Unit 3: Assignment – Case Study Due: Sun Jan 28, 2024 11:59pmDue: Sun Jan 28, 20

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Unit 3: Assignment – Case Study
Due: Sun Jan 28, 2024 11:59pmDue: Sun Jan 28, 20

Unit 3: Assignment – Case Study
Due: Sun Jan 28, 2024 11:59pmDue: Sun Jan 28, 2024 11:59pm
Ungraded, 50 Possible Points50 Points Possible
Attempt
In Progress
NEXT UP: Submit Assignment
Add Comment
Unlimited Attempts Allowed
Details
Review Pena v. Fox on textbook pages 11-5 and 11-6.
Download and fill out the Case Study Template. See pages 3 and 4 of the template for helpful tips.
Click here: Case Study Template
Case Study Tips:
* If you have difficulty downloading the Case Study template using the provided link, you can also access the template posted in the “Instructor’s Office Area” or by clicking on “Files” link located in the left navigation menu.
*Plagiarism Reminder: Do not merely copy and paste text from the case. Summarize the content in your own words, reflecting your understanding of the materials. Do not copy and paste materials from Course Hero, Chegg, etc. Do not submit materials created by Chat GPT.
Use this link to learn about how to avoid plagiarism: Johns Hopkins Sheridan Libraries. (n.d.). Avoiding plagiarism: Paraphrasing and summarizing. Retrieved from http://lib.usm.edu/plagiarism_tutorial/howto_para_summ.htmlLinks to an external site.
Late Policy: The Unit 3 Case Study is due by 11:59 pm CT, Sunday January 28. Late work received on Monday morning January 29 will receive no higher than a C. After Monday morning at 10 AM, Central, late work will receive a zero. (You may submit late work for feedback from the instructor.)
VIEW ALL UNIT PAGES
View Rubric
Case Study (2)
Case Study (2)
CriteriaRatingsPts
Contentview longer description
25 to >23 pts
Content is focused and specific; correctly identifies all the brief elements–parties, history, etc. Legal issue is clearly identified.
23 to >19.9 pts
Content is clear but in limited places has a shifting focus or lacks specificity; correctly identifies the legal issue; most of the remaining brief elements are correct
19.9 to >17.4 pts
Content is clear, but in multiple places has shifting focus and lacks specificity. Legal issues are identified but not in clear or specific in detail; the remaining brief elements are correct with some mistakes
17.4 to >14 pts
Content is unclear, inconsistent, or incomplete; legal issue is not correctly identified; few of remaining brief elements are correct
14 to >0 pts
Content is unclear and limited; legal issue is not correctly identified or is missing; most remaining brief elements are incorrect
/ 25 pts
Analysis
view longer description
15 to >13.4 pts
Presents an exemplary and thorough analysis; answers questions with logical, concise, and clear reasoning
13.4 to >11.9 pts
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis; answers questions with logical reasoning
11.9 to >10.4 pts
Presents a thorough analysis; understandable answers to questions
10.4 to >5.9 pts
Makes at effort at analysis, but reasoning is unclear or inconsistent; answers to questions are not thorough or consistent
5.9 to >0 pts
Superficial or incomplete analysis or makes no effort at analysis; answers to questions are irrelevant or incomprehensible
/ 15 pts
Appearance (Grammar/Readability)
view longer description
10 to >8.9 pts
No more than 1 grammar error; effective word choice and sentence variety; superior facility with the conventions of standard written English; ideas are developed logically with flow between sentences and paragraphs
8.9 to >7.9 pts
Few grammar errors (< 3); competent word choice and sentence variety; competence with the conventions of standard written English; ideas expressed with clear overall organization 7.9 to >6.9 pts
Some grammar errors (4-7); word choice and sentence structure are unvaried; average familiarity with standard written English; ideas loosely organized with inadequate transitions; some ideas are illogical or unrelated
6.9 to >3.9 pts
Grammar needs work (8-10 errors); poor word choice and sentence structure; below average familiarity with standard written English; ideas are not coherently expressed; overall organization is lacking
3.9 to >0 pts
Frequent grammar errors (>10); significant problems in word choice or sentence structure; ideas not developed or organized; uneven or ineffective overall organization
/ 10 pts
Total Points: 0
Choose a submission type
Submission type Upload, currently selectedUploadMore submission optionsMore

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!