Aristotle’s View of Ethics and Happiness

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Aristotle’s View of Ethics and Happiness. The ‘functionalist’ approach of Aristotle’s ethics

Aristotle guarantees that to find the human great, we should recognize the capacity of an individual. He contends that human capacity is solely a sane action (Aristotle et al., 2004). Our virtue is hence reasonable movement performed well, which Aristotle interprets as meaning as per temperance. ‘Function’ may not mean reason yet rather a method of working. The manner in which people act is by settling on logical decisions. The human great is not simply a consequence of balanced decision but comprises in it. Aristotle’s demands that there are no known ethics and that any moral hypothesis should be situated to a limited extent on comprehension of psychology and the real factors in daily human existence (Aristotle et al., 2004).

Aristotle’s definition of happiness and how does it differ from common sense use of the term ‘happiness’

Happiness is characterized as the constant consideration of generally accepted facts as indicated by the philosopher (Aristotle et al., 2004). It is the most noteworthy great and the end toward which all human action is coordinated. Aristotle recognizes that such factors can influence it as material conditions, place in the public eye, and even looks (Aristotle et al., 2004). In any case, an individual keeps up with that by carrying on with their life to the full as per the fundamental nature as sane creatures. Along these lines, an individual will undoubtedly become happy. Thus, happiness is more an issue of conduct and of propensity than of karma. It goes against the common thought that happiness does not result from great destiny or other outer conditions or that bliss is an instance of the mind.

The happy person for Aristotle. Why cannot say of children that they are ‘happy’

One accomplishes bliss by a temperate life and the improvement of reason and the personnel of hypothetical insight. An individual who develops such practices and propensities can bear his hardships with equilibrium and viewpoint and, consequently, can never be really sad. Thus, a child who did not have an opportunity to show his virtue cannot be “happy.”

Socrates’ position on what is the good life and Aristotle’s conception of Happiness

Socrates presented a more targeted perspective on happiness. He set forth the thought that joy is a delight in magnificence and great. He presented the possibility that the best life is one whereby an individual seeks the joy of practicing scholarly ideals. This is a contention that Aristotle did not support since, forhim, delight and pain impact human activities, which will then, at that point, impact happiness (Aristotle et al., 2004).

Reference

Aristotle. (2004). The Nicomachean Ethics. (T. J. A. K., H. Tredennick, & J. Barnes, Eds.). Penguin Books.

Click Here To Order Now!

Aristotle’s View of Ethics and Happiness

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)