Category: Biology

This week’s discussion is based on six words. You are to compose six words that

This week’s discussion is based on six words. You are to compose six words that represent what racism means to you. Not race, as that does not exist. You can use the term ethnicity to discuss cultural differences and biological ancestry or affinity when referring to physical differences (avoid the word race). Include the screen shot in your first post. (you may need to save it first as an image). Then expand on your words and explanation by including specific, relevant concepts and terminology from the assignments and reading material from this week.
Finally, you cannot use outside sources. The point of the discussions in this class is to demonstrate to me that you understand the material

Prepare a power point presentation with a thought that you will be teaching this

Prepare a power point presentation with a thought that you will be teaching this lab and showing your results and explaining them to your peers.
In your presentation include an introduction to the topic, methodology that you used, post pictures of your results, discuss in detail the conclusions from the results and highlight the practical applications of this lab in the field of Microbiology.
Your presentation should include at least 5 citations from scientific sources. Use APA format to cite references.
Label all the pictures clearly (You are required to use pictures from your lab report for the results section).
A minimum of 10 slides are required to be graded.

Writing Assignment (100-points): Students will be required to review an article

Writing Assignment (100-points): Students will be required to review an article from a scientific journal and write a two-page (minimum) summary of the article. The article may be of any topic that interests you but it MUST come from a scientific journal. The article you review should be written in scientific format with the following components: abstract, introduction, materials/methods, results, comments/discussion. If you are not sure the article you are considering is satisfactory for the assignment then verify it with your instructor. In order to receive full credit for your review of the article, you will need to address/answer the following objectives:
Who conducted the research?
What was the purpose for conducting the research? / Why was it important?
What was the hypothesis for the study? / What did they expect?
How did they conduct the experiment?
What were the results of their experimentation?
What did these results mean/indicate to the researchers?
What impact does this study have on your life? / How does it affect you?
Your journal review must also:
Be typed, double-space, 12-point, 1.0-inch margins, paragraph/essay form.
Have a cover page with: your name, course number and section; semester.
Have a minimum length of 2-pages.
Have a copy of the actual journal article stapled to the back for reference.
Helpful Websites for Locating Free Journal Articles:
www.freemedicaljournals.com
www.jwildlifedis.org

Twin studies are a special type of epidemiological studies designed to measure t

Twin studies are a special type of epidemiological studies designed to measure the contribution of genetics as opposed to the environment, to a given trait. Despite the facts that the classical twin studies are still being guided by assumptions made back in the 1920s and that the inherent limitation lies in the study design itself, the results suggested by earlier twin studies have often been confirmed by molecular genetic studies later. Use of twin registries and various innovative yet complex software packages such as the (SAS) and their extensions (e.g., SAS PROC GENMOD and SAS PROC PHREG) has increased the potential of this epidemiological tool toward contributing significantly to the field of genetics and other life sciences.

my bachelors was in biotechnology and masters in microbiolgy with focused on epi

my bachelors was in biotechnology and masters in microbiolgy with focused on epigenetics. I want a personal statement for admission in Ph.D. at columbia university in microbiology department in epigenetics research group.

collect 30 electronic news articles
concerning anything scientifically relevant

collect 30 electronic news articles
concerning anything scientifically relevant (e.g., living: organismal/community/ecosystem, non-
living: weather/chemical/physical) ~ within the Tropics. Provide the date you found the article,
the full url and write a 3 sentence summary of the article. There are several sources (Yahoo
News, Google News, the New York Times, NPR, Sciencedaily . . .)
EXAMPLE: Date: 9/5/19URL: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/1807…
Summary: The article voices a concern about the global warming effects seen in the tropics that
may decrease its diversity and endemic species. They explain about the proposals that are
thought to help save the tropics including having more conservation areas. The scientists believe
that a great solution.

This assignment will help you to think critically about the life cycle (https://

This assignment will help you to think critically about the life cycle (https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/life%20cyclLinks to an external site.) of physical evidence. It will train you to think and write like a forensic scientist by having you identify the most important aspects of physical evidence from the crime scene to courtroom, use appropriate terminology and style to discuss them, and make an argument about how they affect the criminal justice system.
Summary:
In this formal analysis, you will identify the key aspects of physical evidence in its life cycle (crime scene to courtroom/recognition to expert opinion) that you back with a detailed description of the scientific principles https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/princip… Links to an external site.) and legal requirements that govern physical evidence. Consideration should be given to all concepts covered in this course.
Logistics:
Your essay is due Saturday, December 9, 2023.
Your paper should use APA style.
Important sections:
Your essay should open with a brief, general description of the evidence item and the scene it was discovered in. The evidence item and scene particulars are to be of your own creation but should allow you to fully develop your response to this assignment.
You should include descriptions of the significant requirements of every aspect of this course.
You should conclude with an explanation of how these many elements work together to create meaningful use of physical evidence in our criminal justice system.
If necessary, you should use the APA citation style.
Evaluation Criteria:
Your grade on the assignment will depend on the following:
Your identification of the key aspects of physical evidence from the course.
Your discussion of these principles includes detail drawn from the evidence item.
Your use of these principles to describe the life cycle of the evidence item.
Your adherence to the principles of physical evidence as outlined in “Important Sections” above.
Your adherence to the principles of the role that physical evidence plays in the criminal justice system as outlined in the course materials.
Your ability to produce a paper that is free from grammar and mechanics errors.
YOU SHOULD FOCUS ON PRINCIPLES NOT METHODS

hey, Please fix the following word document following the feedback I was given b

hey, Please fix the following word document following the feedback I was given by my peers, also follow the rubric that I will provide in order to better the paper
feedback:
peer #1: 1. The format of you justification is very clean and organized. Your topic is very controversial and interesting! In terms of content and development, I strongly recommend you to not guide the reader with the subtopics such as intro, outcome (I,II, and II) and so on. 2. The introduction is missing some more background information so that the reader has a more explained introduction to the policy. I suggest you work on the organization of the paragraphs. For example, try to put the theses in the first or second sentence of the introduction. I also recommend you use some attention gathered so that the reader involves with your topic. You can use some statistics data or percentage related to shooting. 3. You did a good job explain the outcomes of your policy; however, you should expand your information a little bit more. So, you can give the reader a more in-depth background about your topic. Also, the connections between your policy and the in-text-citations are well developed, they just need a little be more explanation. 4. The use of appropriate connectors between sentences/ ideas will make your writing look more appropriate for the audience. Also, you are missing more in-text-citations so that your information does not look vague or made up. You need to convince the audience with your ideas, so you need to provide justification for all of them, so these are supported by real studies. 5. Your in-text-citations are well performed, as I mentioned, you just need to work a little bit more on the connections with your ideas and the articles cited. 6. Overall, you did a good job. The structure you worked on is very clean and organized. You just need to emphasize on those little mistakes so you can ha a great paper!
peer #2: To begin I thought that your paper was formatted beautifully. Also the topic of your paper is one of great importance and one of much discussion, so I admire that you would take it on. Your references and length of your essay were also adequate. Content & development : Your introduction made it clear where main focuses of your paper would be and also gave the reader (myself) a very valid reason for the paper important. The thesis is very well developed, and introduction very well written. However I would try to add more in depth context on the relationship between hormones and chronic stress caused by the fear of these mass shooting. Your conclusion also summarizes your two points very well however you never state what the gun control policy is. Organization: as I said before your paper is very well organized. Your paper flows very nicely. All your sections are organized in logical manger and takes into account the topic at hand. You were not supposed to use 1.5 spacing so I would changed to 1.0 Language : your language is very clear and concise, but I see many repeating phrases through the paper. Grammar was on point. Each sentence are informative and convey the idea but some seem to be repetitive. Convection: not all your facts contain in text citations.
peer # 3: SUMMARY: I really liked just how dense and packed with information this was. There is very little wasted space here. The way you got your points and ideas across were very well. CONTENT AND DEVELOPMENT: I really love your title. Very simple and straight to the point. I personally also have some of the context as to how I would solve my issue in my title as I find it adds greater depth to it, but yours still works well. You have lots of outside information present which is great. It shows that there is lots being done when it comes to your topic and that you are bringing in and considering lots of opinions and facts. Your introduction is also very well put together with it getting your main goal across, but as well with lots of context and information. ORGANIZATION: Your thoughts and the overall flow is very well put together. The topics transition very well into each other. LANGUAGE: You use very little fluff and make good use of what you have written down. Everything you have written down serves a purpose and not just to fill out words. Great work! CONVENTIONS: Every time you use an idea that is not your own you give proper respect to the author which is great. Your formatting both for when you quote someone or for your citations are great and well formatted. CONCLUSIONS: Youve done very well with what you have. Really all I would suggust is even more detail and information, but Im sure you already plan on doing that. Great work!