Biblical Account of Creation in Genesis in School

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Argument
Conclusion
Works Cited

Introduction

The question of creation of and universe has puzzled humankind for centuries. Various philosophers, rationalists and people from the scientific field have thought over this problem throughout their life and some have come up with their own explanations. However, the subject is still very controversial and an active topic of research. However, there is a recent debate that “The movement called Creation Science claims that the biblical account of creation in Genesis should be taught as science in public schools”. (Alibris, 1) However, it should not be treated as science on logical grounds.

Argument

The theory of Creation Science is an argument that is directed towards the establishment of the idea that there is existence of God, and God is the creator of the universe in accordance to creation myth stated in Genesis. It states that Darwinian Natural Selection is incorrect because there is a divine force that is responsible for the creation and sustainability of the universe as the universe is so intricately designed that it would be impossible to create it without a creator. Thus, the theory of biblical creation can well be enumerated as a part of religion, or even theology, but it can never be conceived as a science and thus there should be no argument on the topic that it should be included in school as a science subject.

Furthermore, there are several versions of creation and origin myths and they certainly cannot agree on a certain process of creation. Livingston indicates this point in a precise manner, he states “later Priestly and earlier J and E writers are markedly are different, and this is reflected in the central focus and other order of their respective Creation narratives. These differences can be seen most easily by setting them out in parallel columns“. (Livingston, 239) Thus, it is certain that there is not even a complete benchmark of the Creation Science as an argument.

The believers of Creation science try to strengthen the argument by contending that the purposive ness and seamless adaptation of the performance of natural objects with that of the universe was in the domain of ‘form’ only and not with regard to ‘substance’. They argued that a proof the latter, would have necessitated a clear and irrefutable evidence of the premise that the natural things in the world are also, in their ultimate material substance, products of the same supreme wisdom, to make them agreeable of being regulated by the universal laws. In absence of such a proof, the logic of automatic equivalence between the governing laws of natural things and that of the absolute necessity, viz., God, breaks down irreversibly.

The concept of the biblical creation as the repository of perfection being described by such superlative epithets as “very great”, “amazing” etc also suffers from indeterminacy. Since the magnitude of such perfection could not be widely determined, barring such idealistic concepts of “allness”, the concept has been rendered weak and hollow, and unable to lend itself any clarity and firmness, for a more deterministic enquiry of the same.

Conclusion

However, no matter how well argued these theories are; the bottom line remains simple. There are no mathematical derivations involved in it or any scientific method of proof and evidence based thesis. Science is heavily dependent on proof that is backed by mathematics or similar knowledge that could be termed as error free. The concept of the biblical creation lacks such hard evidence as proof. Thus, it remains a religion, at the most a philosophy, and not a science. Therefore, it is obvious that it should not be included in the curriculum of school as a part of science.

Works Cited

Alibris. “Reviews of Creationist Books”. Nielsen Book Services Limited, Muze, Inc. 2009. Baker & Taylor, Inc. 2009. Web.

Livingston, James C. Anatomy of the sacred: an introduction to religion. Ed 4. NY: Prentice Hall, 2001.

Click Here To Order Now!

Biblical Account of Creation in Genesis in School

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)