Allowing Licensing of Hunting in the United States

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Aubry, P., Guillemain, M., & Sorrenti, M. (2020). Increasing the trust in hunting bag statistics: why random selection of hunters is so important. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 117, 1-13. Web.

Aubry et al. (2020) investigate the reliability of hunting bags, a data source for studies on harvested species in reporting population abundance, and the use of such data, including the study of predator-prey relationships, population fluctuation, and game species. The article provides approaches to assessing the rate of hunting with specific numbers obtained in the previous hunting bags while discussing the validity and comparison of each method. Authors show that different hunting statistics are biased following the volunteer approach through online and phone interviews and questionnaires, leading to wrong and subjective wildlife harvesting indicators. The study is essential in the study providing estimated data on hunting to support an argument on the extent of the activity and, therefore, its impact on humans, society, economic growth, and income. The statistics and view on the partial data are essential to verify and defend other information from other researches in the study about the nature and extent of hunting alongside the journey on hunting in the US.

Bilgic, A., Florkowski, W. J., Yoder, J., & Schreiner, D. F. (2008). Estimating fishing and hunting leisure spending shares in the United States. Journal of Tourism Management, 29(4), 771-782. Web.

Bilgic et al. (2008) investigate the relationship between spending on hunting and fishing for leisure in the US, arguing that the two compliments each other with a projected decline in hunting for fishing following differences in expenses and income. The article provides details about the economic benefits of hunting, including payment from the entrance fee and transport cost to the site that has increased following a decrease in Americans’ leisure time. Although hunting and fishing provide the same benefits to a tourist and a hunter, fishing is taking over hunting due to low expenses and more economic benefits, although there is increased income from the activity. The source supports the argument on hunting’s economic benefits, including income to the government through tourism and wages to locals through activities and other related services. The article will also guide in concluding the best approach to control hunting following information on alternative activities, fishing with similar benefits but fewer risks to the environment.

Chapagain, B. P., & Poudyal, N. C. (2020). Economic benefit of wildlife reintroduction: A case of elk hunting in Tennessee, USA. Journal of environmental management, 269, 1-8. Web.

The article analyzes the restoration of elks and their related hunting in the US with main issues such as the cost of reintroduction and benefits of wildlife which include hunting to provide economic benefits to the country and hunters. Chapagain and Poudyal (2020) demonstrate that the wildlife’s economic benefits, both met and unmet, are approximately $2 million and influences policies that favor support in restoring wild animals, with an example of elks in Tennessee. The article provides essential details on hunting’s benefits, including economic benefits to the government through entrance fees to the conservancy, income to the hunters, and animal transporters. Hunting is a recreational activity that provides social and economic paybacks to the community next to the site as they play games with tourists watching. The article is essential in studying licensing hunting in the US by providing details about the economic benefits, supporting the argument on revenue-making through sports hunting.

Di Minin, E., Clements, H. S., Correia, R. A., Cortés-Capano, G., Fink, C., Haukka, A., Hausmann, A., Kulkarni, R. & Bradshaw, C. J. (2021). Consequences of recreational hunting for biodiversity conservation and livelihoods. One Earth, 4(2), 238-253. Web.

Di Minin et al. (2021) investigates the impact of recreational hunting on socioeconomic and sustainability benefits while arguing that past studies fail to focus on some extinct species and, therefore, fail to show the actual effects of the two advantages. The authors show that studies demonstrate adverse outcomes on species conservation through recreational hunting, with some small animals and birds becoming a threat to extinction with socioeconomic benefits while others reveal advantages in the two variables. Among the advantages of recreational hunting includes reduced funds for anti-poaching programs, but in some cases and areas, the resources needed to fight poaching increase as people learn the benefits of wild animals in improving socioeconomic factors. The source is vital in providing details to and against hunting in areas such as economic, cultural, and social to argue in the case of licensing the activity in the US. Authors include vital details that show the value of hunting on the community from different studies to summarize the actual effects and argue on the activities’ ethics.

Notarangelo, R. (2016). Hunting Down the Meaning of the Second Amendment: An American Right to Pursue Game. South Dakota Law Review, 61(2), 201-241. Web.

Notarangelo (2016) deconstructs the second amendment to evaluate the various perspectives on its accommodation or lack, therefore of hunting following court decisions and comments from other scholars. The author analyses and compares the foundation of laws of carrying guns in American history based on hunting alongside the second amendment. Findings indicate that the second amendment provides Americans’ right to carry guns for hunting, although it was essential to prevent criminal activities associated with carrying firearms, especially in wildlife sites. Following a historical analysis, the authors provide that hunting is an ethical and custom practice and benefits Americans through gaming and income where hunters sell the animals and use them for food. The source helps provide information to support the ethical nature of hunting, its economic benefits to the community and individual members, and its dangers to humans and society.

Rosin, C. (2014). Does hunting threaten timber regeneration in selectively logged tropical forests? Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 331, 153-164. Web.

Rosin (2014) explores the topics of plant-animal interaction that affects timber production in quality and quantity from vital species and the influence of hunting on the relationship. The authors argue that improper management of the relationship between plants, animals, and hunting risks forest biodiversity, timber production, and forest land conversation for non-forest purposes. The article provides details about the conducive environment for proper growth of tree species to produce good wood where hunted animals make up the ecosystem, helping in seed dispersion and control of other plants that compete for nutrients air in the forest. There are also details on the effects of hunting on such an ecosystem where hunters target vital animals, including large ones that can spread huge seeds for good timber trees. The source is crucial to support discussion on the impact of hunting on the structure of Earth’s ecosystems by providing details on how hunters take away important animals with further influence or some plant species.

Strong, M., & Silva, J. A. (2020). Impacts of hunting prohibitions on multidimensional well-being. Journal of Biological Conservation, 243, 1-9. Web.

The article reports findings from an investigation on the impact of burning hunting on households, with authors arguing that the prohibition leads to impoverished lives in rural areas where people depend on animals for income and food. Strong and Silva (2020) demonstrate the limitations of wildlife in human life, including the destruction of livestock, damage to crops, and loss of lives, while showing that such animals can benefit through hunting by providing food to low-income families. More details about the significance of hunting reveal cultural and social treasure in poaching, for instance, defiance, following marginalization and dehumanization of people compared to animals where the government provides more protection to the various sites. The source is essential to give details about the history of hunting and its significance to the community that might support its existence. Information on rural hunting is also vital in showing the extent of the activity to defend its impact on the erosion of ecosystems and other benefits such as low quality and quality of timber.

References

Aubry, P., Guillemain, M., & Sorrenti, M. (2020). Increasing the trust in hunting bag statistics: why random selection of hunters is so important. Journal of Ecological Indicators, 117, 1-13. Web.

Bilgic, A., Florkowski, W. J., Yoder, J., & Schreiner, D. F. (2008). Estimating fishing and hunting leisure spending shares in the United States. Journal of Tourism Management, 29(4), 771-782. Web.

Chapagain, B. P., & Poudyal, N. C. (2020). Economic benefit of wildlife reintroduction: A case of elk hunting in Tennessee, USA. Journal of environmental management, 269, 1-8. Web.

Notarangelo, R. (2016). Hunting Down the Meaning of the Second Amendment: An American Right to Pursue Game. South Dakota Law Review, 61(2), 201-241. Web.

Rosin, C. (2014). Does hunting threaten timber regeneration in selectively logged tropical forests? Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 331, 153-164. Web.

Strong, M., & Silva, J. A. (2020). Impacts of hunting prohibitions on multidimensional well-being. Journal of Biological Conservation, 243, 1-9. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!

Allowing Licensing of Hunting in the United States

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)