Industrialization after the Civil War: Thesis and Outline

Changes in the U.S. from 1865-1901

April 9, 1865, signifies the abolishment of Slavery and the end of the Civil War, beginning a new period in American history. This period saw a rapid rise in American industrialization and opportunities available to middle-class people, alongside a big surge in job openings for working-class people. While industrialization changed the country for the better, there was a violent counter-revolution of white supremacists in the South, oppressing and attacking black people across the Southern states. At this time, many immigrants came to the United States in search of work and a life that could only be achieved through employment in the United States. From 1865 to 1901 the United States’ social and economic landscapes changed drastically due to industrialization in the North, the counter-revolution of white supremacists terrorizing people of color in the South, and a massive influx of immigrants that created tension with white Americans.

Shortly after the conclusion of the Civil War, industrialization took off in the United States. Industrialization was able to rapidly accelerate in the United States thanks to working-class families being able to make more than just enough money to get by, leaving room in most Americans’ budgets for investment in new technologies (Richardson 50). Before the Civil War, working-class Americans typically didn’t have the financial capacity to even think about purchasing fun luxury items and new technologies. Thanks to factories and the start of mass production, lots of luxury items could be mass-produced and in the hands of middle- and working-class people all over the country. The money used to purchase these non-essentials would go towards improving the cities and furthering production for the companies responsible for improving and outputting more efficient technologies. This cycle of productivity is one of the biggest benefits of industrialism at the time. The 1893 Columbian Exposition of Chicago was a convention designed to show off America’s progress as a nation and contained “exhibits showing wires, guns, scales, chemicals, ceramics, typewriters, rubber, celluloid, fountain pens, artificial limbs, and every manufacture necessary to furnish a prosperous American home” (Richardson 49). The inventions and innovative thinking demonstrated at the Columbian Exposition of Chicago just go to show how quickly the people of America had made progress towards a future full of new technologies and inventions. Artificial limbs were an especially impressive invention at the time as many veterans from the Civil War had lost limbs during their service. Inventions and technology were inspiring and bringing people together, resulting in an even greater communal desire for ingenuity. A massive increase in production in the northern states led to more people having access to technologies and more money being spent on the industry, creating a feedback loop of rapid industrialization.

When the Civil War had come to an end, racism was still very much alive as it had taken a new form in vigilante groups of white supremacists. With slavery outlawed, racist southerners had found new ways to oppress black Americans through passing legislation such as “Black Codes”, which were laws passed in the South that made it easy for white landowners to get away with hiring African Americans to perform intense physical labor for very little pay (Richardson 27). In many cases, the working conditions were as bad as slavery or even worse in the cases of convict leasing. This was the process of prisons providing inmates’ labor (typically blacks) to private properties and plantations, resulting in conditions for African American prisoners being the same or worse than slavery. Legislation like the Black Codes and convict leasing are examples of the discrimination that black Americans continued to face for years after the end of the Civil War. Southerners were relentless when it came to finding ways to restrict the freedoms of freed people. Many Southerners claimed that “The act of agitating for civil rights indicated a person was unworthy of them, making it impossible to challenge increasing segregation and discrimination” (Richardson 76). This argument was used frequently as a kind of way to put freedpeople in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t the situation. Those who fought to be treated fairly would suffer further harassment from Southerners in positions of power, and those who didn’t do anything would continue to be treated poorly. While the Civil War abolished slavery in the United States of America, individuals upholding the values of white supremacy continued to oppress people of color throughout the Southern United States.

As white Americans faced issues in the new economy, they began to blame the immigrants from overseas for their issues, creating yet another avenue of racism. A large number of immigrants were from European countries, with another significant portion coming from China. The immigrants traveled overseas to make money by offering their labor in exchange for a wage that was unmatched back home (Richardson 11). At the time, there was an American belief that anybody could find success through hard work and determination. This American Dream was the big draw for working-class people who aspired for more than they could realistically achieve in their home countries. With the immigrants coming from countries with lower working wages, these people were often willing to perform manual labor for a significantly lower amount of money than the American people at the time, which led to an anti-immigrant sentiment (Lecture 1/29). The anti-immigrant sentiment of the American people created a divide between these two populations. Americans began to blame their lack of employment on the immigrants for taking up all available slots for lower prices. In response to this American mindset, Congress passed the Chinese Restriction Act in 1882, which prevented Chinese workers from immigrating (Richardson 90). This was the first legislation to prevent an entire group of people from immigrating based solely on ethnicity. The Act showed many Chinese laborers that the American Dream may have been too good to be true. The conflict between American people and immigrants from overseas was an issue that would continue to grow and develop for years.

The period of time after the Civil War saw the American people pursuing their hunger for industrialization, racism taking a new form, and an influx of immigrants from overseas coming to the United States in pursuit of work. The large wave of inventions and new ideas helped establish the North of the U.S. as a leading power in the development of new original ideas and efficiency. With the abolishment of slavery, many Southerners resorted to oppressing black people through terror and unfair laws passed by Southern legislators. Large immigrant populations came overseas in hopes of acquiring wealth and pursuing the “American dream” and were met with resistance and unrest from many white Americans. The United States changed drastically from 1865-1901, going from a country wrapping up a Civil War to becoming an industrialized empire with a southern population plagued by white supremacists, and a northern population of inventors, immigrants, and people looking to work hard to accomplish their dreams.

In the Post Civil War the United States Corporations Grew Significantly: DBQ Essay

Introduction:

The post-Civil War era in the United States witnessed a remarkable transformation in the economic landscape, marked by the substantial growth of corporations. This period, commonly referred to as the Gilded Age, saw a rapid expansion of industries such as railroads, oil, steel, and finance. This essay will analyze the factors that contributed to the significant growth of corporations during this period and examine the economic, social, and political implications of this development.

Body:

Industrialization and Technological Advances:

The post-Civil War era was characterized by industrialization and technological advancements that fueled the growth of corporations. Innovations in transportation, such as the construction of transcontinental railroads, facilitated the movement of goods and connected distant markets. Additionally, advancements in manufacturing processes, such as the Bessemer process for steel production, led to increased efficiency and productivity. These developments allowed corporations to expand their operations, increase production, and reach larger markets.

Access to Capital:

Another crucial factor in the growth of corporations was the availability of capital. Following the Civil War, the United States experienced a period of economic expansion and investment. Financial institutions, such as banks and investment firms, provided the necessary capital to fund large-scale industrial projects. Moreover, the development of capital markets and the emergence of investment banking further facilitated the growth of corporations by enabling them to raise substantial amounts of capital through stocks and bonds.

Government Policies and Support:

Government policies played a significant role in promoting and supporting corporate growth. The laissez-faire economic ideology prevalent during this period led to minimal government intervention in the economy. This environment allowed corporations to operate with limited regulation and oversight. Additionally, the federal government provided subsidies, land grants, and other forms of assistance to industries such as railroads, encouraging their expansion and development.

Consolidation and Monopoly Power:

The growth of corporations during the post-Civil War era was also characterized by consolidation and the emergence of monopoly power. Through mergers, acquisitions, and aggressive business practices, corporations sought to eliminate competition and gain control over entire industries. This consolidation of power allowed corporations to exert significant influence over prices, wages, and market conditions, often to the detriment of smaller businesses and workers.

Impact on Society and Politics:

The significant growth of corporations had profound social and political implications. On one hand, it led to increased wealth and economic prosperity for some individuals, contributing to the rise of a new class of wealthy industrialists. However, it also resulted in growing income inequality, as the benefits of industrialization were not evenly distributed. This inequality sparked social unrest and the emergence of labor movements seeking fair wages and better working conditions.

Politically, corporations wielded substantial power and influence. They used their wealth to support political candidates and advance their interests through lobbying and campaign contributions. This close relationship between corporations and politicians led to debates regarding the appropriate level of regulation and the influence of money in politics.

Conclusion:

The post-Civil War era in the United States witnessed a significant growth of corporations, driven by industrialization, access to capital, government support, and consolidation. This growth had far-reaching economic, social, and political consequences. While it fueled economic prosperity and technological advancements, it also led to the concentration of power in the hands of a few, increased inequality, and debates surrounding the role of government and regulation. Understanding the factors that contributed to this growth and its implications is crucial in assessing the development of the United States as an industrial and economic powerhouse during the Gilded Age.

Civil War Research Paper

After decades of simmering tensions between northern and southern states over slavery, states’ rights, and westward expansion, the united states civil war broke out in 1861. Seven southern states seceded and formed the confederate states of America after Abraham Lincoln’s election in 1860; four more states quickly joined them. The civil war, often known as the war between the states, ended in 1865 with the confederate surrender. The war was the most expensive and deadly ever waged on American soil, with 620,000 men killed out of a total of 2.4 million, millions more injured and most of the south destroyed. ( (Historytm n.d.))

One of the main causes of the American civil war was while the united states were enjoying tremendous growth in the mid-nineteenth century, a fundamental economic divide existed between the country’s northern and southern areas, the northern economy was based on large-scale farming that relied on the labor of colored enslaved people to grow crops, cotton, and tobacco, whilst the souths economy was based on a system of large scale farming that relied on the labor of black enslaved people to grow certain crops, especially cotton and tobacco. Many southerners feared that the existence of slavery in America and hence the backbone of the economy built on the back of slavery was in jeopardy as a result of growing abolitionist sentiment in the north after the 1830s and northern hostility to slavery’s development into new western territories. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, passed by the united states congress in 1854, effectively opened all new territories to slavery by emphasizing the primacy of popular sovereignty over congressional fiat. In ‘bleeding Kansas,’ pro and anti-slavery factions clashed brutally, while opposition to the act in the north resulted in the founding of the republican party, a new political body founded on the basis of opposing slavery’s expansion into the western territory. The election of Abraham Lincoln in November 1860 was the final straw, and within three months, seven southern states had seceded from the United States: South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. ( (Historytm n.d.))

Therefore, this led to the introduction of the Emancipation proclamation. President Abraham Lincoln issued the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862, ‘shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free’ declaring that all enslaved individuals in the states currently engaged in rebellion against the union would be freed on January 1, 1863. When he signed the formal emancipation the following January, he didn’t actually release all of the estimated 4 million men, women, and children enslaved in the united states. The document only applied to enslaved person’s confederacy, not those in union-aligned border states. However, despite its primary purpose as a military measure, the proclamation signaled a significant shift in Lincoln’s views on slavery. Emancipation would change the nation after the civil war, shifting the focus from preserving the union to abolishing slavery. ( (Historytm n.d.))

Although the emancipation proclamation did not abolish slavery in the united states, it won the hearts and minds of millions of Americans and changed the course of the war. Every advance of federal forces after January 1, 1863, increased the realm of liberty. In addition, the proclamation proclaimed that black males would be accepted into the union army and navy, allowing the released to become liberators. Almost 200,000 black soldiers and sailors fought for the union and freedom by the end of the war. Slaves had fought for their own freedom since the beginning of the civil war. The emancipation proclamation reaffirmed their belief that the union’s fight had to become a war for liberty. It gave the Union cause more moral heft and strengthened the union military and politically. The emancipation proclamation has earned a place among the great documents of human freedom as a watershed moment on the path to slavery’s ultimate abolition ( (National Archives n.d.))

The original of the January 1, 1863 emancipation proclamation can be seen in the National Archives in Washington, DC. The document was originally tied with slender red and blue ribbons and wafered impressions of the United States seal on the signature page, with the content filling five pages. The majority of the ribbon is largely intact; sections of the seal may still be read. While others have worn away. The text was combined with other proclamations in a big volume that the department of state kept for many years. It was reinforced with strips along the center folds and then mounted on a bigger sheet of strong paper when it was ready to be bound. The number of the proclamation, 95, is written in red ink on the upper right-hand corner of this big sheet, long after it was signed by the Department Of State. The book containing the Emancipation Proclamation was transferred from the Department Of State to the National Archives Of the United States in 1963, along with additional papers. ( (National Archives n.d.))

Therefore, after freeing all the enslaved on January 1, 1863, Abraham Lincoln explained his action as a wartime measure, but he did not go so far as to free the enslaved people in union-aligned border states. Nonetheless, the emancipation proclamation freed the majority of the confederacy’s workforce and shifted foreign public opinion dramatically in favor of the union. By the time the war finished in 1865, 186,000 black civil war troops had joined the union army, with 38,0000 of them dying. ( (Historytm n.d.))

Consequently, the main reason why the emancipation proclamation was directly caused by the American civil war was because of the economy and politics of slavery which led to conflict ultimately leading to the civil war. This was due to the humongous growth of the economy built on the back of slavery from the start of the 17th century (1601) to the end of the 18th century. Building a business out of the wilderness necessitated a lot of hard work. For much of the 1600s, the American colonies were primarily agricultural economies. The ‘cotton slavery’ existed from the end of the 18th century to the beginning of the civil war and was one of the biggest ‘businesses’ throughout the whole country made to maximize profits. Cotton picking and washing was a time-consuming operation that delayed manufacturing and limited supply. An inventor by the name of Edward Whitney invented the machine in 1974 that combed cotton bolls for free of their seeds in a matter of seconds. One enslaved worker could manually harvest the seeds from ten pounds of cotton in one day. Whitney, therefore, designed the ’cotton gin’ in 1794 that could process 100 pounds of cotton at once 10x more in a matter of seconds than the average enslaved worker could do in a whole day. However, there was a sense of irony about it all. Many individuals assumed that because the cotton gin could replace human labor, it would eliminate the needs of enslaved people. However, the extra processing capacity actually sped up demand. The more cotton that is treated, the more it may be shipped across the world and as a result of the increased demand, more land is needed for cultivation with the increased number of plantations expanded. ( (vox n.d.))

The cotton gathered by thousands of enslaved men and women labeled as the property was used to accoutre people around the world and fuel global industrialization. These men and women were America’s largest financial asset; they were forced to maintain America’s most exported product, and the amount of cotton gathered daily by a slave surged by 400% in 60 years, from 1801 to 1862. Subsequently, between 1801 and 1835, the US cotton exports increased from 100,000 to over a million bales, accounting for half of all US exports. This was the start of America’s big business. A historian and the author of the book The half has never been told: Slavery and the making of American capitalism by the name of Edward E. Baptist reports that ‘cotton was the No.1 export from the US, which was largely an export-driven economy as it was modernizing and shifting into industrialization. The slavery economy of the US south is deeply tied financially to the North, and to Britain, to the point that we can say that people who were buying financial products in these other places were in effect owning slaves, and extracting money from the labor of enslaved people.’ ( (vox n.d.)) Edward insinuates that the US economy expands into different parts of the world and those who purchased supplies from America, therefore, had a share in the slavery market and were not bothered as this business made them richer. The book argues that as America observes 400 years since the 1619 arrival of enslaved Africans to the colony of Virginia, these deprivations are seeing increased attention and so are the ways America’s economic empire, built on the back of the enslaved, connects to the present. So therefore, as a result of the massive increase in profit earned from the demand for cotton growth and picked out by the enslaved, there were more millionaire slave owners in cotton enslavement districts than everywhere else in the united states. This is significant because the use of slavery to gather cotton increased demand for everyday necessities like clothing and led to a boom in the US economy and industrial power. As a result of this enslaved people became a legal form of property that could be used as collateral in business transactions or to pay off outstanding debt. ( (vox n.d.))

Therefore, on the rise of the civil war, states in the south realize that the regions around them plan to abolish slavery. The southern therefore become fearful as what once made them millionaires is soon about to be gone so, southern states wanted to retain as much power in their states as possible. However, when southern states so that the idea of slavery was becoming less popular and the abolition of slavery was becoming more popular, they began to panic. They saw the land which was given to them was very slow and wasn’t growing as fast as the Northern states which therefore had feared them so much that soon enough they would lose slavery and not become economically powerful as they were before from the enslaved. Therefore, as the nation expanded and people move west, Southern states develop a strategy, an idea that they need to expand slavery into these new territories out west especially those territories that are more along the southern paths of the United States. However, with slavery being an economic activity it is difficult for southern states to move plantations across to the west to achieve this task. They also realize that they are being surrounded by political opposition such as John Brown with the main focus on fighting slavery which makes them fearful of losing this economic and industrial power known as slaves. Therefore, as the united states expand they start to see more and more compromises being made such as the compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska act which therefore leads to more conflict as new territories came in with the fight of whether it would be slavery or free causes more political conflict. This leads to the victory of Abraham Lincoln in the election of 1860. However, Abraham Lincoln did not get any votes in any of the southern areas as they feared he would abolish slavery. therefore, with his election, southern states begin to secede to protect slavery. This, therefore, begins to start the war as the Northern states say that the southern states do not have the right to secede away from the union and that if they try to leave the northern states would forcefully make them stay in the United States. This is consequential as this then leads to the American civil war as southern states try to not become part of the United States by seceding away from the union which therefore leads to the northern states forcefully making them stay. Ultimately leading to Abraham Lincoln introducing the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863.

On the other hand, however, the Emancipation Proclamation was directly not caused by the American civil war, in fact, as a war tactic to shorten the war and stop the Southern states. The civil war is commonly thought to have been fought to abolish slavery in the United States. Slavery’s abolition was not a top priority for the North even a year into the civil war. Despite the presence of a strong abolitionist movement in the North, many people particularly soldiers, opposed slavery but did not support emancipation. They expected slavery to die over time. ( (U.S History n.d.))

By the middle of 1862, Lincoln had come to believe in the necessity of abolishing slavery. Apart from his dislike for the institution, he believed that the south could not rejoin the union after attempting to destroy it. The democratic party, which is in opposition has threatened to become an anti-war party. General George McClellan, Lincoln’s military leader was a staunch opponent of emancipation. Many republicans opposed giving black people more rights because they supported measures that prohibited black settlement in their states. When Lincoln told his cabinet in mid-1862 that he wanted to issue a declaration of freedom, they persuaded him that he ought to wait until the union had gained a significant military victory. The win came at Antietam in September. No foreign country wants to form an alliance with a country that could lose power. This union’s triumph revealed that the south could lose. They refused to recognize the confederate states of America as a result, and Antietam became one of the war’s most important diplomatic engagements, as well as one of the bloodiest. Lincoln opted to issue the emancipation proclamation five days after the battle, which went into effect on January 1, 1863. He said their slaves ‘should be then, thenceforward, and permanently free’ unless the confederate states re-joined to the union by that day. ( (U.S History n.d.))

The Emancipation Proclamation is sometimes believed to have freed no slaves. In some ways, this is correct. as an act of seizing enemy resources, the proclamation would not only apply to the confederate states. Lincoln was freeing people he didn’t directly control when he freed slaves in the confederacy. Much of the union forces accepted the proclamation because of the way he explained it. He promoted emancipation as a means of shortening the war by draining Southern resources and therefore weakening the confederacy. As a soldier, even McClellan backed the policy. The border states received no such pledge of liberty from Lincoln. ( (U.S History n.d.))

However even though Abraham Lincoln used the Emancipation Proclamation as a tool to shorten the war and stop the South from seceding, the Emancipation proclamation established an atmosphere in which the abolition of slavery was considered one of the war’s principal goals. Overseas, the North appeared to be the most morally justified. Even if a foreign government wished to intervene on the South’s behalf, the people of that country might resist. although the Proclamation only freed a few slaves, it was the end of slavery in the United States. The Emancipation Proclamation eventually led to the proposal and adoption of the Thirteenth Amendment to the constitution, which effectively ended slavery in the United States.

Research Essay about Civil War

So how do you define a Civil War and what criteria do you have to fit to say that your country is at what? The most seen academic definition has two key criteria. ‘’The first says that the warring groups must be from the same country and fighting for control of the political center, control over a separatist state or to force a major change in policy. The second says that at least 1,000 people must have been killed in total, with at least 100 from each side’’.

Civil wars evidently involve countless types of conflict. The conflict actually only happens between residents of the same country, which is why the name Civil War was given. Many analysts differentiate between civil wars in which rebels try to take over and rule the current government. Conflicts that started due to wanting to gain full control of the leading government can sometimes involve rebels originating from inside the heart of the state apparatus, for example, coups which are carried out by the military (Military coup) like that of the Turkish coup d’etat, which in fact was a mostly filed attempt on 15 July 2016. The coup in Turkey was against state institutions, which included the government along with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The coup which was conducted by only a fraction of the Turkish military names themselves the Peace at Home Council. The aim was an attempt to seize control of several recognized places in Turkey such as Ankara and the capital Istanbul. Even though they attempted to seize control of these places they failed to take control of other forces who were loyal to the country and helped to defeat them.

These challenges don’t only stem from the inside of the political formation but also from the outside too. Experts differentiate between cultural wars in which the rebels and persons who are in control of the government have detached ethnic identities and innovative wars in which rebels attempt to achieve a huge key social revolution. Colonial wars are occasionally singled down to a kind distinct from civil conflicts on a state’s core ground. Nevertheless, with these variances a given civil war will frequently combine numerous factors. An example of these factors would be that the insurgencies might be equally culturally and ideologically built and the insurgents’ intentions can alternate over a period of time from secession for a limited territory area to then governing the entire state. Civil wars are normally not as severe as national battles. If you were to measure and create a death toll from the direct battles, the vast majority of logged deaths in battle since the cold war actually comes from civil wars. Civil wars tend to be more recurrent and last a much longer time than a national/world war would. Civil war can also have a considerable indirect influence on an individual’s well-being outside of the actual loss of life statistics. Over the passing years, it has been found by numerous different academic studies that the different countries who are competing in civil wars will in fact suffer hugely from a distinct downfall in gross domestic product and they won’t ever be able to recover to enable them to get to their previous economic growth level. conflict disrupts trade and investments badly and the trade in that state may even end up coming to a complete halt. this will then leave great social legacies in jobless former soldiers and displaced persons which is then hard to turn around. The negative penalties of civil war are not only felt by countries that actually experience and play a role in them: bordering countries will also end up suffering the undesirable economic effects which then may mean they are then more disposed to the chance of being involved in a civil war and violence in the upcoming future.

There is not a large amount of information and statistics prior to 1945 when it comes to that of civil wars, even though there are a lot of historic accounts of civil wars that did happen before the year of 1945. Since 1945 there have been reasonably few national wars that have happened. Civil wars have been a common occurrence around the globe. If there was to be an interstate war, this would usually last over a short time span, whereas civil wars would tend to and still do tend to last for a substantial amount of time, and are then not as likely to be settled by a formal agreement, unlike a world war. Even if a civil war was to be settled, it wouldn’t be long before the war broke out again due to the government not meeting demands or following what was promised in order for the war to be ended originally. Experts have ‘’regarded the outbreak of new civil conflicts immediately following the Cold War as evidence that the world would be more turbulent and violent after a long period of stability based on the strategy of nuclear deterrence adopted by the United States and the Soviet Union’’. However, at the end Cold War, the total number of new civil wars starting did actually decrease in comparative terms due to the initial peak close after the Cold War ended.

The majority of past and present civil wars happen within moderately inferior and less wealthy societies. Scientist in American Politics Ted Gurr ensured that he highlighted in his writing, inequality and how rebellion from many groups was the last resort after being unsatisfied for so long with the current and ever-lasting economic status, which was also relative to their aspirations. Latin American countries civil wars were a lot of the time interpreted inside a framework that would focus on economic grievances which would arise from the unequal distribution of land or upper-income discrimination. The empirical indication however which links individual income inequality to civil conflict is very mixed. Subsequent political-economic studies of civil war tended to discharge the role of grievances. Some of the individuals who researched the topic contended that criticisms are in fact universal and that the biggest importance is to concentrate on the difference in the prospects for violence. Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler argued that ‘’low overall income makes it easier to mobilize insurgencies since potential recruits have less to lose in foregone income from normal economic activities’’. James Fearon and Davis Laitin, American political scientists appealed that ‘’civil war is primarily a problem of weak states and that weakness is largely determined by economic development’.’’ Researchers had then also linked mobilization to the role of individual incentives. The chance that insurgencies can grow from conflict, for example, through stealing or being able to gain control of valued natural possessions. The said link between the existence of valued natural resources and a higher risk of civil war was also supported by empirical studies. The many civil wars that take place in African countries are examples that are usually taken as evidence to support these perspectives.

Another cause of civil war can because of political deprivation. A lack of political rights or colonial subordination can be an example of political deprivation and these factors can resort in an excuse for citizens resorting to violence. Certain conflicts which occurred after 1945 happened due to groups trying to achieve their freedom in areas that were under colonial rule.

The Indochina wars between 1946 and 1975 and the Algerian War of Independence war between 1954 and 1962 were wars that helped to start movements in other countries due to the wars showcasing exactly how influential colonial powers could be overpowered, due to continued violent movements. The Soviet Union and Ethiopia and many other ethically distinct groups that are within empire states had similar struggles when it come to national liberation. However, there is very little evidence to back up claims that cultural diversity itself makes a country more of a target of civil war than other countries that don’t.

The American Civil War was a war that overwhelmingly formed the way in which we know and perceive America today. Fought amongst the Northern and the Southern states from 1861-1865, it is said by many that the war does in fact stand to be one of the greatest misinterpreted events in American past to date. The president of the United States at the time was Abraham Lincoln. The American civil war began because of the inflexible differences between the unrestricted and slave states over the state government to forbid slavery in the terrains that had not yet become states.

Marx and Engels branded the actions in the run-up to the American civil war momentous. In January 1861 Marx sent a letter to Engels after the election of Republican Abraham Lincoln, but before the actual day of his inauguration, saying, “In my opinion, the biggest things that are happening in the world today are on the one hand the movement of the slaves in America started by the death of John Brown, and on the other the movement of the serfs in Russia.” During the war, Engels chose to specialize in the tactic of the military, of the Lincoln administration, and the Confederate Jefferson Davis rebel government. Along with Marx, he produced many perceptive articles for the New York Tribune on many political and military issues. Karl Marx however, had a more comprehensive look when it come to conflict, from the financial expansion of the country to the activities of the political and military leaders. The war did bring out a resolution for the Americans. The questions which were brought forward to be resolved through the civil war were ones that were left unsettled by the revolution. These were whether the United States was to be a dissolvable alliance of independent states or an undividable nation with an independent national leadership; and also, whether this country, which was born of a statement that all men were shaped equal rights to freedom would last to exist as the biggest slaveholding state in the biosphere.

The Bangladesh War of Independence also known as the Bangladesh Liberation War refers to the armed war between West Pakistan (which is now known as only ‘Pakistan’) and Eastern Pakistan (which is now Bangladesh). This Civil war started in 1971 and lasted for about nine months. The main and most important outcome for Bangladesh was that it gained its independence from Pakistan and become its own country. Eastern Pakistan had the largest population compared to all of the other provinces, however, it had much less political power compared to that of West Pakistan. Over time this caused the population of East Population to rebel. The leader at the time Sheik Mujibur, who was in control of the Awami League in the East of Pakistan had to demand both more political and financial power. From this, the country finally went to war for independence.

Pakistan was the first contemporary state in the world to be founded solely on the basis of religion. The partition due to religion happened in 1947 when Pakistan separated from India due to the ‘two-nation’ thesis that both Hindus and Muslims could not live together in agreement due to the differences in the religions. ‘’ Both East and West Pakistan remained united because of their religion, Islam. West Pakistan had 97% Muslims and East Pakistanis had 85% Muslims. However, there were several significant reasons that caused the East Pakistani people to fight for their independence’’. (Alburuj Razzaq Rahman ) It was June 13th, 1971 when an article was released in the UK’s Sunday Times which truly exposed the extent of the brutality of Pakistan’s suppression of the Bangladeshi uprising. ‘’Abdul Bari had run out of luck. Like thousands of other people in East Bengal, he had made the mistake – the fatal mistake – of running within sight of a Pakistani patrol. He was 24 years old, a slight man surrounded by soldiers. He was trembling because he was about to be shot’’. The article was written by Anthony Mascarenhas, who was a Pakistani reporter who printed his articles in the UK’S Sunday Times. For the first time in history, Andrew managed to expose the scale and force of brutality that Pakistan’s army would use to suppress its breakaway from the eastern province in 1971. It can’t be said for certain the exact number of people who were killed during the civil war but the number is certainly very huge, especially compared to civil wars in other counties. Some independent researchers have claimed to think that the number of deaths ranged between 300,000 and 500,000, however, the Bangladesh government has put the figure forward at an astonishing three million. One of the most notorious war crimes committed by Pakistan’s army was when soldiers stormed Dhaka University, lined all the students up along with their professors, and executed them. Bangladesh is now able to celebrate the 40th anniversary of its separation from Pakistan after Pakistan’s failed strategy. Due to Mascarenhas’ report on the brutality of the Pakistan military and government, it is believed and no doubt that the article played a significant role in turning the world opinion on Pakistan, ending the war, whilst also reassuring India to play a pivotal role. Since Bangladesh’s separation from Pakistan, they haven’t had the best relationship with each other, even though it has been many years since the separation.

There are also several Civil Wars that are taking place right now, in many different countries. When we think of Civil War it should just be remembered as something that happened tens of years ago. The three conflicts that I am going to briefly discuss now are conflicts that have caused at the minimum of 10,000 deaths which have been caused by direct violence so far this year or throughout the last calendar year.

The Civil War in Afghanistan which first started in 2001 is one of those ongoing conflicts that has claimed an estimated more than 38,000 Afghanistan, and around 58,600 Afghan soldiers, this being since the war began in 2001 (Realtime Data, 2018).

The Taliban had control of the majority of the country since 1996 and during that period they allowed al-Qaeda (a terrorist organization) to set up training camps around the country and recruit terrorists and commit acts of terror. Al-Qaeda was responsible for the nearly 3,000 deaths of innocent people killed in the 9/11 twin towers terrorist attacks. In November 2001, they were defeated by the British and American Military, along with many fighters from an Afghan group known as the Northern Alliance. After the Twin Towers attack, George W. Bush who was America’s President at the time chose to launch the first of many missiles over to Afghanistan in October 200. The goal in mind was to destroy both al-Qaeda and the Taliban in order to save the country from any more terrorists. Unfortunately, after 17 years the Taliban is now stronger than they ever have been and continue to fight for the control of the Afghan government, with the a-Qaeda which once became extinct now reappearing.

Another conflict that I personally would not have thought of as a Civil War is the Mexican Drug War, 2006. The Mexican drug war is a war that claims thousands of lives every year, due to many parts of Mexico actually being controlled by some of the most notorious drug lords. El Chapo, being the most famous drug cartel of all time is currently on trial in the US.

It is said that Mexican drug cartels can earn between at least $19 billion and $29 billion each year purely from drug sales within the US only. A 2018 Congressional research study claimed, ‘’many sources indicate, that about 150,000 international homicides since 2006 were organized crime-related’’ (Congressional research study, 2018).

With tens of Civil Wars still happening around the world right now, all with different reasons behind them, why aren’t countries like Britain or America trying to help stop them? The end of the Cold War did bring a small reduction to the Civil Wars around the world, although wars cease to come to a halt in countries such as Yemen, Libya, Syria, Iraq, etc.

A Professor of International Politics, Monica Duffy says that what the history of the world and the Civil War tells us is that there are two ways which are the most effective way to end Civil wars and they’re Military victory and negotiated settlement. “The international community has a strong proclivity towards negotiated settlements, so you want the parties to both lay down their arms and negotiate an end to the civil war where each of them feels as if they have a part to play in the configuration of the new state. That is the absolute preference that the international community has, and it pushes for that. We are pushing for that today in Syria, Afghanistan.’ (Monica Duffy, 2016).

Toff contends that remaining soldiers from the country going through conflict come together with the American military to represent the nation’s wider interests and close down the Civil Wars. To me this is probably unrealistic as the county in conflict may not stick to the negotiations agreed on, which will in the long run develop a bitter relationship between themselves and the US who helped them to end the war.

Industrialization after the Civil War: Thesis and Outline

Changes in the U.S. from 1865-1901

April 9, 1865, signifies the abolishment of Slavery and the end of the Civil War, beginning a new period in American history. This period saw a rapid rise in American industrialization and opportunities available to middle-class people, alongside a big surge in job openings for working-class people. While industrialization changed the country for the better, there was a violent counter-revolution of white supremacists in the South, oppressing and attacking black people across the Southern states. At this time, many immigrants came to the United States in search of work and a life that could only be achieved through employment in the United States. From 1865 to 1901 the United States’ social and economic landscapes changed drastically due to industrialization in the North, the counter-revolution of white supremacists terrorizing people of color in the South, and a massive influx of immigrants that created tension with white Americans.

Shortly after the conclusion of the Civil War, industrialization took off in the United States. Industrialization was able to rapidly accelerate in the United States thanks to working-class families being able to make more than just enough money to get by, leaving room in most Americans’ budgets for investment in new technologies (Richardson 50). Before the Civil War, working-class Americans typically didn’t have the financial capacity to even think about purchasing fun luxury items and new technologies. Thanks to factories and the start of mass production, lots of luxury items could be mass-produced and in the hands of middle- and working-class people all over the country. The money used to purchase these non-essentials would go towards improving the cities and furthering production for the companies responsible for improving and outputting more efficient technologies. This cycle of productivity is one of the biggest benefits of industrialism at the time. The 1893 Columbian Exposition of Chicago was a convention designed to show off America’s progress as a nation and contained “exhibits showing wires, guns, scales, chemicals, ceramics, typewriters, rubber, celluloid, fountain pens, artificial limbs, and every manufacture necessary to furnish a prosperous American home” (Richardson 49). The inventions and innovative thinking demonstrated at the Columbian Exposition of Chicago just go to show how quickly the people of America had made progress towards a future full of new technologies and inventions. Artificial limbs were an especially impressive invention at the time as many veterans from the Civil War had lost limbs during their service. Inventions and technology were inspiring and bringing people together, resulting in an even greater communal desire for ingenuity. A massive increase in production in the northern states led to more people having access to technologies and more money being spent on the industry, creating a feedback loop of rapid industrialization.

When the Civil War had come to an end, racism was still very much alive as it had taken a new form in vigilante groups of white supremacists. With slavery outlawed, racist southerners had found new ways to oppress black Americans through passing legislation such as “Black Codes”, which were laws passed in the South that made it easy for white landowners to get away with hiring African Americans to perform intense physical labor for very little pay (Richardson 27). In many cases, the working conditions were as bad as slavery or even worse in the cases of convict leasing. This was the process of prisons providing inmates’ labor (typically blacks) to private properties and plantations, resulting in conditions for African American prisoners being the same or worse than slavery. Legislation like the Black Codes and convict leasing are examples of the discrimination that black Americans continued to face for years after the end of the Civil War. Southerners were relentless when it came to finding ways to restrict the freedoms of freed people. Many Southerners claimed that “The act of agitating for civil rights indicated a person was unworthy of them, making it impossible to challenge increasing segregation and discrimination” (Richardson 76). This argument was used frequently as a kind of way to put freedpeople in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t the situation. Those who fought to be treated fairly would suffer further harassment from Southerners in positions of power, and those who didn’t do anything would continue to be treated poorly. While the Civil War abolished slavery in the United States of America, individuals upholding the values of white supremacy continued to oppress people of color throughout the Southern United States.

As white Americans faced issues in the new economy, they began to blame the immigrants from overseas for their issues, creating yet another avenue of racism. A large number of immigrants were from European countries, with another significant portion coming from China. The immigrants traveled overseas to make money by offering their labor in exchange for a wage that was unmatched back home (Richardson 11). At the time, there was an American belief that anybody could find success through hard work and determination. This American Dream was the big draw for working-class people who aspired for more than they could realistically achieve in their home countries. With the immigrants coming from countries with lower working wages, these people were often willing to perform manual labor for a significantly lower amount of money than the American people at the time, which led to an anti-immigrant sentiment (Lecture 1/29). The anti-immigrant sentiment of the American people created a divide between these two populations. Americans began to blame their lack of employment on the immigrants for taking up all available slots for lower prices. In response to this American mindset, Congress passed the Chinese Restriction Act in 1882, which prevented Chinese workers from immigrating (Richardson 90). This was the first legislation to prevent an entire group of people from immigrating based solely on ethnicity. The Act showed many Chinese laborers that the American Dream may have been too good to be true. The conflict between American people and immigrants from overseas was an issue that would continue to grow and develop for years.

The period of time after the Civil War saw the American people pursuing their hunger for industrialization, racism taking a new form, and an influx of immigrants from overseas coming to the United States in pursuit of work. The large wave of inventions and new ideas helped establish the North of the U.S. as a leading power in the development of new original ideas and efficiency. With the abolishment of slavery, many Southerners resorted to oppressing black people through terror and unfair laws passed by Southern legislators. Large immigrant populations came overseas in hopes of acquiring wealth and pursuing the “American dream” and were met with resistance and unrest from many white Americans. The United States changed drastically from 1865-1901, going from a country wrapping up a Civil War to becoming an industrialized empire with a southern population plagued by white supremacists, and a northern population of inventors, immigrants, and people looking to work hard to accomplish their dreams.

In the Post Civil War the United States Corporations Grew Significantly: DBQ Essay

Introduction:

The post-Civil War era in the United States witnessed a remarkable transformation in the economic landscape, marked by the substantial growth of corporations. This period, commonly referred to as the Gilded Age, saw a rapid expansion of industries such as railroads, oil, steel, and finance. This essay will analyze the factors that contributed to the significant growth of corporations during this period and examine the economic, social, and political implications of this development.

Body:

Industrialization and Technological Advances:

The post-Civil War era was characterized by industrialization and technological advancements that fueled the growth of corporations. Innovations in transportation, such as the construction of transcontinental railroads, facilitated the movement of goods and connected distant markets. Additionally, advancements in manufacturing processes, such as the Bessemer process for steel production, led to increased efficiency and productivity. These developments allowed corporations to expand their operations, increase production, and reach larger markets.

Access to Capital:

Another crucial factor in the growth of corporations was the availability of capital. Following the Civil War, the United States experienced a period of economic expansion and investment. Financial institutions, such as banks and investment firms, provided the necessary capital to fund large-scale industrial projects. Moreover, the development of capital markets and the emergence of investment banking further facilitated the growth of corporations by enabling them to raise substantial amounts of capital through stocks and bonds.

Government Policies and Support:

Government policies played a significant role in promoting and supporting corporate growth. The laissez-faire economic ideology prevalent during this period led to minimal government intervention in the economy. This environment allowed corporations to operate with limited regulation and oversight. Additionally, the federal government provided subsidies, land grants, and other forms of assistance to industries such as railroads, encouraging their expansion and development.

Consolidation and Monopoly Power:

The growth of corporations during the post-Civil War era was also characterized by consolidation and the emergence of monopoly power. Through mergers, acquisitions, and aggressive business practices, corporations sought to eliminate competition and gain control over entire industries. This consolidation of power allowed corporations to exert significant influence over prices, wages, and market conditions, often to the detriment of smaller businesses and workers.

Impact on Society and Politics:

The significant growth of corporations had profound social and political implications. On one hand, it led to increased wealth and economic prosperity for some individuals, contributing to the rise of a new class of wealthy industrialists. However, it also resulted in growing income inequality, as the benefits of industrialization were not evenly distributed. This inequality sparked social unrest and the emergence of labor movements seeking fair wages and better working conditions.

Politically, corporations wielded substantial power and influence. They used their wealth to support political candidates and advance their interests through lobbying and campaign contributions. This close relationship between corporations and politicians led to debates regarding the appropriate level of regulation and the influence of money in politics.

Conclusion:

The post-Civil War era in the United States witnessed a significant growth of corporations, driven by industrialization, access to capital, government support, and consolidation. This growth had far-reaching economic, social, and political consequences. While it fueled economic prosperity and technological advancements, it also led to the concentration of power in the hands of a few, increased inequality, and debates surrounding the role of government and regulation. Understanding the factors that contributed to this growth and its implications is crucial in assessing the development of the United States as an industrial and economic powerhouse during the Gilded Age.