrate on the effect a bully has on the psychology of the person who is bullied or on the situations that causes bullying or the kind of ill-treatments that is inflicted by a bully.

Academic research on workplace bullying, as of now, does not help in finding the individual who can be called a bully. So we aim to demonstrate a psychological profile of a bully who can be identified when encountered in an organization.

Construct

Workplace bullying may be defined as interpersonal aggression (Neuman & Baron, 2003) which has its domain beyond straightforward incivility (Andersson & Pearson, 1999)and is characterized by its frequency of occurrence, persistence, time duration, and the prevalence of disparity of power (Einarsen, Hoel, Zapf, & Cooper, 2003).

More precisely, bullying at work means, Repeated and persistent negative actions towards one or more individual(s), which involve a perceived power imbalance and create a hostile work environment (Salin, 2003, p. 1214).

Bullying behavior is not constricted to the workplace. Bullying in schools is prevalent and has been well researched, and these studies have identified bullying as a psychological phenomenon and should not confuse with short time interpersonal conflict or aggression.

These studies believe that Bullying is long-term aggression directed toward a person who is not able to defend him/herself, leading to the victimization of that individual. (Biorkqvist, Osterman, & Hielt-Bdck, 1994, p. 175).

Further, as these studies have suggested that bullying is a stable personality trait. So a bully in one social situation tends to be one in another situation, too (Olweus, 1979). Hence, we extend our study to correlate the bullying behavior of individuals in schools to bullying at the workplace.

The purpose of my study is to investigate and understand why an individual acts aggressively in the workplace. My research will focus on the impact of the psychological aspects of the individual who is a bully at work and how it is related to their early childhood development. For example, was the bully an aggressor, or was he or she a victim in elementary school.

Hypothesis

Bullying behavior has been associated with an individuals being a bully as a child. So, in that case, the general profile that has been studied earlier as characteristics of a bully at childhood should be applicable to a bully in the workplace.

Previous research has identified that those children who had been identified as bullies showed poor psychological functioning than the individuals who were non-bullies. Bullies were identified to be aggressive, hostile, impulsive, domineering, uncooperative, and impulsive towards their peers and demonstrated anxiety and insecurity (Craig, 1998; Kumpulainen, Rasanen, Henttonen, Almqvist, Kresanov, & Linna, 1998; Veenstra, Lindenberg, Oldehinkel, Winter, & Verhulst, 2005).

Bullies feel secure when they are in control of a situation (Batsche & Knoff, 1994). Further, they lack empathy and feel satisfied and content to see the victim suffer (Bijrkqvist, Osterman, & Hielt-Bdck, 1994). This is a typical bully personality, as has been identified through researches of a child in school.

Olweus (1979) has shown that a bully in one social institution will tend to be a bully, even in another. Thus, we extend our first hypothesis that a bully in school will show bullying attitude even at work and so the bully personality profile of a child can also be extended to an adult. This leads to our first hypothesis.

Hypothesis 1

A bully in the workplace can be identified through their demonstration of the following behavior, such as aggressiveness, depression, and anxiety.

In early childhood, family, background, and parenting has a high degree of impact on bullying behavior (Veenstra, Lindenberg, Oldehinkel, Winter, & Verhulst, 2005). Previous research suggests that bullies descend from homes in which parents prefer physical disciplining. Their familial background is usually hostile and rejecting.

Their parents show poor problem-solving skills, and permit aggressive childhood behavior or even teach their children to strike back at the least provocation (Demaray & Malecki, 2003; Veenstra, Lindenberg, Oldehinkel, Winter, & Verhulst, 2005).

Thus, an individual who had strict parents and was physically disciplined had a tendency to become bullies. From this, we may derive that an individuals family background is responsible for making an individual bully at the workplace.

Hypothesis 2

An individual who had physical disciplining by parents in early childhood will have a tendency to become a bully.

Hypothesis 3

An individual becomes a bully when his/her parent permits aggressive behavior and encourages the child to strike at least provocation.

Another group of researchers believes that bullying is not caused by organizational factors, which are outcomes of incidents or situations. They believe that a bully will remain a bully irrespective of the situation, as this trait is ingrained in the personality and psychological trait of individuals (Olweus, Stability of aggressive reaction patterns in males: A review, 1979).

According to this view, a bully can be defined as an aggressive individual, lacking in empathy, who finds joy in seeing his/her victim suffering (Bijrkqvist, Osterman, & Hielt-Bdck, 1994, p. 175). This leads to our third hypothesis that could facilitate identify a bully, which is associated with the psychological nature of the tormentor and not associated with any organizational factors.

Hypothesis 4

Lack of empathy in an individual signifies the proneness of the person to bullying behavior.

Significance

Understanding the psychological profile of a bully is important to identify one. This is so because, if the tormentor is identified, it will erase the problem of harassment (Bijrkqvist, Osterman, & Hielt-Bdck, 1994). Further, if we can identify the profile of a bully correctly, it can be used to identify the prospective bully at a very early stage so that he does not cause trauma to other individuals.

This study than can be used at a very early stage of an individuals life from preventing him/her from becoming a bully.

Thus, this study will help to identify a bully from pieces of incidents of an individuals childhood and further find him as an adult. In other words, an individual who has been exposed to bullying behavior as a child or has experienced incidents that lead to bullying can be used to understand the psychological profile of a bully even as an adult.

Conclusion

Workplace bullying is a problem that is prevalent in modern offices, and their nature is different in different areas. Various researches have been done on various aspects of workplace bullying, but very few have been done to understand which the main reasons that cause workplace violence are.

This study aims to understand the underlying causes which cause workplace violence. In doing so, we identified four broad factors that affect workplace bullying attitude: organizational outcomes, perception of injustice, the psychological nature of the bullying individual, and racial or ethical dogma.

Using these factors, we would try to identify which is the strongest force in influencing a person to become a bully or if a bully is a psychological, thus ingrained in the individuals personality.

Works Cited

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat. The spiraling eVect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24 , 452471.

Batsche, G. M., & Knoff, H. M. (1994). Bullies and their victims: Understanding a pervasive problem in the schools. School Psychology Review 23 , 165174.

BBC News. (2000). Bullying at work costs millions. London, UK.

Beckford, M. (2008). Nine out of 10 say they are bullied at work. The Telegraph.

Bijrkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hielt-Bdck, M. (1994). Aggression Among University Employees. Aggressive Behavior 20 , 173-184.

Biorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hielt-Bdck, M. (1994). Aggression Among University Employees. Aggressive Behaviour 20 , 173-184.

Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences vol. 24 , 123130.

Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2003). Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims,bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. School Psychology Review, 32 , 471489.

Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying. International Journal of Manpower, 20 , 1627.

Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (2003). The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.

Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59 , 291309.

Foxa, S., & Stallwortha, L. E. (2004). Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior vol.30 , 3002-321.

Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1 , 85117.

Klein, K. E. (2008, May 7). Employers Cant Ignore Workplace Bullies. Business Week.

Kumpulainen, K., Rasanen, E., Henttonen, I., Almqvist, F., Kresanov, K., & Linna, S.-L. (1998). Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school-age children. Child Abuse & Neglect 22 , 705717.

Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and Psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5 , 119126.

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Social antecedents of bullying: A social interactionist perspective. In H. H. S. Einarsen, Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.

Niedl, K. (1996). Mobbing and well-being: Economic and personnel development implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5 , 239249.

Olweus, D. (1979). Stability of aggressive rcaction pattems in males: A review. Psychological Bulletin 86 , 852-875.

Olweus, D. (1979). Stability of aggressive rcaction pattems in males: A review. Psychological Bulletin 86 , 852-875.

Parker-Pope, T. (2008). When the Bully Sits in the Next Cubicle. The New York Times.

Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. A., & Wegner, J. A. (2001). When workers Xout convention: A preliminary study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54 , 13871420.

Richards, J., & Daley, H. (2003). Bullying policy: Development, implementation and monitoring. In H. H. S. Einarsen, Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.

Said, C. (2007). Bullying bosses could be busted. San Francisco Chronicle.

Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56 , 1213-1232.

Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullyingPsychological work environment and organizational climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5 , 203214.

Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., Winter, A. F., & Verhulst, F. C. (2005). Bullying and Victimization in Elementary Schools: A Comparison of Bullies, Victims, Bully/Victims, and Uninvolved Preadolescents. Developmental Psychology Vol. 41, No. 4 , 672682.

Zapf, D. (1999). Organizational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20 , 7085.

Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2003). Empirical Wndings on bullying in the workplace. In H. H. S. Einarsen, Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.

Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, the social work environment and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 5 , 215237.

Discrimination is one of the major challenges that organizational leaders face within the workplace. Workplace bullying refers to any acts intended to intimidate a colleague perceived by the oppressor as weak. In most cases, bullying within the workplace applies in a pattern that is directed at specific individuals. Any form of discrimination within the workplace is harmful, spiteful, and offensive to the victims. If not detected early and addressed properly, workplace bullying has the potential to derail the ability of an organization to achieve prolonged success.

It is important for employers to ensure that they provide employees with a safe and inclusive workplace environment giving everyone an equal opportunity to achieve both individual and organizational goals. Psychologists argue that bullying is often verbal or psychological in nature, thus victims tend to suffer for long due to the lack of tangible evidence (Carbo, 2017). There is an urgent need to stop workplace bullying because it affects the ability of victims to give maximum input in their work, thus lowering productivity. In addition, organizations tend to lose their competitive edge because of mistrust among employees and high turnover rates.

Prevalence of Workplace Bullying

Identifying and managing workplace bullying should be a priority for organizational leaders. Studies have shown that a significant number of people have experienced workplace bullying at one point in the places they have worked, as either a victim or a witness (Cobb, 2017).

Workplace bullying is more prevalent in workplace environments characterized by intense workloads, unclear policies to guide the behavior of employees, poor change management strategies, lack of effective communication structures, as well as employees with low levels of their job satisfaction. In terms of gender, women are more prone to being victims of workplace bullying compared to their male colleagues. Existing federal and state laws in the United States provide some of the gaps that perpetrators of workplace bullying exploit to their advantage. The laws only offer protection to workers who show evidence of physical abuse or behavior targeted to members of protected groups such as those living with disabilities.

Examples and Early Signs of Workplace Bullying

Some of the notable examples of workplace bullying include targeted practical jokes, denial of requests for days off without valid reasons, excessive performance monitoring, unjust criticism, and being misled about work responsibilities (Dean & Shepard, 2017). Studies have shown that constructive criticism, and disciplinary action related to workplace code of conduct do not qualify as bullying as long as it does not humiliate or intimidate the involved parties (Carbo, 2017).

Psychologists argue that identifying workplace bullying can be a challenge owing to its subtle nature. One of the most effective ways of achieving such a feat is considering the views and opinions of employees about things that happen within the workplace. When most of the responses indicate a certain action or behavior as being unreasonable, then it may be identified as a form of bullying (Cobb, 2017). Early signs of workplace bullying include one being ignored by colleagues, being assigned duties outside ones job description or training, a consistent pattern of personal or work-related items missing without a trace, as well as being asked to perform pointless tasks among others.

Implications of Workplace Bullying

According to psychologists, workplace bullying has several effects on the mental health of employees, which in turn affects the ability of an organization to achieve prolonged success and remain competitive due to reduced productivity (Gattis, 2018). Some of the notable psychological effects of bullying within the place of work include increased risk of suffering depression, suicidal thoughts, low self-esteem, needing time off work, and wanting to stay away from the workplace environment as much as possible (Curry, 2016). Workplaces with high prevalence of bullying tend to experience a number of negative effects that include high turnover rates, reduced commitment by employees, increased absenteeism, poor team dynamics, as well as loss of revenue necessitated by bullying investigations and legal costs.

Transformational Theory in Managing Workplace Bullying

Bullying is a widespread challenge within organizations, thus the need to understand and manage it in an effective manner. One of the guiding principles of the transformation theory is the need to promote a consistent vision and a set of values that people can apply to understanding changes in their lives. Effective management of bullying within the workplace requires transformative leadership that focuses on developing social systems that help people in managing change.

This style of leadership aims at creating valuable and constructive change that influences followers into becoming leaders (Dean & Shepard, 2017). Its practicability is evidenced by a noticeable change in an individuals behavior and attitude towards something familiar. In most cases, bullying within the workplace happens when there is inadequate monitoring across all organizational levels, thus creating room for dysfunction.

According to the transformational theory, bullying within the workplace can be identified using four parameters, namely regularity, persistence, aggression, and the power imbalance (Cobb, 2017). Regularity refers to the frequency with which a negative behavioral pattern occurs over a specified period. Persistence refers to the period within which the patterns manifest themselves, while aggression identifies and defines the notable negative acts. Power imbalance entails situations within the workplace where one employee controls or has influence over another. In instances of bullying, the person in a position of power instills fear and threatens their victims if they do not achieve their desired performance levels.

In order to achieve prolonged success, organizational leaders should comprehend that effective management of workplace bullying does not only apply using a top-down approach. This means that an employee can experience bullying from any colleague, regardless of their position within the workplace (Carbo, 2017). Bullying within the place of work applies in a downward vertical cycle, whereby a supervisor can intimidate a subordinate and vice versa. Additionally, bullying also happens between co-workers at the same level, as well as customers and organizational employees (Carbo, 2017). Understanding this cycle plays a pivotal role in handling cases of bullying because it is easy to identify the source of aggression.

Personality is one of the effective elements that can be applied in identifying victims and perpetrators of bullying. Quiet people with no peers within the workplace are easy targets for bullies. On the other hand, people who exhibit leadership and social confidence are less likely to be bullied because they are always around people (Dean & Shepard, 2017). This means that introverts who have a high degree of agreeableness are vulnerable to bullying.

On the other hand, extroverts are less likely to be bullied because they are proactive. Studies on personality traits have shown that people who repeatedly experience bullying within the workplace suffer from similar issues that include depression, insecurities, low self-esteem, and lack of confidence (Gattis, 2018). It is important for employers to engage their employees in development programs, which help in improving self-awareness.

Workplace Bullying from a Reward Theorys Perspective

The reward theory plays a pivotal role in managing bullying within the workplace. Bullying can be considered as a life-changing event because it alters the perspective and attitude of victims towards various elements related to their work. Bullying has a reward for the perpetrator and understanding ones motivation helps in establishing the source of aggression (Akella, 2020). Psychologists argue that it is necessary for organizational leaders to examine the workplace environment for any possible rewards that might be encouraging bullies.

Studies have shown that in workplaces where bullying is prevalent, there is a high likelihood that bullies have identified gaps within the corporate culture that allow them to intimidate others without fear of suffering any repercussions (Curry, 2016). While some victims of bullying have the advantage of getting psychological assistance, others tend to deal with their trauma alone and end up being depressed. Such experiences lead victims to develop a negative outlook on life, thus lowering their productivity at work. This often happens when one does not speak about his or her experiences and continue working under toxic conditions.

Eliminating Bullies from the Workplace

For maximum productivity, employees need a healthy working environment that allows one to give maximum output. Since the effects of workplace bullying are mainly psychological, creating a good communication structure makes it easy for bullies to be identified and dealt with in a professional manner (Gattis, 2018). Eliminating bullies from the workplace helps to increase cohesion among workers, thus improving the dynamics of teamwork and promoting corporate values. There is an urgent need for organizational leaders to create employee development and welfare programs, which act as their safe avenues for dealing with work-related challenges (Cobb, 2017).

In addition, the programs promote healthy competition within the workplace because co-workers will stop seeing each other as threats. Employers should involve employees in team building activities, which play a pivotal role in building cohesion and increasing awareness among individuals involved in the workplace. Workplace bullying should be highly discouraged because it has many negative effects that lead an organization to lose its competitive advantage, which can take years to regain. Organizational leaders should focus on building a healthy workplace culture characterized by constructive feedback.

Conclusion

Workplace bullying is a vice that characterizes many workplaces in the contemporary world. This form of psychological aggression aims at degrading the targeted person within the workplace. Bullies often pick out individuals whom they consider as a threat to their progression within their workplace. Some of the common causes of bullying within the workplace include negative work environments, a dysfunctional corporate culture, and lack of effective communication structures. Workplace bullying has negative effects on victims and the organization as a whole. Victims tend to lose interest in their work, become overly anxious, and some can end up depressed.

This affects the ability of an organization to be competitive because of reduced productivity within the workforce, as well as high turnover rates. Organizations also tend to lose money due to the legal fees associated with investigating reported cases of bullying within the workplace. In order to manage bullying at work, organizational leaders should make an effort to understand the psychological dynamics that form the practice and are likely to be overlooked by the organizational values and culture.

References

Akella, D. (2020). Understanding workplace bullying: An ethical and legal perspective. Springer Nature.

Carbo, J. A. (2017). Understanding, defining and eliminating workplace bullying: Assuring dignity at work. Taylor & Francis.

Cobb, E. P. (2017). Workplace bullying and harassment: New developments in international law. Taylor & Francis.

Curry, L. (2016). Beating the workplace bully: A tactical guide to taking charge. AMACOM.

Dean, P.J., & Shepard, M.D. (2017). The bully-proof workplace: Essential strategies, tips, and scripts for dealing with the office sociopath. McGraw-Hill Education.

Gattis, V.M. (2018). Bullied! : Coping with workplace bullying. Dissertation. Web.

Impact of bullying in schools

Research found that harassing harmfully affects student’s execution. (Cynthia 2014) contended that refinement in connection between scholarly execution and tormenting level contingent upon student’s scholastic accomplishment. Effect of harassing on student’s capacity to perform and accomplish scholastically was examined (Block 2014) that students who have been tormented experience dread for going to class as they feel undefended in schools. When tormenting proceeds and school dos not take activities, the whole school atmosphere and culture can be adversely influenced. This effects on students learning duty. Staff maintenance and fulfilment just as parental trust in the school can prompt:

• Learners encountering trouble in learning
• Learners hate schools
• The school building up a domain of dread and irreverence.
• Learners seeing that instructors and SMT have little control and couldn’t care less about them.
• Learners feeling uncertain.

The exploration found that casualties of harassing are frail and bashful Brank et al (2012). The attention to harassing lead to prompt poor school execution and high non-attendance. The execution of harassing injured individual crumbles in light of absence of fixation in classes.

Contra and Shumba (2013) found that school savagery influences learning in the accompanying:

• Learners end up disorganized and hard to control
• Time is lost on settling clashes as opposed to showing occurring
• High dimension of truancy
• Delinquency among students
• School animosity prompts low scholastic execution which is adjusted to the points of the school.
• Disrespect to educators and non-accommodation of formal assignments and homework

School drop out

Dropping out of school has grown to be an endemic Mamma (2018) confirms that 1 out of 10 rookies that drop out of school dropped out because they were bullied. They experience dangerous and determine no longer to move to high school. Some sense unaccepted for who they may be inside the region wherein they’re presupposed to be secure and guarded. This is a hassle due to the fact these newbies unfastened out the opportunity to improve their training and pass in all likelihood makes a extra a success lifestyles. Mamma, Z (2018) confirms that many beginners drop out each year most of them fail to graduate from excessive school on time.

EFFECTS ON TEACHING

Educators sense or perceived the following as an effect of faculty violence on teaching Swart et al (2013). No effective coaching can take location in a risky environment whereby inexperienced persons are uncontrollable, ill-discipline and unmanageable. Educators turn out to be demotivated; they discover it tough to complete the syllabus because of poor attendance, rookies banking instructions. Shortage of LTSM because of theft, surroundings isn’t conducive for teaching and studying because of vandalism. Swart et al (2013) has the same opinion that coaching is affected due to the fact educators feel helpless, demoralised and disenchanted. School violence is due to a lack of appreciate for the elderly and education officials due to unexpected behaviours of the rookies.Vusumuzi Ncontsa (2013). This suggests that faculty violence has various outcomes on teaching and mastering in our colleges.

Teacher tips to prevent bullying

• Know your school and District Policies on bullying and implement the policy effectively.
• Treat the learners and others with warmth and respect- the teacher should be able to help learners.
• Discuss bullying with colleagues- take steps to monitor bullying to create conducive atmosphere in the school environment.
• Conduct classroom activities around bullying-assist your class to pinpoint bullying books TV shows and be able to interpret bullying activities.
• Take immediate action – take urgent prevention measures to curb bullying

Cynthia (2014) dissected harassing sway on student’s general execution. It might be a fast timespan or long time. She likewise examinations contrasts in connection between tormenting degree and scholastic execution depending on student’s instructive satisfaction. Naline (2014) also examined tormenting impact to scholastically advancement. Nadine found that harassed unpracticed people have a feeling of stress on the instructive achievement. Mundbherg et al, (2014) broke down the association among harassing and grade school in Denmark. They respected that tormented amateurs have a lower instructional accomplishment and harassing impacts are high and more prominent outrageous particularly in evaluation nine.

Placidius (2013) dissected that real harassing is noticeable as the most extreme overwhelming tormenting subtlety. Young men support to be menaces more than women. The most extreme impact of tormenting is horrendous scholarly execution. Mehta et al (2013) found that harassing impact apprentices, they experience hazardous at school. There is less commitment on school sports; they avoid going to personnel guidelines for the reason for turning away exploitation. Encounters of exploitation can cause poor instructive execution and furthermore lead to non-attendance. Harassing can impacts student’s instructional accomplishments in both immediate and backhanded techniques. Sharia et al (2015) reasoned that harassing badly affects scholarly satisfaction the two sufferers and the domineering jerks.

Motshega (2016) contends that tormenting terrifically affects leaners execution especially while seeking on the execution of number-crunching, she also expressed that she recognized that the inordinate dimension of harassing in South Africa brought about the awful impact at the general execution of arithmetic and innovative skill take a gander at (LTMSS) have been propelled. Motshega (2018) supported that from 2003 to 2018, SA improved by 87% math and ninety% for mechanical expertise articulated through HSRC. Motshega (2016) express more prominent circumstance around tormenting and affirms that this harassing had an impact in every unfortunate casualty and culprits while that is associated with educational execution because of low dimensions of tormenting low evaluations improve in scholarly execution while it is as contrasted and senior evaluations/portion.

Branks et al (2012) stipulated that of harassing have experienced the negative by and large execution in instructive satisfaction because of truancy. These green beans are constantly powerless, timid and exasperating. Ammermeuller (2012) showed that being harassed has strikingly with horrendous effect on blessing and fate understudy’s general execution in staff. Sharia et al (2015) screen that harassing is appeared to have an extreme inconvenience in the instructive settings and in all components of the area. They found that harassing negatively affects instructive and inferred that females are more prominent influenced than guys by means of tormenting. Harassing comprise an unreasonable issue in beginners lives. This inconvenience influences all apprentices in the two unfortunate casualties and menaces. Alison (2016) concurred that harassing has been analysed as a worldwide inconvenience that influences passionate, social, and substantial appropriately being of new kids on the block around the world.

Conclusion

The greater part of research and consideration on tormenting has been on harassing, where students are the person in question. In spite of the fact that there is a constrained research in examining educators as the casualties of tormenting by students in schools. Student to-educator harassing is a zone of universal concern Garrett (2014). This examination advocates the significance of tending to student to-educator harassing, uneasiness and despondency among instructors, and the connection between the diverse job players. The ramifications of the investigation are that mediations need to happen in two territories and on two dimensions. Right off the bat, intercessions should go for tending to student to-educator tormenting. A beginning stage could be the advancement of hostile to tormenting strategy. Also, emotional well-being administrations should be made accessible to instructors who experience large amounts of psychological well-being challenges. In any case, so as to have a noteworthy effect, the execution and support of mediations needs to happen on a neighbourhood level at individual schools, just as on a national and even global dimension. In mix these medications can offer people who endure because of a harasser the chance to shape their future and modify themselves from what they have endured before.

Recommendation

It is profoundly praised that:

• The area of school organization urged routinely to class heads to screen harassing rates and distinguish powerless students by some kind of study.
• The area school organization urged consistently to class heads to screen tormenting rates and distinguish helpless students by some kind of study questions.
• Teacher ought to stay in contact through parent instructor meeting with student’s parent’s gatekeepers and screen student’s kinship examples and test why certain students don’t have or seen not to have no less than one companion, may experience the ill effects of being tormented.
• All schools ought to be urged to build up a few sorts of friend emotionally supportive networks, potentially with the assistance of educator guardians or school clinicians and different experts.
• Authorities ought to build up an arrangement of normal checking with the goal that they can discover the explanations behind regular nonattendance of students from school.