Category: American Colonies

The French Revolution created an era of enlightenment values that rose in France. These values brought an end to the ancien régime and lead to a more universal system being adopted, Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen de 1789 which is still used today. Despite only addressing the rights of men, Olympe de Gouges, predominantly one of the earliest French feminists produced a separate document designated for women. She also raised awareness against slavery, which Enlightenment thinkers would believe was a ridicule of Enlightenment values because French colonies were hierarchies of race with France at the top.

Before the Revolution, societies were perceived as corrupt with a system that only benefitted the aristocracy. At the top of the image, an eye is in the center of the light beams. This represents an all-knowing supreme being therefore the Declaration of Human Rights is universal and can be applied to everyone including the lower class. The light beams shining out illustrate the ultimate and faultless declaration that provides citizens with fundamental principles such as ‘men are born and remain free and equal in rights’. Enlighteners wanted to deconstruct the feudal system, so it was fairer towards everyone including peasants. They rejected society’s unjust laws leading to an equitable declaration.

On the left, a woman is wearing the same colors as the tricolor demonstrating that these ideas and values came from France which can be enforced throughout Europe and the world. During the 1780s, Enlightenment principles were traveling from France and revolutionizing European politics. Eventually, these ideologies of universal enlightenment traveled beyond Europe and settled in North America.

The woman on the right has wings suggesting that the declaration is a massive upheaval to flying towards new heights in life. This also relates to the liberté of the French motto established under the Third Republic. Therefore, the declaration is necessary for man to move forward gain knowledge, and become educated in the social and political aspects. The woman is also wearing pink. This color symbolizes universal harmony and peace which can be achieved by the declaration shown below her. The déclaration formed the foundation for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signifying the global, universal element of it. However, this is an exclusive form of universalism as it does not address women. Two years after the Declaration was published de Gouges created Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne.

De Gouges not only wanted women to have rights and an education but also for them to recognize their worth. During the reign of King Louis XIV, only ten percent of women living in the provinces knew how to write their signature. This highlights the scale of how many were given the right to an education. Madame Roland, a French writer supported de Gouges but for the wrong reasons, suggesting women should have an education in order to make men happy. In this sense, women were not free as they were still being seen to serve the superior sex. During the year when Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen was published, Roland wrote in a letter ‘they (women) shall only be able to act freely when the French will have earned the right to be called free men’. Thus, the declaration is not seen as universal, applying to men only. In de Gouges’ déclaration (left) it states that ‘woman is born free and is equal to man in her rights’. As this takes into account both men and women it can be argued this declaration is more universal. De Gouges also considered the place of illegitimate children within society. This declaration gives them freedom of thought and speech in a society where they would not have been recognized and instead shunned. De Gouges motivated women to free themselves as they had not gained much from the aftermath of the Revolution, unlike men. Despite her years of campaigning for equality, she was executed.

The image on the left is taken from a French newspaper titled ‘The Civilising Mission’. France wanted to educate and integrate inferior colonies in North Africa into a civilized country. This is represented by the woman in the form of a supreme being with light around her. We can see gold falling out, suggesting she is giving resources to places where there may not be as many valuable resources unlike in France. Behind her, we can see the sea. This demonstrates France has traveled south to North Africa. The supreme being in the form of France is wearing the tricolor and we can see a man on the right holding her red cloak may be yearning for the ideologies of France, the civilized nation with a moral code of conduct. This can be supported by the two men sitting down. One is holding the book and looking up perhaps admiring and respecting France’s civilised nation and their cultivated ideologies. Further in the back, we can see a man making a salute across the sea, to France perhaps expressing his gratitude. The universal déclaration aimed to educate the world not just France, however in doing so France was blind to the fact that other countries had their own cultures, histories, and values that couldn’t be changed. The French Revolution was unique to France’s history and the Enlightenment ideas that accelerated as a consequence were in a way solely ideas that fitted France’s perspective. Therefore, the déclaration may not be universal in this sense. Furthermore, France suffers from its colonial legacy today.

The Enlightenment era put forward new ideas that were prevalent in France and created a wave of ideologies across Europe. The déclaration reflects these values that were reinforced however the universal aspect did not target everyone such as women. Olympe de Gouges directly addresses a wider range of people. However, her version was criticized reinforcing women’s inferior position in society and rejecting the universal aspect. By spreading knowledge to colonies, France ignored other cultures’ values and traditions and implemented their ideas.

Introduction

The British colonial settlements in Virginia and New England played a significant role in shaping the early history of North America. Despite their common origin as British colonies, these regions developed distinct characteristics and experiences. This essay aims to compare and contrast the British colonial settlements in Virginia and New England, focusing on their establishment, economic activities, social structure, and religious influences.

Body

Establishment

The settlement of Virginia began with the founding of Jamestown in 1607. It was primarily driven by economic motives, such as finding gold and establishing profitable agricultural ventures. In contrast, the New England colonies, including Plymouth (1620) and Massachusetts Bay (1630), were established by religious dissenters seeking religious freedom and a purer form of worship. The Pilgrims and Puritans played a crucial role in the establishment of these settlements.

Economic Activities

Virginia’s economy was primarily based on agriculture, with tobacco cultivation emerging as the dominant cash crop. Large plantations with slave labor were established, and the colonists focused on exporting tobacco to Europe. In New England, the rocky soil and colder climate limited agricultural opportunities. Instead, the New England colonies relied on diverse economic activities such as fishing, shipbuilding, trade, and small-scale farming. They also developed a strong mercantile economy, engaging in trade with the West Indies and Europe.

Social Structure

The social structure in Virginia was hierarchical, with a wealthy planter elite at the top, followed by small farmers, indentured servants, and enslaved Africans at the bottom. The plantation system contributed to a distinct class divide and a reliance on slave labor. In New England, the social structure was more egalitarian, with a larger middle class consisting of small farmers, artisans, and merchants. The influence of Puritan values, such as the importance of community and shared responsibility, contributed to a more cohesive society.

Religious Influences

Religion played a significant role in both regions, but with different influences. Virginia had a predominantly Anglican (Church of England) establishment, with the colony’s leaders maintaining close ties to the Church. Religious practices were less strict, and individual religious beliefs varied. In contrast, the New England colonies were strongly influenced by Puritanism, which emphasized a strict interpretation of biblical teachings and communal religious practices. The Puritans sought to establish a “city upon a hill” as a model society based on their religious beliefs.

Interactions with Native Americans

The relationship between the British colonists and Native Americans differed in Virginia and New England. In Virginia, conflicts with Native American tribes, such as the Powhatan Confederacy, were prevalent as colonists encroached on Native lands and sought to expand their plantations. In New England, initial interactions were characterized by tensions, but eventually, some tribes, such as the Wampanoag, formed alliances with the colonists for trade and protection against rival tribes.

Conclusion

The British colonial settlements in Virginia and New England exhibited distinct characteristics that shaped their development and legacies. Virginia’s focus on tobacco cultivation, hierarchical social structure, and Anglican religious influence contrasted with New England’s diversified economy, more egalitarian social structure, and strong Puritan religious values. These differences reflect the varying motivations and aspirations of the colonists and shaped the long-term trajectories of the regions. Understanding the contrasting experiences of the British colonial settlements in Virginia and New England provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics of early American history.

Currently, smoking is considered an epidemic that infiltrates societies around the world. It is looked down on by first world countries, and it is known to be a practice that is harmful to the body, causing many fatal diseases, such as lung cancer. However, this negative view of tobacco was not always held in the past. For much of American history, tobacco and the cigarette industry held an essential role in the American economy, starting from the colonial times. However, new scientific evidence in the latter part of the 20th century debased cigarette companies, leading to the rise of e-cigarettes. Throughout American history, society’s view of tobacco changed as scientific evidence proved it harmful to one’s health.

In 1619, John Rolfe perfected the cultivation of tobacco in Virginia. From the beginning of his colonization, Rolfe thought that Virginia would be a good location to grow tobacco. However, people said that Virginia Tobacco was not as good as those coming from the Caribbean. Therefore, Rolfe grew tobacco imported from the West Indies, and it became an almost instant success. Just a little over a decade later, 1.5 million pounds were being exported from the Virginia colony every year. By the end of the century, In England alone, on average, every person was smoking two pounds of tobacco every year. By then, other colonies in America, mainly the ones in the south, also started to take on the business of exporting of this cash crop. There was actually such a large supply of tobacco that tobacco prices started to deflate. However, instead of controlling the supply, farmers in the colonies grew increasing amounts of tobacco to make up for the decreasing prices. This in turn started a chain reaction; because prices dropped, farmers had to grow more, which made them look for more land. With all the new land came the need for more labor to work the fields.

Tobacco was not only an essential part of the economy in colonial times, but its influence reached far into the lives of everyone in the colonies. It even penetrated into the religious aspects of colonial life. According to the Virginia Blue Laws, If you fail to attend church for a week, then the penalty is 1 lb of tobacco, and if absent for a month, the fine is 50 lbs. In many colonies during this time period, attendance to the church was an important aspect to the colonists’ lifestyle. The fact that it was made up by tobacco shows the value of it. Because fines to the church could be paid in this plant, tobacco is being treated almost as a kind of currency, which emphasizes its indispensable role to the economy.

Although there were some slaves in the colonies in the 17th century, they were too expensive. The population of the colonists grew too slowly to provide a growing workforce and the Native Americans died too quickly from diseases to be a reliable source of labor. Therefore, colonists started looking to the multitude of poor people in the mother country. Advertisements in England enticed these poor people with opportunities to start a new life if they came to the Americas and gave a few years of labor. After their service, they would recieve freedom dues which would allow them to live self sufficiently. This may seem reasonable from the outside and many people from England were lured into this bargain. As a matter of fact, indentures who were transported to the New England colonies and the Quakers were treated humanely and also had many opportunities for their future after freedom. However, conditions in the Colonies were sometimes extremely harsh. Especially in the South, under extreme working conditions, many indentures died before they finished their term of service. In addition, because they lacked incentives for their work, servants were unmotivated and masters threatened them with increased term of service in order to keep them working hard. This practice of indentured servitude continued for a few decades until the overpopulating former indentured servants couldn’t find any left over land to settle down and live after freedom. This eventually resulted in an uprising of angry indentured servants, known as Bacon’s rebellion. In addition to this, former indentures also started growing tobacco and selling them on their own. This created competition in the market. Because of these factors, landowners eventually turned to slaves because they were to give their labor for their lifetime and they were easier to control.

Long after the colonial era, whether it was through smoking in a pipe, or with cigarettes, tobacco continued to be an essential industry in America. Much like in the 1600s, tobacco continued to dominate the American economy in the next few centuries. Throughout the span of this period, people were still oblivious to the fact that smoking posed a serious health hazard.

In the beginning of the 20th century, cigarette businesses were booming with success. From the late 19th to the early 20th century, tobacco accounted for 1.4% of the total country’s GDP and it was nationally the fourth largest cash crop. In some states such as Virginia and Maryland, it ranked first. There were little regulations against buying this common good therefore, everyone was able to smoke. During this time, people had no idea of the risks they were taking with each cigarette they smoked. Not only was tobacco considered harmless, but it was thought to have good effects on the body. Thomas Hariot, a colonist who wrote a report on Virginia, made a comment on tobacco in his report, saying “The fumes purge superfluous phlegm and gross humors from the body by opening all the pores and passages. Thus its use not only preserves the body, but if there are any obstructions it breaks them up.” These sentiments on this crop predisposed people in the future to smoke freely without blinking twice. Even well into the 1960s, cigarettes were still receiving large amounts of media publicity. It was not uncommon to see athletes, radio, TV and movie stars, and even doctors, to be seen smoking or advertising cigarette companies. Companies were also common sponsorers of popular TV shows on all the large TV networks. It seemed like tobacco would continue to be part of the American culture for a long time to come.

Although the vast majority of people up till the 1960s thought that smoking was harmless or beneficial to one’s health, even in colonial times, some people got the idea that smoking is harmful to one’s health, spirit, or mentality. For example, King James I said in a document that smoking was “A custome lothsome to the eye, hatefull to the Nose, harmefull to the braine, dangerous to the Lungs”. Like King James I, some were shown to be skeptical about this new crop that everyone enjoyed smoking. They were making claims about the harm that this plant can have on people. However, their claims went disregarded until the latter part of the 1900s. In 1957, evidence started to appear that suggested that smoking could be harmful to the body. The main claim was that smoking was a cause of lung cancer. This led the sale of tobacco to decline until companies advertised ‘filtered cigarettes’ which they claimed to be less harmful, and customers flocked to buy these ones over the old cigarettes. However, the claims that these filtered cigarettes were harmless were just a hoax; they provided little improvement. Therefore, these ‘improved’ smoking devices were just a way for companies to continue to raise revenue.

Despite these attempts to assuage the public about cigarettes, the companies realized they had to take action as an overwhelming amount of evidence continued to point at tobacco as a cause of lung cancer. Companies hired doctors and professors to defend them and argue that the scientific evidence was false. However, after the General Surgeon’s report in 1964, which convicted smoking as a cause of cancer, smoking rates inevitably fell. A common pattern was that people of high social class smoked less and less, while the people of the poorer class continued to smoke a lot. This is why many people today associate smoking with the lower classes of society.

A large dilemma faced by the country at this time was that despite the fact that smoking was harmful, cigarettes was still an essential part of an economy. Therefore, if people were to suddenly stop smoking, a large part of the US GDP would suddenly disappear. Politicians who thought the economic issues were more important than health issues argued that restricting advertising and sale of cigarettes would affect the factory workers, farmers, advertisers, sellers, and cities, such as Richmond, Virginia, all in a negative way. This shows how deeply embedded the tobacco industry is in many aspects of America. Although people might have agreed that smoking was harmful to people’s health, they could do little as undermining this industry would most likely have disastrous effects on the economy. In this way, people supporting cigarette companies could use this as leverage to justify that the cons that come with restricting cigarette sales would outweigh the pros. Something else that cigarette companies did to preserve their customers was to hide scientific evidence pointing to smoking as a cause of cancer. Even though companies knew about the harms of smoking, they would rather endanger the lives of many than to lose money. This is one of the examples of moral corruption that is associated with the tobacco industry as a result of greed and money.

Despite companies’ efforts to preserve their cigarette industries, as time went on, cigarette boxes had to have warning labels on them, tobacco soon became looked down upon, and the industry eventually declined. More public spaces forbade smoking in their areas, discouraging smoking in society. A poll in 1966 asked people if they thought that smoking was a cause of lung cancer. Only 40% said that it was a major cause. However, when the question was asked again in 2001, 71% recognized it as a major cause. Another example of the changing public view of tobacco was that in 1980, 37% considered smoking an addiction. In 2002, this number rose to 74%. Throughout the 1960’s to early 2000’s, companies were starting to face lawsuits and they had to deal with them sooner or later.

In 1997, delegates from the five most prominent tobacco companies gathered to deal with the 300 billion dollars in lawsuits that had accumulated over the past 25 years. In addition to paying 200 billion over the next 25 years, the companies agreed to put sufficient warnings on cigarette labels and finance anti-smoking activities, such as athletics. They drafted the Tobacco Manufacturer’s Settlement, in which these companies agreed to put restrictions on the sale of cigarettes. In the preamble, companies stated problems to society posed by cigarettes, which included the fact that a generation of adults and children are now dependent on cigarettes and previous restrictions on cigarettes failed to curb adolescent tobacco and drug use. People might have thought that increasing restrictions on the sale and the introduction of athletic programs and scholarships from cigarette companies would solve the nationwide problem of smoking. Despite these regulations, underage smoking continued to be a problem and it would also be a precedent for future problems that carry into modern times.

While it seemed as if the threat of smoking was gone after the plentiful restrictions, prospective cigarette companies introduced electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, which they claimed to have little to no health risks. In 1967, Herbert Gilbert patented the e-cigarette, which replaced the burning paper with vaporized air, hence the common name, vape. Even though nicotine was still being inhaled, a study in 2008 found that e-cigarettes were 100 to 1000 times less harmful than traditional cigarettes, deeming e-cigarettes a good alternative. The next year, Jordan’s Ministry of Health found that the e-cigarettes in fact had more toxic chemicals in addition to nicotine. As a result, the FDA banned the importing of e-cigarettes into America. With the introduction of e-cigarettes, an example of a toxic substance that people did not have to worry about before is vape flavors. There are thousands of vape flavors in the market and many of them can cause respiratory issues and other problems. According to the CDC, e-cigarettes resulted in 55 deaths and 2506 hospitalizations in 2019 alone. Despite these statistics, e-cigarettes is a continuing problem in the US.

Recently, a company has dominated the e-cigarette news: Juul. This company sells vaping devices which are infamous for looking like a harmless USB drive. In 2019, Illinois became one of many states to sue Juul. The lawsuit states that Juul attracts young customers with the sleek design and the variety of flavors it provides. By accusing Juul of targeting teens as customers, the company is accused of undoing years of work done previously to lower rates of adolescent smoking. The prevalence of nicotine addiction through Juul extends to most if not all schools and vapes are now almost a commonplace item in highschools. Juul has contributed in drastically increasing the number of highschool e-cigarette users in just a span of three years. In 2017, when Juul was made into a company, 11% of highschoolers regularly used e-cigarettes. In 2018, the number rose to 21%, and in 2019, 27.5% of highschoolers regularly used e-cigarettes. That is over a quarter of highschoolers in the country or around 4 million students, all of whom are susceptible to serious health problems in the future, severely crippling a whole generation of Americans. Although Juul might claim that it is trying to provide an alternative to smoking traditional cigarettes, studies show that people who Juul are actually more likely to start smoking cigarettes in the future. The dependence on nicotine at a young age can also make teens more likely to use other drugs and alcohol habitually. With the health problems come negative mental effects. Vaping for teens can cause lack of focus, which has a large negative impact on how well students do at school. It also can lead to symptoms of anxiety and depression.

In order to fight this epidemic, highschools now often have programs that spread awareness to younger people about drugs so they could say no to it before it is too late. In social media, there are now a flood of advertisements that show the dangers of vaping and its impact. All these efforts are put in as retaliation to this statistical rise in teen vapers.

Smoking tobacco was a practice that prevailed throughout American history, starting with its introduction in the colonial era. This cash crop soon escalated into a massive industry that supported the economy for years. It was only in the 1960s that people started realizing that there were health issues that came with smoking. As a result of the overwhelming scientific evidence pointing to smoking as a cause of cancer, cigarette sales declined rapidly and lawsuits were filed against cigarette companies. However, a new era of cigarettes came with the invention of e-cigarettes, which were said to be harmless compared to traditional paper cigarettes. Soon, people were still finding health problems related to e-cigarettes. Despite this, with the introduction of Juul, more high school students started vaping than ever, becoming addicted to the nicotine. This addiction not only causes health related problems, but also mental issues such as depression. As the US continues to fight back against addiction even throughout the 21st century, no matter which way one looks at it, it seems to be clear that King James was right centuries ago when he said that smoking was a harmful practice.

Works Cited

1. Brandt, Allan M. The Cigarette Century: the Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America. Place of publication not identified: Perseus, 2009, 21.
2. Cummings, K. M., and R. N. Proctor. “The Changing Public Image of Smoking in the United States: 1964-2014”. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 23, no. 1 (January 2014): 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0798.
3. “E-Cigarettes: Facts, Stats and Regulations”. Truth Initiative. Accessed January 4, 2020. https://truthinitiative.org/research-resources/emerging-tobacco-products/e-cigarettes-facts-stats-and-regulations.
4. Hariot, Thomas, and Paul Royster. “A Brief and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia (1588)”. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska – Lincoln. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/etas/20/.
5. “Historical Timeline of Electronic Cigarettes”, CASAA, November 18, 2019. http://www.casaa.org/historical-timeline-of-electronic-cigarettes/.
6. “Indentured Servants.” ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.ushistory.org/us/5b.asp.
7. James I. “A Counterblaste to Tobacco”, BLASTE , King James I of England, A Counterblaste to Tobacco. Accessed January 4, 2020. https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/james/blaste/blaste.html.
8. Maxouris, Christina. ‘Illinois sues Juul, alleging it targeted minors with its sleek, easily concealed e-cigarette”, CNN, December 12, 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/12/us/illinois-juul-lawsuit/index.html
9. Pampel, Fred C. Tobacco Industry and Smoking. New York: Facts On File, An imprint of Infobase Pub., 2009.
10. Patrick, Leslie, and Sharon V. Salinger. ‘Indentured Servitude’. Colonization and Settlement, Third Edition. Facts On File, 2017. Accessed January 9, 2020. online.infobase.com/Auth/Index?aid=17325&itemid=WE52&articleId=211548.
11. Swartz, Beth S. ‘Tobacco Lawsuits’. Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. Facts On File, 2005. Accessed January 3, 2020. online.infobase.com/Auth/Index?aid=17325&itemid=WE52&articleId=167778.
12. “The Growth of the Tobacco Trade” ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association. Accessed January 5, 2020. https://www.ushistory.org/us/2d.asp.”
13. “The History of E-Cigarettes: Electronic Cigarettes the Past, Present and Future: CE Course”. The History of E-cigarettes | Electronic Cigarettes the Past, Present and Future | Continuing Education Course. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.dentalcare.com/en-us/professional-education/ce-courses/ce451/the-history-of-e-cigarettes.
14. “Tobacco Manufacturers’ Settlement”. American History. Accessed January 9, 2020. online.infobase.com/Auth/Index?aid=17325&itemid=WE52&primarySourceId=5109.
15. Vaidya, Anuja. “Claim That Vaping Is ‘95% Less Risky’ than Smoking Cigarettes Is Misleading, Experts Say: A Common Claim, That Use of e-Cigarettes Is”. Becker’s Hospital Review. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/population-health/claim-that-vaping-is-95-less-risky-than-smoking-cigarettes-is-misleading-experts-say.html.
16. “Virginia Blue Laws”. Infobase Learning – Login. Accessed December 5, 2019. https://online.infobase.com/HRC/Search/PrimarySourceDetails/2?primarySourceId=3893&q=tobacco colonial.

The American Revolution shaped this country into what it is today. American rights, freedoms, and liberties would not be as they are today if it were not for the revolution. Great Britain had amounted a lot of debt after the French and Indian War. So, as a method to help lessen at least some of the amount they owed, they expected the American colonies to share their costs. Starting in 1763, The British installed a series of acts for taxing the colonies. Even though it was not the worst thing they could have done, considering they helped defend the colonies during the French and Indian War, several colonists were irritated at the taxes. The revolution was caused by King George III’s attempt to raise his country’s revenues by taxing the colonies, which brought protesting by the colonists, who were unhappy with their lack of representation in the government. The colonial resistance brought violence when 5 colonists were shot and killed by English soldiers, in what was known as the Boston Massacre. Even though some colonists, before the war, believed that fighting would be the last resort, this was very clearly not the case for the historic war that started this country. The American Revolution had a total of thirty-seven thousand three hundred twenty-four deaths. This might seem like a small number, compared to the number of deaths in more modern wars, and indeed, it is. The American Revolution lacked as many deaths as other revolutions. This is because of the weaponry used in this war for freedom from the English.

Although thirty-seven thousand three hundred twenty-four deaths sounds like a big number, the population of the colonists was at about 2.5 million, in which half a million of that number were slaves. This means that out of the whole population in the colonies, this war took about 1.5% of the lives of the colonists. Although this number looks big, it is rather small compared to other wars fought around this time. The primary weapon used in the war was the muzzleloading flintlock musket, along with its attached bayonet. To load the musket, soldiers opened their cartridge boxes, grabbed a cartridge, bit off the end to expose the powder, and poured small amounts into the pan of the lock. They would then close the pan, drop the cartridge into the barrel, remove their rammers, ram it home, return their rammer, and then cock their locks and aim the weapons at the enemies. There were no sights in these guns, just the bayonet lug near the muzzle. The soldiers would just look down the barrel. Soldiers were expected to be able to fire a shot every fifteen seconds for at least four minutes before needing to slow down due to the fouling in the barrel. These guns took a noticeable amount of time to get loaded up and be ready for battle. In addition to its loading speed, the muskets used in the American Revolutionary War used lead balls as its ammunition. As these balls were fired from the musket, they would often come out of the barrel spinning, looking somewhat like a curveball. With the loading time of the musket and the fact that these balls would curve when being fired, to compensate for inaccurate shooting, soldiers would often fire volleys, sending a larger number of balls toward the enemy, in the hopes of at least some of them hitting. In order to fire volleys in unison, soldiers would form into units of two to three ranks, or lines, that were shoulder to shoulder. The units operated like machines, lead by an officer, who would give the orders to load their guns, fire their guns, and move, when necessary. Units could easily turn their lines, move into columns or squares, advance, or turn about, at the direction of their officers. Even though these volleys would fire in mass, the speed of these weapons was extremely slow compared to other weapons. The muskets used in the war were expected to shoot once every fifteen seconds. Adding that fact to the fact that the bullets would not shoot straight and would go out of the barrels being like curveballs explain why the number of deaths was lower than other wars.

The American Revolution was something that completely changed and shaped what is now called the United States of America. It is something that will always and forever be in our history. The outcome of this war was the best possible outcome because it helped build this country. Though seemingly high, the number of deaths in the American Revolutionary War against Britain was relatively low compared to other wars. This is because the weapons used in the combat of these wars were slow and inaccurate. This war will be in lives forever.

Throughout the eighteenth century, we saw a lot of changes happening not just in Europe but also in North American colonies. Politics, freedom of speech, racial segregation, and religion was among this movement.

Politics were starting to re-develop in North America and have a more democratic quality to them if compared to Great Britain, as demonstrated in ‘The Independent Reflector on Limited Monarchy and Liberty’. People had more freedom to express themselves through magazines, newspapers, etc. knowing that their words would now be reaching more audiences. The revolution expanded the ‘freedom of speech’ to where now the low class was able to give their political point of view and create a debate of it with others. The ‘public sphere’ was seen as an essential part of democracy. But ‘freedom of speech’ had its limits, especially during this era. As demonstrated on ‘The Trial of John Peter Zenger’ in 1735. John Peter Zenger was a German ‘born-printer’, who used his newspaper, the ‘Weekly Journal’, to criticize and point out the New York City’s governor for corruption and tyranny acts. Ruining the reputation of a government official, during this time, was against the law which is why he was sent on trial. But, was acquitted thanks to his attorney that convinced the jury not to judge Zenger by the defamation against the governor but to consider the true facts that he exposed about the governor.

By the mid-eighteenth century, we observe a clearer line between racial ideology where it becomes more settled that Africans, in their point of view, were meant to be ‘slaves’ and white people were seen as ‘free’. In ‘Advertisements for Runaway Slaves and Servants’, we observe how African slaves would run away to try to get to colonies like Pennsylvania to find refuge from their owners. This action of running away expressed their desire for freedom.

Religion, in many ways, was becoming more formal and less personal throughout this century. And then we learn of a revolution that encouraged ordinary people to make a personal connection instead of relying on ministers. This movement was called the Great Awakening, and it started in the colonies during the 1730s. In ‘The Great Awakening Comes to Connecticut’ (1740) we learn of a minister called George Whitefield who had a significant impact preaching his message not just to ordinary white people but also African slaves and native Americans during the Great Awakening. His charismatic approach reached thousands of people during his sermons helping them convert back to Christianity.

In conclusion, we can point out that one of the most significant changes during the eighteenth century was the separation between government and religion because of all of the conflicts it carried out as they learned from Europe. To the extent that this separation was included in the Bill of Rights and as a result, it contributes to the many other changes on the social aspects and political participation in the colonies.

Introduction

The establishment of the Chesapeake and New England colonies marked a pivotal moment in American history. These two regions were among the first English settlements in North America, but they developed distinctively different societies. While there were notable differences, there were also some similarities between the Chesapeake and New England colonies. In this essay, we will explore the similarities and differences between these two regions, shedding light on their social, economic, and political characteristics.

Geographic and Demographic Factors

Both the Chesapeake and New England colonies were situated along the eastern coast of North America, but they differed in terms of geography. The Chesapeake region, encompassing present-day Virginia and Maryland, had a warmer climate, fertile soil, and navigable rivers, which facilitated agriculture and trade. In contrast, the New England colonies, including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire, had a colder climate, rocky soil, and limited natural resources.

In terms of demographics, the Chesapeake colonies attracted a large number of young, single male settlers who sought economic opportunities, primarily in tobacco farming. This led to a gender imbalance and a less stable family structure. In contrast, the New England colonies attracted more families and religious groups seeking religious freedom and establishing tight-knit communities.

Economic Activities and Labor Systems

The economies of the Chesapeake and New England colonies diverged significantly. In the Chesapeake region, the cultivation of tobacco emerged as the primary economic activity. Large plantations with indentured servants and later enslaved Africans formed the basis of the labor system. The focus on cash crop agriculture led to an agrarian society with a hierarchical structure.

In the New England colonies, the rocky terrain and limited arable land made large-scale agriculture challenging. Instead, the economy revolved around diverse industries such as fishing, shipbuilding, trade, and later manufacturing. The labor system in New England was characterized by small family farms, skilled artisans, and a greater emphasis on education and literacy.

Religious and Social Structures

Religion played a significant role in both the Chesapeake and New England colonies, albeit in different ways. The New England colonies were founded by Puritan dissenters seeking religious freedom and establishing communities based on their strict religious beliefs. The Puritans placed great emphasis on education, establishing schools and universities to educate the population.

In the Chesapeake colonies, the Church of England was the dominant religious institution, but religious fervor was less pronounced compared to New England. However, the Anglican Church played a central role in the social and political structures of the Chesapeake colonies, reinforcing the hierarchical nature of society.

Conclusion

Despite their differences, the Chesapeake and New England colonies shared some similarities. Both regions were English settlements in North America, and they faced similar challenges in establishing colonies in a new and unfamiliar land. They also encountered interactions with Native American populations and dealt with the uncertainties and hardships of colonial life.

However, the economic, social, and religious differences between the Chesapeake and New England colonies shaped their development and contributed to distinct societies. The Chesapeake colonies relied heavily on tobacco farming, had a more hierarchical social structure, and were less focused on education and religious pursuits compared to the New England colonies.

By understanding the similarities and differences between these two colonial regions, we gain valuable insights into the complexities of early American history. The Chesapeake and New England colonies laid the foundation for the diverse and evolving nation we know today. Recognizing the factors that shaped their development allows us to appreciate the rich tapestry of American history and the diverse legacies of its early settlements.

Introduction

The Chesapeake and New England Colonies were two distinct regions established by English settlers in North America during the 17th century. Despite their shared origin, these colonies developed unique characteristics and experienced different social, economic, and political structures. In this essay, we will compare and contrast the differences between the Chesapeake and New England Colonies, focusing on their settlement patterns, economies, religious practices, and social structures.

Settlement Patterns

The Chesapeake Colonies, including Virginia and Maryland, were primarily established for economic reasons. The settlers in this region were motivated by the prospects of wealth and landownership. Consequently, the Chesapeake Colonies witnessed a large influx of young, male settlers who sought opportunities in tobacco cultivation and other cash crops. The settlement patterns were characterized by scattered plantations and large landholdings, with a significant emphasis on individual landownership.

In contrast, the New England Colonies, such as Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire, were founded with a focus on religious freedom and the establishment of Puritan communities. Families and religious groups migrated to New England in search of a place to practice their faith freely. The settlement patterns in New England were characterized by compact towns and villages, communal land usage, and a strong sense of community.

Economies

The economies of the Chesapeake and New England Colonies differed significantly. In the Chesapeake, the economy revolved around agriculture, with tobacco as the primary cash crop. Plantations in the region relied heavily on the labor of indentured servants and later enslaved Africans. Large-scale agricultural production dominated the Chesapeake economy, and the focus was on exporting tobacco for profit.

In contrast, the New England Colonies had a more diversified economy. The rocky soil and colder climate of the region made large-scale agriculture challenging. Instead, the New Englanders turned to other industries, such as fishing, shipbuilding, trade, and manufacturing. The presence of forests and access to natural resources allowed for the development of timber and naval industries. Additionally, trade with the West Indies and Europe played a significant role in the New England economy.

Religious Practices

Religion played a central role in the lives of the settlers in both regions, but the religious practices differed. In the Chesapeake, the dominant religion was Anglicanism, which was enforced by law in Virginia and Maryland. However, the religious fervor was not as pronounced as in New England, and the Chesapeake Colonies exhibited more religious diversity and tolerance.

In contrast, the New England Colonies were established by Puritans seeking religious freedom and a strict adherence to their interpretation of Christianity. The Puritans emphasized a disciplined and communal approach to religion, with town churches at the center of community life. Dissenting religious views were often not tolerated, and the Puritan church held significant influence over social and political affairs.

Social Structures

The social structures in the Chesapeake and New England Colonies also differed. The Chesapeake Colonies had a hierarchical social structure based on wealth and landownership. Large planters and wealthy elites held significant power and influence, while indentured servants and enslaved Africans occupied lower social positions. The society was divided into distinct social classes, and social mobility was limited.

In contrast, the New England Colonies had a more egalitarian society. Although there were still distinctions based on wealth, the focus on communal living and the shared hardships of the region fostered a sense of equality among the settlers. Town meetings provided opportunities for political participation and decision-making, and a strong sense of community and cooperation permeated New England society.

Conclusion

The Chesapeake and New England Colonies were distinct regions with different settlement patterns, economies, religious practices, and social structures. The Chesapeake Colonies focused on economic pursuits, particularly tobacco cultivation, while the New England Colonies prioritized religious freedom and community-building. The Chesapeake had a predominantly agrarian economy with a hierarchical social structure, while New England had a more diversified economy, a strong religious influence, and a more egalitarian social structure.

Understanding these differences helps us recognize the diverse experiences and influences that shaped the early English colonies in North America. Despite their variations, both regions played crucial roles in the establishment and development of the American colonies, setting the stage for the future United States of America.

England and France’s colonial endeavors and their interactions with native Americans reflected their social and economic motives for colonization. New France’s goal of profiting off creating Catholic missions amongst native Americans required partnerships with them. England’s frosty relationship with its native American neighbors reflected their insular goal of creating colonies with a puritanical worldview. When analyzing England and France’s motives for violent encounters against native Americans, it becomes clear that France viewed violence as a cost of doing business while England viewed it as a form of justice and retribution.

The Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay colonies grew more populous and wealthier than New France because they afforded unique opportunities not available to the common individual in the Old World. Overall the motives for colonization play a major role in shaping each colony’s structure and its eventual success or failure.

The New England Confederation was established by four of the colonies to generate a path to colonial unification after England did not act to assist the colonists to defend the territory claimed by the colonists in any manner. The New England colonies differed from the Chesapeake colonies because the New England colonies had very skilled and prosperous people and their people could pay their own way. New England was more balanced with their sexes, they had 6 males for every 4 women, unlike the Chesapeake colonies where it was 4 men for every woman. The initial immigrants came as families and not as people, setting the population to grow amazingly stable and healthy. Although, not all the same as the other colonies, females had very distinct social privileges and positions that permitted them to thrive and not feel down the social line.

New England was a patriarchally structured Society. New Englanders devoted to family solidarity as children became grown-ups in a sustained surrounding where their parents and grandparents guided them. New Englanders didn’t authorize any property rights to women and instead, women had to give all their property to their husbands after marriage wild Southerners authorized women with property rights if their husband dies. In New England, even the men weren’t given any rights to abuse their wives. The life of a woman was bound by motherhood because they delivered many kids.

The New England Way of Life was very interesting. The society succeeded in modeling their communities with financial riches and encouraged the more inland spread to discover stable lands comparable to those found in New England.

The ways that the New Englanders made their living was because they developed a fleet of fishing boats for them to gather fish for them to eat and they farmed crops and produced lumber for the houses and barns and boats. New Englanders had a binding society that consisted of villages and Farms as its base. As the settlements increased in the Chesapeake colonies, distribution of lands was charged to the proprietors. In the towns, it was essential for people to have fundamental education.

New England Towns started to develop and spread through a near community of towns and villages, triggering an act of change. The colonial powers created educational colleges and churches that ultimately led to political liberty’s democratic government. The reason that they went to Massachusetts was that they wanted to find the town of Plymouth and an empty village with a clear field for them to grow crops. The steps that were taken to make Massachusetts “a city upon a Hill” was for the puritans to seek and purify their churches, they wanted to supervise one another, and live under the laws derived from the bible.

The reason why the New England colonies and the Native Americans had difficult relations was that the colonists saw the Indians as people who surrendered to their worst instincts to live in the wild, instead of laboring hard and conquering and transcending nature.

The Middle Colonies used to be a subset of the thirteen colonies in British America and it is located between the New England Colonies and the Southern Colonies. Just like the Chesapeake Colonies, this area now roughly makes up the Mid-Atlantic states.

What differentiated the Middle Colonies from its neighbors in New England to the north and the Plantation colonies to the South? The middle colonies were diverse and most religiously tolerant, they were also approached as “bread colonies” because they transported grains in huge amounts, unlike the southern colonies which concentrated on growing rice and tobacco. The soil in New England wasn’t fertile, the weather wasn’t good, and the streams were short which made it hard to grow crops as the South did. new Englanders then started to shape the land by building roads, ships, fishing, and Timber.

The success of England and France’s colonies in the New World and their interactions with native Americans reflected each country’s motives for colonization. Both colonial powers strived to profit from the trading of New World commodities and spread their brand of Christianity. England and France shared similar goals for colonization but had different motivations. The New England colonies and New France are examples of how different motivations for colonization can shape their interactions with native Americans. In New France, native Americans were instrumental to the colony’s goal of profiting off the fur trade and establishing missions that required the knowledge and cooperation of native Americans. This resulted in friendlier interactions between the French and Native Americans in comparison to the English. The Massachusetts Bay and Plymouth colonies were founded as Puritan refugees, thus resulting in more hostile interactions with native Americans. The New England colonies’ goal of creating a new social order allowed for its population and wealth to flourish in comparison to New France which aspired to recreate the feudal state.

Introduction

The early settlers in the Chesapeake region and New England experienced vastly different lives due to various factors such as geography, economy, social structure, and the motivations behind colonization. This essay will examine the reasons why life in the Chesapeake region, including Virginia and Maryland, was significantly different from life in New England for the early settlers.

Geography and Climate

One of the primary factors contributing to the differences in life between the Chesapeake region and New England was their contrasting geography and climate. The Chesapeake region had a warmer and more humid climate, which facilitated the growth of cash crops such as tobacco. In contrast, New England had a colder climate with rocky soil, making agriculture more challenging. These geographic differences influenced the economic activities and lifestyles of the settlers in each region.

Economic Structure

The economic structures in the Chesapeake region and New England differed greatly. The Chesapeake colonies relied heavily on agriculture, specifically the cultivation of tobacco. Large plantations and the use of enslaved labor were common in this region. The focus on cash crop production led to an economy centered around exporting goods for profit.

In contrast, New England’s economy was built on a diverse range of industries, including fishing, shipbuilding, trade, and small-scale farming. The rocky soil and colder climate made large-scale agriculture less feasible, pushing settlers to engage in other economic activities that suited the region’s resources. The economy of New England was more focused on self-sufficiency and trade within the colonies.

Social Structure and Labor Systems

The social structures and labor systems in the Chesapeake region and New England were also markedly different. In the Chesapeake, the reliance on cash crop production led to the emergence of a plantation system with a hierarchical social structure. Large landowners held significant power and influence, while indentured servants and later enslaved Africans provided the labor needed for agriculture.

In contrast, New England had a more egalitarian society with a stronger emphasis on community and family. The Puritan values and the emphasis on communal well-being shaped the social structure in this region. The labor system in New England was predominantly based on family labor and small-scale farming, although there were also apprenticeships and some use of indentured servants.

Motivations for Colonization

The motivations behind the colonization of the Chesapeake region and New England were different, which contributed to the contrasting lifestyles of the settlers. The Chesapeake colonies, particularly Virginia, were primarily established as profit-seeking ventures. The settlers aimed to exploit the region’s abundant natural resources, particularly tobacco, for economic gain. This profit-driven motive influenced the focus on large-scale agriculture and the use of enslaved labor.

On the other hand, the New England colonies were predominantly settled by religious groups seeking religious freedom and the ability to establish their own communities based on their Puritan beliefs. The emphasis on religious values and communal living shaped the social, economic, and political aspects of life in New England.

Conclusion

Life in the Chesapeake region and New England for early settlers differed significantly due to various factors such as geography, economy, social structure, and the motivations behind colonization. The Chesapeake region’s reliance on cash crop agriculture, the plantation system, and the use of enslaved labor contrasted with New England’s diversified economy, emphasis on communal well-being, and more egalitarian social structure. Understanding these differences helps us appreciate the unique historical developments and legacies of each region, and how they continue to shape American society today.

The Compromise of 1850 stands as a pivotal moment in American history, attempting to address the contentious issues surrounding slavery and its expansion. While it was hailed as a political triumph in some circles, it also revealed the deep divisions within the nation and the fragility of maintaining equilibrium in the face of moral and economic conflicts.

The Compromise of 1850 was a series of bills designed to appease both Northern and Southern states by finding a middle ground on issues related to the newly acquired western territories and the expansion of slavery. It allowed California to enter the Union as a free state, while also introducing the concept of popular sovereignty – enabling residents of the territories to determine whether to allow slavery within their boundaries.

On the surface, this compromise seemed to offer a harmonious solution. However, beneath the surface, tensions simmered. The Fugitive Slave Act, which was also part of the package, required Northern states to assist in the capture and return of escaped slaves. This provision intensified anti-slavery sentiments in the North and was met with resistance, as it seemed to infringe upon the principles of personal liberty.

Furthermore, the idea of popular sovereignty, which aimed to let individual states decide their stance on slavery, ended up exacerbating tensions. It led to violent clashes in Kansas between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers, earning the territory the notorious moniker “Bleeding Kansas.” The very idea of democracy and self-determination seemed to be distorted as each side sought to tip the scales in their favor.

The Compromise of 1850 highlighted the fundamental moral conflict over the institution of slavery. Northern states and abolitionists viewed slavery as a moral evil, while Southern states staunchly defended it as essential to their economic and social structure. The compromise attempted to balance these opposing views, but in doing so, it exposed the nation’s inability to reconcile its moral values with its economic interests.

Additionally, the Compromise of 1850 was not a sustainable solution. It did little to resolve the core issue of whether slavery should be allowed to expand into new territories. The deep-seated divisions persisted and ultimately contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War just over a decade later. The compromise highlighted the limits of political maneuvering in the face of an issue as morally charged and deeply rooted as slavery.

In retrospect, the Compromise of 1850 serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of trying to find middle ground on issues of great moral significance. It underscores the limitations of political compromises in addressing issues that touch the very core of a nation’s values. The compromise’s attempts to maintain a fragile balance between the interests of different regions ultimately proved unsustainable and contributed to the escalation of tensions that culminated in a devastating conflict.

The Compromise of 1850 is a reminder that while political solutions may temporarily appease conflicting interests, they often fail to address the underlying moral and ethical dilemmas. It highlights the importance of addressing these issues head-on, rather than attempting to placate conflicting parties through compromise that doesn’t truly satisfy either side. History has shown that avoiding difficult conversations can lead to even greater challenges down the road.

In conclusion, the Compromise of 1850, while an attempt at maintaining equilibrium in the face of slavery-related conflicts, ultimately exposed the divisions within the nation and the limitations of political compromise. Its legacy serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of sidestepping critical moral and ethical issues for the sake of temporary harmony. The compromise teaches us that true resolution requires the courage to confront deep-seated conflicts and work towards meaningful solutions.