Category: Biology

Please read through the “results” document for the idea on writing the discussio

Please read through the “results” document for the idea on writing the discussion section.
Follow the “Discussion prompt” on how to formatting the discussion and “lab references sample” on how to formatting the reference
REPEATING GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:
Discussion: This is the section where you draw conclusions and present your interpretation of the results. This may be a mix of present and past tense. In this section, you should briefly restate your results and then relate your results to other studies and findings. The discussion should also include consider alternative hypotheses and sources of error if your results do not support your hypothesis. The last paragraph should be a statement of your main conclusions and what experiment you would do in the future.
A good discussion
• Briefly restates the results within the context of the study
• States whether the data support the hypothesis
• If present, addresses unexpected or anomalous results with specific ideas (not speculation)
• Compares results to class data or primary literature and provides specific explanations for
similarities or differences (if applicable).
• Proposes future directions that are relevant (related to the data) and specific (briefly describes the experiment)
• Addresses the overall purpose of the report discussed in the introduction
References: You should have at least 3 peer reviewed journal articles that are cited in the
introduction and discussion of the lab report. Webpages, newspaper articles and magazine articles
do not count as peer reviewed journal articles. Any facts or ideas that you did not generate
yourself must be attributed to the source where you found them. All references cited MUST be
mentioned in the text.
• Citation format should be for the Journal of Applied Physiology
• References are relevant and strengthen the ideas and arguments made in the report
• References are listed, formatted and cited as directed by the lab manual or class website.
• All statements of fact or opinion (not already known by your audience) are supported with a
citation/reference
• Minimum 3 relevant primary research articles in discussion
• Paraphrases material from references (no quotes)

Purpose: performing this lab will help the student better understand the charact

Purpose: performing this lab will help the student better understand the characteristics of prokaryotes.
Complete all parts of the document(will provide the document). Save it to your computer as a .doc, .docx , Time needed to complete this lab: approximately 2 hours, including the time needed to write up the lab report.
The lab report should give very specific information and very clearly addresses all of the requirements of the assignment. The answers are well thought-out, correct, written in detail, and in the student’s own words.
The lab report should be neat and well organized in appearance. Tables (if indicated) are clear, detailed and concise. The work is free of grammatical and spelling errors. Answers are written using formal scientific language.

In your paper include the following elements,
Introduction (approximately 100 wo

In your paper include the following elements,
Introduction (approximately 100 words)
Explain your topic and state the specific question you are addressing.
Explain why this topic is important.
Explain what you intend to accomplish in this paper.
Summary of Three Scholarly Articles (approximately 150 words each)
List each reference in APA.
After each reference, provide a summary of the article. You are not required to summarize all aspects of the paper; focus on how it attempts to answer the question you are addressing.
Presentation of an Argument from a Scholarly Source (approximately 150 words)
Select one of the articles (one that presents a clear argument) and present the argument from the article in standard form (with the premises listed above the conclusion, as with the Week 1 assignment).
Note: Articles do not always state their arguments clearly. Part of your job is to determine the argument presented in the article, as you understand it.
Evaluation of the quality of the reasoning in this source (approximately 250 words)
In your evaluation of the argument, you may address questions such as the following:
How well supported are the argument’s premises?
How strongly do the argument’s premises support the truth of the conclusion?
What (if any) missing premises would be needed to complete the argument (make it valid/strong)? Are these missing premises justified or merely assumptions?
How might someone with a different point of view reply to this argument?
Discussion of Research on this Topic (approximately 200 words)
In your paper, discuss your answers to questions, such as the following:
Was it hard to find scholarly sources on your topic?
Which side of your question do most sources seem to fall on?
If they are lopsided (more on one side than the other), why do you think that might be?
What type of further research would help you to discover which answer to your research question is most supported by the evidence?
Evaluation of Arguments in Non-Scholarly and Scholarly Sources (approximately 150 words)
Evaluate the difference in the quality of reasoning or in the degree of support for premises in scholarly sources contrasted with non-scholarly sources (e.g., between the scholarly sources you used for this paper and the popular sources you used for your Week 1 paper).
If you need support, review the Scholarly and Popular Resources video.
Conclusion (approximately 100 words)
Reflect on how this activity might influence how you conduct research in the future

Please use the template that is attached. It includes the charts and figures tha

Please use the template that is attached. It includes the charts and figures that need to be included and instructions on how to set up the paper. The attached introduction to the virtual lab assignment has information and sources that need to be included.
Information on Methods and Results/Data Analysis
There were 100 participants, 50 males and 50 females, who were selected to participate in this research project. They were recruited from doctors’ offices in southeastern Pennsylvania between October 2021 and October 2022. The study design was a cross-sectional study. This is a type of research design in which the researchers collect data from many different individuals at a single point in time. In cross-sectional research, experimenters observe variables without influencing them.
In order to participate in this one-time experiment, participants had to be between the ages of 17 to 54 years, without a history of hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, asthma, pulmonary embolism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, or pulmonary hypertension. A COVID-19 diagnosis within 3 months of the study excluded participants from participation.
If participants met the study criteria and they agreed to participate, data was collected from them. This is considered a convenience sample. Convenience sampling is a non-probability sampling method where units are selected for inclusion in the sample because they are the easiest for the researcher to access. This can be due to geographical proximity, availability at a given time, or willingness to participate in the research.
During normal office visits participants were given a brief survey at the beginning of the appointment that assessed several risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Part of the survey asked participants to respond to several yes or no questions:
• Do you have a family history of high blood pressure, stroke, or myocardial infarction?
• Do you consume under 1,500 mg of sodium per day through dietary sources?
• Do you exercise at least 3 times per week for 30 minutes or more?
• Do you drink alcohol regularly? Regular drinking is defined as, is two drinks a day for men and one drink a day for women. A single drink is five ounces of wine, 12 ounces of beer or 1.5 ounces of liquor.
Weight was taken using a standardized physical beam scale and height was measured using a standardized wall mount measuring rod. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated based off of height and weight. The National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s BMI calculator was used. Blood pressure was measured using a standard sphygmomanometer following the guidelines of the American Heart Association. Measurements were taken after a rest period of 10 minutes in a seated position. Age was self-reported by the participants. Participants were asked their birthdate (month, day, and year) and experimenters calculated the number of years.

Read the paper below. Write a paragraph summarizing the most important aspects

Read the paper below. Write a paragraph summarizing the most important aspects of this paper (main findings, hypotheses, etc.).

When writing a reflection, please keep in mind that you are not summarizing the

When writing a reflection, please keep in mind that you are not summarizing the article, agreeing or disagreeing with the article, or critiquing the article. After you have read the article think about the following which includes, but is not limited to:

What did you learn about these particular topics?

How does this article pertain to your major and/or career?

How can you adopt this article into your own field of science?

How is this article associated with modern science?

Which aspects of this article is relevant to today’s modern world of science?

Does this article increase your level of content knowledge?

Using the data you gather as the data/analysis section, create a lab report for

Using the data you gather as the data/analysis section, create a lab report for this activity using the scientific method format provided by your instructor, lab report should include the following sections:
Title- The title describes what the reader is about to read in a way that is clear and concise.
Bioformatics (will be given the data to complete this lab)5 paragraphs minimum
Purpose-The purpose section is titled properly and is clear, concise, and complete
Hypothesis-
The hypothesis section is logically written in an “If… then” statement. Sound reasoning is provided to support the hypothesis statement. The statement is clear, specific, and correct for the experiment discussed within the paper.
Materials and Methods-The materials and methods section contains a comprehensive explanation of how the experiment was performed in a way that can be replicated perfectly by the reader. This section contains exact quantities of materials used and all pertinent information to replicate the experiment. The materials and methods section is written in past tense and in third person. This section contains the materials and methods ONLY and does not contain any inappropriate information like the results
Results-The data are clearly provided in a typed table, graph, chart, or figure. Whichever of the above items is picked to display the data, is clearly labeled with a title and brief explanation of what the table, figure, etc. contains. Units are included in the results section when applicable. Also, this section contains only appropriate information. For example, an interpretation of the results is not given, since this information is provided in the conclusion section.
Conclusions-conclusion sections that are complete and include the following information/ answers to the following questions: The conclusions are clearly and concisely stated for each aspect of the experiment performed. There is a statement as to whether the data support or do not support the hypothesis that contains logical reasoning. Since the conclusion is an interpretation of the results, this section should discuss answers to the following questions: “What happened?”, “Was this expected or not expected?”, “Why?”, and “If the results were not as expected, what are some reasons why this may have occurred?”. Papers that score this high mark will also include ideas for improving the experiment moving forward if the results were not as expected.

Performing this lab will help you understand how biologists are able to utilize

Performing this lab will help you understand how biologists are able to utilize evolutionary theory to test hypotheses and document evolution at the species level. This requires an understanding of the evolutionary processes that affect populations and bring about microevolution. In order to be able to describe microevolutionary processes that affect the genetic variation of a population, we need to be able to describe the genetic structure of a population. This entails that we are able to describe a population’s genotypic and allelic frequencies and know what genotypic frequencies to expect if the population is not evolving.
read the instructions document twice before you begin and complete the worksheet (will provide the documents) using this data in the data/analysis section, create a lab report for this activity using the scientific method format
lab report should include the following sections:
Title- The title describes what the reader is about to read in a way that is clear and concise.
Purpose-The purpose section is titled properly and is clear, concise, and complete
Hypothesis-
The hypothesis section is logically written in an “If… then” statement. Sound reasoning is provided to support the hypothesis statement. The statement is clear, specific, and correct for the experiment discussed within the paper.
Materials and Methods-The materials and methods section contains a comprehensive explanation of how the experiment was performed in a way that can be replicated perfectly by the reader. This section contains exact quantities of materials used and all pertinent information to replicate the experiment. The materials and methods section is written in past tense and in third person. This section contains the materials and methods ONLY and does not contain any inappropriate information like the results
Results-The data are clearly provided in a typed table, graph, chart, or figure. Whichever of the above items is picked to display the data, is clearly labeled with a title and brief explanation of what the table, figure, etc. contains. Units are included in the results section when applicable. Also, this section contains only appropriate information. For example, an interpretation of the results is not given, since this information is provided in the conclusion section.
Conclusions-conclusion sections that are complete and include the following information/ answers to the following questions: The conclusions are clearly and concisely stated for each aspect of the experiment performed. There is a statement as to whether the data support or do not support the hypothesis that contains logical reasoning. Since the conclusion is an interpretation of the results, this section should discuss answers to the following questions: “What happened?”, “Was this expected or not expected?”, “Why?”, and “If the results were not as expected, what are some reasons why this may have occurred?”. Papers that score this high mark will also include ideas for improving the experiment moving forward if the results were not as expected.

Please come up with and write 40 total questions from the provided PowerPoints.

Please come up with and write 40 total questions from the provided PowerPoints. distributed equally from each powerpoint. Include 30 multiple choice and 10 T/F. Indicate the right answer!!! Make sure to submit TYPED question & answers clearly marked.

Use the guidelines in the “Sample Cardiopulmonary Lab Report” PDF link (module t

Use the guidelines in the “Sample Cardiopulmonary Lab Report” PDF link (module task below the assignment task) to write a report summarizing the effect of exercise on cardiopulmonary function. “Sample Cardiopulmonary Lab Report!” Report on the effect of exercise on heart rate, pulmonary rate, and blood pressure. Use the means of the class data and determine whether there was a gender effect. Submit the text to the turnitin assignment link below. ONLY .doc/.docx files should be submitted! When pasting your graphs and tables, be sure to “paste as picture” so that they appear formatted correctly.