Category: 2nd Amendment

Extreme gun control is a mistake in the United States because according to the Second Amendment, people of the United States have the right to bear arms. If people have additional gun restrictions, there will be more safety issues due to the fact that people cannot defend themselves, there will be hunting conflicts gun control is not about guns, it is about control. The foundation of our country was built on the right to own and control firearms. It only makes sense that the freest nation on Earth have the most freedom when it comes to gun laws.

By taking away the freedom to own firearms, the government is restricting the country’s personal freedom. If absolute gun control stopped all crimes and school shootings there would be no debate or arguments made against gun control. This is clearly not the case due to the fact that in 2018 the United States faced more school shootings than ever before. Crime results not from weapons but from social factors they prefer to ignore and avoid, such as poverty, family trauma, world hunger, job opportunities, and peer pressure. Crime has existed since Biblical times, and criminals were not using gunpowder during that period, so why should this be any different in the world we live in today?

People of the United States who think gun control is working are wrong. Just because a law is put out there does not mean people are going to follow it. Laws are voluntary, when they are enforced people have a choice to make. Either follow them and be a law-abiding citizen or go against is and be a criminal. Some people have started calling gun control ‘gun safety’, however this is just a fancy way for advocators of gun control to make it seem like they are on both sides. After a while, the only thing left to ban is you. They have banned all the guns and before you know it, your freedom is gone.

I grew up in a small town called Waconia. It is north of the cities and a place where people shoot cans for sport. At school, it was normal for the hallways and classrooms to be empty on Nov. 15, because the opening day of deer season was practically a holiday. It isn’t uncommon for kids in my hometown to have shot a gun before the age of 10. I used to love shooting pistols at tree stumps for target practice. It is normal to see unloaded guns laying around my house. My dad, an avid hunter, raised me in a way that made me think that the right to bear arms is one of the greatest rights we have.

Hunting with my dad is one of my favorite things to do. And I’d give it up in a heartbeat. Being at college has given me an opportunity to form my own opinions and beliefs about certain issues. Every morning before class, I turn on my phone and read breaking news as I get ready for the day. It feels like every day there is a different horror story where someone is shot down like a dog in the street. Not everyone who owns a gun is an expert on using one. Almost every morning I see gun violence on the news. It makes me sad and embarrassed that our country hasn’t figured out an effective gun control method. The NRA claims that gun control shouldn’t be associated with any emotional outbreak. Why not?

According to a (Gun Control Legislation specialist in domestic security and crime policy) as of 2012, the U.S has so many guns that there’s nearly one firearm for every person who lives in the country. Privately held arsenal is growing at an extremely fast pace. There are 8 million firearms manufactured globally each year, and 4.5 million firearms are bought by people living in the U.S. Don’t be mistaken, this doesn’t mean that everyone is packing heat. In truth, the majority of our population is still unarmed. 43% of Americans have guns in their homes. As stated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. has over 11,000 homicides due to firearms each year. This amounts to about 70% of all homicides. Whether that rate seems high to you or not depends on your own personal thoughts. The U.S. isn’t the country with the most gun murders. That would be Honduras. However, there isn’t another country in the world with as many guns as the U.S.

Non-proliferation is a juridical action geared in obstruction and the possession of guns, particularly handguns. Alternatively, it is understood in consideration of larger point of view being legal restrictions as well as and limitation of actual custody and service of the shooting iron. Despite being constitutionally provided in the Second reform arms limitation is a controversial provision in the USA. On one hand, supporters about this notion argue on reduced access to shotguns will eventually reduce crime saving the lives which are unfortunately terminated due to homicides. On the other hand, the opponents disagree with reduction in accessibility of shooting iron since it infringes devoted civilians’ right to protecting themselves from danger and criminals. Well-regulated firearm ownership is a necessity to dependability of democratic state.

To support the thesis, concern of non-proliferation triggers necessity for appropriate interpretation of the further appeal to the US structure. This is a perambulation provision which is considered as it serves bring light the sense for Defense cut concern. The personage opinion might lead support this restriction in the ownership of the ordnance includes: the court’s decision on District of Colombia illuminates upcoming scholarly consensus that the Second Mending gives an entity mandate to control and take arms, equally there is no table evidence that indicates the reduction on rife ownership reduces crime rate, city inhabitants managing guns to enable them have self-protection against crime and criminal gangs, These were all seen to necessitate personal protection. Also, hunting supplemented dietary requirements was practiced as a commercial pursuit. Similarly, reinforcement of mortar ownership, Samuel Adams through composition of the populace nature has equally explicitly made alleged support for the personal takeover on cannon contrasted, it being entirely tied to the militia service. This is evidently raised in support of the further change.

According to Pew Research Centre research, concerning the facts about the cannon ownership in the USA, personal cannon ownership in the USA, personal protection tops the list. From a personal point of view, it is evidenced that an individual with a gun is more secured. For instance, those working in an office or an apartment are known to having privilege of holding rifles cannot be attached as opposed to those who have none, this goes to society and home level.

My personal view concerning The Second Reform in backing the acreage cannons, written law concerning the land has been given realism through allowing the free residents to have ambulation priority. This act of rifle accessibility is important since it is an inviolable and an inherent right of life in America. Once the vital authority is collectively or individually breached, the lone ability to protect against danger and tyranny altogether are retarded.

It may seem absurd when I bring in standpoint whereby the arm restriction may cause restriction to capability of USA authority when the civilian raises against the power it is possible avoiding to tyranny displayed through ruling agents. For example, 1911, in Turkey, Ottoman Empire killed 1.5 million Americans. Therefore, the support to cannon control curbs the situation of tyranny.

Contrast to opinions above for the argumentation the Second modification regarding the Gun control, the many issues which were equally considered includes: the Federal courts unanimously agreeing that the Second mending conserves the group authority of a nation to maintain militia, opposing expectation of a party interest to possess hardware for safeguard. This with exception of District of Colombia, increased gun accessibility by the individuals normally is associated by the citizens who take law in their own hands to deal with the suspects hence justice not being served as it is deserved and lastly the restriction is needed to curb the cases of homicides, murders, and accidents which are associated with the easy access to the guns.

Well-regulated firearm ownership is a necessity to the dependability of a free state, this a positive move and should be encouraged. Notably, a number of considerations should be put into place for the success of this move and for the benefit of all. Some of the considerations and recommendation are expanded backdrop analysis for machine acquisition, reinstatement of a communal ban on aggressive ammunitions; strict laws are enacted upon gun owners to curbing rising deaths, violence and crime which are related to the shotgun handling as a concern.

Works cited

1. Bellah, R. N. “Civil Religion, America”. Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Vol. 96, No. 1, (1967). Pg. 1-21.
2. Did the Sandy Hook Shooting Prove the Need for More Gun Control?. (n.d.). US News. Retrieved November 5, 2013, from http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/did-the-sandy-hook-shooting-prove-the-need-for-more-gun-control
3. District of Columbia v Heller. 554 U.S. Opinion of the Court. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf [accessed 10 Mar 2013] 2008.
4. Lipset, Seymour Martin. American Exceptionalism. New York: Norton. 1997. DOI: 10.2307/2675314
5. Pew Research. 2016. Gun Rights vs. Gun Control. http://www.people-press.org/2016/08/26/gun-rights-vs-gun-control/#total accessed 3 March 2017].