Atomic bomb essay outline
Research Question: Was the United States justified in using atomic bombs against Japan to bring World War One to an end?
Thesis Statement:
The United States was not justified in its decision to use the atomic bomb against Japan to end World War II.
The Japanese emperor considered negotiating an end to the war; a surrender was possible
Japanese records show that the involvement of the Soviets was the biggest factor that drove the Japanese to surrender, rather than the use of the Atomic bomb would lead to an international arms race a letter intercepted by the U.S. government showed a correspondence between two Japanese Officials that the emperor was worried about the destruction and sacrifice and wanted to bring the war to a swift ending
The Emperor would only negotiate if the U.S. and England were to reconsider their attitude toward “Unconditional Surrender”
Considering these two points, a peaceful negotiation was possible
A historian named Tsuyoshi Hasegawa found two records (dated 1945, August 6 and August 17) that the involvement of the Soviets was the bigger factor that had brought Japan to surrender rather than the use of the Atomic bomb
On June 11, 1945, the Franck report was submitted to the U.S. Secretary of War Stimson written by 6 scientists to examine the effect on society and politics the scientists reported that the demonstration of the bomb would create an arms race and weaken the future possibility of reaching an international agreement on nuclear weaponry
Conclusion: The end of World War II ended simultaneously with the unnecessary decision to use the atomic bomb, which came with alarming political and social implications, most importantly: the birth of the international nuclear arms race that had developed from a weapon of mass destruction to a weapon that threatens humanity as a whole.
Atomic bomb essay
Was the United States justified in using atomic bombs against Japan to bring World War One to an end?
The United States was not justified in its decision to use the atomic bomb against Japan to end World War II
First of all, the U.S. government claimed to have no other option to get Japan to surrender other than to make use of the atomic bomb, however, a letter between two Japanese high-ranking officials was intercepted by the U.S. government which indicated that Emperor Hirohito of Japan wanted to put a swift end to the war if the U.S. reconsidered its commands for an “unconditional surrender”. A negotiable peace could have easily taken place, giving no justification for the U.S. to drop the atomic bombs.
Second, in June, Manhattan Project scientists submitted the Franck Report to the U.S. Secretary of War as a warning which in its contents emphasized the effect that the use of nuclear bombs would have on politics and in society. The scientists warned if the atomic bomb was used, It would create a race for nuclear armaments and weaken the possibility of a future nuclear weapon agreement. They proposed an alternative way of scaring the enemy to surrender—by revealing the nuclear bombs in a demonstration in an uninhabited area.
Finally, a historian named Tsuyoshi Hasegawa discovered two records—both dated August 1945 (after the bombs were dropped)—which showed that the involvement of the Soviets was the ultimate factor that brought Japan to surrender and not the atomic bomb. This fact alone reinforces the argument that the U.S. was not justified in its decision to drop the atomic bombs.
The end of World War II ended simultaneously with the unnecessary use of the atomic bomb, which came with alarming political and social implications, and most importantly: the birth of the international nuclear arms race that had developed from a weapon of mass destruction to a weapon that threatened humanity as a whole.