Critically thinking about the material presented in the courses you are taking c

Critically thinking about the material presented in the courses you are taking c

Critically thinking about the material presented in the courses you are taking can be challenging, especially when we believe that we already have a robust understanding of the domain. For example, you may, at this point in your academic career, have already studied behaviorism, so you may believe you already have a deep understanding of what this theory is. However, consider the theory based on learning. The foundations of behaviorism suggest that we learn, not based on thought, but on physiological needs. This foundation was based on radical behaviorism, a sub-theory. Critically consider the evolution of behaviorism, and apply this to the following prompts.
To successfully complete this journal:
Take the pre-test in Chapter 1: The Foundations of Behaviorism in your required text. Discuss your results.
Discuss why the multiple sub-theories and frameworks of behaviorism can be confusing based on their differing suggestions.
Give real-life examples of association doctrine and connectionism, and explain the two differing aspects of each.
Compare and contrast the stimulus-response (S-R) model and the law of effect (S-O-R) and how the inclusion of a confirming reaction changes the model. Why does it matter?
Outline the historical evolution of behaviorism suggested by its sub-theories (e.g. molar, radial, and psychological behaviorism).
Summarize any takeaways that you have developed about behaviorism, including its sub-theories, based on the content this week and explain how this evolution supported cognitivism.
Your journal this week should be 700 to 900 words and have an introduction and a conclusion 

Please review the instructions below. I have uploaded everything needed for the

Please review the instructions below. I have uploaded
everything needed for the

Please review the instructions below. I have uploaded
everything needed for the assignment. Please be sure to use sources that are 5
years old and current. Please reframe it using Wikipedia and other sources.
Also, please, no incidents of ethical scholarship issues. Thanks for all you do
in advance!

Please review the instructions below. I have uploaded everything needed for the

Please review the instructions below. I have uploaded
everything needed for the

Please review the instructions below. I have uploaded
everything needed for the assignment. Please be sure to use sources that are 5
years old and current. Please reframe it using Wikipedia and other sources.
Also, please, no incidents of ethical scholarship issues. Thanks for all you do
in advance!

Assignment # 1  Effective Classroom Interventions Now is the time to review the

Assignment # 1  Effective Classroom Interventions
Now is the time to review the

Assignment # 1  Effective Classroom Interventions
Now is the time to review the instructional videos in the file named EEX6051 APA Formatting and Other Assignment Resources. To satisfy the requirements of this assignment you are expected to incorporate the information in the videos into your submission.
In this assignment you will examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence Based Practices (EBP).   Your paper should be to the point but comprehensively examine at least 3 evidence-based practices that can be used in RTI settings. RTI settings allows for a lot of room related to program delivery so you should be able to examine how RTI and EBP are connected in real life classrooms.  You should also examine the role of evidence-based practices and the criteria that you used to determithese interventions were adequately vetted classroom practices. This paper is not to be lengthy – a maximum of 5  sure you understand the differences among evidence-based, research-based, promising and emerging practices. 
IMPORTANT:  
Use these headings for your submission;
Introduction (Purpose of the paper. List your 3 effective practices.)
Strategy One (Name and describe how the strategy works. What criteria did you use to determine this strategy is effective?)
Literature Review (Examination of Professional Literature- How has this strategy been proven to be effective?)
(Repeat for strategies 2 and 3)
Conclusion
Sites that will help you find effective and ineffective interventions.
The site What Works Clearinghouse is a great place to confirm your chosen strategies are evidence-based.   From the opening page, you can search by academic area as well as behavior.
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/383/bmj-2023-076733.full.pdf
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
https://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/evidence-based-practices
Links from the UWF Library
Watch these two short videos from the UWF library. They will save you hours of time searching.
https://video.lib.uwf.edu/video_player/play.php?ok&iframe=no&width=1482&height=746&security=unrestricted&res=720&course=research_tutorials&video=searching_google_effectively
https://video.lib.uwf.edu/video_player/play.php?ok&iframe=no&width=1482&height=746&security=unrestricted&res=720&course=research_tutorials&video=discovering_and_locating_sources

Assignment # 1  Effective Classroom Interventions Now is the time to review the

Assignment # 1  Effective Classroom Interventions
Now is the time to review the

Assignment # 1  Effective Classroom Interventions
Now is the time to review the instructional videos in the file named EEX6051 APA Formatting and Other Assignment Resources. To satisfy the requirements of this assignment you are expected to incorporate the information in the videos into your submission.
In this assignment you will examine Response to Intervention (RTI) and Evidence Based Practices (EBP).   Your paper should be to the point but comprehensively examine at least 3 evidence-based practices that can be used in RTI settings. RTI settings allows for a lot of room related to program delivery so you should be able to examine how RTI and EBP are connected in real life classrooms.  You should also examine the role of evidence-based practices and the criteria that you used to determithese interventions were adequately vetted classroom practices. This paper is not to be lengthy – a maximum of 5  sure you understand the differences among evidence-based, research-based, promising and emerging practices. 
IMPORTANT:  
Use these headings for your submission;
Introduction (Purpose of the paper. List your 3 effective practices.)
Strategy One (Name and describe how the strategy works. What criteria did you use to determine this strategy is effective?)
Literature Review (Examination of Professional Literature- How has this strategy been proven to be effective?)
(Repeat for strategies 2 and 3)
Conclusion
Sites that will help you find effective and ineffective interventions.
The site What Works Clearinghouse is a great place to confirm your chosen strategies are evidence-based.   From the opening page, you can search by academic area as well as behavior.
https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/383/bmj-2023-076733.full.pdf
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
https://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/evidence-based-practices
Links from the UWF Library
Watch these two short videos from the UWF library. They will save you hours of time searching.
https://video.lib.uwf.edu/video_player/play.php?ok&iframe=no&width=1482&height=746&security=unrestricted&res=720&course=research_tutorials&video=searching_google_effectively
https://video.lib.uwf.edu/video_player/play.php?ok&iframe=no&width=1482&height=746&security=unrestricted&res=720&course=research_tutorials&video=discovering_and_locating_sources

Five paragraph persuasive essay of 750-1000 words. Topic is marijuana. My stance

Five paragraph persuasive essay of 750-1000 words. Topic is marijuana. My stance

Five paragraph persuasive essay of 750-1000 words. Topic is marijuana. My stance is I am against. Chose three articles: Texas Highways why the likeliest of states-ours- should legalize marijuana next one is Smoke and Mirrors: the recreational marijuana debate and side effects of marijuana

This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric displayed earlier in the course.

This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric displayed earlier in the course.

This assignment will use the Assignment Rubric displayed earlier in the course. Your original posts and responses are to be reflective of the current literature, clearly state your position and be brief but thorough. Your responses should also be respectful of the person whose post you are responding to. In this discussion, you will present two effective RTI and/or EBP strategies. You can do 2 of EBP or RTI or 2 of either one of the topics.  Your discussion should reflect best practices as found in the literature and not a personal preference. Your posts do not have to be long but complete enough that others can understand the intervention or strategy and how it is used. Cite the literature you reviewed supporting your position.
RTI and EBP cover a lot of territory. Obviously, you could not cover the entire area of responses in these topics so focus your posts on a specific element(s) of RTI or EBP such as the state of the literature in these topics, issues, and problems with some element of RTI or EBP or issues with implementation of RTI or EBP. Please free to focus on any elements of EBP or RtI that you find interesting.
Rubic
Critera                                                                     Ratings
Grasp of readings
Excellent
Writing and oral expression represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.
Good
Writing and oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.
Developing
Writing and oral presentation mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.
Needs Improvement
Writing and/or poor oral presentation represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion.
Critical analysis
Excellent
Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.
Good
Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.
Developing
Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.
Needs Improvement
Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion.
Evidence
Excellent
Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.
Good 
Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.
Developing
Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.
Some opinion.
Needs Improvement
Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion.
Organization & Clarity
Excellent
Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.
Good
Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.
Developing
Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.
Needs Improvement
Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion.
Mechanics
Excellent
When applicable, thoughts/paper are appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.
Good
Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.
Developing
There are many formatting, spelling, word usage and grammar issues.
Needs Improvement
Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors.

The topic is emerging adulthood :  I placed different options for the article re

The topic is emerging adulthood : 
I placed different options for the article re

The topic is emerging adulthood : 
I placed different options for the article review, choose which ever you believe is best to       review 
For the paper you turn in, place a sub-header for each of the following:
Article Summary – Briefly summarize the article in your own words. A summary is a description of the article and its findings – it is not an opinion of the article (that comes later).
Ethical, Social or Environmental consequences – Describe any ethical, social, or environmental consequences linked to your chosen topic.
Concepts, elements, or attributes of human cultures and/or inter-relationships – Explain concepts, elements, or attributes of human cultures and/or inter-relationships between humans and their environments and how it relates to your chosen topic within the chapter.  Minimum word count for this section is 200.
Perspective/Bias effects. –  Acknowledge how your perspective both informs and also limits your knowledge – with respect to how the article relates to the chapter. Minimum word count for this section is 100 words.
Reference – Author(s) name/Year of publication/Title of article/Name of Journal/Volume number and issue number and page numbers/Direct link to the article. If you do not provide the article information, you will receive a zero since your work cannot be verified. Include all of the information for the article in the following format so that the instructor can locate the article.
Complete this assignment in a Word document (.doc or .docx).
Your document must be typed in Times New Roman, 12-point font, and double spaced.
This is not a formatted APA paper. Therefore, no title page, running head, or abstract is required.
Do not use more than one direct quote. 

For this discussion, choose one of the following options: Explain the notion of

For this discussion, choose one of the following options:
Explain the notion of

For this discussion, choose one of the following options:
Explain the notion of “deep structure” in culture. Provide examples of deep structure institution.
List and explain two of the four reasons that family, community, and religion are so influential in all cultures.
Define family. Why is it important to culture?
List and explain the functions of family.
Using Phinney’s three-stage identity development model, explain how someone might develop an ethnic identity.

Assigned Readings: Chapter 3. Individual Differences Chapter 4. Individual Value

Assigned Readings:
Chapter 3. Individual Differences
Chapter 4. Individual Value

Assigned Readings:
Chapter 3. Individual Differences
Chapter 4. Individual Values, Perceptions, and Reactions
Overview:
In chapter three, we explore some of the key characteristics that differentiate people from one another in organizations. We first introduce the essential nature of individual differences and how people “fit” as individuals in organizations. We then look at personality frameworks that shed considerable light on different personality profiles. Next, we examine other specific personality traits and discuss different types of intelligence. We close this chapter with an examination of different styles for processing information and learning.
Chapter four continues the focus on individual behavior in organizations begun in Chapter three. Here, a discussion of attitudes examines how attitudes are formed and changed, cognitive dissonance, and three key work-related attitudes. Next, we look at how values and emotions affect organizational behavior. The role of perception, especially as it relates to issues of fairness and trust, is then discussed. Finally, our chapter concludes with a section devoted to stress in organizations—its causes and consequences and how it can be managed.
Learning Objectives:
Chapter 3. Individual Differences
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
Explain the nature of individual differences, the concept of fit, and the role of realistic job previews.
Define personality and describe general personality frameworks and attributes that affect behavior in organizations.
Identify and discuss other important personality traits that affect behavior in organizations.
Discuss different kinds of intelligence that affect behavior in organizations.
Describe different learning styles that influence how people process information and that affect behavior in organizations.
Chapter 4. Individual Values, Perceptions, and Reactions
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
Describe three important work-related attitudes, including how they are formed.
Define cognitive dissonance.
Describe the role and importance of values and emotions in organizational behavior.
Describe basic perceptual processes and how perception affects fairness, justice, and trust in organizations.
Discuss the nature of stress, including the basic causes and consequences and how it can be effectively managed.
Reflection and Discussion Forum Week 2
Reflection and Discussion Forum Week 2
Assigned Readings:
Chapter 3. Individual Differences
Chapter 4. Individual Values, Perceptions, and Reactions
Initial Postings: Read and reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Then post what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding in each assigned textbook chapter.Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion.
Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:
Do you think emotional intelligence is important to managers? How would you assess emotional intelligence in deciding who to promote to a managerial position?
[Your post must be substantive and demonstrate insight gained from the course material. Postings must be in the student’s own words – do not provide quotes!]
[Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review]
Submitting the Initial Posting:Your initial posting should be completed by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. EST. 
Response to Other Student Postings:  Respond substantively to the post of at least two peers, by Friday, 11:59 p.m. EST. A peer response such as “I agree with her,” or “I liked what he said about that” or similar comments are not considered substantive and will not be counted for course credit.
[Continue the discussion through Sunday,11:59 p.m. EST by highlighting differences between your postings and your colleagues’ postings. Provide additional insights or alternative perspectives]
Evaluation of posts and responses: Your initial posts and peer responses will be evaluated on the basis of the kind of critical thinking and engagement displayed. The grading rubric evaluates the content based on seven areas:
Content Knowledge & Structure, Critical Thinking, Clarity & Effective Communication, Integration of Knowledge & Articles, Presentation, Writing Mechanics, and Response to Other Students.