Category: 4th of July

Introduction to Douglass’s Rhetorical Strategy

Douglass uses the second person pronouns with words including “you” and “your” instead of the first person plural “we” and “us” because Douglass is primarily delivering this speech to his “fellow citizens” which not only includes his fellow slaves but also some of the Americans and figures responsible for writing the Declaration of Independence. By doing this, Douglass is able to emphasize that while many of the whites and Americans who fought for independence from Britain celebrate the Fourth of July as an important holiday where the American population recognizes their freedom, many African slaves don’t have the same rights and freedoms that the whites have which makes this holiday not as worth celebrating for the slave population. This is evident in the second paragraph where Douglass mentions that “This Fourth July is your, not mine” (line 14-15) and in the third paragraph where he mentions that the nation “never looked blacker to me than on this 4th of July” (line 28-29). In addition, by using second person pronouns, Douglass is able to put his audience into his story of many of the issues regarding slavery and the Declaration of Independence not giving rights to slaves like him. On the other hand, Douglass refrains from using first person plural words such as “we” and “us” because by doing that, he would be significantly limiting the amount of influence and experience he shares as they would mostly pertain to himself rather than to the rest of the audience which is more achievable with second person pronouns. However, at the same time, by effectively handling his usage of second person pronouns, Douglass is able to get the audience engaged in his speech and putting them in his story and message.

Contrasting Perspectives: Slaves vs. Free Americans

Douglass’s style embodies or expresses “the immeasurable distance between us” especially in the second paragraph (line 7-18) because he emphasizes how some of the slaves as well as the American people view Independence Day in almost opposite ways. After he mentions “the immeasurable distance between us” this allows him to continue mentioning how slavery has taken a toll on the audience which primarily includes lots of slaves and points out the irony of the Declaration of Independence giving the people freedom and liberties compared to the slaves who have close to none of those things. This is evident in paragraph 6 where Douglass questions about the “wrongfulness of slavery” (line 48) as well as the “submission to their masters” (line 53) and in paragraph 8 where he continues to ask what the 4th of July is to the other slaves and explains his answer of it revealing the “gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim” (line 61-62). In addition, Douglass’s style which primarily includes loads of references to the lives of slaves expected after the Declaration of Independence and what it actually is like and expresses lots of his criticisms of this ideology being inconsistent with slavery which allows him to further share his view and persuade his “fellow citizens” to engage with his speech.

While Douglass doesn’t directly model his speech after the Declaration, he includes lots of elements and references to it as well as many premises of human rights and the way the government should act. For example, after he questions whether the “principles of political freedom and of natural justice” (line 3-4) extended to the slaves in paragraph 1, in the following paragraph, Douglass notes how the “rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity and independence” (line 12-13) is not shared onto himself. In addition, Douglass continues to argue that despite the Declarations sayings that “man is entitled to liberty” (line 47) that shouldn’t be taken away by the government, there are still many instances of slaves being treated poorly such as by “[robbing] them of their liberty and to work without wages” (line 49-50). After mentioning many references to the Declaration of Independence to support his point, Douglass finishes by mention how he drew lots of encouragement from the Declaration of Independence and the “great principles it contains” (line 146) including human rights and the proper role of the government mentioned earlier.

Douglass’s Grievances: Advocacy for Justice and Equality

Douglass includes many grievances in his entire speech to advocate for blacks to have justice and rights that the other whites have. For example, in paragraph 6, Douglass establishes that “God did not establish it [slavery]” (line 56) and concludes that there is “blasphemy in the thought” (line 57) and is therefore something that is unfair to his people. In addition, Douglass demonstrates in paragraph 9 that the church “does not esteem the Fugitive Slave Law” (line 101-102) which ultimately implies that the church views religions “simply as a form of worship” (line 104) which can be conducted by persons who “refuse to give shelter to the houseless” (line 107-108). Furthermore, Douglass in paragraph 13 ultimately reveals the “dark picture” (line 140) of America with its treatment on slaves that completely goes against the Declaration of Independence and argues that they must “work the downfall of slavery” (line 142). By including these grievances, Douglass points out just how flawed most of America and its treatment on people are especially slaves and argues that in order for the Declaration to truly be a turning point and something that is actually genuine and doesn’t do something against its saying, it must give equal rights and fair treatments to the slaves as well.

Douglass ultimately comes to a conclusion about expanding liberty onto the slaves mainly in paragraph 12-14 after he mentions all of the irony and issues about slaves and their rights and freedoms and what the Declaration of Independence was supposed to do. In paragraph 12, Douglass explains that in order to have such men be supported, the people must begin by supporting the efforts of “the great mission of the slave’s redemption from his chains” (line 138). Once that is taken care of, not only will more slaves be arguing for the rights and liberties of blacks but some other whites who support giving out rights will also support the cause of expanding liberties given from the Declaration to them. Douglass continues to mention in paragraph 13 and 14 that there are people who will “work the downfall of slavery” (line 142) and that the “doom of slavery is certain” (line 144) which expresses much of his confidence that his conclusions and his motivations will ultimately be successful in allowing liberty to be expanded among the slaves.

Some implicit conclusions that Douglass comes to that aren’t as direct as some other conclusions is that the church is also significantly involved in the result of slaves having less liberties than the average white citizen. For instance, in paragraph 11, Douglass believes that the church is “not only indifferent to the wrongs of the slaves” (line 113) but that it also “sides with the oppressors” (line 114) which has resulted in the increased amount of practice of slavery and harsher treatments of the slaves overall. Likewise, Douglass continues to mention that the church has taught people that blacks could “be a slave” (line 117) and that this relation is “ordained of God” (line 118) to reveal that not only is the Church siding with the whites on this issue but it is also acting like slaveholders as they are treating them just as harsh. Because of this, Douglass implies that the current situation of many slaves is not necessarily just because of the government but also because of the Church.

Religious Rhetoric: The Church’s Role in Slavery

By using religious language and allusions to scriptures, the rhetorical effect of using this discourse is that he is able to establish that he knows quite a lot about the religious situation going on especially with the Church supporting the use and treatments of slaves. For instance, in paragraph 11, Douglass mentions some of the church activities including that a worship “conducted by a person who refuses to give shelter” (line 107) or do other nice deeds is a curse rather than a blessing. With this religious language, Douglass is able to appeal to the “fellow citizens” about the impact of religions on them as well as how these religious leader may not be as great as originally viewed as they can often do stuff that goes against the Declaration. In addition, Douglass continues discussing in paragraph 11 that the Bible describes everyone who doesn’t do good to others as “hypocrites” (line 110) who have “omitted the weightier matters of the law” (line 111). By making such an allusion to scripture, Douglass emphasizes that even though both the Declaration and the Bible state that people including slaves must be treated with care, this rarely happens in America which he believes must happen.

Personal Experiences: Strengthening Credibility and Emotional Appeal

By referring to his own experiences in his speech, Douglass is able to provide and strengthen his credibility because by mentioning that he had experienced much of these events himself, Douglass shows that many of the things he discusses are indeed factual and not something that was easily made up out of thin air. For example, in paragraph 3, Douglass mentions how, with all his emphasis, believes that he dares to denounces “everything that serves to perpetuate slavery” (line 35-36). Douglass continues by explaining that the relationship between the slaves and the slaveowners is anything but a good one as the slaveowners often “beat them with sticks” (line 50-51) and “starve them into obedience” (line 53) which are only a few of the very harsh treatments. This experience from Douglass is able to strengthen his credibility significantly as a personal experience with a certain event better allows for a deeper evaluation of the event and put more trust on him overall. Without the personal experience, Douglass wouldn’t be as likely to be credible as he could easily be making up “facts” and describing things he didn’t actually experience firsthand.

These experiences that Douglass shares also provides logical support for his claims because it shows just how ironic it is that slaves still don’t have as much liberties despite the Declaration recognizing these freedoms for everyone else. For example, in paragraph 7, Douglass answers that the 4th of July is a reveal of reality and expresses the “cruelty to which he [the slaves] are the constant victim” (line 61-62). Douglass continues in paragraph 8 by mentioning that by the acts of the American Congress, slavery officially became “nationalized in its most horrible and revolting form” (line 71-72). This experience from Douglass is able to provide logical support because it shows the connection between the documents that established many rights and liberties and the continued existence of slavery that still occurred. Without the logical support between these events, there wouldn’t be much of a connection as these events could entirely be independent or used as a means to get people more involved in giving slaves more rights.

Douglass’s experiences also appeal to the emotion because they emphasize many of the harsh treatments that the slaves were forced to endure and shows that the treatments of slaves as well as their lack of liberties wasn’t something to be ignored and had to be considered and acted as soon as possible. For example, Douglass explains in paragraph 5 that the relationship between the slaves and the slaveowners is anything but a good one as the slaveowners often “beat them with sticks” (line 50-51) and “starve them into obedience” (line 53) which are only a few of the very harsh treatments. In addition, Douglass mentions more of the life of slaves including that they have been “hunted down” (line 84) and “consigned to slavery and excruciating torture” (line 84-85). This experience allows Douglass to depict just how difficult life is for the slaves and that their treatment is harsh to the point where it begins to hurt them really bad unlike the slaveowners who don’t have as much treatment. Without the appeal to emotion, the experience may not feel as interesting or worth listening to as the emotional appeal lets the “fellow citizens” know that the slaves have significantly been impacted by these policies and events.

Douglass in his ceremonial speech is praising the Declaration of Independence’s efforts to expand natural rights and liberties as well as the efforts to abolish slavery but is also blaming the government and church for not only not fully enforcing the rights to the slaves and siding against them but also significantly contributing in some of the slave activities. In paragraph 1, Douglass questions whether the Declaration of Independence extended the “principles of political freedom and of natural justice” (line 4-5) to the salves. Likewise, Douglass in paragraph 10, emphasizes how the church is “not a vital principle, requiring active benevolence, justice, love, and good will” (line 104-105) because it is behaving similar to the government in not fully extending the rights and liberties to the blacks. Douglass, with this evidence, and experience praises some of the efforts to help better the treatments of slaves but is blaming their lack of actually taking these events seriously as both the government and church do make some efforts to help the blacks but are also ultimately conforming to the slaveholders and whites rather than the Declaration of Independence and the rights listed there.

Douglass uses much of the present moment to make connections to the past and the future to help depict how the current situation of the slaves is as a direct result of what happened in the past and that the present will effect what will happen in the future which means that action must be taken quickly. For example, in paragraph 3, Douglass believes that if the present moment is bad, then it is very likely that the past was bad and “false” (line 31) but also expresses hope that the future can improve even though it is also as likely to be bad. However, Douglass also presents a response that he still has “hope” (line 145) because of the Declaration of the Independence and its intentions to the people. Douglass, with these events from the past, present, and future, recognizes that much of these events are directly related to one another and if things are kept the same then so will the future events which will very likely not allow for black to have the same liberties as whites.

The logical basis that Douglass shares provides support for his claims because it shows just how ironic it is that slaves still don’t have as much liberties despite the Declaration recognizing these freedoms for everyone else. For example, in paragraph 7, Douglass answers that the 4th of July is a reveal of reality and expresses the “cruelty to which he [the slaves] are the constant victim” (line 61-62). Douglass continues in paragraph 8 by mentioning that by the acts of the American Congress, slavery has become more serious as there is “neither law nor justice, humanity nor religion” (line 88) which has happened as the “Fugitive Slave Law makes mercy” to these actions (line 89-90). This experience from Douglass is able to provide logical support because it shows the connection between the documents that established many rights and liberties and the continued existence of slavery that still occurred. As a result, Douglass establishes a line of connection between the events above and realizes that what happens to one of these situations will significantly impact the other in a similar way.

Douglass is able to establish and strengthen his credibility because by mentioning that he had experienced much of these events himself, Douglass shows that many of the things he discusses are not fiction and something that he experienced firsthand. For example, in paragraph 3, Douglass begins talking about slavery and elaborates on many of the popular characteristics from a “slave’s point of view” (line 26) and believes that the “conduct of this nation never looked blacker” (line 28-29) than on the 4th of July. In addition, in paragraph 5, Douglass questions whether the audience should have him “argue that man is entitled to liberty” (line 47) and follows by saying that it has already been “declared” (line 48). This experience from Douglass is able to strengthen his credibility significantly as a personal experience with a certain event better allows for a deeper evaluation of the event and put more trust on him overall. Because of this, Douglass is able to establish himself as a prominent slave figure who had experienced many of the pain that a slave had to endure which makes him more credible overall.

Conclusion: A Call for Immediate Action

Douglass’s uses emotion because he emphasizes many of the harsh treatments that the slaves were forced to endure and shows that the treatments of slaves as well as their lack of liberties wasn’t something to be ignored and had to be considered and acted as soon as possible. For example, Douglass explains in paragraph 5 that the relationship between the slaves and the slaveowners is a very bad one at best as the slaveowners often “keep them ignorant of their relations” (line 50) and “load their limbs with iron” (line 51) and “knock out their teeth” (line 52) which are only a few of the very harsh treatments. In addition, Douglass mentions more of the life of slaves including that they have been “hunted down” (line 84) and “consigned to slavery and excruciating torture” (line 84-85). By using emotions, Douglass emphasizes how many of the slaves including himself felt about the treatments upon them which ultimately allows for some of the audience to feel the same emotion. As a result, the emotions are more likely able to cause some of these people to listen to the situation and express some sympathy.

Fredick Douglass, born into slavery in 1818, in Talbot County, Maryland. Douglass is in fact known for giving an astounding speech. In 1852, Douglas was invited to give a speech at Independence Day celebration. His speech, ‘What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?’ was delivered at an event commemorating the signing of the Declaration of Independence, held at Corinthian Hall in Rochester, New York. There were around 500 people in attendance that paid twelve cents to listen. He was there to speak about what the fourth of July means for us black people. The speech first starts out with douglass praising the founding fathers of this country and their ideas of how perfect they planned on the Republic to look. He understood that the Declaration of Independence wasn’t for all citizens. His speech later develops into the viewpoint of the White Americans towars slavery. Throughout his famous speech there way many uncomfortable points made towards his white audience.

“This, for the purpose of this celebration is the 4th of July. It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom”. This is one way in which Frederick Douglass stresses the different historical significance of the 4th of July for whites and blacks is by repeatedly using the word ‘your’ when explaining the exclusion of blacks from American history. This speech alone contains the word ‘your’ over 100 times. Douglass substitute the “The” in The Declaration of Independence, to “That” Declaration of Independence. He uses this to express our separation from theirs. He was making his point on how “That” Declaration of Independence was not for us. This here alone would make the white audendience feel like they were doing something unconsciously wrong.

“This, to you, is what the Passover was to the emancipated people of God”. The religious analogy–comparing the emancipation of the Jews from Egypt to the independence of the American nation from England–makes of American nationalism a civic religion, with the founding fathers as high priests and the founding documents as sacred texts.

“I am glad, fellow-citizens, that your nation is so young”. Once again Douglass shows the disparity between living as an enslaved Negro in the United States and living as a free Caucasian. Although they are “Fellow citizens”. He still refers to the country as yours. Implying that while they might all live in the same independent country, it only truly belonged to the white ruling class.

Throughout American history, there have been many incidents of oppression regarding the people of the United States especially African Americans. Frederick Douglass’ speech ‘What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?’ shows that The Declaration of Independence is not only historically important, but it also has faults. Both documents briefly discuss the British crown and freedom in both cases. But there are some similarities along with differences to look at within the two documents. Including more oppression and considering if the Fourth of July should be celebrated by African Americans throughout the United States of America. Alongside these two documents, there will be information on an FBI Program called Counterintelligence (COINTELPRO). These historical documents had an impact back then and even into today’s time, but the views of both Frederick Douglass’s speech and The Declaration of Independence hold very high importance. Using both of these documents it will show the similarities and differences between the two along with non- white’s views on the Fourth of July.

Frederick Douglass opens his speech by introducing the Fourth of July and how this holiday speaks of political freedom and The Declaration of Independence is a whole document about freedom and detachment. “This, for the purpose of this celebration, is the 4th of July. It is the birthday of your National Independence, and of your political freedom” (Douglass, 1852). Proving that the day of independence is an important event in history. Both documents discuss the importance of Freedom. The Declaration of Independence shows that during that time the current king of Britain had his faults. As shown in the document they describe a list of things the King did wrong. “The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world” (The Declaration of Independence,1776). Through those facts the King of Britain is shown as not being very noble to the thirteen colonies, so they showed the general public what he did and how he was. Mr. Douglass also discusses the British crown in his article ‘You were under the British Crown. Your fathers esteemed the English Government as the home government; and England as the fatherland. This home government, you know, although a considerable distance from your home, did, in the exercise of its parental prerogatives, impose upon its colonial children, such restraints, burdens, and limitations” ( Douglass, 1852). Proving that the British king put burdens upon the colonies and stopped the colonies from the actions they were trying to take within The Declaration of Independence. Both Frederick Douglass and The Declaration share the same views within these moments.

In contrast, although Mr. Douglass praises the birthday of the Americas, he still does not fully agree with the definition of freedom for non-whites. “They believed in order; but not in the order of tyranny. With them, nothing was ‘settled’ that was not right. With them, justice, liberty and humanity were ‘final;’ not slavery and oppression” (Douglass, 1852). The Declaration of Independence indicates that all men are created equal but is this applied to non-whites. “Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us. The blessings in which you, this day, rejoice, are not enjoyed in common. The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity, and independence, bequeathed by your fathers, is shared by you, not by me” (Douglass, 1852). This view shows that the Declaration was not meant for all, but maybe for the White Americans. Mr. Douglass is proof that when he says in those words above this historical moment does not include the oppression of African Americans. Frederick Douglass continues about American slavery and how the slaves’ point of view was never including when the Declaration was made. The majority of both of these historical documents show that were plenty of differences and there should be changes.

Non-whites, as Frederick Douglass explains, are not considered in this day of independence “that the character and conduct of this nation never looked blacker to me than on this 4th of July! Whether we turn to the declarations of the past, or to the professions of the present, the conduct of the nation seems equally hideous and revolting” ( Douglass,1852). This explains why African Americans are not even considered free on America’s birthday. Mr. Douglass shows that non-whites should be free, but where is their freedom when the only words that can rarely be applied to African Americans are all men are created equal. Non-white Americans can view themselves as free in a sense that can do the same actions as White American can. “The Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled…That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States” (The Declaration of Independence,1776). This should be a sign that non-whites are free and should be part of this historical document. This leads to the oppression of non-white Americans, slavery within this time. “Oppression makes a wise man mad. Your fathers were wise men, and if they did not go mad, they became restive under this treatment. They felt themselves the victims of grievous wrongs, wholly incurable in their colonial capacity” (Douglass,1852). This statement can go both ways based upon the non-white Americans being oppressed. The non-whites were under horrific circumstances when going through slavery; they had no say and White Americans thought that was acceptable at the time. Non-white Americans have gone through too much unfairness. But is the Fourth of July a day non-white Americans should be celebrating? A quote from Mr.Douglass’ Speech says: “a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless” (Douglass,1852). This day of independence is for all the White Americans, but the non-white Americans had to fight for their rights. This holiday is not theirs and Frederick Douglass makes that clear throughout his speech speaking on the history of the Fourth of July.

Now looking at an FBI program called the Counterintelligence Program this begins back in the 1950s, 1956 to be exact. This program went against radical political groups. Parties like the Communist Party and they, later on, included the Ku Klux Klan. This program “was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at spying on, infiltrating, discrediting, disrupting and destroying domestic organizations considered ‘subversive” (FBI COINTELPRO, 2019). This program shows that there were always spies around to look upon these groups doing political wrongs. The purpose was to protect those from any violence, this program provides security for those being affected. “Prevent dangerous, and even potentially deadly, acts against individuals, organizations, and institutions – both public and private – across the United States” (Pike,2000). Although some of the groups involved were not violent, they were still being watched by the FBI in case it was to happen. The objective of the Counter Intelligence program was made to prevent foreign hostile threats from emerging an attack towards the United States to stop domestic political agendas of hostile enemies. But since then this program ended in April of 1971, so there was not much left of the program.

In conclusion, The Declaration of Independence and Frederick Douglass’s speech has plenty of similarities and differences and to this day things still need to change. There will always be oppression within Non-White Americans. So the Fourth of July may be an important day in history, but that does not mean that everyone can celebrate it. Also, the FBI may have run programs to help with security and violence, but they did do the job if it ended in the 1971’s. So, overall, we see the importance of the Fourth of July but there is so much more history behind that.