Category: American history

Much of this book is based on popular music and American culture from 1945-1955.

Much of this book is based on popular music and American culture from 1945-1955. You will
write 4-6 page reflective essay on the following prompt:
To what extent was the Rock’n’Roll Movement a pivotal moment in U.S. history?
Think about this — What is the purpose of this book? What values can be seen through the
inception and reception of Rock’n’Roll music in the 1950s. How did Rock’n’Roll challenge and
change American culture and lay a foundation for the 1960s. Take a good look at the themes that
the author rolls out – sex, race, generational conflict, culture wars, etc.
Your essay should include a brief synopsis of the author’s thesis and main points, an analysis of
what the book adds to your knowledge of history. This prompt is an analysis not a summary. In
addition to the prompt, I would like for you to conclude your essay with an analysis of how you
believe this book would be good for use in the classroom. Is it good ancillary literature to the
textbook? Think about why the book was written or published.
Do not try to write this essay if you have not read the book in its entirety. I will grade your essay
based on its clarity, organization, content, and mechanics. It must exhibit correct spelling and
grammar and must be written at a collegiate level.
Your paper should be in Times New Roman, size 12 pt. font, and double spaced. You should
have 1-inch margins on all sides of the paper. It should include page numbers. You must
include an appropriate title page, no MLA headings. Paper must be in either APA or CMS
(Turabian).
Here are some helpful tips for your paper-
1) Your paper must have an argument. This argument should be clearly stated in the
introductory paragraph. An argument offers an explanation to a question, not just a general
statement. For example: “Writing history papers is stupid” may be your firm belief, but it is a
general statement and not an argument. Something better would be “Writing history papers is
stupid because I always wait until the last minute, I never complete the reading assignments on
time, and I always got A’s in high school- so why should I put any effort into this paper.” This is
an argument because it offers three explanations for why this imaginary student dislikes writing
history papers – (although I sense it will be a failing paper.)
2) Once you have a clearly stated argument, the rest of your paper should present the most
relevant evidence in support of that argument- not just information from the first half of the
chapter or the shortest documents. You want to persuade your reader that your argument is the
most convincing explanation to a particular question.
3) Express your ideas, explain your evidence, then analyze that evidence in careful detail. Do
not assume that I know what you intend to say- be sure you write exactly what you intend to say.
Do not leave your reader guessing. If I spend a great deal of time trying to figure out what you
are trying to say, that is not a good sign. Clarity is one of your best friends. Do not include “I
believe” or other use of your own voice- it’s your paper, we know it is what you believe.
4) Organize your paper so that it develops in some coherent fashion. Do not simply discuss
issues because you are currently reading that particular piece of evidence. A stream of
consciousness is no form of organization. If your paper is so confusing that it takes me longer to
read than took you to write, that is also not a good sign.
5) All paragraphs should begin with a strong topic sentence that lets the reader know exactly
what that particular paragraph will discuss. Then, each sentence in that paragraph should focus
on that topic sentence. If you have any sentences that do not deal with the topic sentence, they
should not be in the paragraph. You should be able to read each paragraph’s topic sentence and
see the logical progression of the paper.
6) The concluding paragraph should summarize the argument and the supporting evidence- but
it should not simply repeat the introductory paragraph. Many times, students do not even include
the concluding paragraph, so the reader is left guessing. This is a bad idea- your paper must have
a concluding paragraph.
7) Avoid the use of the Passive Voice. Whenever you see the verb “to be” (“was,” “were”),
rewrite the sentence to avoid the passive voice. For example: “The Declaration of Independence
was written by Thomas Jefferson” is passive voice because the subject (TJ) is after the verb (to
write). Most passive voice sentences can easily be fixed: “Thomas Jefferson wrote the
Declaration of Independence.” This is “active voice” because the person doing the action (TJ) is
the subject of the sentence. Writing in the active voice makes sentences much clearer and does
not bog down the paper in convoluted statements.
Another form of passive voice involves sentences that do not clarify the person doing the action.
For example: “My tuition will be raised 25-30%” is passive voice because we do not know who
is responsible for raising tuition. A better, clearer, statement would be: “As a result of the state
budget crisis, the Board of Regents will raise my tuition 25-30%.” Now we know who is
responsible for the action.
8) Avoid long quotations or repetitive use of quotations. While short and relevant quotes can go
a long way to help the paper, be sure that you are doing the writing and not letting the quotes
write the paper for you.
9) Your paper must be your own ideas written in your own words. If you take information from
any source, including the internet or another student, and claim it to be your own, you are guilty
of plagiarism, and you will be turned over to the dean for investigation. You will receive a 0 for
this paper. This also can lead to academic suspension. Do not risk it- just come up with your
own ideas and express them in your own words- it is not that difficult. In addition, the use of any
outside sources will result in a failing grade.
10) Do not wait until the last minute. Coming up with an argument and finding relevant
evidence takes time. If you wait until the last minute you will produce a poor paper and earn a
poor grade. Students always tell me they write better when under the pressure of a deadline.
You do not write better, you only write faster.
11) Finally, it is impossible to produce a good paper in the first draft. You must reread and
revise drafts to ensure that the argument is clearly stated, all of the best evidence is explained and
analyzed, paragraphs stay focused, the paper develops in a coherent fashion, sentences are
consistently written in the past tense and active voice, and you have a conclusion that
summarizes your argument and the supporting evidence without simply repeating the
introductory paragraph. If you submit only a first draft, you should expect a grade that reflects
your lack of effort.
You will submit the paper by Sunday, July 7th at 11:59 PM. No late papers will be accepted
since grades are due within a few days of the last week.
You will submit the paper to assignment dropbox.
Please only submit .doc or .docx files. No PDFs

A report of a minimum of 9 FULL pages (9 pages of text, exclusive of title pages

A report of a minimum of 9 FULL pages (9 pages of text, exclusive of title pages, notes, and bibliography), using Times New Roman, 12 pt. type, double-spaced, is due at the end of Week 8. It is to be based on your Research Paper Proposal.   It can be on any non-battle topic that happened in this, the most devastating of all of America’s wars.
Please include 
Introduction and Thesis Statement
Organization and Body of essay
Historical Analysis
Conclusion

The period of industrialization in the latter 1800s had a large impact on Americ

The period of industrialization in the latter 1800s had a large impact on American society. How did this time period’s economic or technological developments affect American policymakers’ desire to expand their influence outside of the United States?  How and why did this time period also influence individuals’ actions during the Progressive Era (1900-1920) in their attempts to reform societal issues?
Essays each week ought to be at least one page in length. This is using 12 point font, left and right indentations at 0, and double-spaced. You may put your name at the top of the document followed by a space before answering the question, but that is all that is required. Excessive indentation or spacing, larger font sizes, or otherwise messing with these settings will not result in full credit.

We often hear the term “national sovereignty.”  Discuss what this terms means an

We often hear the term “national sovereignty.”  Discuss what this terms means and whether is has a place in the world stage today. Select a specific example of attempts to apply this concept in practice and discuss whether it was a success or failure.  The example can be either national or international, past or present. 

Write a 2,000-2,500-word essay in response to the following prompt:
Select two c

Write a 2,000-2,500-word essay in response to the following prompt:
Select two civil rights organizations that were active during the 1950s and 1960s and craft an essay in which you compare how successful each group was in achieving its goals during the Civil Rights Movement. As you write, be sure to analyze both groups’ backgrounds and tactics and assess whether those factors influenced their ability to attain their goals. Finally, provide specific, detailed examples to support your claims and offer a conclusion that contextualizes the topic in relation to broader themes or issues in American history.
You may refer to the course material for supporting evidence, but you must also use at least two primary and three secondary sources and cite them using Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) format. If you use any Study.com lessons as sources, please also cite them in CMS (including the lesson title and instructor’s name).
Primary sources are first-hand accounts such as interviews, advertisements, speeches, company documents, statements, and press releases published by the company in question.
Secondary sources come from peer-reviewed scholarly journals, such as the Journal of Management. You may use like JSTOR, Google Scholar, and Social Science Research Network to find articles from these journals. Secondary sources may also come from reputable websites with .gov, .edu, or .org in the domain. (Wikipedia is not a reputable source, though the sources listed in Wikipedia articles may be acceptable.)

“It takes belonging to the privileged caste to view the universe as one’s own, t

“It takes belonging to the privileged caste to view the universe as one’s own, to consider oneself as guilty of its faults and take pride in its progress; those alone who are at the controls have the opportunity to justify it by changing, thinking, and revealing it; only they can identify with it and try to leave their imprint on it.”
– Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex
In February 1807, the New Jersey State Assembly became the last state in the U.S. to revoke women’s suffrage. Voting rights were then limited solely to white Protestant males who could provide property ownership. At the start of the 19th Century only 6% of the adult population could vote in the United States. The restrictions on women’s participation in government was an effort to appease Southern politicians who were concerned that New Jersey’s clause that allowed “all adult inhabitants” within the state to vote might also encourage slaves and “illegal aliens” (immigrants) to participate in elections in the South. In 1869 the Wyoming Territory would become the first region in the U.S. to reinstate women’s participation in government, sparking a chain of events that ultimately led to the passing of the 19th Amendment in 1920.
It should also be noted that the 19th Amendment did not give women the right tovote. Because the Constitution does not expressly deny any citizen this right. Instead this amendment made it illegal to restrict a person’s ability to vote based on their gender.
Almost one hundred years later, issues relating to gender inequality are still at the forefront of major social and political issues in the United States and around the world. This week we will look into the gender and social disparity in America through case studies that address the lives of significant leaders in the gender equality movement as well as dilemmas regarding the past and present history of gender disparity. 

This assignment focuses on the nature of American Citizenship and the also another essential aspect of how the American Empire of the late 19th century addressed the status of newly acquired territories such as Guam, Hawaii, The Philippines, and Puerto Rico. In your essay reflect on how far the social progress and voting rights of men and women at the turn of the century have been protected or denied. 
You are expected to choose any one of the following resources listed below and then submit a 300-500 word review of your selected documentary in the class discussion board. Throughout this course we will be dealing with a number of controversial topics where students are encouraged to express a multitude of perspectives and ideas which should be allowed to be openly discussed.
Write a 300-500 word reviewon your chosen source. Your documentary/podcast review should contain:
A very brief summary (no more than 50 words) that explains the premise of your chosen documentary.
In your opinion, who is the intended of your chosen media source? Do the content creators succeed or fail in connecting to this audience? 
Your response/reaction to the film. Here you can discuss the following:
What did learn and what you would like to learn more about? 
Did you enjoy the structure/presentation of your chosen media or did it fail to keep your attention? 
Were there any details that you found especially surprising or interesting? 
What perspective or point of view do the content creators take when presenting your chosen media? 
In your opinion is there a particular moral, political, or social ideology that your source is in on the side of? 
Are there any individuals or groups showcased in your media source in a positive or negative light? 
Do you feel that your source was balanced in presenting multiple perspectives, or mostly one sided? 
Discuss at least one place within your chosen source where the information/presentation could be improved. This can include: 
Describing at least one blind spot or missed opportunity your source could have addressed. 
Places where the content creators could have provided more information. 
Identify at least one instance of bias (a preference toward one point of view over another) that occurred in the documentary.
This could be from the way the film is presented, an explanation given by one of the experts interviewed, or the way the information is packaged.
Note: There will always be occurrences of bias in everything you watch in this class. Becoming aware of how a preferred point of view can inform the way a story is told is one of the primary goals of this course.
In order to earn full credit for the writing assignment: 
Include in your review at least one example from your reading of our American Yawp text that most closely relates to the ideas presented in your chosen documentary/podcast.
Connect what you’ve discovered in your chosen source to at least one idea or concept that we discussed during the pre-recorded lectures, slides, or your reading of the American Yawptext
Documentary:

Websites to use
https://www.npr.org/player/embed/891442022/891622642#
Book:
Chapter 16:

16. Capital and Labor

Chapter 19:

19. American Empire

Chapter 20:

20. The Progressive Era

I’ve created part of an outline, its jumbled and needs to be sorted. but most of

I’ve created part of an outline, its jumbled and needs to be sorted. but most of all i’m looking for a rough draft that I can touch up to sound more like me. anything helps

One of the main jobs of historians is to interpret the past by reviewing primary

One of the main jobs of historians is to interpret the past by reviewing primary documents, scholarly secondary sources, and then creating an analysis of this research. After reading your text and reviewing the assigned materials, submit an analysis of the Spanish Flu of 1918.  Beginning in 1918, an illness that came to be known as the Spanish Flu began making its way around the world and resulted in the deaths of over 25 million people worldwide.  You have lived your last 18 months through the current Covid pandemic. 
You might want to consider the following questions, but you are not limited to them:  How was the pandemic of 1918 different from typical cases of influenza and previous pandemics? How did it spread so rapidly? What can we learn from this event?  What did we learn from this event moving into the Covid pandemic?  What will historians and history students in the future learn from the Covid pandemic? 
This assignment should be at least 300 words and contain your reactions or questions about some specific issue within the historical narrative which you find compelling. For full credit, your paper must not simply sum up the reading or repeat points made there. Rather, I’m looking for you to create your own interpretation, explain the emotional content of the piece, or discuss some original insight. Include citations as needed.
Rubric
Interpreting the Past (6)
Interpreting the Past (6)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation
15 to >7.5 pts
Good job creating your own interpretation, explaining the emotional content of the piece, or discussing some original insight.
7.5 to >0.0 pts
Your work addressed the prompt but did not provide a detailed interpretation, explanation or discussion.
0 pts
Your work did not address the prompt or provide our own interpretation.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord count & logistics
5 to >2.5 pts
Your work met the appropriate word count of 300 words & provided citations for outside sources as needed.
2.5 to >0.0 pts
Your work had between 100-300 words or did not provide appropriate citations for outside sources as needed.
0 pts
Your work did not provide citations for outside sources or was under 100 words.
5 pts
Total Points: 20
PreviousNext

The article you will be discussing is below it is found in galileo.
Mason, Matth

The article you will be discussing is below it is found in galileo.
Mason, Matthew. “The Fire-Brand of Discord: The North, the South, and the Savannah Fire of 1820.” Georgia Historical Quarterly 92, no. 4 (Winter 2008): 443-459.
intructions-
Please give the source citation followed by triple spacing and then begin the article review.  The journal article review must be 11/2-2 pages in length (composed of no less than 25 sentences divided into no less than five paragraphs) discussing the reading topic as assigned in class.  Assignments must be typed and double-spaced with a font size of 12.  Reviews should focus on the topic and have a clear analysis.  The analysis should include the time period, place, target audiences (minimum of two), the author’s authority and objectivity, and finally, the article’s content. 
citation example-
Simmons, Gwendolyn Zoharah. “Living it Out: Martin Luther King Jr. Revisited.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 24, no. 2 (Fall 2008): 189-213.  (This journal article citation can’t be used for this assignment!)
Rubric Requiremnts-
– Turabian style citation 
-The author(s) is correctly identified in the review.  To establish the author’s authority, the review will mention at least three of the author’s specific credentials, such as their education (includes degree(s) earned subject, and institution), work experience (includes position/title and employer), and/or other publications (includes title(s) of articles (name of journal published in ) and books.
-Clearly identifies at least two specific audiences/groups targeted by the author.
-Clearly identifies the author’s subject in the review which includes the time period and place(s).  The student correctly and clearly identifies the author’s objectiveness or bias in the article.  The student’s objectivity  argument is easy to follow and is supported with evidence from the article
–

1. Now that you have studied the U.S. Constitution, go to this website: https://

1. Now that you have studied the U.S. Constitution, go to this website: https://www.constituteproject.org/?lang=en (Links to an external site.)
2. Find a copy of another country’s constitution (the current one) and read it. As you read it, pay attention to your reactions. What do you like? What don’t you like?
3. Read the U.S. Constitution, found in the text.
4. Write a paper that answers these three questions (please label each answer):
A. What two or three things to you most like about the U.S. Constitution?
B. What other country’s constitution did you analyze, and what two things do you most like about that document?
C. Compare and contrast the two constitutions.
Your answers to these three questions must be at least 150 words long each (so at least 450 total) .
5. Submit your written paper as a .rtf, .doc, or .docx file only. No other file types will be accepted. Submit your paper to the Constitution Assignment drop box. Poor grammar, spelling, and punctuation will lower your grade. Check your paper for errors. Remember to put your name on your paper.