GOVT 200 ECONOMICS ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW For this assignment

GOVT 200
ECONOMICS
ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
For this
assignment

GOVT 200
ECONOMICS
ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT
INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
For this
assignment, you will write a 2–3-page paper (double-spaced, 1-inch margins)
providing at least
1 example of how government has overstepped biblical principles in some form of economic policy. Be sure
to adhere to the format specified in the Course Style Guidelines document.
Options include the
following topics:
· A specific piece of
legislation relating to business regulation or taxation.
· The “party platform” of
either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party (or both).
· The role of the Federal
Reserve.
· The budget process.
In
discussing one of these topics, incorporate clear references from the Learn
material in the assigned
Module: Week.
INSTRUCTIONS
Follow
the below instructions to compose your assignment:
· Length of assignment –
2-3 pages.
· Make sure to include a
bibliography page
· Format of assignment –
Course Style Guidelines
· At least 2 sources
· Acceptable sources –
Scholarly articles published within the last five years, the Bible, online articles given as
assignments, and any other pertinent source that helps the student answer the assignment
prompt.
Note: You may submit your
assignment to the Economics Analysis: Draft Submission
Assignment to check your
paper for plagiarism. Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin
plagiarism tool. After reviewing your Turnitin results, make any edits
necessary and
submit your Economics Analysis: Final Submission Assignment.

There are competing historical interpretations about the U.S. decision to drop t

There are competing historical interpretations about the U.S. decision to drop t

There are competing historical interpretations about the U.S. decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Was the attack on Japan morally justifiable? Did it save lives by avoiding an invasion of Japan in November 1945? Were there other plausible alternatives to the use of atomic weapons and, if so, why were they not pursued?
Research the above topic and write an original research paper of 1,000 words or more. Present both sides of the argument and then express your opinion.
Other questions you might consider while researching and writing your essay are:
· Did Truman authorize the use of atomic bombs for political reasons—to intimidate the Soviets—or was his major goal to force Japan to surrender and bring the war to an early end?
· To what extent did subsequent justification for the atomic bomb exaggerate or misuse wartime estimates for U.S. casualties stemming from an invasion of Japan?
· Were the Japanese ready to surrender before the bombs were dropped? To what extent had Emperor Hirohito prolonged the war unnecessarily by not seizing opportunities for surrender?
· If the United States had been more flexible about the demand for “unconditional surrender” by guaranteeing a constitutional monarchy would Japan have surrendered earlier than it did?
· How greatly did the atomic bombings affect the Japanese decision to surrender?
· Was the bombing of Nagasaki unnecessary? To the extent that the atomic bombing was critically important to the Japanese decision to surrender would it have been enough to destroy one city?
· Would the Soviet declaration of war have been enough to compel Tokyo to admit defeat?
General Guidelines for a Research Paper
1. Be sure that your paper is 1,000 words, not including title page, notes or and bibliography, using standard one-inch margins, 12-point font Times New Roman and double spacing.
2. The paper should clearly answer the topic and state your opinion or position clearly. You should have a well-developed thesis or position, supported by evidence from sources that are cited in your bibliography.
3. You may present your paper in whichever style you are most familiar or comfortable in using (APA, Chicago, MLA, etc.)
4. Be sure to incorporate research from scholarly journals and internet sites that you find online or at your library.
5. Your bibliography should include at least three sources besides your textbook.
6. It must have a title page that includes your name and an appropriate title for your research paper.
7. The paper should express your ability to think critically about a topic and sources.
8. The paper should express your ability to combine information and ideas from different sources into a focused argument.
9. It is important that you use spell check and other grammar aids built into word-processing programs. Be sure to proofread the paper yourself and have someone read it before it is submitted, if possible.
10. Your final paper should be free of spelling, grammatical, stylistic and mechanical errors.
11. Although this is an opinion paper, avoid the use of first person (i.e. “I feel. . . .” or “In my opinion, . . . “)

Write at least 800 words disucssing the primary sources provided and how these d

Write at least 800 words disucssing the primary sources provided and how these d

Write at least 800 words disucssing the primary sources provided and how these documents emphasize the content in the assigned chapter readings 5-8 of the Give Me Liberty! textbook and other materials assigned for this module.
Avoid using contractions, use proper grammar and punctuation, and proofread your responses before submitting for clarity.
Consider the following questions when discussing the primary sources:
What motives prompted the author to write this?
What is the central argument being made by the author?
Who is the author’s intended audience?
Who or what is left out of the document–women, children, other minorities, other members of society?
In addition to the main subject, what other kinds of information can be obtained from the document?
How do the subjects of the document relate to what we know about broader society at the time in which the document was written?
What was the meaning of the document in its own time?
You will have to log in to my school account to view the assigned reading and textbook chapters required for the assignment. 

The DISCUSSION POST IS IN THE FILES. PLEASE LOOK AT FILE BEFORE STARTING, there

The DISCUSSION POST IS IN THE FILES. PLEASE LOOK AT FILE BEFORE STARTING, there

The DISCUSSION POST IS IN THE FILES. PLEASE LOOK AT FILE BEFORE STARTING, there is one discussion post. please use the readings and videos to complete the assignemnt. I could not find the reading online but please use that one. Also, make sure to usetransition words, and sound profession. Make sure spelling is correct and information is backed up sith context fro mthe video and readings. Make sure to have keypoints and answer every question in the discussion post. DO NOT ANSWER QUESTIONEERE. 
Zoe Leonard’s video, “I Want a Dyke for President” was written in the 1990s during the height of the HIV/AIDS pandemic – video 
Reading – Begin Broome, Punch Me Up to the Gods
Finding Out: pp. Xix- Chapter 1 “Before Identity
Also i attached the heterosexual questioneere as well. 

The Final Exam has two parts. Each part has separate prompts to answer, but both

The Final Exam has two parts. Each part has separate prompts to answer, but both

The Final Exam has two parts. Each part has separate prompts to answer, but both parts must be submitted together in the same file. The instructions for each part are listed below, along with the links and documents you will need to answer all of the prompts. Grades will be based on the content of your answers and must be more than 800 words in length (Each Part should be at least 400 words, for a total of more than 800 words for the whole exam). Direct quotes do not count toward the required word count. Submit your papers via the link below the instructions by the due date listed on the course calendar.
Part 1:
For Part 1 of the Final Exam, read George Washington’s Farewell Address (document 1 or 2, linked below). Using the address and the textbook (chapter 8), write an essay answering the prompts listed below.
Part 1 Documents:
There are two versions of George Washington’s Farewell Address linked below. Document 1 is a shorter version that I edited and saved in a Microsoft Word file.  Document 2 is the full version of his address in a .pdf file from the National Constitution Center (constitutioncenter.org). Either version is fine for this assignment.
Document1-WashingtonFarewell.docx
Document2-WashingtonFarewell-complete.pdf
Part 1 Prompts:
Remember to address ALL 6 PROMPTS in your answer.
What warnings does Washington provide about domestic politics in the United States?
What warnings does Washington provide about the United States’ relationship with other nations?
What advice does Washington give to Americans for avoiding these dangers?
In the address, Washington refers to two specific treaties with other nations that were completed during his administration. Which treaties does he refer to and how do they relate to his warnings and recommendations?
What other warnings does Washington provide in his address?
Do you think Washington’s warnings are still relevant today? Why, or why not?
Part 2:
For Part 2 of the Final Exam, read the following two documents. Then, using the documents, your lecture notes, and the textbook, write an essay answering all of the prompts below.
Part 2 Documents:
Document1-Douglass.docx
Document2-Lincoln.docx
Part 2 Prompts:
Remember to address ALL 5 PROMPTS in your answer.
Compare and contrast how each speech reflected ideas about American freedom and American identity in the 1850s and 1860s?
What inconsistencies does Frederick Douglass (Document 1) identify with the founding principles of the nation and the current status of people of African descent within it?
How does President Lincoln (Document 2) frame the Civil War and effort to restore the Union as a moral imperative?
Do you think Lincoln’s vision of “a new birth of freedom” for American society was intended to be an answer to (or even a solution for) Douglass’s criticism of American hypocrisy?
Do you think these speeches are still relevant today? Why, or why not?

Imagine a conversation between Woodrow Wilson and Helen Keller about the war. Wh

Imagine a conversation between Woodrow Wilson and Helen Keller about the war. Wh

Imagine a conversation between Woodrow Wilson and Helen Keller about the war. What arguments would each make and what might they say to support their positions? Who would you have agreed with and why?
This should be 2-3 pages (that means at least 2 full and up to 3 full pages) and make sure you are looking back at the content of the class so far to help support each of their arguments. 

Instructions: Cynthia Marin, this essay must be at least 1000 words. Please incl

Instructions:
Cynthia Marin, this essay must be at least 1000 words. Please incl

Instructions:
Cynthia Marin, this essay must be at least 1000 words. Please include a works cited page as well.
What constitutes an appropriate role for the judiciary? Some people argue that courts have become too powerful and that judges legislate from the bench. What does it mean for a court to be activist? What does it mean for a court to show judicial restraint? Although conservatives have long complained about the activism of liberal justices and judges, in recent years liberals have pointed out that conservative judges and justices are now more likely to overturn precedents and question the power of elected institutions of government. Conservatives counter by saying they are simply returning to an older precedent that had been ignored by liberals. If both liberals and conservatives engage in judicial activism, what is the role of the concept of “activism” (perhaps judicial activism is just a term used to describe a court decision you disagree with)?
Instructions for Writing Your Essay:
All essays must be written using proper English grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Points will be deducted for grammatical, punctuation, syntax, capitalization, etc. errors. Essays are automatically submitted to Turnitin. Work that Turnitin identifies as having more than a 10% rate of similarity (plagiarism) after quoted material and small matches (10 words or less) are excluded will not be read and will receive a grade of 0.

Identifications:  Answer 5 of the following 7 identifications. General Braddock’

Identifications:  Answer 5 of the following 7 identifications.
General Braddock’

Identifications:  Answer 5 of the following 7 identifications.
General Braddock’s Expedition                    
Battle of Saratoga
Valley Forge                                                  
Election of 1860                                            
The Vicksburg Campaign                              
Oliver Otis Howard                           
The Philippine Insurrection
Essays:  Answer 3 of the following 5 essay questions.  
1).  What were the causes of the French and Indian War?
2). What were some factors that contributed to colonial victory (or British defeat) during the American Revolution? 
3).  Secession was intensely debated in southern states in the winter of 1860 and 1861.  After reading the primary accounts of two Georgians, Alexander Stephens and Henry Benning, what were the arguments for secession (Benning) and for staying in the Union/against secession (Stephens)?  Cite each account in your answer.  These documents are available on Canvas under the “file” section of “mid term materials.”
4).  After reading the four documents on Sherman’s March to the Sea (these documents are available on Canvas under the “file” section of “mid term materials”), what do we learn about Sherman’s way of war?  How did he try to impose restrictions or limitations (if at all) on the conduct of the war in Georgia?  And what does the account from Dolly Lunt (a civilian) add to the story about Sherman’s Hard War approach?  In your answer cite at least 3 of the 4 documents.
5).  The Spanish-American War was fought in two theaters: the Philippine Theater and the Caribbean Theater.  What were some of the key highlights of the war in both theaters?

Assigned readings/video: 1) Antislavery sentiment and backlash (lecture material

Assigned readings/video:
1) Antislavery sentiment and backlash (lecture material

Assigned readings/video:
1) Antislavery sentiment and backlash (lecture material)
2) Frederick Douglass Narrative (For class purposes, read from Chapter 1 through the end of his time with Mr. Covey). 
3) Calhoun’s “Slavery is a Positive Good” speech
4) Kerry Washington reads Sojourner Truth
Discussion Questions: 
Give an example or two of anti-abolitionist violence in the 1830s. What is the significance of the both abolitionism and the backlash to ending slavery?
Provide specific examples from Douglass’s narrative that contradict Calhoun’s assertion the slavery is a “positive good.”
Describe Douglass’s final interactions with Mr. Covey. Why do you think I chose to end at this particular point in his narrative?
How does Calhoun justify slavery? How does this justification hide the reality of life for slaves?
Using the Foner text and/or Douglass’s narrative, give examples of different types of resistance to slavery.
Reflecting upon the assigned version of Sojourner Truth’s “Ain’t I a Woman” speech, describe her reasoning for gender equality.
– Antislavery sentiment and backlash (lecture material)
https://elearn.pstcc.edu/d2l/le/lessons/9714362/topics/98597929
– Frederick Douglass Narrative (for class purposes, read ch 1 through the end of his time with Mr. Covey)
https://www.ibiblio.org/ebooks/Douglass/Narrative/Douglass_Narrative.pdf
– Calhoun’s “Slavery is a Positive Good” speech

Slavery a Positive Good


– Kerry Washington reads Sojourner Truth