What gives someone the right to pay a low price for committing acts of violence?

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

What gives someone the right to pay a low price for committing acts of violence?

This class has videos and reading then you need to write a short essay on it and answer follow up questions and I really need to get an 100 percent.
this is the reading and videos: Masculinity And Violence
Cornerstone: Violence is a cost-effective way of reaching a large audience. Violence is gendered male, and the media use of violence teaches audiences that men are best suited for positions of authority.
Violence Is Inexpensive
The ideal media product is inexpensive to make and can be sold to as many customers as possible. Violence is inexpensive to produce. It does not require highly-paid actors, directors, script writers or technicians. It does not require special effects.
Boxing and wrestling provide an illustration. Boxing and wrestling were on the air for hours each night Monday through Friday during the first full season of television programming in the U.S., 1948-1949. The shows were inexpensive to produce and thus filled hours of programming time at a very low cost.
But low cost alone does not make for a product that creates profits. The product also must be sold. In media terms, this means that the text has to create an audience.
Violence Is Comprehensible
The real value of violent stories is in their ability to communicate with a wide variety of audiences. This means that the same text can be used to gather a wide variety of different audiences.
It is the difference between, for example, writing a book that is understandable only to the students at Santa Monica College and writing a book that is understandable to every community college student in the U.S. If those two books cost the same amount to research and write, the profit potential for the second one obviously is far greater.
Academics say that violent texts travel well. They consist mostly of visual images that depict the violent act. And violent images can convey simply, basic ideas accurately and effectively to a wide range of people. They do not require an audience member to have an advanced education, speak a particular language, be of a certain age, or even understand the practices and values of a particular society.
Consider the following quote from former Santa Monica College student Jiye Lee: “For example, ‘Terminator,’ the movie I watched when I was young, has Korean subtitle, but I was too young to read that quickly because the subtitle was passed so quickly. However, the movie has so much action scenes and the images helped me to understand the story of the film.”
It is for these reasons that violent texts dominate our media landscape. By the time a child born in the U.S. is 18, he or she will have seen about 16,000 simulated murders and 200,000 acts of violence, according to the American Psychiatric Association. That number would be much larger if we were to include the real-world violent acts of sports and depictions of violence on news programming.
The Lessons Of Violence
Violence comes at a price in our mediated world. There are, obviously, the people who commit violence and the people who suffer violent acts against them.
Gerbner’s body of work incorporates an idea known as the victim/victimizer ratio. It is the number of times someone from a group suffers an act of violence compared to the number of times someone from that group commits an act of violence. Suffering an act of violence increases the price a group pays for committing a violent act.
For the purpose of understanding violence in mass commercial media texts, we will say that the higher the price a group pays for committing an act of violence, the less they are socially authorized to use violence – the less they should be doing it, in other words.
Gerbner’s studies show that in television stories, women, young women, poor people, old people and people of color pay a disproportionately high price for committing acts of violence. They are most likely to be shown as victims.
White males of middle age (typically old enough to be a father, or at least married) and middle income typically pay the lowest price of all. They commit violence with relatively little penalty and often receive rewards for committing violence. This formula of gender, race, age and income is so prevalent, so powerful, that if the protagonist of a story deviates from one of these characteristics, the script frequently will be written to include the missing element in another character.
What gives someone the right to pay a low price for committing acts of violence? In media texts, people who commit violence against the right people, at the right time, for the right reasons rarely are punished.
How does someone know when to commit violence, and against which people? Intelligence.
How does someone know the right reasons for committing violence, when and why to do so?
Morality.
So, to connect the dots: Mediated violence shows white, middle-age, middle-income men paying a very low price for committing acts of violence. People pay a low price for committing acts of violence if they exhibit intelligence and morality while doing so. So the real lesson of violence in our media environment is that white, middle-age, middle-income men are not just powerful, but intelligent and moral.
Pornography
Pornography occupies a much larger place in the media environment than it would appear to on first glance. On any given day, a gateway website, chaturbate.com, which links viewers to live pornographic depictions, will appear among the top 20 or so most-visited websites in the U.S. To illustrate its popularity, on the day this paragraph was written, Aug. 17, 2020, chaturbate.com was visited more frequently than cnn.com, walmart.com, twitter.com and linkedin.com.
Most of the visitors to the site are men. Most view the site from home.
According to the web analytics website alexa.com, the average visitor to pornhub.com spent nearly 12 minutes on the site and viewed more than eight pages while there.
And this is just one pornographic website, one of many portals to an entire universe of other sites.
But there is little public discussion about the amount of pornography that is consumed. The fact of pornographic viewing is a point of brief, often humorous social conversation. Deep discussions about what is seen and the underlying ideologies are rare. Most pornography is consumed by heterosexual men while they are alone.
So pornography tends to have a significant impact on the world view of its consumers. Socialization takes place as people “test” their ideas in their day-to-day interactions with others. People get feedback from other people and learn – quickly – whether a behavior or an idea gets them praise or criticism, social approval or rejection. Since pornography is not the subject of deep discussion, the ideas and ideologies within those texts are not put to the “test ” of real- world feedback. Pornography is a text that is consumed privately, and the lessons contained within are internalized without further analysis.
Pornography is not simply images of people having sex. Upon closer study, pornography tells a story about power and authority. Pornography is a world where heterosexual men get what they want from women, and enforce their demands with physical and verbal aggression.
Physical aggression, obviously, is depicted in images, and as discussed above, violent images travel well; they need not be translated into other languages, and they are comprehensible to a wide range of consumers in every society. In addition, when men act aggressively in this world, they are rewarded with sex.
Pornography depicts a world where men are powerful and authoritative and women do what they are told to do by men, or are willing to do what men want them to do without being told.
The critical element of the narrative of pornography is the “nature,” or characteristics, of each gender. In this world, men are powerful and women are not. And as discussed before, what audiences learn through cultivation are the characteristics associated with groups of people.
The lessons about the characteristics of men and women in pornography are carried over by the watchers of pornography into their views on the characteristics of women and men outside of the world of pornography.Please read “Porn and Violence” below and be able to describe the lessons of gender, power
and authority – and how they are told and reinforced – as they are depicted in popular
pornography.
Aggression And Sexual Behavior In Best-Selling Pornography Videos: A Content Analysis
Update.
– Bridges AJ, Wosnitzer R, Scharrer E, Sun C, Liberman R., University of Arkansas,
Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. abridges@uark.edu
This current study analyzes the content of popular pornographic videos, with the objectives of
updating depictions of aggression, degradation, and sexual practices and comparing the
study’s results to previous content analysis studies. Findings indicate high levels of
aggression in pornography in both verbal and physical forms. Of the 304 scenes analyzed,
88.2% contained physical aggression, principally spanking, gagging, and slapping, while
48.7% of scenes contained verbal aggression, primarily name-calling. Perpetrators of
aggression were usually male, whereas targets of aggression were overwhelmingly female.
Targets most often showed pleasure or responded neutrally to the aggression.
The study defines aggression in the following manner:
Aggression. Aggressive acts were recorded according to two specific subtypes: verbal and
physical. Physically aggressive acts were (a) pushing or shoving; (b) biting; (c) pinching; (d)
pulling hair; (e) spanking; (f) open-hand slapping; (g) gagging (defined as when an object or
body part, e.g., penis, hand, or sex toy, is inserted into a character’s mouth, visibly obstruct-
ing breathing); (h) choking (when one character visibly places his or her hands around
another character’s throat with applied pressure); (i) threatening with weapon; (j) kicking; (k)
closed- fist punching; (l) bondage or confining; (m) using weapons; and (n) torturing,
mutilating, or attempting murder. Verbally aggressive acts were (a) name calling or insulting
and (b) threat- ening physical harm. Coders indicated whether each scene contained verbal
aggression (yes/ no) and physical aggression (yes/no).
Aggression
On the whole, the pornographic scenes analyzed in this study were aggressive; only 10.2% (n
= 31) of scenes did not contain an aggressive act. Across all scenes, a total of 3,375 verbally
and physically aggressive acts were observed (Table 1). Of these, 632 were coded as
instances of verbal aggression and 2,743 were coded as instances of physical aggression.
On average, scenes had 11.52 acts of either verbal or physical aggression (SD = 15.04) and
ranged from none to 128. Physical aggression (M = 9.31, SD = 12.30) was much more
common than verbal aggression (M = 2.13, SD = 4.01), occurring in 88.2% (n = 268) of the
scenes, whereas expressions of verbal aggression occurred in 48.7% (n = 148) of the
scenes. By far, the most common verbally aggressive act was name calling (e.g., “bitch,”
“slut”; n = 614, or 97.2% of all 632 verbally aggressive acts). Spanking (35.7% of physically
aggressive acts; n = 980), gagging (27.7%; n = 759), and open-hand slapping (14.9%; n =
408) were the most frequently observed physically aggressive acts. Other physically
aggressive acts recorded included hair- pulling (10.1%; n = 276), choking (6.7%; n = 184),
and bondage or confinement (1.1%; n = 30).
None of the scenes showed characters who threatened one another with a weapon, hit one
another with a closed fist, or tortured and mutilated each other.
Women were overwhelmingly the targets of aggressive acts (Table 2). Across all acts of
aggression, both physical and verbal, 94.4% (n = 3,191) were directed toward women. Men
were the perpetrators of aggression more than twice as often as women, committing 70.3% (n
= 2,373) of the aggressive acts recorded. In contrast, women were perpetrators of 29.4% (n =
991) of all aggressive acts. Even when women were perpetrators, their targets were
frequently other women (17.7%; n = 598). Men were targets of only 4.2% (n = 143) of
aggressive acts perpetrated by women. Male-to-male aggression was present in only 0.3% (n
= 11) of the recorded instances and was most often verbal (only 4 instances of physical
aggression with a male perpetrator and a male target were recorded).
There were significant differences in the types of aggressive acts males and females
experienced, χ2(13) = 234.51, p < .001. Women were significantly more likely to be spanked, choked, and gagged than men. Aggregately speaking across the sample spectrum, women were verbally insulted or referred to in derogatory terms 534 times, whereas men experienced similar verbal assaults in only 65 instances. Women were spanked on 953 occasions, visibly gagged 756 times, experienced an open-hand slap 361 times, had their hair pulled or yanked on 267 separate occasions, and were choked 180 times. Men, however, were spanked only 26 times, experienced an open-hand slap in 47 instances, and for all other aggressive acts, were aggressed against fewer than 10 times. When aggressed against, 95.1% (n = 3,206) of targets responded with either expressions of pleasure (e.g., encouragement, sexual moans) or neutrally (e.g., no change in facial expres- sion or interruption to actions). There was a significant difference between female and male target responses to aggressive acts, χ2(1) = 51.31, p < .001. Women were significantly more likely to express pleasure or neutrality when aggressed against (95.9%; n = 3,049) than men (84.0%; n = 147). In contrast, men were four times more likely to show displeasure when aggressed against (16.0%, n = 28) compared with women (4.1%; n = 132) HERE IS THE VIDEO and this is the questions:QUESTION 1: What is the lesson of pornography in terms of gender, power and authority? Why is it important to recognize the lessons of gender characteristics in pornography? Answer should be at least 200 words total. PART 2 Based only on the information in your video lecture on pornography, answer the following questions. Follow the format in the Introduction module. Remember that using material other than what is in the video lecture will result in the loss of points. 1. What are the two reasons it is important to discuss pornography? 2. What do you need to understand if you want to know what males in the U.S. are taught on a regular basis? 3. What are the two words used to describe the narratives of pornography? 4. According to the researcher cited at the end of the lecture, pornography is a what? if answers are above 3 sentences divide into paragraphs PLEASE DIVIDE THESE CLEARLY INTO PART 1 AND 2.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!