A Middle Ground of the Nature vs. Nurture Debate

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Self-esteem and self-efficacy
Self-awareness
Nature and Nurture
Conclusion
References

Introduction

Working in an organization with people who differ from each other in many ways is always extremely difficult. A person must have a good understanding of ethical norms, moral norms, respect for other people’s traditions and religions in order to successfully establish communication. However, the personal difficulties for me are the establishment of interaction with people with mental disabilities. In some situations, their emotional background is less stable and causes a constant fear of offending them.

Moreover, sometimes one can say a sloppy phrase and cause a person to have an emotional surge. Nevertheless, when communicating with people who have mental disorders, a bridge can be established. First of all, this is a respectful attitude on an equal footing and not focusing on those things that seem unusual in their behavior. The main thing is to establish a predictable working atmosphere where it will be easier for a person to adapt to changes. At the same time, the category that is easiest to understand is ethnic. People of a different culture always arouse lively interest and the bridge for establishing communication is based on interest in their culture and traditions. In addition, one should not focus on differences in appearance, as this can be offensive.

Self-esteem and self-efficacy

Self-esteem and self-efficacy are essential factors when working or learning. I believe that I have adequate self-esteem, which helps me a lot. I realistically assess my skills and abilities, without downplaying them or exaggerating my importance. As far as self-efficacy is concerned, it is high and I look at difficulties as something that can be overcome with the necessary effort (Minev et al., 2018). These two traits have a significant impact on my behavioral strategy, especially when it comes to learning and work.

High efficiency gives me more strength, thus I am able to study longer and have perseverance. It allows me to be more motivated, which is essential in order to meet work and study expectations. At the same time, adequate self-esteem gives me a sound and accurate criticism of what I am doing and whether I have enough opportunities at this stage to achieve the goal. It helps to build the right relationship with colleagues, where everyone treats each other with respect. Thus, self-efficacy and self-esteem play an important role in life and are a way for a person to feel comfortable in society.

Self-awareness

In the process of socialization, a person learns to live in a group and define his own self as an individual. Self-awareness allows a person to make conscious decisions and bear the accompanying responsibility for them (Minev et al., 2018). In the case of a colleague who needs help with a report, my answer will be unambiguous, but soft. I will gladly be able to help her when I am done with my work, as I have a well-defined deadline for completing the task.

My stress level is quite low, however, I understand that circumstances may arise that will stall my work and I will not be able to meet the set time. Explaining this fact politely to a colleague will help avoid misunderstandings. At the same time, I am confident in the self-awareness of the other person, thanks to which he will understand me. The colleague must know that I am working and completing the task now is more paramount than completing the report, since the deadlines are clearly set. As a result, I think that my answer should not offend her. In an organization, each colleague is responsible for certain actions and must first complete them. Help is vital to establishing relationships at work, but it should not be at odds with your own comfort and commitment.

Nature and Nurture

The question of the formation of human characteristics by nature and nurture arose long ago. Over the years, it has caused debate and controversy regarding the extent to which one or the other factor influences personality and differences. However, both conditions affect the formation of the individual and its subsequent integration into society. Thus, nature and nurture are integral parts of one whole, which cannot be considered separately from each other.

Nature refers to those factors that are noted as innate and biological. This includes the aspect of heredity of a particular genetic set. Nature has a biological character and influences the formation of a person in the framework of their psychopathology, behavioral characteristics and personality as a whole (Lerner, 2018). It affects the initial stages of fetal development and determines the subsequent adaptation in society (Osher et al., 2018). Moreover, genes determine the behavioral patterns of a person in various conditions and situations. Thus, everyone has a unique genetic composition that determines the reaction to stressful circumstances. The factor of nature accounts for the physical and mental qualities of a person, which are set by a genetic limit and cannot be overcome. As a result, some personal qualities are presented even before the birth of the child.

At the same time, each person has a certain potential, which is determined by the environment of the individual. The environment and the accompanying nurture of the individual determines the correlation factors between the society in which the person grew up and the psychological consequences of this (Lerner, 2018). Moreover, it should be said that social status largely determines a person’s self-identification and his confidence in the future (Barlow, 2019). In some situations, the environment fully reveals the potential of a person and allows him to quickly adapt in society.

On the other hand, it may reduce the individual’s ability to determine personality characteristics and desires. In the first place, the development of a child is influenced by parents or guardians. If they neglect the interests and desires of children, then teenagers with low self-esteem grow out of them. This has a devastating effect on the potential of the child, even if they have incredible external or mental abilities. Thus, from an intersectional point of view, it can be concluded that nature and nurture determine the personality of a person to an early degree.

Additionally, both of these factors do not work in isolation from each other, but together. Genes determine the behavioral direction of a person, but they are arranged in such a way that they are amenable to the influence of nurture (Lerner, 2018). The environment can influence genetics and determine the psychological qualities of subsequent generations. The harmful habits of the biological parents and the accompanying changes in their health can be passed on at the genetic level. As a result, from a biological point of view, this can have a severe effect on the child, which cannot be corrected by subsequent education.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it should be said that nature or nurture have a huge impact on the formation of a person’s personal qualities. Both factors reveal the possible potential of each individual, with the help of which people determine their future. In addition, nature or nurture work as two interrelated paths of development. Nature reveals a genetic set that can be influenced by the success or failure of a child’s upbringing. Thus, both paths are equally important and should be considered not in terms of debate, but of combined possibilities for studying the behavior of the individual.

References

Barlow, F. K. (2019). Nature vs. nurture is nonsense: On the necessity of an integrated genetic, social, developmental, and personality psychology. Australian journal of psychology, 71(1), 68-79.

Lerner, R. M. (2018). Concepts and theories of human development. Routledge.

Minev, M., Petrova, B., Mineva, K., Petkova, M., & Strebkova, R. (2018). Self-esteem in adolescents. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 16(2), 114-118.

Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2020). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development1. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6-36.

Click Here To Order Now!