Pepsi Company is one of the world leader producers of food and non-alcoholic beverages. It has got a snack branch in North America known as Frito-Lay, PepsiCo Beverage International and what is known as Quaker Foods also in North America.
Research reveals that the non-alcoholic beverage industry comprises of three major competitors which are PepsiCo, Coca-Cola and Cadbury Schweppes. PepsiCo is known to currently control around 21% of the total market share within beverage industry. However, Frito-Lay controls 60% of the total snack-food market share within the U.S market (Pepsi Company Overview).
Industry competitive structure analysis
The structure of the industry is oligopolistic; this is since the industry is dominated by three major players which are Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and Cadbury Schweppes. Analysis and description of beverage products in relation to competition focuses on market share owned by Pepsi in relation to its competitors.
The industry’s relatively slowing market is characterized by tremendous and stiff competition. The rivalry has majorly been between Pepsi and Coca-Cola for fairly longer time. Top ten ranked companies in beverage market based on market coverage includes; Coca Cola, Pepsi, Snapple, Cott, National heritage, Hansen natural, Red bull, Big red, Rock star and others with Coca-Cola at the top and Rock star at the bottom rank with only 0.4% market coverage (Pepsi Company Overview).
Coca-Cola Company owns four soft drink brands which includes; Minute Maid Juices, Minute Maid Lemonade, Fruit Drinks and others. Minute maid orange juices have tremendous success within the market. The success of Coca-Cola in business is based on conducting effective advertising and promotional programs which still keeps them ahead of competitors (Coca-Cola Company).
Pepsi Company deals with products ranging from Fritolay Brands, Gatorade Brands to Quaker Brands and best range of Tropicana juices under the Tropicana Brand. However, PepsiCo has shown improvement over the years in building great brand name.
Example of the companies struggling within the beverage industry is Snapple Juice Company. They have not succeeded yet in consolidating range of Snapple juices through retailers which could be of benefit in efficient product delivery to the target markets.
The company has also found it difficult to cope with the pricing which are always affected by costs of raw materials determined by their availability. They have been unsuccessful in offering Snapple brand having the capability of attaining to consumer’s level of health consciousness. Their new flavors have not yet been fully accepted within the market (Pepsi Company Overview).
Gross profit Margin comparison
Pepsi (%)
Coca-Cola (%)
Cadbury (%)
Industry Average (%)
2000
60.46
69.67
53.86%
61.77%
2001
59.46
69.92
52.86
61.43
2002
53.67
63.68
47.9
55.8
2003
53.6
62.9
48.6
55.8
2004
53.7
64.7
49.3
56.98
The comparison of the gross profit margin shows some great concern within PepsiCo’s profitability based on sales. Coca-Cola has clear gain of more profit on sales as compared to other competitors. This gives some hint on PepsiCo’s ability in the management of the cost of production since most of its values are less than industry average.
Financial comparisons of key competitors
Despite the low concentration of firms within the beverage industry, the three major firms PepsiCo, Coca-cola and Cadbury Schweppes accounts for almost 80% of the entire global market. The largest market share within the industry is under the command of Coca-Cola accounting for almost 50% while PepsiCo controls around 21% of the total global market share, Cadbury has below 10% coverage. The level of competition amongst these firms is basically based on product differentiation.
Some of the key accounting policies applied in the analysis and valuation of the company’s financial status include revenue recognition, income tax expense and ascertained accruals, quality of brand and valuation of goodwill as well as stock compensation expenses. For the purposes of maintaining high reputation for superior products, PepsiCo resorts to recognizing their revenue upon delivery of products (Sila and Ballard 13-46).
Evaluation on the accuracy of PepsiCo accounting policies gives clear picture of their economic reality within the industry in comparison to other companies. All the companies within beverage industry recognize revenue upon transfer of products.
They also apply the use of credit terms allowing payment to be made within 30 days of delivery, at the same time PepsiCo and Coca-Cola applies the same principle on brand and goodwill valuations. Indefinite intangible assets are not amortized while definite intangible assets are amortized within the beverage companies, the three companies also applies the use of fair value methods for the purposes of accounting for employee stocks (Sila and Ballard 13-46).
Analysis of the Financial Statements
Overall operations of PepsiCo outside United States have proved viable since it generates approximately 35% of the total net revenue. Twenty percent of these are obtained from potential hubs such as Mexico, United Kingdom as well as Canada. The other percentage ranging between 13-15% is generated from other countries of the world.
However, PepsiCo’s market penetration is exposed to threats such as foreign currency and political unrest. Prevention of such risks involves strategies such as entering into forward contracts having terms of no more than two years (Sila and Ballard 13-46).
Accounting Ratios for PepsiCo since the year 2000
2009
2003
2002
2001
2000
Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio
1.28
1.08
1.06
1.17
1.17
Quick Asset Ratio
1.0
0.75
0.72
0.76
0.8
Inventory turnover
9.76
8
7.84
7.51
7.87
Receivables Turnover
7.8
9.5
1.0
13.0
11.4
Profitability Ratios
Gross profit margin
53.6%
53.56%
53.67%
59.46%
60.46%
Net Profit Margin
14.4%
13.23%
13.19%
9.88%
10.68%
Asset Turnover
1.05
1.06
1.07
1.24
1.11
Return on Asset
15.05%
14.09%
14.11%
12.26%
11.90%
Return on Equity
31.24%
30.15%
35.81%
30.76%
30.11%
Capital Structure Ratio
Debt to Equity Ratio
1.07
1.14
1.53
1.51
1.53
Examination and analysis of several accounting ratios helped in determining the liquidity of PepsiCo. The current year financial breakdown and previous years gives the clear analysis on the changes experienced within PepsiCo. The ratios reveal the company to be relatively liquid.
The current ratio reveals favorable status, the increase from 1.2 in 2000 to current 1.3 shows that the current assets have increased compared to current liabilities. The firm’s liquidity is further revealed by quick ratio which determines its ability to meet current obligations on the basis of improved liquid assets.
The improvement could be recognized from 0.8 in 2000 to 1 in the current year, showing that current and future obligations of the company can now be solved faster than previously. However, receivable turnover have since decreased posing some threat to liquidity. Inventory turnover has experienced considerable increase indicating valuable productivity in the use of inventory, the increase from 7.9 in 2000 to current 9.76 clearly indicate this (Sila and Ballard 13-46).
The level of profitability for PepsiCo is considered moderate as revealed through the financial analysis. The company has experienced decrease in Gross Profit Margin, indicating an increase in the level of cost of goods sold over the years. This means that the company spends more on the production of their products compared to the output.
There is an increase of around 0.12% from the previous years. Net profit Margin has since changed creating some positive impact; the notable increase has been around 4.4% since the year 2000. Asset Turnover has however decreased from 2000 indicating that PepsiCo has got trouble in converting the available assets to sales (Sila and Ballard 13-46).
Conclusion
The analysis of the financial ratios indicates that PepsiCo has slightly positive results on the capital structure. The ratios show positive Debt to Equity ratio, hence the company’s ability to finance its businesses debt free. The level of liquidity ratios revealed indicates that PepsiCo has got the capability of meeting short-time obligations better off than other competing beverage companies within the market.
Nowadays, the demand for various products of the alcoholic beverage industry has been dramatically increased. Still, such conclusions are made not because of the fact that people start drinking more. Such changes are caused by the possibilities of people to choose drinks in regards to their incomes, health, and personal tastes. This industry includes providers, producers, wholesalers, distributors, operators, and other stakeholders, who make spirits available to ordinary people (Jernigan 6). During different epochs, people faced a number of problems proving the importance or threats of this industry because some people could not understand the needs of legalized spirits consumption, and more people wanted to earn on the production and distribution of various alcoholic beverages.
Industry Analysis over Five Years
During the last five years, total alcoholic beverage sales have been raised in the United States. In 2010, the numbers were about $188 billion, and in 2015, the numbers were high than $200 billion. The changes in the industry are evident indeed. People start paying attention to such issues as self-regulation effectiveness, responsibility, or even manipulation (Savell, Fooks, and Gilmore 19). In the United States, the beverage industry continues growing: more than 60% of all revenues in the industry are made of the revenues of alcoholic beverages (Park Street par. 1). Such numbers prove the fact that more companies want to be involved in this industry in order to introduce tasty, safe, and effective alcoholic production. Competition in this industry is an ordinary affair. Many companies try to prove their worth and effectiveness by choosing various methods and approaches.
Marketing and Competitive Strategies of Beam Suntory and Diageo
Beam Suntory is an American leading manufacturer of spirits that stir the world (Beam Suntory About par. 1). In 1795, its founder, Jacob Beam, sold his first barrel of whiskey (Beam Suntory History 1). Nowadays, it is a huge company with its vision to outperform the market with a powerful marketing strategy (Beam Suntory Leadership Team par. 1).The strategy that has been using by the company’s leaders during the last decades is based on three main issues such as the creation of famous brands, the building of winning markets, and the fuel of organizational growth. Such a strategy continues working until people comprehend their duties and responsibilities. Besides, the company’s culture is perfectly-identified in order to encourage creative thinking and innovative solutions and develop entrepreneurial skills that motivate people and underline a kind of common mindset (Beam Suntory Leadership Team par. 3).
Diageo is a famous alcoholic beverage company in the United Kingdom. It focuses on the production and distribution of such products as vodka, whiskey, stout, and other beverages famous in Scotland, England, and Italy. More than 33,000 people work in the company to meet the same goal that is the celebration of life every day and everywhere (Diageo par. 1). The strategy of the company is to promote the professional and personal development of each employee in the company.
The strategies of both companies are similar. Still, the main difference is that Beam Suntory is focused on motivation that plays a crucial role for its people, and Diageo wants to encourage its people and create the opportunities under which the best products could be distributed. Both companies also pay attention to their consumers. Still, the attention to employees and the quality of their work turn out to be the most integral issues for both companies in the alcoholic industry.
Works Cited
Beam Suntory. n.d. About. n.d. Web.
History. n.d. Web.
Leadership Team. n.d. Web.
Diageo. n.d. Our People. n.d. Web.
Jernigan, David H. “The Global Alcohol Industry: An Overview.” Addiction 104. 1 (2009): 6-12.
Park Street. n.d. US Alcoholic Beverage Market – Overview. n.d. Web.
Savell, Emily, Gary Fooks, and Anna B. Gilmore. “How Does the Alcohol Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review.” Addiction 111.1 (2016): 18-32.
Australian company manufacturing alcoholic products seeks to enter the Ireland market.
Ireland
Ireland got its independence in 1921 after a great struggle and was followed by a brief civil war, which ended in 1923. It established its constitution in 1937 and was declared a republic in 1949. It joined the European Economic Community (EEC, now the EU) in 1973. The monetary policy of the country is determined by the European Central bank whereas the fiscal policy is determined by the domestic government. Currently, the microeconomic environment remains pro-business (The Economist, 2007). The economic policy of Ireland revolves around keeping Ireland an attractive destination for FDI. However, there needs to be more improvement in public services such as transport and health. The basic statistical data for Ireland is seen in the following table1:
Table 1. Statistical data for Ireland
Annual data
2006(a)
Historical averages (%)
2002-06
Population (m)
4.2
Population growth
1.6
GDP (US$ bn; market exchange rate)
219.4
Real GDP growth
5.3
GDP (US$ bn; purchasing power parity)
174.0
Real domestic demand growth
5.1
GDP per head (US$; market exchange rate)
51,861
Inflation
3.3
GDP per head (US$; purchasing power parity)
41,137
Current-account balance (% of GDP)
-1.9
Exchange rate (av)€:US$
0.80
FDI inflows (% of GDP)
4.7
(a) Actual.
Foreign Trade in Ireland
Ireland is a small country, that holds a great deal of potential for exporters from developed countries like the US. Since the mid-1990’s, the CelticTiger’s economy has boomed. The availability of a highly educated workforce along with strong government fiscal policy has attracted good foreign direct investment. Transportation and other infrastructure are good in Ireland. There are now over 550 U.S. companies with branches in Ireland (Hanley, 2001). Consumer demand for more diverse, quality foods from overseas markets has resulted in niche market opportunities for exporters from the United States and else-where, according to Thomas Hamby, U.S. Minister Counselor for Agricultural Affairs at the American Embassy in London (Hanley, 2001). Ireland has traditionally been a liberal country when it came to consumption of alcoholic drinks and people often met at the pub. More recently, the consumption of alchol by adults is declining. One of the major threats to the alcoholic drinks industry in Ireland is the increase in the number of coffee shops on the high street. These coffee shops are positioned as meeting points and as places to relax in and hence compete with the alcoholic drinks market (The Economist, 2007).
In 2006 merchandise exports amounted to US$104.7bn and imports to US$72.8bn. Thus Ireland has a big trade surplus. Despite the large trade surplus, the current account registered a deficit of US$9.1bn, or 4.2% of GDP, reflecting the large deficits on the services and income account (The Economist, 2007). As a member of the European Union, Ireland it does not have authority to negotiate directly with non-EU countries. The export- import data for Ireland are as follows:
Major exports 2006
% of total
Major imports 2006
% of total
Chemicals&related products
47.0
Machinery&transport equipment
42.0
Machinery&transport equipment
26.0
Chemicals&related products
13.2
Miscellaneous manufactured goods
9.7
Miscellaneous manufactured goods
12.0
Total food&live animals chiefly for food
7.9
Manufactured goods
9.1
Leading markets 2006
% of total
Leading suppliers 2006
% of total
US
19.3
UK
35.6
UK
17.8
US
11.0
Belgium
16.3
Germany
9.1
Germany
7.7
Netherlands
4.4
The above trade data shows that Ireland is interested in importing products from developed countries such as UK, US and Germany2.
EU Common Commercial Policy
Ireland’s international trade policies are based on the evolving EU Common Commercial Policy (CCP). The EU negotiates as a single entity at the World Trade Organisation and the EU Common Commercial Policy Section represents Ireland’s interests at other EU trade committees, including those dealing with Anti-Dumping measures, the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) for developing countries, Commodity Agreements and Rules of Origin.
However, every country in the European Union (EU) has its own laws and other policies.
In Ireland, according to 2006 reports, the beverages’ sector, soft drinks, wines and spirits notably, pursue their 2005 upward trend with high growth rates (CIAA, 2006). Higher on-trade prices and stricter legislation drive the ‘cocooning’ trend. It has been found that wine is especially popular in Ireland whereas Eastern European immigrants have increased the demand for vodka products in Ireland. The culture in Ireland for the present is that younger consumers are choosing to experiment.
Global Alcoholic Drinks Industry
There are a lot of changes in the global alcoholic drinks market which is causing transformations in the way alcoholic products are developed, produced and marketed. The consumers today are well informed regarding quality choose to purchase better quality products while at the same time, they are moderate in consumption due to growing health concerns. But, changes in demographics are also opening up new markets for alcoholic drinks manufacturers. It is significant to note that the greatest share of new alcoholic products were introduced in Europe in 2006. This is mainly because of developments in the wine category. New kinds of wines were introduced so much so the wine category occupied a share of 58% of all new product introductions in Europe (Business Wire, 2007). The popularity of wine is due to the fact that people considered it beneficial to health.
Some important facts unearthed by Research and Markets are3:
The value of the European and US alcoholic drinks market combined is increasing and is expected to reach $745.1bn by 2010.
Premiumization is the major trend defining the alcoholic drinks market. Value and volume sales projections to 2010 show that this trend is set to continue in both mature and emerging markets.
In Europe, the Eastern European markets are expected to grow the best over the next five years.
Wine products launches represent 46.1% of all alcoholic drinks launches, growing from 32.2% in 2004 and the most new product launches were within red wine.
Private label sales of alcoholic drinks are projected to rise by 28% in Europe over the next 5 years. However, industry executives predict that consumers are likely to choose premium branded products and promote their sales growth. According to the Research and Markets Report, it has been found that the organic product tag was one of the few to increase in use on alcoholic drinks, increasing from 2.1% in 2004 to 4.0% in 2006. This shows that the health trend is likely to continue. The report suggests that the organic trend will be increasingly important from the point of view of alcoholic product manufacturers for moving forward especially within the European market. Asahi Honnama Aqua Blue is a beer product formulated to appeal to a more health conscious consumer (Business Wire, 2007). It was launched in January 2006 and is said to be made with pure barley extract and water from deep waters in the oceans. It is said to contain DNA and seaweed extract that is rich in minerals with 30% less carbohydrate. Thus Asahi Breweries has positioned this beer product as a healthier alternative to regular beer (Business Wire, 2007).
The report also points out that vodka will constitute the single largest opportunity in the spirits market and holds that the younger generation can be the target market for ready-to-drink vodka cocktails. Moreover, it has been found that there is great marketing opportunity at the premium end of the market. Connoisseurs are increasingly willing to pay premium prices for purity of product and Vodka 14 is an example of how the pure positioning is being sold to consumers.
Ireland and Alcoholic Drinks
Ireland was generally considered to be a liberal country in its attitudes to alcohol and was a favorite destination for stag parties and hen parties. Ireland’s per capita litre consumption has increased from 7.0 in 1970 to 14.5 in 2001 according to the World Health Organization and 13.5 in 2004. This compares with 20.4 in France in 1970 down to 13.0 in 2004 (Finfacts Ireland, 2007).
Alcohol consumption, liters per population aged 15+
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Australia
9.4
11.6
12.9
10.5
9.8
9.6
10.0
9.8
..
Austria
10.9
13.9
13.8
12.6
11.1
10.8
11.0
11.1
..
Belgium
8.9
12.3
14.0
12.1
10.3
10.3
10.7
10.7
..
Canada
7.0
8.8
10.7
7.4
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.9
..
Czech Republic
..
..
11.8
11.3
11.8
11.8
11.9
12.1
11.5
Denmark
5.5
8.6
11.7
11.7
11.5
11.4
11.2
11.5
11.4
Finland
2.7
5.8
7.9
9.5
8.6
9.0
9.2
9.3
9.9
France
..
20.4
19.5
16.0
14.2
14.5
14.7
14.0
.13.0.
Germany
7.5
13.4
14.2 ²
13.8
10.5
10.4
10.4
10.2
10.1
Greece
..
..
13.2
10.7
9.5
9.3
9.2
..
..
Hungary
8.2
11.5
14.9
13.9
12.0
13.2
13.3
13.2
..
Iceland
2.5 ¹
3.8
4.3
5.2
6.1
6.3
6.5
6.5
6.7
Ireland
4.9
7.0
9.6
11.2
14.2
14.5
14.3
13.5
13.6
Italy
16.6
18.2
13.2
10.9
9.0
8.6
8.6
8.0
..
Japan
5.0 ³
6.1
7.1
8.0
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
..
Korea
..
..
..
9.1
8.9
7.9
8.5
8.6
8.3
Luxembourg
13.1
15.6
16.8´¹
14.7
15.4
15.3
14.7
15.5
..
Mexico
..
..
3.4
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.6
4.6
..
Netherlands
3.7
7.7
11.3
9.9
10.1
10.0
9.8
9.7
..
New Zealand
5.3
9.8
11.8
10.1
8.9
8.8
9.2
8.9
9.2
Norway
3.4
4.7
5.3
5.0
5.7
5.5
5.9
6.0
6.2
Poland
6.3 ¹
8.0 ¹
8.7 ¹
8.3
8.3
7.8
8.1
8.1
..
Portugal
17.2 ¹
17.9´¹
14.8
16.3
12.9
12.3
11.5
11.4
..
Slovak Republic
6.9
12.8
14.5
13.4
8.9
8.7
8.8
7.4
9.4
Spain
14.6 ²
16.1
18.4
13.5
11.5
11.5
11.2
11.7
..
Sweden
4.8
7.2
6.7
6.4
6.2
6.5
6.9
7.0
6.5
Switzerland
12.1
14.2
13.5
12.9
11.2
11.1
10.8
10.8
10.7
Turkey
0.9
1.1
1.8
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.5
..
United Kingdom
..
7.1
9.4
9.8
10.4
10.7
11.0
11.2
11.5
United States
7.8
9.5
10.5
9.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.4
..
Definitions, Sources and Methods per country: www.irdes.fr/ecosante/OCDE/812010.html
Copyright OECD HEALTH DATA 2006, Published June 2006
Alcoholic consumption declined in 2004 due to increased legislation and rising prices. Factors such as high excise duty, a ban on ‘happy hours’ (2003) and smoking in public places (2004) and the reorganisation of outdated Irish drinking laws under the Liquor Licensing Bill (2005) (Euromonitor International, 2003). Drinking became a luxury in Ireland due to increased living costs and busier lifestyles. There was a steady shift of alcoholic drinks volume sales from the on-trade channel to the off-trade channel. The change in drinking culture, which was evident throughout Ireland in 2006, is commonly described as ‘cocooning’ – the desire among consumers to do the bulk of their socialising in the comfort of their own homes (Euromonitor, 2003). However, it should be noted that while total alcoholic drinks volume sales showed persistent declines over 2001 – 2005, the per capita consumption rate in Ireland remained one of the highest in the world in 2006 (Euromonitor, 2007). Accordingly, the country’s alcoholic drinks market is still very much attractive and challenging. As a direct outcome of the ‘cocooning’ total wine sales showed strong growth in volume and current value terms in 2006 and was the real bright spot in an otherwise depressed market (Euromonitor, 2007). Wine products are predicted to do well in the future as well. Moreover, it has been found that alcoholic drinks consumption among Irish women is rising steadily and wine seems to be their favorite drink. A recent Drinks Industry Group of Ireland report estimated that 70 per cent of alcohol in Ireland is bought in pubs and restaurants. This is a substantially higher proportion than our European counterparts, largely due to the greater propensity for Irish people to drink in pubs and restaurants rather than at home.
The recent national accounts from the Central Statistics Office show that expenditure on alcohol in Ireland is 8.6 per cent of total personal expenditure, which has declined from 10.8 per cent in the mid-1990s (Finfacts Ireland, 2007). The recent EU-funded report claims that Ireland spends three times more than any other country on alcohol. The trend over the last decade was for actual alcohol consumed to rise as income levels increased significantly, but at the same time the proportion of expenditure on alcohol declined. A number of factors led to the increase in alcohol consumed, particularly the huge growth in the numbers of people in the 18-25 age group and increased inward migration of adults (Finfacts Ireland, 2007). In 2003, 80% of alcohol consumed in Ireland was beer followed by wine at 8% cuder at 6% and spirits at 3%. Eurostat 2003 index figures show that Ireland is the most expensive country in the EU15 for alcholic drinks (CSG, 2007). The higher prices are due to four factors4:
Excise duties combined with a 21% VAT rate are a major component of the price of alcohol – up to 40% for beer and 55 per cent for spirits in 2003.
The Liquor licensing laws in place since 1902 control retailer entry into the market and at present no licence can be issued without another being extinguished. Licences are issued through courts and Revenue commissioners. With almost 80% of alcohol being sold on-trade this restrictive practice has done little to encourage innovation in the pub sector which in turn places little pressure on the supply chain.
The current alcohol licensing system specifies that to transfer a licence to a new pub, the owner must make a case that the new pub will not affect the viability of existing pubs in the area.
There is a concentration in the draught beer supply market with three large suppliers dominating (Diageo, Heineken and Beamish and Crawford). An increase in competition at retail level would lead to increased competition among suppliers.
Ireland and Alcohol – Social and cultural environment
Irish society has experienced tremendous progress in the last decade with rapid econmic growth. Along with this progress, there has been a major rise in alcohol consumption. Ireland has become one of the highest consumers of alcohol in the world. Between 1990 and 2002, alcohol consumption per capita increased by 41 per cent, the highest rate of increase in Europe. During this period, the number of alcohol related deaths also increased. A recent study showed that adults in Ireland had the highest reported consumption per drinker, the highest level of binge drinking and experienced more harm than other European countries. Binge drinking is the norm among Irish men, in that out of every 100 drinking occasions, 58 end up in binge drinking for men and 30 for women (Hope, 2004). In 2002, fewer children under 15 years, reported experimenting with alcohol, drinking on a regular basis or getting drunk compared to 1998 (Hope, 2004). Among 16 year olds, one in three were regular binge drinkers and one in four reported being drunk ten or more times in the last year.
In 2002, alcopops was the most popular drink among girls while beer continued to be the most popular drink among boys. It has been found that alcohol sport sponsorship, linking alcohol, masculinity and sport, attracts young males, the groups mostly likely to be high risk and heavy drinkers5. The introductionof alcopops in 1995, with a strong sweet taste, disguising the taste of alcohol, attracted many young people into alcohol. The more recent new alcohol products with high alcohol content provide for a quick and easy ‘fix’ of alcohol for those who are interested in getting drunk fast. In Ireland, alcohol advertising is governed by voluntary codes or self-regulation. In Ireland alcohol is easy to access, as there are at least 13,000 outlets that sell alcohol (Hope, 2004). Since the 1980s, alcohol has become more available by increases in the number of exemptions (later opening) and in the number of outlets (restaurants and clubs, off-licenses). Excise duty was increased on cider and spirits by Government in December 2001 and 2002 respectively. In 2002, cider sales decreased by -11.3 per cent, while wine and spirits increased and beer remained relatively stable. In 2003 following the tax increase on spirit products, spirits sales decreased by 20 per cent while wine sales increased (+8 per cent) and both beer (-2.5 per cent) and cider (+1 per cent) showed marginal changes6.
Competition in the Alcoholic Drinks Market in Ireland
Diageo Ireland Ltd and Heineken Ireland are rival domestic companies in the alcoholic drinks market of Ireland. Diageo Ireland Ltd is the dominating company with maximum volume sales in 2005. This was because it supplied illustrious brands such as Smirnoff Red, Baileys Irish Cream, Smirnoff Ice and Guinness. The company also dominated beer and RTDs/High-strength premixes and finished second in spirits and cider/perry. It also offered a number of wine brands, most notably Blossom Hill (Euromonitor International, 2003). The company is predicted to sell of Guinness brand as part of a wider effort to rationalise its portfolio.
This is seen as the time when large multinationals can buy local brands to complete their portfolios. But it is expected that there will be continuous shifting from the on-trade to the off-trade channel, making Ireland more in sync with the rest of its European Union neighbors. The off-trade distribution value share of specialists outlets will probably drop because lower prices often lead to consumers buying alcoholic drinks products at convenience stores, supermarkets and discounters outlets. There is also the probability that the government may introduce new regulations to curb excessive drinking.
Currently US is the main wine exporter to Ireland and holds about 12-percent share of the country’s imports and continue to grow.The success of U.S. wines in sustaining such a market shows that Ireland is still a good market for alcoholic drinks. According to Peter Dunne, director of Mitchell and Sons, one of the oldest wine stores in Dublin, Irish wine consumers, are be-coming more and more sophisticated and often seek out small U.S. boutique wines. Import and excise duties account for almost half of the retail price (Hanley, 2001).
Irish consumers are generally offered a wide choice of wines as they are always eager to try something new and different. Hence it is difficult to maintain brand loyalty or low price (Hanley, 2001). From the viewpoint of Australia, the main competition will be from the EU, US and New Zealand. Strong marketing by Chile and even more so by South Africa during the past few years have increased their market shares (Wetzel, 2004). In fact, Irish beer distributors continue to seek out new brands, especially those aimed at niche markets. Potential exists for microbreweries to enter the market–and there is also interest in low-alcohol and non-alcoholic beers (Hanley, 2001).
Grocery retailing in Ireland has for years been structured around major supermarket chains in major cities, with smaller groceries in villages and neighborhoods. With modernization, many of the retail markets are under the control of supermarket chains and independent stores, operating under a franchise group name. Retailers generally use an importer to bring the world to their customers. Strong marketing by Chilean and especially South African labels during the past few years resulted in increased market shares for these wines. Exporters should also note that as excise duties are quite high in Ireland, an inexpensive wine at winery level might in fact become relatively expensive when it reaches retail level. Currently, as a result of a relatively low price and high income elasticities of demand for alcoholic beverages, the high level of taxation of alcohol in Ireland has resulted in an exceptionally large proportion of income being devoted to purchasing them rather than to a fall in their consumption.
Marketing Mix
Marketing can be viewed as a set of functions that include product development, packaging, pricing, advertising, selling, distribution and customer service. This process can be studied under two phases: a strategic and a tactical phase. The strategic phase has three components: segmentation, targeting, and positioning. The tactical phase is the one that includes designing and implementing various tactics to achieve the formulated strategy. These tactics are also referred to as the “4Ps”: product, place, promotion, and price. (Kotler, 2003). A comprehensive marketing strategy is one that addresses all components of the “Marketing Mix”. In order to market any product in any market, a marketing strategy is implemented through decisions regarding the elements of the marketing mix that are also known as ‘controlled variables’ of marketing. The product refers to the physical product or the service offered to the consumer. Marketers can strategically adjust certain product characteristics such as the taste, effect, quality, appearance, packaging and brand. The second variable, price, deals with financial considerations such as profit margin, competitor pricing, and discounts. Place variable deals with channels of distribution including the supply chain, market coverage and various service levels (Novak, 2004). Promotion decisions includes advertising, personal selling, media, public relations and budget. In the alcoholic beverages industry, a mature and highly competitive market, companies need to offer the appropriate marketing mix based on the country and its unique set of characteristics.
In the alcoholic drinks industry, the products need to be varied and cater to a wide range of people. There is a segment that desires vodka and another segment desiring the finest wines. While some people prefer low priced items there are also connoisseurs looking out for expensive brands. The trend in Ireland for the present is towards health promotion. Hence it is essential that the carbohydrate content of alcoholic products should be kept minimum. Regarding the place variable, alcoholic products are now sought as both low price items in supermarkets and as branded exclusive products from pubs. The fourth variable, Price again depends on the economy. Right now Ireland can deal with both low-price items and branded expensive items. When it comes to promotion, Ireland now has the most comprehensive pre-clearance system for all alcohol advertising, through the operation of Central Copy Clearance Ireland. This system assures that there is compliance with relevant codes for all drinks advertising. The print and broadcast media have also agreed to comply with CCCI (Ricard, 2007). The government of Ireland has endorsed a set of voluntary codes in 2005. These codes compliment the ASAI content code and specifically address the placement and volume of alcohol advertising and sponsorship, with a view to limiting the exposure of young people to alcohol marketing. MEAS (Mature Enjoyment of Alcohol in Society) is another organization in Ireland formed in 2003 to ensure that the drinks industry acts with social responsibility (Ricard, 2007). Heineken as a brand is very successful in Ireland according to Graham Nolan, business development manager at McCann Erickson. Nolan feels that Irish agencies have a different way of looking at things and multinational brands need to promote their products creatively in order to be successful in marketing (Adworld, 2006). Outstanding creative work for beer brands has included Carlsberg, through OwensDDB, a local advertising company in Ireland. Another Dutch beer brand DDFH&B also uses local advertisers who are familiar with Irish ironic humour. As Nolan puts it: ” Irish beer drinkers, in particularly like and welcome a different type of creative using a bit of wit and humour” (Adworld, 2006). Moreover, it is imperative that there should be increased sensitivity in implementing marketing strategies. Because of the restrictions, the marketing should be careful not to cross the line. According to an old-timer, the marketing must demonstrate that all you are trying to do is switch drinkers from one brand to another and not try to consume more of one brand or binge drink (Adworld, 2006). Moreover, sports cannot be used for promoting alcoholic drinks in Ireland because sports are connected with young people who need to be shielded from such promotions of alcoholic products. Hence other media such as arts, music and film are being increasingly used to promote alcoholic products. Stella Artois has used film sponsorhip and Heineken has used music. A Stella Artois promotion, offered drinkers the chance to win tickets to see Alcatraz, the movie inside Alcatraz, the San Francisco prison (Adworld, 2006).
Ireland is a good place for marketing materials. The global marketing team for Baileys and its creative talent operate from Diageo in Dublin and the CSR campaign Don’t See A Good Night Wasted commercial, was also developed here. There are also plans to do a number of foreign language voiceovers and show it in other non-English speaking markets (Adworld, 2006).
Branding of Alcoholic Products
In concentrated industries such as the alcohol industry, marketing is best done through effective advertising rather than pricing. A highly concentrated industry is characterized by a small number of relatively large firms. Brand equity refers to the collective positive associations that individuals have about a brand. Firms with higher levels of brand equity will have higher sales because they provide consumers with higher levels of utility. The creation of a new brand involves three steps: market segmentation, the creation of a branded product and the creation of new advertising for the brand, with content targeted at the intended market segment. Market segmentation can be based on geography, demographics, behavior or psycho-graphics. In the case of Ireland, the market for alcoholic products should be segmented on the basis of demographics and psycho-graphics.
Mode of Entry
The different modes of entry into a market would include exporting, entering through turnkey projects, licensing, franchising, joint ventures, and through wholly owned subsidiaries. Exporting involves high transportation costs, ability to withstand competition from low cost manufacturers, high transportation costs, and tariff barriers. In case of turnkey projects, its important to take care that this does not mean loss of technology or imply selling of competitive advantage. Cross-border licensing involves legal barriers. Franchising needs a high degree of quality control. High costs and risks are associated with joint ventures and wholly own subsidiaries. Major entry barriers in Ireland include high capital requirements, economies of scale, patents, and licensing requirements, scarce locations, raw materials or distributors and reputation requirements. Big companies, by virtue of their high capital structure, are able to acquire patents and licenses, meet high investment costs in case of transport or raw materials or distribution costs, and by virtue of their reputation and superior branding infrastructure, are able to overcome these barriers to entry.
In the context of entering the alcoholic drinks industry in Ireland, its better to market the product through an existing domestic supplier who is more knowledgeable regarding promotions and distribution.
SWOT Analysis of Ireland Market for Alcoholic Products
Strengths
Ireland has a rich tradition of good alcohol consumption.
Currently, Ireland has a stable economy.
New segments have opened up – such as teenagers and women – in the Irish market for Alcoholic products.
Weakness
Ireland is a small country with a small population.
It has companies that manufacture alcoholic products domestically.
Irish people have a different viewpoint when it comes to advertising and relate best to ads that have a bit of Irish humor and wit alone.
Opportunities
A huge demand for new varieties of alcoholic products especially with low carbohydrate content.
Greater demand for wine varieties especially red wine.
Domestic companies are giving up some of their products.
Ireland has a history of trade with developed countries.
Retailers generally use an importer to bring the world to their customers. This can be used to advantage.
Threats
Increasing health awareness. Industry executives consider ‘increased health consciousness’ to be the greatest threat to alcoholic drinks over the next 5 years. Consumers are choosing to moderate their drinking, impacting volume sales projections to 2010 (Business Wire, 2007).
Increasing regulations and codes for advertising alcoholic products. Restrictions on advertising are deemed by industry experts to be the second greatest threat to the industry between now and 2010 (Business Wire, 2007).
Competition from local companies.
International competition from US and New Zealand.
Recommendations
The following recommendations may be made to the Australian company seeking to enter the Ireland alcoholic drinks market.
Extensive market research should be carried out before identifying target population groups and their favorite alcoholic products.
The product should preferably be positioned as a healthy alternative to traditional alcoholic products.
The products should be sold through off-trade markets.
The pricing should be competitive.
The focus should be on giving new varieties of alcoholic products with minimal alcohol content, carbohydrate content and good quality.
A local company should be employed for promotion purposes.
Building brand equity is very important to cater to the well-to-do population in Ireland.
Marketing efforts of exporters should also include point of sale material, which helps consumers focus attention on labels. Many wineries also include marketing promotions such as competitions to gain a customer base especially for wines at the inexpensive sector of the market.
Conclusion
Ireland is the most expensive country in the EU15 for alcoholic beverages. Indirect taxes such as excise duty and VAT are major components of the final price of an alcoholic product and entry inot the on-trade market place is restricted by the Liquor Licensing Laws. Hence, there are many challenges to be met for an Australian company to break into the Ireland Alcoholic Drinks Market. The best option is to enter the off-trade market place and position the product as a healthy alternative to traditional alcoholic products. There is also competition among exporters the main competition coming from other EU countries, Chile, South Africa, US and New Zealand. Depending on the ability of the Australian company to meet the competition and counter the risks of entering the Alcoholic Drinks Market in Ireland, the company should make its decision.
Bibliography
Wetzel, Hayden (2004). Ireland Country Commercial Guide.
Euromonitor International (2006). Alcoholic Drinks in Ireland.
Linda’s has been operating in the NAB market for a comparatively short time. However, it has already established itself as a strong and efficient organization. Nevertheless, the entrepreneurship clearly needs further expansion. The company’s current vision implies catering to the needs of all stakeholders involved, with a particularly strong effect on customers and employees.
Non-alcoholic Beverage Industry Trends and Justification
Industry Trends
The NAB industry has been experiencing consistent growth over the past few decades, with a range of new products emerging on a regular basis. Even though the environment is currently dominated by large organizations such as Coca-Cola and Pepsi (The consumer goods industry in the United States, 2015), the target area is open to innovative products and provides the environment that new organizations with original products will feel inclined to explore.
According to the latest trends in the identified market, the global beverage sales made 994.1 bln l in 2015 (Statista, 2015), making a total of 3.8% of the global beverage sales (Statista, 2015). Although the identified percentage might be viewed as rather small, it, in fact, points to the opportunities for expanding that the NAB market is facing. The changes in the product price (see Fig. 1), however, show that Linda’s will have to be creative with its financial resources distribution given the plans for discounts and moderate prices.
It should also be borne in mind that the target industry can be defined as rather profitable. For instance, recent data on the progress of Coca-Cola shows that the organization gained the total of $67,749,000,000 in the target market. It could be argued that the identified organization has taken a monopoly over the identified environment. However, the industry offers a plethora of options for new entrants (Bailey, 2014).
Beverage Justification
The primary reason for choosing soda is that ti is one of the most common NABs purchased by people of all ages. In addition, the array of flavors that can be included in the drink is truly ample. Finally, the fact that the soda industry is becoming increasingly more profitable (Statista, 2015) deserves to be mentioned.
Company Strategic Position
Age-based strategic positioning seems to be the most sensible approach to adopt concerns culture-based positioning. With a strong emphasis on enhancement of healthy drinks, the product must appeal to the people that are concerned with their health and wellbeing.
Company Distribution Channels
The distribution channels will consist primarily of two levels. Specifically, the two-level channels will include a wholesaler and a retailer, the latter being the key link between Linda’s and the end customer. The drink will be sold in local stores, malls, bars, etc.
Risk Assessment
Identified Risks
The disapproval of the FDA is the primary concern for the entrepreneurship. In addition, the risks related to the competition rates are very high. Finally, the organization may suffer from the inability to distribute the resources accordingly.
Risk Mitigation Plan
A consistent and rigid control over the production processes, as well as high quality standards, will help avoid conflicts with the FDA. Taking a unique niche (i.e., producing healthy soda drinks with unique flavors) will allow for avoiding rivalry with Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, etc. The sustainability principles coupled with the Lean Management framework for waste reduction will serve as the foundation for addressing the resources distribution concern.
SWOT Analysis
A unique product that will help build brand recognition instantly is the primary strength of the organization. In addition, Linda’s will be based on a set of standards promoting not only customer satisfaction but also catering to the needs of employees. As a result, the latter are likely to excel in their performance and deliver the product of the finest quality possible. Moreover, the prerequisites for a sustainable use of resources and waste reduction will help increase revenues instantly. The entrenched competition rates, in their turn, can be viewed as the primary concern for Linda’s.
The lack of experience in addressing the subject matter, in its turn, clearly is the greatest weakness to be addressed. However, the company is facing an abundance of opportunities, the environmentalist-related niche being the key one to consider. Indeed, while several organizations operate in the identified realm, very few make healthy characteristics of their soda drinks as the selling point. Linda’s, on the contrary, is going to become a one-of-a-kind company that is likely to gain competitive advantage comparatively easily.
Naturally, Linda’s will face a range of threats in the target environment. For instance, the emergence of copycats or the firms that will use the same concept of healthiness is very likely as it is bound to attract a lot of people. Moreover, the possibly low quality of the companies that will create similar drinks may make a bad impression of Linda’s production, casting a shadow on the firm’s goods. Wholesalers may feel reluctant to purchase the drink that seems to be very similar to others, including Coca-Cola, Mountain Dew, etc.
Despite the issues outlined above, Linda’s products are likely to become instantly recognizable and well enjoyed among the target audience due to the advantages that the firm has. With an effective promotion campaign, the entrepreneurship must gain weight in the target market quite fast. Maintaining quality standards high and making decisions based on the firm’s values, its members are bound to be successful.