Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
As Dr. Rempher and Ms. Manna discussed this week, data from the NDNQI is used to
As Dr. Rempher and Ms. Manna discussed this week, data from the NDNQI is used to improve nursing practices and support the strategic outcomes of an organization. This data is also used to create the Dashboard. The Dashboard, then, is used to create an action plan. Correctly interpreting information presented on the Dashboard provides nurses with a better understanding of the goals of the action plan.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare
For this Assignment, use the Dashboard located in this week’s Resources, to interpret the data and frame a nursing plan based on best practices.
• Review the Week 5 Assignment Rubric. The Week 5 Assignment Rubric can be found at the bottom of the Week 5 Assignment page.
• Review the Week 4 Resources that pertain to the NDNQI and use of dashboards
• Choose a Nurse-Sensitive Quality Indicator that needs improvement based on the data presented in the Dashboard. Reflect on how you would develop a nursing plan with suggestions on how to improve performance in the chosen area.
• Develop a nursing plan that outlines suggestions on how to improve performance in the chosen area.
• Provide at least three best practices from evidenced-based literature to support your nursing plan.
Assignment
• Draft a 3- to 4 page paper analyzing areas where there is good performance and areas of opportunity from the sample Dashboard.
• Analyze the data provided in the Dashboard and select an area of performance that needs improvement. Include information on why this area was chosen.
• Develop a nursing plan that includes suggestions on how to improve performance on the selected indicator. Be sure to provide at least three best practices from the evidenced-based literature to support your suggested nursing plan.
• Be sure to include an introduction and conclusion in your paper.
• Use the Walden University course paper template found in the Writing Resources page.
Note that no abstract or running head is required.
This Assignment is due on Week 5 Day 7. It will be assessed using the Week 5 Assignment Rubric.
This Assignment, assigned last week, is due. Prior to submitting your Assignment, make sure to review the Week 5 Assignment Rubric.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_4005_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_4005_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvided a brief paragraph that included an overview of the assignment and its purpose. 20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 17 to >15.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 15 to >13.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 13 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresented an analysis of the data from the Sample Dashboard. Provided a thorough descriiption of the area of performance selected that needs improvement and discussed the statistical findings and why the area was selected. 60 to >53.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 53 to >47.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 47 to >41.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 41 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresented a nursing plan on three or more best practices that could be implemented to improve performance on the selected indicator. Included how each best practice could address the selected performance. Each best practice was supported by the professional literature. 120 to >107.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues 107 to >95.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 95 to >83.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 83 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performancewith little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
120 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvided a summary of the main points in the paper. 20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed summary of the main points with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 17 to >15.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed summary of the main points with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 15 to >13.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally-developed summary of the main points with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 13 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed summary of the main points with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization 10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized. 8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized. 7 to >6.0 pts
Basic
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision. 6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone 10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. 8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. 7 to >6.0 pts
Basic
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. 6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas 10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. 8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. 7 to >6.0 pts
Basic
Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. 6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference.
10 pts
Total Points: 250
PreviousNext
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We have qualified writers to help you.
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount