I have provided the doc with the instructions for everything you need to know fo
I have provided the doc with the instructions for everything you need to know for the assignment.
The reading pdf is also attached that you will be writing the paper on.
I need a Plagarism and AI report.
Latasha, a part time college student, recently went to a doctor’s appointment fo
Latasha, a part time college student, recently went to a doctor’s appointment for a high fever and strep throat. The doctor prescribed her Amoxicillin for 10 days. After taking antibiotics for 5 days, she started to feel better, so she stopped taking the medication. However, a couple of weeks later, Latasha returned to the doctor. Instead of prescribing her the same medication, the doctor wrote Latasha a 5-day prescription of Zpack.
Watch this video on
Antibiotics and Resistance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDxQT1MRwhk&t=10s
and read the article found at
https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/features/antibiotic-alternatives-amr-resistance/
BEFORE responding to the prompts.
Answer all three parts of the initial prompt below
How have antibiotics changed the quality of life for humans over the past century?
Guidance: It is important to use the video or transcript for your post (not Google or other sources); it has everything you need! Be sure to include specifics on how the QUALITY of human life has changed when comparing life before antibiotics to life after antibiotics.
Explain why Latasha’s failure to take her antibiotics as prescribed might contribute to the evolution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Guidance: It is important to use the video or transcript for your post (not Google or other sources); it has everything you need! The focus of your response is on an EXPLANATION of the EVOLUTION of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Review the video and article provided in the Discussion Background and Discuss which of the approaches to combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria is best and why.
Guidance: It is important to use the video (or video transcript) and the article for your post (not Google or other sources); they have everything you need! Be sure discuss ONE suggested approach to combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria and WHY it is the best.
The topic is how the impact of trauma can affect brain structure and functioning
The topic is how the impact of trauma can affect brain structure and functioning. Instructions for the 129 Final Research Report: DUE 7/27/6
The structure for your report is somewhat flexible, but it must include a summary, introduction (rationale and background), a brief description of the methods and findings, and your discussion of the research (the latter is very important). You should also have your list of at least 5 empirical, primary source references (this and the entire paper in APA, of course!). As discussed in class, you may construct your final report as the SJSU Psych 100w paper, so that there are essentially a series of chronologically-ordered article summaries. If this is your approach, you must state the rationale, background information and theoretical propositions in an introductory section. To complete your paper with the page limitations, you will also have to summarize some of the studies more than would be expected in a 100w paper. You must describe what was done in the studies that you have cited, but some detailed information (e.g., numbers of participants) should be omitted. You must also have a conclusion/discussion section which is your critical analysis of the work that you reviewed. This is where you tie everything together, and you discuss the imitations and the strengths of the research on your topic.
If you choose to organize your paper as a traditional research paper, it would read like a review article, which I’m sure you have come across in your research. You might organize your paper in this way and I’ve provided some additional example formats below. In all cases, the methods and results would be discussed, but they would greatly summarized.
To reiterate, for all papers, instead of an “Abstract”, you should open your paper with a “Summary” page of your research. It should include a rationale, thesis, methods (e.g., humans, animals, tests?) general results, and your final conclusion. Again, your paper is to be based on empirical research (at least 5 references), and is to be at least 5 pages in length (please, no more than 10 pages). Your research report will be graded on content and clarity (first and foremost). Still, do remember APA format!
Critical Evaluation and Final Paper Tips
During the course of the semester you will science-based material. Below are some general tips followed by a “checklist” that follows the format of a scientific report. Please use this guide as a reference for your final term paper and when reading and evaluating journal articles.
General Tips For Your Critical Evaluation and Final Paper:
• Write as though you are writing the paper for submission to a scientific journal.
• Be careful of colloquialisms. Although the active form of writing is generally more engaging, the written word is not like the spoken word. Avoid using ’empty words’ or words that are just filler words.
• Get your final draft proof read by friends, family or the Writing Center. If they don’t understand your paper, you haven’t been clear enough.
Introduction
• The introduction serves to logically present the background information/provide context for the study.
• Is the purpose or problem clearly stated?
• Why is it important (rationale & justification)?
• Are your objectives clearly stated?
Methods
You will need to describe some of the methods, although you are not required to include a separate “Methods” section. Below are some considerations when describing methods.
• Are you discussing both animal and human studies? Be certain to make this clear, and consider what the pros and cons of each are.
• Describe what materials or instruments were used and how they were used in the study.
• Was the research design satisfactory?
• Were the research methods sound?
Results
Again, a separate “Results” section is not required,but can be included if you wish. Questions to be considered are:
• Were the findings described the research appropriate for the stated objectives?
• Did the results make sense, and did the conclusions extend beyond what the data showed?
• Were statistical hypotheses clearly supported or refuted?
Discussion
This section is intended to be your opportunity to synthesize, critique and analyze your research articles. Below are questions to be addressed.
• Have you discussed the potential explanations for the results discussed?
• Have other studies come to similar/different conclusions?
• Did the authors account for discrepancies among research findings?
• Are the conclusions supported by the data that you reviewed?
• What is the main point?
• Do you see a need for future research?
Comments: You should discuss the strengths and weakness of the research. You might also suggest changes that would strengthen this line of study.
Below is the grading rubric for the written report report
Low Average High Total Possible
Ill-defined rationale and purpose. No evidence of purpose or direction of research. Lacks central theme.
Minimal background and little rationale provided
Complete background, clear rationale.
7
Presentation of supporting research so lacking in detail that topic remains undeveloped.
Incomplete development. More information is needed.
Topic is thoroughly described. Presentation is rich in information.
5
Lack of any logical organization of ideas. Articles discuss several issues but relationship to each other is unclear
Some organization of ideas is evident, but there remains confusion.
Well-organized ideas. Organization provides a clear idea of background and purpose.
5
Little understanding of experimental procedures and/or variables.
Understanding of experimental procedures and/or variables, but little understanding of concepts and rationale behind them.
Clear description of manipulations and procedures, and the logic underlying their use.
3
Results and findings ill defined.
Results stated, analysis unclear.
Results and analysis clearly stated.
5
Conclusions and implications unclear and unsupported. Discussion of overall findings incomplete.
Conclusion and implications somewhat vague. Merely restates article summary conclusions, lacks integration of material
Conclusions and implications clear and persuasive.
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader solidly understanding the research presented, and why the findings are important and relevant. Excellent integration of material clearly delineating necessary and sufficient treatment issues
7
• Grammatical errors substantially detract from the paper.
• Spelling or punctuation errors detract substantially from the paper.
• Grammatical errors interfere with reading the paper.
• Spelling or punctuation errors are noticeable.
• Grammatical errors are minimal and do not detract from the paper.
• No or minimal spelling, or punctuation errors.
-6 per
section
Reference and citation errors detract significantly from paper
Missing or incorrectly written references or citations. Uncited work in references or unreferenced work cited.
All references and citations are correctly written and present.
Up to -6
General clarity and cohesion is worth 3 points. The Summary is worth 3 points, Total points for this assignment are 35.
When we get sick there are a variety of things we do depending on if the cause i
When we get sick there are a variety of things we do depending on if the cause is bacterial, protistal, fungal, viral, or animal based. Why is it there are so many treatments for being “sick”? Why don’t we have a one sized fits all approach? E.g. Why can’t you take antibiotics for the common cold (you can’t …….. right?)?
Create a lecture (transсrіpt) about the article ″in vivo adenine base editing of
Create a lecture (transсrіpt) about the article ″in vivo adenine base editing of pcsk9 in macaques reduces ldl cholesterol levels″. The lecture will include an introduction that includes an explanation of each part of the article′s title: in vivo, adenine base editing, pcsk9, macaques and their resemblance to humans, ldl cholesterol.
In addition, introduce the head of the laboratory and a little about the laboratory that performed the research. Highlight the research question
And what was their motivation to do the research, and what is the innovation that their research gives.
Then detail all the panels in the four figures in the article – in the detail formulated as a lecture it should be formulated how to present the entire panel structure, for example if it is a column graph – then what is each axis, what does each column mean, what are the error lines, what is the meaning of the points on Each column, why is a column split into 2. and then briefly explain on each panel the reference from the results chapter.
Finally give a brief overview of what happened.
Show what studies can be done after this study – suggestions for future studies.
and criticism of the article
Create a mind map to summarize your knowledge, how it applies to your experience
Create a mind map to summarize your knowledge, how it applies to your experiences, and how that knowledge can be utilized in the future. This is a REFLECTIVE activity, please focus on personal experiences, connections between units, and how they relate to your prior knowledge.
Your mind map should have branches for each unit that was covered in class. (ie. 5 units = 5 branches). For each unit you must include:
1 main takeaway – what did you find interesting, something you related with
1 challenge – reflecting on difficulties and how you overcame it
1 application (requires research) – summarize findings, must be recent
1 image (include in-text citations)
5-6 sentences/points for each takeaway, reflection and application (can be done in point form)
TOTAL: 15-18 sentences/points and 1 image PER UNIT.
The topic is how the impact of trauma can affect brain structure and functioning
The topic is how the impact of trauma can affect brain structure and functioning.
Instructions for the 129 Final Research Report: DUE 7/27/6
The structure for your report is somewhat flexible, but it must include a summary, introduction (rationale and background), a brief description of the methods and findings, and your discussion of the research (the latter is very important). You should also have your list of at least 5 empirical, primary source references (this and the entire paper in APA, of course!). As discussed in class, you may construct your final report as the SJSU Psych 100w paper, so that there are essentially a series of chronologically-ordered article summaries. If this is your approach, you must state the rationale, background information and theoretical propositions in an introductory section. To complete your paper with the page limitations, you will also have to summarize some of the studies more than would be expected in a 100w paper. You must describe what was done in the studies that you have cited, but some detailed information (e.g., numbers of participants) should be omitted. You must also have a conclusion/discussion section which is your critical analysis of the work that you reviewed. This is where you tie everything together, and you discuss the imitations and the strengths of the research on your topic.
If you choose to organize your paper as a traditional research paper, it would read like a review article, which I’m sure you have come across in your research. You might organize your paper in this way and I’ve provided some additional example formats below. In all cases, the methods and results would be discussed, but they would greatly summarized.
To reiterate, for all papers, instead of an “Abstract”, you should open your paper with a “Summary” page of your research. It should include a rationale, thesis, methods (e.g., humans, animals, tests?) general results, and your final conclusion. Again, your paper is to be based on empirical research (at least 5 references), and is to be at least 5 pages in length (please, no more than 10 pages). Your research report will be graded on content and clarity (first and foremost). Still, do remember APA format!
Critical Evaluation and Final Paper Tips
During the course of the semester you will science-based material. Below are some general tips followed by a “checklist” that follows the format of a scientific report. Please use this guide as a reference for your final term paper and when reading and evaluating journal articles.
General Tips For Your Critical Evaluation and Final Paper:
Write as though you are writing the paper for submission to a scientific journal.
Be careful of colloquialisms. Although the active form of writing is generally more engaging, the written word is not like the spoken word. Avoid using ’empty words’ or words that are just filler words.
Get your final draft proof read by friends, family or the Writing Center. If they don’t understand your paper, you haven’t been clear enough.
Introduction
The introduction serves to logically present the background information/provide context for the study.
Is the purpose or problem clearly stated?
Why is it important (rationale & justification)?
Are your objectives clearly stated?
Methods
You will need to describe some of the methods, although you are not required to include a separate “Methods” section. Below are some considerations when describing methods.
Are you discussing both animal and human studies? Be certain to make this clear, and consider what the pros and cons of each are.
Describe what materials or instruments were used and how they were used in the study.
Was the research design satisfactory?
Were the research methods sound?
Results
Again, a separate “Results” section is not required,but can be included if you wish. Questions to be considered are:
Were the findings described the research appropriate for the stated objectives?
Did the results make sense, and did the conclusions extend beyond what the data showed?
Were statistical hypotheses clearly supported or refuted?
Discussion
This section is intended to be your opportunity to synthesize, critique and analyze your research articles. Below are questions to be addressed.
Have you discussed the potential explanations for the results discussed?
Have other studies come to similar/different conclusions?
Did the authors account for discrepancies among research findings?
Are the conclusions supported by the data that you reviewed?
What is the main point?
Do you see a need for future research?
Comments: You should discuss the strengths and weakness of the research. You might also suggest changes that would strengthen this line of study.
Below is the grading rubric for the written report report
Low Average High Total Possible
Ill-defined rationale and purpose. No evidence of purpose or direction of research. Lacks central theme.
Minimal background and little rationale provided
Complete background, clear rationale.
7
Presentation of supporting research so lacking in detail that topic remains undeveloped.
Incomplete development. More information is needed.
Topic is thoroughly described. Presentation is rich in information.
5
Lack of any logical organization of ideas. Articles discuss several issues but relationship to each other is unclear
Some organization of ideas is evident, but there remains confusion.
Well-organized ideas. Organization provides a clear idea of background and purpose.
5
Little understanding of experimental procedures and/or variables.
Understanding of experimental procedures and/or variables, but little understanding of concepts and rationale behind them.
Clear description of manipulations and procedures, and the logic underlying their use.
3
Results and findings ill defined.
Results stated, analysis unclear.
Results and analysis clearly stated.
5
Conclusions and implications unclear and unsupported. Discussion of overall findings incomplete.
Conclusion and implications somewhat vague. Merely restates article summary conclusions, lacks integration of material
Conclusions and implications clear and persuasive.
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader solidly understanding the research presented, and why the findings are important and relevant. Excellent integration of material clearly delineating necessary and sufficient treatment issues
7
Grammatical errors substantially detract from the paper.
Spelling or punctuation errors detract substantially from the paper.
Grammatical errors interfere with reading the paper.
Spelling or punctuation errors are noticeable.
Grammatical errors are minimal and do not detract from the paper.
No or minimal spelling, or punctuation errors.
-6 per
section
Reference and citation errors detract significantly from paper
Missing or incorrectly written references or citations. Uncited work in references or unreferenced work cited.
All references and citations are correctly written and present.
Up to -6
General clarity and cohesion is worth 3 points. The Summary is worth 3 points, Total points for this assignment are 35.
Parts of this were borrowed from: Pattron, D. 2000. Fundamentals of Scientific Research. New York: Scientific Publishers.
The topic is how the impact of trauma can affect brain structure and functioning
The topic is how the impact of trauma can affect brain structure and functioning.
Instructions for the 129 Final Research Report: DUE 7/27/6
The structure for your report is somewhat flexible, but it must include a summary, introduction (rationale and background), a brief description of the methods and findings, and your discussion of the research (the latter is very important). You should also have your list of at least 5 empirical, primary source references (this and the entire paper in APA, of course!). As discussed in class, you may construct your final report as the SJSU Psych 100w paper, so that there are essentially a series of chronologically-ordered article summaries. If this is your approach, you must state the rationale, background information and theoretical propositions in an introductory section. To complete your paper with the page limitations, you will also have to summarize some of the studies more than would be expected in a 100w paper. You must describe what was done in the studies that you have cited, but some detailed information (e.g., numbers of participants) should be omitted. You must also have a conclusion/discussion section which is your critical analysis of the work that you reviewed. This is where you tie everything together, and you discuss the imitations and the strengths of the research on your topic.
If you choose to organize your paper as a traditional research paper, it would read like a review article, which I’m sure you have come across in your research. You might organize your paper in this way and I’ve provided some additional example formats below. In all cases, the methods and results would be discussed, but they would greatly summarized.
To reiterate, for all papers, instead of an “Abstract”, you should open your paper with a “Summary” page of your research. It should include a rationale, thesis, methods (e.g., humans, animals, tests?) general results, and your final conclusion. Again, your paper is to be based on empirical research (at least 5 references), and is to be at least 5 pages in length (please, no more than 10 pages). Your research report will be graded on content and clarity (first and foremost). Still, do remember APA format!
Critical Evaluation and Final Paper Tips
During the course of the semester you will science-based material. Below are some general tips followed by a “checklist” that follows the format of a scientific report. Please use this guide as a reference for your final term paper and when reading and evaluating journal articles.
General Tips For Your Critical Evaluation and Final Paper:
Write as though you are writing the paper for submission to a scientific journal.
Be careful of colloquialisms. Although the active form of writing is generally more engaging, the written word is not like the spoken word. Avoid using ’empty words’ or words that are just filler words.
Get your final draft proof read by friends, family or the Writing Center. If they don’t understand your paper, you haven’t been clear enough.
Introduction
The introduction serves to logically present the background information/provide context for the study.
Is the purpose or problem clearly stated?
Why is it important (rationale & justification)?
Are your objectives clearly stated?
Methods
You will need to describe some of the methods, although you are not required to include a separate “Methods” section. Below are some considerations when describing methods.
Are you discussing both animal and human studies? Be certain to make this clear, and consider what the pros and cons of each are.
Describe what materials or instruments were used and how they were used in the study.
Was the research design satisfactory?
Were the research methods sound?
Results
Again, a separate “Results” section is not required,but can be included if you wish. Questions to be considered are:
Were the findings described the research appropriate for the stated objectives?
Did the results make sense, and did the conclusions extend beyond what the data showed?
Were statistical hypotheses clearly supported or refuted?
Discussion
This section is intended to be your opportunity to synthesize, critique and analyze your research articles. Below are questions to be addressed.
Have you discussed the potential explanations for the results discussed?
Have other studies come to similar/different conclusions?
Did the authors account for discrepancies among research findings?
Are the conclusions supported by the data that you reviewed?
What is the main point?
Do you see a need for future research?
Comments: You should discuss the strengths and weakness of the research. You might also suggest changes that would strengthen this line of study.
Below is the grading rubric for the written report report
Low Average High Total Possible
Ill-defined rationale and purpose. No evidence of purpose or direction of research. Lacks central theme.
Minimal background and little rationale provided
Complete background, clear rationale.
7
Presentation of supporting research so lacking in detail that topic remains undeveloped.
Incomplete development. More information is needed.
Topic is thoroughly described. Presentation is rich in information.
5
Lack of any logical organization of ideas. Articles discuss several issues but relationship to each other is unclear
Some organization of ideas is evident, but there remains confusion.
Well-organized ideas. Organization provides a clear idea of background and purpose.
5
Little understanding of experimental procedures and/or variables.
Understanding of experimental procedures and/or variables, but little understanding of concepts and rationale behind them.
Clear description of manipulations and procedures, and the logic underlying their use.
3
Results and findings ill defined.
Results stated, analysis unclear.
Results and analysis clearly stated.
5
Conclusions and implications unclear and unsupported. Discussion of overall findings incomplete.
Conclusion and implications somewhat vague. Merely restates article summary conclusions, lacks integration of material
Conclusions and implications clear and persuasive.
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader solidly understanding the research presented, and why the findings are important and relevant. Excellent integration of material clearly delineating necessary and sufficient treatment issues
7
Grammatical errors substantially detract from the paper.
Spelling or punctuation errors detract substantially from the paper.
Grammatical errors interfere with reading the paper.
Spelling or punctuation errors are noticeable.
Grammatical errors are minimal and do not detract from the paper.
No or minimal spelling, or punctuation errors.
-6 per
section
Reference and citation errors detract significantly from paper
Missing or incorrectly written references or citations. Uncited work in references or unreferenced work cited.
All references and citations are correctly written and present.
Up to -6
General clarity and cohesion is worth 3 points. The Summary is worth 3 points, Total points for this assignment are 35.
Parts of this were borrowed from: Pattron, D. 2000. Fundamentals of Scientific Research. New York: Scientific Publishers.
Local Food Sources
Societies today depend upon agriculture to some extent in ord
Local Food Sources
Societies today depend upon agriculture to some extent in order to provide food for the people who live there. Often, food is grown/raised in close proximity to where it is used. More often, though, it is transported from somewhere else, often from a source very far from where it is actually consumed. The energy, usually fossil fuel, used becomes part of the cost of the food. This cost must also be figured into pollution from the exhaust and wastes produced from burning fossil fuel. In addition, the aim of “buying local” is to put much needed funds into the small businesses and farms that exist and depend upon the community itself.
The goal of this worksheet is to find out what food sources are available in your area. You may be surprised!
Download the Food Sources worksheet on the front page of the course and submit it to the corresponding Turnitin Assignment.
The assignment will be out of 100 points.
The table is worth 20 points.
Each question is worth 16 points.
Local area is Columbus GA
Students will be required to write a short paper (3-5 double spaced pages) about
Students will be required to write a short paper (3-5 double spaced pages) about any of the following topics: Thalassemia, Diabetes mellitus, Heart failure, Varicose veins, Ulcerative colitis, Lymphedema, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Renal failure, Pre-eclampsia.
Items to be discussed in the paper include:
1. Risk factors/ cause of disease.
2. Clinical picture of the patient (signs/ symptoms).
3. Diagnosis of the disease (laboratory diagnosis/ imaging techniques).
4. Treatment
5. Prevention
6. References
You can include images if you would like with making sure to include the source of the image (a website link).