Category: Birth Control

One of the most discussed viewpoints today is whether to control birth or let nature follow all the way through. Prior to the twentieth century, sex was a delicate issue, and it was held for individuals in marriage. This was the point at which the individuals from the general public respected good practices and restraint was one of the fundamental beliefs. Contraception was profoundly censured as the ethics of the general public would avoid negative issues, for example, fetus removal albeit an absence of conception prevention let to a high populace which was perilous for the restricted assets. In the late twentieth century, the social orders had lost ethics and individuals occupied with sex in any case prompting impromptu pregnancies and premature births that put the lives of the ladies in danger. To counteract such hazard practices and to control the raised populace, nations started sanctioning anti-conception medication, and today pretty much every nation has received contraception. While a few people still dissent anti-conception medication, it is a smart thought as it causes ladies to improve their wellbeing, control populace and lessen joblessness and destitution in the cutting edge social orders.

Conception prevention encourages ladies to avert pregnancy until when the body has recuperated from the past birth and imagine again when healthy. Without anti-conception medication, ladies would get pregnant at short interims prompting crumbled wellbeing, enthusiastic and mental unsettling influences which antagonistically influence their wellbeing condition. Some would fall back on premature births when they get impromptu pregnancy, putting their lives in danger and furthermore gambling fruitlessness. Subsequently, anti-conception medication enables ladies to maintain a strategic distance from such situations that put their wellbeing in danger.

Additionally, anti-conception medication has significantly helped in controlling the detonating human populace and contributes towards quiet countries. On the off chance that it were not for conception prevention, the populace would have gained out of power. The outcomes of overpopulation are clear. The high populace would expand the scramble for constrained assets which would prompt emergency and inevitably flash a war among the individuals. There have been occurrences where pastoralists in creating nations battle about the field, what about if the individuals were vieing for a rare asset? Individuals would battle about the rare assets prompting weakness and threatening world to live in. In this manner, conception prevention is significant in controlling overpopulation and anticipating its issues.

Likewise, anti-conception medication is essential since it counteracts joblessness and destitution. Uncontrolled and visit pregnancies deny the two life partners time to fill in as they nurture the youngsters. This lessens their working days in a year bringing down efficiency. Aside, the successive births will add to numerous kids relying upon the less profitable guardians. This outcomes in high neediness levels. Anti-conception medication would help in controlling pregnancies and enabling the two guardians to possess energy for work. Hence, conception prevention makes time for occupation chasing and diminishes neediness as the guardians acquire wages.

Then again, adversaries would contend that anti-conception medication meddles with nature and avoids the origination of increasingly helpful individuals to God’s creation. In any case, this contention ought not be invited since it doesn’t think about the threat of overpopulation as identified previously. Another counter contention would be that anti-conception medication estimates lead to wellbeing dangers, for example, hypertension and weight gain. Be that as it may, anti-conception medication strategies, for example, the utilization of condoms and vasectomy don’t represent any dangers. Moreover, conception prevention strategies have been improved to avoid symptoms. Consequently, anti-conception medication stands apart gainful to mankind.

In this manner, anti-conception medication is gainful to man as it helps in improving ladies wellbeing status, controlling overpopulation to forestall negative issues, for example, violations and war and limiting joblessness and neediness. Conception prevention limits populace development and diminishes scramble for couple of assets. It additionally causes ladies to design pregnancies and possess energy for work consequently diminishing various non-working ladies and lessens neediness levels. It has counteracted a circumstance whereby ladies would have youngsters habitually as though birth machines and permitted them an opportunity to recuperate their wellbeing from past births. In a perfect world, conception prevention is fundamental for the world countries.

Introduction

Young pregnancies and adolescent parenthood are a reason for concern around the world. From a historic perspective, young pregnancies are the same old thing. For a lot of mankind’s history, it was totally basic that young girls were wedded during their late puberty and experienced first birth during their second decade of life. This sort of reproductive behavior was socially wanted and considered as expected. These days, in any case, the counteractive action of high school pregnancies and young parenthood is a need for public health in almost all created and progressively in developing nations. For quite a while, young pregnancies were related to serious medical problems. As indicated by the World Health Organization (WHO), around 16 million young ladies maturing somewhere in the range of 15 and 19 years and around one million teen girls younger than 15 years conceive offspring consistently. These days, by far most of the adolescent pregnancies happen in low-and-middle pay nations because of poor health services; in this manner, inconveniences during pregnancy, birth, and baby blues stage (e.g., 42 days after birth) are the second reason for death among young ladies maturing somewhere in the range of 15 and 19 years around the world. Moreover, it is evaluated that approximately 3,000,000 young ladies experience unsafe abortions, which may bring about sequential conceptive issues or even death. The United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) revealed that worldwide each fifth kid is conceived by a juvenile mother and 80% of these adolescent pregnancies happen in underdeveloped nations. Adolescent pregnancies, in any case, still additionally happen in high-salary nations and despite much better medical care young pregnancies are likewise considered as hazardous and strategy attempts to stay away from too earlier parenthood. This is not just because of medical issues, however above all else the social outcomes of adolescent parenthood. Therefore, the topic of teenage pregnancy is needing much research and concern on the analysis of causes and consequences (Kirchengast, 2016).

Background

According to Cheery and Dillon, immature pregnancy is an unpredictable issue with numerous purposes behind concern. Teenage pregnancy is a characteristic human event that is a poor fit with present-day society. From various perspectives, it has become an intermediary in what could be known as the culture wars. On one philosophical side of the discussion, political and religious leaders utilize social and good standards to shape the popular feeling and advance an open approach with the expressed motivation behind preventing teenage pregnancy. Young pregnancy is a serious social issue as a number of teen pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes is a supportive claim of teenage pregnancy. The opposite side of this discussion introduced in productions by bunches like the World Health Organization (World Health Organization 2004) mirrors the restorative experts, general wellbeing experts, and academicians who present a defense for review high school sexuality and pregnancy as far as human advancement, wellbeing, and mental needs. These two unique perspectives on high schooler pregnancy are spoken to in the United States by gatherings, for example, Children’s Aid Society; Healthy Teen Network; Center for Population Options; Advocates for Youth; National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy; National Organization on Adolescent Pregnancy, Parenting (Cherry and Dillon, 2016).

In spite of adolescent pregnancy rates have declined impressively in the course of recent decades in the United States and in the greater part of the other 20 nations with complete insights, the youngster pregnancy rate is as yet most elevated in the United States (57 for every 1,000 15–19-year-olds), trailed by New Zealand (51) and England and Wales (47). The most reduced rate was in Switzerland (8 for every 1,000), trailed by the Netherlands (14), Slovenia (14), and Singapore (14). Rates were higher than the most noteworthy rates referenced above in some previous Soviet nations with fragmented measurements and in creating nations in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America for which assessments could be made (2016).

Countries with incomplete statistics

For countries with incomplete abortion statistics, pregnancy rates and the proportions of pregnancies that end in abortion presented here are lower than the true values because the numbers of abortions are undercounted. Such estimates are nevertheless useful because they indicate the minimum levels of both measures in these countries. For a few countries lacking official abortion reports with enough coverage, they used abortion estimates from alternate sources. For the United States, combined estimates of abortion incidence based on a 2010 census of abortion providers with information on the age distribution of abortions compiled annually by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Because the census is deemed to include more than 90% of abortions, the resulting estimates for the United States are classified as complete. For nations with insufficient abortions measurements, pregnancy rates and the extents of pregnancies that end in abortion displayed here are lower than the true qualities because the number of abortions is undercounted. Such gauges are all things considered helpful since they show the base degrees of the two measures in these nations. For a couple of nations lacking authority fetus removal reports with adequate inclusion, we utilized premature birth gauges from interchange sources.

Solid national assessments of the age-explicit rate of premature birth are accessible for only five nations with prohibitive laws, all in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America: Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, and Mexico. These abortion surveys are imitative from nation studies. Abortion assesses in these nations incorporate both legitimate and illegal abortions.

Miscarriages

The rate of unsuccessful labor was evaluated based on clinical investigations of pregnancy misfortune by gestational age, which show that perceived premature deliveries at least five weeks of development are equivalent to around 20% of births in addition to 10% of actuated abortions. Discoveries from some overviews of women in the United States support these model-based appraisals.

Juvenile pregnancy, birth, and premature birth rates are the number of events per 1,000 females 15–19 years of age. The rates for youthful teenagers are determined as the number of events per 1,000 females 10–14 years of age. Rates among youthful young people would probably be higher if they could be registered for 13-to 14-year olds, to whom most of these occasions likely happen, however, the population approximately for this 2-year age bunch are not accessible for some nations. For all pregnancies, the juvenile’s age is estimated at the time of the pregnancy result. Certainty interims are not exhibited since indispensable insights on live births and populaces are not viewed as appraisals with vulnerability, however obvious populace esteems (See Appendix A).

Age-specific pregnancy rates for narrower age groups would serve to more precisely identify those teens with high pregnancy rates. For example, in the United States and the United Kingdom, the pregnancy rate is higher among 18- to 19-year olds than among 15- to 17-year olds. Patterns are not constantly monotonic. In Canada, a progressively nitty gritty survey of information showed that the youngster pregnancy rate leveled off in 2006 after a time of decline; in Sweden, the rate appears to have balanced out since around 2002, following 10 years in length upward pattern; and in the United States, the pace of decline has been expanding.

As anyone might expect, juvenile pregnancy and birth rates are higher in Mexico and the nations in Sub-Saharan Africa than in different nations in this audit. In these districts, where standards regularly incorporate early age at marriage and ambitious start of childbearing, a bigger extent of pregnancies to teenagers is probably going to be proposed than in created nations. For instance, in Sub-Saharan Africa all in all, just about 35% of pregnancies to 15-to 19-year olds in 2007 were unintended. The arranging status of pregnancies to teenagers is not methodically gathered crosswise over created nations, however, in the United States, it is assessed that 82% of pregnancies to adolescents are unintended.

Studies have more oftentimes inspected the relationship among social, financial, and social components and contrast in youngster pregnancy rates inside nations. In the United Kingdom and the United States, for instance, youngster pregnancy rates are higher in the most financially burdened gatherings. In the United States, the pregnancy rate is 100 among dark youngsters and 38 among white teenagers, although this differential has diminished with time. Subjective research in the United Kingdom focuses on poor material conditions, misery at home or at school, and low desires for the future as elements related to high adolescent pregnancy rates.

At the opposite finish of the range, the low adolescent pregnancy rate in Switzerland exists with regards to since quite a while ago settled sex education programs, boundless desire that sexually active teenagers will utilize contraception, free family arranging administrations, and ease crisis contraception. Be that as it may, even in Switzerland, insights show that high schooler pregnancy rates differ with levels of education and the social foundation of juvenile young women.

Teenager birth rates are high in numerous Eastern Europe and Central Asian nations. These high rates have been ascribed to various obstructions to access to contraception. In some previous Soviet nations, females under 18 years of age can not get to sexual and reproductive health services without a parent’s assent. Other obstructions noted in situational investigations incorporate the significant expense of provisions, prescription requirements for certain techniques, constrained quantities of outlets from which to acquire contraceptives supplies, absence of sex education programs, and social standards that point of confinement the utilization of contraception.

They found that the extent of teenager pregnancies that end in abortion shifts generally crosswise over nations with liberal abortion laws. The reverse relationship between the pregnancy rate and the extent of pregnancies that end in abortion may reflect that a more prominent extent of pregnancies are arranged where rates are high (Sedgh, Finer, Bankole, Eilers, & Singh, 2015).

Birth control, also known as contraception, is ‘is any method, medicine, or device used to prevent pregnancy.’ (WomensHealth. 2015) As there are conflicting views regarding our moral obligation to allow birth control it is related to ethics. As ethics falls under one of the six main branches of philosophy, the questioning of the ethical justifiability of the use of birth control can be labelled a philosophical issue.

In order to draw a conclusion as to whether or not the use of contraceptive methods is ethically justifiable, multiple views need to be discussed and considered, including positions such as Christian ethics, Consequentialism and Kantian ethics. In order to come to the conclusion that birth control can be considered as ethically justifiable, the arguments must prove to overthrow any opposing views.

In the discussion of each of these positions, arguments will be explored to discuss the strength each. An argument is a connected series of statements used to establish a definite conclusion. It is important that all information is accurate and justifiable, to develop a valid and sound argument. Using a range of argumentative devices, the strength of each argument will be analysed to lead to an educated and justifiable conclusion as to whether or not birth control can be considered as ethically justifiable.

Within Catholic teachings, natural law arguments are commonly used to condemn unnatural, and therefor immoral acts, such as birth control. It follows that, ‘The Bible is the inspired, error-free, and revealed word of God.’ (J. Kohlhaas, 2018), thus, as birth control conflicts with the path of conception, it goes against the natural order god and is not ethically justifiable. The natural order was appropriated through the premise that as God was our creator, we must respect his will, and not go against the natural order. Christianity claims that any birth control is ‘unnatural’, as it is a distortion of our nature and does not align with the will of God. Therefore, an argument following Christian views and the natural order would align with the following;

P1: it is wrong to interfere with the natural order of the universe

P2: Birth control interferes with the natural order of the universe

C: Therefore, birth control is wrong

This argument follows a deductive format, with the premises working together to prove the conclusion (P, Q, -Q therefore –P) in the valid form of a Modus Tollens. The empirical nature of the arguments alludes the possibility of the arguments being proven true, although as the premises are based on religious view that have not yet been proven, the conclusion cannot be solidified. Thus, the Christian view is strong, as when the premises are presumed to be true, the conclusion must be too although it is not cogent as there is no proof that it is wrong to interfere with the natural order of the universe.

The Catholic Church implements teachings that any form of abortion (including preventatives such as birth control) go against the basic principal that ‘human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception’ (Kohlhaas, J 2018) and opposes anything with the purpose to destroy or prevent the birth of a baby. The belief of the Catholic Church follows the previous argument surrounding the natural law, and ultimately agree that birth control cannot be ethically justified. From this, the Church has upheld the position that every measure taken in the hopes to prevent a pregnancy is a moral evil, a belief that the catholic church declares ‘has not changed and remains unchangeable’ (Kohlhaas, J 2018). Thus the Christian Church agrees that under Christian ethics, birth control would be proven ethically unjustifiable.

Utilitarians follow a moral system, the Greatest Happiness Principle, that each person should aim to ‘maximise happiness and minimise pain for both the individual and sum of individuals in a community’ (Jones, G, Cardinal, D & Hayward, J 2006), in all decisions. Under the belief of John S. Mill, ‘the plains and pleasures of each individual are to be take equally; no one should hold higher importance, although happiness can be measures to different extents’ (Jones, G, Cardinal, D & Hayward, J 2006). Someone, such as Mill, who holds a Utilitarian view, would say that in order to bring about the most happiness, birth control is necessary. Its exclusion would inherently lead to an increase in population, resulting in a decrease in available recourses and ultimately an escalation of poverty rates. Additionally, some forms of birth control can be used to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted infections and diseases, alleviating further possible sources of pain. Therefore, the use of birth control would ultimately maximise happiness for the larger majority in the future. Under the Utilitarian view, in order to establish greatest happiness, pain must be absent, and if birth control can fight pain, then its usage can be ethically justified.

P1: Pain must be alleviated when establishing the greatest happiness

P2: Birth control can alleviate pain

C: Birth control works to establish the greatest happiness

The strong deductive argument surrounding Utilitarianism proves that using birth control is ethically justifiable as it works to eliminate pain, thus increasing happiness in the wider population. Each premise is sound and can be proven true, in order to prove the conclusion in the valid form of modus ponens, proving its cogency.

John S Mill believes that ‘experience is the only true foundation of knowledge’ (Cambridge University Press 2015), and thus philosophy ‘allows no place for traditional or received ideas of right and wrong’ (Schenker, J 201). Without his beliefs against religion, Mill focuses on the ethical rights and wrongs of using contraception and ultimately works to agree with the conclusion that happiness is pleasure in the absence of pain. As contraception works to allow those to experience pleasure, however minimal the extent may be, whilst increasing protection against any possible pain, Mill ultimately believes that birth control is ethically justifiable, following the Utilitarian view.

The categorical imperative says that ‘an object, rationally necessary and unconditional principle that we must always follow despite any natural desires or inclinations we may have to the contrary.’ (Johnson, R & Cureton, A 2019). It acts on all people, regardless on their interests or beliefs. Similarly, Immanuel Kant’s principle of universalizability maintains that, ‘Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law’ (Johnson, R & Cureton, A 2019) and that we should act in a way that we expect others to. Following this principle, if your maxim followed Agape, that you were to only act in a way that brings about the most love, a valid argument would follow the pattern of;

P3: Making an educated decision surrounding when children can be effectively cared for is more loving.

P4: Using birth control allows parents to make an educated decision surrounding when children can be effectively cared for.

C: Using birth control brings the most love.

This argument is strong as it follows the valid form of modus ponens. It is made up of empirical statements that can be inferred true to form a sound and true conclusion. Due to this, it is cogent and proves the belief of those following Agape.

As it is more loving to the wider majority to limit the number of children, thus increase the resources and providing for the children, birth control can be ethically justified. Continuing, a lack of birth control can lead to the spread of health issues and unwanted pregnancies. Agape ‘demands love for those unwanted babies, and for the children born with health conditions’ (The University of Chicago Press Journal 2019) and contraception is a small price to pay when put into a comparison with the amount of recourses needed to care for children’s needs.

Immanuel Kant had the belief that, ‘it is not requisite for human beings who marry to make their end’ (Sandel, M 2010) and ‘enjoyment in the reciprocal use of the sexual endowments is an end of marriage’ (Sandel, M 2010). As a resultant, following the maxim of Agape, it would be possible to universalise principals of family planning, allowing couples to make an educated decision as to when they would be able to provide for children, ultimately making the most loving choice protecting the wider majority.

Thus, when following the position of Kantian Ethics following the maxim of Agape, it is ethically justifiable to use birth control as it is proven to be the most loving option.

Ultimately, I believe that if birth control ‘results in every child being a wanted child, and in better, healthier lives for women,’ (Johnson, R & Cureton, A 2019), along with reducing extreme poverty, it must be ethically justifiable. It brings the most happiness and the least pain, following the utilitarian view, and is the most loving option following Kantian ethics.

The catholic view is based solely on religious premises. As there is no evidentiary support to back up these premises, the accuracy of the conclusion cannot be deduced and the argument only holds sound to those with catholic beliefs. Additionally, human beings inherently interfere with the natural order of the universe commonly, such as when doctors treat a patient with an illness, in order to satisfy the happiness of the most amount of people, as the most loving action. Thus, the view of the catholic church is flawed and the argument cannot stand true in the case that the natural order is being broken to increase happiness currently. Consequently, if humans are not allowed a choice as to whether to have children, their freedom and control over both their bodies and lives are fundamentally restricted.

There is no way to eliminate all interferences with the natural order, thus we must focus on the nature of the interference and the benefits it may bring. Since humanity interferes with the natural order of the universe all the time, what matters is whether the consequences of that interference are good or bad.

Therefore, due to the points raised, I believe that birth control is ethically justifiable. The catholic position is inherently flawed and limited to a small number of people, and the natural order is currently being broken in the hopes to bring about more happiness. On the other hand, both the Utilitarian and Kantian Ethic positions agree that as birth control brings the most happiness and the least pain, and is the most loving option, it must be ethically justifiable.

Birth control is to prevent birth, right? If teens were placed on birth control without their parents’ consent that will give them the mindset to feel like they are grown. When they feel like they are grown then they will chose to do anything as they please. They would become very secretive to their parents. They could be engaging in sexual activities and their parents would not be informed until they turn eighteen. Teens should have their parents’ consent in order to be placed on birth control.

Parents would begin to lose control over their teens and question themselves on their own parenting skills. Once you placed your teen on birth control they are no longer the same. Their attitudes begin to change, different peers, different mindsets and personalities, and even step outside of their comfort zone.

Parents should be aware of all the activities of their children. It is best for a mother to know her own teen. The mother will then be able to console her teen about the positive and the negative effects of having birth control. Some teens find it embarrassing to talk to their parents about this issue.

Parents should take their teens to the clinic to get the birth control just in case they are informed by the doctor of an unfamiliar thing that they are not aware of. In an article entitled New Studies Signal Dangers of Limiting Teen Access to Birth Control, is states “roughly one in five teenagers would have unsafe sex if their parents had to be notified when they got birth control at a family planning clinic.” In other words, parents were not aware that their children were sexually active and by them not informing their parents they could have an STD and were too afraid to confess to their parents. The teen could have easily died because she had a disease and there was nothing they could have done at the last minute.

In the second article it states how a teacher in Washington takes their twelve years of age student to the clinic to get birth control. The two saddest and awkward thing about the situation the mother doesn’t know what’s going on and he contiunlsey rape this innocnet child. He placed on birth control himself so she wouldn’t end up pregnant and he most definitely wouldn’t have gotten caught for his wrong doings. The clinic are allowed to not alert the child’s mother. By the child being so young she is afraid to speak up . Having a relationship with her daughter plays a major role at this point. Let her know there is no reason to be afraid to speak and say how she feels.

Before considering the decision have a TALK with your teen. T stands for talk. Talk to them about the cause and effect of birth control. A stands for aware. Be aware of their actions. L stands for listen. Listen and understand their point of view of why or why they shouldn’t be placed on birth control. K stands for kindly. Kindly and in a respectable way come to a decision that is reasonable and suitable to you as a parent. This will allow the teen to understand where you are coming from and important is it that you keep a check on her and now that her safety is the most important thing to you.

Work Cited

1. “New Studies Signal Dangers of Limiting Teen Access to Birth Control Information and Services.” Guttmacher Institute, 17 June 2013, https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2005/new-studies-signal-dangers-limiting-teen-access-birth-control-information-and.
2. Brady, Kevin, and Jan Schakowsky. “Symposium.” Insight on the News, vol. 18, no. 39, Oct. 2002, p. 46. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?

The reason behind to insert Article 47A in the Constitution of India is: The population of India is increasing at a very high rate. Currently, India is the second-largest populated country in the world. As per the statistics of Worldometer Elaboration of the latest United Nations. The recent population of India is 139.27 crores. There is an urgent need to control the population of India otherwise there will be a mass disaster. This increasing of the population is the root of almost every major problem exists in India such as poverty, unemployment, pollution, malnutrition, overuse of resources, corruption etc. So to get rid of all the major issues population must be controlled at any cost.

Benefits of population control

1. Good quality education

If the population will control then each and every child will get a good quality of education. As when there are more than two children in the family then due to poor financial condition it is very difficult for all the children of the family to get a good education.

2. Unemployment reduces

If the population will be in a controlled situation then the rates of unemployment get reduce and every family’s children will get good job opportunities.

3. Overexploitation of resources will reduce

If the population will be in a controlled situation then over utilisation of resources will reduce as when the population will be less than fewer resources will be used which results in better utilisation of resources.

4. Poverty will reduce

If the population will be in a controlled situation then unemployment will get reduce which results in reducing the poverty. And when the population gets in control then the government will put more efficient efforts in the upliftment of the people who have below poverty line ( BPL)status.

5. Pollution will reduce

If the population will be in a controlled situation then the pollution rate will reduce as the use of transport will reduce, water pollution will reduce, noise pollution will reduce also if the human population will be controlled then the emission of carbon will also, reduce which results in a reduction of global warming.

6. Crime Rate will reduce

When the population get in the controlled situation then unemployment will reduce and poverty will also reduce which results in a decrease in the crime rate. As per the observation mostly crimes are committed by the unemployed people or the peoples who is suffering from poverty.

Conclusion

For the better future of India, this measure to control the population is taken. Population Control will solve many major problems of India which will take India’s development on a higher level and makes India more advance.

Anti-conception medication pills are the second most generally used strategy for contraception in the United States. The Pill is as of now accessible by prescription only, and a debate has developed about whether birth control pills should be accessible over the counter. Requiring a prescription for the pill is a boundary for many women, including those without access to a medicinal services supplier, transportation, child care, or insurance. Birth control pills have many benefits and should be made available over the counter.

If birth control were to be available over the counter there would be a lower rate of unwanted pregnancies, which would in turn extremely benefit society. For instance, if this were to happen, it would lower taxes. In fact, unintended pregnancies cost the US federal and state governments $21 billion in 2010, with the average cost-per-birth being $12,770 for prenatal care, labor and delivery, postpartum care, and 12 months of infant care ($20,716 for 60 months) (“Pros”). Making birth control available over the counter would also lower teen pregnancies. This is a result of teenagers being more likely to utilize over the counter birth control since taking the pill is an every day routine and isn’t attached to the emotional weight of sex. According to Rebecca Hersher, between 2007 and 2013, the number of 15 to 19-year-olds giving birth dropped 36 percent due to teenagers using contraceptives more often. This movement would furthermore lower abortion rates. To illustrate, in a survey of women seeking abortions, 72% said they were pregnant because they could not get the contraception they needed, and 32% reported an institutional reason such as the prescription requirement (“Pros”).

In addition, birth control is safe, convenient, and has been proven to have long-term health benefits. Of course the pill carries no risk of overdose or addiction. Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences at Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health explains that pregnancy has a mortality rate about the same as car accidents, one in 8,300, while the risk of dying from birth control is about one in 1,667,000, about the same as dying from being struck by lightning (“Pros”). Nevertheless, symptoms aren’t always a bad thing, and anti-conception medication pills aren’t only for birth control. Both combination and progestin-only pills diminish menstrual cramps, lighten periods, and lower the risk of ectopic pregnancy. Birth control pills can also help prevent or decrease acne, bone thinning, cysts in your breasts and ovaries, endometrial and ovarian cancers, iron deficiency, PMS (premenstrual syndrome), and severe infections in your ovaries, fallopian tubes, and uterus (“What”).

To conclude, over the counter birth control would lower unwanted pregnancies, which would in turn lower taxes, teen pregnancy, and the abortion rate. Not only is birth control safe, but it has also proven to have long term health benefits. Given these points, it is apparent that making birth control an over the counter medication is the right decision.

Works cited:

1. “Pros & Cons – ProCon.org.” OTC Birth Control Pills, 14 Nov. 2018, birth-control.procon.org/.
2. “What Are the Benefits & Advantages of Birth Control Pills?” Planned Parenthood, www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/birth-control-pill/what-are-the-benefits-of-the-birth-control-pill.

One of many wrangling decisions nowadays is weather to provide birth control or let nature take its course. Studies show that “ 18 precent of teenage girls (age 13-18), or almost 1 in 5, are on birth control”(Kramer). There are many methods to prevent pregnancy. For example, abstinence is number one along with being the healthiest. The first form of birth control became available in the 1960s. Since the contraceptive pill became present, methods have advanced and increased into more convenient ways for people to control pregnancy. Now, birth control doesn’t just regulate birth prevention, it regulates hormones throughout the body. For a handful of years, birth control has been a sensitive topic, many believe that sex is supposed to be restrained until marriage but according to research; “ By age 44, 99% of respondents have had sex, and 95% had done so before marriage”(Wind), and in similar terms, “One out of every three teen girls will become pregnant at least once before the age of 20(Familyplanningplus.org). Many forms of birth control were invented for this exact dilemma and contraceptives make the best option for several reasons.

Once the age of 16 is reached, this becomes the time where they are faced with relationships that may start their physical connections and along with that, “Age 16 tends to be the common age to start birth control”(Kramer). High school students are likely to have their first boyfriend within the four years they’re there; with peer pressure surrounding them there’s no guarantee a teenager will restrain from sex and the chances they won’t run into that is very low. It is true that teenagers need to be protected from pregnancy the most and with that said, ”62 percent of sexually active male high school students reported that they or their partner used a condom at their most recent sexual intercourse”(childtrends.org). That could mean 38% of teens aren’t using a form of birth control or they are enduring other methods. Some people may think any form of birth control besides abstinence is expensive but a very common method is condoms. Condoms are inexpensive and are easy to access in almost every store. Meanwhile, Birth rates have dropped and that’s not because of a decrease in teenage sexual activity; it seems to be that more teens are getting a handle on condoms and contraceptives. Teen pregnancy was at an all-time high before medicine got involved, and the Office of Adolescent Health notes that “Since 1991, the rates of teen pregnancy have dropped by half. In 2013, the CDC reported that birth rates for U.S. teens 15-19 years old dropped to a record low not seen since 1946”(cdc.gov). When birth control became available a decrease in teen pregnancy was greatly reduced. By 1991 several options of birth control were available and became beneficial to teens and women to ensure that they’re protected and not at risk of beginning pregnancy for several reasons.

Many think there is one reason for deciding to be on birth control. It’s obvious the first reason people would infer, but birth control includes way more than that. The contraceptive pill regulates menstrual cycles as well as banishes hormonal acne. It’s no secret that menstrual cycles tag along with painful cramps and by reducing ovulation, that comes with the decrease of pain that accompanies with the cycle in addition, Healthline for acne included “The hormones in combination birth control pills can help reduce acne. The pills decrease the circulation of androgens, which decreases the production of sebum.

The pills must contain both estrogen and progestin to be effective against acne”(healthline.com). This comes to show that birth control isn’t just a free card for people to have sex, it’s a benefit to the body and reduces woman from buying methods to get rid of acne that end up not working due to their hormones. With that said, there are women who only use the contraceptive pill for everything besides pregnancy prevention. While the majority of women use birth control for birth regulation, “14% of pill users take it only for other reasons”(SITE). Any woman could go to the dermatologist and get one single pill that controls their hormonal acne but the birth control pill has several all in one. Lastly, there are 6 types of birth control for your specific needs. There is the combination pill, the mini-pill, extended cycle pill, low dose pills and monophasic pills. All can include different purposes to give people an option to what they prefer.

Last but not least, women after giving birth start-up on birth control as well. Women after childbirth want time to recover after the birth of their child. Not only do they need time but their bodies need time to recover. Unplanned pregnancy leaves a woman with limited time to recover from her most recent childbirth. This could end up with many complications for her and the baby including anemia as one. This could lead to emotional issues due to the amount of stress of another baby on the way which affects them both as well. “many are driven to seek cheap and dangerous abortions”(SITE). Women are so desperate to solve the problem with an abortion they will do it at any cost. This is exactly why birth control gives women with the option and allows them to make choices for when their ready next.

On the other side of the spectrum, opponents would argue that birth control interferes with nature and messes with conception for later on in life However, people agree this conflicts with God’s creation. This argument should not be welcomed since we are in a different era where we can’t have kids at 20 or younger. Having kids after high school is not accepted anymore, tats not the American way as teens who become pregnant are a disgrace in people’s eyes. Another counterargument is that birth control leads to health risks and weight gain. However “birth control such as condoms do not play any risks”(SITE). This Is true because they protect you without adjusting your body and messing with your hormones. Furthering birth control methods have been improved to prevent effects. hence, this birth control stands beneficial for humankind.”47% do not approve of birth control”(SITE), and this has a lot to do with religion and morals.

Birth control is effective in many ways, although there are groups and people who would rather have nature take its course, this contraceptive benefits millions of teens all over the world. Researchers/scientists are starting to make every method more affordable for underage teenagers to get a handle on any option to protect themselves from reproduction. The pill is one of the most effective reversible methods and all of the methods are 99% effective when used.

Birth control is so widely, available and accepted, that the thought of it becoming legal and widely, available only starting in the 1960s for the United States is shocking. Much of the birth control movement was lead and pushed by Margaret Sanger. Sanger was originally a nurse in New York City, where she encountered the lives of poor and immigrant women. With limited knowledge and access to reliable contraceptives due to the Comstock Act, these women were forced to resort to five-dollar alleyway abortions. When there were complications with these horrendous procedures, Nurse Sanger was there to help. Witnessing these atrocious outcomes of unwanted pregnancy Sanger shifted her focus from nursing to advocate of proper family planning. With this in mind Sanger began producing and distributing educational material on contraceptives, which lead her to jail.

She continued her fight and on March 30, 1925 Margaret Sanger recited “The Children’s Era” speech at the Sixth International Neo-Malthusian and Birth Control Conference in New York. She spoke for the unborn and preconceived children, using a metaphor of a garden as a main point. Stating “ Before you can cultivate a garden, you must know something about gardening. You have got to give your seeds a proper soil in which to grow. You have got to give them sunlight and fresh air” (Sanger). Sanger is using this metaphor to say that before people decide to have children, they must educate and prepare themselves with a surrounding to allow the child a healthy and thriving childhood. If parents want their child to have the proper life that every child has a right to they must create a stable environment before he or she is brought into this world.

Sanger delivered the speech to those attending the conference who were seeking to control population size and make use of artificial contraception. Surrounded by scientists and liberated thinkers her piece must have had a clear and observable point of view. She used emotion and logical to appeal to the professional crowd. Those in attendance hoped that these meetings would eventually result in a viable solution. Forms of birth control and especially, abortions were illegal. Sanger having lost her own mother and watching several women suffer from dangerous abortions used her experience to fuel her fight. She knew that something had to change not only for the women, but for children’s welfare. Her speech is informative and filled with detailed examples and metaphors that further accentuate her point. She uses “we” very often in the speech, insinuating that it is they that need to correct it. She then proceeds to give her view on the steps that can be taken and enforced to create her “child’s era” future. “1. Transmissible disease 2. Temporary disease 3. Subnormal children already in the family 4. Space out between births 5. Twenty-three years as a minimum age for parents 6. Economic circumstances adequate 7. Spiritual harmony between parents” (Sanger). Any person who has any of these attributes and then decides to have a child “would make parenthood a crime” (Sanger)

Margaret Sanger had two very clear reasons for her address to the members attending the conference. First, contraception is a necessary step that needs to be taken and used by those who cannot provide for a child that may arise. Secondly and most importantly, those children have a right to a specific lifestyle that must be given to them by the parents. She provides different reasoning than most for the need of birth control. Advocating for the future life and outcome a child. She believed only those mentally and physically fit for a child should produce one. Sanger’s passion for the subject could be a downfall. However, her extensive knowledge of family planning and passion was effectively communicated to her audience. Her adeptness from nursing and research gave Sanger credibility.

Sanger devoted her life to preconceived children. She felt strongly that children brought up within the outline she described would end up in jails, asylums, or underperforming their potential and that school and charities were not the solutions to the ever growing problem, but rather the parents were. She created the road that allowed for the talk family planning which lead to our Planned Parenthoods today. Some of her views have come under criticism however, she pushed society in the right direction. Today condoms can be bought at almost any store, some girls begin taking birth control pills at only 13 years old, while the majority begin at 16 years old, and sexual health education is available in just a few short clicks. Though her methods may not be acceptable today, Margaret Sanger opened the door all the way back in the early 1900s that allowed us to be where we are today with common access to family planning materials.

Works Cited

1. Sanger, Margaret. “The Children’s Era.” Top 100 Speeches of the 20th Century – American Rhetoric, 29 Sept. 2018, www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/margaretsangerchildrensera.html.

Birth Control is Beneficial

Around the world, many women experience unplanned pregnancies. The lack of knowledge of an unplanned pregnancy can result into women get abortions, give up for adoption, mistreat treat the child, or even leave the children with grandparents for them to care. In other cases, mothers give all the love they can to their child. When there is an unwanted pregnancy everything changes for all women positive or negative. when that’s the case there should be birth control information given to everyone who are not ready to become parents. Birth control also serves many other ways than just saving one from having a baby. Birth control avoids many unwanted or unplanned pregnancies, helps women mature about body decisions and, help with body concerns and regulations.

“Past improvements in the use of birth control show the role it can play in reducing unplanned pregnancy and abortion. Between 1982 (when national data on contraceptive use among unmarried women became available) and 2002, abortion and unplanned pregnancy fell as use of birth control increased.” (Kaye et al. 7). Unwanted pregnancies and the number of abortions was reduced, when birth control was approved for all women. This shows how many women did not intend to have an unplanned pregnancy. With birth control all women are able to control when is the appropriate time to start conceiving. It also helps women know who they would like to start a family with. A pregnancy should be an aww, instead of an uh-oh

Besides helping with unplanned pregnancies and abortions birth control can help any woman to act maturely with their own body. This means that one can be in control. By controlling your body, means by taking the responsibility of knowing who you lend your body to. When on birth control should be the best way to be able to think about when to start settling and starting a family. Such as thinking more about your family’s future plans. This can give you time to think about moving forward. Birth control can be taken off when very committed to surely be off. In a clinic, there must be a confirmation of why to leave birth control.

Many women throughout the world can have irregular periods, acne, hormone change, and even really painful cramps! Birth control can help regulate and even help reduce ovarian cancer a ovarian cyst.

Work Cited

1. Kaye Kelleen, Appleton Jennifer Gootman, Stewart Alison Ng, Finley Cara.
2. Gaither, Kecia. “Birth Control: Benefits Beyond Pregnancy Prevention.” WebMD, 26 Dec. 2018, https://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/other-benefits-birth-control#. Accessed 18 Nov. 2019.

Today I am taking on the pros and cons of Birth Control. I chose to talk about this because as we all know that babies are a gift embraced by God and women; however, no body wants to have a baby by chance. It’s important to have an option avoiding that birth control method can secure pregnancy till the right time. Appreciation to Margaret Sanger and others who invented the birth control pills, everyone has an option of waiting until they are ready. According to Dawn Stacy, who mentioned that, “women and young children who are enjoying the benefit of birth control pills at the time it was approved by the U.S Food and Drugs Administration on may 9, 1960, were not 100% safe and for individuals who were taking it was at a higher risk of experiencing common side effect like bleeding between period, having breast cancer, and S.T.D”. II. Thesis: Birth control is not a bad idea for young and older women, but everyone needs to be aware of the consequences that come after because you might become one of those people who are suffering from such diseases III.

The pros and cons effect of Birth control I am going to be discussing on the pros of Birth control. I chose to talk about this pills because of how it changed everything for young and older people around the world who have to pursue higher education in reaching their careers goals. Body I. The title of first main point goes here: The pros outcomes of why some people use family planning: First, According to the Trump Administration which is Senselessly Undermining an Effective Birth Control Funding Program of Opposing Viewpoints In Context stated that, “over a decade year ago family planning have helped millions of lower income women and young people in preventing them from getting pregnant, and at least having decisions if and when they want to have children’. Well, to be honest with myself I disagree with this idea.

Why? Because, it will destroy them, thinking that oh it’s okay to have sex whenever they want, forgetting the risk they are putting themselves in. Hence, why if they encounter S.T.D or H.I.V only because they feel it’s okay. B. It helps you regulate your period and also prevent you from of getting pregnant. C. It reduces acne, helping children and women around the world in achievement their full potential or career goals as they planned for the future. D. It also start your period if you are suffering from PCOS and help those who have difficult conditions for example, seizures, extra security of condom burst. Transitional of second main point: II. Birth control has it own side effect that many young women and children don’t even have knowledge of, specifice it lead them to experience a prolong side effect in life.

For example, headache, breast cancer, bleeding, depression and fiber etc. A. The title of your second main point goes here: The cons outcomes of why you shouldn’t take birth control pills: Basically birth control pills shouldn’t take because it causes you to have fiber, headache, nausea and sometime lead you into depression B. The birth control also put you at a higher risk of getting S.T.D, specifically not being able to have children because of many complications like psychological imbalances and breast cancer. C. As a matter of fact, it’s increases risk of blood clots, and nutrient deficiencies Conclusion I.

Birth control pills are important for everyone who is seeking in advancing their life and reaching their optimist goals in life. However, it is also good to think about the negatively side effect of this pills. For example, you might want to ask yourself these questions, “what if? In the long run I end up with a diseased that can’t be cure”? Now, I am not saying you shouldn’t take birth control, what I am saying instead of taking birth control you can avoid all those side effect that I listed previously or use a condom, though it’s not 50%safe but it can prevent you from getting pregnant and having S.T.D.