Adoption Problem Solution Essay

Introduction

The reason I picked this question is because of my cousin. She was adopted by my aunt and uncle when she was about 7 years old. A few years in she started to show signs of a mental disorder. After a few doctor’s appointments, she was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Ever since then, I have always wondered if being adopted had anything to do with it. I also wondered if other children are being affected by mental illnesses because of their adoption. Does it have anything to do with their new families? These are some of the things I am hoping to learn the answer to.

Findings

Margaret A. Keyes, Anu Sharma, Irene J. Elkins, William G. Iacono, And Matt McGue assessed from 1994 to 2004. Their objective was to determine whether adopted youth are at excess risk for clinically relevant behavioral and emotional problems. Their results showed that adoptees scored only moderately higher than non-adoptees on quantitative measures of mental health. So what causes the mental health problems to increase if they are an adoptee? According to most websites I have done research on, the reason for it to be increased varies between the type of adoptions but some reasons can be Stress during pregnancy, Neglect/abuse, or genetics.

An unprofessional name for the emotional effects is Adopted child syndrome. The symptoms of this are ​Low self-esteem, Depression, Anxiety, depressive disorder, and Separation anxiety disorder. This results in ​Developmental Delays: ​Adopted children could reach physical and emotional development milestones late. They may not be able to do things that kids of their age usually do, or they may think and behave younger than their age. ​Eating Disorders: ​Their pre-adoption life makes children anxious eaters. They may have grown up under circumstances where food was scarce.

Solutions and problems

Adoption at different ages is an issue. The emotional effects can be a lot different for a child adopted at the age of 1 than a child adopted at 15. Nearly 271,833 were adopted in the world over the past few years. Out of these adoptions, about 100,000 of them were less than 1 year old but there were only 41,318 that were between the ages of 5 and 12. Children between 5 and 12 are just discovering themselves. If they are in an orphanage during these years, it is hard for them. That is one of the reasons people adopt them when they are younger because they want to be able to raise them during the crucial years of their life. But, that ends up leaving thousands of children in the orphanage. One way we can fix this is by having a children’s home. This would be a home for orphans or foster kids between the ages of 5-18. This house will provide a place for kids to grow and learn. ​It would not be a strict place, it would be a place where kids and teens can feel loved and cared for. It would have staff that comes in shifts and a head of house, who will be in charge of the children. The staff and Heads of the house would be there to fill the place of parents and family. We could have family rooms. These would be for the children who have siblings or a single parent who wants to live with them. Children could still be adopted while they were at this house. This house could fix the problem by giving kids the space and materials needed to discover themselves.

Opinion (my opinion how has it changed I did and still do believe that there are emotional effects on adoptees. Of course, adoptees are going to have these emotional problems because it is stressful to move houses as it is but just imagine having to move house without your family and move into a whole different family. I now also think that there are circumstances that affect them. Age, family, and process of adoption are just some of these circumstances. For example, if a child is born then is put up for adoption the next day then gets adopted just hours later, his emotional effects are, most probably, not as strong as a child who spends half of his childhood in an orphanage and then gets adopted and moved to a new place. If a child loses her parents and then gets adopted, she will not only have trauma from losing her parents but she will also have the stress of moving to a new environment.

I think that it is unfair to adoptees because they can’t control who they go to or how they are treated. I think that the adoption agency should put more thought into who they are sending where because where they send them can affect the child in different ways. If you send a Muslim child to a Christian neighborhood there would be a huge after-effect.

Summary and conclusions

There are emotional effects of adoption on adoptees. Adoptees have a higher chance of developing these emotions. There is also a different effect depending on their new family or location. It is not only child adoptees but adults who also have been affected because of their adoption. They could feel abandoned or feel like their family did not want them. Adults also can project their feelings onto others which will make it so their adoption will affect everyone around them. I have learned that orphanages or adoption agencies should pay more attention to the children they are adopting out and where they are going. If they used my idea of a Children’s home it could fix the problem of children not being adopted during their crucial years by giving them space and time to grow. This is important because I think that the percentage of adoptees with mental disorders will go down if they can discover themselves in a safe environment.

In conclusion, children are fragile and if they go through a traumatic experience they are even more fragile. We need to pay more attention to adoptees and be mindful of where they are coming from and what they have been through.

Sources

    1. http://archive.pov.org/offandrunning/fact-sheet/
    2. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/adopt_ref/adoption-statistics.html
    3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475346/
    4. http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/04/13/children.adoption.mental.health/index.html
    5. https://creatingafamily.org/adoption-category/mental-health-issues-with-adopted-children/
    6. https://adoption.org/psychological-emotional-effects-can-adopted-children-suffer
    7. https://www.mentalhelp.net/articles/long-term-issues-for-the-adopted-child/
    8. https://www.momjunction.com/articles/adopted-child-syndrome_00375730/#gref
    9. https://partnersforourchildren.org/blog/what-does-age-have-do-adoption-0
    10. https://adoptionnetwork.com/adoption-statistics
    11. http://archive.pov.org/offandrunning/fact-sheet/
    12. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/Intercountry-Adoption/adopt_ref/adoption-statistics.html
    13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475346/
    14. http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/04/13/children.adoption.mental.health/index.html
    15. https://creatingafamily.org/adoption-category/mental-health-issues-with-adopted-children/
    16. https://adoption.org/psychological-emotional-effects-can-adopted-children-suffer
    17. https://www.mentalhelp.net/articles/long-term-issues-for-the-adopted-child/
    18. https://www.momjunction.com/articles/adopted-child-syndrome_00375730/#gref
    19. https://partnersforourchildren.org/blog/what-does-age-have-do-adoption-0
    20. https://adoptionnetwork.com/adoption-statistics

 

Argumentative Essay on Adoption of Animals

Why You Should Adopt & Not Shop

Specific Purpose: My goal is to persuade my audience to adopt their next/new pet(s) from a local shelter rather than purchasing from a breeder/puppy mill or pet store.

Thesis Statement: By adopting a pet from a shelter rather than purchasing one from a store/breeder you not only help stop puppy mills but you are helping to save a pet’s life, save money, and help that pet with emotional stability.

Introduction:

Attention Getter: Have you been to a puppy mill, pet store, or even a breeder? Have you seen some of the conditions that these places are in? Many times walking into these places animals are packed in like sardines in some of the worst possible ways. Animals are bred multiple times a year at which point their bodies are so exhausted that they are put to death or die from the extensive conditions surrounding them.1

Credibility Statement: I have adopted two dogs from my local animal shelter. I’ve always been that one person who had to have a purebred dog no matter the cost. However, my husband took me to our local shelter and to breeders to find that one I had been wanting. Seeing the conditions of some of the breeders and then seeing the local shelter I just knew that adoption was best for me.

Relating to the Audience: Almost everyone wants a pet no matter the kind. But for those who get a pet look at the cost, characteristics of the pet, demeanor, and overall health.

Thesis Statement: By adopting a pet from a shelter rather than purchasing one from a store/breeder you not only help stop puppy mills but also help to save a pet’s life, save money, and help that pet with emotional stability.

Preview: In this report, I will talk with you about how adopting your new or next fur baby is so much better than purchasing them from a store, breeder, or puppy mill. I will explain the financial side of adopting, the death rate in the U.S. if animals are not adopted, overcrowding in shelters, and how a pet from a shelter or humane society can change you.

Signpost: Now I will explain the financial burden that comes with purchasing an animal rather than adopting them.

Body:

When you adopt a pet there is a fee that varies from free to a few hundred dollars. The fee associated with adoption is not for the pet itself but rather to help cover the cost the agency paid for on spay/neuter, vaccinations (some cases microchipping-pending on if the agency does this or not), and also housebreaking/training expenses pending on how to hold the pet is.

A. Your local Animal Shelter/Humane Society is a great place to purchase your first or next companion.

    1. Animal Shelters are not in it for profit but rather the animals are their number one priority.
        1. Veterinary wellness visits and exams $50-100
        2. Spaying or neutering $150-300
        3. Distemper vaccination $20-30×2
        4. Rabies vaccination $15-25
        5. Heartworm test (for dogs) $15-35
        6. Feline Leukemia/FIV test (for cats) $30-50
        7. Flea/tick treatment $50-200
        8. Microchip $50
        9. Deworming $20-50
        10. Collar and an identification tag $ 5-105 adoption fees are a way to help cover the medical cost of the animal while they wait for their new home as well as food and transportation costs. The fees associated with adoption help provide care not only to the animal being adopted but also to the other animals as well. The cost of these particular fees is a lot higher than any adoption fee.
    2. In addition, some adoption fees can be outrageous amount, however, a lot of agencies reduce the cost of adoption fees pending the age of the pet, the length of time the animal has been in the shelter, and in some cases give the animals away for free due to overpopulation.
    3. As a customer shopping around for a pet, most of the time you want a purebred animal with papers. It has been misconstrued over the years that you can only get a purebred from a breeder or a puppy mill. However, according to the Humane Society of the United States, 25% of pets in shelters are of a pure bloodline.2

B. Unfortunately, many animals are still bought from breeders and puppy mills.

    1. According to the Humane Society, puppy mills are inhumane breeding facilities in which the health of the animals is disregarded so they can maximize profit with a low overhead.2
    2. Due to puppy mills trying to maximize their profit, the animals are the ones who suffer. They tend to be deformed or have health issues due to improper care.
    3. Puppy mill costs range due to the type of animal and the location. However, once the animal is bought a lot of the time the new owner is hit with drastic veterinarian bills due to the poor health of the pet, and sometimes the pet winds up dying. Therefore, you are out of money from the purchase, medical bills, and the animal (puppy mills do not guarantee a health record for animals sold).
    4. Breeders are known as people who raise livestock or pets. They raise animals to cultivate new breeds or sustain the same kind.
    5. Generally, breeders take care of the animals by keeping track of their diet, vet records, and the overall cleanliness of the area.
    6. Just like puppy mills breeder costs can be very expensive. However, depending on the breeder you can get your pet with its first set of shots (vet record), microchipped, and sometimes a 30-day health guarantee.

Directional transition: Now that you understand the financial aspect of adoption vs. purchasing, I will explain the death rate in the U.S. and how overpopulation contributes to this.

According to the ASPCA, approximately 6.5 million animals find themselves placed in an animal shelter within the U.S.3

A. Animal shelters/humane societies are faced with many different challenges; caring for pets, rehoming pets and the biggest challenge of all would be to euthanize the pet.

    1. On average, roughly 1.5 million animals are euthanized each year in the U.S.3
    2. Often animals are euthanized for illness or aggression, however, the main reason for an animal to be euthanized would be due to overpopulation.
    3. Animals (strays) who come to a shelter from the streets are held for 72 hours and are then euthanized; this is in part to keep the space open. In some cases, shelters can hold a pet a little longer.

B. Millions of animals suffer each year at the hands of senseless people just for a profit.

    1. Approximately 170,000 dogs are bred each year in the U.S. This amount could be higher because puppy mills and oftentimes breeders do not report their stock.4
    2. Each female animal produces roughly 9 offspring every year and sometimes twice a year. Due to the conditions of mills or breeder areas, some of the puppies die within a few days due to the mother being malnourished or exhausted.4

Directional transition: Now that you understand the death rate and how overpopulation contributes to this I will now tell you the joys of having an adopted pet from a shelter.

Animals are just looking for someone to be a companion to and love forever.

A. Many animals are in shelters due to a human issue like a move or divorce not because they were aggressive.2

    1. Depending on the age of the pet, you can adopt an animal that is already housebroken.
    2. The animals who only know what the inside of a kennel is like are looking for someone to love. They tend to be the ones that have the best demeanor when it comes to cuddling.
    3. You will save a life knowing that you kept that pet from being euthanized.
    4. Dogs have a way of sensing things about situations or people, therefore, if you adopt a pet rather than buying one you give that animal a sense of gratefulness and love they had not known previously.
    5. As a pet owner, you become more social due to training or walks which then makes you happier because you see your dog is great with interacting with others and dogs but you also make a new friend as well.
    6. You have many options at a shelter to choose from. Breeders and puppy mills are limited to what they breed specifically.
    7. The last thing, you have gained a new friend/companion for life.

B. Everyone can help make a difference!

    1. Spread the word to everyone and tell them where you got your new pup or kitten.
    2. Before buying a new pet just check out your local shelters or humane societies because you never know, that purebred you thought you wanted might not be the one.

Transition: Now that you understand the financial aspect, the death rate, and the joys of adoption, I will now conclude my speech.

Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Adopting a pet from a shelter rather than purchasing one from a store/breeder not only helps stop puppy mills but also helps to save a pet’s life, save money, and help that pet with emotional stability.

Summary of Main Points:

    • a. As an animal lover myself, I find these findings to be very beneficial when I go to look for a new companion. I want to give my new pet a chance at life while giving them the love and care they deserve.
    • b. Shelters want what is best for the animal; puppy mills/breeders oftentimes can care less. The main focus of a shelter is to find a home, not a death sentence.
    • c. When you adopt your next pet, remember you are helping to keep the overcrowding of animals down. This in turn helps to keep animals from being euthanized.
    • d. Animals need to know they are wanted and loved.

Closing Statement: There is no logical reason why animals have to suffer at the hands of people. For some, animals are not just pets, they are family. We should all have that mentality and if we did we could all stop the purchasing of animals and just adopt. Puppy mills are notorious for the caring of financial gain over the animal whereas the shelters are looking to rehome the animal. Choose to adopt and not shop!

References

    1. 10 Things To Know About Puppy Mills | Facts and Statistics. (2013). Retrieved October 24, 2013, from Madonna of the Mills A Documentary About Puppy Mills: http://madonnaofthemills.com/puppy-mills/
    2. 2.) “Adopting from an Animal Shelter or Rescue Group.” The Humane Society of the United States, https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/adopting-animal-shelter-or-rescue-group.
    3. 3.) “Pet Statistics.” ASPCA, https://www.aspca.org/animal-homelessness/shelter-intake-and-surrender/pet-statistics.
    4. 4.) Sentient MediaSentient Media editorial. “Puppy Mills: Millions of Dogs Suffer Needlessly to Create Pets.” Reporting on Animals, Animal Rights, and Human Choices -, 24 Oct. 2019, https://sentientmedia.org/puppy-mills/.
    5. 5.) “What Is Included in an Adoption Fee?” Petfinder, https://www.petfinder.com/pet- adoption/pet-adoption-information/what-is-included-in-an-adoption-fee/.

Gay Adoption Persuasive Essay

Homosexuality was a foreign topic until 1900’s; to the majority of people, eventually, due to an expanding number of individuals openly declaring their sexuality, people started to become familiar with the existence of such. Along with this rise in number, questions and controversial viewpoints regarding this subject also increased. According to, the ‘Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender,’ Homosexuality is simply the quality of being sexually attracted to people of the same sex. However, to accurately represent those who are sexually oriented in different ways, much more specific terms are used. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer are a few examples. The abbreviation LGBTQ is used as an umbrella term, referring to them as a whole (New York University).

Even at present, accepting the LGBTQ Community and giving them their right to live amongst the society as one, has been quite a debate amongst most individuals and approximately 165 countries (ABC News). Although the positive attitude shown towards them by open-minded people and supportive countries, the negative perspective of other persons and conservative countries, puts a strain on the LGBTQ community, as there seems to be no end to them being harassed for deviating from society’s assumed norms. Thereby, this composition will concentrate on the LGBTQ Community of Taiwan, the first-ever country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriages, particularly focusing on the problems the LGBTQ dealt with, Taiwan’s motive to legalize, the result of the new law, and Asia’s point of view towards this matter.

Homosexual Discrimination

People tend to feel the constant need to fit into society’s cultural regulations because failing to do so would expose them to being looked down upon by the public (Beyond Blue 2019). Such is a case most LGBTQ people face; unable to meet the convention of being male or female or retain the traditional ways men and women are recognized to be. This puts them under the pressure of being the bait of persecution. Regardless of the position where a country stands in terms of legalization; the community continues to face harassment and discrimination such as being refused employment at workplaces and being physically abused by biased people. (Beyond Blue 2019)

Society’s Perception

Taiwan also known as the Republic of China (Breen et al., 2013, p.6), as the name suggests, adheres to the constitutional laws set by China, and also shares a similar culture. Dating back to the 1970’s it was a traditional belief in the Chinese culture, that nuptials could take place only between the opposite genders (Hung, 2018). Due to most not deviating from their customs, and only a minute number of differently sexually oriented persons present in society, most people were not familiar with the term homosexual (Damm, 2005, p.68). It is said that the publication of the book ‘Crystal Boys,’ by Pai Hsien-yung, was what initially educated most of Taiwan on male homosexuality (Huang, 2011, pg.2), and eventually, through other resources such as commercials (Tin 2008), the LGBTQ became known. This acquired knowledge was not widely accepted, and various factors may have influenced one’s opinion. A study that was carried out on the attitude of nurses in Taiwan towards lesbian and gay individuals, clarified the point that certain factors contribute to how they would act towards minor sexualities. The results revealed that nurses who had worked longer and were religious were not in support of LGBTQ and did not show interest in providing care to people with different sexual and gender orientations. On the other hand, nurses who are related to homosexual people, and have higher degrees tended to provide more care to the LGBTQ and support those persons (Yen, et al, 2007). Taking into consideration these factors, we could further make clear that the previously mentioned point is valid, as there is distinct evidence proving the link. For example, nurses who owned higher degrees had positive attitudes towards the LGBTQ, speaking in general terms; more educated people are more likely to have an open mind. Facts like these contribute to the society’s understanding and willingness to accept the LGBTQ, due to this reason it could be seen that with time, there has been an increase in tolerance towards this subject in Taiwan (Cheng, et al, 2016).

Religion’s Perspective

One of the major topics that influence one’s opinion on homosexuality is religion. Taiwan is a country that is very liberal to different cultures and religions, thus embodying a nation of believers of diverse religions (Hays, 2015). It could be seen that 35.1% of Taiwanese follow Buddhism, 33.0% Taoism, and although not a religion but merely a way of life and an ancient ethical concept, Confucianism, is also pursued (World Population Review 2019; Scroope, 2016). Other minor religious ethnicities such as Christians and Muslims also make up the community (Hays, 2015).

The Buddhism that is practiced in Taiwan is known as Mahayana Buddhism (Chen 2011, pg 27). According to the monk Master Hsing Yun’s writing about one of the basic texts of Mahayana Buddhism (Robinson, 2010), he states homosexuality is not misconduct and it is people need to learn to tolerate all sorts of human behaviors. In addition to that statement, an analysis of Buddhism and homosexuality (Silva, 2013; O’Brien 2018), further clarifies that, due to the topic of homosexuality not being emphasized or explicitly mentioned in Buddha’s discourses, it is interpreted that homosexuality can be taken into understanding the same way heterosexuality is. It has also been stated that certain acts, however, need to be avoided not because they are wrong in ethical terms, but rather for the reasons that these acts may lead to social disapproval or be a legal offense. Considering this point, it could be evaluated that, homosexuality, although itself not a violation of the principles of Buddhism, is yet a wrongdoing according to Taiwan, as it is a state of being that is disregarded by the society and a violation of the law. Taoism on the other hand, does not mention anything of expressing disapproval to people of different sexual orientations or preferences. A citizen was said to have stated that homosexuality is against Taoism, as it goes against the natural order of the world. To clarify the authenticity of this statement a question was posed to a well-renowned author of the genre Tao, to which he replied, that the subject of gender is not what Taoism looks into, instead, it is the spiritual nature of love and kindness that the religion focuses on, therefore it is no sin (Lin, 2014). The sacred texts of the Bible, followed by the Christians, condemn sexual acts between men while the Quran, clearly mentions that sexual activity between the genders of the same sex is forbidden (Hildebrandt, 2014).

On the whole, the conclusion that can be drawn is that not every person is pious, and religious concepts are not always considered when making decisions to support or go against the LGBTQ. In addition, most of the general public who lean toward being devoted to the customs of one’s religion, has a level of tendency to misconceptualize the actual teachings of one’s faith and may arrive at a faulty belief. Consequently, according to Taiwan’s religions, it could be seen that these religions are very much tolerant towards the LGBTQ community, and the impact religion has on shaping people’s thoughts is quite low, this leads to the interpretation that there are larger factors that contribute to the attitudes of the community’s judgment.

The Path to Legalisation

The LGBTQ movement began after the uplift of martial law, around the 1990’s. Since then the LGBTQ community has been fighting for their rights, by trying to pass bills and hosting Pride events to give voice to their rights. The initial LGBT movement was the founding of the lesbian group, ‘Between Us’ in the 1900s and thereafter in 1998 the first legally registered LGBTQ organization, called the ‘Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association’ came into existence (Gil. D. L. 2013). The first gay parade was held in 2003 and since then Pride events have been held annually (gay star news), Taiwan is known to have held the largest Pride event in Asia as of October 27th, 2018 till date (nst.com).

Referendum

The battle to instill change in the marriage equality law had been a tough course as the LGBTQ community had to face many obstacles from the opposition crowd to successfully fulfill their objective. The first legal attempt to amend the law was in 2003 and the second in 2005, but unfortunately these proposals were rejected (gay star news). Despite the adverse response, the LGBTQ and the Democratic Progressive Party or DPP (a political party) continued to put forward bills, and some of these bills passed on the first reading. However, a bill needs to go through at least three readings before it can come into effect (foucustaiwan). This was a difficult task to achieve as there was always some sort of hindrance that prevented the bills from passing. The situation in 2012 is a perfect example of the previous statement; when the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Partnership Rights (an organization that seeks to provide people the rights and protection they deserve), proposed a draft requesting to amend the law on marriage, on behalf of the LGBTQ, it was passed by the judicial court in 2013. But the hopes of those who looked forward to the change were soon diminished, because the anti-LGBTQ groups spread videos about how sexually transmitted diseases could increase following the change, and organized mass rallies voicing out their disapproval in 2013 leading the court to question their consent (international Rocky).

In addition to bills, polls, and referendums were also conducted to take note of the public’s opinion regarding same-sex marriages so that the Legislative Yuan of Taiwan could consider these votes when making a decision. Polls were held both privately and publicly and the results are as follows.

As for the results of the polls, the percentage of people who agree to the change in law can be seen to increase from the year 2012 to 2015, where 2015 has the highest voting for support. The increase in voting could be due to reasons such as more education regarding gender and equality and a higher percentage of voters belonging to the middle-aged category. This increase however takes a whole new turn in the polls held in the years 2016 and 2018, where a sudden decrease in supporters can be seen. According to (Taiwan. insight) Rich T. S. et al (2019), the explanation given for this sudden change is that the 2018 referendum was hosted by the political party Kuomintang of China (KMT) which is against the amendment of the marriage law. The measures that were taken by these anti-LGBTQ communities such as spreading negative information like family structure being distorted and how there will be an increase in HIV/ AIDS had a larger impact on individuals than the message that lacked clarity given by the DPP.

Establishing the New Law

Regardless of the referendums and public rallies that took place, on the 17th of May 2019, Taiwan’s Legislative Court passed the bill on same-sex marriage officially legalizing it and officially going into effect on the 24th of May 2019 (CNN). It is this very judicial triumph that the LGBTQ have been restless to achieve. As mentioned before the initiative to amend the law began in 2003 but only in 2017 did the court begin considering it. On the 24th of May 2017, the Constitutional Court gave a verdict stating that refusing two people of the same gender to marry violates their right to equality and their legal right to marry, thus paving the path to Taiwan being the first country in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage (Researchgate LGBT rights in Taiwan). Taiwan’s legislature was given a two-year deadline by which it must enact legislation to allow same-sex marriage (qz.com). This was completed by 2019, renewing the lives of the LGBTQ community, as they are now endowed with the freedom of marital fulfillment.

Impacts of Legalisation

Revolution

The revolutionary movement made by Taiwan has set an example to many other nations, as to how governing bodies of a country could always stand up for the minority, and consider referendums as means of public opinion, but not take action based on the choice of the majority especially if they are discriminatory (Knight K. 2019). This celebratory law has opened up new doors of freedom and opportunity. However, this decree only agrees to grant the LGBTQ the liberty of marriage and prohibits the Taiwanese from getting married to persons from foreign countries. In addition to that, they also have limited rights when it comes to adoption; same-sex couples can only adopt if the child is a biological offspring of one of the partners (Tang W. A. et al, 2019). These privileges not being granted to the LGBTQ does appear to be a little unjust, but it could be justified by understanding that allowing international marriage may lead to conflicts between countries if the countries have no law that approves of same-sex marriages. Also, the limitation of adoption, as stated by Professor Perreau B. could be vindicated by regarding his point of view in which he questions the action of adoption itself. He states;

“Under the new legal regime, same-sex married couples will only have a limited access to adoption, that of the biological child of one of the spouses. The number of children available for adoption has indeed dramatically decreased worldwide over the past fifteen years. In this context, gay adoption is often regarded as competing with adoption by heterosexual parents. Also, the adoption of non-biological children raises an even broader question: isn’t the family, whether based on biology or not, always already a choice? This viewpoint has major political consequences since the sense of belonging to a nation is itself based on metaphors of the family. This is why opening adoption of non-biological children to gay married couples can appear more unsettling than gay marriage itself! ”

This leads people to an understanding as to why the government may have limited their right to adoption.

Morality

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer persons are known to have existed for decades. It is because most countries have been accepting this community, and schools have been educating the students about the minor genders and sexualities, that most people have come to know of them. Nonetheless, it could still be seen that, even though countries have come up with the decision to accept LGBTQ, most citizens of that nation are not too willing to treat them the same as they would heterosexual persons. The discussion of Taiwan fundamentally clarifies the same. Raising the question of morality, if Taiwan’s decision was the right movement made, we could argue that on one hand yes, as it complies with the right of humanity and fulfillment of their essential needs. On the other hand, the matter of, if this step, fully eradicates the biases, and discriminatory ways of people in its society, and if it ensures communal standards of living, remains open. Considering Taiwan, it could be stated that despite the enactment of the law, according to Lu J. (2019), LGBTQ individuals may still face judgment in their daily lives. Most people are still afraid to come out, and this again states that this law hasn’t fully changed the minds of people, as minds are a structure that cannot be controlled by fellow beings. Also, this law doesn’t promise equality, as the LGBTQ community does not hold certain liberties that heterosexual people are endowed with, such as adoption rights. Alternatively taking into account all of these, it could be concluded that despite the ethics of the situation, Taiwan has exemplified how to stand up for the minorities of a country, and this big step is a major lead that probably gives the LGBTQ communities all over the world hope to one day achieve this in their own countries.

Essay on Interracial Adoption Debate

Many people think that one child will not change the world, however, the world can change that one child. No matter how the child ends up in a loving family, that child will forever be grateful for that opportunity. It can sometimes be problematic for a child who is growing up in a family where there are racial differences, however, a family who is determined to create an enriched living environment for their child will create a world of differences in the newly welcomed child. The idea of interracial adoption can seem less drastic when we as humans are capable of loving beyond one’s physical appearances. As a society, there should be a push to embrace humanity instead of being hung up on racial differences. As mentioned before, there are some challenges behind every story; therefore, subsequently, the pros, cons, pitfalls, and misunderstandings of what adopting an interracial child can bring to their upbringing will be discussed.

Interracial Adoption is a controversial topic that receives many critiques. An important allegation presented in the book African American Psychology (Belgrave & Allison, 2014) is based on the position taken on a paper published by the National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSA) by (R. Simon & Alstein, 1977) which places interracial adoption as a “cultural genocide” (p.202). According to the authors, a child should be placed in a home where they are going to share the same culture as their adoptive parents. If the contrary happens then, the child will experience “detrimental social and psychological well-being”. Later findings (Donaldson Report, May 2008) seem to correlate with the NABSA paper, since according to the author “even if white parents are well prepared, they will not be able to help African American Children develop the identity they need to live in a racist society”. The argument here will be, if you never experienced racism, how can you relate? The idea behind emerging into a different culture correlates with problems in racial or ethnic identity during adolescence.

When parents are looking to adopt a child the adoption facility looks at their records. They make sure that they can provide for the child and themselves. They also make sure they do not come from a bad background. They also make sure the parents will love the child as if it were their own and always show the child, they love them. They will make sure the child knows that the adoptive parents love them. When children are old enough to know that they are adopted they see themselves as multicultural. Most children will find out about their cultural and background differences, but they will still navigate around racial adoptions and their differences and still feel good and love themselves. The children should still be proud of who they are even if they are different. Parents see their family as normal families they do not care that their child is from a different country or parent. Parents have a shared message that they tell new parents who are adopting, that they know they are different, but they are still like their own child, and that they need to love them like their own child. Parents who adopt support each other in the process and know that they are there for each other and that there is nothing to fear.

There are millions of concerns with interracial adoptions, but the biggest concern is adopting the child and then bringing him/her back home with them and the child liking the home. The reason this is the biggest concern is it is very hard for a child to go from living in one country or town to a new one and adapt to it. It is very hard for children to make friends when they are new and if someone is mean to them, they do not want to try and make more friends. Many people who were asked in a study said that they did not think that adopting families could take the pressure and would fail. People who have adopted before have a more positive attitude toward life and adoption while on the other side people who have not adopted have a less positive attitude toward adoption. Many students who took a survey were open to the idea of interracial adoptions, but other students had different opinions. White students who took the survey were more open to the idea than students of different races. The other opinion was students who had an interracial family member or dated one supported the idea. The second opinion was people who did not date or have a family of interracial adoption did not support the idea that much. The number of children being put up for adoption is growing and it’s growing fast. The controversy should not matter it also should not matter the color or race of the adopting parent. If they can take care of themselves and the child, then they should be able to adopt. The children just want a loving family, to care and look out for them.

To sum up this topic, some might misunderstand things such as the idea of acting white or not acting black enough. All these cons, pitfalls, and misunderstandings seem to keep getting in the way of the one good pro for these kids and that has been their getting adopted. Race, gender, and age should never affect the outcome of a family wanting to adopt because you are choosing a life, so you shouldn’t choose one based on looks, but on the way you fall in love with the child.    

Pros and Cons of Adoption Essay

Adopting a dog can be one of the most exciting and rewarding experiences of your life. Not only do dogs provide companionship, but they also offer unwavering love and loyalty. However, at the same time, dogs are a lot of work and you should be prepared for a 10+ year commitment. If you’re not ready for all that, it’s probably best you wait on getting a canine friend.

On the other hand, if you’re ready to add a dog to your home, there are some things you should know about dog adoption before you get started.

Dog Adoptions

There are pros and cons to adopting a pet. While rescue animals make some of the best pets, it’s important to do plenty of research so you know exactly what you’re getting into. Let’s take a look at some pros and cons of adopting a pooch.

Pros

These are the reasons most people choose adoption:

    • You’re saving a life

While it sounds very cliché, it’s true! There are many dogs given up to shelters each year, and the sad truth is that they don’t all survive.

    • It’s cheaper to adopt a dog

Purebred puppies are expensive. And that’s only the beginning. The initial cost doesn’t include shots, food, toys, vet visits, etc. The cost of a rescue animal includes the animal, its shots, and the spay or neuter. It’s also helpful that the dog has already been seen by a veterinarian, so you’ll know if the dog already has health issues.

    • The dog may already be trained

Sure, there’s nothing cuter than a small, fluffy puppy. But, they are a lot of work and require true dedication. Many rescue dogs are older, so they go to their new homes already house-trained. Some of them may even know some cool tricks already.

    • Your rescue dog may be healthier and live longer

Many rescue dogs are mixed breeds. So, this eliminates the worry of some breed-specific diseases and illnesses. It may also mean that your dog can live a longer life because some breeds don’t live that long such as the Bernese Mountain Dog.

Cons

As with anything else, there can be some drawbacks to adopting a dog. Let’s take a look at the major ones:

    • It’s hard to find a puppy

Perhaps the biggest drawback of dog adoption is how hard it is to find a puppy. So, if you have your heart set on a young puppy, you’re better off looking into other options. If you are serious about adoption you can always add your name to waiting lists with smaller dog rescues, but there’s no limit on how long it may take for you to get the call.

    • You may end up with a large dog that’s not trained

Some dogs end up in shelters because their owners don’t have time to care for and train them. This means you may end up with a large dog that’s not trained. So, you may need an abundance of patience to train the dog not to jump on guests, to relieve themselves outside, etc.

    • The adoption process can be tedious

Many dog rescues have a list of questions they like to ask potential adopters and some of these questions tend to be personal. Some people decide the adoption process takes too long and makes you “jump through too many hoops”, and find a dog somewhere else.

Buying a Dog

While rescuing a dog is a rewarding experience, sometimes it is better to buy a dog. If you are looking for a specific breed and want to train the dog from a young age, then you should locate a reputable breeder and ask lots of questions to ensure the dog breed is right for you. Use caution when buying puppies from pet stores because many of them purchase their puppies from “puppy mills”. While these dogs need homes too, many of them will go to their new homes with health and behavior concerns.

In the end, regardless of where you plan to get your dog, just be sure you are ready! Dogs require a great deal of time, patience, and love, but the best part is you will get so much loyalty and comradery in return, that it is worth it! 

An Analytical Study Of Adoption In Islamic Religion

ABSTRACT

Adoption is a sense of act where a child is taken in and promised to be loved by the adopted parents. Adoption is complicated phenomenon followed by people right from the ancient times. Adoption rights varies according to the religious belief of a person. In this paper we will explain about adoption under Islam and its application under Muslim Law. Indian Muslim Law doesn’t permit adoption and only guardianship is allowed. In their culture it is considered to be a sin. This paper studies the restrictions and demands of adoption under Muslim law.

INTRODUCTION

Muslim in India have no general law for adoption. It is permitted for Hindus on the basis of their customs and usage. Adoption is considered to be a significant aspect of personal law in India. Muslims don’t possess adoption laws, but India being a country promoting equality, the Muslims can approach the court under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The Islamic Jurisprudence do not provide for adoption. The dominant drawback of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 is that, Muslim people may adopt a child under foster care only but as soon as the child completed his or her foster age, adoption wont exists anymore. For Hindus, the adoption is under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. In section 2 of the said act specifically provides that Hindus can’t adopt Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew child. As per Hinduism, adoption is given due recognition but adoption is not recognized by Muslims.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the research is that to study the concept of adoption practiced among Muslim and the laws related to foster care process under Guardian and Wards Act 1890. A overview about customary practice in Kashmir Valley and about the recent development about the concept.

RESEARCH MATERIAL

This paper was drafted using secondary articles, journals available in online and books for reference.

ADOPTION UNDER MUSLIM LAW

There is nothing like adoption in Muslim law. So, Muslim law does mot recognise adoption. In pre-Islamic Arabia, adoption was prevalent but prophet Muhammad was against it and so it was abrogated by a verse of the Quran.

The entire Mohammedan law of parentage is based on legitimacy so adoption must be out of place in it1. Adoption neither confers the status upon any person, the status of child nor any rights nor any rights of inheritance on the adopted child2. But the institution of adoption may prevail in the following circumstances:

  1. By Custom: If there is some custom prevailing among some Muhammedan communities, then that may be the force of law. Among some Hindu converts to Islam, the custom of adoption still prevails3. But the burden of proof that such custom is prevailing is on the person who asserts.4 But after the coming into force of the Shariat Act, 1937, such custom seems ro be abrogated because custom will prevail over the provisions of Muslim law except to the extent to which they have been abrogated by section 3(1) of this Act and if a declaration is made as required by it, the custom shall stand abrogated.5
  2. By law: If some provisions of any Act permit adoption, then it may have the force of law. Section 29 of the Oudh Estates Act, 1869 permits a Mohammedan talukar to adopt a son.6 The law has not been superseded by the Shariat Act, 1937.

In Maulvi Mohammad v. S. Mohboob Begum,7 the Madras High Court has held that if in fact the custom of adoption is prevailing it can be pleaded and proved. If such custom or usage is proved, there is no need of any declaration as to be made under section 3(1) of the Shariat Act, 1937 by any one concerned so as to rule out the existence of custom of adoption. This means to suggest that the formal declaration by the parties concerned is not necessary and that id such custom or usage is prevailing and gas been proved, it would be seemed that the parties have implied accepted the application of that custom.

But where the Shariat Act is not application, a Muslim may adopt under te customary law, if it prevails. For example, in Jammu and Kashmir where te Shariat Act is not applicable, adoption by Muslim under the customary law is valid.

CONCEPT OF ADOPTION IN QURAN

The custom of adoption was prevalent in Pre-Islamic Arabia based on a sense of Comrade-Ship in arms in some instances. The system of adoption seems to have received some recognition by the adoption of Zaid. Even the prophet Mohammad himself took Zaid, the son of Haris in adoption.8 But Prophet himself disapproves adoption. The relevant verse of Quran contained in section33, A, A 4-6 reads as under:

“Allah has not made for any man two hearts in his breast nor has he made your wives whom ye divorce by Zihar your mothers nor has he made your adopted sons your sons, such is your (manner of) speech by your mouths. But Allah tells (you) the truth and he shows the (right) way call them by after their fathers: that is just in the sight of Allah but if ye know not heir father’s names (then they are) your brother’s in faith, or your friend’s but there is no blame on you if ye make a mistake there in: (what counts is ) the intention of your hearts: and Allah is forgiving, most merciful. The prophet is closer to the Believers than their own selves and his wives are their mother’s blood relations among each other have closer personalities, in Book of Allah than (the Brotherhood of) believers and Muhajirs.8

From the above passage of the Quran, if has been asserted that adoption in technical sense is not allowed in Muslim law. It is submitted that in it were prohibits adoption, the intention of the Prophet was that if a man called another’s son “his son” it might create complication with natural and normal relationship if taken too literally. The idea of the Prophet was to convey that the real son is a real son and adoption son is not a real son. If the above verse of is interpreted to mean tat the prophet has prohibited adoption it can nit be assumed tat wat is prohibited by the Holy Quran can be permissible by custom and usage. The conclusion therefore, a that the Holy Quran nowhere prohibits adoption.

In Mst Fahmeeda v. Mst Zareefa10 where the party alleges custom of adoption of daughter which has not received any recognition, court held that burden of proof of its validity is on the petitioner. Thus, there is an overwhelming number of decisions that Muslim Law recognizes adoption by custom.

CUSTOMARY ADOPTION

It appears that in the Kashmir Valley, some Muslim families, many be due to the proximity of the Hindu Population, seem to adopt children, especially if they do not have their own natural born Children, A case to this effect has been reported as Yaqoob Laway v. Gulla.11 The Shariat Act of 1937, extends to the whole India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir, nevertheless adoption amongst Muslims in the Kashmir Valley seems to be in vogue as is indicated by the term, Pisarparwarshah (which literally means, adopted son).

Tis could be only as a matter of custom, and nor by way of any established Principle recognized under the Islamic law. This is evident from the fact that the adopted Child of Muslims does not figure among his heirs specially mentioned in the Holy Quran. This implies that customarily adopted son not become an heir to the heritable property of his adopted father.

RECENT DEVELOPMENT

In the present case, Shabnam Hashmi v. Union of India,12 the three main issues have brought before the supreme court. These were the following:

  1. Recognition of the right to adopt and to be adopted as a fundamental right under Part III of the constitution.
  2. Optional guidelines enabling adoption of children by persons irrespective of religion, caste, creed, etc.
  3. Direction to the Government of India to enact an option law the prime focus of which is the child with consideration like religion etc., taking a hind seat

It may be noted here that before this judgement, in Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union od India,13 the Supreme Court of India is a high watermark in the development of the law relating to adoption. Dealing with inter-country adoptions, elaborate guidelines as been laid by this court to protect and further the interest of the child. A regulatory body, i.e., Central Adoption Resource Agency was recommended for creation and according set up by the Government of India in the year 1989. Since then, the said body has been playing a pivotal role, laying sown norms both substantive and procedural, in the matter of inter as well as in country adoptions. The said norms have received statutory recognition on being notified by the Central Government under rule 33(2) of the Juvenile justice Rules, 2007 and are today in force throughout the country, having also been adopted and notified by several States under the Rules framed by the States in exercise of the Rule-making power under section 68 of the JJ Act, 2000.

In the case of Shabnam Hashmi case, the Supreme Court has stated that prospective parents have option to employ the provisions of section 41 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 to adopt a child or they can also choose not to do so and submit themselves to their applicable Personal Laws.

However, Personal Laws cannot dictate the operation of provisions of an enabling statute like Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 and cannot come in the way of person who chooses to adopt a child under Juvenile Justice Act, 2000. Juvenile justice is a secular law and small steps in reaching the goal of Uniform civil Code under article 44 of constitution of India. Juvenile Justice overrides Personal Law when resorted to by any person. So, Adoption by Muslim permitted vide Juvenile Justice Act, 2000.

Ultimately Supreme Court held that Muslims can adopt a child with full rights as natural parents under provisions section 41 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000.

RULES FOR ADOPTION IN MUSLIM LAW:

The rules of adoption under Muslim Law are as under:

  1. The adoptive parents are not allowed to hide the identity of the Child’s biological family.
  2. The tie of the child with his biological parents is never severed.
  3. Adoptive parents are not the biological parents of the adoptive child.
  4. In Islam adoption means ‘Kafala’. It means ‘to freed’. In other word the foster – parent relationship.
  5. The adoptive parents are not allowed to change or alter the name and surname of the adoptive child.
  6. Adoptive child inherits from his biological parents and not from his adoptive parents.
  7. As soon as the adoptive child becomes grown up the adoptive family ceases to be his blood relatives.
  8. Adoptive parents are not allowed interfere with the property of the child given for adoption. They are merely the trustee of such property

CONCLUSION

From the above information it is conclude that India is a secular country practicing utmost equality amongst its citizen. Right to adopt a child, right to parenthood in case who are not able to become parents naturally have no other recourse rather than adoption. Thus, adoption in its purest form is universal as well as basic fundamental right which cannot be denied to anyone. It is a well settled universal principle that when there is a conflict or ambiguity between the personal law and the universal fundamental rights then the universal fundamental rights shall exist. Thus, the Supreme Court of India is right in its decision in granting adoption rights to all. The ultimate spirit of the constitution lies in equality to all rather than fragmentation under the name of personal law

Why to Adopt from a Shelter Rather Than a Pet Store

Puppy mills are defined as commercial breeding facilities that mass-produce dogs for sale through pet stores, or directly to consumers through classified ads or the Internet. In simple terms, these businesses known as puppy mills put their profit, or the amount of money pulled in through sales, above the care required for these dogs. Mills ship their canines to pet stores or sell them on the Internet for common consumers to buy and take home. Buying puppies from pet stores rather than shelters can lead to many consequences, including behavioral problems, disease, a shorter life span, and price differences; on the other hand, shelter adoptions provide a sense of security and trust in your adoption.

The condition of these facilities is a frequently addressed topic. Puppy mills often confine their pups in metal cages, commonly piled atop one another, with little to no protection from the elements. These could include drastically cold or hot temperatures, stormy weather, or extreme winds. The puppy’s food and drink are often restricted or replaced with unhealthy equivalents, leading to famished or thirsty pups. Even worse, little puppies are often forced to sit for long periods of time in their own waste since there is little attention received from workers. Because freedom from the crates is uncommon, the small dogs miss out on practice opportunities for necessary social skills.

But where do these puppies come from? The answer is breeding dogs. Breeding dogs, commonly female, are forced to give birth to mass amounts of pups in short periods of time. Breeding is repeated until the initial breeding dog loses the ability to pass off more puppies. This cycle not only affects the original birthing dog, but also her litters. When immense stress is placed on a pregnant dog, the stress has the capability of affecting the kin, just like humans, and may result in a premature birth or aloof puppies.

When she is finished breeding, it is not uncommon for workers to ‘euthanize’ her and replace her with a new dog, only for the process to begin all over again. Euthanasia is the humanly-inflicted death of a person or animal, usually occurring when one is on his or her deathbed and the option is often selected by inflictors as ‘the only solution’. That is not the case in this situation, and euthanasia can be committed through cruel and painful methods, such as drownings and shootings.

Veterinary care is also limited in the mills. Since dogs in these facilities are ultimately bred for a profit, genuine care and love take a backseat role. Proper veterinary care costs money, and paying for individual check-ups can add up. Mill owners often take the cheap route and lend this job to unqualified workers, often performing operations without anesthesia. Veterinary care is important. Without qualified care, issues with hygiene, infection, and illnesses are more likely to occur, especially since the dogs are stuck in such close, contagious quarters.

Alongside the veterinary and psychological disorders, rapid breeding also can affect the relationship of the pups and their mother. Attachment and basic social skills are important for any being to thrive, and this attachment can be ripped away from these dogs. Since puppies are so frequently churned out for a quick buck, there is barely any time for the dogs to familiarize themselves with their mother and littermates. This can reflect onto the setting of a family pet bought from a pet store. Since the basic social skills and attachment were not present at a young age for these puppies, the same can be true of their relationship with humans. Pet store pups may have issues with attachment, aggression, anxiety and fear. Social situations are necessary for dogs to thrive.

Pet stores receive dogs from puppy mills, but where are these facilities? The Midwest has the greatest concentration of mills in the US, with Missouri leading the region. Puppy mill pups begin their lives in mills all across the United States. Amish and Mennonite communities also commonly sell puppies, especially in Indiana and Ohio. Puppies are transported to pet stores or sold on the Internet by trucks or planes. The form of transport can also affect the growing puppies. Close quarters can result in anxiety, fear, stress, or illness.

Another form of breeding dogs for a profit is probably the most innocent: backyard breeders. Backyard breeders are sellers who breed their own dogs, often household pets, from the home. These can include neighbors, friends, and even family members. Although his or her intentions may be pure, these breeders are still breeding dogs for an ultimate cash reward and may not have access to safe breeding equipment or know the proper safety procedures necessary to conduct this activity. Animals could die early or may develop genetic defects or disease due to a lack of proper hygiene. An early death or lethal illness can certainly hurt the adopter, who was only interested in a simple family pet.

There are many methods to tell the difference between a puppy mill sponsored facility and a legitimate breeder or shelter. One obvious giveaway of a puppy mill or suspicious activity is the unwillingness of a worker to show off the whole facility. Before an adopter enters the premises, he or she should be sure to ask to see the entire breeding space. If the worker denies entry, he or she is more likely to be serving a puppy mill operation. Interested customers should also request information about the license of the breeding facility and make sure the corporation is of proper legal standing. Puppy mills can be licensed or unlicensed, but are required to be licensed in order to sell to a pet shop.

One should also be aware of pet stores and the likeliness that these businesses are supported by puppy mills. It is important for families interested in a new pet to look closely into background information on their breeder, especially if the seller is a backyard breeder. Location is also a sign of a proper or improper breeding facility. Ask sellers about their breeding intentions and background information.

Other issues are common among purebreds, or dogs carefully bred with fellow members of the same pure breed to produce a selected result. Purebreds are often highly sought after by dog competitors and people interested in a specific breed. Along with being popular, purebreds are costly and are sometimes a result of inbreeding because of the decreasing amount of actual ‘purebreds’. Purebreds are estimated to have a higher chance of developing genetic issues in contrast with mixed breeds. Genetic issues can include but are not limited to hip dysplasia, an enlarged heart, or issues with the respiratory system. These issues arise when closely related dogs are bred together, either forming genetic disorders or continuously passing them down the genetic line.

The pair selected for breeding can produce a life-altering effect on their pups. One significant example is the difference in life spans between dogs from shelters versus purebreds. Shelter dogs commonly have a longer lifespan than dogs from puppy mills. This is because of genetic defects in purebreds. In some cases, immunity to some diseases can be built up in mixed breeds because the distance in relation allows for the collection of different traits.

Although many of these puppy mill issues may seem temporary or insignificant, there are issues that can significantly alter one’s relationship and time with their new pup. The death of a beloved family pet upsets everyone, so why hasten it? Puppy mill dogs are at a much higher risk of shorter lifespans than mixed breeds. The partner of the original breeding dog is of a different breed or unrelated to the original, so the resulting puppy is less likely to receive possibly harmful disorders. Overall, mixed breeds offer a much longer life expectancy for the price an adopter pays.

Behavior issues are also much more common among puppy mill dogs because of the situation they are born into. Along with affecting the dog’s experiences with other animals, behavior problems can shift relationships between humans and pets. The dog may be afraid of humans, so growling, barking, or other forms of aggression may occur when in contact with young children or excitable people. Opposition may argue that behavior issues can be trained away, and this may be true in some dogs; however, this is not the case for every puppy mill pup. Dogs from puppy mills are automatically at a higher risk of developing these tendencies and sticking to them throughout their lives solely because of their background.

Another sharp contrast between adopting a pet from a pet store versus a shelter is support. Dogs adopted from shelters come from an environment with volunteers that are not interested in serving animals’ needs for the profit. Workers genuinely care about the animals’ safety, needs, and personality. They want these dogs to move to a loving and stable home and will be more likely to look further into future owners’ backgrounds. This is not to discount pet shop employees who may also care about animals, but it is apparent that shelter volunteers have done their research on the benefits of shelter adoptions and are not striving for a profit.

Support services targeted for home life with a new dog at pet stores are often somewhat limited as well. There is a need to make more room for a greater profit, and often pet stores are not interested in keeping up with their dogs after the business process is over. Pet stores are not charity; they are businesses.

The business aspect of pet stores is easy to see when one compares the prices of the two pets. According to Frances Battista, “Buying a pet can easily cost $500 to $1,000 or more. Adoption costs range from $50 to $200, depending on whether the pet comes from the city shelter or a rescue group that has spent money on boarding, vets and grooming”. Animals from shelters are unlikely to be purebreds, which automatically lowers the price. At some shelters, microchipping, injections, neutering, and spaying are included in the initial adoption cost, making this price even more tempting. Older dogs from shelters can even be housebroken compared to little puppies from pet shops. The price of housebreaking a dog can be very expensive, from the proper clean-up equipment to the possibility of additional obedience training. Plus, one will be less likely to have to buy a new carpet or invest in a cleaner.

Adopting from a shelter also saves another dog besides the adoptee. According to the Humane Society of the United States, one can rescue a dog “and open shelter space for another animal who might desperately need it”. Over one million dogs are estimated to be euthanized in shelters every year. Why not send one of those dogs to a loving home? As mentioned above, shelters are often filled to the brim with animals. This allows a broad selection of breeds and hounds to choose from. There is likely a shelter dog for everyone.

Some may argue that one is still saving a life by buying a pet, but this is not truly the case. Although the individual dog may be adopted, money is still being passed on to the cruel owners of puppy mills to continue this abusive practice. Others may say that a shelter dog is in its situation because of its behavior or a defect, but this is also rarely the case. According to the Humane Society of the United States, “Most shelter pets wound up there because of a human problem like a move or a divorce, not because the animals did anything wrong”.

Adopting from a shelter can literally save a life and open up a slot for a new furry friend. There are about ten thousand puppy mills in the country, with more than two million dogs reproduced in mills annually. It is not uncommon for these animals to eventually drift to shelters, only increasing the capacity of the already-overpopulated facilities. Adopting from a shelter is the best way to work against puppy mills. There is no way for any money spent to travel back to mills through this method.

Buying puppies from pet stores rather than shelters can lead to many consequences, including behavioral problems, disease, a shorter life span, and significantly high prices. Shelter adoptions serve the cause against puppy mills and the abuse of puppies and breeding dogs. Adopting also opens up more shelter space for future rescues and allows for adopters to literally save a life. A broad selection of animals is available, allowing future families to find the perfect pooch. Adopting from a shelter offers a clear conscience and support for interested adopters.

Why Adopt a Rescue Dog? Essay

As we know, people often wonder what makes a better decision to rescue and adopt a dog from a shelter or purchase a puppy from a pet store? While both animals can give unconditional love, adopters have to consider that a puppy from a pet store come from puppy mills and that are usually using inhumane breeding operations to only make a profit out it versus rescuing a dog or a puppy that is waiting for love at a shelter to find the perfect home. There are several rescue groups to help with the adoption process and to learn the financial responsibility care and well-being of the animal as well as non-profit, no-kill shelters. All rescue groups want is to connect people and pets, and shelters can help find a match with different household conditions and expectations. This essay will explain why rescuing a dog is a humane way to do instead of purchasing a puppy, think of those dogs that their life also has value even though it is unknown where the dogs came from and deserve a home too.

Adopting a rescue dog that someone else has given up will save a life, it will cost less and will help fight puppy mills. The American Miniature Schnauzer Club Rescue it is an organization with low fees that takes dogs from breeders, and that could not sell them. Beth Santure states “99.9 percent of the dogs we take in are either dogs purchased at pet stores or breeding stock” (Santure, 2006, p.71). Knowing the fee is an essential element when a dog is adopted, the fee includes first vaccinations, microchip, and neuter. Even though the fee is low, people have to learn and understand that it is a big responsibility that the adorable puppy may stay with the family for many years. “An important factor is if you are financially stable enough to bring home a pet” (Barley, 2014, p.49) because even though the cost is low, adopters need to understand the financial responsibility that becomes taking care of the dog. Therefore, research the relation of the cost and go to a local shelter or association to get the details and get connected with someone with experience.

Another essential reason to get a rescue dog is to understand that it is okay to ask for help. Shelters and societies dedicated to rescuing dogs are to help with the process of the adoption “through a local rescue organization that will give pointers and support” (Barley, 2014, p.50). People who work at the shelters will be a great resource to help find information or resources for the pet. The staff members work with animals every day and have a wealth of information on many different issues. As a consequence, when adopting a dog from an animal shelter in the community, supports a non-profit organization the cost of the adoption goes towards helping the shelter give better care for animals being taken care of, and also sends a message to others to rescue instead of buying.

The humane, ethical choice for people should be adopting from a shelter to give a dog a second opportunity in life. It does not have to matter the background of a dog’s past life. Adopting a rescue dog is the best thing to do is to continue fighting puppy mills and dogs purchased at pet stores. To support local organizations, that offer professional help in the adoption process. Change the life of a dog, think about all the time the dog spent its whole life in a shelter and never knowing what is to have a family and it will also change the life of the adopter.

References

  1. Barley, L. (2014, 12). Rescue Me. Vegetarian Times, , 48-51. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1630056298?accountid=144845
  2. Santure, B. (2006, 02). TERRIER GROUP: Miniature schnauzers. AKC Gazette, 123, 71. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/195992362?accountid=144845

Why You Should Adopt Rather Than Buy a Pet: Persuasive Speech

Did you know that only 1 out of every 10 dogs born will find a permanent home? Animals all over the world are suffering without homes and without loving owners. Adopting your pets is the better option than buying from a breeder for many reasons those reasons being, you support non-profit business such as shelters and humane societies, you can give the animals in a shelter a loving, warm home, and last but not least it is cheaper than buying from an overpriced breeder. There are many ways that you can adopt your pets, the simplest way being to go into a shelter or humane society visit all the cute little pets and if you are interested in an animal then you can adopt them and go home that day, unless you have another dog, then you would have to make a meeting for the two pups to meet. Another way to adopt would be through PetFinder.com, this website helps you find any animal within whatever vicinity that you would like online, it is sort of like a dating website to find your fur friend. However, there is many ways to adopt that is cheaper and easier overall, but there is more information that you should know about adopting.

There are many wonderful animals all over the world in shelters and humane societies all over the world. According to ASPCA.org, “Approximately 6.5 million companion animals enter United States animals shelters nationwide every year. Of those, 3.3 million are dogs and 3.2 million are cats”. This number has annually declined from 7.2 million in 2011, the biggest decline overall was in dogs (3.9 to 3.3 million). Out of those 6.5 million, 3.2 million of those shelter animals are adopted each year half of those being dogs and the other half being cats.

The local human society has many elder dogs and cats, the kittens and puppies are very popular overall. Now, of course there are also many stray animals as well and there is not any exact number when it comes to these animals in the United States, but the number estimates to 70 million. Unfortunately, many of those strays are lost pets that were not kept properly indoors or did not have correct identification. There is something out there for anyone. The Humane Society records show 3,500 smaller animal shelters in the US and over 10,000 rescue groups and animal sanctuaries in North America overall. In Northwest Ohio alone there are 20 shelters. Overall, there is no reason that one should not consider adoption when they are looking to expand their family.

There are many different places that one could adopt/rescue all throughout the United States. There are shelters for exclusively cats and kittens, shelters full of puppies and only puppies, also shelters with larger and older dogs as well. 3,500 smaller animal shelters are in the US and over 10,000 rescue groups and animal sanctuaries in North America overall. Many, many, many animals are in shelters and humane societies all over the world 6.5 million animals enter the US shelters every year. I believe that if more people started adopting and completely stopped buying/supporting breeders that the number of animals going into shelters could go down drastically. If you are looking to add a furry friend to your family start searching online for local shelters and give those pups and cats a visit first.

Autobiography Essay about Adopted Girl

Built on the basis of relationships and work ethics, The Spirit of Want by William H. Coles is an amazing fictional tale that spun for more than a decade. The novel is organized into forty-two chapters which feature Lucy as the main protagonist. Lucy is an orphaned girl adopted by Doctor Abner J.(A.J.) She is informed that her mother died at her tender age in Puerto Rico. The novel begins with a party to celebrate Abner’s research clinic that was established through fundraising from friends and colleagues. He has invited Luke to the party because he wants him to be on the board of directors of the research clinic. Luke attempts to create rapport with Lucy and Elizabeth but is rather put off by Lucy’s attitude towards him. On his way out, A.J. requests him to ride in Lucy’s car back home so as to keep an eye on her.

This journey back home turned out to shed more light on Lucy’s character. She stubbornly insists that she is not drunk yet severally veers off the road. Luke realizes that she is in love with this beautiful and intelligent woman. A.J. has a carefully guarded secret that is set to affect Elizabeth’s decision especially when Lucy needs a kidney transplant. Despite all the evil he has done to her, Lucy finds it impossible to hate Hower Bain. She would rather be disbarred than lose Bain. Will she regret her decision to elope with Bain? Why does Lucy want to abort her pregnancy?

Narrated from a third person’s perspective, the novel extensively employed the use of vivid descriptions of characters and events. This technique enabled Coles to advance his plot and enhance the reader’s contact with the characters. Coupled with flashbacks, the stylistics gave the novel an all-rounded approach in addressing most of its thematic concerns including excessive alcohol consumption, malpractice at work, the institution of marriage, defilement, hypocrisy of ministers, and sexual immorality among others.

I loved the fact that Coles opted for an adopted girl of color as his protagonist. This enabled him to tackle on a wider scale the ills of racism even in family setups. Coles also challenged the social stereotypes against women as far as their career choices and professional input is concerned. However, I think Coles gave up on this course when he quickly allowed the jury to rule against Bain and then went ahead to grant Bain victory in the appeal. The fact that Lucy also neutralized the key witness to vehicular manslaughter that she was involved in also made me question Coles’ stand on justice and manipulation. A.J.’s insults to Agnes and Elizabeth about how stupid and ignorant they were also led me to conclude that that book still hailed male chauvinism and overtly condoned it.

I noticed with concern the lack of inconsistency in the orthography of Lucy’s name. Initially, her name was spelled as ‘Lucy’ but as the novel progressed, the spelling shifted to ‘Luce’. I also found some grammatical errors in the book and I believe this is enough reason for me to rate the book three out of four stars. With another round of editing, the book will be sure to earn better ratings. I would recommend this text to lovers of fiction and love drama. However, traditional Christians may be offended by the level of outright infidelity exhibited by some characters.