60s Generation vs. Modern Generation

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Table of Contents

Introduction
Main body
Conclusion
Bibliography

Introduction

Watching the documentary Berkeley in the Sixties comes in very handy, within a context of discussing differences between generations. It portrays Berkleys students as being utterly passionate about defending their political stance, which happened to be a neo-Liberalism. The neo-Liberalism has its roots in materialism, as the way of perceiving reality and therefore, can be closely linked to Marxism. This explains the fact why the young protesters against Vietnam War, shown in the documentary, often do not hesitate describing themselves as Communists or Marxists.

However, what strikes viewers as very odd is the fact that, while promoting purely materialistic Liberal values, the majority of Berkleys students in sixties, acted as classical idealists, who thought that their political activity had value in itself. This brings us closer to realization of what constitutes a difference between the generation of baby boomers and generation X. Apparently, the majority of baby boomers felt themselves as being a part of historical process, whereas the lifestyle of most of people associated with generation X is being marked with social absenteeism. This paper is aimed at substantiating this thesis.

Main body

In his lecture The Problem of Generations: Family, Economy, Politics, Martin Kohli is making a good point when he suggests that: Human generations lie at the root of social dynamics in all spheres of social life not only in politics but also in the economy and the family. The sequence of generations is about continuity and conflict (Kohli, p.4). In other words, the existence of social or political conflict, with which young people can associate themselves, is vital, within a context of these people realizing themselves as belonging to a particular generation.

In her article Gen (Fill in the Blank): Coming of Age, Seeking and Identity, Arlie Russell Hochschild provides us with the insight on Karl Mannheims definition of generation, which still remains valid: Generation is a cohort of people who feel the impact of a powerful historical event and develop a shared consciousness about it(Hochschild). The world in sixties was much different, comparing to what it is now. The economy in America was on the rise, while the power of organized religion was steadily declining.

In its turn, this brought about a situation when young people of the time were slowly realizing that their opinion really does matter. The fact that baby boomers often came from families affected by WW2, resulted in them being aware of what the concept of sacrifice for the sake of higher good stands for. This is why Berkeley in the Sixties portrays the majority of students as such that are willing to take a risk of being expelled from university, as the ultimate price for making themselves heard.

This is because in sixties, in order for the individual to gain a social prominence, he would have to prove that he is capable of taking risks, he would have to prove its existential uniqueness. In eighties, it was no longer the case. The dogma of political correctness resulted in creating a situation, when the possession of prominent personal qualities, on the part of every particular individual, poses a threat to societys stability. This is why, the majority of todays politicians, who belong to generation X, can be described as anything, but memorable. They are the embodiments of existential conformism at its worst. Even their physical appearance (grey suits, unrecognizable facial features, standard smile on their faces) emphasizes on it.

Let us describe a typical baby boomer of sixties, in order to be able to compare him with the typical representative of generation X, which we associate with eighties. The baby boomer is a person who truly believes that world can be turned into a better place to live. He is being deeply convinced that human life has an undisputed value and that people must be allowed to lead the lifestyle they want. He believes that it is a duty of every citizen to have a political opinion.

The real representative of flower children considers pursuing a professional career as something that deprives him or her of its existential freedom. At the same time, the fact that the majority of baby boomers had a quick mind, allowed them to gain financial independence, in later stages of their lives, without having to apply much of an effort. Given the fact that they grew up in time when there was no thought police, these people now often find themselves being charged with political incorrectness, even though that it was them who helped the ideology of neo-Liberalism to attain a status of an undisputable dogma.

Conclusion

People who belong to generation of eighties, on the other hand, are being best characterized by their consumerist attitudes, which can be explained by the fact that, during the course of their upbringing, they were encouraged to consider its own well-being as such that has a foremost value. Gen-Exers tend to choose in favor of security, in times when baby boomers would choose in favor of freedom.

The years 1970-1985 are now being commonly referred to as time between time, because the old geopolitical concepts began to loose its credibility, during the course of these years. At the same time, the post-modern world was not going to become a part of objective reality up until nineties. Hence, Gen-Exers split in personality. We can say that people who belong to generation X lack the idealism on conscious level, but they still posses it as part of their inner being.

However, the fact that they grew up in the period of economic prosperity, deprived them of many spiritual qualities, which allowed their ancestors to achieve such prosperity in the first place. Gen-Exers are generally being reluctant, when it comes to exploring their existential potential, because they know that it will prevent them from fitting into the corporate world, where the concept of existential uniformity is being promoted by Medias and by social institutions.

Given the fact that most of people who belong to generation X had never experienced any real challenges in their lives, makes them more susceptible to depression. Gen-Exers subconsciously understand that many aspects of their lives have artificial nature. Yet, they lack the courage of admitting it to themselves. In its turn, this often results in them becoming dissatisfied with objective reality, which often transforms into social escapism, on their part. For example, todays philosophy of New Age derives of Generation X collective subconsciousness. It is being designed to help people of my generation to deal with various life challenges, without experiencing the sensation of existential impotency.

Bibliography

Hochschild, Russell Arlie Gen (Fill in the Blank): Coming of Age, Seeking and Identity. 2000. Generations. New York Times.
Kohli, Martin The Problem of Generations: Family, Economy, Politics. 1997. Collegium Budapest. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!

60s Generation vs. Modern Generation

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We have qualified writers to help you.

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)