Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Introduction
Although Buddha was a religious philosopher, his philosophy of The Middle Way shows several similarities with Aristotles theory of virtue and moderation. Noteworthy, Aristotle was a philosopher with little links to religion. The purpose of this paper is to review each of the two theories and develop a comparison between them.
Aristotles virtue and moderation ethics
Aristotle argues that an individual develops partly from his or her upbringing and partly from the habit adapted in action. Human character partly comes from habit. Aristotle likens human character to such things as skills, which are obtained from the interaction with the environment. Each character displayed by humans can be excellent or deficient. Being on the extremes of excess or deficiency causes an individual to go beyond the norm.
Buddhas Middle Way
The middle way, as described by Siddhartha Gautama, is a character of the middle path or central way through which humans archive liberation. Buddha uses this term in reference to the noble pathway or middle way that helps people achieve Nirvana. This term is in contrast to the paths of extremities described by eternalism and annihilationism that may lead humans out of the virtue. According to Buddha, this path passes between the extremities and uses wisdom. In addition, Buddha says that the extremities of sensual indulgence and self-mortification are not good because they are vices in nature and lead humans astray because they are not based on the light of wisdom.
Comparison
The two theories advocate for a middle position between tow edges of extremities. They argue that a person can remain ethical (in Aristotles theory) and righteous (in Buddhas advice) if they choose between the extremities of good and evil. Being too good or too bad is not only wrong, but leads to the wrong state.
Conclusion
The two theories indicate that a morally right person (In Aristotles theory) and a righteous person (In Buddhas theory) should not go to the extremes .
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.